Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0360319904004434 Main PDF
1 s2.0 S0360319904004434 Main PDF
1 s2.0 S0360319904004434 Main PDF
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhydene
Abstract
A linear relationship between the behavior ( vs. E) of the phase shift (0 90 ) for the optimum intermediate
frequency and that ( vs. E) of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of over-potentially deposited hydrogen (OPD H) for
the cathodic H2 evolution reaction (HER), i.e., the phase-shift method, at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface
has been veried using cyclic voltammetric, differential pulse voltammetric, and ac impedance techniques. The phase-shift
method for determining the suitable adsorption isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of OPD H for the cathodic HER at the
interface also has been proposed. At the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm
( vs. E) of OPD H, the equilibrium constant (K =1.3104 ) for OPD H and the standard free energy (G0ads =22.2 kJ/mol)
of OPD H are determined using the phase-shift method. At the same interface, the Temkin adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) of
OPD H, the equilibrium constant (1.3 103 K 1.3 105 with , i.e., 0 1) for OPD H, and the standard free
energy (16.5 G0 27.9 kJ/mol with , i.e., 0 1) of OPD H are also determined using the phase-shift method. At the
intermediate values of , i.e., 0.2 < < 0.8, the Langmuir and Temkin adsorption isotherms of OPD H for the cathodic HER
at the interface are converted to each other. The equilibrium constant (K0 ) for the Temkin adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) is
ca. 10 times greater than that (K) for the corresponding Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E). The interaction parameter
(g) for the Temkin adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) is ca. 4.6 greater than that (g) for the corresponding Langmuir adsorption
isotherm ( vs. E). These numbers (10 times and 4.6) can be taken as constant conversion factors between the corresponding
adsorption isotherms (Temkin, Langmuir, Frumkin). The Temkin adsorption isotherm corresponding to the Langmuir or the
Frumkin adsorption isotherm, and vice versa, can be effectively converted using the constant conversion factors. Both the
phase-shift method and constant conversion factors can be effectively used as a new electrochemical method to determine the
suitable adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of H for the cathodic HER in electrochemical systems.
2005 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Phase-shift method; Langmuir, Frumkin, and Temkin adsorption isotherms; Constant conversion factors; Hydrogen adsorption;
Pt electrode
1. Introduction
Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 940 5116;
For clean environment and energy, the cathodic H2 evolution reaction (HER) at noble and transition-metal/aqueous
0360-3199/$30.00 2005 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.12.005
1424
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
electrolyte interfaces has been extensively studied in electrochemistry and electrochemical hydrogen technologies.
Many experimental methods have been used to study the adsorption sites and processes of under-potentially deposited
hydrogen (UPD H) and over-potentially deposited hydrogen
(OPD H) for the cathodic HER at these interfaces [120].
It is well known that UPD H and OPD H occupy different
surface adsorption sites and act as two distinguishable electroadsorbed H species, while only OPD H can contribute to
the cathodic HER [4,68,1420]. However, the kinetics and
mechanism of the cathodic HER have been studied mainly
using steady-state polarization experiments. Thus, there is
not much reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data, i.e., the
equilibrium constant and standard free energy relating to
the adsorption sites and process of the OPD H, at these
interfaces.
At interfaces, it is preferable to consider the adsorption
isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) for H (UPD H,
OPD H) rather than an equation of the electrode kinetics
and thermodynamics for H (UPD H, OPD H), because
the adsorption isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) can
be associated more directly with the atomic mechanism
of H (UPD H, OPD H) adsorption. A link between the
microscopic system of adsorption sites and processes on
atoms and the macroscopic system of electrode kinetics and
thermodynamics at interfaces has been extensively studied
in chemistry, physical electrochemistry, surface science,
etc. [21]. The adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Frumkin,
Temkin) are effective for characterizing the relation, transition, and criterion between UPD H and OPD H for the
cathodic HER at interfaces. Thus, there is a technological
need for a fast, simple, and reliable technique to determine the suitable adsorption isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin,
Temkin) of H (UPD H, OPD H) for the cathodic HER
at interfaces.
