Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internet Governance
Internet Governance
Peacebuilding
From concept to commission
by Robert Jenkins (University of
London)
Internet Governance
The new frontier of global institutions
John Mathiason
Contents
List of illustrations
Foreword
Acknowledgments
List of abbreviations
xi
xiii
xvii
xviii
Introduction
24
32
49
59
70
97
126
Contents
146
Notes
Select bibliography
Index
151
161
162
Illustrations
Figures
0.1
1.1
1.2
3.1
6.1
6.2
7.1
8.1
3
8
8
41
77
84
123
131
Tables
1.1
1.2
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
13
20
36
37
39
39
50
53
55
55
xii
6.1
6.2
6.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.1
8.2
8.3
Illustrations
Initial members of the ICANN board of directors
Members of the ICANN board of directors, October
2007
Composition of the Governmental Advisory Committee,
by region, 19992004
Participants in Preparatory Committee 2, February
2003, by type
Participants in Preparatory Committee 3, September
2003, by type
Composition of the WGIG by type
Composition of the Multistakeholder Advisory
Group (MAG) by constituency and region, May 2006
Structure of the Athens Forum, 2006
Structure of the Rio de Janeiro Forum, 2007
75
85
89
105
110
118
130
132
139
Boxes
1.1
6.1
19
94
Foreword
xiv Foreword
For those of us who teach, research, and practice in the area, this
access to information has been particularly frustrating. We were delighted
when Routledge saw the value of a series that bucks this trend and
provides key reference points to the most signicant global institutions.
They know that serious students and professionals want serious analyses.
We have assembled a rst-rate line-up of authors to address that market.
Our intention, then, is to provide one-stop shopping for all readers
students (both undergraduate and postgraduate), negotiators, diplomats,
practitioners from nongovernmental and intergovernmental organizations, and interested parties alikeseeking information about the most
prominent institutional aspects of global governance.
Internet governance
Governance and the Internet are two words that do not always sit
comfortably together. The Internets roots lie in the development of a
communication apparatus that the U.S. military was keen to develop in
the context of the bitter struggle with the Soviet Union during the Cold
War. However, its champions celebrate its current status as a vehicle
for freedom of expression, its unregulated quality, and its capacity to
allow users access to information previously denieda kind of global
democratization of access for all. Although clearly wealthy countries
have vastly better access than poor ones, that can be xed. As the 2001
Human Development Report noted, Policy, not charity, will determine
whether new technologies become a tool for human development
everywhere.1
For all of the protestations about who controls what, the Internet
has always been subject to a modicum of governance. Its early designers created a medium of information and communication that gave rise
to particular kinds of interaction and behavior. Its further evolution
has been driven by the twin imperatives of access to information and
commercial exploitation, both of which have shaped its development.
National governments too have sought to exert their inuence on the
Internets development, partially in response to the security challenges
that it has thrown up and partially in response to pressure from commercial interests keen to ensure that they have a head start in the
scramble for cyberspace.
In many respects, the governance of the Internet is an entirely new
development for global governancesomething that is to be expected
given its novelty. Yet, for all its novelty, the regimes that are emerging
to govern the Internet (regimes, because they are many and overlapping)
are proceeding in a remarkably similar fashion to the development of
Foreword
xv
governance regimes in other, much older, information and communication technologies. ICANNthe Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbershas evolved in strikingly similar ways to those
world organizations that emerged to govern the ow of mail and telegrams across state boundaries in previous eras. While the context is
dierent, the technologies the International Telegraph/Telecommunication
Union (ITU) and the Universal Postal Union (UPU) sought to regulate in the middle of the nineteenth century were similarly revolutionary. And the pressures to extend them furthera desire to exploit
their commercial potential coupled with the communications freedom
they oered (not to mention their potential for military application)
are also remarkably alike.
