06.09.15 Final PC Packet

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov
LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL
COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)
Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)
Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)
Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)
Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)
City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell
Todd L. Moody, Chair

Trinity Haven Schlottman, Vice Chair
Byron Goynes
Richard Truesdell
Vicki Quinn
Gus W. Flangas
Glen Trowbridge
Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in the
Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. If you need an accommodation
to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at (702) 229-6301 and advise of
your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.
June 9, 2015
6:00 PM
ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO OR
MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BE
REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDA
MAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL JACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3 RD
FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITYS WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.
NOTICE:
This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:
City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive
ACTIONS:
ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASES
THERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN
AGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPON
FILING OF THE APPLICATION.
ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
AGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY
IMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BE
HEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.
Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 1
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1.
Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and
suggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.
2.
The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is
complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staffs conditions of
approval.
3.
If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staffs condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.
4.
Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If
more than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and
indicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.
5.
Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard,
but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups
of interested parties.
6.
After all objectors input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.
7.
Following the applicants response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst
themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.
8.
Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,
models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in
for the record unless requested by the Commission.
As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciate
your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
3.
ROLL CALL
4.
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THE
AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR
THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE
SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
5.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OF MAY 12, 2015.
6.
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken or
held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.
CONSENT ITEMS:
CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONE
MOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.
7.
ABEYANCE - TMP-58507 - TENTATIVE MAP - BRISTLE HEIGHTS - APPLICANT: MOSAIC LAND, LLC OWNER: S I C NEVADA ONE, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 58-LOT
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 10.42 acres at the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately
285 feet east of Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-002 and 003), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-58401]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
8.
EOT-59115 - EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER:

JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for an Extension of Time of
an approved a Variance (VAR-48827) TO ALLOW A 14-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 50 FEET IS
REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007),
M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
9.
EOT-59116 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CONCRETE

SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request
for an Extension of Time of an approved a Variance (VAR-48828) TO ALLOW NO WALL ON THE NORTH
PROPERTY LINE WHERE A SIX-FOOT SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY, TO ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE WITHIN SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREAS, AND
TO ALLOW AN EXISTING SEVEN-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH MESH SCREENING WHERE A SOLID
STRUCTURE OR WALL OF EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007),
10.
EOT-59059 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 AND EOT-59116 - SITE DEVELOPMENT

PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO
ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for an Extension of Time of an approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-48826) FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 2,784 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE TO A CONTRACTOR'S PLANT, SHOP AND STORAGE YARD OFFICE WITH WAIVERS OF
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER STANDARDS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
AND TWO FEET ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED; AND TO ALLOW
ZERO FEET ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street
(APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDERED
ROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALL
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVE
THAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.
11.
ABEYANCE - ZON-58533 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES,

LLC - OWNER: MARK EVERETT THROWER - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E
(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.03 acres at the northwest corner of Deer
Springs Way and Thom Boulevard (APN 125-24-602-017), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58384]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
12.
VAR-59054 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HEE SAM AND JOHN DUDEK - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE
10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS I) [CASITA] at 8485 Lake Tahoe
View Court (APN 125-05-610-009), R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)
13.
SUP-59052 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59054 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

HEE SAM AND JOHN DUDEK - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 918
SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS I) [CASITA] USE at 8485 Lake Tahoe View Court (APN 12505-610-009), R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58956]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
14.
WVR-59161 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS - OWNER: DOCGORM,

LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPING BUFFER ALONG A
PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE WHERE SIX FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.91 acres
at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58359]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
15.
SUP-58661 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO WVR-59161 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

VERIZON WIRELESS - OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit TO
INSTALL A NEW 86-FOOT TALL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY, STEALTH DESIGN (MONOPALM)
at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58359]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
16.
SUP-58904 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRYZ GUYZ, INC. - OWNER:
DECATUR 215, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A PROPOSED 3,039 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT WITH 503 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 6211 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite
#120 (APN 125-25-614-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58639]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
17.
SUP-59041 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GRIND MODE 1, LLC For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A TRUCK RENTAL USE at 2901 North Rancho Drive
(APN 138-13-601-019), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58919]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
18.
VAC-58900 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: KAREN LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For a

possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 20-foot wide public drainage easement generally located at the
northwest corner of Coke Street and Maggie Avenue, Ward 6 (Ross). Staff recommends APPROVAL.
19.
VAC-59025 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 20-foot wide public alley right-of-way
located between Silver Dollar Avenue and Pennwood Avenue, east of Valley View Boulevard and west of Wing Street,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58958]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

