20 January 2015 By David Arthur Walters MIAMI MIRROR The mere appearance of fighting corruption has gotten many a politician into office, yet corruption usually prevails however corruption may be defined. Now it is becoming increasingly clear that systemic corruption prevails in the administration of the City of Miami Beach despite the bullshit about customer service plastered all over town by the faux reform mayor and his right hand man as they give their own regime credit for winding up the projects of the previous regime, which they duly scandalized to get themselves into office. True, a few department heads and scores of minor bureaucrats were disposed of. Jimmy Morales, Esq., the new city manager, bragged about the terminations as if he had really changed the world at the chopping block. True, the mayor and his henchman deserve credit for a few accomplishments. Alas that the citys communications department dutifully keeps the public in the dark on the bad deeds while inadequately propagandizing the good deeds. Of course the mayor does not allow comments from anyone other than carefully selected friends on his Facebook pageonly Likes will dowhere he posts pictures of himself with his pal Bill Clinton and other VIPs, along with scores of photos of himself being flattered by F-type sycophants at various events. What overly hopeful residents will have here once the smoke clears is a lot of sizzle and very little steak, and the sizzle will be an insult to suspended intelligence. Less than one-hundred percent appreciation from the press is not appreciated. Good news is better than none at all, and authoritative sources must be had to sell advertisements, so professional journalists snivel for their crumbs Morales was shoed-in by the faux opposition to manage the city although he had absolutely no experience in managing a city, let alone managing a city chartered to be managed in a businesslike manner, nor does he have any experience managing a big business. Nonetheless, he is distinguished by his academic achievements and by several awards for his leadership of public programs. He was well regarded as the city attorney for the City of Doral, itself scandalized by corruption allegations at the time he bailed out to the beach. He had previously been a commissioner for Miami-Dade County. It is said that Morales aspired to be governor, but that was unfeasible, although he would definitely be a better governor than the one Florida presently has. If only he were his own man, he would be a good strong mayor if he hired a competent city manager. The problem with becoming governor was that few people inside and hardly anyone outside the county and has heard of him. He is a relatively minor politician and lawyer, perhaps because he is a nice guy in a vicious world where nice guys finish last. He is a definitely a homeboy, a political insider well connected to the local rent-seeking old cronies, some of whom he attended high school with. Page 2 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
He proved his sincerity when he cried when he got the city manager job. It is perhaps a safe harbor at the end of his career, if he does not buck the system. So a number of heads rolled as city employees were blamed for the systemic corruption. The scandalized former city manager, Jorge Gonzalez, blamed it on a corrupt commission, which he said he had finally dared to buck after over a decade on the job, and was therefore forced to resign. However, the building department and its code compliance division, the proverbial root of corruption, were left virtually untouched by the faux reformers. Indeed, the building department is still referred to as a racketeering or RICO operation run by The Untouchables. We shall see why when we examine discourse with its overseer below. Morales, with the commission in agreement because it admittedly agrees with almost everything he recommends, and naturally so since he is apparently doing its political bidding, did not fire Stephen Scott, Esq., director of the building department. Instead, he demoted him to assistant director, bringing in Mariano Fernandez, the scandalized building official of City of Miamis building department, to head up regulation of construction on the beach. Hernan Cardeno, Esq., a sworn police officer and purported FBI coordinator, was left in command of the code compliance division, but it was made its own department to be directed by him. Robert Santos-Alborna, now his assistant, is the former director of the division, who had been temporarily relieved of his duties to be investigated by or to assist the F.B.I. in its investigation. The pretext for appointing Cardeno to direct the newly created code enforcement department was his vaunted integrity and stellar resume, absent any empirical record that he had improved the performance of code compliance since he was placed in command during the F.B.I. investigation. There have in fact been a few improvements along with the usual negligence, selective and discriminatory enforcement along with continued comparison of the black-shirted code officers to mafia soldiers. The evidence either way is merely anecdotal since calls for a thorough audit have been ignored by an internal auditing staff also left intact by the city manager. The computer is blamed for many of the faults rather than the idiots that sit between the keyboards and monitors. Why the IT staff has not been replaced by the new manager is a wonder. I have already amply reported my detailed concerns that code enforcement has not improved in several important respects since the new regime took over, notwithstanding the sincere efforts of its handsome and suave director, who appears to be well liked by the code officers and the ones he did not fire. Not only is Cardeno confronted by the same old systemic corruption, he is the unwitting victim of the self-justifying bullshit of the new regime. He has to be a team player to survive, while the affluent politicians he caters to require only a few thousand votes from an otherwise apathetic public to secure their part-time positions. Ironically, the police officer in this lawyer prides himself in being a straight-shooter, so proud
Page 3 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