Writing in the early 1990slong before the shape of Internet governance had become anything near as clear as it has today (and there is
still quite some way to go)Craig Murphy described the role of such
nineteenth-century international public unions in the following way:
They have helped create international markets in industrial goods
by linking communication and transportation infrastructure, protecting intellectual property, and reducing legal and economic barriers to trade. As a result, [these] world organizations have played a
role in the periodic replacement of lead industries, a critical
dynamic of the world economy since the Industrial Revolution.2
Murphys insight resonates loudly with regard to the Internet. The technology might be new but the way in which the governance of the
Internet is emerging, knitting together older forms of communication
with those newer ones created by the information superhighway,3 is
comparable to the way in which the international public unions brought
pre-existing forms of commerce and communication together with new
and revolutionary techniques in the nineteenth century. Similarly, the
Internet has enabled intellectual property right infringements to be more
easily detected. And, it almost goes without saying that the Internet has
been at the leading edge of industrial change across the globe.
Yet, while the manner in which Internet governance has proceeded has
so far proven to be remarkably similar to the emergence of aspects of
global governance in earlier epochs, the substance of that development
still requires elucidation. Indeed, the technical details of the Internet and
the complex manner in which it is governed are such that Internet governance is dicult to grasp.
We were delighted then when John Mathiason agreed to write this
book. Indeed, there are few analysts who are better qualied than he to
xvi
Foreword
provide this tour dhorizon of what may be seen as the perfect symbol
for a shrinking planet. John spent 25 years in a variety of spots within
the United Nations, in the eld and in headquarters, working on such
issues as planning, the advancement of women, and rural development.
Having earned his Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
John was an unusual international civil servant in that he kept his hand
in teaching and writing over the years, and has written about it.4 Since
the late-1990s, he has been an adjunct professor and senior research
associate at Syracuse Universitys Maxwell School of Citizenship and
Public Aairs.
It was during this time that he established his own consulting rm and
put his own technical knowledge together with his passion for electronic communications. He has attended all of the preparatory and other
planning sessions that have led to the current eorts to break the U.S.
control of the Internet. This book and his own writings on the subject
clearly tease out the pluses and minuses of the current ICANN regime.
John has produced a book that is brimming with information and
authority, which could only be written by someone who has been present during recent international deliberations and who has keen analytical skills. As readers will quickly become aware, the book not only
renders visible the tentative moves that have been made in governing
the Internet, it also makes clear and readily accessible the complexities
of the Internet itself. As such, the book is an invaluable resource. It
clearly deserves to be read by all interested in the Internet and nascent
forms of global governance. We heartily recommend it, and we welcome any comments that you may have.
Thomas G. Weiss, The CUNY Graduate Center, New York, USA
Rorden Wilkinson, University of Manchester, UK
July 2008
Acknowledgments
I gratefully acknowledge the assistance given to me by friends and colleagues. Uwe Gneiting, my research assistant at the Maxwell School,
helped generate much of the data found in the tables. The comments
by colleagues in the Internet Governance Project, including especially
Milton Mueller and Jeanette Hofmann, have corrected errors of fact
and interpretation. My spouse, Jan Clausen, contributed her usual
admonition (dont make it read like a UN document) as well as
encouragement (make it interesting, please). The editors of the series,
especially Tom Weiss, have ensured that it meets both stylistic and
substantive standards. I am grateful to all of them.
Abbreviations
ALAC
APC
ASO
BIRPPI
Abbreviations
IP
IPCC
IPR
ISO
ISP
ITU
LAN
MAG
NCUC
NGO
NPA
NTIA
POTS
RATS
RIAA
SWITCH
TCP/IP
TRIPS
UDRP
UNDP
UNESCO
UNICT
UPU
W3C
WGIG
WIPO
WSIS
WTO
Internet Protocol
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Intellectual Property Rights
International Organization for Standardization
Internet Service Provider
International Telecommunications Union
Local Area Network
Multistakeholder Advisory Group
Non-Commercial Users Constituency
Non-Governmental Organization
National Planning Areas
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration
Plain Old Telephone Service
Rawalpindi Amateur Theatrical Society
Recording Industry Association of America
Swiss Education and Research Network
Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights
Uniform Dispute Resolution Process
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Educational, Scientic and Cultural
Organization
United Nations Information and Communications
Technology Task Force
Universal Postal Union
World Wide Web Consortium
Working Group on Internet Governance
World Intellectual Property Organization
World Summit on the Information Society
World Trade Organization
xix