Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phonon and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Mnwo Prepared by Hydrothermal Method
Phonon and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Mnwo Prepared by Hydrothermal Method
Vibrational Spectroscopy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vibspec
nski
Mirosaw Maczka
, Maciej Ptak a, Adam Pikul a, Leszek Kepi
, Pawe E. Tomaszewski a, Jerzy Hanuza a,b
a
b
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1410, 50-950 Wrocaw 2, Poland
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Industry and Economics, University of Economics, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocaw, Poland
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 August 2011
Received in revised form
14 December 2011
Accepted 15 December 2011
Available online 24 December 2011
Keywords:
Infrared
Raman
Magnetization
Specic heat
Multiferroic
a b s t r a c t
Well-crystallized MnWO4 nanoparticles with 20100 nm sizes were synthesized by a mild hydrothermal
crystallization process. X-ray diffraction and TEM results show that particles have tendency to grow in a
shape of nanorods elongated in the c direction. They also show that the particles synthesized from MnCl2
have smaller concentration of defects than those synthesized from MnSO4 H2 O. Raman spectra revealed
weak changes with decreasing particle size due to phonon connement effect and defects. In contrast to
this behavior, IR spectra showed much more pronounced changes. Origin of this behavior is discussed.
Raman and IR spectra showed also presence of additional bands at 923 and 914 cm1 , respectively. These
bands have been attributed to presence of terminal W O bonds at the surface of MnWO4 nanocrystallites.
Specic heat and magnetization studies revealed broad anomalies at 11.011.4 K, which correspond to
the two magnetic transitions found for bulk MnWO4 at 12.5 and 13.5 K.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In recent years, multiferroic magnetoelectric materials have
attracted much attention since a coexistence of magnetic and ferroelectric orders leads to novel physical effects [1]. Multiferroics
are also very attractive materials for a wide range of applications.
For instance, they can be used for fabrication of magnetoelectric sensors and memory chips [2,3]. In recent years, several new
multiferroic materials have been discovered such as DyMnO3
[4], Ni3 V2 O8 [5] and CuFeO2 [6]. Multiferroic properties have
also been discovered in some molybdates and tungstates such as
RbFe(MoO4 )2 [7] and MnWO4 [8].
The crystal structure of MnWO4 is monoclinic, space group
P2/c (#13, C2h 4 ), with the unit cell parameters: a = 4.830(1),
= 91.14 and Z = 2 [9]. It consists of
b = 5.7603(9), c = 4.994(1) A,
edge-sharing WO6 and MnO6 octahedra that form chains along the
c axis (see Fig. 1). The WO6 octahedra within a chain are connected
by a double oxygen bridge with shorter W O1 and longer W O1
respectively [9]. The remaining O2
distance of 1.9101 and 2.1377 A,
Manganese
oxygen atoms form short W O2 distance of 1.7847 A.
M. Maczka
et al. / Vibrational Spectroscopy 58 (2012) 163168
164
2. Experimental
MnWO4 nanoparticles were synthesized by the hydrothermal
method using chemicals of analytical grade. In synthesis, 4 mmol
of MnSO4 H2 O (SigmaAldrich, 99%), and 4 mmol of Na2 WO4 2H2 O
(Alfa Aesar, 99%) were dissolved in deionized water. All solutions
were mixed together under stirring. The suspension formed in this
way was poured into the Teon reaction vessel, which was put
into a microwave autoclave. Next the introduced preheating at
115 C was run for half an hour. The hydrothermal reaction was
subsequently conducted at isothermal condition for one and half
an hour at different temperatures ranging from 120 to 230 C.
Additionally, two samples were prepared in a different way. First,
the reaction was conducted at 230 C for ve and half an hour
with the above mentioned preheating. Second, the reaction was
conducted at 100 C for 2 h without preheating. After this treatment the autoclave was cooled to room temperature by the water.
Resulting powders were ltered off, washed several times with
deionized water and nally dried in air at 80 C for 20 h. Apart of
the above described syntheses, where MnSO4 H2 O was a source
of manganese ions, one synthesis was performed at 100 C using
MnCl2 (SigmaAldrich, 99%).
XRD patterns were recorded at room temperature by using
XPert PRO powder diffractometer (PANalytical, The Netherlands)
working in the transmission or reection geometry, equipped with
M. Maczka
et al. / Vibrational Spectroscopy 58 (2012) 163168
165
Fig. 2. Raman spectra of the polycrystalline (bulk) and nanocrystalline MnWO4 samples. Arrows indicate the additional Raman band assigned to defects.
