Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aramco Safety Manaement
Aramco Safety Manaement
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
2.
Introduction............................................................................................................2
1.1
Problem statement..........................................................................................4
1.2
1.3
Methodology..................................................................................................5
1.4
Significance....................................................................................................6
Literature Review...................................................................................................7
2.1
Safety Management........................................................................................7
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.4
3.
3.2
4.
Questionnaire Design...........................................................................................33
5.
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................45
1.
INTRODUCTION
Safety, as a concept and practice, is in transition. It has shifted form what once was little
more than plain-sense approach to eliminating agents of injury to what now is quite often
a complex methodology for the reliable control of harm. Within the boundaries of safetys
emerging abilities exists a capacity for more than simply the detection of causative
relationship and design of practical controls. These have been safety program routines
practically since their inception, and the skills involved have increased with each
succeeding year.
The current shift occurs in the growing awareness of and ability to meet the need for
affecting the wanted controls. This seems to be an ordinary, expected outcome. However,
common experience reminds us that injurious occurrences are repeated despite
knowledge of their causes or the availability of recommended controls. Indeed,
implementation difficulties have been the critical problem for safety control programs.
(Ref 4:17)
Safety is a humanitarian as well as an important issue in development progress. No body
wants to hurt others to be troublemaker however, without rules that govern the miss act or
irresponsibility it is going to be easy for people to commit safety violations. In addition to
the assets value loss resulting from unsafe damage, some of the safety violations are very
serious and may well cause serious unrecoverable consequences.
According to Roth (Ref:1), an effective safety program or safety plan could help allot in
solving, reducing or eliminating these consequences caused by those safety violation.
Unfortunately, safety in often neglected on working sites where getting the work done the
work is the first priority. Safety issues are always discussed in companies meetings but
actually it takes a low priority to schedule and budget discussions.
Safety should be an integral part of the total business activities of an enterprise. This
should be reflected in the overall management instruments for the enterprise and for the
individual sites. Furthermore, safety issues should be addressed as part of the overall
corporate Safety, Health and Environment (Safety) policies, as well as in the
development of safety management systems and safety goals and objectives. In this
regard, management should establish a corporate safety culture that is reflected in the
Safety Policy and ensures all employees are aware of their roles and responsibilities with
respect to safety. The most important factor for achieving a safe workplace is the belief
by all personnel and others involved in the operation that safety is critical. This includes
the intention to act consistently with this belief, and the genuinely safe behavior by all.
Such a result is founded in the safety culture created by management in co-operation with
other employees. (Ref: 18)
The field of industrial safety encompasses a broad range of issues including the safety of
electric power, gas utility, and various forms of heat supply, explosives, high-pressure
gas, LPG, and mines. It is the foremost duty of the administrative authority and their
responsibility for industrial safety with utilizing their experience in these diverse fields,
which play such a critical role in people's everyday lives and industrial activities. They
should improve the industrial safety regulation more effective and efficient as well as to
promote self-imposed safety activities, because of improvement in licensees' and
industries' capabilities and requests for future regulation streamlining and international
conformity of technical standards.
According to Dan Peterson (Ref: 2), he stated that it is only in recent years that most
safety professionals have been able to define their role in safety work that is being
accomplished. What they do have changed and will continue to results can be affect3ed
by dealing with root causes, safety professionals must learn to work well below the
symptomatic level.
If accidents are caused by management safety weakness, safety professionals must learn
to locate and define these weaknesses. They must evolve methods for doing this. This
may or may not lead them to do the things they did in past. Inspection may remain one of
their tools-or it may not. Investigation may be one of their tools or it may not. Certainly
safety professionals must use new tools and modernize old tools, for their direction is
different today, their duties must also be different.
1.1
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The safety programs in any construction contractors dont function efficiently, though
they have their own safety management programs. It needs to have certain evaluation for
the main construction company to evaluate thoroughly the safety programs of their
contracting companies in order to assure safe and healthy completion of the assigned
project. Here the case of Berri Gas Plant of ARAMCO, it needs an assessment tool which
could evaluate different indicators of the contractors safety management program
according to its safety needs.
