Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Usha Chowdhary - Self-Esteem, Age Identification, and Media Exposure of The Elderly and Their Relationship To
Usha Chowdhary - Self-Esteem, Age Identification, and Media Exposure of The Elderly and Their Relationship To
http://ctr.sagepub.com
Self-Esteem, Age Identification, and Media Exposure of the Elderly and their Relationship to
Fashionability
Usha Chowdhary
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 1988; 7; 23
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X8800700105
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://ctr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/1/23
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Clothing and Textiles Research Journal can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://ctr.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://ctr.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations (this article cites 28 articles hosted on the
SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms):
http://ctr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/7/1/23
Chowdhary
Abstract
The study examined the relationship between the fashionability of the elderly (65 and older) and its correlates.
Dillmans Total Design Method approach was executed to conduct the survey. Four hundred and thirty elderly men and
women participated in the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and t-tests. The
results indicated that significant differences existed between fashionability and media exposure for the female styles. No
differences were found between fashionability and age identification and self-esteem for either sex. However, the findings
did challenge some of the existing theories, which have been tested on younger populations.
consumers
has been
23
power
tested
The
younger populations.
majority of fashion research has centered around a
younger population and women (Chowdhary, 1984;
Polegato & Wall, 1980; Schrank & Gilmore, 1973;
Summers, 1970). Only three articles regarding clothing for
men are known to have been published (Baumgarten, 1975;
Behal, 1977; Darden & Reynolds, 1972). It is now time to
on
reported study.
Based
research
were
on
also examined.
construct
Figure
FEMALE OUTFITS
Figure
MALE OUTFITS
25
Factor analysis was executed to test the unidimensionality of the measures. Cronbachs alpha was used to test the
reliability of both developed and established measures. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to analyze the
data.
measure.
Results
population.
The findings revealed that two factors were extracted for
the self-esteem (Table 1 ) measure: positive and negative.
Two factors explained 57.2 % of the variance. Three factors
were extracted for the Media exposure (Table 2) measure:
consumer-dominated sources (which include other people as
analysis indicated that the elderly with high selfdid not differ from the elderly with low self-esteem in
relation to their fashionability as determined by their
response to both male and female outfits. However,
respondents were found to have enjoyed fairly high selfesteem (M=32.4). The total possible points one could
receive was 40. Hypothesis I was rejected. Although no
differences existed between the elderly who selected classic
versus latest styles, some differences were found when selfesteem was tested for the male and female respondents.
Male elderly (M=0.16) received significantly higher factor
scores than female elderly (M= -0.10) for the positive selfesteem factor (t 1403]
2.67, p<.01). However, the two
not
did
differ
for
the
groups
negative self-esteem factor.
The t-test results indicated that no difference was found
between the age perception of the elderly and their
fashionability. It was interesting to note that 68% of the
elderly perceived themselves as younger than their age, 28%
perceived themselves as the same as their age, and only 3%
perceived themselves as older than their age. Although the
concept of heterogeneity of the elderly population was
supported, its relationship to fashionability was not.
Hypothesis II was rejected.
Factor analysis of the media exposure measure yielded
three factors which were classified as consumer-dominated,
market-dominated, and neutral sources of fashion information (Table 3). Therefore, fashionability of male and female
outfits was examined for three different types of fashion
information sources. The findings from the t-test of the
female outfits revealed that the two groups differed
significantly in their use of consumer-dominated and
market-dominated sources of fashion information (Table 4).
However, the two groups did not differ in their use of neutral
sources of fashion information. Although the selection of
styles was found to be related to the media exposure for the
Data
esteem
by fashionability.
Discussion
+ factor
**
scores were
used for
analysis.
P<.Ol
p<.05
significant
factors of
measure.
+ Actual
used for
analysis.
**~<.01
*
p<.05
27
ego-support system.
Implications
~
28
..
References
Bader, I.M. (1963). An exploratory study of clothing problems and attitudes of a group of older women in Iowa City.
10, 3Supplement to the Bulletin "Adding Life to Years, "
6.
Keith, P. (1977), Life change, stereotyping and age identification. Psychological Reports, 41, 661-662.
Linn, M.W., & Hunter, K. (1979). Perception of age in the
elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 46-52.
Lumpkin, J.R., & Greenberg, B.A. (1982). Apparel shopping
patterns of the elderly consumers. Journal of Retailing,
58, 68-89.
716-717.
common
denominator between the young and old. The Gerontolnogist, 14, 437-439.
Hunter, K.I., Linn, M.W., & Harris, R. (1981-82). Characteristics of high and low self-esteem in the elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 14,
117-127.
Kaiser, S.B., & Chandler, J.L. (1982). Fashion information processing andfeelings of alienation: 50 plus adults
and the mass media. Paper presented at the meeting of
Pacific Sociological Association, San Diego, CA.
among three
adult groups in their attitude toward self and others. The
Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 275-279.
29
30