Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Autoimmunity Reviews
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / a u t r ev

Review

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: An autoimmune disease?


A. Greco , M. Fusconi, A. Gallo, C. Marinelli, G.F. Macri, M. De Vincentiis
ENT Department, Hospital Policlinico Umberto I University of Rome, Sapienza, Italy

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Objectives: To review our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss,
including viral infection, vascular occlusion and immune system-mediated mechanisms, and to discuss the
pathogenesis as it relates to pharmacotherapy.
Systematic review methodology: Relevant publications on the pathogenesis of sudden sensorineural hearing
loss from 1944 to 2010 were analysed.
Results and conclusions: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is dened as hearing loss of 30 dB in three
sequential frequencies over 3 days or less. It can be an isolated symptom or the presenting symptom of a
systemic disease. The aetiology and pathogenesis remain unknown. Detailed investigation typically reveals a
specic cause in about 10% of patients. Proposed theories of causation include viral infections, vascular
occlusion and immune system-mediated mechanisms. A variety of therapies have been proposed based on
the various proposed aetiologies.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Article history:
Received 1 May 2011
Accepted 5 May 2011
Available online 18 May 2011
Keywords:
Measles virus
Hearing loss
Autoimmunity

Contents
1.

Introduction . . . . . . . . . .
1.1.
Aetiology . . . . . . . .
1.2.
Viral hypothesis . . . . .
1.3.
Vascular theory . . . . .
1.4.
Immunologic theory . . .
1.5.
Therapeutic considerations
2.
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . .
Take-home messages . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

1. Introduction
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss was described for the rst time
by De Klein in 1944, and it is dened as hearing loss of at least 30 dB in
three sequential frequencies in the standard pure tone audiogram
over 3 days or less [1]. It occurs abruptly and is a frightening
experience for patients.
The incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) has
been reported to range from 5 to 20 cases per 100,000 persons per
year [2]. British surveys have estimated between 5 and 30 cases per
100,000 per year [3,4]. However, a German study reported an
incidence of up to 160 cases per 100,000 per year [5]. The disease

Corresponding author at: P.zza Acilia no. 4, 00100 Rome, Italy. Tel.: +39 3355948375.
E-mail addresses: antonio.greco@uniroma1.it, giano1979@hotmail.com (A. Greco).
1568-9972/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2011.05.005

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

756
756
757
758
758
759
759
759
759

has a wide age distribution, with an average of 5060 years, but is


equally distributed between genders. The hearing loss is unilateral in
most cases, with bilateral involvement reported in less than 5% [6].
Tinnitus occurs in about 80% of patients, and vertigo in about 30% [7].
Up to 80% of patients report a feeling of aural fullness [8].
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss can be an isolated problem or
the presenting symptom of a systemic disease, such as Wegener's
granulomatosis [9], Sjogren's syndrome [10], relapsing polychondritis
[11], polyarteritis nodosa [12], systemic lupus erythematous [13] or
Behet's disease [14].
1.1. Aetiology
Although it has a high spontaneous recovery rate of 4065% [15],
the aetiology and pathogenesis of sudden deafness remains unknown
[16]. For this reason, SSHL remains one of the most controversial and

A. Greco et al. / Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761

challenging issues in otology. Detailed investigation show a specic


cause in about 10% of patients [17]. The term idiopathic sudden
sensorineural hearing loss is often used to describe the remainder of
patients.
Proposed theories of causation include viral infection [18], vascular
occlusion [19] and immune system-mediated mechanisms [20]. A
variety of medical and surgical therapies have been proposed over the
past several decades that have been based on these aetiologic
theories. Some of these therapies have resulted in signicant
morbidity or even mortality [21,22]. Therefore, elucidation of the
pathogenesis responsible for this enigmatic entity is vital if progress is
to be made in treating this condition.
1.2. Viral hypothesis
There are three mechanisms that have been proposed to explain
how a viral infection can lead to sudden sensorineural hearing loss
[23]. One possible mechanism is viral infection of the cochlea
(cochleitis) or of the cochlear nerve (neuritis). The virus is presumed
to reach the inner ear from haematogenous spread, although other
routes of spread are possible, such as from the cerebrospinal uid
space or from the middle ear.
The second proposed mechanism is reactivation of a latent viral
infection of the inner ear. The third mechanism by which a virus could
trigger SSHL is an indirect mechanism. This third mechanism involves
a systemic or distant viral infection that triggers an antibody response
that cross-reacts with an inner ear antigen. This is an example of the
immune system-mediated hypothesis. In this third scenario there is
not a direct viral attack on the inner ear.
The viral hypothesis of SSHL typically refers collectively to the
rst two mechanisms, which involve direct viral invasion of the inner
ear or reactivation of a latent virus within the ear. The mumps virus
has been reported to cause sudden deafness in clinical and serologic
studies [24,25]. However, many studies have found that mumps
infections accounted only for a small fraction (less than 10%) of cases
of SSHL [25,26]. Measles and rubella have also been associated with
sudden deafness [26,27].
With widespread immunisation against mumps, measles and
rubella viruses the incidence of these infections has fallen drastically
and SSHL due to these aetiologic agents has nearly been eradicated.
However, there has not been a concomitant decline in the overall
incidence of SSHL [28], further supporting the argument that these
particular viruses are not the primary cause of SSHL.
Members of the Herpesviridae family of viruses have been
proposed as a cause of SSHL [2931]. The herpes virus family includes
the following: herpes simplex types 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus

