Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aerodynamics and Aero Elasticity
Aerodynamics and Aero Elasticity
Aerodynamics and Aero Elasticity
2.1.
Introduction
Aero elasticity is the discipline concerned with phenomena wherein the fluid
(air) and structural motions interact significantly. The forces arising due to the
structural motions in the fluid are called self-excited or aero elastic. Classified
distinctly from these are the aerodynamic forces which appear because of the
physical presence of the structure in the fluid (air) and are not dependent on
structural motion.
Any civil engineering structure such as a long-span bridge or a tall building is
viewed aerodynamically as a bluff body as opposed to a streamlined shape such
as that of an airfoil. Bluff-body aero elasticity is quite different from airfoil or thin
plate aero elasticity. For bluff objects of wind engineering applications, it has not
to date been possible to develop expressions for the aerodynamic derivatives
starting from basic fluid flow principles. However, according to Scanlan and
Tomko [ 66 ], for small oscillations, the self-excited forces on a bluff body may be
treated as linear in heave and pitch motions and their first two derivatives, being
possible to measure the aerodynamic coefficients by means of specially designed
wind tunnel tests. Flutter prediction for bridges with bluff cross sections is studied
by Starossek [ 78 ].
The existing bridge state-of-the-art aero elastic response methodology owes its
origin to the studies made earlier on airfoil or thin plate theory. Even today, these
studies are useful regarding the format or type of results to be anticipated. As the
spans of suspension bridges become ultra-long, the bridge cross sections tend to
become more streamlined, and may be expected to resemble in their behavior to
that of the airfoil or thin plate, which further emphasizes the importance of the
latter in the present study.
The determination of the dynamic air forces acting on a flat plate or on an airfoil
which oscillates vertically and torsionally in a steady air stream has been treated
30
by several authors in the past. Expressions for the air forces suitable for the
following investigation were derived by Theodorsen [ 84 ], [ 85 ], [ 86 ], [ 87 ].
Equivalent equations have been developed independently by Kasner & Fingado
[ 26 ] and by Krmn & Sears [ 24 ]. The Theodorsen solution is based on the
assumption that the vibrating flat plate is infinitely thin and the air flow is two
dimensional. Under the latter assumption, the equations apply only to cases
where the object under wind action is sufficiently extended perpendicularly to the
air flow so that the altered conditions at the ends influence the total effect of the
air forces only to a negligible degree. This condition is satisfied to a large extent
in the case of suspension bridges.
The Theodorsen equations were derived for small harmonic oscillations about
the position of equilibrium, composed of simultaneous vertical and torsional
vibrations of constant amplitudes. Consequently, they apply solely to the narrow
zone of transition from stable to unstable motion, which may be considered a
PUC-Rio - Certificao Digital N 0611865/CA
2.2.
Consider a long flat plate having the width B=2b and vibrating vertically and
torsionally about its position of equilibrium, h being the vertical or bending
amplitude of the point C , upward displacements being positive;
is the angle of
rotation, the torsional amplitude, counted positive when the plate rotates
clockwise. The air forces L and M are expressed as functions of the coordinates
h,
and their derivatives with respect to time, see Figure 2-1. Forces L and M
represent the unsteady (or self-excited) aerodynamic lift and moment about the
rotation axis per unit length. At critical wind velocity vc the two components of the
coupled motion have the same frequency, but show a difference of their phase
angles.
The force components in the vertical direction and around the longitudinal axis
are represented by the air force vector FL defined by two components:
FL =
L
=
M
L1 + L2 + L3
b
M1 + 2 (L1
L3
(2.1)
31
Figure 2-1 Force components experimented by a flat plate under wind flow.
in which
L1 = 2
bC k U U +h+2
M1 =
b2 h ; L3 =
; L2 =
8
b2 U
(2.2a)
b4
(2.2b)
L
=
M
b2 U + h + 2
2
b bU
2+b
Ub C k (U + h + b
8 +
2)
Ub C k (U + h + b
2)
(2.3)
(2.4)
F(k) and G(k) are composed by Bessel functions of the first and second kind,
J0 k , J1 (k), Y0 (k), Y1 (k), respectively, i =
1,
oscillation of the airfoil, U is the mean wind velocity, b is the half-chord length of
32
is the air density (1.225 kg/m3 in SI units
+c h +k
(2.7)
= M
(2.8)
where
Various forms for the linear expressions for L and M have been employed. The
classic theoretical (and some experimental) work has used complex number
forms based on the representation of the flutter oscillation as having the complex
form
In the United States, real forms have been preferred, as stated by Scanlan [ 67 ].
