Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Procedureriskassessment PDF
Procedureriskassessment PDF
Type: PROCEDURE
Produced by:
Responsible Executive Director:
Date of Approval:
Date of Implementation:
Due Review Date:
Responsible Reviewing Officer:
This document replaces:
Signed
Chief Executive
Sub Folder:
corporate
File: as above
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 1 of 20
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 2 of 20
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1
2
Section Title
Page
Cover
Policy Validity Statement
Contents
Part 1 Introduction
Introduction and Statement of Intent
Aims and Objectives
Scope and Equality Impact Assessment Statement
Relevant Legislation, Guidance and Other References
Part 2 The Risk Assessment Procedure
Introduction What is a Risk Assessment?
Definition of Terms Used
How to carry out a Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Training
The Risk Register
Part 3 - Appendices
Risk Assessment Flowchart
The Electronic Risk Assessment Form and Guidance Sheet
1
2
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
6
13
12
15
16
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 3 of 20
Part 1 Introduction
1.0
NHS West Essex takes extremely seriously the health, safety and welfare of all staff.
It recognises that in carrying out its undertaking risks will be identified that need to
managed and controls introduced to mitigate the risks in order to prevent harm, loss
or damage to individual staff, members of the public including patients and the
organisation.
This guidance takes into account the requirements of the law relating to the
management of risk and risk assessment, as well as up to date guidance from the
Department of Health.
The Trust also recognises it has an obligation under the Health and Safety at Work
Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, for
the health, safety and welfare at work of its staff and others. These responsibilities
apply equally to ensure that there is proper management of identified risks, and that
staff understand the requirements placed upon the Trust.
This guidance document forms an integral part of the Arrangements Section of the
Trusts Corporate Health and Safety Policy. The roles and responsibilities of staff
that are detailed within that Policy are applicable to this guidance and procedure
document.
Where additional duties/responsibilities are identified relating specifically to Risk
Assessment, these will be detailed within this document, but must be read in
conjunction with those contained within the Health and Safety Policy.
2.0
b)
3.0
This document has been assessed for equality impact. It is applicable to every
member of staff within the PCT irrespective of their race, ethnic origin, nationality,
gender, culture, religion or belief, sexual orientation, age or disability.
This document is to be available to all Trust employees at all times. Managers must
ensure that staff have read and are aware of the content of this guidance document.
All new members of staff joining the Trust should be asked to read this guidance as
part of their basic induction.
West Essex PCT Risk Assessment Procedure & guidance
Version 2 - February 2010
Issued March 2010
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 4 of 20
4.0
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Approved Code
of Practice and Guidance (L21)
HSE 5 Steps to Risk Assessment Guidance (INDG 163)
HSE A Guide to Risk Assessment Requirements (INDG 218)
Boyle, T (Dr) Health and Safety Risk Management, Institute of Occupational Safety
and Health Publishing, 2000
Roberts, G (Dr) Risk Management in Healthcare, Witherby/Institute of Risk
Management, 2002 (2nd Edition)
Bateman, M Practical Risk Assessment Handbook, Butterworth Tolleys, 2001 (2nd
Edition)
NPSA - A Risk Matrix for Risk Managers, January 2008
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 5 of 20
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) describe risk assessment as nothing more
than a careful examination of the hazards associated with work activities and
premises that could cause harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you
have taken enough precautions or should do more to prevent harm. The important
things that you need to decide are whether a hazard is significant, and whether
satisfactory precautions are in place so to minimise the risk.
Risk assessment is part of good management. It can be used to determine the risk
to people from the physical workplace and the activities that are undertaken within
that workplace. It can also be used when developing new services, or designing new
premises in order to design out the risks to people by designing in the necessary
control measures.
Anyone can undertake a risk assessment, although there are a number of specific
assessments, such as manual handling, new and expectant mothers and workstation
assessments where some specialist training is required. Details of these
assessments will be provided in other procedure documents. The risk assessment
procedure contained within this document is usable by any member of staff.
2.0
An abridged printable version of this procedure and the risk assessment form
are contained at Appendix 2 and are available on the intranet
3.1
Use the NHS West Essex Trust General Risk Assessment Form.
3.2
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 6 of 20
3.3
Who may be harmed? Identify the persons who may be harmed. You should
consider not only staff, but also students/trainees, patients, visitors,
contractors, cleaners, maintenance workers. Consideration should also be
given to pregnant women and those with a disability or impairment. Refer to
people in groups ie staff, visitors, patients not by name or position. Having
identified who might be harmed, consider how many within each group of
people might be harmed.
