Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR FIXED BEARING


Design Data
Span of bridge
Standard Temp.
Rotation ( Total)
Rotation(due to permanent action)
Rotation ( due to variable action)
Grade of concrete
Concrete stress ( Non seismic)
Concrete stress ( seismic)
Neoprene Pad stress
PTFE stress (working )
Steel stress(working ) for design use

65
+-25
0.01 x
0.0075 x
0.0025 x
M40
20
25
35
40
280

m
C
1.30 =
1.30 =
1.30 =
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa

DESIGN DIMENSION OF FIXED BEARING


Neoprene pad dia
Neoprene pad thickness
Pot base effective dia (actual)
Pot base thickness
Pot internal dia
Pot depth
Pot wall thickness
Piston effective contact dia
Piston thickness above spiggot
Spiggot projection
Bolt diameter
No. of bolt per component
Bolt flange thickness
No of sealing ring
Total thickness of rings
Dia of pedestal
Vertical face of Piston
Length of Lug
Thickness of distribution plate
Dia of distribution plate

Kailash Builders

372.0
26.0
480.00
28.00
372.00
47.00
44.00
480.00
30.00
36.00
20.00
12
16.00
2
4.00
960.00
9.00
20.00
25
620

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
nos
mm
nos
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

0.013 radian
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Loading and Requirement

Non Seismic Case


Load

MT

Vertical Load
Dead Load + Live load

250.00

Total
250.00

Horizental Load

Total

Longitudinal
Transverse
Resultant

25.00
0.00
25
Seismic Case
Load

MT

Vertical Load
Dead Load + Live load

250.00

Total
250.00

Horizental Load

Total

Longitudinal
Transverse
Resultant

41.20
0.00
41.20

Movement of superstructure

0.00 +

0.00 +

0.00 =

Calculation for permissible stresses in Pedestal concrete


Loaded area ( A2 )

x 480.00

^ 2.00

/ 4 = 180955.7368 mm^2

Dispersed area( A1)

x 960.00

^ 2.00

/ 4 = 723822.9474 mm^2

Permissible concrete stress

A1
A2

x 0.25 fck

20 Mpa

Non Seismic Case


Design of Neoprene Pad (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.2.3)
Neoprene pad stress

Kailash Builders

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 372 ^ 2

23 Mpa <

Hence OK

35 Mpa

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Concrete stress at Pot Base (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.1.5)


I . Direct Bearing stress due to vertical load

=
250.00
0.785

14 Mpa <

x 10000
x 480 ^ 2

20 Mpa

Hence OK

II.Flexural stress due to active resulting from acting horizontal force


Eccentricity

Stress

28 +

26 +

4 =

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
1.336 Mpa

58

mm

58

III.Flexural stress due to induced resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)

di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

M .ed =
=
=

2)

372.0 mm
2.09
89.314
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

372.0
51478848
15991389.3 N-mm

di / he =

^3 x(
x 0.311

M . R.d =

M . R.d =

Total induced moment =


=
=

15
2.2

k2

14.31
89.314

12.5
58.8

15
101

0.0098 +

89.3 x

186.00 x

9300000 N-mm

M .ed +
15991389 +
25291389

0.0982 x

Kailash Builders

12.5
1.8

372.0
186

186.00 mm
25.00 t

= 14.31

14.31
2.089

2.09 x

0.20 x
=

372.0
26.0

k1

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

Stress

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1

2.3

M . R.d
9300000

25291389
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

25.00 x

10000

0.0033

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total flexual stress

1.336 +

2.33 =

3.665 Mpa

<

15.00 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
20

3.66 =
15.00

<

0.94

1.00

Hence OK

Concrete stress at Piston Base


I.Direct bearing stress due to Vertical load (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.1.5)
Stress =

250.00 x
0.785

10000
x 480 ^ 2

<

13.82 Mpa

172.5 Mpa

Hence OK
II.Flexual stress due to active moment resulting from acting horizental force

e =
Stress

30 +
=
=

36 -

4.00 =

62 mm

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
1.428 Mpa

62

III.Flexural stress due to induced moment resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =
di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

Kailash Builders

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)
372.0 mm
2.09
89.314
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1


di / he =

372.0
26.0

= 14.31

k1

14.31
2.089

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.31
89.314

12.5
58.8

15
101

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

M .ed =
=
=

2)

