Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tools of Lateral Thinking by Aderonke Ogunsakin
Tools of Lateral Thinking by Aderonke Ogunsakin
Tools of Lateral Thinking by Aderonke Ogunsakin
By Aderonke S. Ogunsakin
ronky4success@gmail.com
Pan Atlantic University
Lagos, Nigeria
May 2014
Table of Contents
1.0
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2
2.0
PROVOCATION .................................................................................................................................. 2
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
3.0
CONCEPT ........................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
4.0
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................... 7
5.0
REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 7
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Lateral thinking can be defined as an indirect and creative approach of solving problems,
typically through viewing the problem in a new and unusual light (Oxford Dictionary). Lateral
thinking provokes fresh ideas and changes the frame of reference; it overcomes problems by
bypassing them through a radically different approach. According to Edward de Bono (2009),
lateral thinking means moving across patterns instead of moving along them the nature and the
logic of creativity.
There are various tools of lateral thinking, among which include: challenge, focus, concept,
provocation and movement. Provocation and concept shall be explored in this write up.
2.0
PROVOCATION
Provocation is a lateral thinking technique that disrupts established patterns of thinking, and
giving us new places to start. The human brain thinks by recognizing patterns and reacting to
them based on our past experiences and logical extensions of those experiences which is often a
result of our judgement. Traditional thinking makes much use of judgement, an idea is generated
which is accepted or rejected, making rapid use of our past experience and of others. Judgement
of assessment prevents us from making mistakes. Lateral thinking requires a different operation.
Instead of accepting or rejecting an idea you look at the idea in order to 'see where you can move
to'. This puts a very different sort of usefulness on ideas, Edward de Bono (2009).
Popularized by psychologist Edward de Bono, provocation is used by making deliberately wrong
or unreasonable statements (provocations) in which something taken for granted is not true.
Statements like cars moves on water or air floating bridges can be provocations, illogical and
outrageous; the needed impetus that shocks the mind out of existing way of thinking. Once such
provocative statements are made, judgement should be suspended and ideas should be generated
which becomes the starting point for brainstorming and creative thinking. Albert Einsteins
thought experiments is an example of provocations with such statements as 'What would I see
if I were travelling at the speed of light? Such statements can generate ideas such as what would
the visual perception at the speed of light be like? Can matter be contained at the speed of light?
Does speed play a role in the convertibility between matter and energy? These are new area of
thoughts that such mind imagination can lead to. This is activity de Bono called Provocative
Operations (PO).
Provocations unsettle the mind in order to increase the chance of generating new ideas. Safe
statements that are near logic will not get the full value of the provocations technique and at least
40% of the provocations will be completely unusable, it is therefore a painstaking exercise that
must be followed through, similar to Thomas Edisons incandescent light experiments.
2.1
There are steps involved in the use of provocations tool, stating by making shocking, illogical,
even outrageous statement about the problem you are solving, and then working back through
several steps.
You can focus on the difference between the provocation and the usual situation.
You can pick out the positive aspects and work with these.
You can imagine the provocation put into action and see what happens.
There are several other ways that you can create movement and ideas from your provocation.
Examine:
3.0
CONCEPT
This is a very important part of creative thinking. Concepts that are in use can be identified and
seek to find other ways to deliver same concept. There can be operational, functional,
descriptive, purpose and value concepts. Concept can be very broad or detailed almost to the
level of an idea. Concepts breed idea, as lateral thinking is all about generating an out of the
box idea or alternative idea away from the norm.
3.1
A good concept generation process will produce many ideas; concept generation is more than
just brainstorming. The following are ways of generating ideas from concepts.
We then move backwards (towards the right-hand side of the page) to list the more specific
concepts that could operate the broad concepts.
For 'reducing traffic' we might have: restrict the number of vehicles; discourage traffic;
reduce the need to travel; multi-user vehicles.
For 'improving traffic flow' we might have: deal with peak travel problem at beginning and
end of the day; remove junctions.
For 'increasing travel space' we might have: more roads; smaller vehicles.
We then take each of the specific concepts and see how this could be put into action with
specific ideas.
For 'restricting the number of vehicles' we might have: high entry tolls; vehicle purchase
permission auction (as in Singapore); special city access licences.
For 'discouraging traffic' we might have: high congestion charges for entering the city (as in
Lagos); no provision for parking; poor-quality roads; publicise poor traffic flow.
For 'reducing the need to travel' we might have: decentralise stores and offices; work from
home via Internet, etc.; work stations.
For 'multi-use transport' we might have: buses; trams; light rail; taxis; multi-user taxis.
The next broad concept was 'increasing traffic flow' and the concepts serving this could be
delivered as follows:
For 'remove peak traffic flow' we might have: staggered working hours; differential tolls; tax
incentives.
For 'remove junctions' we might have: overpasses and underpasses; roundabouts; a spiral
road layout.
The next broad concept was 'increasing travel space' and the concepts could be delivered as
follows:
For 'more roads' we could have: underground roads; elevated roads; using riverbanks.
For 'smaller vehicles' we could have: bicycles; lightweight motorcycles; very small cars, etc.
In this cascade effect, each point multiplies down to several points at the next level. It is very
important to keep the 'broad concepts' (directions) as broad as possible. Too often people put
specific concepts as broad concepts. These do not have the same multiplying effect.
Occasionally, it is useful to have yet another layer where the idea is made even more specific
(where do we place the overhead road?)
The Concept Fan can be done by an individual or by a group working together. It is a way of
generating alternatives through working downwards from very broad concepts.
4.0
CONCLUSION
Lateral thinking is a very useful way of generating novel ideas and using the tools and techniques
discussed above and others, especially as popularized by Edward de Bono will certainly aid in
idea generation in business, academia and almost any human endeavor.
5.0
REFERENCES