3.4
3.5
3.6
Risk Evaluation Methodology & Tables. The tables below provide the
methodology to carry out evaluate your risk assessment. Having identified the
hazards, the risk rating is evaluated by asking and answering two questions:
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 7 of 20
(i) What is the likelihood of harm occurring? Has this hazard/activity caused
harm before, if so how often? Talk to colleagues and others in your place of
work
(ii) Will loss, injury or harm occur, and if so how severe will it be?
Note. The Risk Rating = Likelihood of Causing Harm x Severity of Outcome
Likelihood of Occurrence
Likelihood
What is the likelihood that harm, loss or damage from the identified hazard will occur
Likelihood
score
Descriptor
Frequency
How often
might it/does
it happen
1
Rare
This will
probably never
happen/recur.
Possible
Do not expect it
to happen/recur
but it is
possible it may
do so
Probable
Might happen
or recur
occasionally
Certain
Will probably
happen/recur
but it is not a
persisting issue
Frequent
Will
undoubtedly
happen/recur,
possibly
frequently
Severity of Outcome
Severity
If an injury, loss or damage occurs, how severe will it be?
Domains
Impact on the
safety of
patients, staff
or public
(physical/
psychological
harm)
1
None
Minimal injury
requiring
no/minimal
intervention or
treatment.
No time off
work
2
Minor
Minor injury or
illness, requiring
minor
intervention
5
Moderate
Moderate injury
requiring
professional
intervention
10
Significant
Major injury
leading to longterm
incapacity/disabili
ty
Requiring time
off work for >3
days
Requiring time
off work for 4-15
days
Increase in
length of
hospital stay by
1-3 days
Increase in
length of
hospital stay by
4-15 days
Increase in length
of hospital stay
by >15 days
RIDDOR/
agency
reportable
incident
Mismanagement
of patient care
with long-term
effects
15
High
Incident leading
to death
Multiple
permanent
injuries or
irreversible
health effects
An event which
impacts on a
large number of
patients
An event which
impacts on a
small number of
patients
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 8 of 20
Domains
Quality/
complaints/
audit
1
None
Peripheral
element of
treatment or
service
suboptimal
Informal
complaint/
inquiry
2
Minor
Overall
treatment or
service
suboptimal
Single failure to
meet internal
standards not
significant
Minor
implications for
patient safety if
unresolved
Human
resources/
organisational
development/s
taffing/
competence
Short-term low
staffing level
that
temporarily
reduces
service quality
(< 1 day)
Reduced
performance
rating if
unresolved
Low staffing
level that
reduces the
service quality
5
Moderate
Treatment or
service has
significantly
reduced
effectiveness
Repeated
failure to meet
internal
standards not
significant
Prolonged
suboptimal
treatment or
service
Late delivery of
key objective/
service due to
lack of staff
Staffing levels
below minimum
levels >1 day <
5
Low staff
morale
Poor staff
attendance for
mandatory/key
training
Statutory duty/
inspections
No or minimal
impact or noncompliance of
guidance/
statutory duty
Breech of
statutory
legislation
Reduced
performance
rating if
unresolved
10
Significant
Non-compliance
with national
standards with
significant risk to
patients if
unresolved
Multiple
complaints/
independent
review
Low performance
rating
Critical report
15
High
Totally
unacceptable
level or quality
of treatment/
service
Gross failure of
patient safety if
findings not
acted on
Inquest/ombuds
man inquiry
Significant
failure to meet
national
standards
Uncertain
delivery of key
objective/service
due to lack of
staff
Non-delivery of
key
objective/servic
e due to lack of
staff
Staffing levels
below minimum
levels > 5
Ongoing unsafe
staffing levels or
competence
Loss of several
key staff
Single breech in
statutory duty
Enforcement
action
Challenging
external
recommendatio
ns/
improvement
notice
Multiple breeches
in statutory duty
Improvement
notices
Low performance
rating
Critical report
No staff
attending
mandatory
training /key
training on an
ongoing basis
Multiple
breeches in
statutory duty
Prosecution
Complete
systems change
required
Zero
performance
rating
Severely critical
report
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 9 of 20
Domains
Adverse
publicity/
reputation
1
None
Rumours
Potential for
public concern
2
Minor
Local media
coverage
short-term
reduction in
public
confidence
5
Moderate
Local media
coverage
long-term
reduction in
public
confidence
10
Significant
National media
coverage with <3
days service well
below reasonable
public
expectation
Elements of
public
expectation not
being met
Business
objectives/
projects
Finance
including
claims
Insignificant
cost increase/
schedule
slippage
Small loss
Risk of claim
remote
Loss of 0.1
0.25 per cent of
budget
Loss of 0.25
0.5 per cent of
budget
Claim(s)
between
10,000 and
100,000
Non-compliance
with national 10
25 per cent over
project budget
Schedule
slippage
Key objectives
not met
Uncertain
delivery of key
objective/Loss of
0.51.0 per cent
of budget
Claim(s) between
100,000 and 1
million
Purchasers
failing to pay on
time
15
High
National media
coverage with
>3 days service
well below
reasonable
public
expectation. MP
concerned
(questions in
the House)
Total loss of
public
confidence
Incident leading
>25 per cent
over project
budget
Schedule
slippage
Key objectives
not met
Non-delivery of
key objective/
Loss of >1 per
cent of budget
Failure to meet
specification/
slippage
Loss of contract
/ payment by
results
Claim(s) >1
million
Permanent loss
of service or
facility
Service/
business
interruption
Environmental
impact
Loss/interrupti
on of >1 hour
Loss/interruptio
n of >8 hours
Loss/interruptio
n of >1 day
Loss/interruption
of >1 week
Minimal or no
impact on the
environment
Minor impact on
environment
Moderate
impact on
environment
Major impact on
environment
Breaches
of
Confidentiality
Minor breach of
confidentiality,
only a single
individual
affected
Potentially serious
breach up to 20
people affected
Serious breach of
confidentiality e.g.