A new representation convention is also suggested by Zasso [ 104 ]. The real
and complex number forms will be presented next.
Considering solutions of the type ei t , equations (2.7) and (2.8) read:
h = h 0 ei
=
ei(
(2.9)
t+ )
(2.10)
The following expressions are derived from equations (2.9) and (2.10):
h = i h ; ih =
=i
h; h
= ih
(2.11)
=i
(2.12)
; i =
h=
(2.13)
33
2
(2.14)
Substituting equations (2.13) and (2.14) in (2.3) and (2.4), one obtains:
L
=
M
b2 U
2
b bU
h +2
2
Ub (F k + iG(k) U + h + b
2
8 +
Ub
F k + iG k
U +h+b
2
(2.15)
2.3.
; i is substituted by
; ih is substituted by
h and i
L
=
M
2
h + 2 Ub F k U + h + b 2
b2 U
+2 Ub G k U
h b
2
2 2
2
2
8 + Ub F k U + h + b
b bU 2 b
2
+ Ub G k U
h b
2
(2.16)
The right-hand terms of equations (2.16) corresponding to L and M are all real
numbers.
The terms in h in the upper part of (2.16) read:
2
Ub F k h = 2
U2
2b F
2
k h U = U 2 2b (2k 4) (2 F k k) h U =
= U 2 (B K 4) (2 F k k) h U = U 2 B [K H1 (k) h U]
where
H1 k = 2 F(k) k
The terms in
(2.17)
+2
Ub F k b
2+2
= U 2 2b (2k 8) [1 + 2G k k + F(k)] B
Ub G k U
U = U 2 B K H2 (k) B
where
H2 k = (
The terms in
8k) [1 + 2G k k + F(k)]
1 2 U 2 2b k 2 8 [F k
kG(k) 2](2
8k 2 ) = U 2 2b K 2 H3 k
(2.18)
34
where
H3 k = (2
8k 2 )[F k
kG(k) 2]
(2.19)
h +2
Ub G k
1 2 U 2 2b (K 2 4)[1 2 + G k k] 2 (h b)] = U 2 2b K 2 H4 k (h b)
where
H4 k =
2 [1 8 + G k 4k]
(2.20)
The upper part of (2.16) can be written with real numbers as:
+ K 2 H4 k h B
U + K 2 H3 k
L = U 2 B KH1 k h U + KH2 k B
(2.21a)
M = U 2 B 2 KA1 k h U + KA2 k B
U + K 2 A3 k
+ K 2 A4 k h B
(2.21b)
where
A1 k = F(k) 8k
(2.22)
k [F k
1 + 2G k k]
(2.23)
kG k 2 + k 2 8]
(2.24)
A2 k = (
A3 k = (
16k 2 )[F k
A4 k =
G(k) 8k
(2.25)
The real terms Hi=1,3 and Ai=1,3 were introduced by Scanlan & Tomko [ 66 ] ,
who neglected terms in h and intentionally omitted air inertial terms in h and .
