Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Time Varying Risk GARCH Models-Part1
Time Varying Risk GARCH Models-Part1
Time Varying Risk GARCH Models-Part1
8
Time-varying Risk and
leverage effects: GARCH Models
finance
GARCH models
ARCH/GARCH models are popular in empirical studies of
finance
; ARCH: Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity
Conditional variance is auto-correlated with lagged cond. Var. and lagged squared errors
finance
finance
l ep tok u rtic
F a t tails
finance
Large changes
followed by large ones
Small changes
followed by small ones
finance
(8.2.1)
ut = e t h t
(8.2.2)
i =1
i =1
h t = + i u 2t i + i h t i
xt : independent variable(s)
ut : residuals of "mean" equation
ht: conditional variance
; Eq. (8.2.1) is called "mean equation."
; Eq. (8.2.3) is called "variance equation."
finance
(8.2.3)
Normalized Residuals
(8.2.4)
finance
Variance equation
h t = + i u
i =1
2
t i
+ i h t i
i =1
finance
(8.2.3)
(8.2.5)
ARCH(q) models
Eq (8.2.3) with lagged order, p = 0, i.e., GARCH(0,q) models
become ARCH(q) models
finance
(8.2.2)
finance
(8.2.6)
10
GARCH models
GARCH models' key is on the variance equation.
h t = + 1 u 2t 1 + 1 h t 1
finance
11
(8.2.7)
2 = + 1 2 + 1 2 .
(8.2.8)
1 ( 1 + 1 ) .
(8.2.9)
finance
12
8.3
r_bac
r_cola
r_disney
r_fedex
r_ibm
Mean
0.1518
-0.1098
-0.0016
0.0205
0.0137
0.0237
Median
0.1797
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.0145
0.0126
min
-68.498
-69.169
-20.430
-10.231
-15.646
-8.662
Max
13.0190
30.2100
18.0650
14.8180
8.7678
10.8990
Std. Dev.
3.1853
4.5121
1.9987
1.9441
2.0689
1.4618
C.V.
20.9780
41.0800
1222.2000
94.9060
151.3900
61.7350
Skewness
-6.6501
-2.5387
-1.3891
0.6422
-0.2541
0.0689
kurtosis
143.41
49.05
25.60
8.90
5.18
6.07
finance
Fedex, IBM.
13
finance
14
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Mean
0.45687
0.013694
0.067384
0.12511
-0.13848
0.44947
Median
0.2923
0.2827
-0.15758
0.21093
0.031558
0.25435
Minimum
-6.5932
-68.498
-6.542
-11.257
-19.747
-4.4068
Maximum
12.361
8.7248
11.181
10.017
13.019
6.5405
Std. Dev.
2.5629
4.897
2.3825
2.5799
3.6156
1.8618
C.V.
5.6097
357.6
35.357
20.62
26.11
4.1423
Skewness
1.0203
-10.568
0.74735
-0.53767
-0.38051
0.36256
kurtosis
3.3688
145.73
2.4594
2.2141
3.3957
0.69629
finance
15
finance
16
Case 8.3.1
finance
17
Case8.3.1
2. ARCH-LM test
; In menu of the
estimated OLS model
click [Tests][ARCH]
; In [Lag order ]fill "1"
at this time, for example.
Discussion
p-value = 0.6611
do not reject H0: No ARCH effects up to lag 1.
finance
18
8.3.1
GJR-garchm
; Open "ex-IBM-2004-2009.gdt"
; Make sure to have access to Internet
Download the function package " GJR-garchm" from gretl server
That is, in menu of gretlclick [File][Function File][On server] as
shown in Fig. 8.3.4
finance
19
finance
20
finance
21
Case 8.3.2
mean eq.
Please use AR(3,25) models
(The key of case is on estimation of variance eq. of GARCH models)
r_ibm = 0.0771 r_ibm(3) + 0.0992 r_ibm(25) + u
[0.0025]
(8.3.1)
[0.0001]
finance
22
finance
23
2. Add "list"
In gretl click [Add][define new variable]in what followsenter
list x0 = r_ibm_3 r_ibm_25
finance
24
Fig.
8.3.7
x0
finance
25
3. GJR-garchm
; click [File][Function
File]On local
It means to estimate
GARCH(1,1)
The list "x0"
Number of lags to
do Q and Q 2 tests
on residuals
; double clicks on
GJR-garchm
; Fill the parameters as
shown
Check here to
save standardized
residuals and h
26
finance
27
4. Q and Q2 tests on
standardized residuals of
AR(3,25)-GARCH(1,1)
models
Testing Results suggest:
no autocorrelations & no
ARCH effects left
Coefficients of
AR(3,25)-GARCH(1,1)
finance
28
5. Delete insignificant
variables in mean eq,
re-estimate GARCH(1,1)
models
since coef. of r_ibm(3)
r_ibm(25) are insignificant.
Re-estimate
r_ibm = u
ht = + 1ut-12 +1 ht-1
; Only residuals in mean eq.
In Step 3, fill "null" in [Indep. Var] in
GJR-garchm
; Do Q and Q2 tests on
standardized resid. up to lag 10
finance
29
Case 8.3.2
Estimation results
The estimated variance eq.
ht = 0.0703 + 0.1293ut-12 +0.8365 ht-1
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
finance
30
finance