1.2
The ultimate goal for every enterprise should be to have zero incidents. This goal
provides the incentive to achieve the best possible performance and ensures continuous
vigilance towards greater safety. Seeking to achieve this goal and managing safety
METHODOLOGY
The methodology of this project is on the lines of the objectives stated. The initial part of
the project is done by literature review; in the first part of literature review some
standards measures of any industrial safety management system are discussed. Also the
objectives and challenges for a management system are listed out. The next step is to
discuss the factors affecting contractors safety performance and the indicators in
developing the contractors safety performance; to have a clear idea of the contractors
safety program. Also the accident prevention program is discussed in order to describe
the routine industrial safety prevention program.
The next phase of the project mentions briefly the safety programs and measures under
taken by the ARAMCO Berri gas plant. And then to study the safety programs of the two
contracting companies that build two big projects at BGP namely Ethan recovery plant (F
20 BI 3150), and Qatif Plant ( BI 3022). Based on this study the drawbacks in their safety
programs are found out.
The final stage of the project is to design the questionnaire, while design of the
questionnaire certain safety performance indicators are considered so as to measure
correctly the required task. These indicators will be mentioned clearly in the design
process of the questionnaire. Also the questionnaire design considers the ARAMCO
safety standards.
1.4
SIGNIFICANCE
The output of the project is the questionnaire, which is a measuring device for the client,
here ARAMCO. It can measure the efficiency of the safety program of the contractors
who plea to work on any construction project, so significantly it helps in ensuring safe
and healthy project execution.
2.
LITERATURE REVIEW
This part of project deals with some conceptual and theoretical background of the issues
related to the safety management. Initially we would like to discuss the objective and
duties of a safety management system. Then list out some of the safety management
program adopted at BGP in different sectors, and then in the later part of the project it
would be compared on the basis of a standard safety management program.
2.1
SAFETY MANAGEMENT
All enterprises should have safety management systems, as part of their overall
management of the enterprises (in fact, there is a clear correlation between safely-run
enterprises and well-managed operations). A safety management system provides a
structured approach to those arrangements needed to achieve good safety performance
within an enterprise. It should be based on the Safety Policy. The system should define an
ambition level that the enterprise considers adequate for its business, as well as the safety
concerns and requirements specific to their sites. As a minimum, the requirements of the
legislation and other imperative sources should, under all circumstances, be fulfilled. (Ref
4:36)
2.1.1
A number of factors add difficulty to the safety problem, but none may be more
troublesome than the universal failure to see that the hazard control problem frequently is
quite complex. Safety therefore often is viewed largely as a simple matter of applying
specific routines. In many cases the routines are repeatedly regular despite obvious signs
of their weakness. Greatly needed is an understanding that the sources of harm, which the
safety specialty should be able to control, have basic origins although their consequences
will differ in character and severity. This view furnishes the realization that hazards are
not simply the agents most closely identified with injuries. Merely regulating them is not
the sure way to limit their effect. In fact it is necessary first to employ a means of
controlling the causes responsible for the presence of injurious agents. This in essence is
the practice of safety management. (Ref 9:5)
2.1.2
The primary objectives of safety management systems are to regulate formally the
activities of the enterprise in order that they are carried out safely, to continually improve
safety performance, and to support a strong safety culture. Additional benefits of a safety
management system include: (Ref 8:19)
To develop and implement an efficient safety management system, which address the
following subjects, as listed below:
Management of change;
Audit and review (addressing the periodic, systematic assessment of the Safety
Policy and effectiveness and suitability of the safety management system); and
2.1.3
Control requires action, but the steps that are taken must be acceptable. They have to
meet the objective without interfering significantly with other aims that may affected.
Often, it seems that safetys requirements conflict with fiscal restraints, convenience, or
other factors. When the necessity for safe action is seen to be great enough, it may preempt other needs. Even then, however, other priorities must be considered and controls
for safety may not be optimized. (Ref 9:6,7)
Recently the growing demand for safety and safety regulations has been shaken by strong
public insistence on inflation control and increased productivity to be competitive in
2.1.4
The following factors which affect the safety performance of construction companies,
they are listed below: (Ref 8:22)
1. Written safety policy (WSP) and measurable safety targets.
2. Communication of the WSP to the various concerned parties.
3. Safety system, including department.
4. Safety committee at company level.
5. Safety budget.
6. Time spent by the senior management and the company on safety matters.
It is believed that the most crucial factor affecting the safety performance of contractors
is the amount of safety budget available. Safety system was being identified by the
clients employees as the most important factor, and identified by the officials as the
second most important ranking to the time spent by the senior management. It would
appear that contractors employee have a higher degree of expectation on their seniors to
give more time to safety matters. If they do, this in turn may motivate the contractors
staff at lower level to take construction safety more seriously. Having said that, it is
peculiar to note that the contractors employees have a lower expectation, than the other
two groupings, concerning the time spent by their management on safety matters. (Ref :
12)
2.1.5
In many enterprises, contractors are used to carry out certain types of work affecting
safety where the enterprise does not have sufficient resources or the correct specialists.
