Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0207xx embu-project-gap-analysis-rev2-ME
0207xx embu-project-gap-analysis-rev2-ME
Jul-02
What are we doing
Primary
Driver of the
Project
Other critical
factors driving
project
Sustaining Projects
Customer,
Quality,
Sustaining - includes necessary
Customer
ongoing bug fixes and minor feature Field Sales,
TAC, Hardware Satisfaction,
enhancements to current shipping
BU, EMBU
PERS,
products. These projects have
Revenue
Transition to NG
been concept commited and are
slated for EC and FCS FHFY03
Customer,
Quality,
TAC, Hardware Customer
BU
Satisfaction,
other BU
bundles
Customer, TAC
RME 3.5 - minor feature release
(OTP support for Netconfig, Syslog
history, VLAN.dat files in archive)
with bug fixes to maintain product
through transition to the 4.0 release
Customer,
Campus Manager 3.3 - minor
TAC, Field
feature release including SSL
Sales
support, moving ANI from CMF to
CM, performance improvements and
PERs requests to UT, Path Trace
and Topo Services
Customer
Competitive
Situation
Analysis
Product Quality
EMBU Eng.
Move ANI from
CMF and SSL
support for
coexistence with
RME
Bundles Sustaining
LMS 2.2 - bundle refresh that
serves as delivery vehicles for all of
the sustaining projects listed above
plus RTM and DFM , Target FCS
12/02
Other Sustaining
RME for Cable - New cable
management functionality for RME
including, Netconfig, Configlets and
Netshow reports. Target FCS 8/02
NA
Would
start-up
fund it
Staffed for
Success?
Can be
combine
d w/
another?
Project
Assesment
Customer
dissatisfaction mainly
with device support and
bug fixes. Implications
of future hardware
sales, we've seen
examples of this in the
past (Bogueyse
Telecom, State of Cal,
WFB, etc)
Severe impact on
customer sat and
revenue
implications to BU
and future
hardware sales.
(Not an option for
sustaining)
Impact of cancel
No impact
Impact of
Accel
Drop in FY03
forecast for
LMS/RWAN etc.
Project
details below
12 to 30 M see
in direct
below
revenue
Direct
Revenue
FY03
FTE's
Req'd
for
Project
NO
Sustaining
needs to be
done to
address bug
fixes and
support
obligations.
GO
NA
NA
No impact
LMS, RWAN,
SNMS, CWW,
CW4MW, CWM,
CEMF, Cable
bundles (approx
11,000 units of
CV)
Mkt = YES
NA
Already is Minimal
part of
resource
overall CV required, roll
project(s) into LMS 2.2
slated for bundle
FY03
refresh
GO
Impact on
sustaining EMBU
revenues and
commitment to
customers.
Impact on
little or no
sustaining EMBU
impact,
revenues and
customer
commitment to
commits
large enterprise
customers such as;
Disney, Oracle,
Fidelity..
NA part of Dev =
LMS, VMS, 26
RWAN,
SNMS
Yes, RME
NG
Project CC,
EC 8/02,
FCS 12/02
GO
LMS bundle
(approx 5k units
FY03)
Mkt = YES
NA part of
LMS
Dev = 6
NO
Project CC,
EC 8/02,
FCS 12/02
GO
Dev = 1
Tst =?
NA
Campus is being
used more in
enterprise
production
networks, Fidelity,
Travelers, Hancock,
Oracle rely heavily
on Topo services
and UT applications
now for day-to-day
troubleshooting
Yes
NA
NA
Minimal impact
Approx 5M annual
revenue stream
Mkt = YES
5M
Dev = 1
Tst =?
SNMS
Targeted
FCS
Q3FY03
Delay
NA
Severe impact on
NA, time
hardware sales and based
BU commits
Unknown
Mkt = YES
NA
Dev =
11
NO
Quarterly
updates
GO
No
Mkt = YES
NA
Dev =
35
none
Huge installed
base
Device, BU driven,
delay could impact
potential sales
Severe impact on
NA, time
hardware sales and based
BU commits
LMS, RWAN,
SNMS, CWW,
CW4MW, CWM,
CEMF, Cable
bundles
NO
As needed
GO
Customer,
Buys time for
Treading water.
Field Sales,
transition to NG
TAC, Hardware product,
BU, EMBU
necessary
Revenue
security features
for CM
Large installed
base.
Customer satisfaction
quality, prolongs
transition if delayed
FY03 = 6000
Mktng = YES
(includes UPG, P1
and UPTs)
40 - 50 M
NO
GO
Customer,
Puts SNMS on
Field Sales,
same version
TAC, Hardware release of
BU, EMBU
current shipping
Revenue
RME
Provides overall
competitive
diffentiator at low
end especially
against Hua-Wei
and others.
New product
gaining
momentum with
Channels.
Severe impact on
Could
hardware sales and improve
overall satisfaction overall
schedules to
deliver next
gen if
accelerated
Additional support
costs, far outweigh
the effort of rolling
the bundle.
600 to 1000
5M
NO
FCS 3/03
GO
Customers,
Hardware BU
Enables
competitive
advantage for
provisioning in
Cable Mgmnt
segment
INSMBU commit
NO
No EMBU
resources
required
GO
BU commitment
Helps provide
needed mgmnt
functionality to be
competitive
see individual
projects below
SP Customers
Customers,
Hardware BU
Customer,
Field Sales,
TAC, Hardware
BU, EMBU
Revenue
New revenue
opportunities,
enablement of
hardware sales,
improved
customer
satisfaction
Customer
Next Gen UI,
(performance, security and
usability), Field coexistence with
Sales,
other NG
Hardware BU
products. CIDS
enabled, impacts
other Cisco
bundles.
