Metro General Survey Results Presentation

Los Angeles County Transportation
Long Range Plan Issues Survey

Survey Conducted:
March 17-29, 2015
220-4101
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings
Support for both measures is initially strong and the
intensity of support those saying definitely yes increases
for both measures after education.
Self-reported likely November 2016 voters are less
supportive of the measures and many of their individual
features than all County residents. However, support
among self-reported likely November 2016 voters appears
relatively strong.
The Augmentation/Extension Measure is susceptible to
a simple explanation of what the measure actually does,
after which support drops to below two-thirds.
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings Continued

To be successful, a measure must include funds for a
package of local roads, freeways and public
transportation improvements.
Specifically: freeway improvements; traffic congestion
relief; keeping fares low for seniors, the disabled and
students; earthquake retrofitting bridges and tunnels;
and pothole repairs and local street paving top the list
of many important features.
Selecting voter-preferred individual regional projects
can make a difference in passing the measure.
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings Continued

Concern about the growing population of drivers and the
desire for traffic congestion relief are top reasons why
all residents and self-reported definite voters would be more
inclined to vote yes on a measure.
Metro continues to have more favorable ratings among

all residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters
than the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Methodology
Conducted a Random Digit Dial Survey by telephone
(landlines and cell phones) between March 17th March
29th, 2015
Interviews with 1,414 Los Angeles County residents ages 18
years or older
Survey was available in English and Spanish
Some percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding
Margin of error for the full sample is +/- 2.6% and half the
sample is
+/-3.3%
Margin of error for each Metro Planning Area is +/-6.9% and
half sample is +/-9.8%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Methodology Continued
Margin of error for self-reported registered voters
likely to vote in the November 2016 General Election
(n=863) is +/-3.4% and half sample is +/-4.8%
Note: This sample of self-reported registered likely
Nov 2016 voters is different from a typical voter
population, which is based on actual registration
information and voter history.
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
METRO Planning Areas

Sample Actual %
Size of County
Planning Area
Largest Cities in the Area
Westside
City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica,

West Hollywood, Culver City and Beverly Hills
200
13%
South Bay
City of Los Angeles, Torrance, Carson,

Inglewood, Redondo Beach and
unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County
201
14%
Central
City of Los Angeles
204
10%
San Gabriel Valley
Pasadena, Pomona, West Covina, Alhambra,

Arcadia, Diamond Bar, El Monte, Glendora and
201
19%
San Fernando Valley
Burbank, Calabasas, Glendale,

La Canada/Flintridge, City of Los Angeles,
San Fernando, Unincorporated
202
18%
North County
Lancaster, City of Los Angeles,

Palmdale, Santa Clarita, Unincorporated
205
7%
Southeast
Long Beach, Downey, Lakewood,

Norwalk, Compton, Cerritos, Bellflower,
Pico Rivera, South Gate, Whittier and
201
19%
1414
100%
Total
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Ballot Summary for the -cent Sales Tax

Augmentation/Extension Measure
Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve
the Los Angeles County transportation system, provide traffic
congestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending
light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems in
Los Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schools
and local airports; improving freeway and local street traffic
flow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local
signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;
approval augments by one-half cent and extends the existing
County sales tax, with independent financial audits, and
citizen oversight; all funds controlled locally?
Q7. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
Brief Explanation of the

Augmentation/Extension Measure
In 2008, Los Angeles County voters approved a
one-half cent traffic relief sales tax for 30 years.
The measure I just described would make that
sales tax permanent and increase the county
transportation sales tax by one-half cent.
Seventy percent of self-reported likely voters initially

say they would vote yes on the augmentation/extension
measure. While support drops to below the two-thirds
threshold after receiving a brief explanation of the measure,
support exceeds initial vote after more education.
Def. Yes
Prob. Yes
Initial Vote
Und./ Lean Yes
Und./Lean No
46%
Vote After Explanation
20%
36%
Final Vote After Information
22%
49%
0%
20%
Prob. No
60%
Und.
15%
7%
10%
25%
40%
Def. No
19%
5%
80%
6%
Total Total
Yes No
5%
70% 25%
6%
63% 31%
79% 18%
9%
100%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Q7/Q8/Q15 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to
oppose it? Split Sample
10
Ballot Summary for the -cent Sales Tax

