Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Focus April 2015
Focus April 2015
Contents
Gospel - Page 3
2|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
Editorial
Revisiting Culture and the Gospel
The relationship between culture and the Gospel is a
continually recurring theme. We partially dealt with this
theme in part IV of the series on Everyday Theolgy .
Familiarity with words often prevents us to search for real
insights, and we take things for granted. We draw out
conclusions without proving the premises, and often assert
the premises without examining the terms. Therefore, let us
make sure what exactly we mean by culture and the Gospel.
1
3|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
References:
1. Zac Varghese, Everyday Theology Part IV, FOCUS Vol.
2(3), July, 2014
2. Richard Niebuhr, Christ and Culture, New York: Harper
and Row, 1951
3. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, translated by
H. Barns, New York, 1956.
4. The Nottingham Statement, the official statement of the
Second National Evangelical Anglican Congress, April,
1977.
4|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
Feb. 2015
We are waiting for the Maramon Convention, which
enables us to rethink about the possibilities of the
church. Let us glorify our Lord who led us throughout
past. God asked in the beginning of creation where is
your brother? Questions such as where are you and
where is your brother? are still relevant in our lives. The
question where are you? reminds us about where we
are now; it points out to the direction where we need to
be in the future. What is our relationship with God? The
question where is your brother? reminds us that we are
the keepers of our brethren. Individuals, families, and
countries need to move into a fellowship of brotherhood.
When countries are going through several conflicts, this
question has a greater relevance. Poly Carpus, a
disciple of Apostle John, who refused to renounce his
faith is still able to provide us the much needed power in
our faith life. He faced the end with a smile and became
a martyr for Christ. The witnessing of Stephanos, the
first martyr of the earlier church, is also same. Those
who are receiving the call to be witnesses of Christ must
5|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
6|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
MESSAGE FROM
ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY
The Archbishop of Canterbury's Ecumenical Easter Letter
7|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
8|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
9|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
10|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
11|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
12|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
been made. A search for the unity of all creation will ultimately
lead us to a vision of Gods invisible nature in creation. In a
larger view of religion (i.e. the concept of panentheism-God is
involved in creation, but not identified with the cosmos), we
find a combination of the best of science and the best insights
of religion (Mathai Zachariah) what we need today is an
ecological model of God. This vision alone will give us the
required spirituality for human survival. As nature is an open
book for all to read, man should celebrate diversity in the very
texture of creation. To discover, to appreciate and to promote
the rich diversity in the order of creation takes us to the divine.
The book of Job chapter 12 verses7 and 8 make it clear that
the flora and fauna carry a message for the wellbeing of the
humans (cf. Proverbs 6:6-9).
As plurality is integral to reality, there is always a challenge
before us to live with the knowledge of unity in diversity. The
great theological task before us today is to affirm the unity of
purpose in Gods order of creation. The riddle of the
philosophical question of the one and the many can only be
answered through Ecology. The ecological model of God leads
us to a larger view of religion and religious life .The words of
Cerdric Wright are worth quoting: A tree is a symbol of nonviolence. From its mute form there flows poise in silence, a
lovely sound of motion in response to windTrees do not
scream for attention. A tree has no pretense A tree retains its
deep serenity. It is widely maintained that without an earth
ethics, the possibility of creating world community and peace is
faint (See Larry Rasmussens book Earth Community, Earth
Ethics, WCC 1966). It is a naked truth that the most
oppressed are most intimately connected with nature. For
example dalits are related to the land; tribals to the forests and
fisher folks to the sea. The indigenous community regards
violence against nature as a matter of violations of human
rights. New social conflicts arise out of the frustrations of the
wretched of the earth. The Creation story as depicted in the
book of Genesis makes it clear that land, water and people
belong one cluster of human existence.
Kingdom of God-Call to live with ecological sensitivity
The teaching of Jesus gives us a blue print of
vasudaivakudumbakam with concern for all .In the parable of
the Mustard Seed (St.Mark.4:30-32), there is a divine call to
care for the least and to value the inherent potential of all that
is good and noble. To live in the midst of flora and fauna with
an ecological sensitivity is indeed the celebration of life. For
Jesus, all that is seen and unseen unfold the face of true
humanity in its pristine form. The reference to the Sun and the
rain (Matt.5:45).;the scorching heat and the south
wind(Lk.12:55);the clouds and the showers(Lk.12:54);the earth
and the sky(Lk.12:56);the flashing of light;(Matt.24:27);the rock
and the sand (Matt.7:26); the seeds and the grains(Matt.4:28)the lilies and the grass(Matt.6:28-30); the thorns and the
thistles(Matt.7:16); the figs and the grapes(Matt.7:16); the moth
and the rust (Matt.6:19-20); the sparrows and the
eagles(Matt.10:29); the dogs(Lk.16:21) the fish and the serpent
as well as the scorpions(Lk.11:11); the sheep and the
goats(Matt.25:32). etc are imageries taken by Jesus to illustrate
Gods care of the universe. The eco paradigms in his teachings
of the Kingdom make space for all in the household of God.
