Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Howick Local Board Agenda - April 2015
Howick Local Board Agenda - April 2015
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
David Collings
Adele White
Garry Boles
Katrina Bungard
Jim Donald
Lucy Schwaner
John Spiller
Steve Udy
Bob Wichman
(Quorum 5 members)
Lynda Pearson
Local Board Democracy Advisor
10 April 2015
Contact Telephone: (09) 572 0151
Email: lynda.pearson@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Note:
The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy
unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact
the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.
PAGE
Welcome
Apologies
Declaration of Interest
Confirmation of Minutes
Leave of Absence
Acknowledgements
Petitions
7.1
Deputations
Public Forum
9.1
10
Extraordinary Business
11
Notices of Motion
12
Chair's Report
13
Councillor's Update
11
14
13
15
39
16
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited at
40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
49
53
18
57
19
61
20
67
87
17
21
22
105
23
113
24
119
25
123
26
139
27
Workshop Notes
145
28
Page 3
Welcome
The Chairman will open the meeting and welcome everyone present.
Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making
when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external
interest they might have.
Confirmation of Minutes
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Monday, 9 March 2015, including
the confidential section, as a true and correct record.
Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
Petitions
7.1
Purpose
1.
Providing a petition received from concerned residents regarding gum trees in
Whiteacres Reserve.
Executive Summary
2.
A petition has been received from Robyn Goulding, Neighbourhood Watch
Coordinator for Whiteacres Drive, Sunnyhills regarding the safety of the large gum
trees in the Whiteacres Reserve (copies will be tabled at the meeting).
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Page 5
Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required
to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the
Chairperson of the Howick Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can
be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or
as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to
address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per
item is allowed, following which there may be questions from www members.
9.1
Purpose
1.
Mrs Nicolson wishes to speak during public forum on the subject of Nixon Hall in
respect to the fees and charges.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
10
Thanks Mrs Jody Nicolson, Chairperson, Nixon Hall Committee, for addressing the
board during public forum.
Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as
amended) states:
An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if(a)
(b)
The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the
public,(i)
(ii)
The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a
subsequent meeting.
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as
amended) states:
Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,(a)
(b)
11
(i)
That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local
authority; and
(ii)
Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
Page 7
Item 12
Chair's Report
File No.: CP2015/04157
Purpose
1.
To provide an opportunity for the Chair to update the meeting on projects and issues which
the Board has been involved with since the last meeting.
Executive Summary
2.
An opportunity for the Chair to verbally update the meeting on projects, issues, events, and
progress the board has made since the last meeting.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Chair's Report
Page 9
Item 13
Councillor's Update
File No.: CP2015/04158
Purpose
1.
An opportunity for the Ward Councillors to update the Board on regional matters of interest.
Executive Summary
2.
A period of time (10 minutes) has been set aside for the Ward Councillors to update the
Board on regional matters.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Councillor's Update
Page 11
Item 14
Purpose
1.
Providing an update on transport matters for the information of the Howick Local Board
and a register of transport issues in the Howick Local Board area currently being
addressed by Auckland Transports Elected Member Relationship Manager (South).
Executive Summary
2.
This report covers matters of specific application and interest to the Howick Local Board and
its community; matters of general interest relating to Auckland Transport activities or the
transport sector; and Auckland Transport media releases for the information of the Board
and community.
3.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Receives the report entitled Auckland Transport Update April 2015 and the
attached issues register from Auckland Transports Elected Member Relationship
Manager (South);
b)
Discussion
Howick Items
A1. Local board transport capital fund (LBTCF)
4.
The Howick Local Boards funding allocation under the LBTCF is $871,903 per annum.
5.
The Boards active projects are included in Table 1 below (NB: ROC = rough order of costs;
FEC = firm estimate of cost):
Table 1:
ID#
009
Project Description
Walkway and amenity improvements at
Half Moon Bay (HMB) Marina
$27,000 allocated from 2011/12
Discretionary budget in Aug-13
$36,221 incurred in detailed design
phase as at 31-Dec-14
FEC estimate of $230,000
(construction only)
Progress/Current Status
Firm estimates (for construction only) and detailed
designs were reported to the Boards transport
portfolio meeting on 6-May-14.
Final designs were completed and distributed to the
Boards portfolio holders in Dec-14. AT awaits
direction from the Board on any further action at an
upcoming portfolio meeting.
Page 13
Item 14
Project Description
Burswood Business Area enhancements
FEC estimate reduced to $318,730
$104,000 allocated by Councils
Business Area Planning Unit
$214,730 balance from LBTCF
156
217
272
276
Progress/Current Status
On 9-Sep-13, the Board resolved that engagement
with affected parties and representative groups be
undertaken on the project. This was undertaken
over Sep/Oct-14.
On 10-Nov-14, the Board approved the project for
construction. The bus shelter component of the
proposal was subsequently put on hold and the FEC
estimate reduced accordingly.
AT Procurement has approved the use of the Minor
Roading Works Framework Contract for delivery
even though the work is over $250,000.
The tender should be offered to 3+ pre-approved
contractors to submit prices the week after Easter.
The pricing period will be 1-2 weeks, then two days
for review and award.
Delivery is expected in May/Jun-15.
Adshel will remove the existing single shelter and
install a new double Classic shelter. Adshel agreed
to cover the cost of removing the existing shelter and
installing the new one (and maintaining it) if the
Board met the cost of the new double shelter. The
approximate dimensions of the proposed shelter are
7.6m long and 1.7m deep.
On 8-Dec-14, the Board approved the project for
construction, based on the FEC of $29,000.
It is expected that the shelter will be installed around
mid May-15.
On 10-Feb-14, the Board approved the project to
proceed to detailed design and costing stage based
on the ROC of $165,000.
On 13-Oct-14, the Board approved the project to
proceed with detailed design and costing based on
the revised ROC of $280,000.
Public consultation on the proposal was completed in
March and 39 submissions were received, mostly in
support of the proposal. The submissions were
considered at the Transport Portfolio meeting on 31Mar-15.
Board confirmation to proceed with the completion of
the detailed design and costing phase, in light of the
submissions received, is now sought.
On 14-Jul-14, the Board approved this project to
progress to detailed design and costing stage.
AT was requested to maintain contact with AC Parks
regarding this and other potential projects along the
length of The Parade.
A cross portfolio site walkover was held on 24-Feb15. Options are being assessed with AC Parks prior
to a programmed cross-portfolio Board workshop on
28-Apr-15.
This proposal covers Kerwyn Ave, Andromeda
Crescent, Lorien Place and Arwen Place.
On 14-Jul-14, the Board approved this project to
progress directly to construction based on the ROC.
Installation commenced in March and will be
completed in Apr-15
Page 14
ID#
279
Project Description
Chapel Road pedestrian signals
ROC estimated at $200,000
274
372
396
6.
Progress/Current Status
Proposal is for a signalised pedestrian crossing at
the pedestrian refuge north of Baverstock Road.
On 14-Jul-14, the Board approved this project to
progress to detailed design and costing stage.
Consultation has been completed and no major
changes are required.
Opus is currently working on the detailed design,
including utility service issues. Once the design is
finalised, AT will arrange for a safety audit before
returning to the Board seeking construction approval.
On 8-Sep-14, the Board approved this project to
progress to detailed design and costing stage, based
on the ROC of $136,500.
On 13-Oct-14, the Board approved this project for
construction based on the FEC of $137,400.
Construction is about 80% complete. Completion is
expected by the end of Apr- 15.
On 8-Sep-14, the Board approved construction for a
section of new footpath on The Parade, based on the
ROC of $5,800.
Construction complete. Final cost to be reported.
On 13-Oct-14, the Board allocated up to $2.5m
towards a new ferry facility at HMB, *subject to AT
allocating at least $1m towards the project.
NZTA subsidy approval for approximately 50% of the
proposed $4.3M project is confirmed.
A progress update is included at item A2 below.
The Howick Local Boards transport capital fund to date is summarised below:
$4,359,515
674,471
444,930
Design costs to date and construction estimate for project at detailed design stage
266,221
Rough estimates on projects at detailed design stage (Pigeon Mountain Road metering
780,000
Maximum allocation made towards new Half Moon Bay ferry facility
Funding being transferred from Howick LB 2011/12 discretionary budget
Funding available to allocate (assuming construction approval given to all projects)
2,500,000
+27,000
($279,107)
Notes the agreement to consider the return of the balance of funds of up to $2.5m
previously committed, on a pro rata basis as NZTA has now contributed 50% of the
Half Moon Bay Ferry facility project
Page 15
Item 14
Item 14
c)
Requests Auckland Transport consults further through the Half Moon Bay
Residents &Ratepayers Association to residents who may not have been consulted
regarding the intersection of Prince Regent Drive/Sunderlands and Pigeon
Mountain Roads.
8.
Resolution HW/2015/25 b) is noted and will be discussed with the Howick Local Board in
coming months when detailed designs and estimates for the project are available.
9.
In relation to resolution HW/2015/25 c), Auckland Transport does not propose to consult
further on the safety improvements scheme at the intersection of Pigeon Mountain Road,
Prince Regent Drive and Sunderlands Road as the appropriate process has been followed
and concluded (including consultation with those considered to be immediately impacted by
the proposal).
10.
However, Auckland Transport notes that the Half Moon Bay Residents and Ratepayers
Association recently provided a submission on behalf of its members addressing both the
Howick Local Boards Transport Capital Fund proposal for metering signals on Pigeon
Mountain Road and Auckland Transports upcoming safety improvements at the intersection,
and none of the Associations feedback regarding the proposed intersection improvements is
such that Auckland Transport considers it necessary to amend or halt the project.
13.
The Stage 2 design process for the fixed walkway and associated landside works is
underway with the architects planning to present a draft design for review by Auckland
Transport at the end of April.
14.
15.
On-going engagement with Mana Whenua has confirmed their on-going interest in the
project and their desire to be consulted on matters of cultural significance.
16.
The communications and engagement plan is being finalised and Auckland Transports
intention is to continue the established engagement process and to present the proposal
plans to an open forum similar to that convened during the development of the Half Moon
Bay ferry terminal redevelopment concept plan.
17.
Auckland Transport has engaged a traffic engineering company to provide design support
for the land-side development works to facilitate the bus connection and turnaround area.
18.
Auckland Transports Project Director for Rail/Ferry Improvements is firming up the project
budget required in order to provide visibility to the Howick Local Board on how much of its
up to $2.5m allocation of funds from the Transport Capital Fund will be required for the
project.