Terms with coefficients H4 and A4 are added herein for completeness. All these
formulae can be found in Scanlan et al. in [ 62 ], where L and M are expressed as
functions of k instead of K and b, instead of B. In this case, the full expressions
#
and A#i=1,4 are (as shown in [ 62 ]):
for L, M, Hi=1,4
1
L = 2 U 2 2b kH1 # k h U + kH2 # k b
1
U + k 2 H3 # k
+ k 2 H4 # k h B
U + k 2 A3 # k
+ k 2 A4 # k h b
where
H1 # k = 2 F(k) k
H2 # k = (
H3 # k = (2
A1 # k = F(k) k
k) [1 + 2G k k + F(k)] ; A2 # k = (
k 2 )[F k
kG k 2] ; A3 # k = (
k [F k
k 2 ) [F k
1 + 2G k k]
kG k 2 + k 2 8]
35
H4 # k =
A4 # k =
2 [1 2 + G k k]
G(k) k
Expressions Hi=1,4 [(2.17) to (2.20)] and Ai=1,4 [(2.22) to (2.25)] versus k are
shown in Table 2-1:
K
H*1=
2 F/4k
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.5708E+05
13.0678
5.7144
3.4818
2.4543
1.8785
1.5153
1.2673
1.0881
0.9528
0.8473
H*2=
(1+F+2G/k)/8k
H*3=
2 (F-kG/2)/8k2
H*4=
=-0.25* *(1+2*G/k)
A*1=
F/8k
A*2=
K3- (1-F-2G/k)/32k
-8.3476E+05
-6.3386
-0.3115
0.6146
0.7855
0.7815
0.7327
0.6752
0.6199
0.5700
0.5258
7.8539E+09
66.0158
14.6564
6.0377
3.2298
1.9968
1.3529
0.9761
0.7372
0.5764
0.4630
17.4806
1.9211
0.6961
0.1535
-0.1375
-0.3119
-0.4247
-0.5017
-0.5566
-0.5972
-0.6279
3.9269E+04
3.2670
1.4286
0.8704
0.6136
0.4696
0.3788
0.3168
0.2720
0.2382
0.2118
-2.2833E+05
-3.5482
-1.0596
-0.5009
-0.2945
-0.1973
-0.1441
-0.1117
-0.0905
-0.0757
-0.0649
A*3=
(F-kG/2+k^2/8)/16k2
1.9635E+09
16.5285
3.6886
1.5340
0.8320
0.5238
0.3628
0.2686
0.2089
0.1686
0.1403
A*4=
=-0.125* *G/k
4.5665E+00
0.6766
0.3704
0.2347
0.1620
0.1184
0.0902
0.0709
0.0572
0.0471
0.0394
Table 2-1 - Aerodynamic derivatives Hi=1,4 and Ai=1,4 , considering the aerodynamic mass
2.4.
According to Klppel & Thiele [ 28 ] and following Starossek [ 80 ], the air force
vector
is given by:
L
chh
1
L
= 2 U2 2 k2
bc h
M
bch
b2 c
(2.26)
The air force coefficients, or aerodynamic derivatives, are complex and are
given by:
chh k = 1
c
(2i k) C k ; ch k = ( 1 k) [i C k + 1 + (2 k)C(k)]
k = (i k) C k
;c
k = (1 2k) C k
1 + (1 k 2 )C k + 1 8
(2.27), (2.28); (2.29), (2.30)
(2F k)i = (4
=
c
(H4 + H1 i)
(2.31)
(1 k) [i C + 1 + 2 k C] =
kG 2)]
= (8
(2i k) F + iG =
(2 k ( 1 + F) 2 + G k i =
)(H3 + H2 i)
(2.32)
k = (1 k) C = (1 k) (F + iG) =
G k + F k i = (8
k = (1 2k) C
) (A4 + A1 i)
1 + 1 k2 C + 1 8 =
(2.33)
36
= [ 1 k2 ) F
kG 2 + 1 8 + (1 k ( F
= (16
1) 2 + G k) i =
)(A3 + A2 i)
(2.34)
Now, if the cij and cij derivatives are available, it is possible to calculate
Scanlan derivatives Hi=1,4 and Ai=1,4 as multiples of cij and cij . The derivatives
cij and cij for a flat plate were taken from Thiesemann [ 88 ]. Hi=1,4 and Ai=1,4
were obtained as multiples of cij and cij , compare Table 2-2 and Table 2-3.