The scientific and economic assumption of development is a
th
13|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
14|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
15|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
That is why there is art in culture. Art is the outlet for the
sublime. The sublime cannot be accommodated, routinely, in
the framework of culture. It has to be canonized and
assigned safe grottos. Art is some such. In religion we have
worship and fellowship. We have Sundays. We have the gifts
of the Spirit (but not the fruit of the Spirit!). All these belong to
the art of Christianity. This is not bad, but not sufficient.
God is Spirit, Jesus said to the Samaritan woman, and they
that worship him must worship in spirit and in truth. (Jn. 4:
24). The Samaritan woman knew the Gospel, if you like, as
art. Art must have its stages and galleries. The temple on
Mount Gerizim, like the Jerusalem temple, or our churches,
simple or grand, are such stages and galleries. The spirit
and truth part cannot be confined thereto. The Spirit blows,
Jesus said to Nicodemus, where it pleases. The Spirit
knows no stage or gallery. Or, life is the gallery of the Spirit.
The authentic artistic expression of the Gospel is life in all its
fullness (Jn. 10: 10).
While we are on the subject of life, let me say this. Culturally
life is a physical entity, which gets incorporated into
demography. You become one among many. The more you
conform the better it is. But this is a lie! Every new life is a
new expression of the inexhaustible possibilities that God
has written into creation. This is far too complex for culture
even to take cognizance of. Culture must function in terms of
types and stereotypes. Individual uniqueness is too much of
a burden, a sort of cultural puzzle. But this is the foremost
redeeming feature of our species. We are not, thank God,
clones and carbon copies. We are unique. That is why the
Bible says God calls us by our names. Life is, in the end, an
16|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
17|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
18|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
such as profit,
confrontation?
competition,
success,
pleasure
and
Conclusion
No culture is static. We shouldnt absolute any culture.
There is no Christian culture per se. We have to
underscore the interpenetration of cultures. Cultural
domination, absolutist claims for a particular culture are all
anachronistic. Homogenization of culture shouldnt exist.
Diversity is within the plan of God. Hence, we need to
highlight a conglomeration of cultures.
In conclusion, let me quote a prayer from the Collects of the
Uniting Church in Australia, which is relevant for all
cultures:
In the midst of hunger and war, we celebrate the promise of
plenty and peace;
In the midst of oppression and tyranny, we celebrate the
promise of service and freedom;
In the midst of doubt and despair, we celebrate the promise
of faith and hope;
In the midst of fear and betrayal, we celebrate the promise
of love and life;
In the midst of sin and decay, we celebrate the promise of
salvation and renewal;
In the midst of death on every side, we celebrate the
promise of the living Christ.
19|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
20|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
21|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
1PremaKurien.TheImpactofInternationalMigrationon
HomeChurches:
TheMarThomaSyrianChristianChurchinIndiainthe
JournalfortheScienticStudyofReligion.2014.53(1).p.
115(Subsequentpagenumberscitedinthisreviewrefers
tothisarticle).
2P.119
3P.114
4ThechantswerenottranslatedfromMalayalambut
composedintheEnglishlanguage,intheAmerican
context,forthisspecificpurpose.
5GeevargheseMarTheodosius,thecurrentdiocesan
bishop,whohasbeenspearheadingamovementto
contextualizetheliturgyandprogramsoftheDiocese,
statedrecentlythatoutofthe50HolyCommunion
serviceshehadledinthevariousparishesofNorth
AmericaandEuropeduring2013,onlyfourwere
celebratedinMalayalamandtherestwereinEnglish.
22|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
Dioceses priorities and these are being carried out in a nonsectarian manner, as essentially American programs. The
parishes too have their own programs and priorities. Many
have Neighborhood Mission, conducted in an ecumenical
spirit, in partnership with the local (non-Indian) churches. It is
important to note that 90% of the financial resources raised by
Mar Thoma parishes in North America are used within this
region, mainly for these programs. As such, there is a grave
danger in seeing the parishes as mere branches that exist to
generate financial resources for the Church in Kerala. No
doubt, a certain amount of Kerala-influence will linger on in
MTC in America; however, that is unlikely to be primarily for
economic reasons.
Transnational linkages for immigrant groups are unmistakable
and there is no doubt that various ethnic and linguistic groups
will continue to co-exist in the Mar Thoma Church too. Yet,
such linkages are more than those between the
headquarters and branches with the latter existing
primarily to support the structure and programs of the former.