19.
Auckland Transport considers that this project offers greatly improved facilities for ferry
passengers alongside an exciting opportunity to ensure the unique and varied history of Half
Moon Bay is seen and celebrated in the best way possible.
Page 16
22.
The AMETI team is currently reviewing and considering feedback received from the latest
consultation round and is working towards finalising technical and specialists reports for the
Notice of Requirement (NoR). The team is also formulating responses to people who
provided feedback.
23.
Work on the NoR and consents for the Panmure to Pakuranga section is on track to be
lodged with Auckland Council at the end of April.
The key reasons for the project are to provide for significant housing growth in the area and
to improve the corridors poor safety record. Safeguarding this route will provide certainty to
both existing and future property owners on what land is required for the upgrade. New
housing areas can then be built knowing where the transport infrastructure to support it will
be.
26.
Auckland Council has advised it will publicly notify the Notice of Requirement in mid-April.
Legislation requires at least 20 working days for submissions. A public hearing will
subsequently be held by independent commissioners to test Auckland Transports proposal.
27.
Auckland Transport is organising two public information days on 17 April (11am to 2pm) and
18 April (10am to 1pm) at Westfield Manukau, so interested people can find out more to
assist with their submissions.
28.
Any member of the public can make submissions on the proposal. Auckland Transport
encourages people to make submissions if they have any concerns about the project or the
assessments carried out.
29.
Auckland Transport has already contacted affected property owners directly about the
project to discuss their land owner rights and the planning process, and has met with the
majority of them.
Page 17
Item 14
33.
Electronic School Zone for Our Lady Star of the Sea School, Orangewood Drive,
Northpark Auckland Transport proposes to install electronic School Zone signs in the
vicinity of this school. These electronic signs which are equipped with alternating flashing
beacons will be installed on the road approaching the school and will operate at the
beginning and end of each school day to increase driver awareness of the school, as well as
reinforce driver expectation of the presence of children. Auckland Transport undertook an
assessment, using criteria set down by the NZTA, to determine the appropriate electronic
signage for this location, which is expected to be installed by July 2015. The proposal is
shown on the plan at Attachment C.
34.
35.
Electronic School Zone for Ormiston Primary School, Helianthus Avenue, Ormiston
Auckland Transport proposes to install electronic School Zone signs in the vicinity of this
school. These electronic signs which are equipped with alternating flashing beacons will be
installed on the road approaching the school and will operate at the beginning and end of
each school day to increase driver awareness of the school, as well as reinforce driver
expectation of the presence of children. Auckland Transport undertook an assessment,
using criteria set down by the NZTA, to determine the appropriate electronic signage for this
location, which is expected to be installed by July 2015. The proposal is shown on the plan
at Attachment E.
Item 14
32.
38.
Figures show that 50% opted for the advanced transport network and 29% supported the
basic transport plan. On the question of funding the transport options, 34% supported
motorway tolls, while 27% favoured a fuel tax and rates rises.
Page 18
The timetable for the variation involves the preparation of a draft proposal by late April,
followed by a public consultation phase during May 2015. Hearings would be planned for
late May/early June.
41.
The move will allow the Harbourmaster team to work more closely alongside Auckland
Transport Operations Centres (ATOC). This will ensure a more integrated approach across
all transport coming into Auckland, as well as better access to transport support functions.
Rail patronage totalled 12,994,815 passenger trips for the 12 months to Feb-2015, an
increase of +1.6% on the 12 months to Jan-15 and +19.5% on the 12 months to Feb-14.
Patronage for Feb-15 was 1,209,882 an increase of 204,509 boardings or +20.3% on Feb14 (normalised to ~ +34.1%). In the financial YTD, rail patronage has grown by +22.1%.
46.
The Northern Express bus service carried 2,732,222 passenger trips for the 12 months to
Feb-15, an increase of +1.1% on the 12 months to Jan-15 and +16.8% on the 12 months to
Feb-14. Northern Express bus service patronage for Feb-15 was 226,656 an increase of
30,117 boardings or +15.3% on Feb-14 (normalised to ~ +19.1%). In the financial YTD,
Northern Express patronage has grown by +20.5%.
47.
Bus services (excluding the Northern Express) carried 56,009,807 passenger trips for the 12
months to Feb-15, an increase of +0.5% on the 12 months to Jan-15 and +7.6% on the 12
months to Feb-14. Bus services excluding Northern Express patronage for Feb-15 was
4,690,676 an increase of 281,939 boardings or +6.4% on Feb-14 (normalised to ~ +6.4%).
Financial YTD bus services excluding Northern Express patronage has grown by +7.6%.
48.
Ferry services carried 5,351,396 passenger trips for the 12 months to Feb-15, an increase of
+1.7% on the 12 months to Jan-15 and +4.0% movement on the 12 months to Feb-14.
Ferry services patronage for Feb-15 was 555,833 an increase of 91,629 boardings or
+19.7% on Feb-14 (normalised to ~ +19.7%). In the financial YTD, ferry patronage has
increased by 7.0%.
Page 19
Item 14
Item 14
Media Items
C1. Independent company to survey Aucklanders on transport
49. A month-long quantitative survey, asking 4,200 Aucklanders for their views on fixing and
funding transport, is being undertaken as part of Auckland Councils 10-year budget
consultation.
50.
The survey results will be considered, along with feedback collected on Councils 10-year
budget, by elected members before they make decisions on what goes into the final budget
in June. The survey results will be made public by May.
Significant growth has been recorded on both the Onehunga and Eastern Lines, which now
run only electric trains. Stations which have had major investment are also recording big
patronage growth, including passenger numbers having doubled at Panmure in the past
year.
53.
The stand-out performer is Manukau Station where numbers are up 176% for the year. That
increase ties in with the completion of the MIT campus and an increase in the number of
services before Christmas.
54.
Rail patronage on weekends has also increased significantly, which can be attributed to
increased rail services and fewer weekend rail network closures.
Auckland Transport has released a Request for Proposal (RFP) from car share operators to
create a scheme here. It would initially have 250 300 vehicles which Auckland Transport
will match with a similar number of car parks dedicated to care share vehicles. Its expected
that, in time, the fleet would increase to at least 500 cars.
57.
A new large-scale scheme in Auckland would be a private venture with all significant costs
borne by the operator, not by Auckland ratepayers. Auckland Transports main contribution
would be to designate dedicated car parks around the city.
58.
Car share schemes are based on members who pay a membership fee which entitles them
to use a scheme-owned car on demand, for which they pay a per-trip charge based upon the
time used.
59.
There are already about five million people world-wide who are members of a car share
scheme and the numbers of both users and cities with a scheme are growing rapidly,
changing transportation habits in the process.
60.
Auckland already has a commercial car-share operator, called City Hop. There is also a
community-based scheme, called NZ Car Sharing, on Waiheke Island. Auckland Transport
has worked with both, which are relatively small-scale operators, for a number of years and
will continue to do so.
Page 20
62.
Improving the fare structure with integrated fares will allow the introduction of the New
Network which will see more frequent services on key routes at a minimum average of every
15 minutes, 7am to 7pm, seven days a week.
63.
Integrated fares, the introduction of the AT HOP card, electric trains, the first step towards
the construction of the City Rail Link and an investigation of the benefits of light rail are all
initiatives designed to give Aucklanders choices.
64.
The changes to public transport fares through the 2015 review include:
Small increases of 5-10 cents for stage one and two trips for those using the AT HOP
card
No increases on longer AT HOP trips on buses and trains, other than for stage five
journeys which receive a tertiary concession
Stage six and seven child fares using AT HOP reduce
Some cash fares will increase by 50 cents to further encourage passengers to switch to
using AT HOP to receive fare discounts
Tertiary and child concession fares will now be available on the InnerLink bus service
There will also be some changes to pricing for the CityLink bus service now that an
earlier subsidy has ended.
65.
On average, fares contribute 47% to the total cost of providing public transport services
the remainder is provided through government (NZTA) contributions and rates subsidies.
The Civic car park has also been fitted out with more motorcycle and scooter parking and
Victoria Street carpark will be developed in the near future.
Each station, new ones at Aotea and Karangahape and a redeveloped Mt Eden, has been
designed in partnership with Mana whenua, who shared their considerable knowledge of the
local areas to provide a unique look and feel.
71.
Visitors to the design showcase in mid-April will also find out how the first stage of
construction will roll out later this year.
72.
Page 21
Item 14
Item 14
There was wide interest from the New Zealand construction industry and Auckland
Transport has appointed two Joint Venture contractors for the work; Downer NZ and
Soletanche Bachy JV and Connectus (McConnell Dowell and Hawkins JV) for the first phase
of design at a cost of about $3 million. The next phase will provide for a negotiated contract
to construct the CRL.
75.
The Downer lead joint venture has been chosen to progress the CRL work through and
under Britomart Station and Queen Street to the Downtown Shopping Centre site with
construction likely to start in early 2016.
76.
77.
The Connectus Consortium will construct the cut and cover tunnels under and along Albert
Street from Customs Street to Wyndham Street. The work is likely to start in October with
the relocation of a major stormwater line in Albert Street between Swanson and Wellesley
Streets.
78.
Once completed, CRL will turn a one way cul-de-sac rail system at Britomart into a two way
through system that will be able to carry 30,000 people an hour, providing an efficient and
reliable transport choice for Aucklanders.
Issues Register
79.
Consideration
Local Board Views
80.
The Howick Local Boards views will be incorporated during consultation on any proposed
schemes.
Implementation Issues
81.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
23
25
Plan of proposed Electronic School Zone for Our Lady Star of the Sea
School, Orangewood Drive, Northpark
27
29
35
37
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 22
Attachment A
Item 14
Page 23
Attachment B
Item 14
Page 25
Attachment C
Item 14
Page 27
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 29
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 30
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 31
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 32
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 33
Attachment D
Item 14
Page 34
Attachment E
Item 14
Page 35
Attachment F
Item 14
Page 37
Attachment F
Item 14
Page 38
Item 15
Purpose
1.
To seek the Local Boards views on the declaration of park land for road purposes under
S114 of the Public Works Act (1981) for the Pakuranga Road section of the AMETI Project,
and appropriate compensation.
Executive Summary
2.
The Auckland-Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) involves a series of projects for
the eastern suburbs aimed at increasing public transport use, walking and cycling, and
unlocking the economic potential of the area by dealing with traffic congestion on key
transport links.
