Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM at Affluent Advertising (PVT.) LTD: Instruction For Final Exam
HRM at Affluent Advertising (PVT.) LTD: Instruction For Final Exam
1. All students will bring their own copies of case study during exam.
2. Write your name and registration no. at the top of your copy.
3. No text should be written on your copy except the name and reg. no. If any text found on the
students copy, then paper will be cancelled immediately.
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Established in 1981, Affluent came into existence as a much needed entity for meeting the growing
demand of the countrys business circle for print and electronic media advertising. In addition, it also
served as an entrepreneurial milestone in the career of Iftikhar Arshad, a renowned journalist of the
country.
Affluent was initially based in Karachi but with the passage of time, offices were opened in Lahore,
Peshawar, Quetta and the capital city of Islamabad. Each of these branches was not only registered
independently but also run autonomously by a different family member. Thus, all financial matters of
each branch were independently handled and individual annual reports were published. Clients were
divided on the basis of location, that is, a company based in Lahore was served by the corresponding
branch, and so forth. If the clients were geographically dispersed, the location of its headquarter
determined the serving branch. The profit generated by each branch belonged to the family member
heading that branch.
Structurally, each branch was designed identically, that is, around functional areas such as client
services, creative and copywriting services, graphic designing and printing, media buying, event
management services, business development, ac-counts and administration (see Exhibit 1). The founding
culture of the organization was rigid and encouraged centralization, efficiency, high productivity and
individual responsibility. All company policies were strictly written in black and white and a manual
containing standard operating procedures was given to each new employee.
Affluent usually hired fresh graduates with 1015 years of education, who willingly offered their
services at much lower wages than the industry norms. These employees learned through trial and error,
and eventually replaced the more experienced lot, thus rendering a high retention rate. Those who did not
show any improvement were tested in other departments and only rarely terminated.
With these design attributes, Affluent enjoyed the fastest growth rate for about a decade. Its clientele
became the second biggest in the industry. It also gained a mono-poly in the government sector, with
names of almost all the ministries on its list of permanent clients (see Exhibit 2). In addition, the low
advertising budgets of most local firms also contributed in enhancing the market share of its modestly
priced services. As a result of Affluents success in Pakistans advertisement industry, as well as the
familial ties of all the branch heads with the founding member, all subsequent branches of the company
inherited the same basic design elements.
In 2000, Iftikhar Arshad transferred the leadership of his personally managed Karachi branch to his
son, Intisar Arshad, who had just completed his postgraduate studies in the West. Intisar had recently
earned his second masters degree in business. The Karachi branch thrived under its new leadership with
revenues reaching their record highest in 2002. Its number of employees almost doubled from 100 to 197
within the span of these two years. Soon after, however, the downfall began and the lowest revenues in
Affluents history were reached within a span of three years. This was largely due to more intense
Page - 1
competitive pressure from new entrants (that is, international advertising agencies) who were aggressively
expanding their operations in Pakistan by luring talent away from Pakistani advertising agencies with
offers of more rewarding and professional work environments.
Departmental Intolerance
Affluent Karachi was faced with an implicit tussle and intolerance between three of its principal or line
departments, that is, client services (CS), creative and graphic designing.
Following are some comments by several members of these departments:
The CS people bring incomplete and sometimes misleading information regarding customer demands.
Not surprisingly, then, the advertisement copy that the team prepares tends to come back for revisions
and then the department is blamed for delay in delivery and cost increase.
(Creative Department Head)
We are hardly ever told about the preferred shapes, colors or expected theme of print ads required by
the customers. This is of course the duty of the CS department. But they arent the only culprits. The
creative people also revise their copies twice or thrice. Obviously then our designs need corresponding
changes and new ads require reprinting and re-pasting. But it is not our fault that the costs are rising
up. Why should we then take the blame for somebody else?
(Senior IT Manager, Graphic Design Department)
Customers are never sure initially about what exactly they require. Asking a lot of questions offends
them, sometimes to an extent where they directly tell us that its our job to decide and come up with
appropriate ideas. Another problem is that we arent assigned customers on permanent basis and our
previous knowledge regarding client preferences ends up lost or forgotten.
(Client Services Manager)
On the basis of these interviews, the newly established department forwarded a proposal of structural
change within the organization. According to the proposed structure, each member of the CS, creative and
Page - 2
graphic designing department was assigned the long-term responsibility of dealing with a particular
client. Thus, within each department there was a member responsible for meeting the requirements of,
say, the Ministry of Health. This structural arrangement implicitly tied members of the three departments
into various teams. Each team was to include two members from the creative department and one from
the other two. Furthermore, one member of the creative department was also going to accompany the CS
executive in the initial stages of the new campaigns.