Just as the Greek Orthodox Church in America is today more
American than Greek, as the African Methodist Episcopal
Church is more American than African, the Mar Thoma Church
in America too is set on a path that is more indigenous, local
and authentic, even as the Church continues to retain
significant historic and traditional links with India and liturgical
links with the Syrian heritage. Philipose Mar Chrysostom
locates this distinction in the context of the theological
direction of the Church: the Mar Thoma Church in America
and the American Mar Thoma Church ought to be different
The Mar Thoma Church in Kerala and the Mar Thoma Church
in Chennai or Delhi should not be the same. I mean the
Church is the same, but the expression should vary if it
belongs to the Church. Michael Kinnamon, in his capacity as
the General Secretary of the National Council of Churches in
USA, too affirmed this reality from an American perspective:
The NCC members do not think of the Mar Thoma Church as
an Indian Church with branch office in America, but as an
American church with deep roots in India. The Mar Thoma
Church is a global Church now sharing the heritage in different
countries and at the same time growing on the local areas
with the diversified manifestations of its nature.
Conclusion
The New-generation Churches and their impact on the youth
and others in the Church that the author points out , are real,
but the extent and scope of such impact needs to be closely
scrutinized. In his study of Christian fundamentalism and
Communication in India, Pradip Thomas too had argued that
such Christian groups are creating genuine challenges for the
aspirations of pluralist societies, particularly in the South.
6
6JesudasAthyal&JohnThatamanil(ed.).Metropolitan
ChrysostomonMissionintheMarketplace(Tiruvalla:CSS,2002.p.
119.
7Quotedin,JesudasAthyal:BeyondtheDiaspora:Challenges
andConcernsbeforetheMarThomaChurchin,MarThoma
Church:IdentityandMissionintheContextofMultiplicityedited
byRev.K.E.GeevargheseandDr.MathewT.Thomas(NewYork:
DioceseofNorthAmericaandEurope,2014).pp.9293.
8P.123.
9PradipThomas.StrongReligion,ZealousMedia:Christian
FundamentalismandCommunicationinIndia.LosAngeles,
London,NewDelhi,Singapore:SAGEPublications,2008.
23|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
10SoongChanRah.2013.TheEndofChristianityinAmerica?
http://www.patheos.com/Resources/Additional
Resources/EndofChristianityinAmerica.html(Cited,
September25,2014)
11ForarecentdiscussionontherelevanceofEastern
formsofChristianity,see,HeHasMadetheDryBones
Live:OrientalismsAttemptedResuscitationofEastern
ChristianitybyChristopherD.L.JohnsoninJournalofthe
AmericanAcademyofReligion(Vol.82,Number3,
September2014)pp.811840.
24|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
25|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
that love. Greater love has no one than this, than to lay
down ones life for his friends (John 15:13).
Jesus has developed the Cultural Competence, the
ability to interact comfortably and confidently with the
people of any culture. When Jesus decided to travel from
Judea to Jerusalem, He opted to travel through Samaria,
a region avoided by most of the Jews, since they believe
that Samaritans are not to be a group of people to be
interacted by Jews, because Jews considered
Samaritans as low cast people. But, Jesus, not only
preferred to travel through Samaria, but also interacted
with the Samaritan woman at the well as described in
John 4: 1-26. She was even surprised that Jesus being a
Jew interacted with her and even asked for water to
drink. Thus He not only told us to love each other but also
showed us how to interact with others irrespective of their
race, culture or sexuality.
Throughout the ministry of Jesus, He preached among
people of all nations and culture in an around the places
he lived and traveled. It is surprise to note that nowhere in
the Bible, there is any mention where Jesus lived
especially during the 3- years of His public ministry. He
wanted to be with the people of all culture and regions
and language. He even has disciples from different
cultural background appointed by Him to complete His
ministry in this world. He did not preach to only people of
one culture or one nation. He traveled around interacted
with prostitutes, tax collectors, who are considered as the
untouchables according to the Jewish religious culture.
He invited the fishermen, the ordinary men to become
extraordinary people as His disciples. He was even
criticized by the Pharisees for interacting with such
people of low culture according to Jewish system. But
Jesus did not pay any attention to such criticisms and
even fought against the evils of the culture of the society
in which He lived. One such example was His interactions
in the Jerusalem temple by turning the tables of the
people who made the temple a market place.
But the Christ Culture created by Jesus was lost again
and Christians developed their own culture based on the
standards of the society in which they lived. The
Christians in order to become the true witnesses of Jesus
must rise to the level of the culture established by Jesus.
Christians should live like the lotus plant with its flowers
above the muddy water with beautiful colors by
nourishing those around it. Christians should be same like
the lotus plants even though it lives in the muddy pond
and depend for everything for its growth from the pond,
but it rises above the water and creates its own culture
not mixed with the culture of the pond in which it lives.
Thus when Christians rise above the cultural backgrounds
of their society and adorn the culture of Christ, they are
considered as true witnesses of Jesus Christ.
26|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
27|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
28|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5
29|P a g e F O C U S A p r i l 2 0 1 5