3.
The Howick side of the Panmure-Pakuranga Bridge project includes the construction of a
bus lane and cycle lane along Pakuranga Road.
4.
This part of the AMETI project affects four parks (Kerswill Reserve, 18R Pakuranga Road
Reserve, Kerswill Corner Reserve and 22R Pakuranga Road) and Auckland Transport (AT)
is seeking to declare areas of these parks as road (totaling 2157m) under Section 114 of the
Public Works Act (1981).
5.
To compensate the loss of this park land, AT is offering Auckland Council a section of land
at 24 Pakuranga Road as a place holder until such time as final areas are determined.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Notes the declaration under S114 of the Public Works Act (1981) of the following
sections of park land for roading purposes:
i)
ii) 18R Pakuranga Place Reserve (802m2), Lot 8 DP 44164, NA1801/32 - Auckland
Council pursuant to Section 191 Municipal Corporations.
iii) 20R Pakuranga Road (607m2), Lot 1 DP 60871, NA1844/67 Auckland Council
Freehold land.
iv) 22R Pakuranga Road (500m2), Lot 21 DP 44724, NA5C/221 - This freehold title
is currently held as an esplanade reserve.
b)
Supports the following compensation proposal as a minimum for the park land to be
taken for roading purposes noting that final compensation is subject to further
negotiation. The parks portfolio holder be granted delegation for providing Local
Board input to the full and final compensation on the condition that this may vary in
location or area but should be at least of equal or greater value:
i)
c)
Requests that any and all compensation be redirected back to the Local Board for
investment in open space with the preference, in the first instance, that this be
provided through replacement land area and where this is not possible the provision
of cash compensation.
Page 39
Item 15
Discussion
6.
AT is progressing the AMETI project along Pakuranga Road to improve public transport. The
project will provide separate cycling and bus lanes from the Panmure-Pakuranga Bridge to
the Pakuranga Town Centre. The improvements will connect to, and continue along Lagoon
Drive, to the Panmure roundabout.
7.
Four parks will be affected by this stage of the AMETI project either in full or in part. They
are as follows:
a. 2R Pakuranga Road or Kerswill Reserve (248m2) NA99C/463 which describes
Section 1 Survey Office Plan 66069 (see Attachment A). AT is seeking to declare the
full reserve for roading purposes. The land currently functions as a road and will be
located under the proposed new Panmure-Pakuranga Bridge. AT proposes to retain
the vehicle access under the existing bridge.
b. 18R Pakuranga Road Reserve (802m2), Lot 8 DP 44164, NA1801/32 - Auckland
Council pursuant to Section 191 Municipal Corporations (see Attachment A). AT is
seeking to declare the full reserve for roading purposes to accommodate the
proposed cycle way.
c. 20R Pakuranga Road or Kerswill Corner Reserve (607m2), Lot 1 DP 60871,
NA1844/67 Auckland Council Freehold land (see Attachment B). AT is seeking to
declare the full site for roading purposes to accommodate the proposed cycle way.
d. 22R Pakuranga Road (500m2), Lot 21 DP 44724, NA5C/221 - This is currently held
as an esplanade reserve (see Attachment B). A partial declaration of land for roading
purposes is required in this easement, again to accommodate the proposed
pedestrian walkway and cycle way.
8.
AT has also identified additional land at Ti Rakau Park and in adjacent areas, which may be
required for road for the AMETI works. The design for this section has not progressed
sufficiently to confirm the area of the park land required. AT intends to confirm these
requirements later in 2015 and will seek to acquire these parks at that time.
9.
To compensate for declaring the park land as road, AT has offered a section of land at 24
Pakuranga Road (see Attachment C) as a place holder. The value of this land offered
exceeds the value of the park land to be acquired across both the Panmure Bridge end of
Pakuranga Road and Ti Rakau Park areas of the project. However, AT acknowledges that
the area of land likely to be finally acquired for these works is substantially more than the
area of land currently offered in compensation. AT is offering 24 Pakuranga Road in
compensation with the expectation that the land will be managed as park. AT would ensure
that any buildings and debris are removed and the site reinstated and grassed. The land
offer is subject to confirmation from the AT Board.
10.
The table below provides a summary of the parks likely to be affected by the AMETI project
and their valuations, and the land offered in compensation.
Reserve
Area (m2)
Value
2R Pakuranga Road
248
$35,000
802
$300,000
607
$270,000
500
$35,000
2157
$640,000
$XXX
273
$20,000
554
$50,000
Page 40
2,524
$230,000
1,349
$92,000
Total
7,827
$1,032,000
24 Pakuranga Road
2,735
$1,900,000
Item 15
11.
AT acknowledges that the land offer may not constitute the full and final compensation
option. The final compensation offer will be subject to determination of the total park area
and valuation information.
12.
Should Auckland Council not reach an agreement on suitable land compensation the
compensation may be substituted with payment of the acquired land value.
Consideration
Local Board Views
13.
AT has presented the AMETI park land acquisition requirements at three full board
discussions since mid-2014. AT has worked with the Parks, Sport and Recreation
Department and Board members to:
Identify the park land required for the project works
Discuss issues and options associated with the land required, and
Present the offer of land as compensation for consideration.
14.
The Local Board has expressed a preference for the area of park land taken to be
compensated on a land for land basis where possible. AT has yet to confirm the full
compensation offer and has requested Parks representatives to seek a recommendation
from the Local Board on the interim park acquisition and compensation option.
AT established a regular (monthly) hui with all iwi affected by the AMETI project at the start
of the project. These regular meetings provide an opportunity to consult with iwi on an ongoing basis. AT has identified nine mana whenua groups with interests in the project area
and engages with these groups regularly and has sought MVAs (Maori Values Assessment)
from each in an effort to better understand the association and issues of each group within
the project area.
16.
This consultation has not specifically addressed the park land declaration and compensation
proposals. Further consultation shall be undertaken as part of the NoR process.
Implementation Issues
17.
To declare the park land for road, AT is seeking to implement Section 114 of the Public
Works Act (Declaring Land to be Road). This section requires the signatures of
the body who controls or in whom the land is vested (Auckland Council)
AT as the roading authority (AT Board and AC Property Committee), and
the signature of Minister of Conservation (delegated to the council).
18.
In seeking the approval of Council (in whom the land is vested), AT is seeking support for
the acquisition and compensation proposals from the Local Board. Approval will then be
sought from the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee who have the delegation for the
acquisition and disposal of park land.
Page 41
Item 15
19.
Should the Local Board support the Section 114 (Declare land for Road) and the
compensation option of 24 Pakuranga Road, AT shall undertake public consultation on the
land take in parallel to the consultation required for the NoR process. If the Local Board does
not provide their support, AT shall include the park land required in the NoR process. The
NoR is expected to be lodged in late April 2015.
20.
Finally, it should be noted that should AT declare the park land as road, the land would
remain vested in Auckland Council, but would be managed by AT as road rather than by the
Local Board as park. The land provided by AT in compensation for declaring the park land
as road will be vested as reserve.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
43
45
47
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 42
Attachment A
Item 15
Page 43
Attachment B
Item 15
Page 45
Attachment C
Item 15
Page 47
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited
at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
File No.: CP2015/05155
Purpose
1.
The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Howick Local Board for eight (8) new
roads created by way of subdivision at 40 Hugh Ways, Flat Bush. The development is
known as Donegal Glen Stage 7.
Executive Summary
2.
The legacy Manukau City Council had an existing road naming policy which set out the
requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and
criteria are applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming in the Manukau
area, until a policy is developed for the Auckland Council.
3.
Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names Casheltown
Way, Barnesmore Road, Ballykerrigan Road, Drumbuoy Drive, Creggan
Crescent, Cloghfin Place, Drumfad Road and Mullafin Road were determined to
meet the road naming policy criteria.
4.
James Brown of Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki has been consulted and provided verbal approval to the
applicant to proceed with the names proposed.
5.
New Zealand Post and Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) have been consulted and
have no issues with the road names proposed.
6.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act
1974, considers for approval the road names Casheltown Way, Barnesmore Road,
Ballykerrigan Road, Drumbuoy Drive, Creggan Crescent, Cloghfin Place,
Drumfad Road and Mullafin Road, proposed by the Applicant, for the new roads
created by way of subdivision at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush, noting that these names meet
the relevant road naming criteria.
Comments
Background
Applicant:
Site Address:
Councils Reference:
7.
The legacy Manukau City Council Road Naming Policy allowed that where a new road
needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer
shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for Councils
approval.
8.
The residential subdivision will be serviced by new roads that come off Hughs Way. In this
case, road name approval is being sought for the new roads within the subdivision (Roads 1
- 8).
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
Page 49
Item 16
Item 16
9.
The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the eight (8) new
roads created as part of the residential development at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush.
Road Number
Road 1
Casheltown Way
Road 2
Barnesmore Road
Road 3
Ballykerrigan Road
Road 4
Drumbuoy Drive
Road 5
Creggan Crescent
Road 6
Mullafin Road
Road 7
Cloghfin Place
Road 8
Drumfad Road
Figure 1 - Location of the new roads (Roads 1 8) for the subdivision at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush.
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
Page 50
10.
These road names were submitted as part of this development reflect on the following:
Greerton Holdings Limited/Hugh Green Limited is wholly owned subsidiaries of Hugh Green
Group. Hugh Green, the director and chairman of Hugh Green Group, originated from
Donegal in northwest Ireland and arrived in Auckland in 1953. The company was involved in
many land developments in the Flat Bush area including the Donegal Glen Stages 1 to 6 at
89 Flat Bush School Road, which was completed in 2014.
The road names proposed were derived from places and towns from County Donegal in
northwest Ireland where Mr. Green originated. This is a common theme adopted by the
Applicant and is consistently used on roads named in their previous land developments
within the Flat Bush area.
Decision Making
11.
The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022),
allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the
Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
12.
The Applicants proposed road names have been assessed against the following criteria set
out in the legacy Manukau City Council road naming policy;
There is a Ballydonegan Rise within the East Tamaki area that is considered to be similar
to Ballykerrigan Road. However, Land Information New Zealand has noted that the
proposed name, Ballykerrigan is unique and acceptable but have recommended that the
applicant avoid using the road suffix Rise to avoid confusion. All of the proposed road
names are consistent with the legacy road naming policy. Furthermore, the names proposed
as part of this subdivision has appropriate association with other names in the area.
