Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF (7) Jurnal
PDF (7) Jurnal
PDF (7) Jurnal
DOI 10.1007/s001340101060
V. Lindn
K. Palmr
J. Reinhard
R. Westman
H. Ehrn
T. Granholm
B. Frenckner
Introduction
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [1] is
used in the treatment of patients with extremely severe
but potentially reversible pulmonary disorders. Today
1644
A mobile ECMO cart for inter-hospital transports has been developed and customized (Fig. 1). A Stckert roller pump (10-00-00)
was mounted on the cart together with a bladder box (Seebrooke
SMS 3200), heating device (Seebrooke SMS 3000), blood pressure
(pre-oxygenator) monitoring device (Stckert control unit), and a
device for intracircuit saturation measurements (Baxter Oxysat).
The cart was equipped with handles so that it can easily be lifted
into the transport vehicle and firmly attached inside the vehicle.
A separate battery (Fiskars PS 20/1.6, 220 V, sine curve, 1,100 W,
5 Ah) was used for power backup during transport between the
ICU and transport vehicle. Standard ECMO disposables (Avecor
membrane oxygenator, Avecor heat exchanger, PVC tubing, Supertygon for raceway tubing, Avecor silicone rubber bladder) were
used with the size of the devices adjusted to the weight of the patient. An additional length of tubing was added to the circuit to facilitate patient movement while onloading and offloading in the
transport vehicle.
All electric items were tested individually regarding the electromagnetic field, after which the assembled total equipment was
tested together. The test protocols were scrutinized by The Swedish Board of Civil Aviation and the equipment was approved for
use in helicopter and aircraft.
Personnel
The transport team on call (24 h/day, all year round) consisted of
one ECMO physician, one ECMO coordinator, and one cannulating surgeon. The team had several years of ECMO experience,
were very familiar with transports, and were ready for take off
within 60120 min.
Transport to referring hospital
The transport to the referring hospital aimed to bring the personnel and equipment as quickly as possible to the patient. The mode
of transport depended upon the distance, the availability of the
1645
Table 1 Data of patients transported on ECMO. Diagnosis is given in neonates and cause of ARDS in pediatric and adult patients.
Distance refers to the distance patient has been transported on
ECMO. Transit time (h) includes on- and offloading of the patient
and ECMO machine. [MAS meconium aspiration syndrome, pnth
Patient no. Age
Neonates
1
< 1 day
2
3 days
3
1 day
4
3 days
5
19 days
6a
< 1 day
7
1 day
8
1 day
9
< 1 day
10
< 1 day
11
< 1 day
12
14 days
13
< 1 day
14
2 days
15b
< 1 day
Pediatric patients
16
10 years
17b
1 year
Sex
Diagnosis
OI
M
M
M
M
M
F
F
F
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
MAS+pnth
Sepsis
PPHN
PPHN+pnth
CDH
MAS
MAS
CDH
MAS
MAS
CDH
CDH
MAS
CDH
CDH
59
43
85
63
44
117
110
138
140
88
50
57
160
114
135
M
M
Post-trauma
ALL+BMX+viral pneumonia
Post-burn
Aspiration
Hodgkin+BMX+viral pneumonia
P/F
Murray
ratio score
Mode of
transport
to ECMO
center
Total
time on
ECMO
(h)
Outcome
207
4
207
411
585
4
313
585
760
207
800
1,200
313
70
585
5.0
0.8
3.0
4.5
4.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
4.5
2.3
4.0
5.3
1.25
2.0
4.5
Helicopter
Taxi-cab
Helicopter
Taxiplane
Helicopter
Taxi-cab
Helicopter
Helicopter
MD-80
Helicopter
Taxiplane
Hercules
Helicopter
Taxi-cab
Taxiplane
Ground
Ground
Ground
Ground
Helicopter
Helicopter
Helicopter
Helicopter
Helicopter
Ground
Helicopter
Hercules
Helicopter
Ground
Hercules
77
65
22
86
126
107
76
114
78
45
447
122
140
52
109+181
Survived
Survived
Survived
Survived
Died
Survived
Survived
Died
Survived
Survived
Survived
Survived
Died
Survived
Survived
4
70
1.0
1.5
Taxi-cab
