Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Republic, 1848, and Napoleon III: Century IX. - Quatrain 5. (I. 261.)
Republic, 1848, and Napoleon III: Century IX. - Quatrain 5. (I. 261.)
Republic, 1848, and Napoleon III: Century IX. - Quatrain 5. (I. 261.)
his uncle Napoleon I. I cannot think it refers to Napoleon II., Duc de Reichstadt. The
entire application of the quatrain is neither very clear nor very important.
The quatrain on Cavaignac, I think, is hardly made out satisfactorily, so I omit it.
Century VIII.--Quatrain 43. [I. 265.]
Par le decide 1 dc deux choses bastards,
Nepveu du sang 2 occupera le regne: 3
Dedans Lectoyre 4 seront les coups de dards,
Nepveu par peur pliera l'enseigne.
Translation.
As to the word Lectoyre, we now know that, if it is to be interpreted at all, it will have
to be found in connection with Sedan,--the noblest reminiscence connected with
which is that it was the birthplace of that great soldier and greater man, Marshal
Turenne. He may well be called La gloire de Sedan, whilst as appropriately may
Napoleon the Little be designated as Cdant de la gloire, with that furled ensign, qu'il
par peur pliera. 1
After much difficulty and searching I have at last come upon two old maps, printed at
Amsterdam by Blaeuw; the one dated 1620 and the other 1650, styled "Les
Soverainetez de Sedan." In both of these the embattled town of Sedan is given, as
seated on the right bank of the river Meuse, whilst on the left bank is shown an
extensive territory named Grand Torcy and Petit Torcy. In another map it is given
as Torsy. These maps give no indication of the points of the compass. But from
another map, indicating them, the river-bend on which the town is seated appears to
run from east to west; and, if so, Torcy lies south or south-west of Sedan. In a more
modern map it appears as Le Grand Torcy and is described as lying "sur la route
impriale de
p. 297
As regards the words "nepveu du sang," there was a caricature very popular in France
at the time of the candidature for the French presidency, consisting of two pictures. In
one the Prince de Joinville was commending himself to the French people for election,
having the young Comte de Paris by the hand, and saying, "I am the uncle of my
nephew." On the other side Louis Napoleon presses his suit by pointing to a statuette
of Napoleon Bonaparte and uttering the words, "I am the nephew of my uncle;"
showing how characteristically nepveu du sang designates Prince Louis Napoleon. He
may almost be said to have chosen it himself as a cognomen.
Century VIII.--Quatrain 44. [I. 267.]
Le procre naturel d'Ogmion 1
De sept neuf du chemin destorner:
A roy de longue amy et 2 au my hom 3
Doit Navarre fort de Pau prosterner.
p. 298
think it is Frederic William, de longue vie, and Bismarck, the bi-valve man, which it
becomes, if we read it as my-homme. I have a great idea that Navarre is a misprint
for le nepveu. Whether fort de Pau may mean with his health re-established by staying
at Pau or not, I cannot say. But, anyhow, I think that the two last lines are to be read
together, and that he is to prostrate himself to the King and his friend. Louis
Napoleon's whole reign must be represented as a failure, if you read it with Le
Pelletier; mine makes it a failure during the last seven to nine years. My King and
friend bring about the catastrophe far below the date that his will do. My emendation
to le nepveu certainly clarifies the meaning. The explanation of Pau is not quite so
comprehensible as I could wish; had Ham been a variant it would have spoken for
itself.
p. 299
The Quatrain 53 of Century VIII., which I have already explained as the flotilla of
Napoleon Bonaparte, M. le Pelletier fixes as the ludicrous Boulogne expedition of
Louis Napoleon, and the Italian campaign after he became Emperor; but I think he
entirely fails in reading the symbols.
Century V.--Quatrain 8. [I. 270.]
Sera laiss feu vif, mort cach,
Dedans les globes, horrible espouvantable,
De nuict a classe 1 cit en poudre lasch,
La cit feu, l'ennemy favourable.
Translation.
Live fire, hidden death, shall be left
In bombs, a horrible and frightful thing:
By a band at night the city shall be fired with powder;
The city seems on fire, it helps though intended to destroy.
Fulminating mercury (feu vif) in bombs in terrible explosion contains death hidden.
The city, Paris, will be startled with powder liberated (lasch, loosed) by assassins by
night. The city will seem on fire. But the enemy (in spite of himself) will prove
favourable to Napoleon. This, of course, is Orsini's attempt of January 14, 1858.
The next verse follows up the thread.
Century V.--Quatrain 9. [I. 271.]
Translation.
When the peristyle is thoroughly demolished
By the chief prisoner, the friend being taken before,
A plot born of the woman, long beard and hairy face;
Then by cunning the leader caught will be executed.
The peristyle (la grand arq') of the opera shall be completely shattered. Pieri, the
friend of Orsini, the chief captive, is seized beforehand by Hbert, head of the
detective service, who recognized him in the crowd. The plot was conceived in the
secret lodges of the Demagoguy [de Dame], whose members wear the beard and hair
long. Orsini, the leader of the whole, will be surprised astutely by the confessions of
Gomez at the restaurant Broggi, whither he had fled, and, being taken, will be
sentenced to death.