14.
As the preferred road names of the Applicant (Casheltown Way, Barnesmore Road,
Ballykerrigan Road, Drumbuoy Drive, Creggan Crescent, Cloghfin Place, Drumfad
Road and Mullafin Road) meets the criteria of the road naming policy, it is considered
appropriate that these names are recommended for approval to the Local Board.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
15.
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report does not trigger any
significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
Page 51
Item 16
Item 16
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board on this report does not adversely affect
Maori communities as the naming of roads is not linked to one of Councils strategic
priorities for Maori.
17.
Despite the above, the Applicant has initiated consultation with the local iwi to provide them
with the opportunity to comment on the proposed road names and offer alternative road
names to be put forward for approval if they wish to do so.
Consultation
18.
The Applicant undertook consultation with Ngai Tai ki Tamaki as mana whenua of the area.
Jame Brown of Ngai Tai ki Tamaki have indicated their support and endorsement for all of
the proposed road names. Mr. James Brown has also noted that he wishes to be consulted
for the naming of the reserves created as part of this residential subdivision. These reserves
will be named at a later stage.
19.
New Zealand Post and Land Information New Zealand have been consulted and indicated
that there are no postal issues with the proposed names Casheltown Way, Barnesmore
Road, Ballykerrigan Road, Drumbuoy Drive, Creggan Crescent, Cloghfin
Place, Drumfad Road and Mullafin Road.
The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road names and any installation of
road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Councils Administrative Charges.
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report is not considered to have
any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
22.
The Southern Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road
name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road
name.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Hugh Green Limited at 40 Hughs Way, Flat Bush
Page 52
Item 17
Purpose
1.
The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Howick Local Board, for six new road
names for seven roads created by way of subdivision at 431 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush.
Executive Summary
2.
The legacy Manukau City Council had an existing road naming policy which set out the
requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and
criteria are applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming in the Manukau
area, until a policy is developed for the Auckland Council.
3.
Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names Peihinga Road,
Valderama Drive, Hangahai Road, Tinaku Road, Ngaki Street and Tipu Road
were determined to meet the road naming policy criteria.
4.
Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki was consulted and did not oppose the suggestions and did not indicate a
preference or supply suggestions.
5.
The names Peihinga Road, Valderama Drive, Hangahai Road, Tinaku Road, Ngaki
Street and Tipu Road proposed by the Applicant, are recommended for approval to the
Local Board.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act
1974, considers for approval of the road names Peihinga Road, Valderama Drive,
Hangahai Road, Tinaku Road, Ngaki Street and Tipu Road proposed by the
Applicant, for the new roads created by way of subdivision at 431 Ormiston Road, Flat
Bush, noting that these names meet the relevant road naming criteria.
Comments
Background
Applicant:
Site Address:
Councils Reference:
6.
The legacy Manukau City Council Road Naming Policy allowed that where a new road
needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer
shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for Councils
approval.
7.
The residential subdivision will be serviced by new roads that come off Ormiston Road, Flat
Bush. The development will require the creation of seven new roads to be vested in Council.
In this case, road name approval is being sought for the seven new roads within the
subdivision (Roads 1/3, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7).
8.
The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the new roads created
as part of the development at 431 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush.
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Greenland Investments Limited at 431 Ormiston
Road, Flat Bush
Page 53
Item 17
Road Number
Road Meanings
Road 1/ 3
Road 2
Road 4
Road 5
Road 6
Road 7
Figure 1 - Location of the new roads for the subdivision at 431 Ormiston Road, Flat Bush
9.
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Greenland Investments Limited at 431 Ormiston
Road, Flat Bush
Page 54
10.
The proposed suffix of Drive for Road 2 is considered appropriate as the new road will
extend the existing Valderama Drive. The proposed suffix of Road and Street for Roads
1/3, 4, 5 & 7, and Street 6 is considered appropriate as these suffixes can generally be
applied to most names as per the Manukau City Council Road Naming Policy.
Decision Making
11.
The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022),
allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the
Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
12.
The Applicants proposed road names have been assessed against the following criteria set
out in the legacy Manukau City Council road naming policy;
All six of the proposed road names are consistent with the legacy road naming policy.
14.
It is considered that the first alternative names for Roads 1/3 (Revolution Road), 4
(Hurihanga Road), 5 (Goldpot Road), 6 (Wheatland Road) & 7 (Cerulean Road) are
appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming policy.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
15.
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report does not trigger any
significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board on this report does not adversely affect
Maori communities as the naming of roads is not linked to one of Councils strategic
priorities for Maori.
17.
Despite the above, the Applicant has initiated consultation with the local iwi to provide them
with the opportunity to comment on the proposed road names and offer alternative road
names to be put forward for approval if they wish to do so.
Consultation
18.
The Applicant undertook consultation with Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki as mana whenua of the area.
Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki did not oppose the suggestions and did not indicate a preference or
supply suggestions.
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Greenland Investments Limited at 431 Ormiston
Road, Flat Bush
Page 55
Item 17
Item 17
19.
New Zealand Post has been consulted and indicated that there were no issues with the road
names proposed.
The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road names and any installation of
road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Councils Administrative Charges.
The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report is not considered to have
any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
22.
The Southern Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road
name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road
names.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
New Road Names Approval for the subdivision by Greenland Investments Limited at 431 Ormiston
Road, Flat Bush
Page 56
Item 18
Purpose
1.
To request that the Howick Local Board approve a proposal from Local and Sports Parks
South to allocate 2014-15 LTP funding for the Renewal of the Eastern Beach southern toilet
block.
Executive summary
2.
The local board has completed minor works at Tiraumea Drive reserve to upgrade the
facilities making use of the open space between the existing male and female toilet areas as
part of the 2014-15 LTP renewal programme.
3.
Park Advisors review of the current 2014-15 LTP Renewal programme, recommends that
the remaining Local Park Public Convenience renewal funding be provided for a renewal of
the Eastern Beach southern toilet block.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board approves the proposal to allocate all remaining funding from
Local Parks South 2014-15 LTP Renewal Public Convenience funding for the full renewal
of the Eastern Beach southern toilet block. Project value $250,000.
Comments
4.
Howick Local Board has completed minor works at upgrading the facilities at Tiraumea Drive
reserve to make use of the open space between the existing male and female toilet areas as
part of the 2014-15 LTP Capex programme.
5.
Community lease staff is currently creating a lease for Pakuranga Outrigger Canoe Club to
use this space as storage.
6.
The Eastern Beach is the most popular beach within the Howick ward. The Eastern Beach
southern toilet block was built in the mid 1970s. The building has two toilets (one fully
accessible), two sinks and a changing room on the female side and one fully accessible
toilet, a urinal, one sink and changing rooms on the mens side.
7.
Due to the normal high summer usage of this toilet block council has provided an additional
four portaloos, which is not ideal situation for such a high profile beach.
8.
These older styled toilet blocks have low safety levels due to their layout and lack of public
surveillance. Their materials make them more susceptible to vandalism leading to high
operational costs.
9.
Crime prevention Through Environmental Design principles state toilets should ensure good
visibility, with toilet doors opening directly onto public space and planting kept low
10.
The renewal of the Eastern Beach southern toilet block would be completed this financial
year during winter, using the available funding from Local Parks South 2014-15 LTP Capex
Public Convenience renewals. A toilet renewal budget of $250,000 which includes the
demolition of the existing toilet block.
Page 57
Item 18
Deferred to Y15
and Y16
Budget
2014
$21,682
$220,318
$74,787
$316,787
$220,318
$183,235
$403,553
$123,235
$280,318
$280,318
2015
2015
reprioritization
2015 program
details
$17,000
$263,318
11.
The proposed toilet block would have four bays [one being fully accessible] and external
shower(s).
12.
There are no known risks with this proposed change but this project will require consenting.
13.
This project would complement one of the aspirations in the Local Board Plan to ensure
Parks and recreational facilities are well maintained and have fit for purpose infrastructure.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
14.
This report sets out a decision for the Howick Local Board to make in order to complete all
Local and Sports Parks South 2014-15 LTP Capex works within the financial year.
15.
The board consider as a key objective in their local board plan the need to address Parks
and recreational facilities are well maintained and have fit for purpose infrastructure.
This is not a significant decision for Maori. Consultation and engagement with interested
mana whenua has already started.Implementation
17.
There are no known implementation issues to this project, although this project will trigger
building and resource consent.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
59
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 58
Item 18
Attachment A
Exterior
Interior
Page 59
Attachment A
Item 18
Page 60
Item 19
Purpose
1.
The purpose of the report is to present the Howick Community Grants Programme
2015/2016 for adoption.
Executive Summary
2.
The new Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was adopted in December 2014. This
policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grants to groups and
organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3.
The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt their own local grants
programme to be attached to the policy as an appendix.
4.
This report presents the Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2015/2016 for
adoption (see attachment A).
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Comments
5.
The new Community Grants Policy was adopted in December 2014 and implementation will
commence on 1 July 2015.
6.
The policy supports each local board to develop a Community Grants Programme for
2015/2016. This local board grants programme will guide community groups and individuals
when making applications to the local board.
7.
Two workshops were undertaken with the local board in February and March to discuss and
develop the local boards grants programme. The grants programme does not include
budgets as these will continue to be developed, as part of the Long Term Plan process.
8.
a prosperous economy
people are supported to lead and develop projrects and create opportunities for
young people
Page 61
Item 19
ensuring our natural and built environment and coastline are well-managed
grant types which will operate locally, the number of funding rounds and when these will
open and close
quick response will be for a minimum of $250 and a maximum of $2,000 and
operate five times a year
local grants will be for grants over $2000 and operate twice a year
lower priorities include activities or events with less than 50% of the project costs
from other sources
the local board requires recipients of a local grant to report back to the local
board on their project or event.
9.
10.
Key processes to be developed once the local board programmes are adopted include
redevelopment of the website, development of new application forms and comprehensive
advertising of the new local board grants programme.
11.
Once the local board community grants programme has been adopted, the types of grants,
funding rounds, criteria and eligibility with be advertised through an integrated
communication and marketing approach which includes utilising the local board channels.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
12.
The Community Grants Programme has been developed by the local board to set the
direction of their grants programme. This programme can be reviewed on an annual basis.
All grant programmes should respond to Auckland Councils commitment to improving Maori
wellbeing by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Maori.
