Student

Number:

1001055476

Assignment
Title:

Chrysler-Daimler Speech

Course Code:
Course Title:
Section #:

RSM 2023 - 2015

Strategic Change and
Implementation
1

2
AM

Professor
Name:

3
P
M

Brian Golden

In submitting this work for grading, I confirm:

That the work is original, and due credit is given to
others where appropriate
Acceptance and acknowledgement that assignments
found to be plagiarized in any way will be subject to
sanctions under the Universitys Code of Behaviour
on Academic Matters.
Please pay attention to the course outline for specific
formatting requirements set by instructors.
Assignments are to be submitted using student ID
numbers only; do not include your name. Please note
that assignments that include names or that do not
have the box below checked will not be graded.
Please check the box and record your student
number below to indicate that you have read and
abide by the statements above.

1001055476

Crafting a Vision at Daimler-Chrysler

Chrysler is proud of its ability to provide mode of transport to millions of Americans who
otherwise might not have been able to afford the same. Chrysler doesnt just make cars, or
minivans, or trucks, but it enables the Americans who are parents and want to pick their kids
from school every day, who are small farmers and wish to carry their produce to the farmers
market, and those part time workers who are going to buy their first car with their own limited
salaries. In sum, Chrysler fulfils dreams of an average American. Daimler-Benz on the other hand
is for those who can settle with nothing but the best in class. For our customers (Daimler-Benz),
we dont sell cars we sell commemoration of their achievements in life, symbols of victory. If
the companies are diametrically opposite in what they do, how they do, and whom they serve,
why the management thinks that these two companies are a match in heaven. They can
leverage each others strengths and their combined value would surpass the sum of individuals
to an exponential level. Or, in fact would not be an exaggeration to say that whatever both these
companies have achieved so far could only be preserved and their lead extended only if these
two organizations work together than in isolation. Here are my 3 reasons why I on the behalf of
management thinks so:
1) Common Purpose and sense of community: The skeptics are right suggesting that the
cultures of both the organizations are different, however there is huge sense of purpose in both
the organizations. They wish to serve their core customers high quality products. Both the
organizations are a community in the true sense of the word. We all think that lasting
relationships matter, and we share some basic beliefs: People are the biggest asset of both the
organizations.
2) Timing of the market: Market is going through a consolidation phase. We are in a period of
auto manufacturing which defies all limits and crosses all borders, in which everything works
with everything else, everywhere, all the time. It's a world where solution matter most, where
size makes a difference, and where success will depend upon our ability to align ourselves to
function in a seamless way to answer our customers' every need. Other companies are indeed
driving fundamental changes in customer requirements. Competition is at all-time high, and
buying a vehicle is no more a one-shot offer rather a repeated event. The person who starts with
a Chrysler car, in a few year, dreams to upgrade himself to a segment in which none of Chrysler
car exists. The duration of getting the dream of such a customer fulfilled is getting shorter and
shorter due to rising income levels all over the world. Once Chrysler lose the customer from his
offerings, he lose the customer permanently. And, so does his friends and family. This is a
dangerous preposition for Chrysler as we are noticing the increasing trend of luxury car sales. In
this overtly competitive market, timing is everything. Association with Daimler-Benz would allow
Chrysler to offer a high-end vehicle to its customers with the same promise of quality and access.
3) Complementarity in our products and markets: It is very rare in the history of car
manufacturing that two companies are coming together who are leaders in what they do yet are
competing with different set of competitors in different segments, and different marketplaces.
The uniqueness in our level-playing field would allow us to serve two markets with one vision and
direction, with two set of products that are inherently different in the needs that they serve.
The decision of working together would make this one firm agile and at the same powerful. We
would be able to harness each others strength in their local markets, thereby reducing the cost
of sales and marketing, leveraging economies of scale and scope. Yes, the difference in
compensation structure as well as risk of redundancy are undeniable, but the scope of leveraging
a common synergy and be the market leader far outweighs those risks. Managements job is not
to prevent risk but to build the capability to recover when failures occur. It must be safe to tell
the truth. We must constantly challenge all of our assumptions and search for the flaws that
could destroy our common purpose. We have had a chance to test whether our principles and

practices are transferable, and our findings have informed us that this opportunity is not a choice
but a necessity for both these firms to flourish.
To end myself, I would like to quote Steve Jobs while Pixar run by him was merging with Disney,
which in a way has similar set of challenges and opportunities that we at Chrysler-Daimler face:
If you give a good idea to a mediocre team, they will screw it up; if you give a mediocre idea to a
great team, they will either fix it or throw it away and come up with something that works.

Final Page

Grade:_________