Theodorsen (cij according to Thiesemann, op. cit. , page 266)
k
c'hh
c''hh
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
-2.4460
-0.8862
-0.1955
0.1751
0.3972
0.5407
0.6338
0.7087
0.7603
0.7995
-16.6400
-7.2760
-4.4330
-3.1250
-2.3920
-1.9290
-1.6140
-1.3850
-1.2130
-1.0790
c'
H*4
= - /4 .c'hh
H*1
= - /4 .c''hh
1.9211
0.6960
0.1535
-0.1375
-0.3120
-0.4247
-0.4978
-0.5566
-0.5971
-0.6279
13.0690
5.7146
3.4817
2.4544
1.8787
1.5150
1.2676
1.0878
0.9527
0.8474
c''
1.7230
0.9430
0.5977
0.4125
0.3014
0.2296
0.1806
0.1456
0.1198
0.1003
8.3190
3.6380
2.2170
1.5620
1.1960
0.9647
0.8068
0.6927
0.6066
0.5394
c'h
c''h
-168.1000
-37.3200
-15.3700
-8.2250
-5.0850
-3.4450
-2.4860
-1.8770
-1.4680
-1.1790
16.1400
0.7933
-1.5650
-2.0000
-1.9900
-1.8660
-1.7190
-1.5790
-1.4510
-1.3390
84.1800
18.7900
7.8120
4.2370
2.6670
1.8480
1.3680
1.0640
0.8589
0.7146
c'
-18.0700
-5.3970
-2.5510
-1.5000
-1.0050
-0.7337
-0.5689
-0.4607
-0.3854
-0.3306
c''
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
A*4
= /8 .c'
0.6766
0.3703
0.2347
0.1620
0.1184
0.0902
0.0709
0.0572
0.0470
0.0394
A*1
= /8 .c''h
H*3
= - /8 .c'h
H*2
= - /8 .c''h
A*3
= /16.c'
A*2
= /16 . c''
3.2669
1.4286
0.8706
0.6134
0.4697
0.3788
0.3168
0.2720
0.2382
0.2118
66.0127
14.6555
6.0358
3.2299
1.9969
1.3528
0.9762
0.7371
0.5765
0.4630
-6.3382
-0.3115
0.6146
0.7854
0.7815
0.7328
0.6750
0.6201
0.5698
0.5258
16.5287
3.6894
1.5339
0.8319
0.5237
0.3629
0.2686
0.2089
0.1686
0.1403
-3.5480
-1.0597
-0.5009
-0.2945
-0.1973
-0.1441
-0.1117
-0.0905
-0.0757
-0.0649
Table 2-2 Theodorsen derivatives cij , cij and Hij , Aij obtained as - multiples of cij .
2.5.
2 [1 8 + G k 4k]
kG k 2 + k 2 8] (
(2.35a)
16k 2 )
(2.35b)
k =
k = [F k
2 [ G k 4k]
kG k 2](
(2.36a)
16k 2 )
(2.36b)
The aerodynamic derivatives of a flat plate neglecting the inertia effect of the
aerodynamic mass are displayed in Table 2-3, for 0.05 k 0.5.
37
H*1
K
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
H*2
H*3
H**4
= (1+F+2G/k)/
==2 F/4k
=2 (F-kG/2)/8k2
8k
0.25* *(0+2*G/k)
0.05 28.5574
0.1 13.0678
0.15 8.0927
0.2 5.7144
0.25 4.3514
0.3 3.4818
0.35 2.8853
0.4 2.4543
0.45 2.1301
0.5 1.8785
-26.0498
-6.3386
-1.8674
-0.3115
0.3308
0.6146
0.7386
0.7855
0.7935
0.7815
286.5997
66.0158
27.4638
14.6564
8.9939
6.0377
4.3152
3.2298
2.5044
1.9968
4.1043
2.7065
1.9526
1.4815
1.1639
0.9389
0.7733
0.6479
0.5505
0.4735
A*1
A*2
= F/8k
=- (1-F2G/k)/32k
7.1393
3.2670
2.0232
1.4286
1.0879
0.8704
0.7213
0.6136
0.5325
0.4696
-10.4394
-3.5482
-1.7758
-1.0596
-0.7027
-0.5009
-0.3764
-0.2945
-0.2380
-0.1973
A**3
A*4
= (F=-0.125* *G/k
kG/2+k^2/8)/16k2
71.6499
16.5039
6.8659
3.6641
2.2485
1.5094
1.0788
0.8075
0.6261
0.4992
1.0261
0.6766
0.4881
0.3704
0.2910
0.2347
0.1933
0.1620
0.1376
0.1184
Table 2-3 - Aerodynamic derivatives of a flat plate, neglecting the aerodynamic mass.