Implementation
14.
An implementation plan is underway and the local board grants programme will be locally
advertised through the local board and council channels. Targeted advertising and
promotion will be developed for target populations, including migrant and refugee groups,
disability groups, Maori and iwi organisations.
Page 62
No.
Title
Page
65
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 63
Item 19
Attachments
Item 19
Attachment A
Our grants programme will be targeted towards supporting the following outcomes, as outlined in
our local board plan:
An involved and connected community
Howicks future growth is managed effectively
Valuing our cultural diversity
We all treasure and enjoy our environment
Our community is active and healthy
Lower Priorities:
We will also consider applications for other services, projects, events and activities. However,
these may be considered a lower priority.
1) The Howick Local Board has identified the following activities as lower priorities:
Activities or events with less than 50% of the project costs from other sources
Fundraising events or activities, unless the activity or event has a wider community benefit
beyond its primary purpose as a fundraiser.
Howick Community Grants Programme 2015/2016
Page 65
Attachment A
Item 19
In addition to the eligibility criteria outlined the Community Grants Policy, the Howick Local
Board will not fund:
Exclusion One: Gratuity for volunteers eg petrol vouchers
Investment approach
The Howick Local Board has allocated budgets to support the local grants programme as follows:
Quick Response Local Grants
o
Local Grants
Attachment A
Discretionary Grants
Application dates
Grant rounds for 2015/2016 will be as follows
Quick Response Local Grants
[insert year]
Opens
Closes
funding
Decision
Projects to
made
occur after
rounds
Round One
July
August
September
September
Round Two
September
October
November
November
Round Three
January
February
March
March
Round Four
March
April
May
May
Round Five
May
June
July
July
Closes
Decision made
Local Grants
[insert year]
Opens
funding
Projects to
occur after
rounds
Round one
Round two
3 August
11
2015
September
1 April
15 May
October/November November
June/July
August
Accountability measures
The Howick Local Board requires
recipients of a local grant to report back to the local board on their project or event.
Howick Community Grants Programme 2015/2016
Page 66
Purpose
1.
To present the usage and revenue data from community facilities within the local board area
for the period 1 July to 31 December 2014 and to highlight any significant impact of the new
fees and charges that were introduced on 1 July 2014.
2.
Executive Summary
3.
On 25 February 2015, members of the Howick Local Board met at a workshop to consider
the impact of the councils Hire Fee Framework For Hire of Auckland Councils
Community Facilities (the framework), which was introduced on 1 July 2014. Please refer to
Attachment A for the fee schedule for 2014/2015.
4.
The framework was developed over a two-year period from 2012-2014 and was based on
good practice principles. New fees and charges, which would help ensure fairness and
transparency for all users, were to be introduced for all council facilities across the region on
1 July 2014. Some hire fees were rising, either because fees for comparable venues of
similar quality, size and condition are being brought closer together, or to address past
inconsistencies in pricing across the region. As a guide, in finalising the first year of fees
under the new framework, a threshold of no more than a twenty percent increase was
applied to limit the impact of such fee rises on the community.
5.
All local boards adopted the framework although six local boards, including Howick, chose to
vary from the recommended fees and charges, acknowledging that existing hirers that were
on special legacy rates and that some hirers would be facing an increase of more than
twenty percent.
6.
The Howick Local Board area has four council-managed community facilities the
Bucklands and Eastern Beaches War Memorial Hall, Fencible Lounge, Nixon Park
Community Hall and Pakuranga Community Hall
7.
After 1 July, the council received enquiries from 43 of the 46 regular hirers across all four
venues. Apart from several of the smaller-sized groups who hired the Nixon Park
Community Hall, many hirers accepted a priority activity discount offered by the Howick
Local Board or a transition arrangement until the end of September 2014. Seven hirers at
Nixon Park Community Hall cancelled their bookings. For the full list of regular hirers, please
refer to Attachment B.
8.
Of the local boards that accepted the recommended the fees and charges, 12 per cent (on
average) of the regular hirers enquired about the new fees and charges structure. Less than
one per cent (on average) of these regular hirers cancelled their bookings. The greater
number of cancellations in the Howick Local Board area when compared with other local
boards has likely been aggravated by the very low legacy fees and charges for venues in the
Howick area.
9.
For a table of fees and charges per venue for the July to December period, please refer to
the summary in Attachment C. Attachment D shows the number of sessions booked by
activity type.
10.
The table below summarises the combined activity of the four facilities in the Howick Local
Board area for the July to December six-month period. Please note that some figures are
reported as percentage points (pp), while others are shown as a percentage (%). Please
refer to the glossary of terms (Attachment E) for more information on percentage points.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 67
Item 20
Item 20
Visitors
-6,312 (-14%)
Revenue
-$16,168 (-34%)
11.
Overall, utilisation (booked hours divided by 10 available hours per day) has decreased by
10.5 percentage points. In the same six-month period, visitor numbers decreased from
45,286 to 38,978 (-14 per cent). Revenue decreased by $16,168, which is in line with lower
utilisation.
12.
On 1 July a new process was introduced to book the available spaces in most of the councilmanaged community facilities across the region and to record visitor numbers. This has
resulted in more accurate visiting figures for this reporting period, when compared with 2013.
13.
For the 2014/2015 financial year, revenue from community facilities is expected to decrease
for the Howick Local Board.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Agrees to adopt the 2014/2015 community facilities hire fees, uninflated, for the
2015/2016 year, as per Attachment A and will apply to all new hirers using the
facilities.
b)
c)
Requests council staff communicate with the groups in transition to confirm the new
rates and that the 2015/2016 year will be the final year for transitional arrangements.
d)
Requests council staff to provide regular updates on the impact of the hire fees and
the performance of council-managed community facilities as part of the quarterly
reports.
Comments
14.
The councils Hire Fee Framework For Hire of Auckland Councils Community Facilities
(the framework) was developed over a two-year period from 2012-2014 and acknowledged
that access to safe, affordable places for people to pursue their interests provides many
benefits to the wider community The framework included these good practice principles:
public management, lawfulness, accountable, transparent (openness), value for money,
integrity and fairness.
15.
All local boards adopted the framework although six local boards, including Howick, chose to
vary from the recommended fees and charges. (Resolution number HW/2014/36 in April
2014).
16.
When the new framework was implemented, it became clear that across some local boards
there were a large number of exceptions to the published hire rates that had not been
recorded in the past or visible to the organisation. The experience of the local boards that
accepted the recommended fees and charges is averaged as follows:
12 per cent of regular hirers enquired about the new fees and charges.
Those facing significant price increases were allowed transition rates until the end of
September 2014.
Less than one per cent of these regular hirers cancelled their bookings.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 68
17.
Members of the Howick Local Board met for a workshop on 25 February 2015 to consider
the impact of the new fees and charges introduced on 1 July 2014. It was the view of some
members that the board continues to provide subsidies to regular hirers on legacy
arrangements and to increase those rates by 10 per cent for the 2015/2016 year. Please
refer to Attachment A for the fee schedule for new hirers in 2014/2015 and Attachment F for
hirers on legacy rates.
18.
19.
The greater number of cancellations in the Howick Local Board area when compared with
other local boards has likely been aggravated by the very low legacy fees and charges for
venues in the Howick area.
20.
21.
22.
Utilisation decreased in all four of the local boards council-managed facilities in the range of
1 to 23 percentage points. The average was a 10.5 percentage point decrease when
compared with the same six-month period last year.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 69
Item 20
Item 20
23.
24.
25.
From 1 July 2014, new processes were introduced to book the available spaces in most of
the council-managed community facilities across the region and also to record visitor
numbers as part of the standard booking process. This has meant that the visiting figures
are more accurate over the six-month period to December 2014, when compared with the
same period in 2013.
Highlights/exceptions
26.
Utilisation and visits at a facility level are shown on the two graphs below.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 70
Item 20
27.
Nixon Park Hall: Utilisation and visits is notably down. Of the 19 regular hirers, seven
cancelled their bookings in response to the changes. They were all contacted and advised
that the local board had reverted to the hire rates from 2013/2014. However, some were
hesitant to rebook as they believed that their charges will increase in coming years. The
council staff continue to work with groups affected by the changed fees and charges.
28.
Bucklands and Eastern Beaches War Memorial Hall: 55 per cent increase in visitors.
29.
Regular and casual users: The two charts below show the regular and casual users of the
four local board community facilities. Nixon Park Community hall, which is more popular with
smaller groups, has lost a considerable amount of hirers. There has been little change at the
other facilities.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 71
Item 20
30.
Revenue
31.
The local board earned less revenue when compared with the same period last year. This is
in line with the lower utility.
32.
Revenue for the Fencible Lounge has nearly halved compared with the same period last
year. Since there has been little change to the overall number of hirers at this venue, the
lower revenue is likely a result of change in customer type to those paying a lower rate or
the hirers booking for a shorter time.
In summary
33.
A new framework for fees and charges was introduced for council facilities across the region
on 1 July 2014. All local boards adopted the framework although six local boards, including
Howick, chose to vary from the recommended fees and charges.
34.
Of the local boards that accepted the recommended the fees and charges, 12 per cent (on
average) of the regular hirers enquired about the new fees and charges structure. Less than
one per cent of these regular hirers (on average) cancelled their bookings.
35.
There were a greater number of cancellations in the Howick Local Board area when
compared with other local boards. This has likely been aggravated by the incredibly low
legacy rates in the Howick and Pakuranga area.
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 72
36.
The table below summarises the combined activity of all of the Howick Local Board venues
for the July to December six-month period. Overall, utilisation has decreased by 10.5
percentage points. Over the same period, visitor numbers decreased from 45,286 to 38,978
(-14 per cent). Revenue decreased by $16,168, which is in line with lower utilisation
Utilisation
-10.5 (pp)
Visitors
-6,312 (-14%)
Revenue
-$16,168 (-34%)
37.
On 1 July a new process was introduced to book the available spaces in most of the councilmanaged community facilities across the region and to record visitor numbers. This has
resulted in more accurate visiting figures for this reporting period, when compared with 2013.
38.
For the 2014/2015 financial year, revenue from community facilities is expected to decrease
for the Howick Local Board.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
39.
The impact of the new community facilities fees and charges introduced on 1 July 2014 was
work shopped with members of the Howick Local Board on 25 February 2015. It was the
view of some members that the board continues to provide subsidies to regular hirers on
legacy arrangements and to increase those rates by 10 per cent for the 2015/2016 year.