372.0
51478848
15991389.3 N-mm

^3 x(
x 0.311

M . R.d =

89.3 x

0.0033

372.0
186

186.00 mm
25.00 t

M . R.d =

0.20 x
=

186.00 x

25.00 x

10000

9300000 N-mm

Total induced moment =

M .ed +
15991389 +
25291389

=
=
=

0.0982 x

Total flexual stress

0.0098 +

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

Stress

2.09 x

2.3

1.428 +

M . R.d
9300000

25291389
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

2.33 =

3.757 Mpa

<

151.80 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
172.5

Design of Pot Wall


Force from Pad

3.76 =
151.80

1.00

Hence OK

( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.3.1.1.7)
=

Pressure from Pad ( P1 ) =


=

Total horizental force on wall =

372.00 x

26.00 x

222474.651634
2 x
47.00 x 44.00
53.79 Mpa

25.00 t

Total Horizental stress into wall due to horizental force ( P2 )

Kailash Builders

<

0.10

23

= 222474.652 N ( per one section of ring)

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total P

=
=
=

25 x
10000
2 x
47.00 x 44.00
60.44 Mpa
P1 + P2
53.79 + 60.44
114.23
Mpa

<

168 Mpa
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.2.)

Hence OK

Seismic Case
Design of Neoprene Pad (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.2.3)
Neoprene pad stress

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 372 ^ 2

23 Mpa <

x 10000
x 480 ^ 2

14 Mpa <

35 Mpa

Hence OK

Concrete stress at Pot Base (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.1.5)


I . Direct Bearing stress due to vertical load

=
250.00
0.785

25 Mpa

Hence OK

II.Flexural stress due to active resulting from acting horizontal force


Eccentricity

Stress

=
=

28 +

26 +

4 =

41 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
2.201 Mpa

58

mm

58

III.Flexural stress due to induced resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =
di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

Kailash Builders

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)
372.0 mm
2.09
89.314
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1


di / he =

372.0
26.0

= 14.31

k1

14.31
2.089

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.31
89.314

12.5
58.8

15
101

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

M .ed =
=
=

2)

372.0
51478848
15991389.3 N-mm

^3 x(
x 0.311

M . R.d =

89.3 x

186.00 x

25.00 x

10000

0.20 x
=

9300000 N-mm

Total induced moment =

M .ed +
15991389 +
25291389

=
=
=

0.0982 x
=

2.3

2.201 +

M . R.d
9300000

25291389
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

2.33 =

4.530 Mpa

<

15.00 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
25

4.53 =
19.50

<

0.78

Hence OK

Concrete stress at Piston Base


I.Direct bearing stress due to Vertical load (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.1.5)
Stress =

250.00 x
0.785

10000
x 480 ^ 2

<

13.82 Mpa

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

0.0033

186.00 mm
25.00 t

M . R.d =

Total flexual stress

0.0098 +

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

Stress

2.09 x

172.5 Mpa

1.00

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

II.Flexual stress due to active moment resulting from acting horizontal force

e =

30 +

Stress

=
=

36 -

4.00 =

62 mm

41 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
2.353 Mpa

62

III.Flexural stress due to induced moment resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)

di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

M .ed =
=
=

2)

372.0 mm
2.09
89.314
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

372.0
51478848
15991389.3 N-mm

di / he =

= 14.31

14.31
2.089

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.31
89.314

12.5
58.8

15
101

2.09 x

0.0098 +

89.3 x

186.00 x

41.20 x

10000

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

M . R.d =

186.00 mm
41.20 t
0.20 x

Total induced moment =


=
=

15326400 N-mm

M .ed +
15991389 +
31317789

=
0.0982 x
=

Kailash Builders

372.0
26.0

k1

^3 x(
x 0.311

M . R.d =

Stress

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1

2.9

M . R.d
15326400

31317789
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

0.0033

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total flexual stress

2.353 +

2.88 =

5.237 Mpa

<

151.80 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
172.5

Design of Pot Wall


Force from Pad

5.24 =
151.80

<

0.11

1.00

Hence OK

( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.3.1.1.7)
=

372.00 x

Pressure from Pad ( P1 ) =

26.00 x

23

= 222474.652 N ( per one section of ring)

222474.651634
2 x
47.00 x 44.00
53.79 Mpa

Total horizental force on wall =

41.20 t

Total Horizental stress into wall due to horizental force ( P2 )


=

Total P

=
=
=

41 x
10000
2 x
47.00 x 44.00
99.61 Mpa
P1 + P2
53.79 + 99.61
153.40
Mpa

<
Hence OK

Kailash Builders

168 Mpa
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.2.)

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN CHECKS


Rotation capacity

( IRC-83 part III - clause 926.2.3)