Fig. 3. Mid-IR (a) and far-IR (b) spectra of the polycrystalline (bulk) and nanocrystalline MnWO4 samples.
166
M. Maczka
et al. / Vibrational Spectroscopy 58 (2012) 163168
M. Maczka
et al. / Vibrational Spectroscopy 58 (2012) 163168
publications that shape and maximum intensity of an IR transmission band can be very dependent upon the size and shape of the
specimen due to the long-range Coulomb forces [3336]. As a result,
in ionic crystals the maximum absorption of an IR band may be
located between TO and LO [33,37]. For cubic crystals, maximum
absorption can be calculated from the known LOTO splitting for
different shapes of nanocrystals [36]. For instance, long rodlike particle should absorb near TO for polarization parallel to the rod axis
and between TO and LO for polarization perpendicular to the rod
axis [36]. In case of monoclinic MnWO4 , behavior of the IR bands
is expected to be more complicated. Furthermore, literature data
showed that if particle aggregations are formed, the dipoledipole
interactions between particles might give rise to an additional
broadening and shift of an IR band [38]. Closer inspection of our IR
spectra show that for the sample synthesized at 230 C all modes
absorb slightly above TO, except of four modes that exhibit large
shifts towards LO value, i.e. from 795, 656, 495 and 348 cm1 (TO
values) to 828, 700, 512 and 360 cm1 , respectively. When synthesis temperature decreases, nearly all Au and Bu modes shift closer
to TO values. The only exception is the Bu stretching mode, which
shifts slightly closer to LO value, i.e. from 828 cm1 for the sample synthesized at 230 C to 832 cm1 for the sample synthesized
at 100 C. TEM images show that decrease of the synthesis temperature leads not only to smaller size of the crystallites but also
to some change in their shape. Change of shape should contribute
to the observed shifts of IR bands but this effect should be similar
for the modes polarized in the same direction. Our former polarized IR studies of Mn0.85 Co0.15 WO4 and Mn0.97 Fe0.03 WO4 crystals
showed that the mentioned above Bu mode, which exhibits positive shift with decreasing particle size, is polarized along the a axis
[25]. However, the remaining Bu modes polarized along the a axis
at 795, 458, 359, 209 and 141 cm1 (TO values) exhibit negative
shifts. Therefore, change of the MnWO4 particle shape alone cannot explain the observed behavior of the IR bands. We conclude,
therefore, that the observed shifts of IR bands are related to many
factors such as change of particle shape, concentration of defects,
degree of particles aggregation and phonon connement effect.
3.3. Magnetic susceptibility and heat capacity
Fig. 4a presents temperature dependence of the magnetization
M(T) of the MnWO4 sample synthesized at 180 C. This sample
was chosen for magnetic studies since it is composed of wellcrystallized particles and shows relatively small distribution of
particle sizes. The distinct maximum at 11.0 K is an evidence of a
magnetic ordering that occurs in the compound. Rise of the magnetization below 6 K can be most likely attributed to presence of some
paramagnetic impurities. The antiferromagnetic ordering manifests itself also in the temperature variation of the specic heat
Cp (T) as a distinct anomaly located at 11.4 K (see Fig. 4b). No anomalies are observed near the expected phase transition at 6.58 K. The
absolute values of the magnetization are close to those reported
for bulk MnWO4 [10]. However, only one broad anomaly appears,
instead of two expected transitions at TN and T2 . This result can
be attributed to small size of the crystallites and size distribution
of nanocrystallites. Our results also show that the magnetic phase
transition appears at slightly lower temperature for the nanocrystalline sample (11.011.4 K) when compared to the bulk material
(T2 12.5 K and TN 13.5 K [10]). It is worth to add that former magnetic susceptibility studies of MnWO4 nanowires with an average
diameter of 200 nm could not detect any anomalies, which might
correspond to the three thermodynamic transitions found for bulk
MnWO4 [18]. Instead, a broad anomaly was observed near 7.5 K,
which was attributed to structural disorder in the sample, such
as the presence of small-crystalline particulate regions [18]. Our
MnWO4 nanoparticles are highly crystallized and in this case the
167
168
M. Maczka
et al. / Vibrational Spectroscopy 58 (2012) 163168
[5] G. Lawes, A.B. Harris, T. Kimura, N. Rogado, R.J. Cava, A. Aharony, O. EntinWohlman, T. Yildrim, M. Kenzelmann, C. Broholm, A.P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. Lett.
95 (2005) 087205.