Increase Measure
Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve the
Los Angeles County transportation system, provide traffic
congestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending
light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems in
Los Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schools
and local airports; improving freeway and local street traffic
flow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local
signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;
approval increases the County sales tax by one-half cent, with
independent financial audits and citizen oversight; all funds
controlled locally?
11
Seventy-two percent of self-reported likely November

2016 voters initially support the -cent sales tax increase
measure, and overall support remains stable after
education, with definitely yes voters increasing by 6%.
Def. Yes
Prob. Yes
Initial Vote
Und./ Lean Yes
Und./Lean No
42%
Final Vote After Information
26%
48%
0%
20%
Prob. No
23%
40%
60%
Def. No
5% 7%
5%
Und.
Total Total
Yes No
13% 7% 72% 21%
17%
80%
5%
73% 23%
100%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Q9/Q16 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to
oppose it? Split Sample
12
All three major areas of transportation investment

are considered the top priority by between roughly
one-quarter to one-third of respondents, respectively.
Self-Reported Likely
November 2016 Voters
All Residents
(B) Local street and road
improvements
35%
32%
(C) Freeway and highway

improvements
(A) Local and regional light
rail and bus transportation
improvements
27%
30%
24%
25%
Both A and B, A and C,

B and C/All
12%
10%
None of them/Other/DK/NA
3%
1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Q10 (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). I am going to read you three uses of existing transportation funding in LA County. Please tell
me which one is your top priority for transportation funding.
13
Potential Transportation Features

by Metro Planning Area
(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure - 6 or 7 rating)
Features
All
Westside
Residents
South
Bay
Central SGV SFV
North
Southeast
County
Earthquake retrofitting bridges,

tunnels and overpasses
81%
81%
81%
77%
83% 83%
75%
83%
Improving freeway traffic flow on the 5,

10, 14, 60, 101, 110, 138, 210, 405,
605 and the 710 freeways
80%
78%
78%
78%
83% 83%
70%
79%
Keeping seniors, disabled

and student fares low
79%
70%
79%
78%
84% 80%
84%
81%
Preventing polluted toxic roadway runoff

from entering storm drains and flowing
into creeks, rivers and coastal waters
and onto County beaches
79%
83%
82%
84%
77% 72%
80%
83%
Repairing potholes and

repaving local streets
79%
78%
76%
86%
77% 76%
81%
83%
Improving freeway traffic flow
78%
80%
77%
80%
73% 75%
85%
82%
Continuing to advance and improve the

Los Angeles County transportation
system to provide traffic congestion relief
75%
77%
69%
81%
79% 66%
86%
76%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention some
features of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me how
important it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL
IMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample
14
Continued
(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)
Features
All
Westside
Residents
South
Bay
Central SGV SFV
North
Southeast
County
Widening freeways to improve traffic flow
75%
62%
71%
83%
82% 75%
82%
73%
Improving connections to jobs,

schools and local airports
72%
77%
72%
77%
71% 61%
63%
80%
Improving safety on buses and light rail

lines, and at bus stops and rail stations
70%
73%
80%
79%
73% 49%
71%
72%
Improving van service for seniors,

the disabled and veterans
70%
57%
64%
75%
73% 68%
75%
79%
Improving freeway safety
70%
53%
82%
73%
68% 63%
71%
79%
Adding and upgrading crosswalks

and sidewalks to improve
student and pedestrian safety
70%
64%
64%
78%
69% 68%
73%
74%
Synchronizing signals in
every area of the County
68%
63%
68%
65%
65% 68%
63%
79%
Reducing diesel emissions from

trucks and trains
67%
60%
66%
80%
72% 53%
61%
78%
Continuing to advance and improve the