For the cathodic HER in electrochemical systems, the
currentpotential relationship is determined completely by
the electrode potential (E) dependence of the fractional surface coverage () of H. Thus, one can interpret that the
electrode kinetic parameters for H will depend on the corresponding adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) of H, which relates
the surface concentration of H to the bulk concentration of
H and to the electrode potential (E). At limited values of ,
i.e., 0 and 1, the distinction between the adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of H is almost
impossible. At low and high values of , e.g., < 0.2 and
0.8 < , the distinction between the adsorption isotherms
(Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of H is difcult. At intermediate values of , e.g., 0.2 < < 0.8, the distinction between
the adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of
H is easy. It is related to the rate of change of vs. E, i.e.,
/E or d/dE, which is maximized at 0.5 and minimized at 0 and 1. However, a linear relationship between
the behavior ( vs. E) of the phase shift (0 90 )
for the optimum intermediate frequency and that ( vs. E)
of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of intermedi-
frequency and that ( vs. E) of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of H (UPD H, OPD H) at noble and transitionmetal/aqueous electrolyte interfaces has been veried using cyclic
voltammetric, linear sweep voltammetric or differential pulse
voltammetric, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopic techniques. The behavior ( vs. E) of the fractional surface coverage
(1 0) of intermediates is well known as the electrochemical
adsorption isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin).
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
2. Experimental
0.4
Current Density (i ) / mA cm-2
2.1. Preparations
1425
0.2
0.0
-0.2
A
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
Potential (E ) / V vs. RHE
15th scan
20th scan
1.2
1426
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
-0.85
-0.80
(b)
-0.75
(a)
-0.70
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
cm-2
-0.85
(b)
-0.80
(a)
-0.75
-0.70
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
cm-2
sured against the standard reference electrode.2 The negative overpotential, < 0, implies the cathodic HER at the
interface. It is well known that Tafel plots depend on the
technique of pretreatment.
The Tafel slopes shown in Figs. 2(a) or 3(a) and 2(b) or
3(b) are 31 and 122 mV/decade, respectively. These results
are similar to the typical Tafel slopes at noble metal (Pt, Ir,
Rh) electrode interfaces [1,38,27,31,37]. It is well known
that the Tafel slopes due to the rate-determining steps of the
proton discharge reaction and the electrochemical desorption are 30 and 120 mV/decade, respectively. Considering
the sequential reaction for the cathodic HER, one can interpret that the proton discharge reaction corresponding to
the Tafel slopes of 31 mV/decade shown in Figs. 2(a) and
3(a) is the rate-determining step for the cathodic HER at the
poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface. At high
current densities, as shown in Figs. 2(b) and 3(b), the Tafel
slopes are usually ca. 120 mV/decade. Also, considering the
high values of the fractional surface coverage () of OPD H
for the cathodic HER, i.e., 1 (refer to Fig. 9), one can
interpret that the electrochemical desorption corresponding
to the Tafel slopes of 122 mV/decade shown in Figs. 2(b)
and 3(b) is the rate-determining step for the cathodic HER
at the interface.
Comparing Figs. 2 and 3 with Fig. 1 shows that the Tafel
slopes of Figs. 2 and 3 are plotted beyond the UPD H regions. This implies that the Tafel slopes shown in Figs. 2(a)
and 3(a) are attributed to the OPD H for the cathodic HER
at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface.
From Figs. 2(a) and 3(a), one can understand that the range
of for the rate-determining step of the proton discharge reaction is ca. 0.694 to 0.780 V vs. RHE. The range of ,
ca. 0.694 to 0.780 V vs. RHE, corresponding to the Tafel
slopes shown in Figs. 2(a) and 3(a) is necessary for verifying the proton discharge reaction of the adsorption isotherm
(Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of OPD H for the cathodic
HER at the interface. This is discussed in more detail later.
3.3. Phase-shift prole for the optimum intermediate
frequency
The equivalent circuit for the cathodic HER is usually expressed as shown in Fig. 4(a) [38,39]. Taking into account
the various factors, e.g., the relaxation time effect, the surface diffusion process, the specic adsorption effect, etc.,
which are inevitable under the ac impedance experiment
[40,41], we dene the equivalent circuit elements shown in
Fig. 4(a). RS is the electrolyte resistance, RF is the equivalent resistance due to the adsorption process of OPD H and
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
RP
RF
CP
RS
CD
(a)
(b)
RS
RF
CP
its relaxation time effect at the interface, RP is the equivalent resistance due to the recombination reaction, CP is the
equivalent capacitance due to the adsorption process of OPD
H and its relaxation time effect at the interface, and CD is
the double-layer capacitance.
