Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E Notary
E Notary
html
THE ELECTRONIC NOTARY
Introduction
It is time to review the progress that has been made and the progress that has
not been made towards the development of the Cyber Notary in the UK. Back in
2000 we reported progress in terms that showed how frustrated we were at the
slow progress of electronic commerce and the development of the role of the
Notary. We said then:- The worldwide discussions about the principles had pretty
much come to an end. It seems to be universally acknowledged that:(a) the use of electronic communications will advance rapidly in commerce;
(b) communications on the open internet cannot be regarded as secure;
(c) businessmen ought to want security;
(d) they do not yet appreciate the importance but rely on closed systems for
large matters and take the risk for small ones;
(e) any system to provide extra security and open systems must consist of
strong encryption within a public key infrastructure system (PKI) provided by
trusted third parties;
(f) many governments still see such systems as a threat to security;
(g) governments and their organisations are beginning to use electronic
communications for their own purposes in a number of diff erent contexts.
Having got thus far things had begun to move more slowly than had been
expected. Since then it has become clear that the Government are withdrawing
from their active promotion of reliable electronic communication between
citizens and the State although several departments are moving forward
(notably the Land Registry) and others are trying. It has also become clear that
PKI (which seemed to all of us then, and still seems to us as Notaries, to off er
the only true security) may be too diffi cult and too expensive to adopt. It has
appeared that business organisations are not yet ready to accept the risks they
take in open communications on the Internet and those who are concerned about
security are relying on closed systems (while taking inadequate precautions to
control entry to those systems).
In May 2001 we produced a statement explaining the role and place of the
Notary in electronic commerce. We set out our view that Notaries could and
should be prepared to carry out their traditional functions for the authentication
of transactions entirely electronically. We argued that Notaries were uniquely
placed to provide reliable registration authority services to the providers of
systems or of services. We warned then that there were obstacles:There are already a large number of major players in the fi eld mostly off ering
relatively low levels of certifi cation at very modest prices. To off er higher
standards at much higher fees will not necessarily appeal to a large market. The
trick which will be aligned between the commercial success and failure will
be to pitch a proper but not excessive level of security at a reasonable fee which
is proportionate to the commercial sensitivity and importance of the documents
being transmitted. Most Notaries are not at the front of electronic developments.
Whilst most are now capable of using a PC for word processing and e-mails, they
are most comfortable with the simplest of installations which they expect to
operate without expensive software support. The need will be to fi nd a platform
for the transmission of encrypted electronic documents between participating
Notaries which can be simply and cheaply installed on any PC and will
seamlessly encrypt emails and identify the sender. Whilst it is hoped that there
will, in due course, be electronic legalisation through the Foreign and
Commonwealth Offi ce, this will take a very long time as it will require
amendments to the Hague Convention and their subsequent adoption by the
diff erent countries.
Firstly we show that there are Notaries who are willing and able to deal with
transactions in the electronic environment and that there is in place, as a result
of the Pilot Project of Notaries for E-Commerce, a workable infrastructure (i.e.
the technology) to achieve this.
Secondly we show that Notaries are willing and able to provide registration
authority services to providers, to the public and to Government and public
authorities, either through the tradition of personal appearance and verifi cation
of documents or information, or by the disciplined scrutiny of electronically
certifi ed identity and authority.
Thirdly we show how Notaries themselves can fulfi l one of their most important
duties, the keeping of their records, in an electronic form that will incorporate
added security to the current procedures for the identifi cation of individuals, the
most immediate and important requirement in so many transactions. Notaries
will be ready to meet the demand for their services when it comes, either
because the Government once again takes seriously its own concerns about the
reliability of the information it receives and upon which its governs, or because
business concerns and individuals come to realise the risks they take in insecure
communications can be avoided. It may be that a demand and a market place
will only arise when there has been a signifi cant disaster we hope that they
will arise because the public realise that Notaries have something useful to
off er.
It was recognised that project management would be diffi cult since the user
population was widely dispersed across the Country and NEC had no central
head quarters. It was decided that participating Notaries would need to be able
to commit time to project work on Wednesdays and also be able to access
technical support within their own law fi rms. The project relied heavily upon
individual Notaries taking up their own ideas with members of the Project team
as appropriate and building up discussion groups via email. Several ad hoc
meetings were held, also three steering group meetings and two teleconferences
and there has been a good deal of contact between Directors of NEC and the
Project Manager. At the time of training, Notaries were registered and issued
with digital signatures, which were then held in store on the site server to be
requested via email when needed. At the same time, Notaries equipment was
commissioned and installed with the Software Box application interface software
enabling Notaries to enter on screen relevant client information, together with
their own recording of the event being notarised and the digital signatures of
both appearers (i.e. clients) and Notaries who would complete the Notarial Act.
Initial Project work took the form of Notaries practising a simple application,
Early fi ndings showed the following: Notaries are well capable of conducting Notarial business electronically and
there is widespread interest in taking forward the notion of developing a secure
electronic Notarial service for the future.
There is considerable lack of understanding outside the Notarial profession
about the function of the Notary and this ignorance in industry has contributed
to the absence in the market place of fi t for purpose products needed to be
integrated into an electronic Notarial service specifi cation without risk to the
Principal Conclusions
If we are to draw any conclusions from the Project, the main one must be that
the technology does exist to enable Notaries to conduct their business utilising
the Internet in a secure and effi cient way and that such technology