Los Angeles County transportation system
to help economic and job growth
66%
63%
61%
73%
68% 61%
67%
73%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
15
Continued
Features
All
Westside
Residents
South
Bay
Central SGV SFV
North
Southeast
County
Improving safety at rail crossings
65%
58%
59%
78%
65% 58%
76%
71%
Improving the flow and safety of truck

traffic on freeways and roads near the
Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach
64%
59%
58%
66%
63% 65%
71%
71%
Connecting public transit to

LAX, Burbank, Long Beach
and Palmdale airports
64%
61%
57%
80%
55% 70%
73%
65%
Upgrading freeway on- and

off-ramps to improve traffic flow
64%
66%
49%
78%
60% 56%
72%
73%
Synchronizing local signals
64%
60%
69%
71%
58% 64%
56%
71%
Upgrading and redesigning local streets

to balance motorist concerns with better
and safer access for pedestrians,
bicycles and bus travel
63%
64%
60%
72%
63% 56%
64%
68%
Extending light rail, subway and bus

service in Los Angeles County
63%
59%
63%
71%
68% 51%
55%
69%
Extending the light rail system

to more places in the County
62%
59%
61%
65%
68% 51%
66%
65%
Improving and expanding

Metrolink service
61%
54%
58%
73%
65% 48%
66%
67%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
16
Continued
Features
All
Westside
Residents
South
Bay
Central SGV SFV
North
Southeast
County
Improving opportunities for getting from

public transportation stops and stations
to your final destination, by improving
pedestrian, bike and
neighborhood shuttle services
61%
61%
60%
72%
65% 52%
63%
61%
Creating a safe network of

bicycle paths, physically separated
from motor vehicle traffic
61%
62%
54%
73%
62% 52%
59%
67%
Adding carpool lanes on local freeways
58%
55%
52%
53%
53% 58%
61%
74%
Expanding bus service, including

adding more Rapid Buses
58%
46%
57%
63%
59% 63%
58%
59%
Improving frequency of and

connections to bus service
57%
50%
56%
77%
60% 45%
60%
59%
Establishing and improving

Express Bus Service on freeways
56%
43%
67%
64%
65% 49%
55%
52%
Establishing and improving

neighborhood shuttles
55%
51%
58%
59%
56% 53%
63%
51%
Building more Park and

Ride lots at transit stations
48%
42%
49%
58%
43% 48%
50%
52%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
17
West Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016

voters are more likely to vote for the measure if the Crenshaw LAX Light
Rail Line is extended and traffic flow on the 10 freeway is improved.
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Much More Lkly.
Extending the Metro

Crenshaw LAX Rail Line,
which is currently under
construction, to the Metro
Purple Line on Wilshire and
through West Hollywood to the
Metro Red Line in Hollywood
Improving the traffic flow along

the 10 freeway between the
405 freeway and downtown LA
by widening the road at key
bottlenecks and upgrading the
on- and off-ramps
Smwt. More Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
44%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
No Diff.
29%
42%
0%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. Less Lkly.
29%
DK/NA
18%
74% 5%
21%
71% 6%
47%
27%
44%
35%
5%
60%
80%
20%
40%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
18%
5%
73% 7%
13% 79% 7%
100%
Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like
to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be
funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 West Los Angeles County) 18
West Los Angeles Continued

Much More Lkly.
Connecting LAX to the

San Fernando Valley by a subway
line under the Sepulveda Pass
Extending the Metro Purple Line

Subway, currently under
construction, beyond UCLA and
Westwood toward Santa Monica
Connecting LAX to the San