20.
ABEYANCE - GPA-58199 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

DFA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: MXU (MIXED USE) AND C
(COMMERCIAL) TO: LI/R (LIGHT INDUSTRY /RESEARCH) on 28.55 acres at the northeast corner of Bonanza Road
and Clarkway Drive (APNs 139-28-302-001, 002, 003, 012, 014, 031, 032 and 034; and 139-28-303-001 and 003), Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-58196]. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
21.
ABEYANCE - ZON-58200 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-58199 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: DFA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE
ESTATES) AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO: M (INDUSTRIAL) on 28.55 acres at the northeast corner of
Bonanza Road and Clarkway Drive (APNs 139-28-302-001, 002, 003, 012, 014, 031, 032 and 034; and 139-28-303-001
and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58196]. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
22.
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SUP-57330 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: HOMELESS HELPERS - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN
ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW FOUR PARKING SPACES WHERE 18 SPACES ARE
REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED GENERAL PERSONAL SERVICE USE at 200 Foremaster Lane (APN 139-27-504002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-56939]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
23.
ZON-59062 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH - OWNER: JUAN
ANTONIO SERVIN-SAMPERIO - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE
ESTATES) TO: O (OFFICE) on 0.41 acres at 2500 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-029), Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-58466]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
24.
SDR-59063 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-59062 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH - OWNER: JUAN ANTONIO SERVIN-SAMPERIO - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED PARKING FACILITY WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.41 acres at 2500 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802029), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: O (Office)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58466]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
25.
VAR-59047 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALKS, AMENITY ZONE OR GATE ON A
PRIVATE STREET WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones
Boulevard (APN 125-36-302-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
26.
VAR-59048 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59047 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO AMENITY
ZONE ON JONES BOULEVARD AND TO ALLOW NO OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ON ROSADA WAY WHERE
SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-36-302001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
27.
WVR-59049 - WAIVER RELATED TO VAR-59047 AND VAR-59048 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO
ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS ON JONES BOULEVARD, ROSADA WAY AND A PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET
WHERE STREETLIGHTS ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 166-FOOT INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220
FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-36-302-001),
R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
28.
VAR-59050 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR HECKER, ET AL - For

possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN 11-FOOT CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 15
FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on
0.83 acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-23-502-008), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58468]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
29.
SDR-59051 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-59050 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/ OWNER: VICTOR HECKER, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-53497) FOR A 24-BED CONVALESCENT CARE
FACILITY/NURSING HOME WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT TO 11-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
ALONG THE EAST PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.83 acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn
Road and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-23-502-008), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58468]. Staff
30.
VAR-59053 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER:

PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALK,
CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-008),
M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58589]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
31.
ROC-59056 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59053 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Review of Condition of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50483) TO DELETE CONDITION #14
WHICH STATES, "CONSTRUCT ALL INCOMPLETE HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THIS
SITE, AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING SUBSTANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND UNUSED DRIVEWAY
CUTS ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AND REPLACE WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS MEETING CURRENT CITY
STANDARDS WITHIN TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THIS APPROVAL" AND TO DELETE CONDITION
#17 WHICH STATES, "THIS SITE SHALL CONNECT TO PUBLIC SEWER IN RED COACH AVENUE AND
ABANDON THE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) ACCORDING TO SNHD REGULATIONS
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS SITE" on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam
Street (APN 138-03-602-008), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58589]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
32.
VAR-59057 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME

LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO
SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 13803-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
33.
ROC-59058 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59057 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action
on a request for a Review of Condition of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) TO DELETE
CONDITION #13 WHICH STATES, "CONSTRUCT ALL INCOMPLETE HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ADJACENT TO THIS SITE, AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING SUBSTANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND
UNUSED DRIVEWAY CUTS ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AND REPLACE WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS
MEETING CURRENT CITY STANDARDS WITHIN TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THIS APPROVAL" AND
TO DELETE CONDITION #16 WHICH STATES, "THIS SITE SHALL CONNECT TO PUBLIC SEWER IN RED
COACH AVENUE AND ABANDON THE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) ACCORDING TO
SNHD REGULATIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS SITE" on
0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
34.
VAR-58494 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: Y & B INVESTMENTS, LLC - For

possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE FIVE
ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.54 acres at 2521 South Fort Apache Road (APN 163-07-501-012), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-58394]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
35.
WVR-59211 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON - For possible action
on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the
northeast corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Way (APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward
6 (Ross) [PRJ-58883]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
36.
VAR-59031 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59211 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG

