DO Retrieved - Asp

PC No.
283/14
Abha Sood vs. State & Ors.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Proxy Counsel Ms. Priyanka Dagar for the plaintiff.

An opportunity has been sought on behalf of petitioner to file
the receipt of cost on record.

Request is allowed.
Meanwhile, the perusal of the record shows that an application
for condonation of delay in filing the process was filed on behalf of
petitioner. The process is also attached with the application. This application
was filed on 09.03.2015. The application was allowed and the petitioner
was directed to file the entire process within 2 days. Steps were not taken by
the petitioner despite such orders.
It is noted that this application for condonation of delay in
filing the process fee has been titled wrongly as delay in filing complaint
case.
Issue notice against the respondents on filing PF/RC/AD and
authorized courier as well as receipt of cost to be filed within 10 days.
Respondent no.2 and 3 be served through the Ministry of Law and
Justice for 27.05.2015.
Citation be also published to the general public in the English
daily newspaper 'The Statesman' on filing of PF and publication charges to
be filed within 10 days.
The publication charges are allowed to be paid on spot. Dasti
be given, if desired.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No.349/14
SBI vs. Badal Bhardwaj
30.03.2015
Present:
Ms Suruchi Mittal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.

Issue court notice to the process server concerned who
served the defendant by way of affixation for 16.07.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 372/14
M/s Goojar Mal Ganpat Rai & Co. Vs. M/s Odeon Builders Pvt. Ltd.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Aditya Jain for the plaintiff.

Ld. Counsels Sh. Shobhit Bhatia and Ms. Sriti Bishoi for
the defendant.
WS was filed on behalf of defendant on 10.03.2015. Copy be
supplied within a week.

Perusal of the record shows that the defendant was served on
24.09.2014. On 25.11.2014, an opportunity was sought on behalf of
defendant to file WS alongwith Vakalatnama and appropriate application for
extension of time. Case was then listed for 22.01.2015. Despite specific
directions, WS was filed only on 10.03.2015 and that too without any
application for extension of time for taking WS on record.
In these circumstances, WS of the defendant cannot be taken
on record. Defence of the defendant is, accordingly, struck off.
Heard. Records perused.
On the basis of pleadings, documents and submissions, I

proceed on to frame the following issues:Issues :1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest, if so and what rate and
what period? OPP
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief claimed? OPP
3. Relief.
No other issues arise or has been pressed.
Let list of witnesses be filed by the plaintiff within 15 days
with copies to the opposite counsel. Put up for PE by way of affidavit with
Contd...2/-
-2-
an advance copy to opposite counsel within 15 days prior to next date of

hearing. List this case on 04.08.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 156/14
Ravinder Kishan Chand vs. Nirmala Bhagwan
30.03.2015
Present:
Plaintiff/ PW1 in person.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Mayank Sapra for the defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Ld.
Counsel for defendant submits that he has been engaged recently. An

adjournment has been sought on this ground to cross-examine the
PW1.
Put up on 16.04.2015 for cross-examination of PW1.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No.67/14
All India Women's Conference vs. Ganga Prasad Tiwari & Ors.
30.03.2015
Statement of PW1 Mrs. Bina Jain W/o late Sh. S.P. Jain, R/o B-117,
Nirman Vihar, Delhi-110092 (Former President of Plaintiff).
ON SA
I tender my evidence by way of affidavit which is Ex.P1 and
bears my signatures at points A and B. The contents of my affidavit
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Copy of certified
copy of Certificate of Registration of Societies dated 18.07.1930 is
Ex.PW1/A (Original certified copy seen and returned). Extract of
the Minutes of the half yearly Standing Committee held on 15.06.2013
is Ex.PW1/B (Original Minutes of Book seen and returned).
Certified copy of Indenture dated 22.10.1962 is Ex.PW1/C (OSRoriginal also produced). Site plan of servant quarter No.6/6 made by
Milind Upadhye is Ex.PW1/D. Office copy of Legal notice dated
04.06.2013 alongwith two original postal receipts are Ex.PW1/E
(colly.). Closed envelopes vide which the legal notices 04.06.2013 to
the two defendants were sent by speed post and were returned
unserved are Ex. PW1/F (colly).
XXXXX by Ld. Counsel for both the defendants, Sh. Vishal
Chaturvedi.
Q.
What is the appointment procedure in AIWC?
Ans. There is no written procedure earlier. I do not recall since when

was the written procedure applied. In the relevant time in respect of
the present suit, no written letter for appointment was issued to the
employee as the plaintiff organization was a very small one.
Q.
Mrs. Bina Jain, when is associated with this AIWC?
Ans. I had been associated with this organization since early of 1960.
Q.
Do you know Mr. Ram Surat Tiwari when joined this
organization?
Ans. I do not remember when Ram Surat Tiwari joined our
organization.
Q.
As a licence fees, how much amount have you been charging
from your employee since 2004?

