Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Are LED T8s Ready For Prime Time 1-3-13
Are LED T8s Ready For Prime Time 1-3-13
blended rate
1.1
reduced AC savings x
existing
type
annual
watts
elect. cost
4 F34T12 CW
2650 lumen
lamps, 2 2lamp energy
saving
magnetic
144
ballasts,
angled sides
with good
white paint &
clear prismatic
lens
15
proposed
lamp life
end of
@ 12
life lamp
hour
lumens
cycles
$75.60 25,000
appr.
end of
end of
improved
life
life lamp thermals and
fixture
lumens
fixture
lumens
efficiency x
lamp life
@ 12
hour
cycles
notes
watts
watt
reduction
annual
elect.
savings
68
76
$43.89
$0.00
$260.00 5.9
incen- tive
appr.
installed
cost
payback
(yrs)
comprehensive
long term
benefit
4760
1.10
50,000
(iffy in
5236 enclosed
fixture)
5077
1.35
6854
36,000 42,000
58
86
$49.67
$15.05
$58.00 0.9
$1,074.51
1.30
7056
52,000 62,000
65
79
$45.62
$13.83
$60.00 1.0
$1,048.77
1.40
7108
36,000 42,000
58
86
$49.67
$15.05
$68.00 1.1
$1,064.51
1.35
7328
52,000 62,000
65
79
$45.62
$13.83
$70.00 1.2
$1,038.77
much less
$661.69 light long
term
footnotes: Numbers in colored boxes can be changed, which automatically alters computations.
Copyright of Stan Walerczyk, LC, principal of Lighting Wizards. December 22, 2012 version.
blended rate
1.1
reduced AC savings x
existing
type
3 basic grade
2800 lumen
F32T8s,
generic 3lamp .88 BF
electronic
instant start
ballast, angled
sides with
good white
paint & clear
prismatic lens
89
$46.73 20,000
15
proposed
retrofit and relamping options
appr.
end of
improved
life lamp thermals
lumens and fixture
efficiency x
notes
end of
lamp life
life
@ 3 hour
fixture
cycles
lumens
watts
watt
reduction
51
38
$21.95
$0.00
$200.00 9.1
annual
elect.
savings
incen- tive
appr.
installed
cost
payback
(yrs)
comprehensive
long term
benefit
4200
1.10
50,000
(iffy in
4620 enclosed
fixture)
5077
1.30
6600
30,000 40,000
58
31
$17.90
$5.43
$58.00 2.9
$323.38
1.30
6280
46,000 60,000
58
31
$17.90
$5.43
$60.00 3.0
$348.23
1.40
5670
30,000 40,000
46
43
$24.83
$7.53
$68.00 2.4
$461.01
1.35
6522
46,000 60,000
58
31
$17.90
$5.43
$70.00 3.6
$338.23
much less
$227.93 long term
light
footnotes: Numbers in colored boxes can be changed, which automatically alters computations.
Copyright of Stan Walerczyk, LC, principal of Lighting Wizards. December 22, 2012 version.
The DOE has done numerous testing of LED T8s and incumbents. There is a lot of information at
the DOE Solid State Lighting website, which you can get to by Google searching doe ssl. One
very good DOE document is LED Performance Specification Series: T8 Replacement Lamps,
which requires at least 2700 lumens while not exceeding 20W.
The Department of Energy (DOE) and others have found that many LED T8s shine most of the
light straight down, which can provide sufficient light there, but not enough light between fixtures
and on walls. LED T8s are terrible in parabolic troffers, because with no uplight, the top of the
fixtures are dark. These are not problems with fluorescent T8s.
Safety may be the most important concern.
Some manufacturers may not warranty their lamp holders to hold LED T8s, which are considerably
heavier than fluorescent T8s, and to powered by continuous 277 line voltage.
Installing LED T8s, especially when keeping the existing fluorescent type of lamp holders, may
void the UL listing of the fixture, which was UL listed as a fluorescent fixture. If that is the case and
if something bad happens, like a fire, the insurance policy may not cover damages.