The use of contractors has, in some cases, increased the risk of chemical incidents. This
may be due to the fact that the contractors do not have sufficient knowledge or training in
the enterprise safety policy and procedures, or there is not sufficient co-ordination with
regular staff. A basic principle should be that the contracted workforce receives the
proper training for the installation, and should work under the same conditions as would
employees, applying the normal enterprise safety policy and procedures. (Ref 8:517)
The term indicators is used to mean observable measures that provide insights into a
concept safety - that is difficult to measure directly. The two types of indicators are
included in the Guidance: activities indicators and outcome indicators:
Activities indicators are designed to help identify whether enterprises/organizations are
taking actions believed to lower risks and
Outcome indicators are designed to help measure whether such actions are, in fact,
leading to less likelihood of an accident occurring and/or less adverse impact on human
health or the environment from an accident.
Guidance for Developing Safety Performance Indicators (Ref 4:46)
Outcome Indicators
1. Extent the contractors act in accordance with the requirements and policies of the
enterprise.
2. Extent of incidents attributed to contractors or visitors as a root or contributing
cause.
Activities Indicators
1. Are there procedures for the selection and hiring of contractors to help ensure
safety? Do they address:
2. Are there procedures to help ensure safety in relation to contractors working onsite, including:
3. Are contractors treated in the same way regarding safety as employees in all
relevant aspects (safety requirements, incident reporting, etc.)?
4. Is there a system for monitoring and giving appropriate information to contractors
and visitors to the installation (recognizing that different information may need to
be given to different types of visitors)?
2.1.6
The disabling injury severity rate is defined as the number of days lost or charged per
million employee hours worked. Days lost include all scheduled charges for all deaths,
permanent total and permanent partial disabilities, plus the total days of disability from
all temporary total injuries which occur during the period covered.
The disabling injury severity rate is expressed as:
Disabling Injury Severity Rate (S) := Total days charged * 106
------------------------------------------------------------------
( N/MH) * 200,000
Where:
N
MH = Man hours ( Total hours worked by all employees during the reference year).
200,000 = Base for 100 full-time equivalent workers working 40 hours per week, 50
Weeks year.
2.2
Each enterprise should have a system for reporting and dealing with all deviating events
which differ from normal conditions and which could have adverse effects on safety,
health or environment. This is the basis from which the organizations can learn from
experience to avoid repeating similar dangerous occurrences. (Ref :17)
Events which actually lead to measurable consequences damages to people,
environment or property should all be reported and handled promptly and efficiently. It
would obviously be the objective to have as few as possible of these kinds of events
(accidents). (Ref :14)
Events which do not lead to any measurable consequences, but which could have resulted
in consequences, had the circumstances been different near-misses, or other learning
experiences should also be reported and handled in a similar way. The objective
should also be to minimize such events; however, efforts should be made to have as many
of them as possible reported. This is of particular concern because there is a tendency not
to report events when there are no consequences.
2.2.1
Unsafe acts and unsafe conditions are also the cause of near miss/near hit accidents.
Near miss accident is a widely used term in the safety industry and is used in the
workplace to describe an incident that did not result in an injury. Near miss accident"
literally means that an injury actually occurred. Near hit incident is a better description.
Near hit incidents are incidents that result in neither injury nor property damage but have
the potential to cause injury or property damage and require corrective action to prevent
their reoccurrence. (Ref 4:93)
Simple procedures for dealing with near hit incidents are:
1. Immediately report near miss incidents to your supervisor. The potential for such
incidents exists throughout the workplace and all employees are required to report
them when they occur.