that, suffering from institutional blindness, he does not realize that some of the inferences he makes from the information he has on hand are simply bullshit designed to fend off criticism. As the philosopher Harry Frankfurt pointed out in On Bullshit (2005), his bestselling bullshit about bullshit, sincerity itself, when someone does not know what is really going on, is the most dangerous form of bullshit, far more dangerous than deliberate lies. Whether the content of bullshit is true or false does not matter as long as it excuses the status quo, dismissing any positive suggestions embedded in constructive criticism. And everyone is more or less guilty of bullshitting in this day and age, even yours truly. A.C. Weinstein, one of the citys great bullshitters after he left the local newspaper and went to work for Mayor Mattie Bower, told me that I qualified for CANDO artist housing (there is no such thing) because journalists are bullshit artists. The last thing he said to me was that the public mistakenly thinks that public officials know what is going on. May A.C. rest in peace. Morales, once himself a special master for the city, managed to have the special masters replaced, because, he said, he wanted to take the special master or administrative magistrate facility in a new direction. It must be understood that the quasi-judicial special master facility is not a court or independent judicial branch of city government created to hear local code enforcement cases, nor are special masters appointed by a real court, but the agency is rather an arm of the city administration. I myself have witnessed one demonstrably inexperienced hence incompetent special master in action, dutifully condoning the code compliance departments unconscionable action after looking up the wrong thing in the code book. In fact, the special master facility is a honey pot for local fix-it attorneys. If you have the wherewithal, and you probably do if the fine is very large, the problem can be easily fixed for a fee. The little people must pay up comparatively small fines in full or cough up a big retainer. Babak Movahedi, a former special master, with the support of his chief special master, Abe Laeser, tried to actually apply the law to the building department and code compliance cases before him instead of going along with the administration and the fixers. That angered a number of officials including city attorneys, who, to their credit, agreed that special masters should enjoy a modicum of independence, and that the rather opaque proceedings should be brought into the light of day with a better record system and the broadcasting and videotaping of hearings for public consumption. The public would find that ring of the city circus very entertaining, but too bad, Morales threw the wrench into the compromise. The public is left in the dark. The directors of the code compliance and building departments are not wholly at fault for departmental faults. After all, they too are underlings. They oversee the quotidian operations of their departments, but assistant city manager Joe Jimenez, Esq. is their superior. Jimenez was the assistant city attorney for the City of Doral, one of several Doral officials Morales who abandoned that version of the mythical Ship of Fools for the City of Miami Beach, which itself was veering crazily off the course to paradise. Wealthy cruise ship publicist Philip Page 4 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
Levine was recruited to purchase a commission majority and figurehead the salvage operation for rent-seeking cronyism. Jimenez, who is also in charge of Ethics for the city, certainly knows how to bullshit for his mentor. When Morales wants troubling information dismissed, Jimenez serves as his troubleshooting defense lawyer. He has gained a reputation for being a hardworking man with a dismissive attitude. One may sympathize with him given the crap his boss puts him up to. Anyway, both of these members of the Florida Bar, if they are excellent lawyers, must be commended for their public-spirited charity for not going back to the law firms on their resumes instead of working as city employees. Morales, in response to my concerns about corruption in respect to the collection of building permit fees, referred me to Jimenez, stating that Jimenez oversees the building department. Fernandez, the building official, had already stonewalled me on the issue. Jimenez said that his opinions in the matter could not be attributed to Morales. And Morales absolutely deferred to Jimenez without a word. . The reader may be aware of how the previous city administration was scandalized by the allegations of fired fire inspector David Weston, to the effect that millions of dollars in permit fees were not being collected by the building department because owners were understating the construction costs on which permit fees were calculated. I happened to have independent information indicating that values were habitually understated on building permit applications. Weston said he was fired for blowing the whistle. Morales, shortly after taking office, promised me that he would not brush that subject under the rug. And that is just what he did, using the human resources department to that end. I persisted with the undervaluation issue, particularly in respect to a Sunset Harbour penthouse where the contractor on behalf of the owner, a developer who had signed blank permit applications forms, had proceeded to build out the completely empty space after obtaining a permit to partially demolish a nonexistent bathroom and kitchen that appeared on old plans for a full buildout that had never actually come to fruition. The fee was $947 for a declared construction value of $6,000. So I suspected that the plan was to do a million dollar buildout as if it were just a kitchen and bathroom renovation, cheating the city out of about $30,000 of regular fees. Building department officials ignored my pleas until Jorge Gonzalez, city manager, provoked building officials into inspecting the site. Around $400,000 of construction had already been completed. The total signed contract, a copy of which was leaked to the building department and its building official, was for $997,453.40 before add-ons. A stop work order was issued. Another blank permit application was filled out and filed, with a total construction value of $400,000, upon which the regular permit fee was charged. I insisted that a double permit fee be charged as required by code, the double amount being a fine for starting construction without a permit. I followed up on the issue because, although I was told by building officials that the fine was never waived, contractors said that it was sometimes Page 5 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
