Sop Iii-002 R00

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

(Company Confidential)
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 1 of 38
Evaluation of Pipe Body

Imperfections

FOR
EVALUATION OF PIPE BODY IMPERFECTIONS
NOTE: This document is considered COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL and is not to be distributed

in whole or in part outside the Company, without the express, written consent of the
undersigned authority.
PROCEDURE APPROVAL: ___________________________ DATE: _____________

Vice President Inspection & Coating Product Line
PROCEDURE APPROVAL: ___________________________ DATE: ______________

Director Quality & Technical Services
Copyright 2005 Tuboscope, P.O. Box 808, Houston, Texas 77001

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 2 of 38

Imperfections
INTRODUCTION
The intent of this document is to provide a general operating guide for Tuboscope evaluation
of imperfections detected in used drill pipe. The procedural methods to be adhered to while
conducting an examination of imperfections occurring in used drill pipe tubular goods have
been detailed within this document. Inspectors charged with responsibility for an inspection
service must use the methods and procedures outlined herein are strictly adhered to during
the imperfection prove-up process. Utilization of this document will require a thorough
understanding of the content by the user.
Information and/or specifications contained in this document meet or exceed those minimum
applicable pipe imperfection prove-up requirements defined in API published Standards as
interpreted by Tuboscope. This document does not replace API Recommended Practices as
a reference source nor does it take precedence over API published documents or Customer
Specifications in the case of a dispute.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 3 of 38


Imperfections
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Scope............................................................................................................................................ 5
Personnel Requirements.............................................................................................................. 6
Compliance With Prove-up Specifications................................................................................... 6
Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... 6
Equipment Requirements............................................................................................................. 7
5.5 Visible Light Sources.......................................................................................................... 7
5.16 Equipment Calibration........................................................................................................ 9
6.0 General Requirements 9
6.1 Prove-up Rack Spacing ..................................................................................................... 9
6.2 Prove-up Rack Height ........................................................................................................ 9
6.3 Types of Grinding ............................................................................................................... 9
6.3.1 Exploratory............................................................................................................ 9
6.3.2 Smoothing Exploratory Grinding ........................................................................ 10
7.0 Location and Evaluation of Buggy Unit Indications...............................................................10
7.2 Evaluation of External Indications ...............................................................................10
7.3 Evaluation of Internal Indications ................................................................................11
8.0 Location and Evaluation of Automated Unit Indications........................................................12
8.7 Drill Pipe Body Indications (Except for FLUT Indications)............................................... 12
8.8 Critical/Slip Area External Indications .............................................................................. 13
8.9 Critical/Slip Area Internal Indications ............................................................................... 13
8.10 FLUT Indications .............................................................................................................. 13
8.10.3 For Ferromagnetic Materials .............................................................................. 14
8.10.4 For Non Ferromagnetic Materials....................................................................... 14
9.0 Evaluation and Disposition of Outside Surface Imperfections................................................... 15
9.2 Cracks............................................................................................................................... 15
9.3 Depth Measurement of Imperfections.............................................................................. 15
9.4 Determination of Remaining Body Wall (RBW)............................................................... 16
9.5 Exploration........................................................................................................................ 16
10.0 Evaluation and Disposition of Internal Surface Imperfections ................................................... 17
10.3 Visual Verification of Internal Cracks ............................................................................... 17
10.3.1 Optiscope Procedures ........................................................................................ 18
10.3.2 Imperfection Size Chart ...................................................................................... 18
11.0 Evaluation and Disposition of Dents or Other Mechanical Damage ......................................... 18
12.0 Post Evaluation Procedures....................................................................................................... 19
Table 7.2.3 1 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 2-3/8 in., 6.65#/ft., 0.280 in................................ 20
Table 7.2.3 2 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 2-7/8 in., 10.40#/ft., 0.362 in.............................. 21
Table 7.2.3 3 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 3-1/2 in., 9.50#/ft., 0.254 in................................ 22
Table 7.2.3 6 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 4 in., 14.00#/ft., 0.330 in. ................................... 25

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 4 of 38

Imperfections
Table 7.2.3 10 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 5 in., 16.25#/ft., 0.296 in. ................................. 29
Table 7.2.3 13 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 5-1/2 in., 21.90#/ft., 0.361 in. .......................... 32
Table 10.3.2 Imperfection Size Chart................................................................................................ 38
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 5 of 38

1.0

Imperfections
SCOPE
1.1
This procedure establishes the minimum requirements for evaluation and

subsequent disposition of pipe body indications located by visual, automated full
body inspection methods (ultrasonic and electromagnetic flux leakage inspection
[EMI]), magnetic particle inspection, liquid penetrant inspection and ultrasonic
inspection. Tubular products covered by this procedure include used drill pipe.
1.2
Evaluation of thread imperfections is not covered in this document. Refer to

SOP III-100.
1.3
This Tuboscope document is the controlling document whenever any other like
kind prior-dated Tuboscope inspection procedures are in conflict.
1.4
The latest revision of the following documents were used as references for
establishing this procedure:
1.4.1 A.P.I. Specification 5D Drill Pipe.
1.4.2 A.P.I. Recommended Practice 7G Recommended Practice for Drill
Stem Design and Operating Limits.
1.4.3 A.P.I. Standard 5T1 Imperfection Terminology.
1.4.4 A.S.T.M. E 1316 Standard Terminology for Nondestructive
Examinations.
1.4.5
SOP III-001 General Requirements.
1.4.6 SOP III-100 Visual and Dimensional Inspection.

