Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study On Polycarbonate Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite Produced by Melt Processing
Study On Polycarbonate Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite Produced by Melt Processing
Key Lab of Rubber-Plastics, Qingdao University of Science & Technology (QUST), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266042, China
b Department of Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, QUST, Qingdao 266042, China
c Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
Received 9 October 2006; received in revised form 6 December 2006; accepted 26 January 2007
Abstract
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were filled into polycarbonate (PC) by large scale extruder, and some studies were carried out on
as-produced composite. The results showed PC composite containing 1 wt.% of MWCNTs had a tensile strength 4.5% higher than neat PC, and
the elastic modulus of PC/MWCNTs composite increased obviously with MWCNTs loadings. The electrical resistivity measurements indicated a
percolation of MWCNTs near 5 wt.% (3.4 vol.%) for the composite. Either the decrease in the fluidity of the composite melts with the increase of
carbon nanotubes (CNTs) loadings or the unexpected shortening of CNTs in extrusion was supposed to have weakened the effects of CNTs as a
reinforcing agent or a conductive filler.
2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Carbon nanotubes; Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Electrical properties; Mechanical properties; Electron microscopy
1. Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have diverse electrical properties [1,2], and have modulus and strength in the range of
2001000 GPa and 200900 MPa, respectively [3,4]. So, CNTs
has been regarded as a good filler for producing new functional
polymer-based composite. Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), polymer-based CNTs composite have attracted
considerable attention in the research and industrial communities, due to their good electrical conductivity and high strength
at relatively low CNTs content [510].
A key issue in producing polymer/CNTs composite is how to
achieve a homogeneous dispersion of CNTs in target polymer
base. Currently, three methods are commonly used to introduce
CNTs into polymers, i.e. solution processing [11], in situ polymerization of CNTspolymer monomer mixture [12], and melt
mixing of CNTs with polymers [13]. In context with industrial applications of polymerCNTs systems, melt mixing is
the preferred method of composite preparation. The tendency
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 532 8402 2950; fax: +86 532 8402 3977.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: chl5590@163.com (L. Chen).
0921-5093/$ see front matter 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.107
of nanotubes to form aggregates may be minimized by appropriate application of shearing force during melt mixing and
studies using melt processed thermoplastic polymer are increasing gradually. For example, Haggenmuller et al. [11] applied a
method combining solvent casting and melt processing together
to produce films of poly(methyl emthacrylate) (PMMA) containing single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). And the films
obtained by this melt processing technique had a more uniform
nanotube distribution than the cast film and led to much better
mechanical properties. Ferguson et al. [14] reported on kilogram
quantities of polycarbonate (PC)-based nanotube formulations
produced in a Buss Kneader. The results showed a better dispersion of the fibrils in as produced composite. Potschke et al.
[15] examined the rheological properties of MWCNTs filled PC
nanocomposite formed by melt extrusion.
Here we produced PC based composite incorporating MWCNTs by traditional large scale polymer manufacturing machines
like screw extruder. The electrical, mechanical, melt flowing
properties and microstructures of as-produced composite and
length change of CNTs before and after processing were examined. In the paper, the emphasis is put on the interrelationship
between properties and microstructures based on melt flowing
rate, and the influence of the length change of CNTs in melt mixing on the properties of composite. Although the properties of
288
289
Table 1
The tensile properties of PC composite with different contents of MWCNTs
Specimen
a
b
c
d
e
0
1
3
5
8
2350
2495
2641
2798
4183
60.84
63.60
54.83
43.32
25.55
105.00
39.750
4.087
1.9620
1.013
(1)
where EPC and EMWCNT are the elastic moduli of the two components, VPC and VMWCNT are their volume fractions. In other
words, the elastic modulus of PC composite increased with the
content of MWCNTs. This might result from the restrictions of
the stronger interfacial adhesion to the movement of PC chains.
For example, the elastics modulus of the 8 wt.% composite was
78% higher than that of neat PC. The tensile strength of PC
composite with 1 wt.% MWCNTs was 4.5% higher than that of
pure PC, but when the content of MWCNTs exceeded 3 wt.%,
the tensile strengths of PC composite became lower and lower.
The elongation at break of PC/MWCNTs composite decreased
with the increase of CNTs content. The decreases in either tensile strength or elongation at break of the PC composite might
be due to that the dispersion of MWCNTs in PC matrix became
less and less uniform when the content of CNTs became more
and more.