Taxi-cab
Ground
187
Survived
Helicopter 122+774 Died
68
40
3
-
36
32
55
4
3
3.5
70
650
4
2.0
4.0
2.0
Taxi-cab
Taxiplane
Taxi-cab
Helicopter 111
Died
Helicopter 18
Survived
Ground
167+1016 Died
50
35
54
54
46
3
4
3.75
3.5
3.75
180
180
70
663
723
6.0
1.0
1.5
3.5
3.5
Helicopter
Helicopter
Taxi-cab
Helicopter
Taxiplane
Ground
Helicopter
Ground
Helicopter
Hercules
52
3.5
70
2.0
Taxi
Helicopter 259
Died
43
50
70
6.0
1,500
1.0
4.0
Taxi-cab
Jet
Hercules
Helicopter
216
Hercules
168
Died
28
3.75
1,400
-
Survived
51
700
4.5
Helicopter 192
Survived
18
19
20b
3 years M
0.4 yearsF
17
M
Adult patients
21
37 years
22
17 years
23
42 years
24
42 years
25b
23 years
26
29
F
F
M
M
F
30 years M
4 years M
14 years F
Sepsis
Post-trauma
Pneumonia
Pneumonia
Pulm embolism
Post-trauma,
septicemia
ALL+aspiration
Wegener
258
66
295
280
350+144
Survived
Survived
Survived
Survived
Survived
The ICU ambulance used for ECMO transports was out of order
on this occasion
b
Patients have had two ECMO runs
transport vehicle, and the weather. The following modes have been
used: Taxi-cab, ground ambulance, helicopter (Sikorsky S-76), regular aircraft (SAS MD-80), taxiplane, and military cargo aircraft
(Hercules) (Table 1).
1646
jet plane (Citation 3), and military cargo aircraft (Hercules) have
been used (Table 1).
The transport vehicle was equipped with an adequate power
supply (220 V, sine curve, 2,000 W in ground ambulance, 1,500 W
in helicopter and aircraft) to support the ECMO machine, including heater and other medical equipment.
The patient was loaded into the ground ambulance or helicopter at the referring hospital and brought directly back to the
ECMO center. When transporting with the military cargo aircraft
the patient was loaded into the ground ambulance which, after
having driven to the airport, entered the aircraft itself (Fig. 2) and
after landing the ambulance brought the patient to the ECMO center. The patient, therefore, had to be on- and offloaded only once.
Patient care
Standard indications for ECMO were used [1]. Initially, all patients
who were to be transported on ECMO were cannulated for venoarterial (v-a) bypass [14], but towards the end of the period, patients who were hemodynamically stable were instead cannulated
for veno-venous (v-v) bypass. V-a cannulation was performed as a
surgical cut-down procedure, while v-v cannulation either was
done with a cut-down procedure or with a percutaneous technique.
As soon as the patient was stable on ECMO, transport back to the
ECMO center was prepared.
The patients were ventilated with a Siemens 300 ventilator on
rest settings during transport and were monitored according to
standard routines [8].
Materials
From January 1996 until December 2000 the ECMO transport
team was launched for ECMO transportation on 36 occasions. On
28 of these 36 occasions the patient (15 neonatal, seven pediatric
and seven adult patients) was cannulated for ECMO at the referring hospital. Twenty-seven of the 28 cannulated patients were
transported to our own center (Table 1, patients 127). One cannu-
lated patient (no. 28) was instead transported to Great Britain due
to a shortage of available ECMO beds.
Two patients (no. 27 and 29) have been transported on ECMO
from our own center. Due to a shortage of personnel, there was a
short period with no ECMO beds available and two patients had
to be transported on ECMO to Denmark and Great Britain, respectively.
In two instances the patient died before the team reached the
referring hospital and on four occasions the patients did not fulfill
ECMO entry criteria and could be transported or managed at the
referring hospital without ECMO.
One patient (no. 27) was thus transported twice, first from the
referring hospital and then after 2 days on ECMO in Stockholm
to Great Britain.