1.4.7
SOP III-101 - Tuboscope Optical Instrument.
1.4.8 SOP III-200 Magnetic Particle Inspection.

1.4.9 SOP III-400 Ultrasonic Prove-up.
1.4.10 SOP III-403 Manual Ultrasonic Thickness Gauging.
1.4.11 SOP III-501 Liquid Penetrant Visible Solvent Removable Method.
1.4.12 Standard DS-1 Drill Stem Design and Inspection.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 6 of 38


Imperfections
1.4.13 NS-2 North Sea Drillstring Inspection Standard.

2.0
PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
Personnel performing the evaluation techniques outlined in this procedure shall be
certified, as applicable, in Magnetic Particle Testing, Ultrasonic Testing and/or
Penetrant Testing and qualified in Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge Unit Operation (code
35) in accordance with 4.0 in SOP III-001.
3.0
COMPLIANCE WITH PROVE-UP SPECIFICATIONS

The Inspectors method of performing imperfections prove-up shall comply with the
specifications contained in this document unless customer specifications are provided.
Should customer specifications be provided, a notation will be made on the inspection
report indicating customer designated imperfection prove-up specifications were
followed.
4.0
DEFINITIONS
4.1
Defect. An imperfection of sufficient magnitude to warrant rejection of the

product based on criteria defined in applicable Tuboscope SOP or customer
specification. A.P.I. 5D.
4.2
Discontinuity. A lack of continuity or cohesion; an intentional or unintentional

interruption in the physical structure or configuration of a material or component.
A.S.T.M. E1316.
4.3
Evaluation. A review, following interpretation of the indications noted, to

determine whether they meet specified acceptance criteria. A.S.T.M. E1316.
4.4
Imperfection. A discontinuity in the product wall or on the product surface that

can be detected by the inspection methods contained in this Tuboscope SOP
manual. A.P.I. 5D.
4.5
Indication. The response or evidence from a nondestructive examination. An

indication is determined by interpretation to be relevant, non-relevant, or false.
A.S.T.M. E1316.
4.6
Interpretation.
The determination of whether indications are relevant,
nonrelevant, or false. A.S.T.M. E1316.
4.7
Linear Imperfection. Linear imperfections include, but are not limited to, seams,
laps, cracks, plug scores, cuts and gouges. A.P.I. 5D.

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 7 of 38

Imperfections
4.8
Non-linear Imperfection. A non-linear imperfection includes, but is not limited to,

pits and round bottom die stamping. A.P.I. 5D. They may also be defined as
any imperfection whose length is less than three (3) times its width, such as a
pit. They may also be referred to as a volumetric imperfection.
4.9
Relevant Indication or Imperfection. Any indication or imperfection that has the

potential of being a defect because of its signal amplitude or depth or because it
may reduce the remaining wall thickness to less than specified pipe wall
thickness.
4.10 Specified Wall Thickness. The tabulated material wall thickness corresponding
to either the specified outside diameter and weight or the specified outside
diameter and specified inside diameter.
4.11 Wall Thickness. The actual wall thickness of a tubular product caused by
variations in pipe roundness, cross-section or eccentricity.
5.0
EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS
Fully operational equipment and an adequate level of supplies shall be available at the
job site, except items in 5.3 and 5.7 which may be obtained on an as need basis. The
equipment and/or supplies should comply with applicable Tuboscope Engineering
Specifications, Company Safety Policy, and State or Federal Regulations for Safety.
As a minimum, the following applicable equipment shall be available to locate, explore
and evaluate pipe body imperfections:
5.1
An AC powered blower or air compressor.
5.2
Metal marker (paint marker).
5.3
An optical instrument as defined in SOP III-101, shall be used to aid in the

location/evaluation of internal surface imperfections.
5.3.1
Borescopes shall be capable of displaying the date on a penny, dime or

Jaeger J4 letters placed within 4 inches (10 cm) of the objective lens.
The borescope shall be checked whenever all or part of the borescope is
assembled or re-assembled during the inspection process.
5.4
Wire brush.
5.5
Light Sources. Overhead lighting and hand-held white light fixtures shall meet the
requirements of 9.2 in SOP III-001.

5.6
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 8 of 38

Imperfections
Magnetic particle testing equipment, as defined in SOP III-200, may be used to

aid in the location of imperfections in ferromagnetic material.
5.6.1
An electromagnetic AC or DC yoke with adjustable legs shall be used for

material with an outside diameter of 5 inches (127 mm) or less. Fixed
leg yokes may be used on material with an outside diameter 5-1/2 inches
(140 mm) and larger.
NOTE: A pre-existing or induced longitudinal magnetic field may be used in lieu

of the yoke.
5.6.2
The application of dry magnetic particles to inside surface shall be

through the use of a non-ferrous trough.
5.7
Liquid penetrant testing equipment, as defined in SOP III-501, may be used to

aid in the location of imperfections in non-ferromagnetic material.
5.8
An ultrasonic thickness gauge, as defined in SOP III-403, shall be used to aid in

the location/evaluation of imperfections in ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic
material.
5.9
An ultrasonic flaw detector, as defined in SOP III-400, shall be used to aid in the
location/evaluation of internal surface imperfections in ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic material.
5.10 A grinder and/or a inch (6,4 mm) round file for probing the depth of accessible
imperfections. An additional disk grinder may be required for contouring of
acceptable imperfections and buffing wheels for surface preparation.
5.10.1 A flat file may also be used for removing metal protrusions from the
material surface.
5.10.2 For non-ferrous material, non-metallic grinding wheels shall be used.
5.11 A dial depth gauge for measuring imperfection depth with graduations in 0.001
inch (0,01 mm) or smaller units.
5.11.1 The depth gauge shall be equipped with a conical needle-point contact
with a minimum height of 0.200 inch (5 mm) and a maximum tip diameter
of 0.025 inch (6,4 mm).
5.12 An outside micrometer for measuring applicable pipe or upset outside diameters.
The micrometer shall have graduations in 0.001 inch (0,01 mm) or smaller units

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 9 of 38

Imperfections
with contacts which are flat or rounded.