757

(VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), EpsteinBarr virus, and human


herpesviruses 6, 7 and 8 (HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8). All of these
viruses, once acquired, persist in their latent forms for the duration of
an infected person's life. Most adults are seropositive for several of
these viruses, having acquired them during childhood. These adults
are, therefore, not susceptible to new (acute), and SSHL in a
seropositive patient can only be explained by reactivation of latent
virus. Unfortunately, there are no reliable serologic tests to diagnose
reactivation. Once an individual is seropositive for a latent herpes
virus, an increase in his or her titre does not diagnose reactivation.
Other types of viruses, such as respiratory viruses, adenoviruses
and arenaviruses, have also been implicated in SSHL based on
anamnestic or serological data [18,26,28]. Pitkaranta and Julkunen
could not detect production of interferon or interferon-induced gene
expression in peripheral blood samples of patients with SSHL [32],
both of which are useful diagnostic markers for systemic viral
infections. Pitkaranta and Julkunen's study is signicant because it
did not target specic viruses, but rather it assayed for sensitive
markers of a systemic viral infection in general. Their study supports
the argument that SSHL is not commonly associated with a systemic
viral infection.
Westmore et al. [33] were able to isolate live mumps virus from
the perilymph of a young woman who presented with SSHL after
mumps parotitis. This is the only report that has demonstrated a
direct role of a virus as a causative agent in SSHL. Not all cases of
mumps-induced sensorineural hearing loss occur after mumps
parotitis [34,35]. In a study of meningitis and hearing loss [36],
Nadol did not nd hearing loss in any of 304 patients with viral
meningitis. Given the close communication between CSF and inner
ear uids, this lack of association argues against one specic group of
viruses, the enteroviruses, as the aetiology of SSHL. Enteroviruses
(e.g., coxsackievirus, echovirus, etc.) are the causative agents of 90% of
cases of viral meningitis [37].
A number of reports have described the histopathological ndings
in the temporal bones of patients who had SSHL during their lifetime
[21,22,38,39] (see Fig. 1). In all these studies, evidence of viral
infections of the inner ear was lacking. Evidence of viral infection
includes the following: isolation of a virus from the labyrinth,
demonstration of typical viral cytopathological abnormalities, demonstration of viral particles by electron microscopy, or identication
of specic viral antigens.
Many studies have been performed using direct inoculation of
pathogenic viruses into the inner ears of experimental animals to
study SSHL. Unfortunately, these studies have not replicated the
clinical or histopathological features observed in patients with SSHL
[40]. In many studies, viral inoculation resulted in a progressive form

Fig. 1. Photomicrographs of cochleas. A cochlea in patient with sensorineural hearing loss with decrease in spiral ganglion. B normal cochlea. Picture taken from: Vasama JP,
Linthicum FH. Idiopatic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: temporal bone hystopathologic study. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol 109: 2000. 527532.

758

A. Greco et al. / Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761

of hearing loss, rather than a sudden onset of the disorder. Moreover,


the histopathological ndings within the cochlea were characterised
by leukocytic inltration, haemorrhage and degeneration of sensory
and neural structures, followed by brosis and new bone formation in
some cases [41,42]. In other studies, experimental inoculation of
viruses into the labyrinth had little or no pathogenic effects [43,44].
1.3. Vascular theory
Vascular occlusion has been proposed as a mechanism for sudden
deafness [45] based on the catastrophic nature of the event, which is
similar to a thromboembolic stroke. However, the many clinical and
experimental observations reported in the literature do not support a
vascular aetiology of SSHL. Thromboembolic events could be expected
to be more common in elderly patients with SSHL, but this is not the
case [46]. Furthermore, SSHL frequently occurs in young, healthy
people.
The labyrinthine artery is a terminal artery that supplies both the
cochlea and the vestibular sensory organ [47]. Therefore, it is difcult
to explain cases of SSHL without vertigo using the vascular theory.
Experimental compromise of the cochlear blood supply results in an
irreversible hearing loss after 1 h of occlusion, even if blood ow is
restored subsequently [48]. In contrast, patients with SSHL may
experience recovery of function over the course of days to weeks. In
addition, the hallmark of a vascular insult to the cochlea consists of
deposition of connective tissue and new bone within the cochlea
[49,50]. (see Fig. 2). However, connective tissue and new bone was
found in only 1 of 17 cases in a temporal bone collection [51] and has
been reported in only 2 of 29 patients with SSHL in the literature
[52,53]. Under physiological conditions, blood supply to the inner ear
is provided by the labyrinthine artery, which is a functional end artery
of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA).
Recent studies [54] have shown the involvement of genetic
mutations associated with thrombotic, micro-angiopathic disorders
in the development of SSHL. It has been suggested that congenital
and/or acquired thrombophilia may have a pathogenic role in the
development of SSHL. Congenital thrombophilias are represented by
well-described gene polymorphisms, such as factor V Leiden, which is
characterised by a G169 A mutation. Other known polymorphisms
that have already been studied include a mutated prothrombin
characterised by G 2021 A in the promoter region of the gene.
The most common acquired thrombophilia is characterised by the
presence of lupus anticoagulant or antiphospholipid antibodies.