2.2.2
Management should establish procedures to ensure that all accidents are investigated, to
identify the obvious as well as the underlying causes. A thorough accident investigation
will yield a number of lessons and corrective actions leading to specific measures to
eliminate or reduce the probability of recurrence. (Ref 4:147)
Reports should be prepared at the conclusion of the investigation which will include:
Number of leaks of process materials found on inspection at the end of the month
(compared with the previous month);
Frequency of actuation of critical alarms compared with the previous month (this
can be a simple number to collect on a computer-controlled plant);
Number of alarms and trips due to be tested each month, and the number which
fail the test;
Number of control instruments recalibrated and the number which were out of
calibration by a defined significant amount, the number of points to be inspected
for corrosion or thickness, and the number found to be in need of attention.
STEP 3 - By undergoing the hazard studies on each sector of the industrys area, further
refine the understanding of critical features and procedures. Concurrently, a program of
internal auditing should be set up, involving people from within the company and
including those from the area under study. (Ref :10)
The above steps progressively improve the routine monitoring of process safety. As
implemented, there will be changes in the nature of the audits involving non-company
staff. The objectives are:
To review the quality of the monitoring and reporting systems and internal audits;
To probe one or two selected areas in detail to keep the internal audit system
honed;
2.3
PLANT
2.3.1
The case study of this report is about ARAMCO Berri Gas Plant, and its two contractors
namely Ethan recovery project (F-20 BI 3150), and Qatif Project ( BI 3022). Berri gas
plant department (BGPD) is the first gas plant built by Saudi ARAMCO located south of
Jubail Industrial city. It processes associated gas and condensate streams from Safaniya,
Marjan, Zuluf, Abqaiq and Abu Ali to produce fuel gas, C3 + NGL, and sulfur. As a result
of the latest expansions the plant processing capacity has increased to 1.2 BCSFD.
As early as project proposal, BGP actively participate in a constructability review
meetings that are conducted for each project. One of the review objectives is to address
the construction safety concerns and implement corrective measures during the design
phase. For example, for the upgrade of fire water system project (BI 3172), the project
execution was planned to maintain sufficient firewater coverage during the construction
to achieve the above objective. In addition, each package was subdivided to smaller
sections to minimize area and equipment at all times.
Also for ethane and NGL recovery project (ER-3150) a decision was taken to execute
part of the project early to clear the F-20 site from existing above and under ground
process piping and power cable. This effort was taken by BGP and Northern Area project
Dept. (NAPD) to better provide a safe and accessible construction area.
2.3.2
Saudi ARAMCO representative which is then reviewed by BGP and loss prevention
department.
This program is in accordance with Saudi ARAMCO construction safety manual, which
provides each contractor with the fundamental requirements to achieve safe working
environment. In addition, each sub-contractor develops his own job-specific loss
prevention program to ensure full understanding and superb implementation of the
program by each of the indirect and direct persona. Also, each contractor has his own
safety advisor(s) to monitor and to ensure that work is proceeding in compliance with the
safety plan.
Saudi ARAMCO has a standard set of programs to meet the safety programs on any
construction activity taking place in organization. Berri gas plant and NA projects are
implementing the following for all projects related work to ensure that the requirement
and proper authorization are met. The following are the some of the BGP safety programs
being implemented.
Scaffolding
Berri gas plant has a system in place to ensure safe use of scaffolding inside the
plant. Any scaffolding in tagged with red for on-hold scaffolding, green for safe to
use scaffolding or a yellow tag for uncompleted scaffolding. Contractor and
company safety advisor conduct regular scaffolding inspections and responsible
for issuing tags as applicable.
Fencing
Where ever possible and deemed to be safe, BGP request the construction site to
be fenced and isolated from operating area. This is to avoid non-essential people
from entering operating areas, provide better supervision of construction activities
as well as expediting construction progress.
Road closure
Prior to a road closure work permit issuance; an approval is required from the
plants foreman and the shift superintendent. Security and fire prevention are
officially notified and an alternative access is provided to affected area to ensure
proper emergency access is maintained all the times.
Working at elevations
All works at elevation requires prior approval by completing the appropriate form,
which includes a checklist to verify that all safety items are met and personal are
fully aware of the safety requirements.
Piping Tie-in:
A detailed and approved design package and material take off is required for each
tie-in form by obtaining all required signatures to ensure complete understanding
of the work, safe execution and timely execution of work.
2.3.3
The main objective of the NIRS program is to create an open communication channel for
every BGP employee to repot near-misses. A Near miss is an incident which was about
to happen.
NIRS Benefits:
A near miss is an undesired event in which physical harm to people and damage to
property are averted due to lack of contact with a source of energy or the energy transfer
staying below the threshold of the body or structure, but having the potential for harmful
contact and/or energy transfer. The following are some examples of near-misses as best
fit in with the definition given above:
A falling brick which landed on the ground without causing any equipment
damage or any human injury.