Ans. I do not remember.
Q.
Do you have ever inquired that late Sh. Ram Surat Tiwari what
are doing in the day time?

Ans. I do not know.
Q.
Why you stopped the services of Mr. Ganga Prasad Tiwari
(defendant no.1) in 2004?

Ans. We had information that defendant no.1 used to bring outsiders
in the hostel and also indulge in nefarious activities such as drinking
liquor etc. which was bad for security of the hostel. Therefore, his
services were stopped in the year 2004.
Further cross-examination of witnesses is deferred.
RO & AC
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 137/14
Paras Polymers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ardee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsels Sh. Rama Shanker and Sh. Shivam Garg for
plaintiff.
Sh. Ashok Jain, Director of plaintiff company.
Ld. Counsels Sh. Alok Prakash and Sh. Ashok Chhabra
for the defendant.
An application u/s 151 CPC was filed on behalf of
plaintiff on 02.02.2015. Its reply has been filed today. Copy supplied.
Arguments heard.
Put up for orders on 16.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 1247/14
Edu Smart Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. FR. Angnel School
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Nitin Bhatia for the petitioner.

Part submissions heard.
An opportunity has been sought to made further
submissions on the basis of certain case laws.

The Request is allowed.
Put up for further arguments on the petition on
06.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 210/14
M/s Steam and Sauna Paradise Ltd. vs. M/s Pearls Infrastructure
Project Ltd.
30.03.2015
File has been taken up today on an application of the plaintiff
Under Order 38 Rule 1 & 5 CPC.
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Amit Goel for the plaintiff.

Heard. Record perused.
Issue notice of this application Under Order 38 Rule 1 &
5 CPC against the defendants on filing of PF/RC/AD/ authorized

courier to be filed within one week.
Put up for date fixed i.e. 08.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No.1803/14
Indiabulls Securities Ltd. vs. DVR Logistics and Trucking
30.03.2015
Present:
AR of petitioner Sh. Uttam Kumar.

Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of
respondent. It is submitted that respondent has not taken any steps for
settling the matter. The respondent has also not filed its fresh address
in Address Form as directed on 02.02.2015. In the facts and
circumstances of the case and keeping in view that the respondent is
aware of the pendency of the present proceedings, the ex-parte order
dated 24.12.2014 is confirmed with same terms and conditions as
mentioned in this order.
The present case is disposed of and file be consigned to
record room accordingly.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No. 1786/14
Indusind Bank Ltd. vs. HANIF
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Ashok Kumar for the petitioner.

Last and final opportunity is granted to the petitioner to
file the documents to show that the Arbitration proceedings have

commenced.
In the meantime, issue fresh notice to the respondent on
filing of PF/ RC/ AD/ authorised courier as well as fresh address to be
filed in one week for 21.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
Arb. No. 1745/14

Fitwell Construction (P) Ltd. vs. Andritz Hydro (P) Ltd. & Anr.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. D.K. Tiwari for the petitioner.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Sourabh Leekha for the respondent no.1.
Ld. Counsel Sh. A.P. Sathya Murthy for the respondent
no.2.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 submits that he shall file
his vakalatnama alongwith reply on the next date of hearing.

Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner submits that the main
counsel is in personal difficulty and is out of station. An adjournment
is sought on this ground. An opportunity is also been sought to file the
application Under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC by respondents. Ld.
Counsel of respondent no.1 as opposed the adjournment.
However, in view of personal difficulty of the main
counsel for petitioner, the request is allowed.
Put up for reply, if any as well as arguments on the
present petition on 27.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
Arb. No. 1294/14

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited vs. Vinod
Yadav
30.03.2015
Present:
Sh. Gulshan Kumar, AR for petitioner company.

Respondents in person.
Settlement is going on.
Heard. Record perused.
The interim order dated 31.10.2014 to continue till next
date of hearing.
Put up on 15.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No.67/14
All India Women's Conference vs. Ganga Prasad Tiwari & Ors.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Hemant Yadav for the plaintiff.