2.6.
2.7.
Methods of extraction
38
[ 68 ] and Bergmann [ 4 ]. The literature about derivative extraction is very
extense and can be looked for in the cited doctoral theses or for example in
Singh [ 73 ] or Zasso et al. [ 105 ]. Inter-relations among flutter derivatives is
presented by Scanlan et al. [ 65 ]. Reports by Starossek [ 81 ] and Starossek et
al. [ 75 ] on flutter derivatives obtained in the hydraulic channel of the University
of Hamburg are employed in the present work because they are best fit to our
present purposes.
2.8.
Thiesemann results
Profile group
Trapeze-like sections
Trapeze-like sections
with guide vanes
Rectangular profiles
Other profiles
Profile
GB
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
M
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
S
L1
L2
L3
R4
R4
R16
R20v
P
R200
TC
T2
C
C2
C3
G
Page
Page 193
Page 195
Page 197
Page 199
Page 201
Page 203
Page 205
Page 207
Page 209
Page 211
Page 213
Page 215
Page 217
Page 219
Page 221
Page 223
Page 225
Page 227
Page 229
Page 231
Page 233
Page 235
Page 237
Page 239
Page 241
Page 243
Page 245
Page 247
Page 249
Page 251
Page 253
Description, reference
Great Belt Bridge [36, 38]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Great Belt Bridge [36]
Trapeze cross section
Millau Bridge
Tsurumi Bridge
Tsing-Ma Bridge
Normandie Bridge
Tatara Bridge
Mexico
Plate-like Profile
Severn Bridge
Humber Bridge
Jiangyin Bridge
Messina Bridge
Rectangle B:H=4:1
Rectangle B:H=8:1
Rectangle B:H=16:1
Rectangle with a vertical diafragm
Rectangle B:H=25:1
Rectangle B:H=200:1
Tacoma Bridge
Tacoma H:B=1:10
Chongqing Bridge
Chongqing variant
Chongqing without wings
Gibraltar Bridge [35],[37]
39
2.9.
Buffeting forces
The quasi-steady buffeting forces (exclusive of the steady part) due to wind
turbulence are, according to Scanlan & Jones [ 63 ]:
Lb =
1
2
U 2 B[CL (2u U) + CL + CD (w U)
(2.37)
Mb = 2 U 2 B 2 [CM (2u U) + CM (w U)
(2.38)
where CL and CM are the mean lift and moment coefficients (referred to deck
width B) of a typical deck section; CL = dCL d and CM = dCM d and u = u t ,
w = w t are wind horizontal and vertical gust components, respectively. These
gust forces neglect self-induced buffeting effects. Primes denote first derivatives
with respect to the angle of attack
CM = dCM d for
at
2.10.
The linear dynamic system of the bridge deck subjected to self-excited and
buffeting wind forces is approximated by the following two degrees of freedom
equation:
mh + ch h + k h h =
U 2 B [ K H1 k
K 2 H4 k
h
]
B
1
2
h
U
+ K H2 k B U + K 2 H3 k
U 2 B [CL
I
U 2 B 2 [ K A1 k
h
U
+ c
2u
U
+ CL + CD
w
]
U
(2.39)
+k h=
+ K A2 k B U + K 2 A3 k
+ K 2 A4 k
h
B
+ 2 U2 B2 ]
(2.40)
Neglecting for the moment the buffeting forces and transforming (2.39) and
