This document summarizes a speech given to the New York Police Department in 1965. The speech argues that society has become more concerned with protecting the rights of criminals than victims. It notes that when a criminal is apprehended, forces in society resent and suspect the police instead of recognizing their work. The speech urges supporting the rights of law-abiding citizens to feel safe and protected under the law.
The Colored Waiting Room: Empowering the Original and the New Civil Rights Movements; Conversations Between an MLK Jr. Confidant and a Modern-Day Activist
This document summarizes a speech given to the New York Police Department in 1965. The speech argues that society has become more concerned with protecting the rights of criminals than victims. It notes that when a criminal is apprehended, forces in society resent and suspect the police instead of recognizing their work. The speech urges supporting the rights of law-abiding citizens to feel safe and protected under the law.
This document summarizes a speech given to the New York Police Department in 1965. The speech argues that society has become more concerned with protecting the rights of criminals than victims. It notes that when a criminal is apprehended, forces in society resent and suspect the police instead of recognizing their work. The speech urges supporting the rights of law-abiding citizens to feel safe and protected under the law.
This document summarizes a speech given to the New York Police Department in 1965. The speech argues that society has become more concerned with protecting the rights of criminals than victims. It notes that when a criminal is apprehended, forces in society resent and suspect the police instead of recognizing their work. The speech urges supporting the rights of law-abiding citizens to feel safe and protected under the law.
Remarks To the New York Police Department Holy Name Societ y
April 4, 1965-Wm. F. Buckley Jr.
In appearing before you today, in th e general atmosphere of hostility to wards the police force, I feel a littl e like the man in Madrid a few years ago who was asked at a sidewalk cafe , "What do you think of Franco? " "Come with me," he spoke mysteriously . The questioner got up and followed his quarry, who led him silen t through the streets, past the park, t o the shore of a lake . Wordlessly h e drew up a rowboat, beckoned the ma n in and rowed silently to the middl e of the lake, looked suspiciously abou t him, and whispered : " I like him . " (laughter ) We liveas all men have ever live d in two worlds . Roughly speaking , it is the world that makes the news papers, and the world that doesn't. The world of the unusual and th e world of the usual. In the journalisti c world they define a news story a s man bites dog, that is . the revers e of what is normal . In the plain and ordinary world, dogs bite men . In the newsworthy world, the man bites th e dog. A world structured on commo n senserecognizes the difference between the two acts, ignores the one as commonplace, remarks the othe r as an occasion worth commenting on . Something special is happening in ou r world that blurs the old distinction s between the commonplace and th e unusual . We are departing from rea-
lism so much as to make one wonde r
whether we are not entering an ag e of surrealism. An age when it is considered far more remarkable that a dog should bite a man than vice versa . An age, here in New York, where i t is considered far less extraordinary that a criminal should break a law , than that a criminal should be apprehended for doing so . (laughter ) The moment a criminal is apprehended, the noisiest forces of moder n society seem to go into a co-ordinate d act of resentment and suspicion . The doctrine that a man is innocent unti l proved guilty seems to have been stretched to mean that the apprehending officials are guilty unles s proved innocent. (laughter) The members of the community who control the newsand I speak here, no t only of the news that makes th e newspapers, but of the news that get s into the thought, and forms the opinion, of the intellectuals, those whos e reactions dominate the thought of societythe members of the communit y who control the news in this broade r sense seem to be, in respect of crim e and punishment, infinitely more concerned to do away with the latter , than with the former. (laughter) They justify that concern on any number of grounds : all of them , needless to say, of impeccable moral breeding . (laughter) They care greatl y that injustice be not committed. They
care greatly that brutality be avoided .
They care infinitely that a man' s right to dissent be not curtailed . I care to o about these things . So do you . But I care as a citizen, and you care as those who devote your lives to guarding the rights of citizens, for the corresponding rights of the party of th e first part ; the party of the first par t being, in a civilized society, thos e who abide by the law, and succeed , without external pressure, in disciplining their lawless impulses sufficiently to respect the rights of others . Those men and women who are killed , mauled, and molested on our street s are, unlike those who are arraigned and charged with having committed the offenses, victims of injustice beyond a reasonable doubt . The man on whom brutality has been inflicted , in a subway car, in a silent street , in the darkness of the park, is a man condemned to brutality beyond th e powers of any of us to set right. Th e republic whose vital secrets are stolen by the dissenter, or whose good fait h is broken by him, is weaker on tha t account beyond the capacity of an y judge or jury to redress . . Here is where one sees, with a n alarm that borders on panic, how the concern of the most outspoken members of our society, the concern ove r the privileges of the suspected male factor rather than over the violated privileges of the law-abiding citizen,
The Colored Waiting Room: Empowering the Original and the New Civil Rights Movements; Conversations Between an MLK Jr. Confidant and a Modern-Day Activist