Fig. 2. Midmodiolar section showing complete degeneration of sensory and neural


structures with replacement by brous tissue and new bone. The cochlear duct is not
affected in the lower basal turn, where hair cells are present with innervating dendrites.
Picture taken from: Saumil NM, Joe CA, Nadol JB. Pathology and pathophysiology of
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otology & Neurotology 2005; 26:151160.

Hyperhomocysteinemia is another condition that predisposes to the


development of arteriovenous thrombosis that may be genetic (i.e.,
MTHFR C677T homozygosity, homocystinuria) or acquired (e.g.,
eating disorders, thyroid disorders, kidney disease) [55]. The blood
ow in the labyrinthine artery is regulated by adrenergic receptors,
particularly in the smooth muscle cells of the modiolus. Distal blood
ow is poorly regulated and strongly dependent on plasma viscosity
and platelet function.
Recently, it was reported that LDL and brinogen apheresis
treatment improves outcomes in patients with SSHL, suggesting
that vascular factors may play a greater role in the pathogenesis of
SSHL than was previously assumed [56,57]. Fibrinogen is a major
determinant of plasma viscosity; elevated brinogen levels are
associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and atherothrombotic disease [58,59]. Reduction in the level of LDL results in more
efcient release of nitric oxide, the main mediator of blood vessel
diameter, and reduces platelet aggregation potential [60,61].
Increased LDL and reduced HDL cholesterol plasma concentrations
are amongst the most predictive coronary risk factors [62]. However,
patients with SSHL had neither elevated LDL cholesterol levels nor
reduced HDL cholesterol levels. Fibrinogen concentrations have been
reported to be increased in SSHL patients [63]. Higher brinogen
levels may contribute to SSHL by increasing the plasma viscosity and
enhancing platelet activity [64].
Some authors have found that the risk of stroke was 1.6 times
greater among SSHL patients, and the risk was particularly high for
strokes involving the AICA [65]. Therefore, SSHL may be a predictor of
subsequent stroke, a fact that has important clinical implications for
the care of SSHL patients [66]. Some authors suggest that SSHL
patients, particularly those who are elderly or have other vascular
conditions, should undergo haematological and neurological examinations to help clinicians identify those who are potentially at risk for
stroke in the near future [67].
1.4. Immunologic theory
The immunologic hypothesis is based on the theory that
circulating antibodies cross-react with inner ear antigens [68,69] or
activated T cells, thereby damaging the inner ear [69]. Such antibodies
may be triggered by viruses or other agents. A number of inner ear
antigens have been proposed as targets of such antibodies, including
type 2 collagen [70], Beta-actin [71], Cochlin [72,73] and Beta-tectorin
[73]. The best documented of these antibodies is against choline
transporter-like protein 2 (CTL2), an inner ear glycoprotein [74]. Out
of a group of 20 patients with SSHL, 9 were found to have antibodies
against CTL2 [75]. In Cogan's syndrome, immunoglobulins against a
supporting cell protein (DEP-1/CD148) and connexin 26 (a gap
junction protein) have been detected within the sensory epithelia of
the inner ear, and these antibodies led to sensorineural hearing loss in
mice [76].
In patients with SSHL, autoantibodies against antigens of the inner
ear, like types 2 and 9 collagen [77,78], P30 [72] and P80 cochlear
proteins [68], cardiolipin [79], serotonin and ganglioside [80], have
been detected. In addition, reductions in the T lymphocyte subpopulations C3, C4 and C8 [81,82] and an increase in the level of C3bc
complement factor [83] have been found in patients with SSHL. Antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are a heterogeneous group of
antibodies directed against endothelial cells. They have been detected
in several diseases that all involve vessel wall damage [84]. There is an
increasing body of evidence that AECAs might play a role in triggering
autoimmune vascular diseases. In fact, experimental in vitro and in
vivo models have supported a pathogenic role for AECAs in sustaining
immune-mediated vessel damage.
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies have been described in a variety of
diseases, including connective tissue disorders and systemic vasculitis
[85,86]. Some authors have reported the presence of serum anti-