3.2.2. Electrical resistivity
In case of conductive fillers, electrical measurements are
suitable to detect the percolation composition unequivocally.
Fig. 2 shows the logarithm of volume resistivity (V ) for the
PC/MWCNTs composite as a function of the MWCNTs concentration. In our studies the percolation was roughly estimated
at about 5 wt.% (3.4 vol.%) MWCNTs in PC composite from the
curve in Fig. 2. Near this value the volume resistivity changed
greatly. The great decrease in the volume resistivity of the
PC/MWCNTs should, presumably, result from the formation
of the conductive 3D CNTs network, and the composite with
CNTs contents higher than 8 wt.% (5.5 vol.%) can be regarded
as electrically conductive. The percolation threshold and volume resistivity were not advantageous compared to the results
reported for PCMWNT composite produced by melt mixing
in a small scale twin-screw extruder using a higher molecular
weight PC [15]. This may be due to the relatively uneven dispersion of CNTs in the PC/MWCNTs composite resulting from
both the melt mixing process and the features of the MWCNTs
used in this study. Besides that, the small scale extruder used
in this literature was kind of different in mixing efficiency from
the larger scale extruder we used. What is more, the electrical
conductivity and the percolation threshold of composite varied
with host polymer [6]. It can be expected that the introduction of
some processing additives, the optimization of the mixing conditions, the proper surface modification of CNTs might lower
the electrical resistivity and the percolation threshold value.
3.2.3. MFR of PCMWCNTs composite
You can also find the answer to the above phenomena from
the results of MFR in Fig. 3. With the content of CNTs increasing from 1 wt.% to 8 wt.%, the MFR of the PC composite
decreased from 59.1 g/10 min to 0.5 g/10 min. Generally speaking, the higher the MFR values of composite were, the less the
fluidity of the melts in the course of processing. Thus, compared
with the PC composite with a lower CNTs content, the PC composite with a higher CNTs content were supposed to have less
uniform dispersion of CNTs, lower tensile strengths and higher
volume resistivities.
3.3. Dispersion of MWCNTs in composite
In order to make out the dispersion state of MWCNTs in
the PC matrix, SEM characterization was performed on the
290
291
[7] C.A. Cooper, D. Ravich, D. Lips, J. Mayer, H.D. Wagner, Compos. Sci.
Technol. 62 (7/8) (2002) 11051112.
[8] R. Haggenmueller, H.H. Gommans, A.G. Rinzler, J.E. Fischer, K.I. Winey,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 330 (3/4) (2000) 219225.
[9] Z. Jin, K.P. Pramoda, G. Xu, S.H. Goh, Chem. Phys. Lett. 337 (13) (2001)
4347.
[10] J. Sandler, M.S.P. Shaffer, T. Prasse, W. Bauhofer, K. Schulte, A.H. Windle,
Polymer 40 (21) (1999) 59675971.
[11] R. Haggenmuller, H.H. Gonmas, A.G. Rinzler, J.E. Fischer, K.I. Winey,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 330 (3/4) (2000) 219225.
[12] Z.J. Jia, Z.Y. Wang, C.L. Xu, J. Liang, B.Q. Wei, D.H. Wu, S.W. Zhu,
Mater. Sci. Eng. A 271 (1/2) (1999) 395400.
[13] J.X. Jin, K.P. Pramoda, G.Q. Xu, S.H. Goh, Mater. Res. Bull. 37 (2) (2002)
271278.
[14] D.W. Ferguson, E.W.S. Bryant, H.C. Fowler, ESD thermoplastic product offers advantages for demanding electronic applications, ANTEC98
(1998) 12191222.
[15] P. Potschke, T.D. Fornes, D.R. Paul, Polymer 43 (11) (2002) 3247
3255.
[16] M.S.P. Shaffer, X. Fan, A.H. Windle, Carbon 36 (11) (1998) 1603
1612.
[17] Z.M. Li, On in-situ fibrillation of GEP/PO blends and their morphology
and properties, Sichuan University, PhD thesis, 2003.
[18] L. Chen, M.Z. Qu, G.M. Zhou, B.L. Zhang, Z.L. Yu, Mater. Lett. 58 (29)
(2004) 37373740.
[19] L. Chen, X.J. Pang, Q.T. Zhang, Z.L. Yu, Mater. Lett. 60 (2) (2006)
241244.