Please refer to Attachment F.
40.
The recommendations within this report fall within the Howick Local Boards authority
relating to local recreation, sport and community facilities.
The fees and charges framework is not specifically targeted for Maori populations. However,
it aims to be clear and transparent to all users, including Maori.
Implementation
42.
The recommendations in this report do not trigger the Auckland Council Significance Policy.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
75
77
79
Activity type
81
83
85
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 73
Item 20
Facility Category
Facility Name
Bucklands and Eastern
Beaches War Memorial
Hall
Fencible Lounge
Nixon Park Community
Hall
Pakuranga Community
Hall
Room
Hourly rate
as of 1 July 2014
Off-Peak
Peak Standard
Standard
Main Hall
Main Hall
$
$
44.00
44.00
$
$
35.20
35.20
Main Hall
44.00
35.20
Main Hall
44.00
35.20
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 75
Attachment A
Item 20
Item 20
Attachment B
Fencible Lounge
The Performance Net Limited
Samoan Assembly of God Chuch Manukau Central
Howick Spinners
Howick Orchid Society Inc
U3A Howick History Group
Howick Art Group Inc
Fitness League
Yoga 4 You
Yoga
Howick Toastmasters
Gentle Exercise for Elderly
Nixon Park
Howick Combined Probus Club
Fencible Quilters of Howick
Lions Club of Howick Inc
Howick and Districts Cardiac Club Inc
Satya Sai Service Organisation
Stitch n Fun
Rainbow Ringers Inc
Scrapbooking 1
Fat Quarter Quilters
Friday Quilting Friends
Sunday Quilting Friends
Scrapbooking 2
The Friendship Force of Howick Inc
Auckland Vintage Jazz Society Inc
Pakuranga Community Hall
East City Japanese Playgroup
Church of the Risen Lord Jesus Christ
Social Dance Group
Auckland Mulan Boxing Association Inc
East Auckalnd Table Tennis Club
Pakuranga Indoor Bowling Club
Special Olympics Howick
Australasian Toyakwai Karate Association (ATKA)
Pakuranga Highway Playgroup
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 77
Attachment C
Item 20
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 79
Attachment D
Item 20
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 81
Howick Local Board community facilities fees and charges July to December
B
Term
Bookings
Casual hirer
Hirer
Off peak
Peak
Peak utilisation
P
Percentage points
Regular hirer
R
Revenue
Utilisation
Visits
Definition
Number of slots/sessions booked by a hirer
Group or individual who has made 5 or less bookings across
the network of community facilities managed by CDAC per
year.
Note:
This definition is for this this analysis only, and may not
conform with other business use of the term.
The entity who is party to the rental contract. A contract may
relate to more than one booking.
According to the 2014/2015 fees and charges schedule.
Discount rates applied
According to the 2014/2015 fees and charges schedule.
Discount not usually applied.
Booked hours during peak times / Total available peak
hours.
A percentage point (pp) represents the difference between
two percentages on a 100 per cent scale. It is used for
measures like utilisation so the changes can be put into the
right context. For example, if utilisation increased from thirty
per cent to forty per cent that could be stated in error as a 25
per cent increase. To put it in the right context means it
would be a ten percentage point increase. Volume-based
increases or decreases (e.g. visitor numbers or revenue) are
reported as percentages.
An entity that has made six or more bookings across the
network of community facilities managed by CDAC.
Note:
This definition is for this analysis only and may not conform
with other business use of the term.
Refers to revenue as reported in the financial accounts.
(Not what is reported as revenue for management
accounting purposes i.e. in the omnibus reports)
Booked hours divided by 10 available hours per day.
Note: All comparison reporting in utilisation is presented as
percentage point movements.
Number of people attending a bookable space at a
Community Centre or Venue for Hire in any one session.
Note:
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 83
Attachment E
Item 20
Attachment F
Item 20
Howick Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014
Page 85
Item 21
Purpose
1.
Executive Summary
2.
The Auckland Kindergarten Association (the Association) was incorporated under the
Charitable Trusts Act 1957 on 28 February 1911. The Associations stated objectives are:
providing facilities for and undertaking early childhood education and care
promoting and encouraging early childhood education and care within New Zealand
3.
The Association has 39 community leases with Auckland Council where the Association
owns the building. These individual community leases have varying terms and conditions,
commencement and end dates. A community lease for multiple premises would align the 39
community leases with the same terms and conditions, commencement and end dates. The
benefits to Auckland Council and the Association are:
Consistency of management of the leases with the same terms and conditions
One report per annum on community outcomes
Streamlined management of the next right of renewal process
Enable a move from an operational relationship to a more strategic focus
4.
The Auckland Kindergarten Association Schedule of Premises and Site Plans (Attachment
A) lists the 39 premises separated into local board areas. Each local board is asked to
approve the new community leases for the premises from their area and for which site plans
are included.
5.
The activity of the Association is of a local purpose nature rather than recreation. There are
three of the 39 sites where the land is not classified as local purpose as set out in
Attachment A. The affected boards are asked to approve a lease under Section 73(3) of the
Reserves Act 1977. Prior to granting the lease, public advertising of Councils intention is
required under Section 73(4) of the Reserves Act 1977 and approval from the Minister of
Conservation or their delegate if required. Iwi consultation pursuant to Section 4 of the
Conservation Act 1987 is required on two sites where they are not contemplated in a
Reserve Management Plan. Council staff will consider and work through a process if
required to reclassify the kindergartens lease area from recreation reserve to local purpose
(community buildings) reserve in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977.
6.
There are four of the 39 premises where the land the kindergarten is sited on is an
unclassified recreation reserve. The affected boards are asked to support the classification
of the reserves as set out in Attachment A as local purpose (community buildings) reserve
pursuant to Section 16 (2A) and Section 14 of the Reserves Act 1977, and recommend
approval by the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee.
7.
This report recommends the granting of a new community lease for multiple premises to
Auckland Kindergarten Association for 10 years commencing 1 April 2015 with one 10-year
right of renewal. This is the recommended term in the Auckland Council Community
Occupancy Guidelines July 2012 where the group owns the building.
Page 87
Item 21
8.
A Community Outcomes Plan will be an attachment to the lease and reported on by the
Association (Attachment B).
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Approves the surrender of all current and expired Auckland Kindergarten Association
leases from their local board area as specified in the Auckland Kindergarten
Association Schedule of Premises and Site Plans (Attachment A) subject to the
granting of a new community lease;
b)
c)
d)
i)
Term 10 years commencing 1 April 2015 with one 10-year right of renewal;
ii)
iii)
iv)
All other terms and conditions in accordance with the Auckland Council
Community Occupancy Guidelines July 2012.
Approves the granting of the lease for Pakuranga Kindergarten located on Reeves
Road Kindy Reserve, 107R Reeves Road, Pakuranga under Section 73 (3) of the
Reserves Act 1977 subject to the further following terms and conditions:
i)
ii)
Council staff will consider and initiate if required a process to reclassify the
lease area of the Pakuranga Kindergarten from recreation reserve to local
purpose (community buildings) reserve in accordance with the Reserves Act
1977;
Comments
9.
The Association has 39 community leases with Auckland Council across the region where
the Association owns the building. These individual community leases have varying terms
and conditions, commencement and end dates which can be complicated to manage for
both parties. The Association approached Auckland Council to find an agreed solution. A
community lease for multiple premises would align the 39 community leases with the same
terms and conditions, commencement and end dates.
10.
A community lease for multiple premises will benefit both Auckland Council and the
Association for the following reasons:
Consistency of management of the leases with the same terms and conditions
One report per annum on community outcomes
Streamlined management of the next right of renewal process
Enable a move from an operational relationship to a more strategic focus
Page 88
11.
This will be the first community lease for multiple premises for Auckland Council. Council
staff can see benefits for other groups with multiple premises.
12.
Auckland Council legal advice recommends that the Association surrender their existing and
expired leases as listed in Attachment A so that when a new community lease is approved it
will commence from 1 April 2015.
13.
Attachment A lists the 39 premises separated into local board areas. Each local board is
asked to approve the new community leases for the premises from their area.
14.
The activity of the Association is of a local purpose nature rather than recreation. There are
three of the 39 sites where the land is not classified as local purpose as set out in
Attachment A. The affected boards are asked to approve a lease under Section 73(3) of the
Reserves Act 1977, required when the established activity does not fit within the present
classification. Prior to granting the lease, public advertising of Councils intention is required
under Section 73(4) of the Reserves Act 1977 and approval from the Minister of
Conservation or their delegate if required. Iwi consultation pursuant to Section 4 of the
Conservation Act 1987 is required on two sites where they are not contemplated in a
Reserve Management Plan.
15.
For the three sites Council staff will consider and work through a process if required to
reclassify the kindergartens lease area from recreation reserve to local purpose (community
buildings) reserve in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977.
16.
Where the land is an unclassified recreation reserve the affected boards are asked to
support the classification of four reserves as set out in Attachment A as a local purpose
(community buildings) reserve pursuant to Section 16 (2A) and Section 14 of the Reserves
Act 1977, and recommends approval by the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee. This
classification will support the activity that is currently being undertaken and Parks staff has
been consulted.
17.
The Association was incorporated under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 on 28 February
1911. The associations objectives are:
providing facilities for and undertaking early childhood education and care within New
Zealand
promoting and encouraging early childhood education and care.
18.
19.
A Community Outcomes Plan as approved will be an attachment to the lease and reported
on annually by the Association.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
20.
The recommendations within this report fall within the Local Boards allocated authority
relating to local, recreation, sport and community facilities.
21.
A portfolio meeting has been held with each local board and they were presented with the
proposal for the lease for multiple premises.
The Association has long standing community leases on the properties. Maori are
benefactors as users of the services and it is considered the granting of a new community
lease for multiple premises will not have any adverse impact for Maori.
Implementation
23.
The recommendations within this report do not trigger the Auckland Council Significance
Policy.
Page 89
Item 21
Item 21
24.
There are no costs to the Local Board for approval of the community lease for multiple
premises and costs for preparation of the lease documents are borne by Auckland Council.
Costs will be incurred and met by Auckland Council for the public notification of those leases
which require it. The initial costs are approximately $1500.00 for placing a public notice in
the print media covering multiple sites. Costs may be incurred in the classification of
unclassified reserves process and these will be covered by Auckland Council.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
91
103
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 90
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 91
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 92
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 93
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 94
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 95
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 96
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 97
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 98
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 99
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 100
Attachment A
Item 21
Page 101
Attachment B
Item 21
Page 103
Attachment B
Item 21
Page 104
Item 22
Purpose
1.
