Obama: Russia's actions in Ukraine put

Putin on the 'wrong side of history'

Officials drafting possible sanctions including asset freezes
Putin has so far ignored US demands for him to pull back forces

Russia's president Vladimir Putin listens to the head of the Russian army's main department of
combat preparation. Photograph: Mikhail Klimentyev/AFP/Getty Images
Paul Lewis, Spencer Ackerman and Dan Roberts in Washington
Monday 3 March 2014 14.57 EST

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp

Shares
564

564

Comments
372
US president Barack Obama on Monday called Russias actions in Ukraine a violation of
international law that place Russia on the wrong side of history as the State Department
prepared to draw up sanctions against Moscow.
Obama said he expected to work with Congress on a package of economic assistance to Ukraine
and warned Russia of worldwide isolation if it persisted with its aggression.
The strong condemnation that Russian has received around the world indicates the degree to
which Russia is on the wrong side of history, he said in brief remarks to reporters during a
meeting with the Israeli prime minister in the Oval Office.
There are two paths that Russia can take at this point. Actions on the ground in Crimea are
deeply troubling but what is also true is that over time, this will be a costly proposition for
Russia. Now is the time to consider whether they can further their interests with diplomacy as
opposed to force.
He added that if Russia continues on present path, the US will take a series of steps economic,
diplomatic that will isolate Russia.
His comments came hours after state department officials said it was highly likely that the US
would impose sanctions against Moscow unless Russia changes course and withdraws its troops
from Crimea.
The White House was reviewing its entire portfolio of trade and co-operation with Russia,
preparing a raft of possible US sanctions targeting senior government and military officials
implicated in the invasion of the Ukrainian peninsula.
At this point were not just considering sanctions, given the action Russia is taking, said Jen
Psaki, the State Departments press secretary. It is likely that we will put those in place and we
are preparing that right now.
Officials from the US Treasury and State Department were understood to be drafting possible
visa travel bans and asset freezes that would be presented to US president Barack Obama in the
coming hours. We are likely moving down that path as things proceed, Psaki said. We are far
more forward on this than we were even yesterday.
Advertisement

Obama is expected to use his his executive authority to bypass the US Congress to quickly target
senior Russian officials, as doubts emerged over the ability of the Washington to rally support
from Europe.
The most important thing is for us the United States to make sure that we dont go off
without the European community, the majority leader in the Senate, Democrat Harry Reid, told
Politico. We have to work with them. Their interests are really paramount if we are going to do
sanctions of some kind. We have to have them on board with us.
The secretary of state, John Kerry, was preparing to fly to Kiev as a gesture of support for
Ukraines new government. He was faced with persuading European allies dependent on their
economic relationship with Russia to go further than introducing travel restrictions.
Some 34bn was wiped off the value of companies on the Moscow stock exchange on Monday
after Russia suffered one of the biggest falls in its stock market in recent history.
The market crash, which hurt the energy industry hardest, came as Russian troops bedded into
the Crimean peninsula and adopted an increasingly bellicose stance. According to one report, the
commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Alexander Vitko, ordered Ukrainian military forces
in Crimea to surrender by 3pm GMT or face attack, though this was subsequently denied by
authorities in Moscow.
Psaki said that if true, the report would constitute a dangerous escalation of the situation that we
would hold the Russians directly responsible for.
Russian president Vladimir Putin has so far ignored US demands for him to pull back forces and
he appears unperturbed by the prospect of being politically ostracised by western nations. With
military action by the US or its allies out of the question, Washington has concluded that its most
effective leverage will be economic.
Privately, one US official said the chances of Russian withdrawal from Crimea are slim.
However the Obama administration hopes that a concerted multilateral set of sanctions could
change the calculus for Putin, and prevent any further incursion into Ukrainian territory.
Another official confirmed the US was specifically looking at the vulnerability of Russian
banks with ties to London and Geneva.
Diplomats and foreign policy analysts questioned whether EU states, particularly Germany,
would countenance the kinds of far-ranging economic punishment, such as Iran-style trade
embargoes or international banking restrictions, that would have the greatest impact on Russia.
Part of the problem is that any cessation to trade, particularly in the energy sector, could be as
acutely felt in European capitals as Moscow.
One European diplomat told the Guardian: I expect we will not be 100% in line with the
suggestions made by the US so far in relation to sanctions. In the EU there are all sorts of
different views about how the problem should be tackled. We might be of the opinion that in

order to keep talks with Russian open, we should not yet resort to sanctions at such an early
stage.
The source added that the consequences of imposing sanctions are less severe for the US than in
the EU, which is significantly more reliant upon Russian trade and gas exports. Japan, a key
member of the G8 group of western nations, is also believed to be anxious about punitive
measures that could harm the wider global economy.
Daniel Drezner, a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and
Diplomacy at Tufts University, said that with Europe reluctant to endorse a broad sanctions
regime, the kinds of measures being contemplated by the White House were unlikely to be more
than an irritation to Putin.
The trade the US has with Russia is pretty minimal, he said. And Europe is highly unlikely to
restrict the trade that matters in energy. They can cause Russia a little economic pain but not
much.
In Brussels, EU foreign ministers announced the suspension of visa negotiations with Russia,
believed to relate to some 80,000 service passport holders Moscow had wanted to be given free
movement in Europe.
Britains prime minister, David Cameron, was drawing up plans for a set of EU sanctions against
Russia that would be agreed at an emergency meeting before the end of the week. However most
analysts did not believe these would include the kinds of muscular trade embargoes or
restrictions to energy purchases that would be needed to tip Russia into a recession.
Nicholas Burns, who was undersecretary of state under George W Bush when Russia intervened
militarily in Georgia in 2008, said it was disconcerting to see Germany sending a signal of
lacking resolve.
Obviously Putin has won the Crimea through brute force. But if you measure this in years which you really have to in a struggle like this - then the advantage doesnt go to Putin, Burns,
also a former US ambassador to Nato, told the Guardian.
We shouldnt accept what hes done, and we should continue to argue against it, but
understanding the Russians and knowing what Putin is like, the chances are high Putin will never
leave Crimea.
Fiona Hill, a long-time expert on eastern Europe who directs the Center on the United States and
Europe at the Brookings Institution thinktank, said Putin had been preparing for this moment for
years, and effectively inoculated the Russian economy from western sanctions.
She said the Russian president has quietly but systematically adapted the Russian economy over
the last decade to make it less susceptible to outside pressure; divesting assets abroad and
relocating key economic interests closer to Moscow.

Putin has successfully spent years reducing Russias vulnerabilities to western pressure and
leverage, she said. At the same time, he has increased Russian leverage abroad, with
investments in Europe and the US. And he has pretty much guaranteed we wont introduce major
sanctions because of the harm it will cause to all of our companies now doing business with
Russia.