Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 5
Lecture 5
@ 2 C1
= R1 (C1 , C2 ) + D1
@t
@x2
@C2
@ 2 C2
= R2 (C1 , C2 ) + D2
@t
@x2
where
C 1 , C2
R 1 , R2
D 1 , D2
Pattern formation
@C1
@ 2 C1
= R1 (C1 , C2 ) + D1
@t
@x2
2
@C2
@ C2
= R2 (C1 , C2 ) + D2
@t
@x2
@C1
=0
@t
@ 2 C1
=0
2
@x
@C2
=0
@t
@ 2 C2
=0
2
@x
where,
0
C1 (t, x)
0
C2 (t, x)
= C1 (t, x)
= C2 (t, x)
C1
C2
@R1
@R2
=
, a12 =
@C1
@C1
@R2
@R2
=
, a22 =
@C1
@C2
a11
det
a21
a12
a22
stability implies
=0
2
2
0
a11 C1
0
a12 C2
0
@ C1
D2
@x2
2
@t
2 0
@C10
@
C2
0
0
= a21 C1 + a22 C2 + D2
@t
@x2
a11
a21
0
a12
C1
D1
+
0
a22
C2
0
0
D2
@ C10
2
@x
@ 2 C20
@x2
2
A(q) exp(iqx)
C1
C20
X
q
1
exp(
2
Fourier Series
q t) exp(iqx)
A(q)
Substitute
C1
C20
in
@C10
@t0
@C1
@t
X
q
1
exp(
2
a11
a21
0
a12
C1
D1
+
0
a22
C2
0
= a11 1 + a12 2
D1 q 1
= a21 1 + a22 2
D2 q 2 2
collecting terms
1 (
q t) exp(iqx)
a11 + D1 q ) + 2 ( a12 ) = 0
1 ( a21 ) + 2 (
a22 + D2 q ) = 0
0
D2
@ C10
2
@x
@ 2 C20
@x2
2
if
1 , 2 6= 0
then
1 (
a11 + D1 q 2 ) + 2 ( a12 ) = 0
1 ( a21 ) + 2 (
a22 + D2 q ) = 0
is satisfied only if
det
a11 + D1 q 2
a21
a12
a22 + D2 q 2
i.e.
2
((a11
+ ( a22 + D2 q
D1 q 2 )(a22
a11 + D1 q ) +
D2 q 2 )
a12 a21 ) = 0
=0
trace
2
+ ( a22 + D2 q 2 a11 + D1 q 2 ) +
2
2
((a11 D1 q )(a22 D2 q ) a12 a21 ) = 0
determinant
< 0 implies
a11 + a22
2
(a11
D1 q )(a22
2 2
H(q ) = D1 D2 (q )
Instability implies
2
H(q ) < 0
D1 q
2
D2 q )
always true
D2 q < 0
a12 a21 > 0
2
a12 a21 )
a11
a21
a12
a22
is of the form
or
+
+
+
a12 a21 )
+
+
@C1
@t
@C2
@t
a11
a22
a21
a12
+C1
+C1
C2
C2
v
in
the
form:
shape of the Gli3 -/- mutant. We used an outline of a representative specimen
u
2
and generated a triangular grid with the software Gmesh. The resulting trian=
f
(u,
v)
+
d
u
u
gular grid is shown in Figure S13.
t
v
= g(u, v) + dv 2 v
t
The biological implementation of the reaction kinetics f
For this reason, model
we used the general model developed in [25]
reaction-diusion
linear approximation around the steady state (0, 0). In add
al reaction-diusion
model
madethe
of growth
two reactants
u and
(u3 ) was used
to limit
of the activator.
We obta
form:
Figureu
S13: The triangular limb grid made from
Gli3
-/- v)
shape= f u + f v u3
2 the experimental f
(u,
u
v
= f (u, v) + du u
t
g(u, v) = gu u + gv(1)
v
Wev
mapped the experimental expression pattern
of Hoxa13 into this realistic
2
v)
+
d
domain shape=
by g(u,
using the
Vtk
library
[35].vEventually, we normalized the
v
Any 0reaction-diusion
model of two species can be ap
tpattern between
expression
and 1. This expression pattern was used as an
approximation for Hox genes in the model. In addition, we simulated an Fgf
general
form
by
Taylor
expansion
up
to
the
cubic
term.
Ac
signaling
gradient
by
diusing
a
substance
from
a
region
corresponding
to
the
ementation of the reaction kinetics f and g is unknown.
AER into themodel
mesenchyme.
The patterns ofaHox
expression and Fgf signalinginstability when the follo
produces
diusion-driven
are showed
in Figuremodel
S14.
d the
general
developed in [25] that is obtained by
satisfied:
round the steady state (0, 0). In addition, a cubic term
the growth of the activator.
fu +We
gv obtained
< 0, fu gfv and
fvgguin>the
0
d f + d3 g > 0,
(d f + d g ) 4d(f g f
ally,
ong
no
MBER 2012
VOL 338
SCIENCE
www.sciencemag.org