Check compression at edge of Neoprene Pad


Max . Permitted =
=
=

0.15

Rotation ( Radius )

15 % of T
x 22.00
3.3 mm

( T is the thickness of neoprene pad less thick of ring)

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.2.3)

=
372
=

3.3
x 0.5
0.018 radian

>

0.01 radian

Hence OK
D/ T ratio of Neoprene Pad

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.2.3)


=

372.0
26.0
14.31

< 15
Hence OK

Vertical face of Piston required


Width =

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.1.3.1)

1.3 x Seismic H Load x


( Pot dia
- 1.50 )

1.30 x
370.50

41.20 x
x 0.75

6.884

<

10000
x 0.75 x 280
10000
x 280
9.00 mm

Hence OK
Bolt Design ( Non Seismic )
Total horizental force

Kailash Builders

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.6)


25 t

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Contribution to resistance by Bolts ( F1 )


Nos of Bolts
Diameter of Bolt
Cross section area
Total cross section area
Shear strenght of bolt Gr 8.8
Shear strenght of bolt Gr 8.8

=
=
=
=
=
=

12
20.00
245.00
2940.0
190
190

Total shear force offer by the Bolts ( F1 ) =

nos
mm
mm
mm
Mpa
Mpa ( Seismic case )

2940.00
x 190
10000
55.9 t ( Non -Seismic Case)

2940.00
x 190
10000
55.9 t ( Seismic Case)

Total shear force offer by the Bolts ( F1 ) =

Contribution to resistance by Friction ( F2 )


Vertical load ( min)

0 t ( Non-seismic )

Vertical load ( min)

0 t ( Seismic )

Co-efficient of friction between concrete and steel

Friction Force ( F2 )

0 x

0 =

0 t( Non-seismic case )

Friction Force ( F2 )

0 x

0 =

0 t ( Seismic case )

Total resistance offered =


( Non seismic case )

55.9 +

0 =

Total resistance offered =


( Seismic case )

55.9 +

DEWEL DESIGN

0.2

55.9 t

> 25.00 t
Hence OK
0 =

55.9 t

> 41.20 t
Hence OK
( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.6.5)

Dia =
50 mm
Length
190 mm
Non-seismic case and Seismic case
Horizental force over Dowel by Bolt
=
3 x
245 x
Stress =
50 x

139650
190

190 =
=

139650 N
14.70 Mpa
< 15.00 Mpa

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

POT INTERFACE

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.1.1.7)

Non - Seismic
Shear stress at cylinder and base interface considering 1mm slice
Fluid Pressure ( P1 )

=
=
=

Horizental force ( P2) =


=
=

Total stress

he x cc
bp
26.0 x 23.00
44.00
13.59
Mpa
1.5
di
1.5 x
372.0 x
22.911

13.59 +

x H
x bp
250000
44.00
Mpa

22.91 =

36.5 Mpa

< 126.0 Mpa


Hence OK

51.3 Mpa

< 126.0 Mpa


Hence OK

Seismic
Shear stress at cylinder and base interface considering 1mm slice
Fluid Pressure ( P1 )

=
=
=

Horizental force ( P2) =


=
=

Total stress

Kailash Builders

he x cc
bp
26.0 x 23.00
44.00
13.59
Mpa
1.5
di
1.5 x
372.0 x
37.757

13.59 +

x H
x bp
412000
44.00
Mpa

37.76 =

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Bearing stress at cylinder and base interface 1mm slice


Non-seismic case
Fluid pressuse( P1 )

Horizental force (P2)

6 x cc x he^
2 x
bp ^

6.0 x
2.0 x

Total stress

23.0 x 676.0
1936.00

24.1 Mpa

1.5 x

2
2

6.0 x H x ha
di x bp ^
2

1.5 x

6.0 x
372.0 x

250000 x 30.00
1936.00

93.7 Mpa

24.1 +

93.7 =

117.8 Mpa

< 184.8 Mpa


Hence OK

combine stressat cylindrical base interface considering 1mm slice


=

13881.55285396

133.7119050167 <

3997.32068922
252

Hence OK
Seismic case
Fluid pressuse( P1 )

Horizental force (P2)