The two equivalent circuit elements, RF and CP , are the
equivalent resistance and capacitance associated with the
faradaic resistance (R ) and the adsorption pseudocapacitance (C ) of OPD H, respectively. Under the ac impedance
experiment, RF is smaller than R due to the surface diffusion process and the relaxation times of the previously
adsorbed hydrogen (OPD H), i.e., the increase of H+ on
the electrode surface. However, CP is greater than C due
to the surface diffusion process and the relaxation times
of the previously adsorbed hydrogen (OPD H), i.e., the increase of H+ on the electrode surface. Because a resistance
is inversely proportional to the concentration of charged
species, but a capacitance is proportional to the concentration charged species, the surface diffusion process and the
relaxation time effects of RF and CP can be compensated
together at the interface (refer to Eq. (2) and Table 1).
Note that both RF and CP cannot exist unless charge is
transferred across the interface. This implies that the behavior of RF and CP depends strongly on that of R and C
or , i.e., the proton discharge reaction of OPD H for the
cathodic HER. Therefore, the adsorption process of OPD H
corresponding to the combination of RF and CP can be correctly expressed in terms of the phase delay, i.e., the lagged
phase shift (). This aspect was not well interpreted in
our previously published papers [22,23]. The experimental results and discussions presented there are unchanged.
1427
However, it is well known that the fractional surface coverage () of H and the phase shift () depend on the applied
electrode potential (E) at the interface.
The frequency responses of the equivalent circuit shown
in Fig. 4(a) are essential for studying the relationship between the behavior ( vs. E) of the phase shift (0
90 ) for the optimum intermediate frequency and that
( vs. E) of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of
OPD H for the cathodic HER at the interface. At low frequencies, the equivalent circuit for all frequencies shown in
Fig. 4(a) can be expressed as a series circuit of RS , RF , and
RP . At high frequencies, the equivalent circuit for all frequencies shown in Fig. 4(a) can be expressed as a series circuit of RS and CD . At intermediate frequencies, the equivalent circuit for all frequencies shown in Fig. 4(a) can be
simplied as the series circuit of RS , RF , and CP shown in
Fig. 4(b). For a wide range of , i.e., except for low values,
CP is much greater than CD . In practice, CP includes CD .
In addition, RP is much greater than both RF and |1/CP |
for intermediate frequencies. Therefore, RP and CD can be
eliminated from the equivalent circuit for the cathodic HER
shown in Fig. 4(a). This implies that the simplied equivalent circuit for the intermediate frequencies shown in Fig.
4(b) can be applied to the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous
electrolyte interface regardless of H2 evolution. However,
the simplied equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 4(b) is not for
the change of the cathodic HER itself, but only the intermediate frequency response. The behavior of RF and CP depends strongly on that of R and C or . In other words, it
is valid for studying the adsorption sites and process of OPD
H at the interface. The frequency responses of the equivalent
circuit shown in Fig. 4(a) are described elsewhere [38,39].
The impedance (Z) of the equivalent circuit for the intermediate frequencies shown in Fig. 4(b) and the corresponding phase shift () are given by
Z = (RS + RF ) j/CP ,
(1)
(2)
(3)
1428
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
Table 1
Measured values of the equivalent circuit elements for the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz) and the estimated fractional surface
coverage () at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface
E (V vs. RHE)
RS + RF ( cm2 )
CP a (F cm2 )
b (deg)
(deg)
c
0.061
0.041
0.021
0.001
0.019
0.039
0.059
0.079
0.099
0.119
0.139
0.159
2.241
2.700
11.484
16.887
7.299
2.756
1.673
1.444
1.422
1.414
1.418
1.479
433
431
511
1147
4925
23,050
90,050
249,703
478,811
681,387
899,505
1,123,762
88.25
87.91
79.56
58.69
41.54
26.63
11.94
5.05
2.68
1.89
1.43
1.10
88.3
87.9
79.6
58.7
41.5
26.6
11.9
5.0
2.7
1.9
1.4
1.1
0
0.005
0.100
0.339
0.537
0.708
0.876
0.955
0.982
0.991
0.997
1
800
20
600
15
10
400
(b)
(a)
200
-0.2
).
-0.1
0.0
0.1
Potential (E ) / V vs. RHE
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
100
(a)
(b)
80
60
1429
(c)
40
(d)
20
(e)
(f)
(g)
0
20
40
60
80
2
3
Frequency ( log f ) / Hz
is discussed in more detail later. Consequently, one can interpret that the surface diffusion process and the relaxation
time effects of RF and CP are unique features for analyzing the adsorption sites and process of OPD H at the polyPt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface. The surface
diffusion process and the relaxation time effects of RF and
CP are compensated together at the interface (refer to Eq.