This report informs local boards about the Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Annual
General Meeting (AGM) and conference in Rotorua from Sunday 19 July 2015 to Tuesday
21 July 2015 and invites local boards to nominate a representative to attend as relevant.
Executive Summary
2.
The Local Government New Zealand annual conference and AGM takes place at the
Rotorua Energy Events Centre from Sunday 19 July to Tuesday 21 July 2015.
3.
The AGM takes place on the first day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to 4
official delegates at the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The
Governing Body will consider this at their meeting on 26 March 2015. The 4 official
delegates are likely to be the Mayor as a member of the LGNZ National Council, the Deputy
Mayor as the Mayors alternate for this position, Cr Webster as Chair LGNZ Zone One and a
member of LGNZ National Council, and the Chief Executive.
4.
In addition to the official delegates, local board members are invited to attend. Local boards
should consider the relevance of the conference programme when deciding on attendance,
with the expectation that no board will approve more than one member to attend the
conference.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
nominate a representative to attend the Local Government New Zealand 2015 annual
general meeting and conference from Sunday 19 July 2015 to Tuesday 21 July 2015 on the
basis that the conference programme is relevant to the Local Boards work programme
b)
confirm that conference attendance including travel and accommodation will be paid for in
accordance with the current Auckland Council Elected Member Expense Policy.
Comments
5.
The 2015 LGNZ Conference and AGM are being held in Rotorua. The conference
commences with the AGM and technical tours from 09.30 am on Sunday 19 July 2015 and
concludes at 2.30 pm on Tuesday 21 July 2015.
6.
The theme of this years conference is Leading the Charge for our Communities. The
programme includes:
Stephen Yarwood, former Mayor of Adelaide, will discuss performance and customer
focussed culture - taking your people with you;
David Meates, CEO of Canterbury District Health Board, will present on understanding
what's important to communities and why a strong focus on the customer matters;
Dr Lester Levy, CEO of New Zealand Leadership Institute, will discuss disruptive
governance how do we increase our performance and create a strong link from
strategy to transparent financial performance;
Kevin Roberts, Executive Chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi, on telling our story and
selling the value of our sector;
Page 105
Item 22
8.
Growing NZ's talent and economies strategies to retain and attract skilled migrants;
Local boards connecting with the community;
Engaging with iwi to grow local and regional economies;
Collaboration, culture change and customer focus under the RMA; and
Getting the most from the One Network Roading Classification system.
Local boards should consider the relevance of the programme when deciding on conference
attendance, with the expectation that no board will approve more than one member to attend
the conference.
Annual General Meeting
9.
The AGM takes place on the first day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to
have four delegates to the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The 4
official delegates are likely to be the Mayor (or his nominee), the Deputy Mayor, Councillor
Penny Webster (as Chair of Zone 1) and the Chief Executive (or his nominee).
10.
The Mayor is a member of the LGNZ National Council, the Deputy Mayor is the Mayors
alternate for this position, and Councillor Penny Webster is the Chair of LGNZ Zone One
and a member of LGNZ National Council. The Governing Body will consider an item on
AGM attendance at their meeting on 26 March 2015.
11.
LGNZ request that local board members who wish to attend the AGM, register their intention
prior to the AGM.
Costs
12.
The Local Board Services Department budget will cover the costs of one member per local
board to attend the conference.
13.
Registration fees are $1410.00 (incl GST) before 3 June 2015 and $1510.00 (incl GST) after
that. Full conference registration includes:
Attendance at conference business sessions (Sunday-Tuesday);
Page 106
Item 22
14.
The council hosted tours on Sunday 19 July 2015 are not included in the conference price.
Local board members are welcome to attend these at their own cost.
15.
Additional costs are approximately $150 per night accommodation, plus travel. Local Board
Services will be co-ordinating and booking all registrations and accommodation and
investigating cost effective travel.
Consideration
Local Board Views
16.
The Local Government NZ conference will better inform local boards and thereby support
their decision making for their communities including Maori.
Implementation Issues
18.
There are no implementation issues associated with the recommendations in this report.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
109
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 107
Attachment A
Item 22
Page 109
Attachment A
Item 22
Page 110
Attachment A
Item 22
Page 111
Item 23
Purpose
1.
This report seeks the Howick Local Boards (HLB) endorsement for Auckland Council
Property Limited (ACPL) to recommend for disposal the site at 29 Tiraumea Drive,
Pakuranga.
Executive Summary
2.
3.
The subject property a 718m2 residential site with a standalone dwelling. This site was
acquired in 1968 by the Auckland Regional Authority for motorway purposes and is no
longer required for this purpose.
4.
ACPL commenced the rationalisation process for this property in 2013. Consultation with
council and its CCOs, Iwi authorities and the HLB has now taken place. No accepted
alternative service uses for this site were identified during the rationalisation process. The
HLB has provided informal feedback that it is supportive of the proposed disposal of this site.
5.
A resolution for the sale of the site is required from the Finance and Performance Committee
before any proposed disposal can be progressed.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Comments
6.
ACPL and ACPD work jointly on a comprehensive review of councils property portfolio. One
of the outcomes of the review process is to identify properties in the council portfolio that are
potentially surplus to requirements and that may be suitable to sell. The subject site was
identified as potentially saleable through the review process.
7.
Once a property has been identified as potentially surplus, ACPL engages with council and
its CCOs through an Expression of Interest (EOI) process, to establish whether the property
must be retained for a strategic purpose or is required for a future funded project. Once a
property has been internally cleared of any service requirements, ACPL consults with local
boards, mana whenua, ward councillors and the Independent Maori Statutory Board. All
sale recommendations must be approved by the ACPL Board before it makes a final
recommendation to the Finance and Performance Committee.
8.
The subject property a 718m2, flat, residential site with eastern and southern boundaries to
public reserve. The improvements comprise of a standalone, 1960s, weatherboard and tile
dwelling. It has a 2014 rating valuation of $550,000. The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
zoning is residential.
9.
This site was acquired in 1968 by the Auckland Regional Authority for motorway purposes.
It was subsequently transferred to the Auckland Regional Council, which declared it surplus
in 1991. It was subsequently transmitted to Auckland City Council to manage as part of the
Auckland Regional Roading Designation Fund but the title was not changed. Following the
Auckland Regional Roading Designation Fund being wound up, the site was transferred to
Manukau City Council in 2010, and transferred to Auckland Council in 2011 upon
amalgamation of the legacy councils.
Page 113
11.
The Heritage Unit and the Maori and Strategy Relations team were provided the opportunity
to flag any issues. Neither of these parties raised any relevant issues.
12.
The results of the rationalisation process to date indicate that this property is not required for
current or future service requirements. As such ACPL recommend that this site be sold.
Item 23
10.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
13.
ACPL first engaged with the HLB regarding this property in early 2013. The HLB were
supportive of retaining this site to enhance the adjoining reserve. After this option was
investigated and subsequently not supported by Parks and CPP, ACPL held a further
workshop with the HLB, which verbally acknowledged that it endorsed the proposed disposal
of this sites in principle but wished to pass a formal resolution.
14.
The HLBs resolution will be included in ACPLs report to the Finance & Performance
Committee.
11 iwi authorities were contacted regarding the potential sale of 29 Tiraumea Drive,
Pakuranga. The following feedback was received.
i.
ii.
Te Kawerau--Maki
Te Kawerau--Maki notified general cultural significance in the site. Representatives
initially sought to meet with ACPL but then advised they would work directly with Te
Waka Angamua. ACPL requested to be contacted following the outcome of any such
discussions.
iii.
Ngti Tamaoho
Ngti Tamaoho responded that the Chair would make further inquiries with kaumtua
and reseach personnel. ACPL responded that we can feed any information back into
the process moving forward.
iv.
Te Akitai Waiohua
Te Akitai Waiohua has expressed potential commercial interest in any council owned
properties that may become available for sale.
v.
Page 114
vi.
vii.
Ngti Paoa
Ngti Paoa has expressed potential commercial interest in any council owned
properties that may become available for sale.
viii.
Ngti Whanaunga
No site specific feedback received.
ix.
Ngti Maru
No site specific feedback received.
x.
Ngti Tamater
No site specific feedback received.
xi.
Te Patukirikiri
No site specific feedback received.
Implementation
16.
A resolution for the sale of the site is required from the Finance and Performance Committee
before any proposed disposal can be progressed
17.
This property was advertised for sale in 1992 under section 40, Public Works Act 1981. Due
to this, the property is now exempt from the Public Works Act 1981 offer back requirements.
18.
This property is not one of Councils Strategic Assets to which the Significance Policy would
apply.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
117
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Marian Webb, Team Leader, Portfolio Review, Auckland Council Property Limited
Teresa Turner - Relationship Manager
Page 115
Item 23
Attachment A
Item 23
Page 117
Item 24
Purpose
1.
Executive Summary
2.
The Mayors Proposal for the Long Term Plan 2015-2025 (LTP) includes developing a more
empowered community approach to the work of Auckland Council. The proposed changes
are:
to transition delivery to a more empowered community approach.
to move away from direct delivery (and therefore save overheads) and fund community
groups to deliver more.
for local boards to play a much more active role by allocating more funding through
them.
3.
The purpose of the Empowered Communities Approach (ECA) is to develop a new, more
effective and empowering approach to the way council delivers services and supports
community activities. The ECA will establish a new operating model for the Community
Development and Safety (CDS) unit which will shift its service delivery to have a greater
focus on local and community empowerment, with a view to embedding this way of working
across council departments and council- controlled organisations.
4.
A reduction in the cost to deliver community development over time is expected, starting with
savings in the 2015/2016 financial year.
5.
A political advisory group (PAG) has been established to provide strategic advice and
guidance as staff develop the ECA. Discussion has centred on what empowered
communities look like, and what shifts are required within council to support them. The PAG
meeting in March endorsed the proposed approach. PAG feedback included the importance
of meeting local needs, rather than a one size fits all approach. Two further PAG meetings
will be held on 16 April and 4 May.
6.
An engagement programme with local boards is underway. Key steps in this are:
two chairs and portfolio holder workshops.
individual board workshops in April.
a report to local board business meetings in May/ early June.