Customer,
RME (4.0) Next Gen - major
Field Sales,
feature release including new UI,
EMBU
long awaited security features,
Revenue
integration w/ACS, performance
improvements, scalability
improvements, basic APIs and
enables new packaging for large
enterprise SP market segments. CC
Q1FY03, EC Q1FY03, FCS Q4FY03
Service
RME NorthBound API's Provider,
provides a suite of NB APIs with
Large
appropriate documentation and
Enterprise
support to allow both internal BUs
and external third parties and
customers to leverage RME
backend services via NB APIs. . This
will help us differentiate a Cisco
Network in SP's by allowing better
integration with NMS/OSS. CC
Q2FY03, EC Q3FY03, FCS FHFY04
SMB, DSBU,
Comercial
Field Sales,
EMBU
Revenue
Customer,
Field Sales
Large Retail,
WalMart, Home
Depot, State
Farm etc.
Customer,
Field Sales
Fidelity
Customer
NA
No
New product
Don't know.
Unknown
Depends upon
the specific
funtional area.
This should help
improve overall
market share.
Could gain
significant market
share in large
enterprise,
service provider
and managed
provider market
segments.
unknown
none
Mkt = YES
Mktn = YES
(Cable team)
Dev = 1
Mktn = YES
in conjunction
with INSMBU
Dev = 1
GO
commitment at BU level
unknown
GO
see individual
projects below
see individual
projects below
GO
Yes, initially
No
customers can use
5.x until full
transition to NG 6.0
is completed approx
12 months
Serious impact on
Targeted for
new messaging and Q3FY03
will impact BU ability accel would
to generate new
not help as it
revenue.
depends on
availability of
RME 3.5
program for
SNMS.
Puts more pressure on Business Units will
minimal
Bus to develop their
fund their own
own embedded
embedded
management apps if not development,
delivered this year with consistency across
initial platform targeted platforms will be
towards the Brinks
lost.
project.
SNMS, LMS,
RWAN, CW4MW,
CWM, Cable
(approx 5k units)
Mktng = Yes
NA
Dev = 1
Yes, CV
Concept
5.x, and
Commit 5/02,
embedded EC 9/02,
FCS 4/03
GO
Tied to hardware
sales of Cat6k
and service
blades
Mktng = Yes
None
Dev = 5
Yes, CV
NG team
will work
on this.
GO
Yes, however
No
continuing to push
out high priority
requirements
addressed by NG
will have impact on
future hardware
sales at large
enterprise
customers including:
USPS, AT&T, Sprint,
Chase, WFB,
Boeing, Intel,
Oracle, Fidelity etc.
Serious customer
satisfaction issues will
arise as well as field
sales confidence in the
BU ability to provide
timely enhancements to
critical feature sets.
Many of the proposed
features ie. secured
views have been put off
for over 2 years
already!!!
Severe customer
dissatisfaction,
possible delay in
hardware
purchases and
revenue to Cisco,
EMBU engineering
retention issues
LMS, RWAN,
SNMS, VMS and
new LE bundle
(approx. 1k units
if ship in 6/03)
Mktng = Yes
Approx
1.5M if
ship in
Q4FY03.
Dev =
23
Customer's in the LE
and SP space will have
to invest in building
and maintaining their
own scripts to meet
basic mgmnt needs.
Loss of opportunity
in the SP space.
Also will result in a
lot of overlapping
functionality bein
developed in
different parts of
the BU and Cisco.
Yes
Topo
only
maybe.
minimal
Impact on abilty to
provide important
customer used
capabilities, would
severely impact
overall customer
satisfaction
Unknown
Miss opportunity to
cooperatively market
with new router platform
launch.
Customer,
Field Sales
Customer,
SNMS 2.0 - new version of SNMS
Field Sales,
targeted at SMB and channel
market segment. Cooperative effort Hardware BU
between DSBU, PCG and EMBU.
Includes CMF, CV 6.x, RME 4.x and
WUG with improved "my Ciscoworks"
UI for novice users. CC Q2FY03,
EC Q2FY03, FCS Q4FY03 w/new
17xx router platforms.
Projected# of
Units
NA
Customer,
New feature set Required to help
TAC, Hardware management BU stay current with
BU
driven (ie
new devices
Emblade)
Field Sales,
CiscoView Embedded - platform
for building embedded management Hardware BU
functionality for new Cisco devices
and modules. This is needed to
bring consistency across new
services being added to Cisco
switches. Initial CC with evolution
from Brinks project.
Advanced Management
Services - best of Campus, VLAN
config, User Tracking, improved
Topo based upon NG UI, security
services, CMD. Concept Commit
Q4FY03, FCS Q2FY04.
Address overall
Incremental Device Updates 1.x - Customer,
TAC, Hardware device support
quarterly device updates and bug
BU
backlog for
fixes posted to CCO
RME, Campus,
DFM
Market Share
Position
Gain market
share in new
features and
intranet II
messaging.
No competitive
pressure.
Opportunity to
lead with a quality
solution.
No
NA
Would have
positive
impact on
overall
messaging
but
dependent
upon RME
3.x
maintenance
train.
Concept
Commit 8/02
w/Brinks
team?
GO
Mktng = No
none
FY04 = 2,400
M - No
none
FY03 = 200
FY04 = 5000
Mktng = Yes
Greater
barriers to
entry for
competition.
More
complete
solution from
Cisco should
improve
customer
statisfaction.
FY04 = 2,400
NO
Delay
4.8 M
CC FY03,
FCS 04
Delay
GO
Approx.
10M in
FY04
possibly
with NAM
Delay
M - No
Delay
N - Mktg, N Dev
Delay
N - Mktg, N Dev
M - No
Delay
N - Mktg, N Dev
N - Mktg, N Dev
Delay
Delay
Delay