Ld. Counsels Sh. Vishal Chaturvedi and Sh. Sumit Rana
for the defendants.
PW1 in person.
Vide separate statement, PW1 has tendered her affidavit
in evidence. Documents have been exhibited. PW1 has been party

cross-examined.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW1 on
12.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/NDD/PHC
30.03.2015
CS No.72/14
Hari Simran Singh Sandhu & Anr Vs Atul Bhargava & Ors
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. Shantnu Aggarwal for defendants

no. 1 to 3.
The matter is under stay of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
Put up for further proceedings on 20.07.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
ADJ-03/PHC/NEW DELHI.
30.03.2015
(At 10.45 AM)
At this stage, Ld. Counsel Sh. Ishan Khanna for the
plaintiffs has appeared. He has been apprised of the order.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.68/14
All India Women's Conference VS Sadhu Singh Rawat
30.03.2015
Present:

Ms. Veena Kohli, President of A.I.W.C, for plaintiff
society.
Ld. Counsels Sh. Vishal Chaturvedi and Sh. Sumit Rana
for the defendants no.1 and 2.
Defendants no.1 and 2 in person.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed by Ld counsel for the
defendants. An application for condonation of delay in filing the WS

on behalf of defendant no.2 filed. Copy supplied. I have heard the
arguments on this application. Ld counsel for the plaintiff has
vehemently opposed this application on the ground that the defendant
no.2 is deliberately trying to delay the matter.
There is a delay of 37 days in filing the WS on behalf of
defendant no.2 who was impleaded as defendant no.2 upon his
application u/O 1 rule 10 CPC.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and for the just
and proper adjudication of this suit, the Court is convinced that an
Contd...2/-
-2-
opportunity should be granted to defendant no.2 to put his defence

forth. The application of defendant no.2 is, therefore, allowed
subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff.
The application U/Sec 5 of the Limitation Act is
allowed and, thus, disposed of. WS is taken on record subject to
payment of cost.
Put up for replications, if any, admissions/denial of
documents, if any, framing of issues and payment of cost by defendant
no.2 to the plaintiff on 11.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.73/14
All India Women's Conference VS Niranjan Kumar Dubey
30.03.2015
Present:

Ms. Veena Kohli, President of A.I.W.C, for plaintiff
society.
Ld. Counsel Sh. Mukesh Kumar Yadav for the applicant.
Applicant Smt. Rekha Pandey in person.
Defendant is ex parte.
Ld counsel for the applicant has sought another
opportunity to move an appropriate application for condonation of

delay in filing the review application as well as for arguments.
Let advance copy of the same be provided to the opposite
counsel atleast one week prior to the next date of hearing.
Put up for arguments on 11.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.106/14
Piggery Farm Vs Kaviar Hospitality Pvt Ltd & Anr
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsels Sh. Vibhor Bogga and Sh. Shobit Bhatia for
the defendants.
An application U/Sec 151 CPC has been moved on behalf
of the defendants wherein its mentioned that the complete set of the
plaint and documents have not been supplied. Plaintiff is directed to
supply the same to Ld counsel for the defendants within one week
from today.
The application U/Sec 151 CPC of the defendants is,
thus, disposed of.
Let WS be filed within 30 days from the date of receiving
the documents.
Put up on 21.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.44/14
Vir Bahadur VS Sushma Verma & Ors
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Devraj Singh for the plaintiff.

Plaintiff in person.
Ld. Proxy Counsels Sh. Shobhit Bhatia and Ms. Sriti
Biroi for defendants.
I have heard the arguments on behalf of the plaintiff on
the defendant's application U/Sec 151 CPC for placing on record

certain documents. The defendants are at liberty to address their
arguments on the next date of hearing.
Put up for same as well as orders on 20.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.03/14
Dev Ranjan Mittra VS The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra,
ND.
30.03.2015
Statement of Sh. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate, Enrol. No. D/617/92,
Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
At Bar
I have the instructions of the appellant to withdraw the present
appeal as the appellant has been granted vacancy remission by the
NDMC. The present appeal may be disposed of as withdrawn.
RO&AC
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.03/14
Dev Ranjan Mittra VS The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra,
ND.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Jasmeet Singh for the appellant.