5.13 A steel rule with graduations in 1/64 inch (0, 5 mm) or smaller units.
5.14 A flat non-tinted mirror which provides a non-distorted image. The reflecting
surface shall be kept clean.
5.15 O.D. and I.D. spring calipers may be used to determine the pipe or upset
diameters. The contacts of the calipers shall be flat.
5.16 Equipment Calibration. Equipment calibration / verification shall be in
accordance with 9.1 in SOP III-001.
5.16.1 Dial depth gauges, micrometers and calipers shall be calibrated, after
any repairs and at the frequency specified in Table 9.1 in SOP III-100.
5.16.2 The micrometer end measuring rods and the lifting power of
electromagnetic yokes shall be verified after any repair and at the
frequency specified in Table 9.1 in SOP III-100.
5.17 All precision measuring/testing equipment and reference standards shall be
exposed to the same ambient temperature as the pipe surface for a minimum of
30 minutes prior to any examination(s).
6.0
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
When applicable, all reject information from automated inspection system prove-up
reports and end area inspections shall be transferred to a defect summary sheet and
masterlog. This information is to be included in the formal report to the customer and
shall become a permanent record to be kept on file for later reference.
6.1
Prove-up Rack Spacing. Space should be available for rolling the pipe and
walking between the adequately secured pipe. Enough space for at least three (3)
complete rotations of the pipe should be adequate, in most cases.
6.2
Prove-Up Rack Height. A quality and accurate prove-up examination can be

performed when the pipe is at a convenient height for observing ID and OD
imperfections.
6.3
Types of Grinding
6.3.1
Exploratory. Exploratory grinding should be round bottomed. To avoid

over-grinding, leave some trace of the imperfection across the bottom of

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 10 of 38

Imperfections
the grind.
6.3.2
7.0
Smoothing Exploratory Grinds. Contour all exploratory grinds with

generous radii in acceptable pipe. Also, all grinds in acceptable pipe
should be coated with rust inhibitor.
LOCATION AND EVALUATION OF BUGGY UNIT INDICATIONS

7.1
7.2
As the buggy is traversed down the length of drill pipe and a suspect indication
appears on the log or display, the operator must stop the buggy and prove-up the
indication immediately. After the buggy is stopped, the flaw lights (when
applicable) on the desk can be used for approximate location of the indication.
7.1.1
Using a marker, mark the shoe location on the pipe that corresponds to
the desk light.
7.1.2
Remove the buggy from the length.
Evaluation of External Indications

7.2.1
Visually examine the external surface of the questionable area for obvious
imperfections.
7.2.2
If the imperfection is determined to be large enough to down grade such

as a pit, gouge, formation cut, slip cut or other visual surface condition,
determine the depth using a depth gauge and the adjacent wall thickness
using an ultrasonic instrument in accordance with 9.3 and 9.4.
7.2.3
Refer to the applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through 7.2.3 18 for classification.
7.2.4
In the absence of obvious external surface imperfections, dry magnetic

particle inspection must be performed. With the buggy mag coil in the
"ON", positioned and placed approximately 6 to 12 inches (15 to 30 cm)
from the marked area, lightly sprinkle dry magnetic particles over the
suspect area. Using your hand, smooth the particles across the area. If
the suspect imperfection is on the external surface, the powder will
accumulate on or around the imperfection.
7.2.5
Determine the depth of all imperfections/defects holding powder, except

fatigue cracks, using a file or grinder. The presence of a fatigue crack is
cause for classifying the material as unfit for further drilling service.

7.3
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 11 of 38

Imperfections
7.2.6
All grinds must be contoured and the area reinspected unless the pipe is
classified as unfit for further drilling service.
7.2.7
Classify the pipe in accordance with applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through

7.2.3 18.
Evaluation of Internal Indications

7.3.1
In some cases a "fuzzy" type magnetic particle build will appear on the
external surface but nothing can be found on the external pipe surface.
This could be an indication of an internal surface imperfection. In this
case, the internal surface of the pipe must be examined in the
questionable area.
7.3.2
If necessary, clean the inside of the pipe with a rotary wire brush and blow
out all excess residue.
7.3.3
With the buggy mag coil "OFF", use a non-magnetic trough to place dry
magnetic particles inside the pipe in the suspect area.
7.3.4
With the buggy mag coil placed 6 to 12 inches (15 to 30 cm) from the
marked area, turn the coil "ON" and roll the pipe at least one (1) full
revolution.
7.3.5
Examine the questionable area using a hand-held light or mirror or with an

optical instrument in accordance with 10.3.
7.3.6
If a powder build is present, lightly tap the pipe around the area. If a
transverse powder build remains in the area, the length most likely is
cracked and must be classified according.
7.3.7
If only pitting is present, determine the remaining wall thickness above the
pitting, in accordance with 9.4 and classify the pipe in accordance with the
applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through 7.2.3 18, or customer specifications.
7.3.8
If, after all proper prove-up procedures have been performed, crack like
indications still appear on the log or display when the buggy is traversed
over the area in question, the length will be placed in a lower classification
depending on the general condition and known failure history of the drill
string. If several lengths with this condition exist in the string, the customer
must be notified as to the proper disposition of these lengths.

