Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nonlinear G MM
Nonlinear G MM
Walter Sosa-Escudero
X
U (ct+i )
Et
(1 + )i
i=0
subject to:
At+i = (1 + r)At+i1 + yt+i ct+i
lim Et At+i (1 + r)i = 0
Assume that:
U (ct+i ) =
c1
t+i
1
c
ct
Et
=0
1 + t+1
We will use this knowledge to obtain consistent estimates for and
, the deep parameters of the problem.
Walter Sosa-Escudero
c
, = (, )0 and zt is a
t
0 t+1
vector of n variables that are orthogonal to g(xt+i , 0 ).
T
X
!0
g(xt+i , )zt
t=1
Walter Sosa-Escudero
T
X
!
g(xt+i , )zt
t=1
1
2
Walter Sosa-Escudero
Identification:
1
2
6= 0 for all 6= in .
Global identification: E[f (vi , )]
Regularity on derivatives: f (vi ; )/0 is p q matrix that
exists and is continuous on for each vi V ; ii) 0 is an
interior point of ; iii) E[f (vi ; )/]=0exists and is finite.
Local identification: E[f (vi ; )/]=0 = p.
Compactness: is compact.
Walter Sosa-Escudero
Identification
6= 0 for all 6= 0 is
The global identification condition E[f (vi , )]
difficult to characterize. Remember that in the IV case we tied
identification to a rank condition.
Local identification refers to conditions that hold in a small
neighborhood of 0 .
Under the assumed regularity conditions, we can expand f (.)
around 0 in a small neighborhood of 0 :
f (vi , ) ' f (vi , 0 ) +
Walter Sosa-Escudero
f (vi , 0 )
( 0 )
0
f (vi , 0 )
( 0 )
0
Taking expectations and using the moment conditions
f (vi , 0 )
E[f (vi , )] ' E
( 0 )
0
f (vi , ) ' f (vi , 0 ) +
Walter Sosa-Escudero
t=1
Asymptotics 1: Consistency
Walter Sosa-Escudero
any 6= 0 .
p
Result 2: Q0 () Qn () uniformly on .
Intuition:
if we fix at some point, by the LLN
Pn
p
t=1 f (vi , ) E[f (vi , )] and by assumption Wn W ,
then by continuity the result follows.
It is more difficult to make the uniform statement.
Walter Sosa-Escudero
Intuition of consistency:
n minimizes Qn ().
p
Qn () Q0 () uniformly.
0 minimizes Q0 ()
p
Then n 0
We will work out through a detailed proof in the homework.
Walter Sosa-Escudero
Asymptotics 2: Normality
Now we are in much more familiar territory...
P
P
Let gn () n1 nt=1 f (vi , ) and Gn () n1 ni=1 f (vi , )/0 .
Then, the FOCs of the GMM problem are:
Gn (n )0 Wn gn (n ) = 0
at 0 :
Now take a mean value expansion of gn (n)
gn (n ) = gn (0 ) + Gn ( ) n 0
where lies between and 0 . Now replace above:
Gn (n )0 Wn gn (0 ) + Gn (n )0 Wn Gn ( ) n 0 = 0
Walter Sosa-Escudero
Gn (n )0 Wn gn (0 ) + Gn (n )0 Wn Gn ( ) n 0 = 0
n n 0 = Gn (n )0 Wn Gn ( ) Gn (n )0 Wn n gn (0 )
n n gn (0 )
= M
n Gn (n )0 Wn Gn ( ) Gn (n )0 Wn . Sounds familiar?.
with M
Walter Sosa-Escudero
n n gn (0 )
n n 0 = M
p
Gn (n )0 Wn Gn ( ) Gn (n )0 Wn G00 W G0 G00 W M0
f (vi ; 0 ) d
N (0, S)
ngn (0 ) = n t=1
n
Then by Slutzkys theorem
d
n n gn (0 )
n n 0 = M
N (0, M0 SM00 )
Walter Sosa-Escudero
c
, = (, )0 and zt is a
t
0 t+1
vector of n variables that are orthogonal to g(xt+i , 0 ).
T
X
!0
g(xt+i , )zt
t=1
Walter Sosa-Escudero
T
X
!
g(xt+i , )zt
t=1
Data:
x1t = ct1 /ct
x2t = 1 + rt
In these terms, the moment conditions can be written as:
Et x1,t+1 x2,t+1 1 zt = 0
with (1 + )1 . Following Hansen and Singleton, for zt we will
take a constant, rt and ct1 /ct .
Walter Sosa-Escudero