Ld. Counsel Sh. D.P Pande for the respondent.
I have heard the arguments on the application of the
respondent for recalling the order dated 03.02.2015 for waiver of the
cost imposed on the 03.01.2015. I have perused the records carefully.
The contention of the respondent is that the previous
counsel for the respondent has been depaneled. Further, inadvertently,
the dates could not be communicated to the respondent. The
respondent has, therefore, prayed for waiver of the cost imposed on
the NDMC.
On 03.01.2015, it was observed by the Court that despite
specific direction the respondent did not appoint any responsible
officer to make categoric submissions on appeal on behalf of the
NDMC. A cost of Rs. 1,000/- was, therefore, imposed on the NDMC
and it was further directed that this cost be deducted from the salary of
the person/official responsible for the non compliance of the Court's
order dated 28.08.2014.
In view of the submissions of the respondent in the
application as well as in view of the fact that the appeal is being
Contd...2/-
-2-
pursued by NDMC properly, the Court deems it fit to waive the cost
imposed on NDMC on 03.01.2015. The application of NDMC is
disposed of as allowed. The cost is waived.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that
he has the instructions of the appellant to withdraw the present appeal
as the appellant has been granted vacancy remission by the NDMC.
Separate statement of Ld. Counsel has been recorded today.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present
petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.02/14
Dr Indraneel VS The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra, ND.
30.03.2015
Statement of Sh. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate, Enrol. No. D/617/92,
Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
At Bar
I have the instructions of the appellant to withdraw the present
appeal as the appellant has been granted vacancy remission by the
NDMC. The present appeal may be disposed of as withdrawn.
RO&AC
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.02/14
Dr Indraneel VS The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra, ND.
30.03.2015
Present:

the NDMC.
Contd...2/-
-2-
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that
he has the instructions of the appellant to withdraw the present appeal
as the appellant has been granted vacancy remission by the NDMC.
Separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the appellant has been recorded
today.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present
appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record room.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.113/14
ICICI Bank Vs Citi Bank Ltd
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsels Sh. Joydip Bhattacharya and Sh. Prashant

Chandra for the plaintiff.
AR Sh. Subodh Sharma, Manger in ICICI Bank.
Ld. Counsels Sh. Alok Tiwari and Ms. Archana Lakhotia
for defendant no.1.
Ld. Counsel Sh. Saurabh Soni for defendant no.3.
Detailed arguments on behalf of the plaintiff and
defendant no.1 on the plaintiffs application u/O 12 rule 6 CPC heard.

An opportunity is granted to defendant no.3 to make
further submissions, if any, on this application.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.01/14
A.B Mittra VS The Chairperson, NDMC
30.03.2015
Present:

the NDMC.
Contd...2/-
-2-
I have heard detailed arguments on the present appeal. At
request, the parties are granted at liberty to file their documents as
well as case laws in their favour before the next date of hearing.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
RCA No.16/14
Ashok Kumar Joshi Vs The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. R.K Sonkiya for the appellant.

Appellant in person.
Sh. Sanjay Sharma, Bailiff in the office of Collector of
Stamps.
Despite categoric directions dated 18.10.2014, the
Collector of Stamps did not appoint any responsible officer to address

the clarifications sought by this Court on 18.10.2014.
One page written submission has been filed on behalf of
the respondent. Copy supplied. However, no submissions have been
made in respect of the clarifications sought by this Court on
18.10.2014.
Issue a show cause notice to the Collector of Stamps
directing him to explain as to why the order dated 18.10.2014 has not
been complied with till date. Copy of the order dated 18.10.2014 be
also attached with the show cause notice.
Dasti copy be given to both the parties.
Put up for further consideration on 18.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.121/14
Metso Minerals (India) Pvt Ltd VS Hari Machined Ltd
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Tushar Gupta for the defendant.

None for the plaintiff.
It is 12.30 pm. Despite repeated calls, none has appeared
on behalf of the plaintiff to address arguments on defendant's