(2) and Table 1). The various effects on the adsorption process of OPD H are negligible at the interface.
Fig. 5 and Eq. (2) show that the real surface area problem
of the poly-Pt electrode is not important for studying the
phase-shift prole for the optimum intermediate frequency.
The real surface area effects of RF and CP are completely
compensated together. Also, the adsorption sites and process
of OPD H at the interface can be expressed in terms of the
lagged phase shift (). In practice, RF is greater than RS
for a wide range of (refer to Fig. 5 and Table 1), and
so described in Eq. (2) can be substantially determined
by the series circuit of RF and CP . In other words,
is substantially characterized by the adsorption sites and
process of OPD H, i.e., . This implies that the behavior (
vs. E) of the phase shift (0 90 ) for the optimum
intermediate frequency can be linearly related to that ( vs.
E) of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of OPD H,
i.e., the suitable adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) of OPD H,
at the interface. This is discussed in more detail later.
Fig. 6 compares the phase-shift curves ( vs. log f ) for
the different electrode potentials (E) at the poly-Pt/0.5 M
H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface. In this gure, and
vs. log f are markedly different at intermediate frequencies due to the combination of RF and CP , i.e., the adsorption process of OPD H, at the interface. The intermediate
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Potential ( E ) / V vs. RHE
0.4
Fig. 7. Phase-shift prole ( vs. E) for the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz) at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous
electrolyte interface.
frequency, i.e., a vertical solid line (ca. 5 Hz) on the phaseshift curves ( vs. log f ) shown in Fig. 6, can be set as the
optimum intermediate frequency for the phase-shift prole
( vs. E). Note that the optimum intermediate frequency
(ca. 5 Hz) indicates a maximum lagged phase shift on the
phase-shift curve ( vs. log f ) shown in Fig. 6(a).
At a maximum lagged phase shift for the optimum intermediate frequency, it appears that the adsorption process
of OPD H and the various effects at the interface are minimized. In other words, of the OPD H can be set to zero,
as shown in Table 1. Therefore, from Eq. (2) and Fig. 6,
has a maximum value of 90 , as shown in Fig. 6(a). At a
minimum lagged phase shift for the optimum intermediate
frequency, it appears that the adsorption process of OPD H
and the various effects at the interface are maximized or almost saturated. In other words, of the OPD H can be set to
unity, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, from Eq. (2) and Fig.
6, has a minimum value of 0 , as shown in Fig. 6(g).
Also, by comparing the calculated phase shift () with the
measured phase shift () shown in Table 1, one can interpret that the discussions on the simplied equivalent circuit
for the optimum intermediate frequency shown in Fig. 4(b)
and derived Eqs. (1)(3) are valid. The determination of the
optimum intermediate frequency for the phase-shift prole
( vs. E) is described elsewhere [2234].
Finally, the electrode potential (E) and the corresponding
phase shift (0 90 ) for the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz) at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface can be plotted as the phase-shift
prole ( vs. E) for the optimum intermediate frequency
(ca. 5 Hz) shown in Fig. 7. The same shape of vs. E
can also be obtained around the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz), e.g., 10 and 20 Hz, as shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 8 also shows that the determination of the optimum intermediate frequency for the phase-shift prole ( vs. E)
1430
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
1.0
5 Hz
10 Hz
20 Hz
20
40
60
80
experimental data
fitted data
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Potential ( E ) / V vs. RHE
0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Potential ( E ) / V vs. RHE
0.4
expressed as
[/(1 )] = KC +
H [exp(EF /RT )],
(4)
(5)
where (=E Er ) is the overpotential and Er is the reversible potential at the equilibrium.
For the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte (pH
0.46) interface, the tted data, i.e., the numerically calculated Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) for K = 1.3
104 using Eq. (4), are shown in Fig. 9. As expected, the
Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) shown in Fig. 9
can be linearly related to the phase-shift prole ( vs. E)
for the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz) shown
in Fig. 7. From Figs. 7 and 9, one infers that the Langmuir
adsorption isotherm for K = 1.3 104 is applicable to the
formation of OPD H at the interface. This also implies that
the applicability of the Frumkin adsorption isotherm ( vs.
E) of OPD H for the cathodic HER at the interface is trivial
(refer to Fig. 12). Figs. 10(a)(c) show the three numerically
calculated Langmuir adsorption isotherms corresponding to
K = 1.3 102 , 1.3 104 , and 1.3 106 , respectively.
