Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 Kpca 2011 (Sslee)
4 Kpca 2011 (Sslee)
April, 21 2011
Sang Soo LEE
ISUPETASYS
Contents
Interconnection Reliability
Next Page
Interconnection Reliability
General Specification
Market Characteristics
11 of 12 = 91.6%
yield, 3
3~4
4 cores
0%, 8 + cores
Next Page
Reliability
System Roadmap
Product
Technology
gy
Router
Band Width
Serial Data Rate
S
Server
Clock Speed
2009
2010
2011
2012
10Gbps
20Gbps
40Gbps
6.25Gbps
10Gbps
20Gbps
2Gh
2Ghz
2 5Gh
2.5Ghz
3 5Gh
3.5Ghz
Environmental Regulation
- Lead Free
- ROHS
Interconnection Reliability
- IST
- CAF
2.SignalInt
2
SignalInt
egrity
1.Routing
Density
Higher Data
Rate &
Clock
Speed
p
3.Environment
al Regulation
4.Interconnectio
n Reliability
10
Next Page
Reliability
Markets
Market
s
Needs
Low Cost
11
12
Tier 3~5 laminates are gaining an increasing share of the market for
high-speed applications (Low Dk / Low Df)
Source by IPC
13
What is a difference?
Should use a lead free alloys
y instead of Sn/Pb alloys.
y
SAC Solder need more higher reflow temperatures. Up to 20C higher
Reflow Type
Solder Type
Sn/Pb Reflow
Eutectic Solder
183
210~240
Lead-Free
Lead
Free Reflow
217
240~260
240
260
JEDEC Profile
(J-STD-020C)
Upper line: Lead free Reflow
Lower line: Sn/Pb Reflow
14
Test Items
Test Vehicle
CTE
3.7%
3.0%
3.5%
TMA (Tg)
170.0
170.0
170.0
TGA (Td)
325.0
350.0
365.0
T260
4min ~ 8min
Over 60min
Over 30min
T288
2min
Over 10min
Over 10min
15
Layer Count
16L
16L
16L
Overall Thickness
2.38mm (9.4mil)
2.38mm (9.4mil)
2.38mm (9.4mil)
CTEBGA Area
3.31%
3.52%
2.88%
176.6
176.2
200.6
T260-Clad
3.5 min
Over 20 min
Over 20 min
T288-Clad
0 min
3.58 min
1.63 min
Dicy Cured170
Layer Count
28L
28L
28L
Overall Thickness
3.0mm (118mil)
3.0mm(118mil)
3.0mm(118mil)
CTEBGA Area
3.83%
3.65%
3.35%
TMATgBGA Area
163 4
163.4
161 0
161.0
177 4
177.4
TGA (Td)
312.5
328.0
338.8
T260-Clad
3.2 min
Over 20 min
12.85 min
T288-Clad
T288
Clad
0 min
2.2 min
0 min
Lead-Free Reflow 5X
Fail
Pass
Fail
16
Evaluation report shows a little bit difference between raw material and PCBs.
PCBs
Basically, Thermal reliability is affected by board design (Layer Count,Thickness)
17
Key Point 2.
2 Finer line width
Signal line width tolerance 10% 7%
Signal line width 3/3 mil will cause drastic
Yield drop
p
Road Map
Internal Lines & Spaces
External Lines & Spaces
BGA Ball Pitch (Goal)
1.0mm 3 lines
0.8mm 2 lines
2011
3 / 4 mil
3.5/4 mil
2012
3/3mil
18
Key Point
Signal D2M
Annular ring + Spacing
Prepreg
Drill
Plane D2M
Anti pad Size
Prepreg
2011
7mil
2012
6mil
Pattern
ThinCore
Using
U i S
Smallest
ll t Drill
D ill size
i as 6~10mil
6 10 il
Keep upgrade Registration Capability
2011
2012
22mil
20mil
19
Staggered Via
(1~3L)
Buried Via
Hole (2~25L)
Buried Via
Core (13~14L)
Key Point
Registration within 3mil
- PEP, Registration Validation Coupon
Plated inner layer yield control
Control copper thickness on plated signal layers
Laser drilling
- Remove smear with normal prepreg
Standard glass
Spread glass
The fixed energy can not Exactly fit the poor area
(arrow1) & the glass rich area (arrow2) at the same time
20
<BGA Area>
Smaller components
Merits
Provides a flat coplanar surface
Make routing easier and more traces on PCB
Increase component density
Potential EMI. SI benefits
Help thermal management
A llower costt & risk
i k off soldering
ld i problem
bl
<PTH N
Normal>
l>
<VIP>
21
Key Point
Pull the wire vertically by using a 50kg load at 10 cm / minute
Until the pad is peeled off and record the load percentage.