6.0 x
2.0 x

2
2

23.0 x 676.0
1936.00

24.1 Mpa

1.5 x

Kailash Builders

6 x cc x he^
2 x
bp ^

1.5 x

154.5 Mpa

6.0 x H x ha
di x bp ^
2
6.0 x
372.0 x

412000 x 30.00
1936.00

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total stress

24.1 +

154.5 =

178.6 Mpa

< 184.8 Mpa


Hence OK

combine stressat cylindrical base interface considering 1mm slice


=

31881.5

7910.05059985

199.48 <

252
Hence OK

Stress into Lugs because of Horizontal force


Non-Seismic case
Total horizental force on bearing
Effective length of Lug taking shear

=
=

3.0 x

Thickness of Lug

Total cross sectional area of Lug


(Each Lug)

Total nos of Lug in each bearin

Horizental force on each Lug

Stress on Lug due to Horizental force

25 t

20.0 =

60.0 mm

16.00 mm
60.0 x

16.0 =

960 mm^2

12 nos
25
12

2t

20833.3333333
960

= 22 Mpa

<

126.0 Mpa

Hence OK

Seismic case
Total horizental force on bearing
Effective length of Lug taking shear

=
=

3.0 x

Thickness of Lug

Total cross sectional area of Lug


(Each Lug)

Total nos of Lug in each bearin

Horizental force on each Lug

Kailash Builders

25 t
20.0 =

60.0 mm

16.00 mm
60.0 x

16.0 =

12 nos
41.20
12

3t

960 mm^2

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Stress on Lug due to Horizental force

34333.3333333
960

<

= 36 Mpa

Check for thickness of Piston in bending : Top


Maximum Vertical load
Effective dia of Piston

=
=

250.00 t
480.00 mm

Effective area of the Top plate which contact with concrete


=
3.142 x
480.000 ^ 2
4
=
180955.7 mm^2
Stress on Top Plate

250.000 x 10000
180955.7

13.8 Mpa

Diameter of loaded area (Pad) =


Projection of piston

372.0 mm

480.00

372.0

Bending moment on the Top Plate =

54.0 mm

13.8 x

54.0^ 2

2
20143.05 N-mm

Thickness of Top Plate reqd to cater the B.M. =

20143.05
1 x
=

25.6 mm

6
184.8

<

30.0 mm

Hence OK
Check for thickness of pot in bending : Bottom
Maximum Vertical load
Effective dia of Piston

=
=

250.00 t
480.00 mm

Effective area of the Bottom plate which contact with concrete


=
3.142 x
480.000 ^ 2
4
=
180955.7 mm^2
Stress on Bot Plate

=
Diameter of loaded area (Pad) =
Projection of piston

Kailash Builders

250.000 x 10000
180955.7
13.8 Mpa
372.0 mm
480.00

372.0

126.0 Mpa

Hence OK

54.0 mm

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Bending moment on the Bot Plate =

13.8 x

54.0^ 2

2
20143.05 N-mm

Thickness of bottom Plate reqd to cater the B.M. =

20143.05
1 x
=

25.6 mm

6
184.8

<

28.0 mm

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR SLIDING BEARING


Design Data
Span of bridge
Standard Temp.
Rotation ( Total)
Rotation(due to permanent action)
Rotation ( due to variable action)
Grade of concrete
Concrete stress ( Non seismic)
Concrete stress ( seismic)
Neoprene Pad stress
PTFE stress (working )
Steel stress(working ) for design use

65
+-25
0.01 x
0.0075 x
0.0025 x
M40
20
25
35
40
280

m
C
1.30 =
1.30 =
1.30 =
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa
Mpa

DESIGN DIMENSION OF SLIDING BEARING


Neoprene pad dia
Neoprene pad thickness
PTFE size
Pot base effective dia (actual)
Pot base thickness
Pot internal dia
Pot depth
Pot wall thickness
Slide plate contact area dia
Slide plate thickness
Stainless steel thick( Gr 304 )
Effective thickness of slide plate
Piston outer diameter
Piston thickness above spiggot
Spiggot projection
Slide plate dimension (Rect )
Height of Guide Bar
Width of Guide Bar
Length of piston flat
Bolt diameter
No. of bolt per component
Bolt flange thickness
No of sealing ring
Total thickness of rings
Dia of pedestal
Vertical face of Piston
Width of Lug
Thickness of distribution plate
Size of Distribution plate

Kailash Builders

480.0

480.0

380.0
26.0
380.0
480.00
28.00
380.00
47.00
40.00
430.00
22.00
3.00
24.00
420.00
15.00
36.00
490.00
20.00
27.50
360.00
20.00
10
16.00
2
4.00
960.00
10.00
20.00
25
630