The Langmuir adsorption isotherm shown in Fig. 9 is
attributed to OPD H for the cathodic HER. As discussed,
the Langmuir adsorption isotherm due to UPD H has not
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
1.0
Fractional Surface Coverage ()
1.0
0.8
0.6
(c)
(b)
(a)
0.4
0.2
0.0
1431
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
been observed at the cathodic potential range. It is understood that the adsorption sites of UPD H on the poly-Pt
electrode surface are almost masked due to the high H+
concentration in 0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte and/or
anionic adsorption effects under the steady-state conditions
[19,20,2325,30,31,46]. Note that the Langmuir adsorption
isotherm of OPD H shown in Fig. 9 or 10(b) is located
beyond the UPD H peaks (ca. 0.06 and 0.20 V vs. RHE)
on the cyclic voltammogram shown in Fig. 1. This implies
that the Langmuir adsorption isotherm of OPD H is located
beyond that of UPD H, which cannot be obtained at the
poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface. The
Langmuir adsorption isotherms ( vs. E) of UPD H and
transitions between UPD H and OPD H regions at noble
metal (Pt, Ir)/alkaline aqueous electrolyte interfaces are
described elsewhere [2325,30,31].
As discussed, the shape of the phase-shift prole (
vs. E) for the optimum intermediate frequency (ca. 5 Hz)
shown in Fig. 7 is the exact form of the Langmuir adsorption
isotherm ( vs. E) of OPD H shown in Fig. 9. Therefore,
one can interpret that the various assumptions and effects,
e.g., the simplied equivalent circuit for the optimum intermediate frequency, the relaxation time effect, the surface
diffusion process, the compensation effects, the lateral interaction effect, the homogeneous surface, etc., are well supplemented for the Langmuir adsorption isotherm of OPD H
at the interface. It especially appears that the assumption of
a linear relationship between the phase-shift prole ( vs.
E) for the optimum intermediate frequency and the Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) of OPD H is valid.
Fig. 11 compares three different ranges of , which are estimated using the measured phase shift () shown in Table
1 and through the previously described procedures, for the
Langmuir adsorption isotherm of OPD H, K = 1.3 104 ,
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
(6)
g r/RT ,
(7)
K = K0 exp(g),
(8)
1.0
Fractional Surface Coverage ()
1432
0.8
0.6
Langmuir
Frumkin
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Potential (E ) / V vs. RHE
0.4
(9)
Fig. 13 compares the experimentally determined Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) for K = 1.3 104
and the three numerically calculated Temkin adsorption isotherms ( vs. E) for K0 = 8.1 102 at the
poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface. Figs.
13(a)(c) show the three numerically calculated Temkin
adsorption isotherms corresponding to g = 0, 12, and 15,
respectively, at the same potential range for the Langmuir
adsorption isotherm. Under the Temkin adsorption conditions, as shown in Figs. 13(b) and (c), changes linearly
and more slowly with E than it does under the Langmuir
adsorption conditions. By comparing the Temkin adsorption
isotherms with the Langmuir adsorption isotherm shown
in Fig. 13, one can interpret that the applicability of the
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
1.0
( 0.0 < <1.0 )
0.8
0.6
(c)
(b) (a)
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
1.0
( 0.0 < <1.0 )
( 0.1 < < 0.9 )
0.8
0.6
Temkin
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
1433
The standard free energy of OPD H is given by the difference between the standard molar Gibbs free energy of
OPD H and that of a number of water molecules on the
adsorption sites of the poly-Pt electrode surface. Under the
Langmuir adsorption conditions, the relation between the
equilibrium constant (K) for OPD H and the standard free
energy (G0ads ) of OPD H is given [42] as follows:
2.3RT log K = G0ads .
(10)
1434
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
Table 2
Comparison of the equilibrium constants (K) for OPD H corresponding to the adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Temkin, Frumkin) of OPD
H and fractional surface coverages () at the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface
Adsorption isotherm
Langmuir (g = 0)
Temkin (g = 4.6)
Frumkin
K
01
= 0.5
1.3 104
1.3 103 K 1.3 105
1.3 104
5.2 104 > K > 3.3 105
1.3 104
1.3 104
(11)
and the phase-shift prole ( vs. E) for the optimum intermediate frequency. It appears that the phase-shift method
is a simple and efcient tool for determining the electrode
kinetic and thermodynamic data (, K, K0 , g, G0ads , G0 )
relating to the adsorption sites and processes of H (UPD
H, OPD H) for the cathodic HER at the interface. Note
that the other tedious procedures described in this paper are
only used to verify the validity of the phase-shift method.