A vehicle passing through red traffic lights without hitting any other vehicle(s)
which could have resulted into injury possibly to himself and others and damage
to his and /or other vehicles.
An NGL tank within Saudi ARAMCO facilities that got badly corroded to the
extent that it could have resulted in failure, had it been for its timely discovery
through inspection.
A relief Valve that was not properly lined up and led to over pressurizing a
hydrocarbon product storage tank, but was discovered in time to save the tank
from leaking and failing.
Scaffolding that was found swaying, and handled before any human injuries or
property damage resulted.
Several corroded structural support members holding up LPG and steam pipes,
were identified and replaced timely saving the plant structure from collapsing.
2.4
For this to take place efficiently there are certain criterion categorized in the following
section according to its importance:
1. Overall policies
2. Safety goals and objectives
3. Safety leadership
4. Safety management systems
a. Personnel
b. Management of human resources
c. Training and education
d. Internal communication/information
e. Working environment
5. Safety performance review and evaluation
1. Overall Policies
A critical element of a safety culture is that there should be a clear manifestation of that
culture and the long-term objectives regarding safety from the top management,
supported throughout the organization (including the board of directors). This should be
laid down in a Safety Policy. The Policy should provide standards and strategies designed
to protect the health and safety of workers and the public, as well as the environment. The
Policy should form support for the various strategies and guidance for detailed regulation
related to safety. The Policy should not be affected by short- term changes in the
economic situation of the enterprise. The Policy is also an important instrument to convey
the corporate/company view on safety to external stakeholders. (Ref 4:72)
2. Safety Goals and Objectives
The ultimate goal for every enterprise should be to have zero incidents. This goal
provides the incentive to achieve the best possible performance and ensures continuous
vigilance towards greater safety. Seeking to achieve this goal and managing safety
requires a constant effort that involves establishing safety-related objectives,
implementing those objectives, and measuring and reviewing progress in meeting those
objectives. This should be reflected in the long-term, overall Safety Policy. In order to
ensure day-to-day implementation of the Policy, concrete goals and objectives should be
established and agreed upon by the entire organization. (Ref 4:42)
3. Safety Leadership
The management of the enterprise should ensure that there is a sound foundation, on
which all work can be based, to ensure safety. There should be a true safety culture that is
accepted by all levels of the organization. The top management commitment to safety
should be such that it is experienced in the rest of the organization as genuine.
4. Safety Management Systems
All enterprises should have safety management systems, as part of their overall
management of the enterprises (in fact, there is a clear correlation between safely-run
enterprises and well-managed operations). A safety management system provides a
structured approach to those arrangements needed to achieve good safety performance
within an enterprise. It should be based on the Safety Policy. The system should define an
ambition level that the enterprise considers adequate for its business, as well as the safety
concerns and requirements specific to their sites. As a minimum, the requirements of the
legislation and other imperative sources should, under all circumstances, be fulfilled.
5. Safety Performance Review and Evaluation
3.
CASE
STUDY
OF
SAFETY
PROGRAMS
OF
TWO
The Qatif project was built by TECHNIP Saudi Arabia Ltd. The basic construction policy
that is been followed by the QATIF project is TECHNIP Saudi Arabia construction safety
policy. All the employees in Saudi Arabia including subcontractors will abide by the
TECHNIP requirements in addition to the Saudi ARAMCO requirements. TECHNIP
Saudi Arabia safety policy for construction is used to ensure the health and safety of all
the construction staff working in different industrial sectors of Saudi Arabia. It also
includes the employees of subcontractors, and other persons involved in construction
activities directly or indirectly. These policies can be summarized as follows:
1. Full compliance with the national laws and statutes and Saudi ARAMCO safety,
health and/or environmental and implementation of more stringent standards and
procedures where appropriate.
2. Prevention of accidents by means of information and indoctrination.
3. Direct participation of all involved parties in the actions aiming to a safer working
environment.
4. Promotion of the concepts working safety and safety first by means of
normal challenge and direct incentives.
5. Continuous vigilance in order that safety measures and precautions are actually
taken in field, at the right time and following the established procedures.
6. Immediate and constructive suppression/ correction of situations/ behaviors which
determine or tend to determine unsafe working conditions.
