Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writing Project Assignment
Writing Project Assignment
Spring 2014
Clements
Spring 2014
like the aborted Stop Online Piracy Act or the toothless Anti-Online
Spying Bill. To avoid finding ourselves in the latter quagmire, we must
become more proactive and more innovative; we must try to predict
the ways our choices will affect the future, and take decisive action to
steer humanity in a healthy direction.
Writing Task: For this assignment, you are to create two pieces of
writing: a 5-6 page academic essay, and a shorter piece that defends
the same thesis in a different genre, one that you think is most
conducive to the realization of your own personal voice. The prompt for
both pieces is as follows:
What action do we need to take in response to technology
to facilitate a better future?
25% of your grade will be for the academic essay, and 10% will be for
the companion piece.
Your academic paper must include sources. This time, however, I
will not tell you how many or what kind to use. Instead, use your own
judgment. Use as many sources as you need to make your argument in
as clear and powerful a manner as you can, and choose sources that
are appropriate to the argument you are trying to make. You may need
to use different sources in the two pieces of writing, as they may have
different audiences.
For the shorter piece, you may choose from one of the following
literary genres. If you choose to create a written piece, you should
write approximately 750 words. If you choose a recorded piece, aim for
3-5 minutes. If theres a genre you want to work in that is not on this
list, please run it by me first (Ill probably say yes):
Newspaper Op-Ed
individual
Short film script
Stand-up comedy routine
Short story
YouTube video
play
Practical Tips
Clements
Spring 2014
Decisive action does not always take the form of bans or limitations.
Some action accommodates, rather than restricts, so that new
technologies can develop without impediment. An example of
positive action might be setting up a charity that ensures that all
children have access to laptops, or putting forth a bill that protects
scientists who are researching genetic modification.
Not all action has to go through governmental or other official
channels. You could, for example, persuade your reader that we
need to make changes in our own lives to improve our future, such
as cutting down on our use of mobile phones.
You will probably need to speculate about the future in order to
persuade your reader that your action is essential, but do so with
care; predictions about the future are notoriously unreliable and
rarely convincing. You also run a great risk of writing slippery slope
fallacies.
Make sure your argument is original. Theres no point calling for a
change that has already taken place, or that a substantial number
people are already lobbying for.
Make sure your suggestion could potentially be implemented in the
near future. Theres no point suggesting that we should all create a
clone of ourselves in case we get sick, because the technology is not
there yet.
Dont be afraid of calling for drastic change (banning all cars, for
example), but remember that the more radical the change, the more
convincing your argument has to be.
Make sure you explain exactly how this change should be carried
out. If an opponent could tear down your argument simply by stating
that your suggestion is impossible to implement, youre dead in the
water.
Schedule
Clements
Spring 2014