up to 100 people
affected
Serious
breach
with potential for
ID theft or over
1000
people
affected
No
significant
reflection on any
individual
or
body,
media
interest
very
unlikely
Damage to an
individual
or
teams reputation.
Possible
media
interest
Damage to a
services
reputation.
Low
key local media
coverage
Damage
to
an
organisations
reputation.
Local
media coverage
Damage to NHS
reputation.
National
media
coverage
Catastrophic
impact on
environment
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 10 of 20
1
None
2
Minor
5
Moderate
10
Significant
15
High
Attainment
levels
show
negligible
improvement
year on year
Attainment levels
remain same as
previous year
Unable to show
continued
improvement
in
attainment levels
year on year
Unable to achieve
required attainment
level in 1 or more
key (Statement of
Compliance)
requirements
Unable to achieve
required
attainment level in
1 or more key
(Statement
of
Compliance)
requirements
Signifcant/High will
depend on criteria
unable to achieve
Signifcant/High
will depend on
criteria unable to
achieve
Domains
Information
Governance
Standards
Severity
Likelihood
Frequent
5
None
Minor
Moderate
Significant
High
1
5
2
10
5
25
10
50
15
75
Certain
20
40
60
Probable
15
30
45
Possible
10
20
30
Rare
10
15
Risk Rating 75
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 11 of 20
Reporting/Review Arrangements
Risk Rating 1-4
Low risks: are acceptable to the Trust, any actions required to reduce
risk will be responsibility of Directorate to fund.
Risk Rating 75
High risks: will be reported to the Audit Committee, with proposed risk
remedial plans to mitigate the risk. Actions to be implemented as per
the remedial plan and within 1 month where possible.
3.7
3.8
3.9
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 12 of 20
An integrated governance structure has been put into place to ensure all
significant risk management issues, including health and safety issues are
communicated to the Integrated Governance Committee, the Board
Assurance Framework, the Audit Committee and the Trust Board.
Copies of completed risk assessment should be forwarded to the Risk,
Security and Safety Manager for consideration and inclusion into the
Corporate Risk Register.
3.10
4.0
5.0
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 13 of 20
Part 3 Appendices
Appendix
Number
Title of Document
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 14 of 20
Appendix 1
The flowchart summaries the risk assessment process, for further guidance refer to
the HSEs Five Steps to Risk Assessment Guidance leaflet www.hse.gov.uk
IDENTIFY THE HAZARD/ACTIVITY that is
anything with the potential to cause significant harm
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 15 of 20
Appendix 2
Step 2.
Decide whether or not you are carrying out your risk assessment on an
activity, process or hazard, and explain what it is e.g. trailing wires
(hazard) or Use of Electrical Equipment (activity). Enter this in the
Activity/Risk to be assessed on the form.
Step 3.
List the hazards that have been identified with that activity, process or
hazard, i.e. tripping over the trailing wires. Use a separate box for each
one.
Step 4.
Detail what existing control measures are in place NOW, to reduce the
risk e.g. cable covers for trailing wires, safety guards on electrical
equipment, personal protection (gloves, goggles). Consider if these are
adequate and working.
Step 5.
Detail who might be harmed by the risk e.g. Staff, Patients and Visitors
and how many at any one time. You also need to consider anyone who
may come into the department, area where risk assessment has been
under taken. This needs to include anyone that may come into the
area after hours like Domestic Staff.
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 16 of 20
Step 6.
Consider what is the likelihood of the hazard causing harm, you must
be realistic and use past history like reported accidents / near misses.
Ask the staff that work in the area, ask other colleagues if that have
experienced this risk. Use the Risk Scoring Matrix for reference and
detail the identified number in the likelihood column.
