Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Market Research Report: Waste Management Market in India 2015 - Sample
Market Research Report: Waste Management Market in India 2015 - Sample
Market Research Report: Waste Management Market in India 2015 - Sample
February 2015
Executive Summary
Market
Drivers &
Challenges
Trends
Government
Initiatives
Waste management market in India was valued INR x bn in 2013 and is expected to reach INR y
bn by 2018
India is a growing market for waste management services as per capita waste generation is
increasing
Drivers:
Increasing Urbanization
Initiatives taken at corporate level
Government & NGOs Initiatives
Increased Awareness Regarding Environmental
Hazards
Operational Advantages in India
Challenges:
Lack of Collection and Segregation at
Source
Scarcity of Land
Lack of Interest amongst Consumers
Competition
Company A
Company B
Company C
Company D
Macroeconomic Indicators
Market Overview
Business Opportunities
Drivers & Challenges
Trends
Government Regulations
Competitive Landscape
Strategic Recommendations
Appendix
WASTE MANAGEMENT MARKET IN INDIA 2015.PPT
15
14 d1
c1
13 b1
c3
b3
a3
d2
c2
b2
a2
12 a1
11
Q1
Q2
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
Q3
2013-14
Q4
%
2.0
1.5
s
q
1.0
t
r
0.5
0.0
INR bn
grams/day
XX
E
D
a1
a2
a3
a4
a6
a5
D
C
B
B
A
0
2013
2014e
2015e
a5
2016e
2017e
2018e
a1
1971
a2
a3
a4
1981
1991
1997
2025e
5
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
a1
a2
a3
0
Generation
Collection
Treatment
MSW Composition
X
Organic Waste
Recyclable
SAMPLE
Transportation and
Logistics
XX
XX
XX
XX
Waste Management at
Dumpsite
XX
XX
Organization/financing
XX
XX
SAMPLE
Components In Value
Chain
Waste Recycling
Management of Waste at
Landfills
Impact
Developing countries, like India, are witnessing massive migration of population from rural
areas to urban areas
Post Independence era, while the population of India had grown three times, urban population
grew five times
About one-third of urban India lives in metropolitan cities which has a million plus population
Increasing urbanization has put pressure on facilities like transport services, housing and
drainage
SAMPLE
Population (mn)
2001
2011
2021e
2031e
2036e
2041e
Impact
SAMPLE
Precious metals and plastic which could have been recovered are more often than not destroyed
as segregation of wastes hasnt been done properly; e-wastes are dealt in a similar way as that
of municipal and biomedical wastes
Scarcity of Land
Years
City Equivalents
Impact
10
A handful of cities
account for the
majority of waste
generated
Mumbai generates nearly 61,000 tonnes of electronic waste per year followed by New Delhi, which generates
43,000 tonnes of waste
Bangalore ranks third in terms of e waste generation and produces nearly 37,000 tonnes of waste per year
SAMPLE
Cities are getting more and more crowded resulting in more generation of waste
Lot of people are migrating from villages to cities in search of jobs
Mumbai
a1
Kolkata
a2
Delhi
a3
Chennai
z
Metro Cities
Class A Cities
a4
Hyderabad
Others
Bengaluru
a5
a6
Note: Waste generation quantities in 2011; Class A cities: Population Range: 1,00,000 4,999,999
11
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
SAMPLE
Rules for Waste Management
Waste Types
Rules
Biomedical Waste
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
E Waste
XX
Hazardous Waste
XX
Batteries
XX
XX
WASTE MANAGEMENT MARKET IN INDIA 2015.PPT
12
Public Private
Partnership
xx
xx
Xx
Xx
Xx
xx
City/State
X
SAMPLE
PPP Initiative
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WASTE MANAGEMENT MARKET IN INDIA 2015.PPT
13
SAMPLE
Impact
XX
Impact
XX
Competitive Rivalry
Impact
XX
Impact
XX
X
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
X
Threat of Substitutes
Impact
XX
14
SAMPLE
Company A
XX
XX
EV/EBITDA (x)
XX
EV/Revenue (x)
XX
15
SAMPLE
Net Margin
a1
10
a2
c1
c2
0
-5
-10
b2
b1
Company A
Company B
Company C
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
16
XX
Tel No.
XX
Fax No.
