Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proof: Suppose That A
Proof: Suppose That A
Proof: Suppose That A
5 Suppose that
0= i , V >
< i , 1 1+ 2 2 ++ n n>
< i , 1 1>+ + 1 , n n >
1 < i , 1>+ + 1< i , 1>+ n < i , n >
1 0++ 1 < i , 1>+ + n 0
1 < i , 1>
Since
equation
gives
i , 1 0.
Thus the
1, 2 , , n are linearly
independent, as desired. //
Consider two vectors
u , R2 .
u cos
projection of the vector u onto the vector . (See the figure on the next page). Consequently, the
projection of u onto [denoted proj (u)] is the vector
u cos
( )= ucos
1
That
projv ( u )=
u v cos
v
u
u.v u.v
=
v
2
u v .v
is pictured below
u proj v ( u )
projection of u onto v by
u<, v > v
u<, v>
projv ( u )=
Observe in the picture above that the vector
is a general fact about inner product spaces, whose (purely algebraic) proof is given next.
Lemma 4.1.7 Whenner
( projv ( u ) )
are orthogonal.
v , v > v>
u , v>
u ,u proj v ( u )= u , u
v , v> v >
u,v>
<u , u> v ,
v , v >< v , v >
u , v >
< u ,u>
<u , u> u , v >
0
In euclidean space, Rn , we have that
v . v= v
1
2
v + w 2= v 2+ w 2 . This
norm on V. In order to prove Theorem 4.1.10, we need the following theorem, which is a useful result
in its own right.
Theorem 4.1.9 (Schwarz Inequality) Suppose that V is a real inner product space with inner product
< , >. For ,
u , v V ,
u , v > u . v
Equality holds if and only if
Proof : If
definite property of < , > together with the linearity of inner products, we have:
projv ( u ) is a scalar
v , v> v >
u , v >
<u , u> v ,
v , v >< v , v >
u,v>
< u ,u>
u , v >
<u , u>
Hence ,
u , v >
u , v >
Multiplying this inequality by the positive real number u , v > shows that
.
u ,u> v , v >
The inequality of the theorem follows taking by square roots.
In case
product we have
that is,
theorem is proved.
We now show that the norm associated with a real inner product astisfies all the consitions
given in Definition 4.1.1. This result is well know for the standard inner product on R n. Many of the
important applications of this result are to the infinite-dimensional case. We give a glimpse of such
uses in Secs. 7.3 and 7.4.
1
:V R defined by = v , v 2
is a norm on V
Proof :
(i)
v V , k R , we find that
For
kv = kv ,kv
1
2
k < v , kv
2
k < v , kv
k <v , v 2
k . v
(ii)
Let
u , v V . Then
u + v 2=u+ v , u+v >
<u , u>+ u , v >+ v , u>+ u , v >
<u , u>+2<u , v >+ v , v>
2
u + 2u v + v
v
u +
f ( x ) , g ( x )> f ( x ) g ( x ) dx
0
Must satisfy Schwarz inequality. Written out explicitly, we obtain that for all
1
1
2
1
2
)(
1
2
f ( x ) g ( x ) dx f ( x ) dx g ( x) dx
0
f ( x ) g ( x ) V :
1
2
In order to see how useful the techniques of linear algebra are, we invite the reader to try to prove this
result using only the tools of calculus. The norm associated with this inner product is the norm
described in Example 4.1.2 (iv).
We now turn to the case of inner products on complex vector spaces. The situasition is
remarkably similar to the case of real inner products. In fact, in the remaining sections of this chapter,
whenever possible these two cases will be treated simultaneously. After giving the definition of
complex inner product, we will repeat the proofs od Lemma 4.1.7 and Theorems 4.1.9 and 4.1.10. we
do this so that the reader can spot precisely where the difference are.
If
a+bi C
where
a+bi is a+bi=abi .
Two important properties of complex conjugation we need are that for all
r , s C , r +s=r + sr . s=r . s
Definition 4.1.3 Let V be a complex vector space. A complex (or hermitian) inner product on V is a
complex-valued function on VxV, usually denoted by < , > which satiesfies:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
It is customary to refer to the vector space V, together with some complex inner product < , > as a
hermitian inner product space. A finite-dimensional complex inner product space is called a unitary
space.