Step 7.
Consider the severity of any harm should it occur, again look at the Risk
Scoring Matrix. Put the identified number in the severity column.
Step 8.
Multiply both these numbers together to get your risk rating and enter
this in the risk rating column.
List what actions you feel need to be taken to reduce the risk level.
Step 10.
Step 11.
Agree a target date for when action should have been taken by. The
time scale should represent the risk rating, higher the score the quicker
action needs to be taken, for example
Significant
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
Immediately
Within 3 month
Within 6 months
Within 9 months
Within 12 months
Step 13.
Step 14.
Step 15.
If you are unsure of anything, please contact the Governance Team on 01279
827163 and they will be happy to assist.
West Essex PCT Risk Assessment Procedure & guidance
Version 2 - February 2010
Issued March 2010
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 17 of 20
Financial
Clinical
Environmental = Waste/Pollution
Psychosocial (Stress)
It is the responsibility of all Directors to ensure that risk
assessments are carried out thoroughly and
appropriately ensuring that the form is signed when
completed. Copies of all risk assessment forms MUST
be sent to the Risk Manager.
How is risk scored?
Risk assessment allows for the measurement,
quantification and prioritisation of risk with a view to
removal or reduction to an acceptable level. This is
achieved by the simple process of multiplication of the
potential likelihood of a risk occurring with the severity
of its occurrence.
To achieve a risk rating, you need to look at the
definitions under likelihood and chose the most
appropriate, and then the definitions under severity and
again chose the most appropriate. Once you have
these numbers, look on the risk matrix and match the
two together, to obtain risk rating. You then need to tick
the appropriate colour box on the risk assessment form.
Severity
None
1
Minor
2
Moderate
5
Significant
10
High
15
Likelihood
Frequent
Certain
Probable
Possible
Rare
5
4
3
2
1
Likelihood
1
2
3
4
5
Severity
1
5
4
3
2
1
Descriptor
Rare
Possible
Probable
Certain
Frequent
Descriptor
None
Minor
Moderate
10
15
Significant
High
10
8
6
4
2
25
20
15
10
5
50
40
30
20
10
75
60
45
30
15
Example of Descriptor
The event may occur only in exceptional circumstance
May occur at some time
Will occasionally re-occur
Will occur in most circumstances
Is certain to occur in most circumstance
Example of Descriptor
No injuries. Financial loss < 100 and no service
disruption.
Temporary injury resulting in absence from work 1 3
days or increased length of patient stay. Financial loss
101 - 1,000. No adverse publicity.
Semi-permanent injury resulting in absence from work
3 15 days or increased length of stay 8 15 days.
Financial loss 1,000 - 10.000. Local adverse
publicity likely.
Major injury resulting in absence from work > 15 days
or increased length of stay > 15 days, temporary
closure to services, financial loss 10.000 - 50,000,
potential national publicity
Death or multiple injuries. Major disruption to services,
financial loss > 50,001. Protracted national adverse
publicity. Extended closure of services.
IDENTIFY
HAZARDS
EXISITNG
CONTROL
MEASURES
Consider any
control measures in
place at time of
assessment, that
reduce the risk.
WHO MIGHT
BE HARMED
ASSESS THE
RISK
ACTION
REQUIRED
MONITOR AND
REVIEW
Risk subject to aggregate review, to be monitored by Directorate, action to be taken to reduce risk if appropriate.
Are acceptable to the Trust, any actions required to reduce risk will be responsibility of Directorate to fund, action to be taken to reduce risk if appropriate.
Copies of risk assessment forms, along with timetable and action plans will be agreed and monitored by the Risk Action Group.
Will be reported to the Executive Committee along with proposed treatment plans, for action. Actions to be implemented within 3 months and audited by the board
Will be reported to the Board, with proposed treatment plans for action. Actions to be implemented within 1 month and audited by Board
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 18 of 20
Service Speciality
Locality
Assessment Date:
Location:
Exact Location:
Manager Responsible:
Completed by:
Contact Details:
Identified Hazard(s)
Who might
be Harmed
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 19 of 20
Likelihood
(L)
Severity
(S)
Risk Rating
(L x S)
Person responsible
for taking this
action
(Give name and title)
Target
Date(s)
1st Review
2nd review
3rd review
Name of Assessor
Signature
4th review
Signature
Please keep the original copy of the risk assessment at the premises/services to which it relates. A copy of the completed form should be
forwarded to the Governance Department at The Laurels, SMH within 7 days of completion for entry onto the PCT Risk Register.
For Governance use only:
Received Date:
ID:
Input Date:
Title:
Follow UP:
WE/08/PRO0004/CS
Page 20 of 20
Initials:
Ref: