Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GBS 205 HW
GBS 205 HW
Note: There are six assignments due in Week 1. You will need to keep scrolling down to
view all the assignments.
Case 1-7, pg 17
Analysis:
Chapter 1
Go to chapter 1, page 17, find the item labeled "1-7 Court Opinions." Complete all the
questions for the Case. In addition to the case questions in the textbook, submit the exercise
for evaluation listed below.
Evaluation:
Choose one type of opinion: majority, concurring, or dissenting. Write a paragraph to justify
why it is important to our legal system. Include an example (real or fictitious) to support your
reasoning.
Remember, your answers should be specific, concrete, and concise. Answers must be in your
own words. Take the time to review the course grading standards.
Application:
Think of an current event/issue that might be affected by judicial review. Write a paragraph
detailing how judicial review would influence this.
Analysis:
Is judicial review still beneficial to our legal system? Why or why not? You must reference a
real-world issue and/or case to support your opinion.
Remember, your answers should be specific, concrete, and concise. Answers must be in your
own words. Take the time to review the course grading standards.
Case Study: read the case below and answer the questions which follow.
Chapter 3
A Question of Ethics
Linda Bender, in her application for registration as a stockbroker with A. G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc., agreed to submit any disputes with her employer to arbitration. Bender later sued her
supervisor and employer (the defendants) for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits, among other things, employment discrimination based
on gender. The defendants requested the court to compel arbitration. The district court judge
denied the motion, holding that Bender could not be forced to waive her right to adjudicate
Title VII claims in federal court. The appellate court reversed, ruling that Title VII claims are
arbitrable. The court held that compelling Bender to submit her claim for arbitration did not
deprive her of the right to a judicial forum, because if the arbitration proceedings were
somehow legally deficient, she could still take her case to a federal court for review. [Bender v.
A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 971 F.2d 698 (11th Cir. 1992)]
1. Does the right to a post arbitration judicial forum equate to the right to initial access to a
judicial forum in employment disputes? Should you grant the defendants request? Why or
why not?
2. Should the fact that reviewing courts rarely set aside arbitrators' awards have any bearing on
the arbitrability of certain types of claims, such as those brought under Title VII? Why or why
not? You must include an example (real or fictitious) to support your conclusion.
Go to chapter 4, page 113, find the item labeled "4-3 Commerce Clause." Complete the
discussion for the Case. In addition to the case discussion required in the textbook, complete
the exercise for application listed below.
Application:
Conduct and internet search for NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and review
the basics of the agreement. Does NAFTA fall under the commerce clause? Why or why not?
Use real-world examples or statistics to support your answer.
Chapters
1, 2, 3, & 4
The article you choose must also be in-depth and professional. Opinion pieces, blog
entries, Wikipedia pages, and one- or two-paragraph summaries are not acceptable.
If you need help getting started, visit the SCC Library online at
http://library.scottsdalecc.edu. At the right of the page, you will find a column
labeled Ask A Librarian. Library assistance is available 24/7.
Report Requirements
The written article review will be one half to one page (maximum), single spaced
using a font size no larger than 12 point. It should include the following sections, in
order:
1. Basic bibliographic information. List the title, author, publication name and date.
If you found the article online, please include the exact URL.
2. Brief summary of the article. Explain the article in your own words. This summary
will be one to two paragraphs in length. Be concise!
3. Analysis and Critique. This section should be your main focus of this
assignment. Draw some of your own conclusions about how the issue discussed in
the article will affect people and businesses in the real world. Three to four
paragraphs. Answer the following:
What specific laws?
How will this affect business?
How does this issue affect you personally? If it does not directly affect you,
describe how it would affect the general public.
All
Chapters