A. Greco et al. / Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761

endothelial cell autoantibodies in patients with SSHL [87]. The


relationship between the inner ear and the immune system was
originally established by McCabe [88], who described a clinical entity
characterised by steroid-responsive, rapidly-progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Serological evidence supporting the involvement of
the immune system in SSHL was provided by Harris and Sharp [89],
who found circulating antibodies against several cochlear antigens in
patients with idiopathic, progressive, bilateral sensorineural hearing
loss (IPBSNHL). One of these antigens is a 68-kDa protein that was
originally believed to be specic to the inner ear but was later
identied as heat shock protein-70 (HSP70), which is also expressed
in other tissues [9092]. Anti-HSP70 antibodies have been reported to
occur in 10.519% of patients with SSHL [93,94].
Previous publications have established an association between
SSNHL and autoantibodies directed against phospholipids (anti-PLs)
in systemic lupus erythematosus patients [95,96]. These autoantibodies,
mainly anti-cardiolipin (anti-CL) and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 (antibeta-2-GP1), are associated with thrombotic phenomena in antiphospholipid syndromes (APSs) and are considered pro-atherogenic. AntiPL antibodies have a pathogenic effect on platelets and vascular
endothelial cells, resulting in vaso-occlusive manifestations. The actual
targets of the anti-PLs antibodies are cardiolipin and the binding protein
cofactor beta-2-GP-1 (also called apolipoprotein H).
It has been suggested that these autoantibodies induce thrombosis
in the labyrinthine vessels, thereby causing subsequent damage to the
inner ear that results in SNHL [95]. Anti-CL and anti-beta-2-GP-1
antibodies have been detected in 12.931% and 6.612% of patients
with SSHL, respectively [9799]. Another study has reported anti-PL
(33.3%) and anti-HSP70 (25.4%) antibodies in SNHL patients [100].
Velmann found anti-HSP70 antibodies in 40% of SNHL patients [101].
Anti-PL antibodies can be induced by human viruses [102,103]. Viral
peptides trigger an immune response and, as a result, lead to the
development of pathogenic anti-PL antibodies, particularly in predisposed individuals.
A similar mechanism may underlie the production of anti-PL
antibodies in idiopathic SNHL patients. Acute obstruction of the small
vessels of the labyrinthine circulation is one possible cause of SNHL,
and such a mechanism would account for its immediate onset. The
dissolution of a thrombus and reperfusion of the labyrinthine vessel
hours or days after the thrombotic event might offer a partial
explanation of the clinical course of the SNHL [104]. HSPs are
ubiquitous proteins in phylogeny, and their presence in a diverse
array of species, including microorganisms, may increase the
possibility of an immune response to microbial HSPs that can crossreact with human HSPs [105,106]. However, further studies are
necessary in order to clarify the immunologic role of antibodies found
in SNHL patients and their impact on the treatment of these patients.
1.5. Therapeutic considerations
In most cases of SNHL, no specic cause is identied, and the
following empirical treatments can be considered. Oral corticosteroids
are widely used, and their main effect is suppression of the inner ear's
immune response [106,107]. Patients can be treated with a short course
of oral prednisolone (e.g., 1 mg/kg per day or a maximum of 60 mg daily
for adults for 10 days) [107]. Although the greatest extent of hearing
recovery occurs when corticosteroid therapy is initiated 12 weeks after
the onset of symptoms, a response to prednisolone started as late as
2 months after SNHL onset has been reported [108].
Intra-tympanic dexamethasone has been used as an experimental
therapy in patients with SSHL because it achieves a high concentration
of steroids in the labyrinth in animal models [109] In a multi-centre,
randomised controlled trial [110], methotrexate was no more
effective than placebo in patients with progressive bilateral hearing
loss [111]. Case reports have shown benets to using immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate

759

mofetil) in patients with progressive sensorineural hearing loss, but


no studies have studied these drugs in patients with sudden
sensorineural hearing loss. In cases in which a vascular cause cannot
be excluded, a low dose of oral aspirin may be benecial [112]. To our
knowledge, there is little evidence supporting the use of heparin and
intravenous thrombolytics in SNHL [113].
A systematic review showed no benets to using hyperbaric
oxygen therapy for the treatment of SNHL [114]. Treatment with
carbogen, a gaseous mixture of 5% carbon dioxide and 95% oxygen, has
been investigated and found to have variable benets [115]. Several
other treatments have been investigated because of speculation about
the pathogenesis of SNHL. Treatment with antiviral agents (e.g.,
acyclovir, valacyclovir) has not shown benet in randomised
controlled trials [116].
2. Conclusions
We reviewed the most important theories of causation of sudden
sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on the immunologic
theory. We analysed the published evidence for and against the
various theories. The evidence indicates that viral and vascular
aetiologies can, in some cases, lead to sudden deafness. However,
the published evidence supports the idea that the immunologic
theory is a more common cause. Therefore, we recommend that
patients with idiopathic SNHL should be treated with corticosteroids
or immunosuppressants.
There is much that remains to be understood about the pathogenesis
of SSNHL, and more clinical trials are necessary to establish evidencebased treatments. Further studies are necessary to identify and clarify
the immunologic role of antibodies found in SNHL patients and their
impact on the treatment of the disease.
Take-home messages
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is an autoimmune disease. Its
pathogenesis includes viral infection and vascular disorders.
Due to the possible autoimmune pathogenesis of the disease,
pharmacotherapy for sudden SNHL may include corticosteroids and
immunosuppressants. The use of antiviral agents aligns with the
viral hypothesis, and low-dose aspirin and carbogen align with the
vascular theory.
References
[1] De Kleyn A. Sudden complete or partial loss of function of the octavus-system in
apparently normal persons. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1944;32:40729.
[2] Cadoni G, Agostino S, Manna R, De Santis A, Fetoni AR, Vulpiani P, et al. Clinical
association of serum antiendothelial cell antibodies in patients with sudden
sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2003;113:797801.
[3] Wu CS, Lin HC, Chao PZ. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: evidence from
Taiwan. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:1516.
[4] Teranishi M, Katayama N, Uchida Y, Tominaga M, Nakashima T. Thirty-year
trends in sudden deafness from four nationwide epidemiological surveys in
Japan. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:125965.
[5] Klemm E, Deutscher A, Mosges R. A present investigation of the epidemiologyin
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (in German). Laryngorhinootologie
2009;88:5247.
[6] Oh JH, Park K, Lee SJ, Shin JR, Choung YH. Bilateral versus unilateral sudden
sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:8791.
[7] Nosrati-Zarenoe R, Arlinger S, Hultcrantz E. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural
hearing loss: results drawn from the Swedish national database. Acta Otolaryngol
2007;127:116875.
[8] Sakata T, Kato T. Feeling of ear fullness in acute sensorineural hearing loss. Acta
Otolaryngol 2006;126:82833.
[9] Kempf HG. Ear involvement in Wegener's granulomatosis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied
Sci 1989;14:4516.
[10] Garcia Berrocal JR, Arellano B, Vargas JA, Trinidad A, Ramirez Camacho R, Vergara
J. Immune mediated inner ear disease: report of clinical cases. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1997;48:56570.
[11] Kumakiri K, Sakamoto T, Karahashi T, Mineta H, Takebayashi S. Acase of relapsing
polychondritis preceded by inner ear involvement. Auris Nasus Larynx 2005;32:
716.

760

A. Greco et al. / Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761

[12] Rowe-Jones JM, Macallan DC, Sorooshian M. Polyarteritis Nodosa presenting as


bilateral sudden onset cochleo-vestibular failure in a young woman. J Laryngol
Otol 1990;104:5624.
[13] Roverano S, Cassano G, Paira S, et al. Asymptomatic sensorineural hearing loss in
patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Rheumatol 2006;12:21720.
[14] Pollak L, Luxon LM, Haskard DO. Labyrinthine involvement in Behcet's syndrome.
J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:5229.
[15] Lin HC, Lee HC, Chao PZ. The effects of weather on the incidence of sudden
sensorineural hearing loss: a 5-year population-based study. Audiol Neurootol
2006;11:16571.
[16] Merchant SN, Durand ML, Adams JC. Sudden deafness: is it viral? ORL 2008;70:
5262.
[17] Penido NO, Cruz OL, Zanoni A, Inoue DP. Classication and hearing evolution of
patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Med Biol Res 2009;42:7126.