application u/O 9 rule 7 CPC. I am not inclined to grant any further
opportunity to the plaintiff for this purpose. I shall dispose of this
application on the basis of the record. I have heard the arguments of
Ld counsel for the defendant and have perused the records carefully.
The case of the defendant is that talks of settlement were
going on between the parties and the plaintiff assured the defendant
that he need not appear before the Court and also need not worry
about the next dates and hearing or any adverse order that may be
passed. The plaintiff has denied these averments in its reply wherein it
is mentioned for all talks of compromise took place between the
parties prior to filing of the suit.
No doubt, the Court agrees with the contention of the
plaintiff that it was the duty of the defendant to be careful and find out
Contd...2/-
-2-
what is going on in the case, the Court is convinced that for the just
and proper adjudication of the present suit, an opportunity should be
granted to the defendant to put its defence forth.
In these circumstances, the ex parte order dated
16.04.2014 is set aside subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to
the plaintiff. The application u/O 9 rule 7 CPC of the defendant is,
thus, disposed of.
Let WS be filed within 30 days from today with copy to
the opposite counsel.
Put up on 27.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
RCA No.24/14
Satyawati VS Sudesh Gautam & Ors.
30.03.2015
Present:
Appellant in person.
Ld. Counsel Sh. V.P Singh Bidhuri for the respondents.
It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that because of
personal difficulty main counsel is not available today.

One last and final opportunity is granted to the appellant
to address arguments.
Put up for arguments on the application of the appellant
for waiver of cost as well as for condonation of delay in filing the
present appeal on 02.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.1508/14
ESS Infrastructure Ltd VS Religare Finvest Ltd
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Amandeep Joshi for the petitioner.

Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. Radheshyam for the respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that the main
counsel is not available today because of personal difficulty.

Last and final opportunity is granted to the respondent.
Put up for arguments on 11.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
(At 1.00 PM)
At this stage, Ld. Counsel Sh. Ajay Uppal for the
respondent has appeared. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the
respondent. He has been apprised of the order.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.1783/1, 1784/14 & 1785/14

Citicorp Finance India VS
30.03.2015
Statement of Sh. Avinash Kumar, Advocate, Enrol. No. D1046/97(R), Ld. Counsel for the petitioner company.
At Bar
I have the instructions of the petitioner company to withdraw
the present petition.
The present petition may be disposed of as
withdrawn.
RO&AC
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.1783/1, 1784/14 & 1785/14

Citicorp Finance India VS
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Avinash Kumar for the petitioner.

Pre-Lok Adalat sitting held.
I have heard Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and have
considered the matter. Records perused carefully.

The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that now
petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. Separate statement
of Ld. Counsel has been recorded today.
Matter now is referred to National Lok Adalat scheduled
to be held on 11.04.2015 for further consideration.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
RCA No.01/15
Dharambir Singh VS Union of India & Ors
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. H.S Dahiya for the appellant.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Ramesh Chandra for all the respondents.
Sh R.S. Nagi, Assistant Commandant, CISF.
Ld counsel for the appellant submits that he is in personal
difficulty today. The request for adjournment is allowed.

Put up for arguments on appeal on 13.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.1183/14
HDFC Bank Ltd VS Harnam Singh
30.03.2015
Statement of Sh. Kumar Ranjit, Advocate, Enrol. No. BR2434/2012, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner company.
At Bar
I have the instructions of the petitioner company to withdraw
the present petition.
The present petition may be disposed of as
withdrawn.
RO&AC
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.1183/14
HDFC Bank Ltd VS Harnam Singh
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Kumar Ranjit for the petitioner.

Pre-Lok Adalat sitting held.
I have heard Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and have
considered the matter. Records perused carefully.

The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that now
petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. Separate statement
of Ld. Counsel has been recorded today.
Matter now is referred to National Lok Adalat scheduled
to be held on 11.04.2015 for further consideration.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.423/14, 428/14, 427/14, 430/14 & 536/14

Religare Finvest Ltd Vs
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Proxy Counsel Ms. Komal Khandelwal for the

petitioner.
It is submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the
present petition.
Put up for appearance of the AR/main counsel for the
petitioner and recording of the statement on 17.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.297/14
Gulab Rai Khanchandani VS Ashok Ahuja & Anr
30.03.2015
File has been taken up today on an application of the
plaintiff for summoning the record as mentioned in the
application.
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. J.S Garkal for the plaintiff.