The most common LED T8s have internal drivers, so the existing fluorescent ballast should be
bypassed and line voltage should go to the lamp holders. What some retrofitters and end-users do,
to save time, is to use some of the wire that went from the ballast to the lamp holder. But that wire
may be the wrong color and gauge, which may not meet electrical code.
UL has found that some of the LED T8s create fires in fixtures with internally shunted T8 lamp
holders. Numerous relatively new T8 fixtures with instant start ballasts have internally shunted
lamp holders with just one input jack.
What if somebody replaces an LED T8 that has line voltage, especially 277V, to the lamp holders
with a fluorescent T8? Fluorescent T8 lamp manufacturers have stated that this could cause
significant damage.
Are LED T8s more environmentally friendly than fluorescent T8s? Yes, fluorescent lamps do have
mercury, and LEDs do not. But there are several issues with LEDs, including toxic chemicals used
in production, amount of water required in production and the amount of metal that is mined,
melted and transported for heat sinking. The DOE has not yet determined if LEDs are really more
environmentally friendly cradle to cradle. But some LED T8 marketing literature and sales people
state toxic when referring to fluorescent. Fluorescent lamps now have much less mercury than in
the past. Now most fluorescent T8s have 1.7 to 5.0 mg, which is considerably less than what is in
typical can of tuna fish. Plus many areas require fluorescent lamp recycling.
I have also seen LED T8 literature and heard sales people stating that fluorescent T12 and T8
lamps only last 10,000 or 15,000 hours, which is incorrect. As shown above, there are fluorescent
T8s, which are rated for up to 62,000 hours, which is longer than the ratings on most LED T8s.
DesignLights Consortium (DLC) has approved some LED T8s in two classifications. One is LED
T8s, and the other is lamp-style retrofit kits in the linear panels category. If LED T8s do not have
sufficient lumens to qualify as individual products, two or more typical LED T8s may qualify in the
lamp-style retrofit kit category, mainly because of the higher lumens from more than one lamp in
this pseudo kit. Is this just gamesmanship?
http://www.designlights.org/solidstate.about.QualifiedProductsList_Publicv2.php
It is my understanding the California large investor owned utilities, which include Pacific Gas &
Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison, which generally will provide
rebates on DLC listed products, will not rebate any LED T8s, even if they are approved one way or
the other by the DLC. Hopefully other rebate organizations will not rebate LED T8s. I do not
understand why ConEd in New York is accepting rebates on LED T8s.
It is usually not a good idea to cram LED technology into incumbent shapes, including 1 diameter
and 4 long lamps.
I ask manufacturers to stop trying to sell LED T8s in North America, but develop LED light bars,
which could be about 1 wide and 4 long. These could be screwed into the top of the fixture, using
the entire fixture as a heat sink. Having the light higher in the fixture could also help improving side
light out of the fixture. The driver could be installed in the ballast compartment, which would be
better for heat for both the LEDs and driver. The existing lamp holders would not be used. One
existing example is the Albeo T8 Conversion kits. If you are not aware, GE recently bought Albeo.
Here is an installation video of the Albeo LED light bar kit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbxCzjfJp-A
Several manufacturers have already developed or are in the process of developing hardwired LED
kits with their own optics and lenses, which in most applications is much better than just LED T8s
or LED light bars, while keeping existing lenses or louvers.
There are already some very good dimmable and fixed Kelvin LED troffers, including the Cree CR,
Finelite LED HPR and Lithonia RTLED. Pricing on some of these can be as low as $200 or lower.
There are also some good dimming and Kelvin changing LED troffers and troffer kits, such as from
PlanLED, which cost about the same and have the same lumens per watt as fixed equivalents, but
also go from warm to cool white. PlanLED also has dimming and Kelvin changing task lights.
Please check out the Human Centric Lighting website.
http://humancentriclighting.com/