Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Affordance: 2 As Perceived Action Possibilities
Affordance: 2 As Perceived Action Possibilities
Aord redirects here. For the surname, see Aord (sur- fordances as all action possibilities latent in the enviname).
ronment, objectively measurable and independent of the
An aordance is often taken as a relation between individuals ability to recognize them, but always in relation to agents and therefore dependent on their capabilities. For instance, a set of steps which rises four feet
high does not aord the act of climbing if the actor is
a crawling infant. Gibsons is the prevalent denition in
cognitive psychology.
Aordances were further studied by Eleanor J. Gibson,
wife of James Gibson, who created her theory of perceptual learning around this concept. Eleanor Gibsons book,
An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development explores aordances further.
Jakob von Uexkll had already discussed the concept in
the early twentieth century,[9] calling it the functional
tinting (funktionale Tnung) of organisms with respect
to stimuli.[10]
The handles on a tea set provide an obvious aordance for holding for individuals with hands.
Anderson, Yamagishi and Karavia (2002) sought to determine whether visual attention or aordance forms the
basis of the motor signals generated by many everyday
graspable objects. By examining how the properties of
an object aect an observers reaction time for judging its orientation, they provided evidence to indicate
that directed visual attention (not aordance) is responsible for the automatic generation of many motor signals
associated with the spatial characteristics of perceived
Dierent denitions of the term have developed. The
objects.[11]
original denition described all actions that are physically
possible. This was later adapted to describe action possibilities of which an actor is aware. Some dene aordance as a potential resource for some (not a particular)
2 As perceived action possibilities
organism or species of organism, and so while inviting the
possible engagement of some species, not identied with
any particular one.[5][6] The term has further evolved for In 1988, Donald Norman appropriated the term aoruse in the context of humancomputer interaction (HCI) dances in the context of humanmachine interaction to
refer to just those action possibilities that are readily perto indicate the easy discoverability of possible actions.
ceivable by an actor. Through his book The Design of
The word is used in a variety of elds: perceptual
Everyday Things,[12] this interpretation was popularized
psychology, cognitive psychology, environmental psywithin the elds of HCI and interaction design. It makes
chology, industrial design, humancomputer interaction,
the concept dependent not only on the physical capabilinteraction design, instructional design, science, technolities of an actor, but also the actors goals, plans, values,
ogy and society (STS), and articial intelligence.
beliefs, and past experiences. If an actor steps into a
room with an armchair and a softball, Gibsons original
denition of aordances allows that the actor may throw
1 As action possibilities
the chair and sit on the ball, because this is objectively
possible. Normans denition of (perceived) aordances
Psychologist James J. Gibson originally introduced the captures the likelihood that the actor will sit on the armterm in his 1977 article The Theory of Aordances[7] chair and throw the softball. Eectively, Normans aorand explored it more fully in his book The Ecological Ap- dances suggest how an object may be interacted with.
proach to Visual Perception[8] in 1979. He dened af- For example, the size and shape of a softball obviously
an object, or an environment, and an organism that affords the opportunity for that organism to perform an
action.[1][2] For example, a knob aords twisting, and
perhaps pushing, while a cord aords pulling. As a relation, an aordance exhibits the possibility of some action, and is not a property of either an organism or its
environment alone.[3][4]
False aordances
William Gaver[16] divided aordances into three categories: perceptible, hidden, and false.
A false aordance is an apparent aordance that
does not have any real function, meaning that the actor perceives nonexistent possibilities for action.[17]
A good example of a false aordance is a placebo
button.[18]
A hidden aordance indicates that there are possibilities for action, but these are not perceived by the
actor. For example, it is not apparent from looking
at a shoe that it could be used to open a wine bottle.
For an aordance to be perceptible, there is information available such that the actor perceives and
can then act upon the existing aordance.
REFERENCES
Action-specic perception
Form follows function
5 References
[1] Leo van Lier (2004). Relations. e-Study Guide for:
Handbook of Psychology, Volume 6: Developmental Psychology: Psychology, Human development. Springer. p.