8.0
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 12 of 38

Imperfections
LOCATION AND EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED UNIT INDICATIONS

8.1
For automated inspection systems (EMI and FLUT) without a paint marking
system, all information gathered during the evaluation of indications shall be
documented on a runsheet or masterlog and correlated to the prove-up report.
8.2
For automated inspection systems (EMI and FLUT) with a paint marking system,
all information gathered during the evaluation of indications shall be documented
on a prove-up report and correlated to the computer print-out or map.
8.3
A Prove-up Report shall be maintained, by the prove-up personnel, during

prove-up to document all indications and the results of the prove-up, by joint
number. The operator shall initial each page of the Prove-up Report indicating
that the report is correct and correlates with the runsheet or computer flag
report.
8.4
Multiple indications from automated inspection systems shall be evaluated

beginning with the most severe indication and proceeding to either end. If the
joint is rejected at any point, further evaluation shall not be performed unless
required by the customer.
8.5
These documents shall be kept current and shall be returned to the operator
when completed. After approval by the operator, the automated inspection
system runsheet and prove-up report shall be checked for completeness and
accuracy by the plant manager or his assistant/lead person.
8.6
The area of interest, as defined by the applicable automated unit Tuboscope

SOP, shall be investigated. All areas shall be investigated using all or a
combination of visual, magnetic particle or ultrasonic techniques.
8.7
Drill Pipe Body Indications (Except for FLUT Indications)

8.7.1
Areas to be investigated shall be visually examined and then an AC yoke

shall be used for magnetic particle investigation. The yoke shall be
applied with its handle oriented at approximately 90 to the estimated
orientation of the indication. The yoke legs shall overlap 50% to ensure
complete coverage with maximum sensitivity. The area to be yoked is
defined in the applicable SOP.
8.7.2
Once the imperfection has been identified, proceed in accordance with

9.0.
8.7.3
If an imperfection cannot be located, scan the area with compression


Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 13 of 38

Imperfections
wave ultrasonics, searching for internal pitting in accordance with 6.3 in

SOP III-403.
8.8
8.9
8.7.4
If an imperfection cannot be located using the techniques in 8.7.3, the

area shall be further investigated in accordance with 7.3.
8.7.5
If an imperfection cannot be located using the techniques in 8.7.4, the

joint shall be re-inspected through the unit and if the indications still
appear on the log or display, the length will be placed in a lower
classification depending on the general condition and known failure history
of the drill string. If several lengths with this condition exist in the string,
the customer must be notified as to the proper disposition of these lengths.
Critical/Slip Area External Indications

8.8.1
Areas to be investigated shall be inspected in accordance with 8.7.1 and

8.7.2.
8.8.2
If the indication is not located as described above, scan the area using
shear wave ultrasonics in accordance with the requirements in SOP III400.
8.8.3
If an imperfection cannot be located using the technique in 8.8.2, the

area shall be classified as acceptable.
Critical/Slip Area Internal Indications

8.9.1
Areas to be investigated shall be examined with shear wave ultrasonics,

searching for subsurface and/or internal surface breaking imperfections
in accordance with SOP III-400. The area to be examined is defined in
the applicable SOP.
8.9.2
If an imperfection cannot be located, visually inspect the internal surface

with a light, searching for internal pitting.
8.9.3
If an imperfection cannot be located, scan the area with compression

wave ultrasonics, searching for internal pitting in accordance with 6.3 in
SOP III-403.
8.9.4
If an imperfection cannot be located using the technique in 8.9.3, the

area shall be classified as acceptable.
8.10 FLUT Indications. All information gathered during the evaluation of indications

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 14 of 38

Imperfections
shall be documented on a runsheet or masterlog and correlated to the prove-up

report (computer print-out or map).
8.10.1 These documents shall be kept current and shall be returned to the
operator when completed. After approval by the operator, the automated
inspection system runsheet and prove-up report shall be checked for
completeness and accuracy by the plant manager or his assistant/lead
person.
8.10.2 The area of interest, as defined in the applicable SOP, shall be
investigated. All areas shall be investigated using all or a combination of
visual, magnetic particle, ultrasonic or liquid penetrant techniques (when
applicable).
8.10.3 For Ferromagnetic Materials. Relevant indications shall be investigated
for imperfections by visual, magnetic particle and/or ultrasonic methods.
a. External Surface Investigation. Investigate the area in accordance
with 8.8.
b. Internal Surface Investigation. Investigate the area in accordance
with 8.9.
8.10.4 For Nonferromagnetic Materials.
Relevant indications shall be
investigated for imperfections by visual, ultrasonic and/or liquid penetrant
methods.
a. External Surface Investigation
1. Areas to be investigated shall be visually inspected and then
shear wave ultrasonics shall be used for evaluation in
accordance with SOP III-400.
2. If an imperfection cannot be located, liquid penetrant testing shall
be used for further investigation in accordance with SOP III-501.
3. If an imperfection cannot be located using the techniques in
8.10.4.a.1 and 8.10.4.a.2, the area shall be classified as
acceptable.
b. Internal Surface Investigation
1. Areas to be investigated shall be inspected with shear and