[18] Van Dishoeck H, Bierman T. Sudden perceptive deafness and viral infection
(report of the rst one hundred patients). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1957;66:
96380.
[19] Rasmussen H. Sudden deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 1949;37:6570.
[20] Veldman JE. Cochlear and retrocochlear immune-mediated inner ear disorders.
Pathogenetic mechanisms and diagnostic tools. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1986;95:53540.
[21] Schuknect HF, Kimura RS, Naufal PM. The pathology of sudden deafness. Acta
Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973;76:7597.
[22] Schuknect HF, Donovan ED. The pathology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural
hearing loss. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1986;243:115.
[23] Wilson WR. The relationship of the herpes-virus family to sudden hearing loss: a
prospective clinical study and literature review. Laryngoscope 1986;96:8707.
[24] Vuori M, Lahikainen EA, Peltonen T. Perceptive deafness in connection with
mumps. A study of 298 servicemen suffering from mumps. Acta Otolaryngol
1962;55:2316.
[25] Okamoto M, Shitara T, Nakamaya M, Takamiya H, Nishiyama K, Ono Y, et al.
Sudden deafness accompanied by asymptomatic mumps. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl
1994;514:458.
[26] Veltri RW, Wilson WR, Sprinkle PM, Rodman SM, Kavesh DA. The implication of
viruses in idiopathic sudden hearing loss: primary infection or reactivation of
latent viruses? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;89:13741.
[27] Kobayashi H, Suzuki A, Nomura Y. Unilateral hearing loss following rubella
infection in an adult. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;514:4951.
[28] Pitkaranta A, Vasama JP, Julkunen I. Sudden defness and viral infections.
Otorhinolaryngol Nova 1999;9:1907.
[29] Wilson WR. The relationship of the herpes-virus family to sudden hearing loss: a
prospective clinical study and literature review. Laryngoscope 1986;96:8707.
[30] Koide J, Yanagita N, Hondo R, Kurata T. Serological and clinical study of herpes
simplex virus infection in patients with sudden deafness. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl
1988;456:216.
[31] Takasaki T, Higashikawa M, Motoyama S, Sugita K, Kurane I. Serum antibodies to
human herpes virus 7, human herpesvirus 6, and cytomegalovirus in patients with
idiopathic facial nerve palsy or sudden deafness. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:61721.
[32] Pitakanta A, Julkunen I. Sudden deafness: lack of evidence for systemic viral
infection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:3979.
[33] Westmore GA, Pickard BH, Stern H. Isolation of mumps virus from the inner ear
after sudden deafness. BMJ 1979;1:145.
[34] Nomura Y, Harada T, SaHata H, Sugiura A. Sudden deafness and asymptomatic
mumps. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1988;456:911.
[35] Azimi PH, Cramblett HG, Haynes RE. Mumps meningoencephalitis in children.
JAMA 1969;207:50912.
[36] Nadol Jr JB. Hearing loss a sequela of meningitis. Laringoscope 1978;88:73955.
[37] Modlin JF. Coxackieviruses,echoviruses and newer enteriviruses. Mandell,
Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. ed 6.
Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 214861.
[38] Schuknecht HF, Benitez J, Beekhius J, Igarashi M, Singleton G, Ruedi L. The
pathology of sudden deafness. Laryngoscope 1962;72:114257.
[39] Vasama JP, Linthicum Jr FH. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss:
temporal bone histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:
52732.
[40] Khetarpal U, Nadol Jr JB, Glynn RJ. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
and postnatal viral labyrinthitis: a statistical comparison of temporal bone
ndings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:96976.
[41] Woolf NK, Harris JP, Ryan AF, Butler DM, Richman DD. Hearing loss in
experimental cytomegalovirus infection of the guinea pig inner ear: prevention
by systemic immunity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94:3506.
[42] Stokroos RJ, Albers FWJ, Schirm J. The etiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural
hearing loss: experimental herpes simplex virus infection of the inner ear. Am J
Otol 1998;19:44752.
[43] Karmody CS. Viral labyrinthitis. An experimental study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1975;84:17981.
[44] Tanaka K, Hirai T, Suenaga T, Terayama Y, Fukuda S, Matsumiya H. Experimental
Sendai virus-induced labyrinthitis in guinea pigs: an ultrastructural study of
cochlear lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93:2406.
[45] Rasmussen H. Sudden deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 1949;37:6570.
[46] Mattox DE, Simmons FB. Natural history of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977;86:46380.
[47] Schuknecht HF. Pathology of the Ear. ed 2. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1993.
p. 672.
[48] Perlman HB, Kimura RS, Fernandez C. Experiments on temporary occlusion of the
internal auditory artery. Laryngoscope 1959;69:591613.