XX
Website
XX
Year of
Incorporation
XX
Ticker Symbol
XX
Stock Exchange
XX
SAMPLE
Offices and Centres India
Mumbai
Head Office
Waste
Management
Services
Products/Services
XX
Key People
Name
Designation
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
17
SAMPLE
Financial Snapshot
Total Income
INR mn
300
Net Profit/Loss
INR mn
7.0
8
3.7
200
100
Key Ratios
167.6
172.8
3.0
6.4
220.0
285.1
6
4
2
2011
2012
2013
2014
Financial Summary
Particulars
y-o-y change
(2014-13)
2014
2013
2012
2011
-2.50
5.69%
8.19%
7.48%
8.61%
-1.86
1.05%
2.91%
2.14%
4.19%
-2.23
1.81%
4.04%
2.71%
5.10%
-1.02
0.95%
1.98%
1.35%
2.56%
-0.31
3.92%
4.23%
3.65%
4.43%
-23.46
17.04%
40.50%
Profitability Ratios
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Profit Before Tax Margin
Return on Equity
Return on Capital Employed
Return on Working Capital
Return on Assets
Return on Fixed Assets
-192.48% 24.43%
-0.32
2.74%
3.06%
2.69%
3.46%
-1.67
10.40%
12.07%
11.09%
127.34%
1.86
93.65%
91.79%
92.52%
91.39%
0.32
11.69%
11.38%
10.87%
7.80%
0.28
2.98%
2.70%
2.89%
0.99%
Cost Ratios
Value (30/12/2014)
631.53
780.857
0.31
116.22
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
20.42%
1.54
1.28
0.95
1.64
-12.23%
0.32
0.37
0.34
0.61
20.68%
0.50
0.42
0.52
0.27
Leverage Ratios
Debt to Equity Ratio
Debt to Capital Ratio
Interest Coverage Ratio
13.77%
0.33
0.29
0.34
0.21
-29.96%
2.13
3.04
2.59
8.71
11.41%
1.64
1.47
1.48
14.78
15.64%
0.43
0.37
0.36
0.40
-12.06%
0.94
1.06
1.45
1.11
-45.60%
2.68
4.93
-25.72
2.84
13.53%
0.54
0.48
0.42
0.48
Efficiency Ratios
Fixed Asset Turnover
Asset Turnover
Current Asset Turnover
Working Capital Turnover
Capital Employed Turnover
Improved
Decline
18
SAMPLE
100%
80%
60%
40%
80%
60%
40%
20%
20%
0%
0%
2014
100%
2012
Business Highlights
Description
News
Overview
XX
Future Plan
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Note: Due to lack of critical data, the graph could not be generated for the year 2014
19
SAMPLE
XX
XX
XX
XX
20
Corporate Address
XX
Tel No.
XX
Fax No.
XX
Website
XX
Year of Incorporation
XX
SAMPLE
Offices and Centres India
Ahmedabad
Head Office
Products/Services
Key People
Water and
Wastewater
Management
XX
Name
Designation
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
21
3,500,000
1,500,000
Total
SAMPLE
Ownership Structure
Corporate Bodies
Foreign holdings
30%
5,000,000
70%
22
SAMPLE
Financial Snapshot
Key Ratios
Total Income
Particulars
Net Profit/Loss
INR mn
INR mn
1000
27.7
800
20
2.3
600
400
200
40
-25.8
518.5
887.1
456.2
2010
2011
460.9
-49.1
2012
-20
-40
-60
2013
Financial Summary
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Profit Before Tax Margin
Return on Equity
Return on Capital Employed
Return on Working Capital
Return on Assets
Return on Fixed Assets
2011
2010
13.96
3.31%
-10.65%
0.51%
-4.98%
13.77
3.13%
-10.65%
0.51%
-4.98%
13.96
3.31%
-10.65%
0.51%
-4.98%
10.90
2.50%
-8.41%
0.41%
-6.67%
5.27
1.50%
-3.78%
0.28%
-4.39%
-16.05
4.89%
20.94%
0.37%
-4.22%
4.64
1.28%
-3.37%
0.28%
-3.34%
495.15
161.62% -333.53%
16.45%
-142.77%
-13.96
96.69%
110.65%
99.49%
104.98%
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
110.65%
1.54
0.73
4.68
6.09
223.13%
0.41
0.13
0.64
2.02
-37.34%
0.77
1.22
0.47
0.52
-21.13%
0.43
0.55
0.32
0.34
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
55.83%
48.81
31.32
32.02
28.69
21.86%
0.39
0.32
0.54
0.67
-28.39%
0.52
0.72
0.57
0.71
-175.09%
1.48
-1.97
0.72
0.85
1.07%
0.80
0.79
0.80
1.34
Cost Ratios
Operating costs (% of Sales)
Administration costs (% of
Sales)
Interest costs (% of Sales)
Liquidity Ratios
Leverage Ratios
2012
Profitability Ratios
y-o-y change
2013
(2013-12)
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
Debt to Capital Ratio
Interest Coverage Ratio
Efficiency Ratios
Fixed Asset Turnover
Asset Turnover
Current Asset Turnover
Working Capital Turnover
Capital Employed Turnover
Improved
Decline
23
SAMPLE
Business Highlights
Description
News
Overview
XX
Network
XX
Awards
XX
24
SAMPLE
XX
XX
XX
XX
25
26