However, at rst glance, it seems that there is no linear relationship between the phase-shift proles ( vs. E) for
the optimum intermediate frequencies and the adsorption
isotherms ( vs. E) of H (UPD H, OPD H) for the cathodic
HER at the interfaces [5053]. At present, the various effects on the adsorption sites and processes of H (UPD H,
OPD H) for the cathodic HER have not been combined into
a single equation for the linear relationship. Therefore, it
seems difcult to obtain a relationship based on theoretical
derivations or numerical calculations.
4. Conclusions
The phase-shift method for determining the suitable adsorption isotherm (Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of H (UPD
H, OPD H) for the cathodic HER in electrochemical systems
is proposed. The simplied equivalent circuit for the optimum intermediate frequency and the corresponding phaseshift equation are well tted to the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4
aqueous electrolyte interface. The phase-shift method experimentally veries that the behavior ( vs. E) of the
phase shift (0 90 ) for the optimum intermediate
frequency can be linearly related to that ( vs. E) of the fractional surface coverage (1 0) of OPD H, i.e., the Langmuir and Temkin adsorption isotherms ( vs. E) of OPD H,
at the interface. At the poly-Pt/0.5 M H2 SO4 aqueous electrolyte interface, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs.
E) of OPD H, the equilibrium constant (K =1.3104 ) for
OPD H and the standard free energy (G0ads = 22.2 kJ/mol)
of OPD H are determined using the phase-shift method. At
the same interface, the Temkin adsorption isotherm ( vs. E)
of OPD H, the equilibrium constant (1.3103 K 1.3
105 with , i.e., 0 1) for OPD H, and the standard free
energy (16.5 G0 27.9 kJ/mol with , i.e., 0 1) of
OPD H are also determined using the phase-shift method.
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436
At the intermediate values of , i.e., 0.2 < < 0.8, the Langmuir and Temkin adsorption isotherms of OPD H for the
cathodic HER at the interface are converted to each other.
The equilibrium constant (K0 ) for the Temkin adsorption
isotherm ( vs. E) is ca. 10 times greater than that (K)
for the corresponding Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs.
E). The interaction parameter (g) for the Temkin adsorption isotherm ( vs. E) is ca. 4.6 greater than that (g) for
the corresponding Langmuir adsorption isotherm ( vs. E).
These numbers (10 times and 4.6) can be taken as constant conversion factors between the corresponding adsorption isotherms (Temkin, Langmuir, Frumkin). The Temkin
adsorption isotherm corresponding to the Langmuir or the
Frumkin adsorption isotherm, and vice versa, can be effectively converted using the constant conversion factors.
The phase-shift method experimentally provides the link between the microscopic system of the adsorption sites and
process of OPD H on the atoms and the macroscopic system of the electrode kinetics and thermodynamics for OPD
H at the interface. Both the phase-shift method and constant conversion factors can be effectively used as a new
electrochemical method to determine adsorption isotherms
(Langmuir, Frumkin, Temkin) of intermediates for sequential reactions in electrochemical systems.
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Acknowledgements
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
References
[1] Wendt H, editor. Electrochemical hydrogen technologies.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1990.
[2] Protopopoff E, Marcus P. Effects of chemisorbed sulphur on
the hydrogen adsorption and evolution on metal single crystal
surfaces. J Chim Phys 1990;88:142352.
[3] Trasatti S. In: Gerisher H., Tobias CW, editors. Advances in
electrochemical science and engineering, vol. 2. New York:
VCH; 1992. p. 185.
[4] Gileadi E. Electrode kinetics. New York: VCH; 1993. p. 1649.
[5] Conway BE, Jerkiewicz G, editors. Electrochemistry and
materials science of cathodic hydrogen absorption and
adsorption, PV 94-21. Pennington, NJ: The Electrochemical
Society; 1995.
[6] Jerkiewicz G, Zolfaghari A. Comparison of hydrogen
electroadsorption from the electrolyte with hydrogen
adsorption from the gas phase. J Electrochem Soc
1996;143:12408.
[7] Zolfaghari A, Villiard F, Chayer M, Jerkiewicz G. Hydrogen
adsorption on Pt and Rh electrodes and blocking of
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
1435
1436
J.H. Chun et al. / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1423 1436