[49] Perlman HB, Kimura R. Experimental obstruction of the venous drainageand


arterial supply of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1957;66:53746.
[50] Belal A. The effects of vascular occlusion on the human inner ear. J Laryngol Otol
1979;93:95568.
[51] Merchant SN, Adams JC, Nadol JB. Pathology and pathophysiology of idiopathic
sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:15160.
[52] Beal DD, Hemenway WG, Lindsay JR. Inner ear pathology of sudden deafness.
Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:5918.
[53] Vasama JP, Linthicum Jr FH. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: temporal
bone histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:52732.
[54] Fusconi M, Chistolini A, Angelosanto N, Pignoloni P, Tombolini M, De Virgilio A,
et al. Role of genetic and acquired prothrombotic risk factors in genesis of sudden
sensorineural hearing loss. Audio Neurotol 2010.
[55] Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, et al. A
candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 1995;10:1113.
[56] Suckfull M. Fibrinogen and LDL apheresis in treatment of sudden hearing loss: a
randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2002;360:18117.
[57] Ullrich H, Kleinjung T, Steffens T, et al. Improved treatment of sudden hearing
loss by specic brinogen aphaeresis. J Clin Apheresis 2004;19:718.
[58] Franco F. Gene polymorphisms of the haemostatic system and the risk of arterial
thrombotic disease. Br J Haematol 2001;115:491506.
[59] Maresca G, Di Blasio A, Marchioli R, et al. Measuring plasma brinogen to predict
stroke and myocardial infarction: an update. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
1999;19:136877.
[60] John S, Schlaich M, Langefeld M, et al. Increased bioavailability of nitric oxide
after lipid-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients: a randomized,
placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Circulation 1998;98:2116.
[61] Surya I, Akkerman J-W. The inuence of lipoproteins on blood platelets. Am Heart
J 1993;125:2725.
[62] Assmann G, Cullen P, Schulte H. Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of
acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective
cardiovascular Munster(PROCAM) study. Circulation 2002;105:3105.
[63] Rudack C, Langer C, Stoll W, Rust S, Walter M. Vascular risk factors in sudden
hearing loss. Thromb Haemost 2006;95:45461.
[64] Lisman T, Weeterings C, de Groot PG. Platelet aggregation: involvement of
thrombin and brin(ogen). Front Biosci 2005;10:250417.
[65] Patzak MJ, Demuth K, Kehl R, Lindner A. Sudden hearing loss as the leading
symptom of an infarction of the left anterior inferior cerebellar artery. HNO
2005;53:7979.
[66] Lee H, Cho JW. Auditory disturbance as a prodrome of anterior inferior cerebellar
artery infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:16448.
[67] Lin HC, Chao PZ, Lee HC. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss increases the risk of
stroke: a 5-year follow-up study. Stroke 2008;39:27448.
[68] Veldman JE, Hanada T, Meeuwsen F. Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas in
rapidly progressive sensorineural hearing loss and sudden deafness. Acta
Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993;113:3036.
[69] Garcia Berrocal JR, Ramirez-Camacho R. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss:
supporting the immunologic theory. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:98997.
[70] Yoo TJ, Tomoda H, Hernandez AD. Type II collagen-induced autoimmune inner
ear lesions in guinea pigs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;113:35.
[71] Boulassel MR, Tomasi JP, Deggouj N, Gersdorff M. Identication of beta-actin as a
candidate autoantigen in autoimmune inner ear disease. Clin Otolaryngol Allied
Sci 2000;25:53541.
[72] Boulassel MR, Deggouj N, Tomasi JP, Gersdorff M. Inner ear autoantibodies and
their targets in patients with autoimmune inner ear diseases. Acta Otolaryngol
2001;121:2834.
[73] Solares CA, Edling AE, Johnson JM, Baek MJ, Hirose K, Hughes GB, et al. Murine
autoimmune hearing loss mediated by CD4+ T cells specic for inner ear
peptides. J Clin Invest 2004;113:12107.
[74] Nair TS, Kozma KE, Hoeing NL, Kommareddi PK, Ueda Y, Gong TW, et al.
Identication and characterization of choline transporter-like-protein 2, an inner
ear glycoprotein of 68 and 72 kDa that is the target of antibody-induced hearing
loss. J Neurosci 2004;24:17729.
[75] Disher MJ, Ramakrishan A, Nair TS, Miller JM, Telian SA, Arts HA, et al. Human
autoantibodies and monoclonal antibody KHRI 3 bind to a phylogenetically
conserved inner-ear-supporting cell antigen. Ann NY Acad Sci 1997;830:25365.
[76] Lunardi C, Bason C, Leandri M, et al. Autoantibodies to inner ear and endothelial
antigens in Cogan's syndrome. Lancet 2002;360:91521.
[77] Yoo TJ, Tomoda K, Stuart JM, Cremer MA, Townes AS, Kang AH. Type II collagen
induced autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction in
rats. Ann Otolo Rhinol Laryngol 1983;92:26771.
[78] Joliat T, Seyer J, Bernstein J, et al. Antibodies against a 30kDA cochlear protein and
type II and type IX collagens in the serum of patients with inner ear disease. Ann
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:10006.
[79] Toubi E, Ben-David J, Kessel A, Podoshin L, Golan TD. Autoimmune aberration in
sudden sensorineural hearing loss: association with anti-cardiolipin antibodies.
Lupus 1997;6:5402.
[80] Heller U, Becker EW, Zenner HP, Berg PA. Incidence and clinical relevance of
antibodies to phospholipids, serotonin and ganglioside in patients with sudden
deafness and progressive inner ear hearing loss. HNO 1998;46:5836.
[81] Mayot D, Bene MC, Dron K, Perrin C, Faure GC. Immunologic alterations in
patients with sensorineural hearing disorders. Clin Immunol Immunopathol
1993;68:415.
[82] Garcia Berrocal JR, Ramirez Camacho R. Immune response and immunopathology
of the inner ear: an update. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:1017.