Compensation-based Concerns
At Affluent Advertising, salary distribution was generally unpredictably delayed for 1020 days. This was
a major source of dissatisfaction and complaints, especially for those individuals who were low in
hierarchy and whose salary amount did not grant them the leverage to extend expenditure. Particular
concerns for these employees were frequent embarrassments related to the payment of house rent and
childrens school fee, which even made them willing to switch jobs for the same salary level, only if they
could be paid on time.
At the middle level of employee hierarchy, there also existed a dominant feeling of internal and
external compensation inequity. The star performers believed their efforts were not being rewarded and
that they were consistently being paid less than the average performers on account of joining the
organization later than them. When Intisar was approached by Zaheer, in this regard, his response was the
following:
Thats not the real issue. Actually our competitors approach these inexperienced lads and offer jobs at
exactly twice their present salaries. Naturally, they leave. But why should we disappoint our loyal and
committed workers for this lot of uncommitted opportunists? We should not.
To resolve this dilemma, the HR department designed appraisal systems that built on corresponding job
descriptions. These appraisals included a mix of traits, goals and competencies required for each job
cadre. The exact percentage mix varied a little based on the exact nature of job. For example, business
development and media buying departments had a greater percentage allocated to goal achievement than
Page - 3
the administrative or accounts departments, where a greater percentage was allocated to competencies.
The average percentage allocated to each section was 15 per cent for traits, 35 per cent for goals and 50
per cent for competencies.
Appraisals were to be held on a quarterly basis by the department heads, after which employees were
sent a copy of their evaluations. This was followed by self-evaluations and counter arguments. Finally,
each employee was to meet with the department head, in person, and have a personalized discussion
regarding performance gaps and improvements. Goals for the next quarter were also mutually decided
during this meeting. The appraisals for the top management team and department heads were to be carried
out by Intisar, while HR managers also collected informal or anonymous feedback through their
respective subordinates.
On the basis of individual rankings, a merit-based bonus plan was designed, which was to replace the
existing annual increment system. According to the plan, those reaching a mark of excellence, in the
quarterly appraisal, were to be eligible for a bonus amount equal to 80 per cent of their monthly salaries.
The amount for those making it to good and above average categories of performance was 50 per cent
and 25 per cent of monthly salaries, respectively.
Finally, in light of the newly carved job descriptions and compensation plan, a credential-based
rigorous selection criterion was also devised to replace the earlier patronage-based selection and informal
recruitment through internal sources. The candidates were first interviewed on telephone to check
presence of mind and sharpness. This was a sort of quick elimination round. Those who passed were
called for a written test in which they were given short cases based on an advertising agency. Here, the
candidates were to narrate what they would do if they were in the shoes of the case character. Towards the
end of the test, candidates for the core departments were also asked to design a campaign comprising a
logo, slogan and radio or print advertisements for given client requirements. Those who passed the test
were asked to prepare a 10-minute presentation, within 24 hours, on the campaign they had designed. The
selected candidates were finally called in to discuss their salary package and how they could earn above
industry standards on the basis of their performance.
After finalizing these structural changes, a report was sent to the CEO for approval. It took the HR
department about ten months to prepare the first draft of the proposed report.
GRIEVANCE-VOICING MECHANISM
A lack of grievance mechanism was a largely held gripe in Affluent. Employees expressed a need to voice
their opinions anonymously. When asked for the reason behind this anonymous grievance registration, a
female graphic designer replied:
Several of my colleagues made the mistake of publically raising their concerns, in the past. They were
all terminated within a span of two months on trivial grounds; one simply because she was often seen
with a male colleague at the lunch table. The guy is still here because he hadnt voiced any public
grievance.
To overcome this issue, the HR department arranged several complaint boxes. One was hung in the
lunch room and others at the entrance of each floor.
earned consideration only if it was submitted twenty-four hours in advance. All unavailed leaves could be
encashed at the end of the year. Finally, any late arrival after 9:15 a.m. was counted as absenteeism.
According to the transport and fuel policy, CS executives were allocated a weekly fuel expenditure of
Rs 700. This was regardless of the number of visits made to different clients or the nature of relationships
shared with them. The executives were to maintain a record and minutes of their client visits and justify
the time expended if so desired by the administrative department.
Akin to the transportation disbursements, a fixed chargeable amount of Rs 500 per month was
authorized for the CS executives on account of mobile usage. For employees of all other departments, the
figure was reduced to Rs 200. Any bill amount exceeding this limit was deductible from the salary of the
concerned employee.
Further, a loan policy was introduced which prohibited any loan grant above 200 per cent of the salary
amount. The loan had to be returned, through salary deductions, within a maximum period of 46 months.
Lastly, a second loan could not be applied for before the previous one was cleared.
