Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History of Quantitative Easing
History of Quantitative Easing
History of Quantitative Easing
purchases a set number of bonds and assets from the private financial
institutions on financial markets. This expands the markets. This also
expands the money supply due to increased lending. The rationale
behind the idea is that the expansion of bank lending extends the
markets and money supply and that will improve the economy. The
people then spend the money causing the economy to grow and
everyone including the government will make money. The government
will specifically benefit through tax revenues based on the larger
taxable economy. Also, if the central bank can purchase these assets,
which are riskier than the government bonds, it can lower the interest
yield on them.
QE1, QE2, and QE3
When the American government initiated QE1, QE2, and QE3, the
following steps took place. Before the recession of the 2000s, the
United States Federal Reserve held $700 - $800 billion of Treasury
notes on its balance sheet. The Federal Reserve then bought
mortgage-backed securities, peaking its amount held at $2.1 trillion
dollars in June 2010. The economy started to improve. To maintain the
improvement, the Federal Reserve bought $30 billion in two-to-ten
year Treasury notes every month. This was QE1.
In November 2010, the Federal Reserve announced QE2. It
bought $600 billion of Treasury securities by the end of the second
quarter of 2011.
QE3 was announced on September 13, 2012. The Federal
Reserve bought $40 billion per month in an open-ended bondpurchasing program of agency mortgage-backed securities.
Additionally, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced
that it would likely maintain the federal funds rate near zero through
2015. Because of its open-endedness QE3 had been called QEinfinity. On December 12, 2012, the FOMC announced an increase in
the amount of purchases form $40 billion to $85 billion per month. On
June 19, 2013, the Fed announced bond buying would continue
depending upon the progression of the economy. There was a
subsequent tapering off period for a while and then purchases were
halted on October 29, 2014, after the Federal Reserve had
accumulated a total of $4.5 trillion in assets.
Now, the problem is, the Federal Reserve has too many
premature assets and too high of a debt. Hence, the introduction of
QE4:
QE4
The Problem
QE1, QE2, and QE3 definitely helped boost our American and
World economies; that is an undeniable fact. However, these policies
have created a huge crevasse of debt in the American economy that
can only be filled by QE4. The problem created is that when the
Federal Reserve bought the $4.5 trillion worth of debt, it failed to
materialize the cost of the debt. As time progresses the debt will grow
at an exponential rate as the $4.5 trillion is subject to the rates at
which it is held. Although the Federal Reserve may go further in debt
to pay off the realized market value of the held debt, eventually the
debt will grow far beyond the reach of the rate at which it can be paid
off. This means that the debt held by the Federal Reserve will have to
be paid off by tax revenues through a major tax hike on the people of
the United States, on credit from the federal government. The Federal
Reserve cannot merely sell off its $4.5 trillion in assets for fear of
unduly increasing the money supply leading to a harsh inflationary
period. As well, the increased money supply would also lead to lower
interest rates, but the interest rates now are too low to minimize them.
That was the entire problem leading to QE. Also, as the Federal
Reserve holds the debt, it cannot continue to practice QE3 to incur
substantial amounts of new debt for fear of overwhelming itself and
the economy with too much new debt. In effect, the more debt the
Federal Reserve holds, the slower the economy will operate because
the higher the amount of debt held in the Federal Reserve, the less
room for operation of the government. Soon, if these policies are not
corrected, the Federal Reserve will have no ability to raise interest
rates and no ability to start up and continue QE3. We are not in a crisis
yet because the economy is performing well, but after any type of
minute crash in the economy, the disaster will be prevalent. This is in
addition to the debt held by the federal government.
The Solution
The United States holds two types of debt. The first type of debt
is debt held by the public, such as Treasury securities held by investors
outside the federal government including those held by individuals,
corporations, the Federal Reserve System and foreign, state, and local
governments. The second type of debt is debt held by government
accounts or intragovernmental debt, such as non-marketable Treasury
securities held in accounts administered by the federal government
the set interest rates. So for example Congruent Bank 1 will hold $4.5
trillion in public debt owned by the Federal Reserve only, while the rest
of the national debt will be held in Congruent Banks 2 and 3. The
Federal Reserve will set a lower interest rate on Congruent Bank 1 than
Congruent Banks 2 and 3. This will allow control over inflation as the
new assets sold out of Congruent Bank 1 are sold because the time of
sale can be regulated as the rate of sale increases or decreases and
the entire debt does not have to be subject to the lower rate. In effect,
this idea will allow the Federal Reserve to slowly reduce its $4.5 trillion
share of the debt without going bankrupt in the process because the
entire economy is not subject to the same interest rate.
The debt can also be consolidated if the Federal Reserve does
not want to split its $4.5 trillion off from the rest of the public debt. So
for example the interest rates in the Congruent Banks can be set at
equal to each other, with the banks holding equal amounts of public
and governmental debt. Next, the interest rate in one Congruent Bank
can be raised while the rate in another can be lowered at the same
time and the third will remain the same. This operation will effectively
stop inflation during a raise in interest rates because the interest will
balance as the investments offered will be held at a higher level in one
bank versus another. All the Congruent Banks will offer investments.
Typically, the Congruent Bank with the highest rate will sell the
overwhelming majority of the investments. However, the Bank offering
the lower interest rate will also offer investments. The fact that the
lower rated investments are on the market will drive the market up; as
well, it will decrease inflation and positively affect the money supply.
Then, when the rates are shifted the other way, and those investments
become the high rated investments, the market will subsequently
improve again because the debt is taken from the market after the
debt closes. Further, the interest rates are therefore higher because
the Congruent Bank with the higher interest rate in the beginning was
raised to a level where its low is higher than the first low banks low.
This process is again repeated with the third Congruent Bank to raise
the interest in the third Congruent Bank. This process is called interest
hedging.
On the flip side, reverse interest hedging works as follows. The
three Congruent Banks will hold roughly equal values of the national
debt at equal set interest rates. Next, the debt in Congruent Bank 2
will be transferred out equally or unequally to Congruent Banks 1 and
3, leaving Congruent Bank 2 empty. The rates on interest charged for
investments in Congruent Bank 2 will then be set at a much higher rate
than the rates charged in Congruent Banks 1 and 3. For example,
Congruent Banks 1 and 3 will charge interest rates of 5% while
Congruent Bank 2 will charge 7%. Banks 1 and 3 will then transfer