Fernando Valley by a subway line
under the Sepulveda Pass. This
would be funded partially by a
new toll Express Lane travelling
along the 405 from LAX to the
Valley in both directions
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
38%
Nov 2016 Voters
37%
19% 13%
All Residents
35%
27%
Nov 2016 Voters
35%
25%
24%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
16%
26%
No Diff.
All Residents
0%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Much Less Lkly.
28%
38%
20%
40%
8%
DK/NA
26%
64% 8%
27%
56% 16%
30%
6%
15%
60%
62% 5%
60% 10%
27%
11%11% 21%
7%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
21%
80%
5%
52% 22%
54% 22%
100%
Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now
like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will
be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 West Los Angeles
County)
19
South Bay residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more
probable to vote for the measure if it improves traffic flow on major streets in
the area, and local street maintenance and traffic flow along the 405 freeway.
Much More Lkly.
Improving street maintenance,

such as pothole repair, on
major streets throughout the
South Bay
Removing key bottlenecks and
improving traffic flow on Pacific
Coast Highway, Hawthorne and
Crenshaw Boulevards, and
Western Avenue
Improving traffic along the 405
freeway between the 105 and
the 110 freeways by widening
the road at key bottlenecks and
upgrading the on- and off-ramps
Extending the Metro Green
Light Rail Line south towards
San Pedro through Redondo
Beach and Torrance
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
No Diff.
All Residents
54%
25%
Nov 2016 Voters
53%
24%
All Residents
51%
27%
Nov 2016 Voters
47%
5%
28%
DK/NA
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
14%
78% 5%
12%
77% 8%
16%
78% 4%
15%
75% 6%
All Residents
55%
20%
6%
13%
75% 8%
Nov 2016 Voters
56%
17%
7%
13%
73% 10%
6% 6%
14%
69% 12%
All Residents
44%
Nov 2016 Voters
42%
0%
20%
25%
20%
40%
5% 7%
60%
23%
80%
62% 12%
100%
Q13 f-i (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like
funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 2 The South Bay)
20
Central Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016

voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it extends the Crenshaw
LAX Light Rail Line; improves freeway connections in Downtown; and
extends the northbound bus and carpool lane on the 110 freeway.
Much More Lkly.
Extending the Metro Crenshaw

LAX Light Rail Line, which is
currently under construction, to
the Metro Purple Line on Wilshire
and through West Hollywood to
the Metro Red Line in Hollywood
Improving freeway connections
around Downtown Los Angeles
on the 5, 10, 60 and 101 freeways
through East LA
Extending the northbound bus and
carpool lane on the 110 freeway
past the current bottleneck at
Adams Boulevard into Downtown
LA, thereby improving traffic flow,
reducing congestion and
improving safety
Establishing frequent bus service
along Vermont Avenue that
operates in its own dedicated
lane with fewer stops; connecting
South Los Angeles with the
Metro Red Line and Purple Line
subway at Wilshire and Vermont
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
55%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
28%
58%
Nov 2016 Voters
Nov 2016 Voters
17%
48%
Nov 2016 Voters
34%
0%
20%
40%
15%
5%
67% 10%
76% 6%
71% 9%
17%
22%
6%
20%
22%
6%
20% 8% 66% 6%
17%
44%
All Residents
17%
6%
23%
54%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
11% 80% 7%
18%
44%
All Residents
DK/NA
24%
39%
All Residents
No Diff.
7% 5%
6%
16%
8% 8%
22%
60%
80%
62% 10%
69% 12%
6%
56% 16%
100%
Q13 j-m (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like
funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 3 Central Los Angeles County) 21
Within each respective group, there are no statistical differences

in the likelihood of voting with respect to each San Gabriel Valley
project, with one exception - upgrading the 71 Freeway scores
lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.
Much More Lkly.
Extending the Metro Gold Light

Rail Line further east from East LA
along the 60 freeway towards the
605 freeway in South El Monte
Connecting North Hollywood,

Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena
by light rail
Rail Line which is currently under
construction to Azusa, further east
through Glendora and San Dimas
toward Claremont
Upgrading the 71 freeway from a

four- and six-lane expressway to
an eight-lane freeway between
Mission Boulevard and the
60 freeway in Pomona
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
52%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
48%
All Residents
49%
Nov 2016 Voters
19%
21%
21%
48%
Nov 2016 Voters
19%
42%
23%
49%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
17%
43%
0%
20%
DK/NA
17%
6%
71% 6%
18% 7% 19% 7% 66% 8%
41%
All Residents
No Diff.
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
20%
70% 7%
11% 16%
7%
22%
5%
67% 7%
6%
65% 13%
7%
66% 8%
5%
8% 5% 16%
20%
62% 15%
14% 8% 9% 17% 8% 57% 18%