(2.40) into the Laplace domain with zero initial conditions gives:
[m s 2 + ch s + k h ] L ( h) =
2K 2 H3 k
1
2
( ) + 2K 2 H4 k
U 2 B [ s 2K H1 k
h
B
h
U
+ s 2 K H2 k B
L
U
(2.41)
40
[I s 2 + c s + k ] L ( ) =
2K 2 A3 k
1
2
U 2 B 2 [ s 2K A1 k
( ) + 2K 2 A4 k
+ s 2 K A2 k B
(2.42)
B
U
gives:
U2
mB p2 B 2 + ch B p
2 K H2 k p L
I p2
U2
B2
U
B
+ 2K 2 H3 k
+ c p
U
B
h
B
+ kh B
1
2
2 K A2 k p L ( ) + 2K 2 A3 k
h
B
h
B
(2.43)
h
B
U 2 B 2 [ 2K A1 k p L ( ) +
( )+
h
B
2K 2 A4 k
U 2 B [ 2K H1 k p
+ 2K 2 H4 k
+k
1
2
( )]
(2.44)
ch B 0
p
0 c
0 2 U2
p B2 +
I
Q
= 11
Q13
U
B
Q12
Q14
kh
0
0
k
( B)
( )
L ( Bh )
L( )
(2.45)
p2 B 2 +
U
B
= [ f]
U2 L ( )
(2.46)
mB
0
=
0
I
=[
h/B
1/2 B
0
=
0
]
1/2 B 2
ch B 0
0 c
2K 2 H4 + p 2KH1
2K 2 A4 + p 2KA1
(2.47)
(2.48)
kh
0
2K 2 H3 + p 2KH2
2K 2 A3 + p 2KA2
0
k
(2.49)
(2.50)
Theodorsen functions are determined only for purely imaginary terms of the
dimensionless Laplace variable p = iK. Thus, the approximation is performed for
41
oscillatory motion only. The unsteady aerodynamics are described by (2.50) for
p = iK. Hence,
=
2K 2 H4 + 2K 2 H1 i 2K 2 H3 + 2K 2 H2 i
2K 2 A4 + 2K 2 A1 i 2K 2 A3 + 2K 2 A2 i
(2.51)
Note that H4 and A3 neglect the inertia effects of the aerodynamic mass.
2.11.
In order to obtain solutions on the Laplace domain for both growing and
decaying motion it is necessary to express the forces as functions of p in the
entire non-dimensionalized complex p-plane. The concept of analytic continuation
is often used, by extending these functions to the entire complex plane. Analytic
functions agreeing with the aerodynamic forcing function at all values of
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
Q11r
Q11i
Q12r
Q12i
Q21r
Q21i
Q22r
Q22i
=2*K2*H4** =2*K2*H1** =2*K2*H3** =2*K2*H2** =2*K2*A4** =2*K2*A1** =2*K2*A3** =2*K2*A2**
0.0821
0.2165
0.3515
0.4741
0.5820
0.6760
0.7579
0.8293
0.8919
0.9469
0.5711
1.0454
1.4567
1.8286
2.1757
2.5069
2.8276
3.1415
3.4507
3.7569
5.7320
5.2813
4.9435
4.6900
4.4969
4.3471
4.2289
4.1342
4.0571
3.9937
-0.5210
-0.5071
-0.3361
-0.0997
0.1654
0.4425
0.7238
1.0054
1.2854
1.5631
0.0205
0.0541
0.0879
0.1185
0.1455
0.1690
0.1895
0.2073
0.2230
0.2367
0.1428
0.2614
0.3642
0.4572
0.5439
0.6267
0.7069
0.7854
0.8627
0.9392
1.4330
1.3203
1.2359
1.1725
1.1242
1.0868
1.0572
1.0335
1.0143
0.9984
Table 2-5- Unsteady aerodynamic data for a flat plate, 0.05 k 0.5
-0.2088
-0.2839
-0.3197
-0.3391
-0.3514
-0.3606
-0.3688
-0.3770
-0.3855
-0.3946
42
Q11i x Q11r
4
Q11i=2K^2*H1
0
0
0.25
Q11r=2K^2*H4
0.5
0.75
Q12i x Q12r
2
1.6
Q12i=
2K^2*H2
1.2
0.8
0.4
-0.4
-0.8
3.6
4.2
Q12r=2K^2*H3
4.8
5.4
0.225
0.3
Q21i x Q21r
1
Q21i=
2K^2*A11
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.075
Q21r=2K^2*A4 0.15
Q22i x Q22r
-0.15
-0.2
Q22i=
2K^2*A21
-0.25
-0.3
-0.35
-0.4
0.8
Q22r=2K^2*A3
1.2
1.4
1.6