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
nos
mm
nos
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

0.013 radian
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Loading and Requirement

Non Seismic Case


Load

MT

Vertical Load
Dead Load + Live load

Total
250.00
250.00

Horizontal Load

Total

Longitudinal
Transverse
Resultant

25.00
0.00
25
Seismic Case

Load

MT

Vertical Load
Dead Load + Live load

Total
250.00
250.00

Horizontal Load

Total

Longitudinal
Transverse
Resultant

25.00
0.00
25.00

Movement of superstructure

13 mm

Calculation for permissible stresses in Pedestal concrete


Loaded area ( A2 )

x 480.0

^ 2.00

/ 4 =

180955.737 mm^2

Dispersed area( A1)

x 960.0

^ 2.00

/ 4 =

723822.947 mm^2

Permissible concrete stress

A1
A2

x 0.25 fck

20 Mpa

Non Seismic Case


Design of Neoprene Pad (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.2.3)
Neoprene pad stress

PTFE stress

Kailash Builders

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 380 ^ 2

22 Mpa <

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 380 ^ 2

22 Mpa <

35 Mpa

Hence OK

Hence OK

40 Mpa

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Concrete stress at Pot Base (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.1.5)


I . Direct Bearing stress due to vertical load

=
250.00
0.785

14 Mpa <

x 10000
x 480 ^ 2

20 Mpa

Hence OK

II.Flexural stress due to active resulting from acting horizontal force


Eccentricity

Stress

28 +

26 +

4 =

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
1.336 Mpa

58

mm

58

III.Flexural stress due to induced resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)

di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

M .ed =
=
=

2)

380.0 mm
2.14
94.508
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

di / he =

380.0
^3 x(
54872000
x 0.328
17998016 N-mm

M . R.d =

M . R.d =

Total induced moment =


=
=

15
2.2

k2

14.62
94.508

12.5
58.8

15
101

0.0098 +

94.5 x

190.0 x

9500000 N-mm

M .ed +
17998016 +
27498016

0.0982 x

Kailash Builders

12.5
1.8

380.0
190

190.00 mm
25.00 t

= 14.62

14.62
2.138

2.14 x

0.20 x
=

380.0
26.0

k1

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

Stress

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1

2.5

M . R.d
9500000

27498016
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

25.00 x

10000

0.0033

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total flexual stress

1.336 +

2.53 =

3.868 Mpa

<

15.00 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
20

3.87 =
15.00

0.95

<
Hence OK

1.00

Concrete stress at Top Plate


I.Direct bearing stress due to Vertical load (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.1.5)
Stress =

250.00 x
0.785

10000
x 430 ^ 2

<

17.22 Mpa

172.5 Mpa

Hence OK
II.Flexual stress due to active moment resulting from acting horizental force

e =
Stress

22 +
=
=

3 =

25 mm

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
430.0 ^ 3
0.801 Mpa

25

III.Flexural stress due to induced moment resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =
di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

M .ed =
=
=

2)

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)
380.0 mm
2.14
94.508
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

di / he =

380.0
^3 x(
54872000
x 0.328
17998016 N-mm

M . R.d =

190.00 mm

380.0
26.0

= 14.62

k1

14.62
2.138

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.62
94.508

12.5
58.8

15
101

0.0098 +

94.5 x

2.14 x

0.2 x C x H
C=

Kailash Builders

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1

380.0
190

0.0033

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

H=

25.00 t

M . R.d =

0.20 x
=

M .ed +
17998016 +
27498016

=
=
=

0.0982 x

Total flexual stress

25.00 x

10000

9500000 N-mm

Total induced moment =

Stress

190.00 x

3.5

0.801 +

M . R.d
9500000

27498016
430.0 ^ 3
Mpa

3.52 =

4.324 Mpa
<
151.80 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
172.5

Design of Pot Wall

4.32 =
151.80

0.11

<
Hence OK

1.00

( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.3.1.1.7)

Force from Pad

380.00 x

Pressure from Pad ( P1 ) =

26.00 x

22

217791 N ( per one section of ring)

217790.97476
2 x
47.00 x 40.00
57.92 Mpa

Total horizental force on wall =

25.00 t

Total Horizental stress into wall due to horizontal force ( P2 )


=

Total P

=
=
=

25 x
10000
2 x
47.00 x 40.00
66.49 Mpa
P1 + P2
57.92 + 66.49
124.41
Mpa

<
Hence OK

Kailash Builders

168 Mpa
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.2.)

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Seismic Case
Design of Neoprene Pad (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.2.3)
Neoprene pad stress

