Professional Documents
Culture Documents
'Great Power,' by Martha Rosler - New York Magazine Art Review
'Great Power,' by Martha Rosler - New York Magazine Art Review
'Great Power,' by Martha Rosler - New York Magazine Art Review
1 of 2
NYMAG.COM
THE MAGAZINE
DAILY INTELLIGENCER
VULTURE
THE CUT
http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/50974/
GRUB STREET
LOG IN
REGISTER
Follow
valid. But Rosler lapses into simplistic nostalgia and undermines her older work while basically making
pretty war porn. The only thing her work says is that fashion designers and women who like to shop
caused two wars.
Rosler also includes news clippings about Iraq. Most of the articles are from reliably liberal sources (The
Village Voice, The Nation, The New Yorker, etc.), so Rosler is merely filtering the already filtered.
Worse, theres an air of self-serving, pedantic preaching. She basically asserts that, while you may be
concerned with current events, shes so concerned she clipped these items and put them in binders. She
turns President Bushs Go shopping into Start clipping. To gain entry to Great Power, visitors must
drop a quarter into a turnstile. The shows press release states that this forces us to make conscious
decisions about how to engage with the work. This is critique art putting a gun to its own temple. A sign
at the door assures us that Rosler will donate all the quarters to antiwar groups. Anyone who thinks any
of this is good art, effective activism, or even slightly radical needs to get a grip.
Roslers show is simply mediocre. What it points to, however, is far worse and more widespread. Too
many younger artists, critics, and curators are fetishizing the sixties, transforming the period into a
deformed cult, a fantasy religion, a hip brand, and a crippling disease. A generation is caught in a
Freudian death spiral and seems unable to escape the ridiculous idea that in order for art to be political
it has to hark back to the talismanic hippie erathat it must create a revolution. It is sophistry to think
that everything relates to Europe and America in 1968. The very paradigm of revolution, of right versus
wrong, good versus bad, is a relic with no bearing on the present. Yet artists, exhibitions, and curators
valorize the sixties. People who wrote about these artists 30 years ago still write about them in the same
ways, often for the same magazines. Their students and imitators are doing the samewriting about
artists, sometimes the same ones, in the same ways their teachers did. Often for the same magazines.
Its a trap set by a previous generation in order to preserve its legacy a little longer, or at least until its
members relinquish their positions in academe, museums, and media. Many things happened in the
sixties, but the period is no more significant, better, or more political than today. Its time to turn the
page.
Great Power
Martha Rosler
2/5/2013 7:35 AM
2 of 2
http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/50974/
Related:
Archive: Art Reviews
Articles by Jerry Saltz
Table of Contents: Oct 13, 2008 issue of New York | Subscribe!
2/5/2013 7:35 AM