Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015 Winfred Cannon (District 3)
2015 Winfred Cannon (District 3)
Council District: 3
Council District: 3
society that to allow a group to express itself does not mean indoctrination, but it is simply an
opportunity to be recognized as a member of the greater community making significant
contributions culturally and economically. We then can create an environment where all persons
can pursue happiness. It cannot be ignored that members of LGBT communities are bold enough to
go into areas where others refuse to go. Gentrification has resulted because many in the LGBT
community have been pioneers in the revitalization process of many of our cities. Lets embrace this
for Dallas and acknowledge that many in the LGBT community have contributed to the revitalization
of many urban cores such as San Francisco, Philadelphia, and New York. These cities have succeeded
since they included the LGBT community into the fabric of their cities. Since Dallas has the 6th
largest LGBT population in the U.S I believe that this inclusion will be a win-win for all those
involved.
Would you recruit and consider qualified LGBT constituents for your commission and board
appointments?
As a city council member, I want the most competent and effective people serving our city on the
various boards and commissions. I would look to the persons credentials and experience as the
criteria for selection while balancing this against a mandate for diversity. I believe that competency
and diversity can be accomplished without sacrificing the While I value diversity in city government,
as I am a minority, my priority in making these appointments would be to select candidates who are
qualified in their own right to serve, not make appointments to satisfy a race or minority quota.
Will you support the Dallas City Councils resolution for marriage equality and also a statewide ban
on LGBT employment discrimination?
In March of 2014, the Dallas City Council approved a resolution supporting lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender city employees. I will continue to support this resolution if elected to ensure that
our LGBT employees have the same access to benefits as any other employee. As for a statewide
ban on employment discrimination, I personally believe that the era of discrimination against all
people including women and LGBT employees is past due. There should be equality across the
board. Although the Dallas City Council cant enact state legislation, I believe that as all of Texas
major cities pass similar resolutions supporting LGBT employees, the voice will be given to the
statewide equality battle. It is duly noted that on or about February 18, 2015 that Dallas supported a
measure for LGBT spouses to obtain marriage benefits.
Would you actively lobby and take action to encourage Mayor Rawlings to join the Mayors for the
Freedom to Marry?
Same sex marriage is now legal in 37 states, leaving Texas and 12 other states in a diminishing
minority. I believe that Mayor Rawlings must be whole hearted about joining this organization and
stand behind its principles. I would not actively lobby the Mr. Rawlings to join this or any other
organization that he does not feel personally convicted to join. Although the freedom to marry is a
salient issue, I do understand that this issue will ultimately be decided by the State legislature and
the US Supreme Court. What can be legitimately enacted at the local level I will support recognizing
that inclusion can be accomplished on other levels.
Council District: 3
The private sector has seen a large increase in policies and benefits for LGBT employees. How should
the City of Dallas remain competitive to attract and retain top LGBT talent?
Dallas should match those policies and benefits. If Dallas city government is going to run like a
highly functioning business operation, the benefits provided should match those as the companies
that this city attracts.
Do you support comprehensive transgender inclusive health benefits and as a council member work
with the City Manager to implement such benefits?
This is a matter of contract law. However within the framework of the law I would support such a
measure.
3. Current Events
The Governor and several state legislators intend to push legislation through to curtail the current
scope of governance of home rule cities like Dallas. This could remove local control over matters
such as drilling within city limits, LGBT protections, etc. Do you favor or oppose this, and what would
you plan to do in response?
I strongly oppose the thought of this bill. Texas has made it clear that they dont want the Federal
government interfering in state rights issues. As a municipality, it would be a violation of our rights
to have crucial decisions made from Austin that effect the people of Dallas. In response, strong
lobbying efforts would need to be made by a majority of our state representatives from Dallas. I
would build that alliance between city council and our state legislators to protect the governing
interest of Dallas.
What are your thoughts on current campaign finance rules for Dallas elections which set donation
amount limits on people newly seeking office but essentially place no donation amount limits on
incumbents via unrestricted officeholder accounts which may be used for campaign purposes?
There should be an even playing field among incumbents and candidates. The unfair advantage that
incumbents have makes it harder to remove an ineffective councilmember. If the elected
councilmember if fiscally responsible, they will be able to make do with spending all raised fund and
not need the excess funds provided by an Officeholder account.
The proposed Trinity Parkway toll road continues to make headlines. Do you see the Trinity Parkway
as an essential roadway project to alleviate projected road congestion around our downtown core,
or are there other solutions that Dallas should be focused on?
The Trinity Parkway has ballooned into a massive highway proposal in one of the few natural
resources this city has. Cities across America have expanded and/or built new highways to alleviate
congestion only to end up with more congestion on these new lanes. The answer to easing highway
congestion is not to build more lanes but to focus the population in a denser area where people
would not have to use highways to travel from work, home, school, and recreation. Our solution to
congestion is to make our downtown core and the neighborhoods adjacent to it livable for ALL
people of all income levels. We need to focus the money on building new housing and the amenities
that residents need to make urban living comfortable and competitive to suburban life (More parks,
better public transit, grocery stores, improved schools, etc)