A. Greco et al. / Autoimmunity Reviews 10 (2011) 756761


[83] Nordang L, Laurent C, Mollnes TE. Complement activation in sudden deafness.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:6336.
[84] Belizna C, Cohen Tervaert JW. Specicity, pathogenicity and clinical value of
antiendothelial cell antibodies. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997;27:98109.
[85] Belizna C, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2000;27:98109.
[86] Meroni PL, D'Cruz D, Khamashta M, Youinou O, Hughes GRV. Anti-endothelial cell
antibodies: only for scientists or for clinicians too ? Clin Exp Immunol 1996;104:
199202.
[87] Ottaviani F, Cadoni G, Marinelli M, et al. Anti-endothelial autoantibodies in
patients with sudden hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1999;109:10847.
[88] McCabe BF. Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
1979;88:5859.
[89] Harris JP, Sharp PA. Inner ear autoantibodies in patients with rapidly progressive
sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1990;100:51624.
[90] Billings PB, Keithley EM, Harris JP. Evidence linking the 68 kilodalton antigen
identicated in progressive sensorineural hearing loss patient sera with heat
shock protein 70. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;104:10188.
[91] Bloch DB, San Martin JE, Rauch SD, Moscicki RA, Bloch KJ. Serum antibodies to heatshock protein 70 in sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 1995;121:116771.
[92] Bloch DB, Gutierrez JA, Guerriero Jr V, Rauch SD, Bloch KJ. Recognition of a
dominant epitope in bovine heat-shock protein 70 in inner ear disease.
Laryngoscope 1999;109:6215.
[93] Garcia Berrocal JR, Ramirez-Camacho R, Arellano B, Vargas JA. Validity of the
Western blot immunoassay for heat shock protein-70 in associated and isolated
immunorelated inner ear disease. Laryngoscope 2002;112:3049.
[94] Samuelsson AK, Hyden D, Roberg M, Skogh T. Evaluation of anti-hsp 70 antibody
screening in sudden deafness. Ear Hear 2003;24:2335.
[95] Hisashi K, Komune S, Taira T, Uemura T, Sadoshima S, Tsuda H. Anticardiolipin
antibody-induced sudden profound sensorineural hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol
1993;14:2757.
[96] Naarendorp M, Spiera H. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with
systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like syndromes and antiphospholipid
antibodies. J Rheumatol 1998;25:58992.
[97] Marcucci R, Alessandro Liotta A, Cellai AP, Rogolino A, Berloco P, Leprini E, et al.
Cardiovascular and thrombophilic risk factors for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:92934.
[98] Bachor E, Kremmer S, Kreuzfelder E, Jahnke K, Seidamadi S. Antophospholipid
antibodies in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
2005;262:6226.
[99] Toubi E, Ben-David J, Kessel A, Halas K, Sabo E, Luntz M. Immune-mediated
disorders associated with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol
Rhinol Laryngol 2004;113:4459.

761

[100] Gross M, Eliashar R, Ben-Yaakov A, Ulmanski R. Prevalence and clinical


signicance of anticardiolipin, anti-beta2-glycoprotein, and anti-heat shock
protein autoantibodies in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Audio Neurotol
2008;13:2318.
[101] Veldmann JE. Immune mediated sensorineural hearing loss with or without
endolymphatic hydrops: a clinical and experimental approach. Ann N Y Acad Sci
1997;830:17986.
[102] Gharavi AE, Pierangeli SS. Origino of antiphospholipid antibodies: induction of
aPL by viral peptides. Lupus 1998;7(suppl 2):S524.
[103] Shoenfeld Y, Blank M, Cervera R, Font J, Raschi E, Meroni PL. Infectious origino f
the antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:26.
[104] Byl Jr FM. Sudden hearing loss: eight years' experience and suggested prognostic
table. Laryngoscope 1984;94:64761.
[105] Kaufmann S. Heat shock proteins and immune response. Immunol Today
1990;11:129-13.
[106] Kaufmann S. Heat shock proteins and autoimmunity: a critical appraisal. Int Arch
Allergy Immunol 1994;103:31722.
[107] Mort DJ, Bronstein AM. Sudden deafness. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:13.
[108] Hughes GB, Kinney SE, Barna BP, Calabrese LH. Pratical versus theoretical
management of autoimmune inner ear disease. Laryngoscope 1984;94:75867.
[109] Parnes LS, Sun AH, Freeman DJ. Corticosteroid pharmacokinetics in the inner ear
uids: an animal study followed by clinical application. Laryngoscope 1999;109:
117.
[110] Harris JP, Weismann MH, Derebery JM, et al. Treatment of corticosteroidresponsive autoimmune inner ear disease with methotrexate: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:187583.
[111] Broughton SS, Meyerhoff WE, Cohen SB. Immune-mediated inner ear disease:
10-year experience. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2004;34:5448.
[112] Yue WL, Li P, Qi PJ, Li HJ, Zhou H. Role of low- molecular- weigth heparins in the
treatment of sudden hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 2003;24:32833.
[113] Mora R, Dellepiane M, Mora F, Jankowska B. The use of recombinant tissue-type
plasminogen activator for the treatment of sudden and chronic hearing loss. Int
Tinnitus J 2005;11:1814.
[114] Bennett MH, Kertesz T, Yeung P. Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden
sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:
CD004739.
[115] Cinamon U, Bendet E, Kronenberg J. Steroids, carbogen or placebo for sudden
hearing loss: a prospective double-blind study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryol
2001;258:47780.
[116] Conlin AE, Parnes LS. Treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: II. A Metaanalysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:5826.

Is SF-36 a reliable outcome of neurophychiatric events in patients affected with systemic lupus erythematosus?
Neuropsychiatric events in patients affected with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represent a poor prognostic factor and until now none
of the known approaches for the outcome assessment of these patients, such as neuroimaging alone or in combination with clinical variable
have been validated.
The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) proposes the short form SF-36 as reliable outcome measure for the study of
neuropsychiatric events in SLE patients (Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 50:961-67). The Authors consider a large cohort of 1,400 SLE patients and
identied 274 patients that had one or more neuropsychiatric events. The SF-36, particularly the mental component summary, changed in
the appropriate direction in association with both clinical improvement and worsening.
In conclusion SF-36 should be considered as a reliable outcome of neuropsychiatric events in SLE patients.
Luca Iaccarino

You might also like