waived and nobody knew the difference. The motto stated by an unlicensed contractor who rented license numbers for permitting purposes was, Everybody does it, everybody knows it, nobody cares. The building department finally charged the double-the-fee fine, changing the permit fee from $24,532 to $46,945. Do not worry about the owner: he would eventually deduct far more than that in late completion fees from the unlicensed, de facto general contractors billings, perhaps knowing that the contractor would not get any balance at all if the whole scheme were exposed in court. Efforts were soon made by city officials to obtain authorization from the state building commission to waive double permit fee fines providing that owners came forward and confessed to doing jobs without permits before being caught red-handed. Of course the timing of amnesty requests from owners could be manipulated for corrupt purposes. It appeared that a bullshit waiver program was needed to cloak monkey business as usual. As for the Sunset Harbour permit that I was concerned with, I was informed by the building official that the cost of construction did not matter since the city had changed its assessment method, from charging a percentage of the values, to charging fees based of how many square was involved in the construction. The new method was effective Feb. 1, 2010. Well, that was not quite true. According to Tony Gonzalez, the operations manager of the building department, a small percentage of the value stated on applications was still being charged after the change to defray sanitation impact and county code compliance costs, and the valuations were also used to trigger the application of FEMA flood requirements. So the $600,000 difference between $400,000 stated on the permit and the $1,000,000 stated on the invoice could result in underfunding of those programs amounting to several thousand dollars on this permit, and, if the undervaluation process were widespread, it could amount to a million or more dollars uncollected and distributed. Weston said he took this kind of shortage with the inspector general for the county, pointing out that the county was affected. The inspector general, lacking resources, is not interested, however, in investigating the events originating in the City of Miami Beach. Wherefore I persisted with my attempts to get the city to at least calculate the correct fee if not to collect it, to no avail, thanks to Jimenez, who beat around the bush several times, and not only declined to demonstrate how a fee would be calculated on a hypothetical $1,000,000 for a 6,000 square foot condo buildout, but, after declaring that current permit fees are based on construction cost valuations subject to a minimum determined by square feet, reduced the stated value of the actual contract from $1,000,000 to $352,000. His explanation for his reduction in value illustrates how bullshit works for City of Miami Beach corruption when the administration has discretion to do anything it damn well pleases in these crucial financial matters.
Page 6 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
Most importantly, he noted, paraphrasing Section 554.80(7) of the Florida Building Code, It is important to note that the Building Department is not a revenue generating department. Permit fees are intended to cover the cost of operating the Department and should not provide a windfall to the City. Granted, there are years when the building boom provides the City with a surplus, which may only be used for the operation of the Department in future years when development slows. He denied that he meant to imply, on behalf of his boss, that fees would not have to be collected because the build department broke even with its costs for the year. Your conclusion that the City Manager doesnt want to collect permit fees because he doesnt think that the Building Department is not a revenue generating department is a bit off the mark. For one thing, the Manager never said such a thing, I did. Secondly, I never stated, implied or hinted at not wanting to collect fees. The city manager neither admitted nor denied that he did not want to collect the fees: he simply stonewalled me with utter silence, relying on his troubleshooter to get rid of me. So what about the fees? Jimenez proceeded to deduct certain irrelevant costs merely associated with construction from the $1,000,000 construction invoice: Yes. The cost of construction stated to the city determines the permit fee. However, there is a minimum construction cost per square foot. There are other costs associated with construction that are irrelevant to the permit fee, such as the cost of a toilet. If a homeowner installs a ten thousand dollar toilet as opposed to a five hundred dollar toilet, the level of review from the Building Department is the same. Therefore, those types of costs are not calculated as they do not increase the level of plans review or inspection. Consequently, it should not be a factor in determining a permit fee. I specifically wrote to you that certain costs associated with permits application review and inspection are irrelevant to the costs of that review and inspection. For example, the contract you provided indicates that a certain type of flooring was installed in that project. That is an example of an irrelevant cost. All flooring is inspected the same way. There are a number of other examples of irrelevant costs in this unverifiable document, such as painting, baseboards, the costs of the closets and the TV and audio installation. In addition to other irrelevant costs itemized in the document provided, my calculation of irrelevant costs comes out to approximately six hundred thousand dollars. In other words, the relevant costs of construction amount to three hundred and fifty two thousand dollars. Consequently, the permit application was correct. Certainly Jimenez could not be so stupid, I surmised. His mistake is in thinking other people are stupid enough to be fooled by his bullshit, which goes even beyond bullshit into deliberate lying.