40%
60%
80%
100%
Q13 n-q (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like
funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 4 San Gabriel Valley)
22
San Fernando Valley residents and self-reported likely November

2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it improves
traffic flow on the 101 freeway and connects the San Fernando Valley
to LAX by a subway line under the Sepulveda Pass.
Much More Lkly.
Improving the traffic flow along

the 101 freeway between the
Ventura County line and the
Hollywood Freeway in
Universal City by widening the
road at key bottlenecks and
upgrading the on- and off-ramps
Smwt. More Lkly.
53%
Nov 2016 Voters
53%
23%
50%
29%
Nov 2016 Voters
20%
No Diff.
27%
42%
0%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Much Less Lkly.
All Residents
All Residents
Connecting the San Fernando

Valley to LAX by a subway line
under the Sepulveda Pass
Smwt. Less Lkly.
DK/NA
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
9%
80% 7%
17%
76% 6%
14% 79% 7%
16% 11% 12% 18%

40%
60%
80%
59% 23%
100%
Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now
be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 San Fernando Valley)
23
San Fernando Valley Continued

Much More Lkly.
Connecting the
San Fernando Valley to LAX
by a subway line under the
Sepulveda Pass. This would
be funded partially by a new
toll Express Lane travelling
along the 405 from the Valley
to LAX in both directions
Converting the Metro Orange
Line Busway to a light rail line
connecting Woodland Hills,
North Hollywood, the Burbank
Airport, Pasadena and the
Greater San Gabriel Valley
Creating a dedicated light rail
along Van Nuys Boulevard
connecting Sylmar and
Van Nuys Civic Center
through the communities of
Panorama City, Pacoima and
the of San Fernando
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
49%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
28%
56%
Nov 2016 Voters
33%
37%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
31%
0%
20%
21%
21%
DK/NA
14%
19%
44%
All Residents
No Diff.
7% 7%
16%
25%
19% 8% 7%
23%
40%
60%
36%
80%
77% 16%
75% 20%
18%
8% 10%
12% 8% 11%
5%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
5%
65% 13%
53% 18%
5%
56% 15%
43% 18%
100%
Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now
be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 San Fernando Valley)
24
Within each respective group, there are no statistical

differences in the likelihood of voting with respect to each
North County project, with one exception improving
streets near the hospital and medical buildings scores
lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.
Much More Lkly.
Improving the traffic flow

along the I-5 freeway in Santa
Clarita, Newhall and Castaic
by widening the road at key
bottlenecks and upgrading
the on- and off-ramps north
of the 5 and 14 interchange
Building a new highway, also

known as the High Desert
Corridor, between the
14 freeway in Palmdale and
15 freeway in Victorville,
which would be located north
of the 138 through Palmdale,
Littlerock, Sun Village and
Lake Los Angeles
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
51%
All Residents
21%
Nov 2016 Voters
42%
26%
All Residents
41%
30%
Nov 2016 Voters
36%
0%
20%
No Diff.
30%
40%
5%
5%
18%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
5%
72% 8%
6%
68% 7%
15%
10% 14%
7%
60%
DK/NA
71% 11%
17% 8% 67% 8%
80%
100%
Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now
be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 North County) (N=205)
25
North County Continued

Much More Lkly.
Improving existing streets and

constructing new streets to
the regional Antelope Valley
Hospital and surrounding medical
facilities in Lancaster to increase
access for emergency vehicles,
patients and visitors
Improving the traffic flow along the