In addition to the above mentioned recommendations, HR department also drafted a policy statement
for overtime, which recommended monthly payments for all hours spent on the job after 6:00 p.m., if
approved by the employees department head. Finally, a printing policy was also forwarded that restricted
the printing facility to the graphic design, creative, HR and accounts departments only. While the latter
two were granted unlimited access, the creative copywriters were allowed only four text pages of black
and white prints per copy. Similarly, the graphic designers had to suffice with two black and white image
printouts during intermediary stages of advertisement development. A third one was tolerable, but worth
high discouragement from supervisors. Color printouts were allowed for final versions of print
advertisements only.
monetary to free-minute allocation (see Exhibit 6). These newly decided policies were communicated to
the administrative department for implementation.
Intisar and his top management team, that is, the department heads (other than the HR director), also
kept the leverage to terminate any of the employees at any time. The decision, however, was to be
communicated by the HR managers, who had to frame it in the previous performance appraisal held by
them. Often the HR managers were also directed to ask the employee to submit his resignation rather than
directly terminating him. The remaining dues of the leaving employees were not immediately cleared and
a couple of months could pass before final clearance from Affluent. This ensured that they could not blow
whistles or exhibit explicit resistance against the decision.
Lastly, Intisar announced several one-day outdoor trips and dinner ceremonies such as Iftar, Eid
Millan, etc., to control employee turnover and dissatisfaction.
Exhibit 1
Original Structural Configuration at Affluent Advertising (Pvt.) Ltd
Page - 6
Haleeb Ltd
D.G. Cement
Page - 7
Page - 8
Exhibit 4
Individual Evaluation Form
Part A: Personality Traits (15%)
Instructions
Please use the below mentioned rating scale to evaluate the individuals behavioral traits. All traits are from organizational
perspective, especially trustworthiness.
Rating Scale
0
1
2
3
4
Poor
Bare minimum level
Above average
Good
Excellent
Performance Competencies
1. Professional Integrity and Honesty
2. Commitment and Loyalty
3. Resourceful/Helpful/Cooperative
4. Charisma/Personal Aura/Source of
Inspiration and Motivation
5. Neatness/Hygiene/Workplace Condition
Weightage (W %)
2
5
3
3
Rating (R)
Key Goals
Increase revenue from existing
customers
Decrease cost of service
Number of visits to clients
Poor
Bare minimum level
Above average
Good
Excellent
Weightage %
Target
Actual
Achievement
Rating
Weighted
Rating
Page - 9
(Exhibit 4 continued)
Key Goals
Recovery targets for accounts
receivable
Weightage %
10
Target
Actual
Achievement
Rating
Weighted
Rating
15
5
10
Applicable for Media
20
10
5
Applicable for Admin & Finance
15
10
10
Weightage (W%)
Rating
15%
(Exhibit 4 continued)
Page - 10
(Exhibit 4 continued)
Performance Competencies
Weightage (W%)
Rating
15%
10%
10%
Total Rating Points (b) = ________
Overall Rating
099
Below Average
100199
Above Average
200299
Good
300399
Excellent
Remarks
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Signature HR Manager: _________
Page - 11
Exhibit 5
New Loan Policy
To: All Organizational Members
From: Chief Executive Officer
Subject: New Loan Policy
Dear all!
This is to inform you that a new loan policy has been devised by The Company and states as under:
The loan amount requested must be in accordance to the salary structure of the employee and recoverable within 6 months
through deduction from salaries.
No loan amount greater than the sum of two months salary will be approved.
The employees have to present documented evidences of the genuineness of their request. The employees must sign
a contract stating the promised period of return.
A second loan cannot be applied for if any previous loan is unsettled. No more than two
loans can be applied for, per year.
The loan amount does NOT ensure job security.
If an employee resigns/quits or gets terminated after taking a loan, the remaining sum will have to be returned within a
period of one month, failing which he will be subjugated to legal action.
Source: Company documents.
Exhibit 6
New Mobile Usage Policy
To: All Organizational Members
From: Chief Executive Officer
Subject: Revised mobile usage policy
Dear all!
This is to inform you that company has restructured the cell-phone packages and allowed and assigned certain free minutes to
each organizational member, according to their anticipated mobile usage. According to the new policy:
1.
The company will only pay for the line rent and tax charges for each employees mobile usage cost.
2.
Within the free minutes allocated to each employee, he/she will NOT be charged additionally and NO deductions will be
made from salaries.
If an employee exceeds his/her mobile usage limit, s(he) will be responsible for the payment of additional charges, failing
to do so will result in disciplinary action.
3.
PS: Mr Shabbir of Accounts Department has a list of free minutes allocated to members of different departments.
Source: Company documents.
Page - 12