PTFE stress

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 380 ^ 2

22 Mpa <

250.00
0.785

x 10000
=
x 380 ^ 2

22 Mpa <

35 Mpa

Hence OK

40 Mpa

Hence OK

Concrete stress at Pot Base (IRC-83 part (iii) clause 926.1.5)


I . Direct Bearing stress due to vertical load

=
250.00
0.785

14 Mpa <

x 10000
x 480 ^ 2

25 Mpa

Hence OK

II.Flexural stress due to active resulting from acting horizontal force


Eccentricity

Stress

28 +

26 +

4 =

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
480.0 ^ 3
1.336 Mpa

58

mm

58

III.Flexural stress due to induced resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)

di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

M .ed =
=
=

2)

380.0 mm
2.14
94.508
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

di / he =

380.0
^3 x(
54872000
x 0.328
17998016 N-mm

M . R.d =

380.0
26.0

= 14.62

k1

14.62
2.138

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.62
94.508

12.5
58.8

15
101

0.0098 +

94.5 x

25.00 x

10000

2.14 x

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

M . R.d =

190.00 mm
25.00 t
0.20 x

Kailash Builders

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1

190.00 x

9500000 N-mm

0.0033

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Total induced moment =

M .ed +
17998016 +
27498016

=
=
Stress

=
0.0982 x

Total flexual stress

2.5

1.336 +

M . R.d
9500000

27498016
480.0 ^ 3
Mpa

2.53 =

3.868 Mpa

<

18.75 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
25

3.87 =
19.50

0.75

<
Hence OK

1.00

stress at Top Plate


I.Direct bearing stress due to Vertical load (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.1.5)
Stress =

250.00 x
0.785

10000
x 430 ^ 2

<

17.22 Mpa

172.5 Mpa

Hence OK
II.Flexual stress due to active moment resulting from acting horizontal force

e =
Stress

22 +
=
=

3 =

25 mm

25 x
10000 x
0.0982 x
430.0 ^ 3
0.801 Mpa

25

III.Flexural stress due to induced moment resulting from resistance to Rotation


1) M. e.d. =
di =
k1=
k2 =
p =
v =

Kailash Builders

di^3 x ( k1 .p + k2. v)
380.0 mm
2.14
94.508
0.00975 radian
0.00325 radian

IRC- 83 Part (iii) clause 926.1.5.1


di / he =

380.0
26.0

= 14.62

k1

14.62
2.138

12.5
1.8

15
2.2

k2

14.62
94.508

12.5
58.8

15
101

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

M .ed =
=
=

2)

380.0
^3 x(
54872000
x 0.328
17998016 N-mm

M . R.d =

2.14 x

0.0098 +

94.5 x

25.00 x

10000

0.0033

0.2 x C x H
C=
H=

190.00 mm
25.00 t

M . R.d =

0.20 x
=

9500000 N-mm

Total induced moment =

M .ed +
17998016 +
27498016

=
=
Stress

=
0.0982 x

Total flexual stress

190.00 x

3.5

0.801 +

M . R.d
9500000

27498016
430.0 ^ 3
Mpa

3.52 =

4.324 Mpa
<
151.80 Mpa

Hence OK
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.)
IV.Coexisting direct and Flexural stress check (IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.1.3)

Stress =

13.82
172.5

Design of Pot Wall

4.32 =
151.80

0.11

<
Hence OK

1.00

( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.3.1.1.7)

Force from Pad

380.00 x

Pressure from Pad ( P1 ) =

26.00 x

22

217791 N ( per one section of ring)

217790.97476
2 x
47.00 x 40.00
57.92 Mpa

Total horizental force on wall =

25.00 t

Total Horizental stress into wall due to horizental force ( P2 )


=

Total P

=
=
=

Kailash Builders

25 x
10000
2 x
47.00 x 40.00
66.49 Mpa
P1 + P2
57.92 + 66.49
124.41
Mpa

<

168 Mpa
( IRC-83-iii-clause 926.2.2.)

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Hence OK
MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN CHECKS
Rotation capacity

( IRC-83 part III - clause 926.2.3)

Check compression at edge of Neoprene Pad


Max . Permitted =
=
=

15 % of T
x 22.00
3.3 mm

0.15

Rotation ( Radius )

( T is the thickness of neoprene pad less thick of ring)

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.2.3)

