Some meteorites are more valuable than gold and thats a shame, laments O. Richard Norton.
s anyone who reads the newspaper or browses
the Internet must know by now, meteorites are hot. Im not referring to what happens to them during atmospheric passage. Im talking about prices. What used to be a small hobby served by a few dealers with very limited supplies has mushroomed into a worldwide feeding frenzy. Recent, well-publicized auctions of Mars rocks have attracted people not previously interested in the subject. Today there are a growing number of collectors, along with more dealers to provide ever rarer specimens at ever higher prices an inflationary spiral not seen elsewhere in the economy. Some seek only investment and expect a good return. Others, genuinely hooked on the thrill of being able to own a rock from space, want to share their excitement and knowledge with others. Increased demand is good for business, of course, but there is a downside too. With some private holdings surpassing those in many museums, collectors now present formidable competition to research institutions. The rarest meteorite types, coveted by scientists and collectors alike, have the dubious honor of being some of the most expensive commodities per gram in the world. This is cause for concern among researchers and raises issues of government regulation affecting private ownership of meteoritic material. In some countries, like Canada and Australia, laws prohibit the export of meteorites. In others, any found meteorites automatically belong to the government, or it may be illegal even to collect them. But such laws have never really worked, and a steady supply of meteorites flows into the United States from abroad, sometimes under dubious circumstances. The suppliers are labeled meteorite poachers, and the collectors who acquire the specimens themselves risk becoming accessories. Yet this does little to curb the demand. Some researchers fear that significant privately owned specimens will be lost to science forever. This is not unjustified. Skyrocketing prices have driven many researchers and smaller collectors (like me) out of the market, even as specimens needed for study are disappearing into private vaults. For the present, at least, most dealers do share important new finds with scientists, allowing for documentation and some study. And many private collections eventually wind up in research institutions or museums, though sometimes going to the highest bidder. More often, these caches are sold to dealers, who in
10
October 1997 Sky & Telescope
turn make them available to the public and scientists.
Another fear is that private collections will not be properly curated. Simply losing a meteorites label could mean the loss of a valuable specimen. Further, many samples are inherently unstable in the presence of oxygen and thus deteriorate at an alarming rate if special precautions are not taken. Its not necessarily true, however, that meteorites are best curated by institutions. I have personally examined some collections that are in terrible disarray, but I have yet to see a private collection showing serious neglect. Private owners generally possess a passion for meteorites that is not evident among a museums staff. Ultimately, it doesnt matter whether collections are private or institutional. What matters most, I believe, is preservation. Left in the ground, meteorites ultimately become worthless hunks of weathered rock. It is thus ironic that the most famous strewnfield in the world, surrounding Meteor Crater in Arizona, is off limits to collecting. This is the policy of Meteor Crater Enterprises (MCE), the agency responsible for operations there. A forest of signs warns visitors that meteorite hunting is illegal (though theres no specific state law against it) and threatens prosecution. Arrests have been made over the years. Meanwhile, the Caon Diablo meteorites, as theyre officially known, continue to rust away. Instead of allowing these irons to deteriorate, MCE should allow controlled commercial colJON CONRAD lecting for a fee (or a percentage of the take), thus preserving the Caon Diablo meteorites and making them available for distribution. The collectors should be required to document their finds, thus adding to important field data. Meteorites accumulated by MCE could then be distributed to educational institutions. Throughout history people have collected just about everything. No laws will ever change that. Collectors far outnumber researchers, and amateurs are responsible for most new meteorite finds (Antarctica excepted). Laws prohibiting ownership will bring this trend to a standstill a greater loss to science. The scientific community must look at the positive side of meteorite mania and take advantage of it. Collectors, private and commercial, are preserving specimens for the future, and these collections will ultimately be returned to the meteorite pool for the benefit of all. The former director of Flandrau Planetarium in Tucson, Arizona, O. Richard Norton is working on a second edition of his popular book Rocks from Space. Focal Point invites contributions from readers who wish to comment on contemporary issues in astronomy and space science.