Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Based Model For Groundwater Vulnerability and Assessment of Nitrate Pollution Hazard in Kathmandu Basin
Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Based Model For Groundwater Vulnerability and Assessment of Nitrate Pollution Hazard in Kathmandu Basin
Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Based Model For Groundwater Vulnerability and Assessment of Nitrate Pollution Hazard in Kathmandu Basin
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
Paper No. OT-07
Key words
Groundwater
vulnerability, Nitrate
hazard, Fuzzy model,
DRASTIC
parameters,
Kathmandu
1.
Abstract
This paper presents fuzzy inference system (FIS) as an alternative to the
conventional overlay index method for the evaluation of groundwater
vulnerability to nitrate pollution in watershed scale within GIS environment. A
hierarchical FIS model has been developed benefiting from expert knowledgebased DRASTIC system to produce groundwater vulnerability maps showing
the likelihood of groundwater pollution due to different hydrogeological factors.
A case study relating to groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer
of Kathmandu basin, Nepal has been accomplished. Spatial distribution map of
nitrate has been developed to show the level of nitrate hazard in the study basin.
Nearly 10% of the study area exceeded WHO guidelines of 10 mg/L nitrate-N
value and nearly 60% of shallow aquifer has impacted level of nitrate-N, i.e.
between 2 and 10 mg/L. These results also indicated that the northern part of the
Valley and highly permeable alluvial deposits are dominated by very high
vulnerability level is also under the threat of high nitrate-N pollution hazard. A
significant correlation between vulnerability index and nitrate-N concentrations
suggests that the groundwater vulnerability map was consistent with observed
nitrate-N contamination.
Introduction
Strategies for protecting groundwater aquifer from contaminations like nitrate-N rather than
development of new water resources and supply projects may prove to be in many cases the
optimal policy. Removal of nitrate from groundwater aquifer is often technically problematic
and costly, and finding alternative sources for water supply is not always possible. So,
groundwater aquifer vulnerability to nitrate has become a major concern of planners, decision
makers, and water managers involved with managing the quality of water in relation to human
health. In recognition of the need for effective and efficient methods for protecting groundwater
resources from future contamination, scientists and resource managers have sought to develop
techniques for predicting which areas are more likely than others to become contaminated as a
result of activities at or near the land surface (National Research Council, 1993). This concept
has been widely termed to groundwater vulnerability to contamination. To tackle the
groundwater pollution and to protect its quality in a more scientific and efficient way, the many
overlay index methods are used. The most widely used among these techniques include GOD
- 564 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
(Foster, 1987), IRISH (Daly and Drew, 1999), AVI (van Stemproot et al., 1993), DRASTIC
(Aller et al., 1987), SINTACS (Verba and Zaporozec, 1994) and EPIK technique ((Doerfliger
and Zwahlen, 1997). Among them, DRASTIC is widely applied either in its original form or
modified form in various countries (Lynch et al., 1997; Fritch et al., 2000; Ei-Naqa, 2004;
Babiker et al., 2005; Rahman, 2008; Pathak et al., 2009; Yin et al., 2013; Duarte et al., 2014;
Neshat et al., 2014a, b; Kumar et al., 2014 etc.). DRASTIC acronym stands for the seven
hydrogeological parameters; depth to water, recharge, aquifer media, soil type, topography
(slope), impact on the vadose zone media and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. However,
groundwater vulnerability mapping using overlay index methods are not easy task due to
inherent uncertainty and limited input data. Therefore, a fuzzy model has been applied to solve
this problem incorporating the non linear mapping of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability
concept benefiting from fuzzy engine and expert knowledge-based DRASTIC parameters
(Dixon, 2005; Nobre et al., 2007; Afshar et al., 2007; Pathak and Hirtasuka, 2011; Rezai et al.,
2013). But, the exponential increase in rules will be problematic in most cases. In order to
overcome the problem of rule explosion, the hierarchical rule techniques in the fuzzy system
design is very useful. So, this paper presents fuzzy inference system (FIS) as an alternative to
the conventional overlay index method for the evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to
nitrate pollution in watershed scale within Geographic Information System (GIS) environment.
A hierarchical FIS model has been developed benefiting from expert knowledge-based
DRASTIC system to produce groundwater vulnerability maps showing the likelihood of
groundwater pollution due to different hydrogeological factors. A case study relating to
groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu basin, Nepal has been
accomplished. Nitrate-N risk map has been developed by combining groundwater vulnerability
and nitrate hazard maps to identify areas that currently are at risk.
2.
- 565 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
FIS1
Recharge
(R)
FIS2
FIS3
Aquifer
media (A)
FIS4
Soil media
(S)
FIS5
Topography
(T)
FIS6
(Vulne
rability
index)
Impact on
vadose zone
(I)
Hydraulic
conductivity
(C)
(a)
Nitrate-N data in
GW wells
Nitrate-N hazard
map
GW vulnerability
map
Groundwater
nitrate-N
risk map
(b)
Figure 1 Methodology outline of (a) hierarchical fuzzy inference system for the evaluation of aquifer
groundwater vulnerability using DRASTIC parameters, (b) preparation of Nitrate-N risk map
- 566 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
The membership functions can be constructed from several basic functions such as
piecewise linear functions, the Gaussian distribution function, the sigmoid curve, quadratic and
cubic polynomial curves. The triangular and trapezoidal membership functions are the simplest
and have been used in this study due to their modeling flexibility. Each input domain was
divided into three sub-domains (i.e., Low, Medium, and High) and output domain
divided into five sub-domains (i.e., Very low, Low, Medium, High and Very high).
