The United States Court of Federal Claims granted the United States an extension to respond to the plaintiffs' complaint in the case of Louise Rafter et al. v. The United States. The case is coordinated with another case, Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, regarding jurisdictional discovery. The court ordered that the United States must respond to the plaintiffs' complaint within 60 days after jurisdictional discovery concludes in the Fairholme case.
The United States Court of Federal Claims granted the United States an extension to respond to the plaintiffs' complaint in the case of Louise Rafter et al. v. The United States. The case is coordinated with another case, Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, regarding jurisdictional discovery. The court ordered that the United States must respond to the plaintiffs' complaint within 60 days after jurisdictional discovery concludes in the Fairholme case.
The United States Court of Federal Claims granted the United States an extension to respond to the plaintiffs' complaint in the case of Louise Rafter et al. v. The United States. The case is coordinated with another case, Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, regarding jurisdictional discovery. The court ordered that the United States must respond to the plaintiffs' complaint within 60 days after jurisdictional discovery concludes in the Fairholme case.
Case 1:14-cv-00740-MMS Document 9 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 14-740 C (Filed: October 10, 2014) ************************************* LOUISE RAFTER et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * ************************************* ORDER On October 10, 2014, defendant in the above-captioned case filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs complaint. This case is coordinated with jurisdictional discovery in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, 13-465. Defendant thus requests that it be required to respond to plaintiffs complaint sixty days after jurisdictional discovery has concluded in Fairholme. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED; defendants response to plaintiffs complaint is due sixty days after the completion of jurisdictional discovery in Fairholme. IT IS SO ORDERED.