The total cost of the project is 370 million $ and the total number of man hours worked
was 16, 534,905.
Project Statistics:
The following are the project statistics for the Berri Gas Qatif project.
Type of
accidents
LTI
RI
NM
PD
MVI
No. Of
accidents
79
17
16
LEGEND
LTI
RI
NM
PD
MVI
F
The Ethane recovery project (BI 3150) is carried out by AMEC BKW Arabia Ltd.
AMEC process and energy limited recognize its responsibility in health, safety, fire and
will ensure by means of managerial controls, compliance with the Saudi ARAMCO
construction safety manual directives, and all applicable Saudi ARAMCO GIs and
standards, that these issues are effectively managed on a day to day basis at the new Berri
gas plant ethane recovery project. The total cost of the project is about 466 million $, and
the total number of man hours worked was 23,721,505.
Health, Safety and security objectives
It is AMECs objective to manage and carry out all the associated activities of new
facility with zero time-lost injuries or significant incidents, no detrimental health
incidents and no breaches of security. The main objectives are:
Identify the activities of significant risk and by means of risk assessment will
prepare control measures and written work method statements to alleviate such
matters.
Ensure that persons are trained/ instructed in the required health and safety etc
control measures applicable to their work including method statements, permit to
work systems etc.
SAFETY POLICIES
The safety policies for the contractor are as follows:
1.
Ensure that the project health and safety plan is prepared, together with
appropriate health and safety arrangements, rules and procedures common to all
contractors involved in the project.
2.
Provide for the staff and implement, or where necessary agree or determine for
others, safe methods of working and systems which identify hazards at each place
of work within his responsibility.
3.
Plan and organize work to be carried out to the required standards with minimum
risk to persons, plant, equipment and materials.
4.
To act immediately on any breach of safety rules or unsafe situation this comes to
the attention and reports such breaches to appropriate management.
5.
Make provision for adequate welfare facilities, protective clothing and equipment
and first aid relevant to the project.
6.
Ensure that all the personnel including subcontractors are made aware of and
comply with the project health and safety plan; and
7.
Project Statistics:
The following are the project statistics for the Berri Gas Ethan recovery project.
Type of
accidents
LTI
RI
NM
PD
MVI
No. Of
accidents
12
14
LEGEND
LTI
RI
NM
PD
MVI
F
F
7%
MVI
12%
PD
32%
LTI
5%
RI
16%
LTI
RI
NM
PD
MVI
NM
28%
4.
QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN
The following section describes a questionnaire to assess the safety management for any
industrial contractor.
indicators, which can be used a tool for measuring the workplace health & safety self
management systems review. It is also used to demonstrate that an organization has
addressed or has given an undertaking to address specific workplace health and safety
management systems criteria.
The questionnaire was subdivided into the following main categories in order to
incorporate all the aspects of the safety management issues; this will give a wide range of
evaluation criterion. Those are:
A. Health and safety policy communication
B. Allocation of Responsibilities / Accountability
C. Health and safety consultation
D. Hazard identification, evaluation and control
E. Training
F. Workplace specific issues
G. Reporting and investigation
H. Emergency planning
Calculating scores for the questionnaire:
This questionnaire is a self assessment questionnaire; each section of the questionnaire
has been assigned a certain credit. Apart from that each and every question has been
given some marks, according to its importance in the section. The final assessment is
calculated as follows.
If the answer for any question is YES for any question in the questionnaire, then
assign full marks allotted to that.
If the answer is NO and you are able to achieve the state of YES in about 3
months then assign 20% of the marks allotted, else assign ZERO.
After completion of questionnaire in a section sum all the gained marks and
multiply with the corresponding weight given for that section. Then sum up the
scores of all the sections for getting total scores.
The sample for the scoring is shown below:
In relation to section (A) you are able to answer yes to question 1, therefore
award yourself 5 marks. The answer to question 2 is also yes, therefore award
yourself another 5 marks. For section (A) your total mark is 10. Now multiply
your total mark (i.e. 10) by the numerical weighting given as 3. Your total score
for section (A) is 30. Write 30 in the appropriate space at the end of section (A).
Now move to section (B). For question 1 your initial answer is no, you make a
commitment to have these in place within 3 months of completing the initial
assessment, therefore award yourself 20% of 2 marks i.e. 0.4. For questions 2 and
3 you are able to answer yes, therefore award yourself 5 + 3 = 8 marks. For
section (B) your total mark is 0.4 + 8 = 8.4. Now multiply your total mark (i.e.