Consequently, a total of 29 patients have been transported on
ECMO on 30 occasions (Table 1). Age, sex, and diagnosis are given in the table. In neonates, oxygenation index, and in older patients, P/F ratio (PaO2/FIO2) and Murray score [15], were among
other parameters evaluated before initiation of ECMO and are
also given in Table 1.
During the same period a total of 91 patients were treated on
ECMO at our center. Twenty additional patients were transported
to us by conventional means for ECMO, but did not fulfill ECMO
criteria and were thus treated with conventional intensive care.
Results
Cannulations at referring hospitals were all uneventful.
Median time between ECMO request from the referring hospital and start of ECMO was 5.5 h (range
412 h), which also included mobilization of the transport team and transport to the referring hospital. Median time from arrival of the ECMO team until the patient was on bypass was 2.2 h (range 1.254.25 h). This
included time for reevaluation of the patient for
ECMO as well as for priming the ECMO circuit and
1647
Discussion
ECMO is an extremely invasive therapy used in critically ill patients with life-threatening respiratory failure.
When patients deteriorate extremely quickly, or are
treated with inhaled nitric oxide, prone position and/or
high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), a situation may arise where it is practically impossible to transport the patient by conventional means. In the authors'
experience, many patients on HFOV do not tolerate
conversion to conventional ventilation. This justifies
the development of transport facilities on ECMO.
Transport on extracorporeal bypass was first described by Cornish [16]. Since then, other centers have
transported neonates [11, 12], pediatric patients [13,
1648
References
1. Zwischenberger JB, Bartlett RH
(2000) ECMO extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in critical care. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, Ann Arbor
2. Anonymous (2001) ECMO Registry of
the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Extracorporeal Life
Support Organization, Ann Arbor
3. Anonymous (1996) UK collaborative
randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK
Collaborative ECMO Trial Group.
Lancet 348: 7582
4. O'Rourke PP, Crone RK, Vacanti JP,
Ware JH, Lillehei CW, Parad RB, Epstein MF (1989) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional
medical therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the
newborn: a prospective randomized
study. Pediatrics 84: 957963
5. Kolla S, Awad SA, Rich PB, Schreiner
RJ, Hirschl RB, Bartlett RH (1997)
Extracorporeal life support for 100
adult patients with severe respiratory
failure. Ann Surg 226: 544566
6. Lewandowski K, Rossaint R, Pappert
D, Gerlach H, Slama KJ, Weidemann
H, Frey DJ, Hoffmann O, Keske U,
Falke KJ (1997) High survival rate in
122 ARDS patients managed according
to a clinical algorithm including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 23: 819835
7. Peek GJ, Killer HM, Sosnowski AW,
Firmin RK (1998) Extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation: potential for
adults and children? Hospital Medicine
59: 304308
8. Lindn V, Palmr K, Reinhard J, Westman R, Ehrn H, Granholm T, Frenckner B (2000) High survival in adult patients with ARDS treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, minimal sedation, and pressure supported
ventilation. Intensive Care Med 26:
16301637
9. Peek GJ (1999) 10th Annual meeting
of the extracorporeal life support organization. Extracorporeal Life Support
Organization, Ann Arbor
10. Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Custer JR,
Younger JG, Hirschl RB (2000) Extracorporeal life support. The University
of Michigan experience. JAMA 283:
904908
11. Cornish JD, Carter JM, Gerstmann
DR, Null DMJ (1991) Extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation as a means of
stabilizing and transporting high risk
neonates. ASAIO Trans 37: 564568
12. Heulitt MJ, Taylor BJ, Faulkner S,
Baker LL, Chipman C, Harrell JH,
VanDevanter SH (1995) Inter-hospital
transport of neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: mobile-ECMO. Pediatrics 95: 562566
13. Rossaint R, Pappert D, Gerlach H, Lewandowski K, Keh D, Falke K (1997)
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for transport of hypoxaemic patients with severe ARDS. Br J Anaesth
78: 241246
14. Bartlett RH (1995) Management of
ECLS in adult respiratory failure. In:
Zwischenberger JB, Bartlett RH (eds)
ECMO Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in critical care. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization,
Ann Arbor, pp 401414
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.