4. ISBN 978-1402079047. a relationship between an
organism and the environment that signals an opportunity
for or inhibition of action See also a list of various denitions titled What are aordances, p. 91
[2] Don Norman (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (Revised and expanded ed.). Basic Books. p. 11. ISBN
978-0465050659. An aordance is a relationship between the properties of an object and the capabilities of
the agent that determine just how the object could possibly be used.
[3] Juval Portugali (1996). Inter-representation Networks
and Cognitive Mappings.
In Juval Portugali, ed.
The construction of cognitive maps. Springer. ISBN
9780585334851.
[4] Ulric Neisser (1989). Chapter 1; Introduction: the ecological and intellectual bases of categorization. In Ulric
Neisser, ed. Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge University Press. p. 12. ISBN 9780521378758.
[5] Edward S. Reed (1996). Encountering the World : Toward an Ecological Psychology. Oxford University Press.
p. 40. ISBN 9780195360936. What makes something
an aordance is that it has the right properties to support
some species behavioral processes
[6] For an extended discussion of views on aordances, see
Anthony Chemero (2011). "7.2 Aordances 1.0. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. MIT Press. pp. 136 .
ISBN 9780262258081.
[7] James J. Gibson (1977), The Theory of Aordances. In
Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, edited by Robert Shaw
and John Bransford, ISBN 0-470-99014-7.
[8] James J. Gibson (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, ISBN 0-89859-959-8.
[9] Uexkll, Jakob von (1980 [1920 etc.]), Kompositionslehre der Natur, edited by Thure von Uexkll, Frankfurt am
Main.
See also
Usability
[11] Anderson, S. J.; Yamagishi, N.; Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269 (1497):
1225. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1998.
[12] Donald Norman, The Design of Everyday Things, ISBN
0-465-06710-7. Originally published under the title The
Psychology of Everyday Things, often abbreviated to
POET.
[13] Donald A. Norman (1999). Aordance, Conventions and
Design. Interactions 6(3):38-43, May 1999, ACM Press.
[14] Aordance, Conventions and Design (Part 2)
[15] In HumanComputer Interaction, Preece et al. (1994, p.
6) explicitly dene perceived aordances as being a subset
of all aordances, but the meanings are intermingled later
in the same paragraph by talking about good aordance";
in Universal Principles of Design, Lidwell, Holden & Butler (2003, p. 20) rst explain that round wheels are better
suited for rolling than square ones and therefore better afford (i.e. allow) rolling, but later state that a door handle
aords (i.e. suggests) pulling, but not pushing.
[16] Gaver, William W. (1991). Technology aordances.
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology
- CHI '91. p. 79. doi:10.1145/108844.108856. ISBN
0897913833.
[17] Aordances
[18] Placebo buttons, false aordances and habit-forming
Additional reading
The role of aordances in evolution and niche construction is discussed by Rob Withagen, Margot van
Wermeskerken (2010). The role of aordances in
the evolutionary process considered: A niche construction perspective. Theory and Psychology 20
(4): 489510. doi:10.1177/0959354310361405.
The role of aordances in agency is discussed
by Rob Withagen, Harjo J de Poel, Duarte
Arajo, Gert-Jam Pepping (2012). Aordances
can invite behavior:
Reconsidering the relationship between aordances and agency.
New Ideas in Psychology 30 (2): 250258.
doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003.
Aordance and computation is discussed
Gibsons aorby AJ Wells (2002).
dances and Turings theory of computation. Ecological psychology 14 (3): 140180.
doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1403_3.
7 External links
A series of slides concerning theories of vision and
(incidentally) the role of aordances and some interesting optical illusions concerning aordances
Aaron Sloman (March 12, 2014). Whats vision
for, and how does it work? From Marr (and earlier)
to Gibson and beyond. Retrieved May 22, 2014.
8.1
Text
8.2
Images
8.3
Content license