8.4) by the numerical weighting given as 3. Your total score for section (B) is
25.2. Write 25.2 in the appropriate space at the end of section (B).
SECTION/QUESTIONS
Yes
No
If "No"
when will
you be able
to answer
'Yes'
COMMENTS
training or distributed as
written policy?
At:__/__/__
Expectations of managers
5 marks
and employees
General statement of
management response to
incidents/ accidents
E.g. is the policy signed and
At:__/__/__
reviewed by Executive
Management?
5 marks
Multiply total marks for section (A) By the weighting
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
5 marks
3. Are peoples performances
regularly evaluated against
these responsibilities?
At:__/__/__
3 marks
Multiply total marks for section (B) ......... by the weighting
Your score for (B) =
(C) HEALTH AND SAFETY CONSULTATION
1. Does a group exist and have
At:__/__/__
issues?
2 marks
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
how?
2 marks
Multiply total marks for section (C) ......... by the weighting
Your score for (C) =
(D) HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION AND
CONTROL
At:__/__/__
potential risks?
2 marks
2. Does the workplace use any
of the following to identify
risks and hazards:
Workplace inspections
Formal/informal work
discussions
At:__/__/__
Independent audits
Hazard reporting system
Job analysis/observation
Other
3 marks
3. Is the Health and Safety
At:__/__/__
Committee, employees or
(a) Probability of
occurrence
(b) Frequency of
exposure
2 marks
Multiply total marks for section (D) ......... by the weighting
(E) TRAINING
1. Is the Induction training
documented as a program?
At:__/__/__
2 marks
2. Are records of training maintained?
1 mark
3. Is on- the -job Training documented
as a program?
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
2 marks
4. Are records of this training
At:__/__/__
maintained?
2 marks
5. Is training provided to supervisors
to ensure they have the ability to
discharge allocated health and
At:__/__/__
safety responsibilities?
2 marks
Multiply total marks for section (E) ......... by the weighting
Your score for (E) =
At:__/__/__
prescribed occupations?
1 mark
2. Are there checks in place to
ensure you comply with
certification requirements?
At:__/__/__
1 mark
3. Is training and supervision
provided for persons seeking/
needing certification?
At:__/__/__
1 mark
4. Do you know the provisions of
the Workplace Health and Safety
Act and Regulation regarding the
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
1 mark
8. Do you regularly inspect and
report on gear?
1 mark
e.g. manufacturers
recommendations
e.g. ropes, ladders, etc.
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
equipment?
1 mark
10. Where personal equipment is
provided, is there a system which
ensures it is stored, maintained,
worn correctly and replaced when
At:__/__/__
necessary?
1 mark
Multiply total marks for section (F) ......... by the weighting
Your score for (F) =
(G) REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION
1. Do you know which events
need to be recorded and or
reported?
Bodily Injury.
1 mark
2. Is there a formalized
procedure for reporting?
1 mark
At:__/__/__
1 mark
4. Has the responsibility for
recording incidents and
maintaining records been
allocated to a position?
1 mark
At:__/__/__
1 mark
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
prompt investigation/
analysis of incidents/
accidents been allocated?
1 mark
8. Are Records of
At:__/__/__
investigation including
responsibility for corrective
action kept and available?
2 marks
9. Does management receive
At:__/__/__
Weighting for (H ) =
8
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
At:__/__/__
5.
Safety Management has become one of the most essential elements of Risk Management
over the years. Failures by companies to develop and implement safe systems of work
can result in substantial claims by employees (and former employees) for injuries, and
long term diseases, and physical disablement, and in some cases prosecution by the
regulatory bodies. The direct costs on a company of such claims together with the
more substantial non-insurable on-costs of business interruption, loss of expertise, and
investigating time taken up by senior management can be phenomenal and far
outweigh the costs covered by the insurance policies.
The knowledge base in the Safety Management System above forms the basis for the
following additional independent Safety Consultancy services to clients:
Due Diligence Audits: Safeguarding against unknown and costly industrial risks
during the acquisition of a company, and any subsequent long term financial
liability.
Expert Witness Reports: Accident investigations for personal injury claims and/or
plant/property damage, during litigation proceedings.