I do not feel very confident as to this interpretation, but give it much as I find it in M.
le Pelletier.
Century V.--Quatrain 10. [I. 272.]
Un 1 chef Celtique dans le conflict bless,
Auprs de cave 2 voyant siens mort abbatre,
De sang et playes et d'ennemis press,
Et secours par incogneus 3 de quatre.
Translation.
The Celtic chief is wounded in the strife,
Seeing death strike down his friends near the theatre,
Surrounded with blood and wounds and pressed by enemies,
He escapes the four 4 assassins, by unknown aid.
The Emperor, slightly struck in the eye by a fragment of glass, shall see his people
strewn in death about the entrance of the Grand Opera. Pressed by the conspirators,
four in number, he will receive unknown help; whether of
p. 301
angels or pure spirits, M. le Pelletier cannot quite say. We now know that he had still
to see Sedan; but it would be curious if pure spirits had interested themselves greatly
to protect the cold-blooded murderer of the Champs de Mars. and Coup d'tat.
Century VI.--Quatrain 4. [I. 273.]
Le second chef du regne D'annemarc, 1
Par ceux de Frize 2 et l'Isle Britannique,
Fera despendre 3 plus de cent mille marc, 4
Vain exploicter voyage en Italique.
The second of the Napoleonic race in power will cause England and Hanover to
expend 100,000 marks in fortifications and war material. Fearing invasion after the
Orsini effort, he will then exploit the Italian campaign, though vainly, as he will not
reap the results he looks for.
This corresponds so clearly with what happened that probably most will agree that it
is a very remarkable forecast.
Century III.--Quatrain 37. [I. 274.]
Avant l'assaut l'oraison 5 prononce,
Milan prins 6 d'Aigle par embusches deceus, 7
Muraille antique par canons enfonce,
Par feu et sang mercy pen receus.
Translation.
Before assault a harangue is pronounced;
Lombardy is taken by the eagle, being cut off by ambuscade.
An ancient wall driven in by cannon,
Fire and blood, but little mercy shown.
p. 302
Before the declaration of war, the Emperor will pronounce (January 1, 1859), in the
presence of the diplomatic corps, a threatening discourse against Austria. Lombardy
(Milan, part for the whole) will be ceded by Austria at the Treaty of Zurich (October
17, 1859); Austria, an old wall, will yield to cannon, fire, and blood.
able to lay before the world with its meaning rendered transparent by the
correspondence of interpretation with an event in history. The number of such
correlations of occurrence with forecast falls immensely short of the number of the
quatrains themselves. In fact, only about one hundred and fifty-one, out of a thousand.
The rest give no scintillation as yet, but lie without sign of existence traceable, dead as
a flint, till the iron stroke of Time's heel shall develop the spark. Lateat scintillula
forsan. One or two Presages and two or three Sixains have been also resolved,
Enough, we trust, has been opened up to show what a treasure-house it is that we have
entered into, how rich in curiosity, if in nothing more. What may still lie perdu in the
bulky remainder of eight hundred and fifty it is impossible to say; whether, though
unidentified, they have been realized already, or are yet to bud in the future. If nothing
more be ever done with Nostradamus than this book gives, still the work must for one
reason or other hereafter stand out as the most wonderful book of its kind that was
ever written or printed in this world. It has now to go forth and take its chance, good
or evil, of notice or of neglect amongst the mass of printed matter, largely rubbish,
that deluges our life. It is certainly calculated, so far as it can secure any attention
whatever, to severely shock the prejudices now prevalent amongst mankind. The halfeducated will find it troublesome to read, and disturbing, perhaps, to think about;
whilst the scientific may even denounce it as a locust-cloud of darkness medival in
its tendency. Undoubtedly it must have the effect that Nostradamus in his preface to
his son (see p. 45) says very graphically it will have, "que possible fera retirer le front
quelques uns." Although, as he says again, the forecasts may be
p. 304
clouded, they will be understood by men of sense, and they will grow clearer as
ignorance dies out (see p. 49); which should be our care now.
To all objectors I rejoin, gentlemen, investigate, please, all the points in question as
searchingly as you can; find every fault in my work, and in that of the other
Nostradamic commentators, that you can; expose all that is weak or illusive, wherever
you find it to be so. Let us see, then, how far all the learning and acuteness you can
bring to bear, coupled with whatever established prejudice, and its rancour at being
disturbed in comfortable somnolency, can suggest, to overthrow what other men
heretofore, and I now, have taken so much pains to bring together and give shape to.
Consciously I have not set down a single word with any other desire than that the truth
should prevail; and if your criticism can establish the opposite, I shall still repeat, "Let
truth prevail." But I do not think you can do this: and if not, there is only one other
thing, open to the learned and the wise that can be done,--that is, to rewrite their
philosophies, so as to make room for the reception of this rather awkward piece of
truth that has here got in the way of our old theories, and cannot be got out of the way
again. To the really competent and candid reader I have nothing whatever to add
beyond begging him to refer back to the closing words of my preface, as to him they
will he found to contain my whole and entire message.