In general, fuzzy rule-based systems benefit from rule bases which mainly are organized using
experts knowledge. This study employs expert knowledge from the general knowledge of the
experts who developed the DRASTIC system, however one may benefit from knowledge of
local experts and knowledge obtained from computer simulation to improve the rules and
system performances. For example, the rules are of the form; If D (depth to groundwater) is L
(low) AND R (recharge) is H (high) THEN FIS1 is VH (very high)
.
All seven input data layers used in DRASTIC system were generated and/or obtained
from its original source as a point, line, or polygon layer. Then, all seven parameters
contributing to groundwater vulnerability were converted from vector (point, line, or polygon)
to raster (grid) of 30 m x 30 m grid resolution using the GIS as shown as Figure 2.
3.
- 567 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
(a)
(b)
Figure 3, (a) Groundwater vulnerability map and (b) Nitrate-N hazard map in shallow aquifer of
Kathmandu basin, Nepal
- 568 -
V u l n e r a b i lit y I n d e x
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
1
0 .9 5
0 .9
0 .8 5
R = 0 .5 2
0 .8
0 .7 5
0 .7
0 .6 5
0 .6
0 .5 5
0 .5
0
10
15
20
25
30
N it r at e -N (m g/ L )
180.00
160.00
Area (sq. km. )
140.00
120.00
100.00
99.31
80.00
60.00
40.00
21.70
20.00
0.00
No hazarad zone
Hazard zone
Veryhazard zone
Nitrate-N
(a)
(b)
Figure 5, (a) Nitrate-N hazard level, (b) Nitrate-N risk map of shallow aquifer of Kathmandu
basin
4.
Conclusions
The DRASTIC parameters were introduced to a hierarchical fuzzy inference system in order to
develop groundwater vulnerability map which helps to rank the highly vulnerable area or low
vulnerable area in the shallow groundwater aquifer of Kathmandu basin. The proposed
hierarchical fuzzy inference model in this study has become very useful in order to overcome
the problem of exponential increase in rules due to a large number of input variables results. In
addition to the development of groundwater vulnerability map, spatial distribution map of
- 569 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
nitrate has been developed to show the level of nitrate hazard in the study basin. The
combination of groundwater vulnerability and nitrate hazard maps can be used to identify areas
that currently are at risk and help identify areas where groundwater has been affected by human
activities. A significant positive correlation between nitrate concentration and the groundwater
vulnerability levels suggests that the groundwater vulnerability map of shallow groundwater
aquifer in Kathmandu basin was generally consistent with observed nitrate contamination near
the water table.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Afshar, A., Marino, M.A., Ebtehaj, M., & Moosavi, J. (2007). Rule-based fuzzy system
for assessing groundwater vulnerability. Journal of Environmental Engineering ASCE,
133(5), 532-540.
Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, H.J., Petty, J.R., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC; A
standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic
settings. USEPA-600/2- 87-035, 622 pp.
Babiker, I.S., Mohammed, A.A.M., Hiyama, T., & Kato, K. (2005). A GIS-based
DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights,
Gifu
Prefecture, central Japan. Science of the Total Environment, 345(1-3), 127140.
Dixon, B. (2005). Groundwater vulnerability mapping: a GIS and fuzzy rule based
integrated tool. Applied Geography, 25(4), 327-347.
Doerfliger N, Zwahlen F (1997) EPIK: a new method for outlining of protection areas in
karstic environment. Paper presented at International Symposium on karst waters and
environmental impacts, 1997.
Duarte, L., Teodoro, A. C., Gonalves, J. A., Dias, A. J. G., & Marques, J. E. (2014).
Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution through the DRASTIC Method.
In Computational Science and Its ApplicationsICCSA 2014 (pp. 386-400). Springer
International Publishing.
El-Naqa A (2004) Aquifer vulnerability assessment using the DRASTIC model at
Russeifa landfill, northeast Jordan. Environmental Geology Vol. 47: 51-62.
Foster, S.S.D. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and
protection strategy. Proceedings and information/TNO committee on hydrological
research 38, 36-86.
Fritch TG, McKnight CL, Yelderman JC, Arnold JG (2000) An aquifer vulnerability
assessment of the Paluxy aquifer, Central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified
DRASTIC approach. Environmental Management 25:337345
Kumar, S., Thirumalaivasan, D., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2014). GIS Based Assessment of
Groundwater Vulnerability Using Drastic Model. Arabian Journal for Science and
Engineering, 39(1), 207-216
Lynch SD, Reynders AG, Schulze RE (1997) A DRASTIC approach to groundwater
vulnerability in South Africa. South African Journal of Science Vol. 93: 5965.
- 570 -
Kathmandu, Nepal
November 20-21, 2014
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
International Symposium
Geohazards: Science, Engineering and Management
- 571 -