The overall safety record for the two projects was quite good. However there are quite
few near miss cases for Ethane recovery project (12) compared with Qatif project (79).
Motor vehicle incidents in Qatif project are two times higher than the Ethan Recovery
project. Qatif project had no fire incident; however Ethan Recovery project had 3. In
general, When comparing both the projects performance Ethane recovery project (BI
3150) has a better safety management program. In fact both the project have almost same
safety management program as the Saudi ARAMCO is forcing those two contractors for
applying those regulations.
Recommendations:
Some of the recommendations that could help in improving the safety program of other
contractors or Plant operations are mentioned as follows:
1. Lifting operations over a live or energized pipe racks:
Critical lift plans shall be thoroughly studied and all existing facilities are verified
and identified in the sketched/drawings prior to perform the intended lift. The
existing facilities shall be legibly reflected in the attached drawing. A method of
statement or lifting procedure is to be included, these items will enhance the
awareness of plant operation personnel.
2. Plant operation personnel shall have an assigned Rigger so as to countercheck the
prepared Critical Lift Plan by the contractor ensuring that all requirements of
General Instructions (Crane Lifts) are met.
3. Movable Stairs to be provided through out the plant so that these stairs will help
employees to escape quickly whenever emergency is to occur. Whenever any
instructions have came up from BGP Supt. Employees are ready to leave and
evacuate the affected area.
5. Training of employees:
A regular training for critical work shall be consistently implemented to enhance
safety awareness of individual and remind him about carrying out work safely. It
is not only those workers on site who are doing the physical job but also technical
support employees such as CTS, ITS,MTS, Operations to acquire a better
understanding about the regulations and standards.
REFERENCES
1. Roth, R.D. and G.R. Smith, Safety Program and the construction manager,
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 117 No. 2 pp 360
361.
2. Donald W hine, John Lewko and Joi Blanco, Alignment to workspace safety
principles: Application to mining, Journal of Safety research, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp
173 185 (1999)
3. Jimme Hinze, and John Gambatese, Factors that influence safety performance
of specialty contractors, Journal of Construction Engineering and management,
Vol. 129, No. 2 April 1, 2003
4. Guidance on Safety performance indicators, Organization for Economic Cooperation
and
Development,
Chemical
Plant
safety
Source:
http://www.oecd.org/department/0,2688,en_2649_34365_1_1_1_1_1,00.html
5. TARCISIO A. SAURIN, CARLOS T. FORMOSO and LIA B. M.
GUIMARS, Safety and production: an integrated planning and control model,
Construction Management and Economics (February 2004) 22, 159169.
6. Industrial safety report at OSHA compliance training
http://www.atc.tec.mn.us/CustomizedTraining/Web%20Pages/safety.htm
7. Department of Industrial Relations Chapter 4. Division of Industrial Safety,
Department of safety California, USA
http://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sub7.html
8. Amarjit Singh, Jimme Hinze & Richard J. Coble, Implementation of safety
and health on construction sites, Proceeding of Second International Conference
of CIB at Honolulu, 24 27 March 1999.
of Construction Engineering and Management -- January/February 2000 -Volume 126, Issue 1, pp. 77-79.
16. Monitoring Hazards to prevent major industrial accidents, Health and
employment safety Act 1994. Department of Labor safety, Willington New
Zealand.
17. Moral, ethical obligations an issue for safety design. (1997). Engineering
Times. NSPE, Washington, D.C., 19(8), 16, 23.
18. M. Edwards, The Design of an Accident Investigation Procedure, Applied
Ergonomics, 1981.
19. International Labour Organisation. Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents.
ISBN 92-2-107101-4.
20. Rethinking Construction. 2002. Rethinking Construction: 2002. Rethinking
Construction Ltd. London. (available at www.rethinkingconstruction.org).
21. Construction Industry Development Board. 2002. 2002 Construction Industry
Indicators: First interim report. Pretoria.
22. Harper, R., and Koehn, E. (1998), Managing industrial construction safety in
southeast Texas. J. Construction Engg. & Management, 124(6), 3539.
23. Battikha, M. G., and Russell, A. D. (1988). Construction quality management
present and future. Can. Journal Civil Engg., 25(4), 401411.
24. Hinze, J. (1998). Identifying root causes of construction injuries. J. Constr.
Eng. Manage., 124(1), 6771.
25. Raouf, A., Dhillon, B.S.,Safety Assessment, Lewis publishers, 1994