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 15 of 38

Imperfections
compression wave ultrasonics, searching for subsurface and/or

internal surface breaking imperfections in accordance with SOP
III-400 and SOP III-403, respectively. The area to be inspected
is defined in the applicable SOP.
2. If an imperfection cannot be located using the techniques in
8.10.4.b.1, the area shall be classified as acceptable.
8.11 All prove-up markings shall be blacked out or completely removed from the
outside surface of acceptable material after all indications have been fully
evaluated.
9.0
EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF OUTSIDE SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS

9.1
The area of interest as defined by the method(s) which initially located the
indication shall be clearly defined. Subsequent method(s) shall be employed to
more clearly define the nature and relevancy of the indication, (i.e.; visual,
magnetic particle, liquid penetrant, ultrasonics, etc.) its orientation and location
(internal or external surface). Refer to the applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through
7.2.3 18 for calculated pipe body wall thickness values.
9.2
Cracks. Confirmed cracks located by any method are cause for rejection without
further investigation. Internal cracks should be confirmed visually in accordance
with 10.3.
9.3
Depth Measurement of Imperfections. Zero the dial depth gauge on a flat

surface such as a mirror or glass, not on the material surface. If the normal
pipe contour is irregular or has a dent, the depth gauge shall be zeroed adjacent
to the imperfection. The dial depth gauge shall be placed on the material
surface with the anvil parallel to the longitudinal axis of the material. Ensure that
the contact is placed in the deepest part of the imperfection or grind. The gauge
shall be held upright and perpendicular to the material surface, leaning of the
gauge during measurement is prohibited.
NOTE: The reference to grinds in the above paragraph is only applicable to

manufacturing imperfections. Refer to 9.5.
9.3.1
Before measurement ensure that all varnish, loose scale and metal
protrusions have been removed with a flat file.
9.3.2
Re-verify the zero setting of the dial depth gauge prior to rejecting any
material.

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 16 of 38

Imperfections
9.3.3
Classification shall be based on RBW. Proceed in accordance with 9.4.
9.3.4
When specified by the customer, imperfections in I.E of Table 7.2.3 - 1

through 7.2.3 18, may be removed if adequate body wall exists which
would permit complete removal of the defect. Complete defect removal
shall be verified using MT. Proceed in accordance with 9.4 to make this
determination.
NOTE: Customer specifications may supersede these dispositions.

NOTE: The removal of fatigue cracks is not permitted.
9.4
Determination of Remaining Body Wall (RBW). Using an ultrasonic thickness

gauge in accordance with SOP III-403, measure the wall thickness adjacent to
the deepest portion of the imperfection on each side of the imperfection or
exploratory probe grind. Subtract the depth of the imperfection or grind from the
average of these two (2) wall readings. If the resultant wall thickness is less
than one (1) of the minimum remaining wall thickness values defined in the
applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through 7.2.3 18 or customer specification, the length
shall be classified accordingly.
NOTE: The reference to grinds in the above paragraph is only applicable to

manufacturing imperfections. Refer to 9.5.
9.4.1
Record on the Drill Pipe Inspection Tally Sheet, in the Wall Thickness
column, ONLY if this is the most severe bodywall reduction for the length. If
recorded, record in a decimal form in thousandths of an inch, i.e.: 0.265".
NOTE: 9.5 is applicable only to manufacturing imperfections.

9.5
Exploration. For manufacturing imperfections, such as seams and laps, which

do not allow direct depth measurement may need to be probed to determine the
depth. Probing shall be performed with either a file or grinder.
9.5.1
Prior to removing any surface metal, the surrounding body wall shall be
measured with an ultrasonic thickness gauge in accordance with SOP
III-403. A determination shall be made on the amount of metal to be
removed based on the resultant surrounding body wall.
9.5.2
Probing the imperfection shall be performed carefully to ensure a defect

is not created by over-grinding. For non-radial type imperfections, follow
the imperfection with the grinder or file so that when completed, the

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 17 of 38

Imperfections
imperfection is located in the deepest part of the probed area.

a. Probe only deep enough to meet the rejection criteria or until the
imperfection has broken, whichever is less. Probing shall be
performed in such a manner as to ensure no sharp edges are
produced.
b. For imperfections exceeding 1/2 inch (13 mm) in length, probe the
imperfection in several locations throughout its length to locate the
deepest part of the imperfection.
9.5.3
If adequate body wall exists which would facilitate removal of the

imperfection, and removal is requested by the customer, the imperfection
may be removed by contour grinding and re-verifying the remaining body
wall after complete removal. Allow the contoured area to cool to
approximately the same surface temperature as the surrounding
pipe body prior to taking wall thickness measurements.
NOTE: Materials expand when heated, therefore, wall thickness readings taken
on hot material may be in error.
a. Re-inspect the ground area with using magnetic particles.
b. All grinds shall be coated with a rust inhibitor (or black enamel paint)
after grinding/evaluation has been completed.
9.5.4
If a defect cannot be removed to salvage the material, the length shall be

classified in accordance with the applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through 7.2.3
18.
10.0 EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF INSIDE SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS

10.1 The area of interest as defined by the method(s) which initially located the
indication shall be clearly defined. Subsequent method(s) may be employed to
more clearly define the nature and relevancy of the indication (i.e.; visual
[borescope], magnetic particle, ultrasonics, etc.). Compression wave ultrasonics
shall be used to locate and evaluate the imperfection. Ultrasonic thickness
gauging shall be performed in accordance with SOP III-403.
10.2 Imperfections which cannot be located through the use of compression wave
ultrasonics should be evaluated with the use of shear wave ultrasonics in
accordance with SOP III-400.
10.3 Visual Verification of Internal Cracks. To confirm the presence of internal cracks

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 18 of 38

Imperfections
and/or to distinguish pit signals from cracks, further evaluation shall be

performed using dry magnetic particles, a coil and/or an optical instrument in
accordance with 7.3 and 10.3, respectively.
NOTE: The use of MT on internally coated drill pipe may not yield acceptable results
and the evaluation may be limited to ultrasonics.
10.3.1 Optiscope Procedures.
Assemble the borescope instrument in
accordance with SOP III-101. Care shall be used to protect the
borescope electrical cord, it must be kept in excellent condition and
grounded to eliminate electrical shock hazards. Be sure that all needed
centralizer baskets have been attached.
a. The area to be evaluated should have been precisely marked during
the initial inspection which detected the imperfection.
b. Lay the optical instrument alongside the pipe and place the illuminating
head by the chalked area.
c. Wrap a piece of tape around the instrument at the point which is
aligned with the pipe end.
d. Slowly slide the optical instrument into the pipe end to be inspected.
One (1) person must be located at the illuminated head end and the
other at the eye piece end, then position the illuminating head near the
area to be inspected.
e. Plug the isolation transformer power cable into a 110 volt outlet. Next
plug the illuminating head cable into the transformer.
f.
Using the tape as a distance marker locate the imperfection and

determine its size and severity in accordance with 10.3.2.
10.3.2 Imperfection Size Chart. Table 10.3.2 is a chart showing the relationship
between the size of the image viewed versus the actual size of the
imperfection. When used properly, this chart will enable the operator to
more accurately estimate the size of the imperfection.
11.0 EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF DENTS OR OTHER MECHANICAL DAMAGE
Dents shall be evaluated using a micrometer or spring caliper in accordance with the
applicable Table 7.2.3 - 1 through 7.2.3 18.

Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 19 of 38

Imperfections
12.0 POST EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Other applicable post inspection procedures in 18.0 of SOP III-001 shall be followed.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 20 of 38

Imperfections

Table 7.2.3 - 1 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe

2-3/8 in., 6.65#/ft., 0.280 in.
1/32 in. = 11.1% wall
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
60,3 mm, 9,9 kg/m, 7,11 mm

1/32 in. = 1.3% OD
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm
Class 3
One Orange Band
Three Center Punch Marks
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
One Center Punch Mark
Two Center Punch Marks
I. Exterior Conditions
Not less than 0.224 in.
(5,70 mm)

(4,98 mm)
Not over 5/64 in. (1,8 mm)
Depth not over 10% of

4
average adjacent wall

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
E. Corrosion, Cuts, &
Gouges

(5,70 mm)

(4,98 mm)
Longitudinal

(5,70 mm)
Transverse

(5,70 mm)

(4,98 mm)
(4,98 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C. Slip Area Mechanical
Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
Any imperfection or damages

exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None
II. Interior Conditions

A. Corrosive Pitting
Wall
RBW not less than 0.224 in.

(5,70 mm) measured from
base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(5,70 mm)

(4,98 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
The premium classification is recommended for service where it is anticipated that torsional or tensile limits for class 2 drill pipe
will be exceeded. These limits can be found in API RP 7G. Premium class shall be identified with two (2) white bands, plus
one (1) center punch mark on the 35 or 18 shoulder of the pin end tool joint.
Remaining wall shall not be less than the value in I.E., defects may be ground out providing the remaining wall is not reduced
below these values and such grinding shall be approximately faired into the outer contour of the pipe.
In any classification where cracks or washouts appear, the pipe shall be identified with a red band and considered unfit for
further drilling service.
Average adjacent wall is determined by measuring the wall thickness on each side of the cut or gouge, adjacent to the deepest
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 21 of 38

Imperfections


2-7/8 in., 10.40#/ft., 0.362 in.
1/32 in. = 8.6% wall
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
73,0 mm, 15,5 kg/m, 9,19 mm

1/32 in. = 1.1% OD
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm
Class 3
One Orange Band
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,37 mm)
Transverse

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion

exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 22 of 38

Imperfections


3-1/2 in., 9.50#/ft., 0.254 in.
1/32 in. = 12.2% wall
88,9 mm, 14,1 kg/m, 6,45 mm

1/32 in. = 0.89% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(5,16 mm)

(4,52 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(5,16 mm)

(4,52 mm)
Longitudinal

(5,16 mm)
Transverse

(5,16 mm)

(4,52 mm)
(4,52 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(5,16 mm)

(4,52 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 23 of 38

Imperfections


3-1/2 in., 13.30#/ft., 0.368 in.
1/32 in. = 8.5% wall
88,9 mm, 19,8 kg/m, 9,35 mm

1/32 in. = 0.89% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
B. Dents & Mashes
Crushing, necking
C.
Slip Area Mechanical

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,47 mm)

(6,55 mm)