Average force of 250 Newtons/Sq.cm [~360 Pounds-force/Sq]
S/N1,Condor #3
@20X Magnification
S/N1,Condor
,
#4
@20X Magnification
S/N2,Condor
,
#6
@20X Magnification
22
Failure Mode
Specification
Planarization
Dimple
Air Pocket
Dimple
Note
Under 5%
(Via Hole Dimension)
Under 50um
Normal
None
None
Stric (Mil/Areo)
Specification
23
35-45
30-40
30-40
35-45
90days
90days
60days
90days
141
168
160
170
ppm/
39
39
32
24
ppm/
143
105
83
70
25
MPa
7200
5200
8600
8500
100
5800
4300
6200
6700
150
820
2600
4300
5300
200
340
870
2600
1300
250
280
660
2100
700
V Type Viscosity
Pas/25
10
Shelf Life
5
Tg (TMA)
CTE
Absorptance
Dill Size
P C k
Pan-Cake
JISC6481
0.23
0.16
0.15
0.15
Avg
4~5
2~3
2~3
22.5
15
17.5
17.5
100
100
100
100
94V-0
94V-0
94V-0
94V-0
400
670
900
400
8010
11010
15030
14030
PCB
11060
15030
FCPKG)
11060
15030
11060
15030
Max
%
UL
Peel Strength
Curing Condition
g/cm
min
24
Trends : Aspect ratio(DHS) which are Conventional boards will be increased about 13:1 in near term.
Request : Increasing Layer counts and Routing Density, It is caused for plating capability to enhances high
Aspect ratio Board Reliability.
21:1
18:1
15:1
2012~2016
2010~2011
2008~2009
2006~2007
Aspect Ratio
Trend
- Use RPP and optimize a RPP parameter for thick
Plating copper thickness
12:1
13:1
9:1
6:1
3:1
12:1
11:1
10:1
0
2006~2007
2008~2009 2010~2011
2012~2016
State of arts boards may have more high aspect ratio (18:1~24:1)
25
3-2. Desmear
Trends : The low Dk/Df Material construction challenge and the fluidity challenge of high aspect ratio hole
- To improve
impro e a Signal integrit
integrity, generall
generally use
se lo
low Dk/Df Material
- High Aspect ratio drop the fluidity.
Request : Because of low Dk/Df Material use and high aspect ratio, Desmear process must be setup for
new material.
- Consider plasma machine for de-smear, because gas fluidity is better than liquid and
Have a better etch rate (Positive etch back).
Trends : As required lead free conditions, a raw material of low Dk/Df need a stronger for heat.
Based on this requirements
req irements of market,
market low
lo Dk/Df material added a filler construction
constr ction in resin.
resin
26
27
Test Panel Spec.
-Nelco4 000-13SI
-Layer Count: 28L
-Board Thick.:196mil
-DHS:10.8mil
-MVH:8mil
-DHS A/R:17.8:1
Cu plating Capability
Cu plating thickness in PTH (DHS 10.8mil)
<Target:1.1mil, min.avg.1.0mil, min:0.8mil>
Min:1.02mil, Max:1.32mil, Avg:1.14mil
C plating
Cu
l ti
thi
thickness
k
iin MVH (size:8mil)
( i 8 il)
Min:1.46mil, Max:1.78mil, Avg:1.57mil
Reliability
y Thermal Stress ((3X,6X)
, )
Item
3X PTH
3X MVH
6X PTH
6X MVH
Delamination
Wicking(mil)
Hole Roughness(mil)
Nail Head(%)
Smear
( )
Resin Recession(%)
Pull away
Copper Crack
None
1.52
0.27
132.4%
None
3.4%
None
None
None
0.6
None
None
None
None
1.41
0.29
127.8%
None
4.7%
None
None
None
0.76
None
None
None
28
5Gbps
FR 4
FR-4
Nelco N4000-6
Isola FR406
Panasonic R-1766
Nelco N4000-13
Isola FR408HR
Panasonic Megtron4
g
10Gbps
20Gbps
29
Key Point
Using
the
weave
U i
th high
hi h density
d
it off special
i l glass
l
Make Dk/Df variation instability.
Thickness is thinner because of yarn is spread out
The gap is smaller than normal type
#106, #1080 => #1067,1078
Confidential
4-3.Back Drilling
Required : Capacity launches can act as low-pass filter,
the effect of which is top
p rohibit the
transmission of high frequencies (Stub Effect)
Stub
Length
Key Point
Only incremental improvements on the PCB for
Signal speed increasing
Yield and quality control for single & multiple depth
Depth tolerance is changed from 254um to 127um
Back drilling positioning
1~4L
4~26L
4~26L
30
Confidential
31
32
Key Point
How to handle while proceed thinner core
between inner to press process
Control
C t l Hi-pot
Hi
t test
t t conditions
diti
Registration
Incoming Inspection
I/L Prep
Hi Pot Test
For Inner-layer Boards
Customer
Condition
Ultra Flex line
(1mil Core Compatible line)
Large H
Hole
Smallestvi
a
BC 24um
Horizontal Oxide
Lamination &
Electrical Test
DES Line
(Cupric Acid)
Hi Pot Test
For Finished Boards
Customer
Condition
33
Port2
Port1
34
Next Page
Interconnection Reliability
35
Key Point
Conventional Reliability Test Method has
long term and Random selection to verify
- Thermal Stress
- Thermal Shock
Needs: Want to guarantee Long term Reliability
Conventional Reliability Test Method are changed by
electrical test method in easy & high reliability such as
- IST
- CAF
ICDs
36
5-5. C-SAM
37
Conclusion
Future Challenges
High speed serial link electrical packaging challenges due to Increasing data rates
Special
p
Impedance
p
Connectors(7%
(
~ 5%))
Back drilling of vias at the PTH connectors will be challenge
Common mode noise due to phase skew between differential pairs and Connectors
Predict Fiber weave effect in simulation
Simulate Resin content effect
Low loss material Vs. Crosstalk Vs. reflection
38
39