Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compilation
Compilation
courts.
ISSUE (ADMINISTRATION)
RULING/HELD
provides:
the time of his death did not impose a transfer tax or death
foreign country.
is being administered.
NOTES
Romualdez-Yap v. CSC
Facts:
Vs
Issue:
had the desire for continued employment with the bank, she
there is no reason for the Supreme Court to hold that she did
the FTD because it was restored four years later is a little too
function of government.
NIA maintains that it is not liable for the act of its driver
Shipside v. CA
Facts:
in the suit, or the party entitled to the avails of the suit. And
Lot 4, with 508 square meters. On April 11, 1960, Lots No. 1
Facts:
against the order issued by the trial court declaring OCT No.
0-381 null and void. The motion was denied. The Court of
Issue:
Held:
Issue:
Held:
it may not institute the instant action. Nor may it raise the
bank.
Authority
Facts:
and growth of the coconut and other palm oil industry in all
the Japanese).
war.
requires.
the voice of the majority and maintains itself against the will
Laurel vs Misa
and remain valid even after the occupied territory has been
international law.
ilipino citizen who adhered to the enemy giving the latter aid
then suspended;
Issues:
become his and derive their force from him. The laws and
Islands.
Held:
but an absolute an
change.
legitimate government
occupier.
the sovereignty of t
Summary of ratio:
unless repealed.
Facts:
HELD: The Court held that the petitioners were still subject
anymore.
hereby DENIED.
World Health Organization v. Aquino 48 SCRA 243
Issue:
Facts:
ACQUITTED.
quashal.
Issue:
diplomatic immunity.
Ruling:
the case at bar, it is then the duty of the courts to accept the
AQD), vs.
FACTS:
valid?
of jurisdiction.
ISSUE:
HELD:
and DFA.
objects,asappropriated by law
Held: Yes.
Facts:
Ratio:
Minucher is an Iranian national who came to study
of diplomatic nature.
business i.e. the former sold to the latter some caviar and
of US.
for him and his Abbass wife. Scalzo told him that he could
help him for a $2,000 fee per visa. After a series of business
United States (for the latter to send its agents and to conduct
functional category.
duties.
Lasco vs UNRFNRE
impleaded.
(T)he doctrine of immunity from suit will not apply and may
immunity.
two sovereigns.
figured in an accident.
influence of liquor;
to petitioner.
concerned.
IRRI wrote the Labor Arbiter to inform him that the Institute
Facts:
the case.
finding that IRRI did not waive its immunity, ordered the
complaint dismissed.
be established inBataan.
Issue: Did the (IRRI) waive its immunity from suit in this
relationship?
Trade Unions of the Philippines and Allied Services (TUPAS)
Held: No.
diplomatic immunity.
(DEFORAF).
proposition.
Issue:
Held:
ISSUE:
duties?
RULING:
FACTS:
officers of the local state but also where the person sued in
Assuming that the trial can proceed and it is proved that the
GRANTED.
Republic v. Feliciano
dismissed.
Yap, J.
of immunity from suit when the case was tried before the
court a quo, as alleged by private respondent, is not fatal.
Facts:
Makasiar, J.
Facts:
Government.
state:
Issue:
thereby is not more than 3,000 hectares each; and (be the
read as follows:
Consequently, a favorable judgment for the petitionerappellant would result in the government losing a substantial
Appeals
FACTS:
This is a petition for review on certiorari of the
Natural Resources.
(Emphasis supplied).
filed Civil Case No. 88-471 against the PC-Chief and PC-
aforequoted.
that the case is against the State which had not given
consent thereto and that VMPSIs license already expired on
Issue:
Held:
the petition.
now the Clerk of this Court that is at the same time the
HELD:
... At this stage, the Court notes from the record that the
monetary claims may not been forced because the State did
purpose.
PRINCIPLE:
Ruling: No
Rationale:
PNB v. CIR
Facts:
was contrary to law and (2) that the funds subject of the
amended."
corporations."
PNR v. IAC
FACTS:
flagman or switchman.
ISSUE:
1)
SSS vs. CA
negligent?
2)
FACTS:
HELD:
Spouses David and Socorro Cruz, applied and
part.
Association
1 SCRA 340
Facts:
and it can be sued for damages. The SSS does not enjoy
that it can sue and be sued in court. These words sue and
1972.
Issue:
jurisdiction thereof.
Held:
116,950 yards were in good condition and the rest were not.
lost.
Issue:
held liable for the 43,050 yards actually lost by the private
respondent.
Held:
Service
18 SCRA 1120
Facts:
Sometime during the month of November 1962,
four cases of rotary drill parts were shipped from abroad on
Facts:
Issue:
immunity.
Held:
Farolan vs CTA
Facts:
articles and all other tariff and custom duties, fees, charges,
The Office of the Collector of Customs ordered a reexamination of the shipment upon hearing the information
Commission
Facts:
lost.
Issue:
Held:
Issue:
be sued.
Held:
Commission on Audit.
91 Phil 203
FACTS:
and severally liable with the security agency for the payment
and the security agency did not appeal the decision. Thus,
and including July 31, 1948. These fees are said to have
Airlines, Inc.
Aeronautics Administration.
The third party plaintiff alleged that it had paid to the National
Subdivision, Inc. "on the belief and assumption that the third
party defendant was the lessee of the lands subject of the
The rule is not really absolute for it does not say that the
sovereign immunity.
ISSUE:
1.
be sued
2.
HELD
1.
separation pay.
Issue:
For Reference:
Larkins vs NLRC
Ruling:
Facts:
15 [1993]).
law.
ISSUE:
attys fees.
RATIO:
FACTS:
locally available.
acts done in their official capacity. This does not cover acts
may sue the official & such suit will not be a suit against the
qualified for that position and that person kept the position
authority.
Issues:
allegations.
Ratio:
after 180 days from the dated of the initial appeal to the