4

4

1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2


Gouges
(7,47 mm)

(6,55 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,47 mm)
Transverse

(7,47 mm)

(6,55 mm)
(6,55 mm)
None
1. Corrosion
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,47 mm)

(6,55 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 24 of 38

Imperfections


3-1/2 in., 15.50#/ft., 0.449 in.
1/32 in. = 7.0% wall
88,9 mm, 23,1 kg/m, 11,40 mm

1/32 in. = 0.89% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(9,12 mm)

(7,98 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(9,12 mm)

(7,98 mm)
Longitudinal

(9,12 mm)
Transverse

(9,12 mm)

(7,98 mm)
(7,98 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(9,12 mm)

(7,98 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 25 of 38

Imperfections


4 in., 14.00#/ft., 0.330 in.
1/32 in. = 9.5% wall
101,6 mm, 20,8 kg/m, 8,38 mm

1/32 in. = 0.78% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
Longitudinal

(6,71 mm)
Transverse

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
(5,87 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 26 of 38

Imperfections


4-1/2 in., 13.75#/ft., 0.271 in.
1/32 in. = 11.4% wall
114,3 mm, 20,5 kg/m, 6,88 mm

1/32 in. = 0.69% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(5,51 mm)

(4,83 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(5,51 mm)

(4,83 mm)
Longitudinal

(5,51 mm)
Transverse

(5,51 mm)

(4,83 mm)
(4,83 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(5,51 mm)

(4,83 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 27 of 38

Imperfections


4-1/2 in., 16.60#/ft., 0.337 in.
1/32 in. = 9.3% wall
114,3 mm, 24,7 kg/m, 8,56 mm

1/32 in. = 0.69% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(6,89 mm)

(6,0 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(6,89 mm)

(6,0 mm)
Longitudinal

(6,89 mm)
Transverse

(6,89 mm)

(6,0 mm)
(6,0 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

(6,0 mm) measured from base
of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(6,89 mm)

(6,0 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 28 of 38

Imperfections


4-1/2 in., 20.00#/ft., 0.430 in.
1/32 in. = 7.3% wall
114,3 mm, 29,8 kg/m, 10,92 mm

1/32 in. = 0.69% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(8,74 mm)

(7,65 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(8,74 mm)

(7,65 mm)
Longitudinal

(8,74 mm)
Transverse

(8,74 mm)

(7,65 mm)
(7,65 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(8,74 mm)

(7,65 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
5.
6.
7.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 29 of 38

Imperfections


5 in., 16.25#/ft., 0.296 in.
1/32 in. = 10.5% wall
127,0 mm, 24,2 kg/m, 7,52 mm

1/32 in. = 0.62% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(6,02 mm)

(5,26 mm)
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

(6,02 mm)

(6.02 mm)
Longitudinal

(6,02 mm)
Transverse

(6,02 mm)

(6.02 mm)
(6.02 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

(6.02 mm) measured from
base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(6,02 mm)

(6.02 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 30 of 38

Imperfections

Table 7.2.3 - 11 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 5 in., 19.50#/ft., 0.362 in.
5 in., 19.50#/ft., 0.362 in.
1/32 in. = 8.6% wall
127,0 mm, 29,0 kg/m, 9,19 mm

1/32 in. = 0.62% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,37 mm)
Transverse

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 31 of 38

Imperfections

Table 7.2.3 - 12 - Classification of Used Drill Pipe: 5 in., 25.60#/ft., 0.500 in.
5 in., 25.60#/ft., 0.500 in.
1/32 in. = 6.2% wall
127,0 mm, 38,1 kg/m, 12,70 mm

1/32 in. = 0.62% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(10,20 mm)

(8,90 mm)
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 13/64 in. (5,08 mm)

(10,20 mm)

(8,90 mm)
Longitudinal

(10,20 mm)
Transverse

(10,20 mm)

(8,90 mm)
(8,90 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(10,20 mm)

(8,90 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 32 of 38

Imperfections


5-1/2 in., 21.90#/ft., 0.361 in.
1/32 in. = 8.6% wall
139,7 mm, 32,6 kg/m, 9,17 mm

1/32 in. = 0.56% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,34 mm)
Transverse

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 33 of 38

Imperfections


5-1/2 in., 24.70#/ft., 0.415 in.
1/32 in. = 7.5% wall
139,7 mm, 36,8 kg/m, 10,54 mm

1/32 in. = 0.56% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(8,43 mm)

(7,39 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
2. String Shot
Gouges

(8,43 mm)

(7,39 mm)
Longitudinal

(8,43 mm)
Transverse

(8,43 mm)

(7,39 mm)
(7,39 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(8,43 mm)

(7,39 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 34 of 38

Imperfections


5-7/8 in., 23.40#/ft., 0.361 in.
1/32 in. = 8.6% wall
149,2 mm, 34,8 kg/m, 9,17 mm

1/32 in. = 0.53% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,34 mm)
Transverse

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 35 of 38

Imperfections


5-7/8 in., 26.30#/ft., 0.415 in.
1/32 in. = 7.5% wall
149,2 mm, 39,1 kg/m, 10,54 mm

1/32 in. = 0.53% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 11/64 in. (4,48 mm)
Not over 15/64 in. (5,97 mm)

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,34 mm)
Transverse

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,34 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 36 of 38

Imperfections


6-5/8 in., 25.20#/ft., 0.330 in.
1/32 in. = 9.4% wall
168,3 mm, 37,5 kg/m, 8,38 mm