14 freeway by widening the road
at key bottlenecks, including
improving the Avenue S bridge
in Palmdale and upgrading the onand off-ramps north of the I-5 and
14 interchange in Canyon Country
Smwt. More Lkly.
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
No Diff.
44%
27%
7%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
36%
47%
All Residents
Nov 2016 Voters
20%
6%
20%
41%
0%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
19%
25%
40%
60%
DK/NA
5%
70% 10%
16%
28%
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
10% 55%
18%
7%
8%
66% 8%
20% 8% 67% 6%
80%
100%
Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now
be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 North County) (N=205)
26
Southeast Los Angeles County residents and self-reported

likely November 2016 voters are more likely to support the
measure if it adds a carpool and a regular lane on the 5 freeway,
improves traffic flow along the 710 freeway and constructs a
light rail line from downtown to the Orange County line.
Much More Lkly.
Smwt. More Lkly.
Adding a carpool and a regular

All Residents
lane on the 5 freeway between
the 605 and the 710 freeways Self-Reported Likely
through Commerce and Downey
Nov 2016 Voters
Improving the traffic flow along the
710 freeway by widening the road
at key bottlenecks and upgrading
All Residents
the on- and off-ramps between
downtown LA and the Ports of Self-Reported Likely
Los Angeles and Long Beach
Nov 2016 Voters
through such southeast cities as
Bell, South Gate and Paramount
Constructing a light rail line from
All Residents
downtown LA to the Orange
County Line through Paramount, Self-Reported Likely
Nov 2016 Voters
Bellflower and Cerritos
Rail Line to East Los Angeles
All Residents
further east toward Whittier along
Washington Boulevard through Self-Reported Likely
Commerce, Pico Rivera, and
Nov 2016 Voters
Montebello
0%
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Smwt. Less Lkly.
Much Less Lkly.
53%
22%
49%
DK/NA
12% 6% 76% 6%
23%
57%
5% 5%
23%
49%
23%
50%
19%
36%
29%
43%
40%
5%
5%
7%
14% 5% 72% 8%
68% 11%
17%
31%
60%
79% 9%
13% 75% 9%
23%
13%
9%
12% 5% 75% 8%
26%
52%
20%
No Diff.
Total Total
More Less
Lkly. Lkly.
80%
7%
64% 6%
6%
57% 7%
100%
Q13 aa-dd (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would
now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or
service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 7 Southeast
Los Angeles County) (N=201)
27
For more information, contact:
John Fairbank
Richard Bernard
John@FM3Research.com
Bernard@FM3Research.com
12100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 350

Los Angeles, CA 90025
Phone (310) 828-1183
Fax (310) 453-6562
28

Metro General Survey Results Presentation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Metro General Survey Results Presentation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Los Angeles County Transportation

Long Range Plan Issues Survey

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

Metro continues to have more favorable ratings among

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

METRO Planning Areas

Largest Cities in the Area

City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica,

City of Los Angeles, Torrance, Carson,

City of Los Angeles

San Gabriel Valley

Pasadena, Pomona, West Covina, Alhambra,

San Fernando Valley

Burbank, Calabasas, Glendale,

Lancaster, City of Los Angeles,

Long Beach, Downey, Lakewood,

Ballot Summary for the -cent Sales Tax

Brief Explanation of the

Seventy percent of self-reported likely voters initially

Und./ Lean Yes

Vote After Explanation

Final Vote After Information

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Ballot Summary for the -cent Sales Tax

Seventy-two percent of self-reported likely November

Und./ Lean Yes

Final Vote After Information

13% 7% 72% 21%

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

All three major areas of transportation investment

(C) Freeway and highway

Both A and B, A and C,

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Potential Transportation Features

Central SGV SFV

Earthquake retrofitting bridges,

Improving freeway traffic flow on the 5,

Keeping seniors, disabled

Preventing polluted toxic roadway runoff

Repairing potholes and

Improving freeway traffic flow

Continuing to advance and improve the

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Central SGV SFV

Widening freeways to improve traffic flow

Improving connections to jobs,

Improving safety on buses and light rail

Improving van service for seniors,

Improving freeway safety

Adding and upgrading crosswalks

Reducing diesel emissions from

Continuing to advance and improve the

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Central SGV SFV

Improving safety at rail crossings

Improving the flow and safety of truck

Connecting public transit to

Upgrading freeway on- and