Page 7 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
There is no such thing as irrelevant installation costs associated with construction. Such costs are construction costs, just as a rose is a rose is a rose. The cost of labor installing a floor is a construction cost, just as is the material. The notion that permit fees might be charged only on construction labor and overhead, and not materials is appealing but is not realistic or appropriate. Take, for example, the flooring. Not only the work but the flooring material, for example, must be permitted. The flooring line item he refers to is described on the contract as follows: Install stone floor throughout apartment and balconies and upper deck as per plan (material by contractor). Install tile at all bathroom walls as per plan. Install interior soundproof insulation throughout the exterior and waterproof on balconies as per plan. $225,000. Should we deduct the wood, concrete, and other materials from structures when we assess permit fees? Should we deduct the installation, leaving us nothing to charge the fee on? Jimenez had plastered the subject with la plasta de la mierda. In doing so, he gave me the opinion that he is either incompetent, certainly incapable of overseeing the building department, or dishonest, which might qualify him for the task as it is normally done. That is not to say that some costs associated with construction are not assessed, and those deductions differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. I pointed out to Jimenez that, in one jurisdiction, the city expressly included, for example, all costs associated with construction of a kitchen except the refrigerator. Of course furniture would not be included, and, furnishings had been separately charged on the particular job I presented as an example. Some jurisdictions, such as the University of Florida, expressly describe what is included as costs on which permit fees are charged: The cost shall include total value of work for which the permit is being issued, including materials and labor and all related electrical, mechanical, plumbing equipment, gas systems, and permanent installed building systems. I asked Jimenez for the citys similar schedule of permit fees. It did not specify what must be included in calculating costs. Alas that I am a slow thinker, because it was only then that a bulb when off and it dawned on me what he was concealing with his bullshit as an agent of the administration and commission. They had in effect rolled back the reforms that the previous regime had made to reduce the opportunity for corruption in the building department. On April 16, 2008, subsequent to the arrest of several city employees, Jorge Gonzalez described to Mayor Matti Bower and the commissioners several improvements he had made to curb corruption. At that time permit fees were being assessed on a hybrid job valuation/square footage basis. AlE Affidavit for Job Value and Total Gross Square Footage: Creation of a new form, which requires execution by the Owner/Developer, Architect and Contractor, enabling the Building Department to verify and ensure that permit fees are assessed according to the fee ordinance Page 8 of 9
MIAMI MIRROR TRUE REFLECTIONS
and to establish accountability, and create an audit trail for the proper collection and assessment of permit fees. This step also requires a licensed, independent third party to certify the estimated job value and the gross square footage, which become the basis for the building permit fees. This procedure also creates a paper trail that can always be referred to during the process. Previously, this information in many cases was provided by the developer or owner and not verified. In 2010 that method was ascertained to be too costly and complex for adequate enforcement. The commission ordained that building fees be assessed on a square footage basis. Come to think of it, that method presents the easiest way to check an owners statement about the work to be performed, simply by measuring out the number of square feet. Indeed, the misstatement of construction costs is so prevalent that the county appraiser considers construction cost inputs from the various jurisdictions as mere estimates. So now the affidavit swearing to construction costs would no longer be required, although the value would still have to be stated on the permit applications. A small portion of the fees were charged on the value and not on square footage. Further, an owner could seek relief if square footage fees exceeded 10% of the construction costthat aspect was also dropped with the next reform. In 2014, the city commission, following the administrations recommendation, as it almost always does according to Commission Michael Grieco, the mayors right hand man, reverted to the construction cost method of assessing fees. No affidavit of job value or audit of stated values is required. Why bother with that when Joe Jimenez, Esq., who oversees the building and code compliance departments and the citys ethics, is there to add and deduct from contracts whatever suits the occasion? Needless to say, the occasion may very well be an opportunity for moral and criminal corruption. All seems well as long as Peter can be robbed to pay Paul so the city can break even. Such is the Miami Beach way of doing things. # #