[6] T. Kimura, J.C. Lashley, A.P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 220401.
[7] M. Kanzelmann, G. Lawes, A.B. Harris, G. Gasparovic, C. Broholm, A.P. Ramirez,
G.A. Jorge, M. Jaime, S. Park, Q. Huang, A.Y. Shapiro, L.A. Demianets, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 98 (2007) 267205.
[8] O. Heyer, N. Hollmann, S. Jodlauk, L. Bohaty, P. Becker, J.A. Mydosh, T. Lorenz,
D. Khomskii, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18 (2006) L471.
[9] J. Macavei, H.Z. Schulz, Kristallogr. 207 (1993) 193.
[10] A.H. Arkenbout, T.T.M. Palstra, T. Siegrist, T. Kimura, Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006)
184431.
[11] K. Taniguchi, N. Abe, T. Takenobu, Y. Iwasa, T. Arima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006)
097203.
[12] W. Qu, J.U. Meyer, Meas. Sci. Technol. 8 (1997) 593.
[13] P. Becker, L. Bohaty, H.J. Eichler, H. Rhee, A.A. Kaminskii, Laser Phys. Lett. 4
(2007) 884.
[14] L. Zhang, C. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Cheng, Mater. Chem. Phys. 103 (2007) 433.
[15] S. Thongtem, S. Wannapop, A. Phuruangrat, T. Thongtem, Mater. Lett. 63 (2009)
833.
[16] S.J. Chen, X.T. Chen, Z. Xue, J.H. Zhou, J. Li, J.M. Hong, X.Z. You, J. Mater. Chem.
13 (2003) 1132.
[17] Y. Xing, S. Song, J. Feng, Y. Lei, M. Li, H. Zhang, Solid State Sci. 10 (2008) 1299.
[18] H. Zhou, Y. Yiu, M.C. Aronson, S.S. Wong, J. Solid State Chem. 181 (2008)
1539.
[19] W. Tong, L. Li, W. Hu, T. Yan, X. Guan, G. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010)
15298.
[20] P. Colomban, Spectroscopy Europe 15 (2003) June 8.
[21] J.E. Spanier, R.D. Robinson, F. Zhang, S.W. Chan, I.P. Herman, Phys. Rev. B 64
(2001) 245407.
[22] S. Chattopadhyay, P. Ayyub, V.R. Palkar, M. Multani, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995)
13177.
[23] J.M. Amig, F.J. Serrano, M.A. Kojdecki, J. Bastida, V. Esteve, M.M. Revents, F.
Marti, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25 (1995) 1479.
[24] M.N. Iliev, M.M. Gospodinov, A.P. Litvinchuk, Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 212302.
[25] M. Maczka, M. Ptak, K. Hermanowicz, A. Majchrowski, A. Pikul, J. Hanuza, Phys.
Rev. B 83 (2011) 174439.
[26] B. Ingham, C.V. Chong, J.L. Tallon, Soft condensed matter: new research, in:
K.I. Dillon (Ed.), OrganicInorganic Layered Hybrid Materials, Nova Science
Publishers, 2007 (Chapter 6).
[27] J. Hanuza, M. Maczka, J.H. Van der Maas, J. Mol. Struct. 348 (1995) 349.
[28] A. Kuzmin, M. Kalendarev, A. Kursitis, J. Purans, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 353 (2007)
1840.
[29] Y. Djaoued, S. Priya, S. Balaji, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 354 (2008) 673.
[30] M.F. Daniel, B. Desbat, J.C. Lassegues, B. Gerand, M. Figlarz, J. Solid State Chem.
67 (1987) 235.
[31] A.K. Arora, M. Rajalakshmi, T.R. Ravindran, V. Sivasubramanian, J. Raman Spectrosc. 38 (2007) 604.
[32] M. Saito, J. Suda, T. Sato, J. Spectrosc. Soc. Jpn. 51 (2002) 65.
[33] I.I. Shaganov, T.S. Perova, V.A. Melnikov, S.A. Dyakov, K. Berwick, J. Phys. Chem.
C 114 (2010) 16071.
[34] Q. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Appl. Phys. A 91 (2008) 631.
[35] G. Gouadec, Ph. Colomban, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 53 (2007) 1.
[36] J.T. Luxon, D.J. Montgomery, R. Summitt, Phys. Rev. 188 (1969) 1345.
[37] K. Genzel, T.P. Martin, Phys. Status Solidi B 51 (1972) 91.
[38] M. Abdulkhadar, B. Thomas, Nanostruct. Mater. 5 (1995) 289.