1/32 in. = 0.47% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
Not over 17/64 in. (6,73 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 17/64 in. (6,73 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 3/164 in. (5,05 mm)
Not over 17/64 in. (6,73 mm)

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
Longitudinal

(6,71 mm)
Transverse

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
(5,87 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(6,71 mm)

(5,87 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 37 of 38

Imperfections


6-5/8 in., 27.70#/ft., 0.362 in.
1/32 in. = 8.6% wall
168,3 mm, 41,3 kg/m, 9,19 mm

1/32 in. = 0.47% OD
1
Pipe Body Condition
A. OD Wear
Wall
Premium Class
Class 2
Two White Bands
One Yellow Band
(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Not over 17/64 in. (5,05 mm)

4

4
1. Stretched
Not over 17/64 in. (5,05 mm)
2. String Shot
Gouges
Not over 3/164 in. (5,05 mm)
Not over 17/64 in. (5,05 mm)

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
Longitudinal

(7,37 mm)
Transverse

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
(6,43 mm)
None
B. Dents & Mashes

Crushing, necking
C.

Damage
2
Cuts , gouges
D. Stress Induced
Diameter Variations
1. Corrosion
1/32 in. = 0,79 mm

Class 3
One Orange Band
exceeding Class 2
2. Cuts & Gouges
F. Cracks
None
None

Wall

base of deepest pit

base of deepest pit
B. Erosion & Wear

(7,37 mm)

(6,43 mm)
None
Wall
3
C. Cracks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None
None
penetration.
Issued Date
August 1, 2005
SOP No.
III-002
Revision 0
Page No. 38 of 38

Imperfections

Table 10.3.2 - Imperfection Size Chart

Pipe Size
Example:
Inches
mm
2-3/8
Actual Size of
Imperfection
Inches
Inches
mm
60,3
3.3
83,8
2-7/8
73,0
2.4
61,0
88,9
1.8
45,7
101,6
1.5
38,1
114,3
1.35
34,3
127,0
1.2
30,5
139,7
1.2
30,5
6-5/8
168,3
0.9
22,9
mm
Size of Image of
Imperfection
25,4
In 2-7/8 inch (73,0 mm) OD drill pipe, if the imperfection appears to be 1 inch (25,4 mm) in
diameter, its actual size is 1 inch (25,4 mm) divided by 2.4 inches (61,0 mm) or
approximately 0.417 inches (10,6 mm) in diameter. In 6-5/8 inch (168,3 mm) OD drill pipe, if
the imperfection appears to be 1 inch (25,4 mm) in diameter, its actual size is 1 inch (25,4
mm) divided by 0.9 inches (22,9 mm) or approximately 1.1 inches (28,2 mm) in diameter.

Sop Iii-002 R00

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Sop Iii-002 R00

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sop Iii-002 R00

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NOTE: This document is considered COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL and is not to be distributed

PROCEDURE APPROVAL: ___________________________ DATE: _____________

PROCEDURE APPROVAL: ___________________________ DATE: ______________

Copyright 2005 Tuboscope, P.O. Box 808, Houston, Texas 77001

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

Copyright 2005 Tuboscope, P.O. Box 808, Houston, Texas 77001

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

Copyright 2005 Tuboscope, P.O. Box 808, Houston, Texas 77001

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

This procedure establishes the minimum requirements for evaluation and

Evaluation of thread imperfections is not covered in this document. Refer to

SOP III-001 General Requirements.

1.4.6 SOP III-100 Visual and Dimensional Inspection.

SOP III-101 - Tuboscope Optical Instrument.

1.4.8 SOP III-200 Magnetic Particle Inspection.

Copyright 2005 Tuboscope, P.O. Box 808, Houston, Texas 77001

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

1.4.13 NS-2 North Sea Drillstring Inspection Standard.

COMPLIANCE WITH PROVE-UP SPECIFICATIONS

Defect. An imperfection of sufficient magnitude to warrant rejection of the

Discontinuity. A lack of continuity or cohesion; an intentional or unintentional

Evaluation. A review, following interpretation of the indications noted, to

Imperfection. A discontinuity in the product wall or on the product surface that

Indication. The response or evidence from a nondestructive examination. An

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

Non-linear Imperfection. A non-linear imperfection includes, but is not limited to,

Relevant Indication or Imperfection. Any indication or imperfection that has the

An AC powered blower or air compressor.

Metal marker (paint marker).

An optical instrument as defined in SOP III-101, shall be used to aid in the

Borescopes shall be capable of displaying the date on a penny, dime or

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

Magnetic particle testing equipment, as defined in SOP III-200, may be used to

An electromagnetic AC or DC yoke with adjustable legs shall be used for

NOTE: A pre-existing or induced longitudinal magnetic field may be used in lieu

The application of dry magnetic particles to inside surface shall be

Liquid penetrant testing equipment, as defined in SOP III-501, may be used to

An ultrasonic thickness gauge, as defined in SOP III-403, shall be used to aid in

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

Evaluation of Pipe Body

with contacts which are flat or rounded.

Prove-Up Rack Height. A quality and accurate prove-up examination can be

Exploratory. Exploratory grinding should be round bottomed. To avoid

VOLUME III USED DRILL PIPE

PROCEDURE APPROVAL: _______________ DATE: _

PROCEDURE APPROVAL: _____________ DATE: