Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First African American & Democrat Can't Get Fair Trial
First African American & Democrat Can't Get Fair Trial
First African American & Democrat Can't Get Fair Trial
Causes can include acquaintanceship with either of the parties, one of the attorneys
or a witness, or the potential juror's expression of inability to be unbiased due to
prior experience in a similar case.
Nadel dismissed a potential juror before the hearing started on Monday morning.
According to defense attorney, Clyde Bennett II, she appeared to be black, from the
answers to her questionnaire. Bennett complained after Nadel dismissed the
potential juror before the hearing began, Judge, I should have had the opportunity
to question that juror.
Prosecutor Joseph Deters released a press release, just three days before the trial,
accusing Judge Hunter of being responsible for the deaths of two black boys, who
killed each other in mid-August. One of the boys appeared before Judge Hunter last
year in September for minor charges. The most he could have served was 6 months.
Deters suggested that the boy should have been locked up until he was 21. News
reports stated that the youth had come before several judges in the past for a total
of 36 charges prior to getting to Hunters docket. The other judges who handled the
first 36 charges were not named. The childs mother said Hunter ruled justly and
she does not blame Hunter for her sons death.
Bennett believes Deters statements were a deliberate attempt to taint the
potential jury. He re-introduced his motion to have court proceedings moved from
Hamilton County for prosecutor vindictiveness.
Carol Freas, a white Hunter supporter feels this jury selection process is a violation
of Hunters sixth amendment right to a fair trial. The jury should represent the
community in terms of race, gender, and national origin. With a jury that is 90%
white, while in contrast 90% of youth in Hamilton County detention centers are
African-American, how can Judge Hunter possibly get a fair trial? This jury pool
certainly doesnt represent the racial composition in Hamilton County, or a jury of
Judge Hunters peers.
Hunters attorney has not received requested discovery evidence requested in April
from the State of Ohio and the juvenile court. Nadel denied Bennetts motion to
suppress 800 pages submitted to him last Thursday that the prosecutor intends to
use for prosecution, despite Bennetts contention that he would not have the
opportunity to properly prepare for Hunters defense given the late nature of this
submission of evidence.
This is clearly racially imbalanced with 10 white jurors and 2 blacks, leaving Hunters
fate in the hands of a majority white jury in a case, which will most certainly carry
religious and racial undertones in a historically racially charged city. Police killings
of 15 unarmed black men led to a subsequent boycott and several uprisings in
Cincinnati in 2001.
Despite empty seats many Hunter supporters were not allowed in the courtroom
throughout pre-trial hearings and on the first two days of jury selection.
The treasurers office employee accused a black juror of hugging Judge Hunter after
Mondays hearing. The accused juror publicly denied the accusation in the media.
Nadel did not view courtroom tapes to confirm these accusations, considering
Hunters nearly 25 years on the bench and her understanding of potential juror
interaction.
Another potential juror said he was a distant cousin of Judge Hunter. He was
excused along with the remaining potential slate. Judge Hunter said she doesnt
know the potential juror. Supporters are calling for a Justice Department
investigation into how so many people with conflicts of interest and connections to
Hamilton County came to be selected? Donate to:
http://www.gofundme.com/bmgc2k.
###