3.3
x 0.5

380
=

0.017 radian

>

0.01 radian

Hence OK
D/ T ratio of Neoprene Pad

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.2.3)


=

380.0
26.0
14.6 Mpa

< 15 Mpa
Hence OK

Vertical face of Piston required


Width =
( Pot dia

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.1.3.1)


1.3 x Seismic H Load x
- 1.50 )

1.30 x
378.50

25.00 x
x 0.75

4.1

<

10000
x 0.75 x 280
10000
x 280
10.00 mm

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Slidling Capacity

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.1.1.6.1)

Slide plate dimension (Rect )

480.00

Effective dia of concrete at top


Preset in Long. Direction
Longitudinal movement
Movement possible in one direction

490.00 mm

430.00 mm
0 mm
480.00 430.00
50.00 0.00
2
50.00 0.00
2

Movement possible in other direction

=
=

50.00 mm
25.0 mm

>

25.0 mm

>

13.0 mm
13.0 mm

Hence OK

Guides
Inside Dimension of slide plate
Length of Piston

490.00 435.00 -

Bolt Design ( Non Seismic )


Total horizontal force

27.50 10.00 -

27.50
5.00

435.00 mm
420.00 mm

=
=

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.6)

25 t

Contribution to resistance by Bolts ( F1 )


Nos of Bolts
Biameter of Bolt
Cross section area
Total cross section area
Shear strenght of bolt Gr 8.8
Shear strenght of bolt Gr 8.8

=
=
=
=
=
=

10
20.00
245.00
2450.0
190
190

Total shear force offer by the Bolts ( F1 ) =

nos
mm
mm
mm
Mpa
Mpa ( Seismic case )

2450.00
x 190
10000
46.6 t ( Non -Seismic Case)

2450.00
x 190
10000
46.6 t ( Seismic Case)

Total shear force offer by the Bolts ( F1 ) =

Contribution to resistance by Friction ( F2 )


Vertical load ( min)

0 t ( Non-seismic )

Vertical load ( min)

0 t ( Seismic )

Co-efficient of friction between concrete and steel

0.2

Friction Force ( F2 )

0 x

0 =

0 t( Non-seismic case )

Friction Force ( F2 )

0 x

0 =

0 t ( Seismic case )

Total resistance offered =

46.6 +

0 =

Kailash Builders

46.6 t

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

> 25.00 t
Hence OK

( Non seismic case )

Total resistance offered =


( Seismic case )

46.6 +

46.6 t

> 25.00 t
Hence OK

DOWEL DESIGN
Dia =
Length =

0 =

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.6.5)


50 mm
190 mm

Non-seismic case and Seismic case


Horizental force over Dowel by Bolt
=
3 x
245 x
Stress =

190 =

139650.00
50 x
190

139650 N

14.70 Mpa
< 15.00 Mpa

Hence OK
Stress in Guide Bar

(Non Seismic )

Shear stress

25.00 x 10000
27.50 x 360.00

Eccentricity
Moment

5 +
25.00 x

Flexual stress

0.5 x
10000 x

25 Mpa

15 =
12.5 =

<
126 Mpa
Hence OK

12.5 mm
3125000 N-mm

M
x
6
L x H^ 2

=
=

360.00 x
69 Mpa

3125000 x 6
27.50 ^ 2

<

168 Mpa

Hence OK
Combine stress at the Top Plate Guide Bar inter face

4743.1

82 Mpa

1913.07

<

252 Mpa

Hence OK

Stress in Guide Bar

( Seismic )

Shear stress

25.00 x 10000
27.50 x 360.00

Eccentricity
Moment

5 +
25.00 x

Kailash Builders

0.5 x
10000 x

25 Mpa

15 =
12.5 =

<
126 Mpa
Hence OK

12.5 mm
3125000 N-mm

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Flexual stress

M
x
6
L x H^ 2

=
=

360.00 x
69 Mpa

3125000 x 6
27.50 ^ 2

<

168 Mpa

Hence OK
Combine stress at the Top Plate Guide Bar inter face

4743.1

82 Mpa

1913.07

<

252 Mpa

Hence OK
POT INTERFACE

( IRC-83 part -III - clause 926.3.1.1.7)

Non - Seismic
Shear stress at cylinder and base interface considering 1mm slice
Fluid Pressure ( P1 )

=
=
=

Horizental force ( P2) =


=
=

Total stress

Kailash Builders

he x cc
bp
26.0 x 22.04
40.00
14.33
Mpa
1.5
di
1.5 x
380.0 x
24.671

14.33 +

x H
x bp
250000
40.00
Mpa

24.67 =

39.0 Mpa

< 126 Mpa


Hence OK

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Seismic
Shear stress at cylinder and base interface considering 1mm slice
Fluid Pressure ( P1 )

he x cc
bp
26.0 x 22.04
40.00
14.33
Mpa

=
=
=

Horizental force ( P2) =

1.5
di
1.5 x
380.0 x
24.671

=
=

Total stress

14.33 +

x H
x bp
250000
40.00
Mpa

24.67 =

39.0 Mpa

< 126 Mpa


Hence OK

Bearing stress at cylinder and base interface 1mm slice


Non-seismic case
Fluid pressuse( P1 )

Horizental force (P2)

6 x cc x he^
2 x
bp ^

6.0 x
2.0 x

Total stress

22.0 x 676.0
1600.00

27.9 Mpa

1.5 x

1.5 x

6.0 x H x ha
di x bp ^ 2
6.0 x
380.0 x

19309.888928

154.50809036 <

27.9 +

4562.86105982
252

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

250000 x 30.00
1600.00

111.0 Mpa

111.0 =

combine stressat cylindrical base interface considering 1mm slice


=

2
2

139.0 Mpa

<
185 Mpa
Hence OK

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Seismic case
Fluid pressuse( P1 )

6 x cc x he^
2 x
bp ^

6.0 x
2.0 x

Horizental force (P2)

22.0 x 676.0
1600.00

27.9 Mpa

1.5 x

1.5 x

Total stress

2
2

6.0 x H x ha
di x bp ^ 2
6.0 x
380.0 x

250000 x 30.00
1600.00

111.0 Mpa

27.9 +

111.0 =

139.0 Mpa

<
185 Mpa
Hence OK

combine stressat cylindrical base interface considering 1mm slice


=

19309.9

4562.86105982

154.51 <

252
Hence OK

Stress into Lugs because of Horizontal force


Non-Seismic case
Total horizontal force on bearing
Effective length of Lug taking shear

=
=

3.0 x

Thickness of Lug

Total cross sectional area of Lug


(Each Lug)

Total nos of Lug in each bearin

Horizental force on each Lug

Stress on Lug due to Horizental force

Kailash Builders

25 t
20.0 =

60 mm

16.00 mm
60.0 x

16.0 =

960 mm^2

12 nos
25
12

2t

20833.333333
960

= 22 Mpa

<

126 Mpa

Hence OK

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Seismic case
Total horizental force on bearing

Effective length of Lug taking shear

3.0 x

Thickness of Lug

Total cross sectional area of Lug


(Each Lug)

Total nos of Lug in each bearin

Horizental force on each Lug

Stress on Lug due to Horizental force

25 t
20.0 =

60 mm

16.00 mm
60.0 x

16.0 =

960 mm^2

10 nos

25.00
10

3t

25000
960

= 26 Mpa

<

126 Mpa

Hence OK

Check for thickness of Piston in bending : Top


Maximum Vertical load
Effective dia of Piston

=
=

250.00 t
430.00 mm

Effective area of the Top plate which contact with concrete


=
3.142 x
430.000 ^ 2
4
=
145220.1 mm^2
Stress on Top Plate

250.000 x 10000
145220.1

17.2 Mpa

Diameter of loaded area (Pad) =


Projection of piston

380.0 mm

430.00

Bending moment on the Top Plate =

380.0

25.0 mm

17.2 x

25.0^ 2

2
5379.76 N-mm

Thickness of Top Plate reqd to cater the B.M. =

5379.76
1 x
=

13.2 mm

6
184.8

<

24 mm

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

Design of Bearings for Gangnani Bridge

Check for thickness of pot in bending : Bottom


Maximum Vertical load
Effective dia of Piston

=
=

250.00 t
480.00 mm

Effective area of the Bottom plate which contact with concrete


=
3.142 x
480.000 ^ 2
4
=
180955.7 mm^2
Stress on Bot Plate

250.000 x 10000
180955.7

13.8 Mpa

Diameter of loaded area (Pad) =


Projection of piston

380.0 mm

480.00

Bending moment on the Bot Plate =

380.0

50.0 mm

13.8 x

50.0^ 2

2
17269.42 N-mm

Thickness of bottom Plate reqd to cater the B.M. =

17269.42
1 x
=

23.7 mm

6
184.8

<

28 mm

Hence OK

Kailash Builders

You might also like