List of witnesses has also been filed within time on behalf
of the plaintiff on 27.03.2015. It is submitted that the copy has been

supplied to the opposite counsel by post.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the record
as mentioned in the application for summoning the witnesses be
summoned on filing of PF to be filed within a week.
Diet money is allowed to be paid on the spot.
Put up on date fixed, that is, 27.07.2015 for purpose
fixed.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
Arb No.109/15
Reliance Capital Ltd VS Vishnu Kumar
30.03.2015
Fresh arbitration petition U/sec. 9 of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act received today on assignment. It be checked
and registered.
Present:
Ld. Counsels Sh. Harsh Sinha and Ms. Prerana

for the petitioner.
Put up for consideration on 01.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
HTA No.04/14
Jaytee Pvt Ltd VS NDMC
30.03.2015
Present:

Vide a separate order of even date, dictated to the Steno,
the application u/sec 117 of the NDMC Act of the appellant has been,
disposed of.
The delay in filing the present appeal has been
condoned subject to compliance of Section 116 (b) of the Act
within two weeks from today.
Put up for arguments on the application U/Sec 115 and
116 of the NDMC Act of the appellant as well as appeal on
24.04.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
CS No.116/14
Davinder Kumar Bhalla VS M/s Boutique Hotels India Pvt Ltd
30.03.2015
Present:
None.
Owing to paucity of time, the orders could not be

prounounced today.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015
TM No.332/14
M/s Universal EventsTix Pvt Ltd VS TenX Technology Solutions
& Ors.
30.03.2015
Present:
Ld. Counsel Sh. Himanshu Deora for the plaintiff.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Mohan Bhadana for defendants no.1 and
2.
Vide a separate order of even date, dictated to the Steno,

the application u/O 7 rule 11 CPC of defendants no.1 and 2 has been
dismissed.
Put up for admission/denial of documents, if any, framing
of issues on 13.05.2015.
(VRINDA KUMARI)
30.03.2015

DO Retrieved - Asp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

DO Retrieved - Asp

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DO Retrieved - Asp

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PC No.

Ld. Proxy Counsel Ms. Priyanka Dagar for the plaintiff.

the receipt of cost on record.

Ms Suruchi Mittal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.

served the defendant by way of affixation for 16.07.2015.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Aditya Jain for the plaintiff.

supplied within a week.

On the basis of pleadings, documents and submissions, I

an advance copy to opposite counsel within 15 days prior to next date of

Plaintiff/ PW1 in person.

Counsel for defendant submits that he has been engaged recently. An

What is the appointment procedure in AIWC?

Ans. There is no written procedure earlier. I do not recall since when

Mrs. Bina Jain, when is associated with this AIWC?

Do you know Mr. Ram Surat Tiwari when joined this

As a licence fees, how much amount have you been charging

from your employee since 2004?

are doing in the day time?

Why you stopped the services of Mr. Ganga Prasad Tiwari

(defendant no.1) in 2004?

Ld. Counsel Sh. Nitin Bhatia for the petitioner.

submissions on the basis of certain case laws.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Amit Goel for the plaintiff.

5 CPC against the defendants on filing of PF/RC/AD/ authorized

AR of petitioner Sh. Uttam Kumar.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Ashok Kumar for the petitioner.

file the documents to show that the Arbitration proceedings have

Arb. No. 1745/14

Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. D.K. Tiwari for the petitioner.

his vakalatnama alongwith reply on the next date of hearing.

Arb. No. 1294/14

Sh. Gulshan Kumar, AR for petitioner company.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Hemant Yadav for the plaintiff.

in evidence. Documents have been exhibited. PW1 has been party

Ld. Proxy Counsel Sh. Shantnu Aggarwal for defendants

Ld. Counsel Sh. Hemant Yadav for the plaintiff.

defendants. An application for condonation of delay in filing the WS

opportunity should be granted to defendant no.2 to put his defence

Ld. Counsel Sh. Hemant Yadav for the plaintiff.

opportunity to move an appropriate application for condonation of

Ld. Counsel Sh. Devraj Singh for the plaintiff.

the defendant's application U/Sec 151 CPC for placing on record

Ld. Counsel Sh. Jasmeet Singh for the appellant.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Jasmeet Singh for the appellant.

Ld. Counsels Sh. Joydip Bhattacharya and Sh. Prashant

defendant no.1 on the plaintiffs application u/O 12 rule 6 CPC heard.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Jasmeet Singh for the appellant.

Ld. Counsel Sh. R.K Sonkiya for the appellant.

Collector of Stamps did not appoint any responsible officer to address

Ld. Counsel Sh. Tushar Gupta for the defendant.

on behalf of the plaintiff to address arguments on defendant's

personal difficulty main counsel is not available today.

Ld. Counsel Sh. Amandeep Joshi for the petitioner.

counsel is not available today because of personal difficulty.

Arb No.1783/1, 1784/14 & 1785/14

The present petition may be disposed of as

Arb No.1783/1, 1784/14 & 1785/14