The final empowered communities approach and the CDS operational model will be reported
to the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee for endorsement in June 2015, for
implementation in July-December.
7.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
b)
where required by the timing of the existing business meeting, the local board either
delegate, hold an extraordinary meeting or accept a late report so that the board can
provide formal feedback during the period 5 May 3 June.
Page 119
Item 24
Comments
Background
8.
The Mayors Proposal for the Long Term Plan 2015-2025 (LTP) includes developing a more
empowered community approach to the work of Auckland Council. The proposed changes to
the community development function are:
to transition delivery to a more empowered community approach.
to move away from direct delivery (and therefore save overheads) and fund community
groups to deliver more.
for local boards to play a much more active role by allocating more funding through
them.
9.
The purpose of the Empowered Communities Approach (ECA) is to develop a new, more
effective and empowering approach to the way council delivers services and supports
community activities. The ECAP will establish a new operating model for the Community
Development and Safety (CDS) unit which will shift its service delivery to have a greater
focus on local and community empowerment, with a view to embedding this way of working
across the council family.
10.
A reduction in the cost to deliver community development over time is expected, starting with
savings in the 2015/2016 financial year.
11.
A political advisory group (PAG) has been established to provide strategic advice and
guidance as staff develop the empowered communities approach. Discussion has centred
on what empowered communities look like, and what shifts are required within council to
support them.
A Political Advisory Group (PAG) has been established to provide strategic advice and
guidance to staff during the development of the empowered communities approach.
Membership of the PAG includes the Mayor, six local board members (Andrew Baker, Efeso
Collins, Vanessa Neeson, Peter Haynes, Julia Parfitt and Kay McIntyre), five governing body
members (Cathy Casey, Linda Cooper, George Wood, Alf Filipaina, Penny Hulse) and a
representative from the Independent Mori Statutory Board (Karen Wilson).
13.
At their meeting on 6 March 2015 the PAG endorsed the proposed approach. The key
points discussed were:
Empowered Communities: Enabling Council: The approach is underpinned by a twoway relationship between council and the community; leading to improved outcomes for
Auckland.
Describing empowered communities: an empowered community is one where
individuals, whanau and communities have the power and ability to influence decisions,
take action and make change happen in their lives and communities. This includes
communities of place, interest and identity.
How to support community empowerment: community empowerment is about providing
real opportunities for people to participate and fostering the conditions that support this.
An empowered communities approach is a way of working that empowers people to
play a more active role in the decisions that affect their communities.
14.
Working in a way that empowers communities requires whole of council shifts to:
provide a gateway / portal into council resources and information.
provide more support for local boards and other areas of council to work together in
joined-up ways with local communities.
facilitate and embed the empowered communities approach across council.
Page 120
16.
Staff will report back to the PAG on 16 April with the following:
revised approach.
the proposed operating model for the CDS unit.
supporting tools.
budget and implementation implications.
ECA timeline
17.
Stage
Date
Purpose
15-23 April
16 April
20 April
21 April 1 May
4 May
5 May 3 June
Budget Committee
7-8 May
4 June
18.
July - December
For some local boards, the timing of the May-June local board business meetings may
require the local board to either delegate, hold an extraordinary meeting or accept a late
report so that the board can provide formal feedback during the period 5 May 3 June.
Page 121
Item 24
Item 24
Engagement with community stakeholders is ongoing, with initial feedback workshops held
in March across the region. At the workshops, staff explored with participants what
capabilities and ideas for empowering communities, equity issues and activities the
community see themselves as best delivering. Engagement was sought on what is best kept
as council core functions in relation to community development and safety.
20.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
21.
The empowered community approach aims to provide a much more active role for local
boards in community development.
22.
ECA builds on the strong focus on community led planning and development in the Local
Board Plans 2014.
23.
Local boards views will be sought through the process outlined above.
The ECAP has the potential to impact on Mori over time. Engagement with mataawaka and
mana whenua will be undertaken during the engagement phase to enable staff to
understand potential impacts.
25.
A representative from the Independent Mori Statutory Board sits on the PAG.
Implementation
26.
The model will be implemented in CDS in 2015/2016. The approach will be rolled out across
the whole of council over time.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 122
Purpose
1.
This report provides a summary of the feedback received through the Long-term Plan 2015 2025 (LTP) consultation relevant to the Howick area for the local boards consideration to
help inform its advocacy to the Budget Committee and their decision making on locally
driven initiatives (LDI budgets).
Executive Summary
2.
The LTP proposals were released for public consultation in January 2015, with local
engagement and Have Your Say events held through until 16 March to receive feedback.
Feedback was also received through written or online forms, email and through social
media.
3.
In total, the Council received and processed over 27,000 pieces of written feedback of which
1300 were received from the Howick Local Board area. In addition over 40 people attended
a Have Your Say event in the Howick Local Board area on 3 and 5 March 2015.
4.
Attached to this report is a summary of the feedback received through the LTP consultation
on local and regional proposals for the Howick Local Board area. This feedback will help
inform the Howick Local Boards advocacy to the Budget Committee at discussions on 24,
28 and 29 April. These discussions are timed to inform the Budget Committee prior to them
making decisions on the LTP on 7 and 8 May 2015.
5.
The feedback will also assist the Howick Local Board decisions in their decision making
when finalising LDI and advocacy content for their Local Board Agreements 2015/2016.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Receive the summary of feedback from Howick Local Board area consultation report
in attachment A.
b)
Confirms an updated list of advocacy points for the discussions with the Budget
Committee on 24, 28 and 29 April (Attachment B).
Comments
6.
The summary of the feedback received through the Long-term Plan 2015 - 2025 (LTP)
consultation relevant to the Howick Local Board is in Attachment A. It must be noted that
the figures may not necessarily represent informed feedback. This feedback is only one of
many tools to help the local board in their decision-making.
7.
This feedback builds on the local boards understanding of their community priorities and
preferences. It will also inform the local boards advocacy to the Budget Committee at
discussions on 24, 28 and 29 April. At these discussions the board will have the opportunity
to provide feedback on the key consultation issues of investing in Auckland, fixing transport,
sharing rates and housing and development. The board may also provide feedback on
regional proposals with particular impact locally and may advocate for specific local priorities
where the Budget Committee is the decision maker, such as large capital projects.
8.
The updated advocacy points in relation to the LTP are in Attachment B (to be tabled at the
meeting).
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 123
Item 25
Item 25
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
9.
The Howick Local Board needs to consider any changes that it might make to their LDI
budgets or advocacy in light of the feedback on the LTP proposals.
Many local board decisions are of importance to and impact on Maori. The local board
agreements are important tools that enable and can demonstrate the councils
responsiveness to Maori. The local board agreement is based on the local board plan which
are both been developed through engagement with the community, including Maori.
Implementation
11.
Following the local board discussions with the Budget Committee on 24, 28 and 29 April the
Budget Committee will make decisions on regional proposals on 7 and 8 May. Local boards
will then hold workshops from 14 to 20 May to finalise their local board agreements prior to
them being adopted at board meetings between 9 and 16 June.
Attachments
No.
Title
Page
Long Term Plan 2015-2025 consultation feedback report for Howick Local
Board
125
137
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 124
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 125
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 126
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 127
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 128
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 129
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 130
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 131
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 132
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 133
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 134
Attachment A
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 135
Item 25
Local board advocacy and feedback on Long-term Plan 2015 2025 proposals
Page 137
Attachment B
Item 26
Purpose
1.
Providing a list of reports requested and issues pending for the Howick Local Board.
Executive Summary
2.
A list of reports requested and issues pending is updated monthly and presented at the
Board meeting to keep members informed of progress on outstanding reports and issues.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Receives the Reports Requested and Issues Raised 2013 2016 schedule.
Attachments
No.
Title
Issues Register
Page
141
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Page 139
Date of
Meeting
Resolution or
Item No:
Issue
Resolution/Description
Target Date
Progress/Comments
39
16/4/12
HW/2012/68
Encroachment by MacLeans
College on MacLeans Park
a)
b)
c)
d)
71
9/9/13
HW/2013/168
Uxbridge Redevelopment
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
73
9/12/13
HW/2013/208
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
74
9/6/14
HW/2014/69
a)
b)
Page 141
Attachment A
Item
No
Item 26
Item 26
Date of
Meeting
Resolution or
Item No:
Issue
Resolution/Description
75
14/7/14
HW/2014/112
HW/2014/113
Target Date
Progress/Comments
a)
b)
c)
d)
Attachment A
8/9/14
HW/2014/140
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Action sheet sent to Kat Teirney, Tereena Griffiths, Tristan Coulson and
Vanessa Leddra on 10/9/14
Update on progress requested following the resolution on 8 September
business meeting and when provided will be given to the Portfolio team at its
regular meeting
No decisions made by Chair and Portfolio lead to date around setting charges
for any legacy users who are not regular users as per resolution 12 (f).
Local Board Services staff are currently working with the Venues for hire team
to plan and prepare the report which will be presented to the local board in
February 2015. This report will address the issues raised by the local board at
their July and September business meetings, and provide options for fees and
charges for the 2015 / 2016 financial year.
Draft report discussed at Community Facilities Portfolio in February and way
forward agreed. Report likely to come to April BM.
Page 142
Resolution or
Item No:
Issue
Resolution/Description
Target Date
Progress/Comments
Item 26
Item
No
Attachment A
Page 143
Item 27
Workshop Notes
File No.: CP2015/04161
Purpose
1.
This report attaches the workshop notes taken for the period stated below.
Executive Summary
2.
Under Standing Order 1.4.2 and 2.15 workshops convened by the Board shall be closed to
the public, however, the proceedings of a workshop shall record the names of members
attending and a statement summarising the nature of the information received and nature of
matters discussed. No resolutions are passed or decisions reached, but are solely for the
provision of information and discussion. This report attaches the workshop notes for the
period stated below.
Recommendation/s
That the Howick Local Board:
a)
Receives the workshop notes for workshops held on 26th February, 12th, 19th and 26th
March 2015.
Attachments
No.
Title
Workshop Notes
Page
147
Signatories
Authors
Authorisers
Workshop Notes
Page 145
Attachment A
Item 27
Workshop Notes
Page 147
Attachment A
Item 27
Workshop Notes
Page 148
Attachment A
Item 27
Workshop Notes
Page 149
Attachment A
Item 27
Workshop Notes
Page 150
Attachment A
Item 27
Workshop Notes
Page 151