JOHNSON - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
INCLUDING AMENITY ZONE AND SIDEWALK WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the northeast
corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Way (APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-58883]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
37.
VAR-59029 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59211 AND VAR-59031 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 20-FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 50 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the northeast corner of Tropical Parkway
and Monte Cristo Way (APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58883]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
38.
SUP-58913 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PPS2, LLC - OWNER: BOCA
PARK MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE WITHIN A PROPOSED 3,479 SQUARE-FOOT
GENERAL PERSONAL SERVICE USE (INSTRUCTIONAL ARTS STUDIO) at 1000 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#10 (APN 138-32-412-018), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-58881]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
39.
SUP-59007 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LEE'S LIQUOR - OWNER:
INLAND WESTERN LAS VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED 7,084 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR SALES (PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT)
USE at 6990 North Durango Drive (APN 125-20-710-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [MT-TC (Montecito Town Center
Mixed-Use Commercial Special Land Use Designation)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58937]. NOTE: THE CORRECT
ADDRESS IS 6690 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
40.
SUP-59012 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS OWNER: PLAZA LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED 1,363 SQUARE-FOOT BAILBOND SERVICE at 546 Eastern Avenue, Suite #130 (APN 139-36110-040), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
41.
SUP-59027 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: B.E. UNO,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,711 SQUARE-FOOT
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 112-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 568 North Eastern
Avenue, Suite A (APN 139-36-111-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58965]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
42.
SUP-59032 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER:

CHARLESTON PLAZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,192
SQUARE-FOOT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A
975-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at
1814 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02-510-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58964].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
43.
SUP-59044 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: T-LVCR, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 13,810 SQUARE-FOOT PACKAGE LIQUOR
OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 18 Fremont Street (APN 139-34-111-033), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone,
Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59011]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
44.
SUP-59055 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RINCON DE LOS REMEDIOS OWNER: WETHERBEE PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED NIGHT CLUB USE WITHIN AN EXISTING 4,680 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT
(TAVERN) at 923 North Pecos Road (APN 139-25-601-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ58640]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
45.
VAC-59208 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR

EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate two five-foot wide public drainage
easements located at 1961-1973 Simmons Street, (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff
46.
SDR-58932 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59208 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR TWO PROPOSED FOUR-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF SIX FEET
WHERE A MINIMUM OF 67.5 FEET IS REQUIRED AND WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOT WIDE
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE SIX
FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 9-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY
WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.48 acres at 1961-1973 Simmons Street (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), R-3
(Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
47.
TXT-58648 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.16.180 related to Home Occupation Permits and
to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
48.
discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.12 related to Permitted Uses to streamline zoning
requirements and development standards for various land uses, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
49.
discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Title 19 to revise the applicability and procedures related to
review of Site Development Plans, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
50.
DIR-59318 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS For discussion and possible action on a request for the appointment of new members to the Downtown Design Review
Committee. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:
51.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE
LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY
BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS
SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 1.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER
Agenda Item No.: 2.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
Agenda Item No.: 3.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL
Agenda Item No.: 4.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO
THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF
DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
Agenda Item No.: 5.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015, 2015

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12, 2015.
Agenda Item No.: 6.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the
applicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and
acted upon at this time.
Agenda Item No.: 7.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - TMP-58507 - TENTATIVE MAP - BRISTLE HEIGHTS - APPLICANT:
MOSAIC LAND, LLC - OWNER: S I C NEVADA ONE, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on
a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 58-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION on 10.42 acres at the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet
east of Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-002 and 003), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot)
Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58401]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 7/15/2015
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within Seven Days)
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE:
APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg.
City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JUNE 9, 2015
DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: MOSAIC LAND, LLC OWNER: S I C NEVADA
ONE, LLC, ET AL
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBER
TMP-58507
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** CONDITIONS **
TMP-58507 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval and conformance to the conditions of approval of Administrative Deviation (DVN58510) shall be required, if approved.
2.
Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map is not
recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within four (4) years of
the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
3.
Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming and Addressing
Regulations.
4.
A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any
combustible structures.
5.
In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R), or
conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a
Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all associated
properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Conditions Page Two
June 9, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with
assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest community or the
respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief description of the required
level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The DPMR must be reviewed and
approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations prior to recordation, and
must include a statement that all properties within the community are subject to assessment for
all associated costs should private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City of Las
Vegas be required to provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement
of obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to
submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations.
6.
All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State Subdivision
Statutes.
Public Works
7.
Dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way adjacent to this site for Deer Springs Way concurrent with
the recordation of a Final Map for this site. Additionally, submit all required documentation
and support materials to the Right-of-Way Section of the Department of Operations and
Maintenance for a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Grant application to obtain a grant
(Sewer, Drainage, and Roadway) for the south side of Inyo Avenue adjacent to this site on
Assessor's Parcel # 125-19-301-012 prior to constructing improvements on the BLM parcel.
Civil Plans may be approved without the grant being authorized; however no construction on
Assessors Parcel 125-19-301-012 may occur until the grant is authorized by BLM and
recorded by the Right-of-Way Section. The developer must submit the BLM application to the
City for review prior to submitting to BLM for authorization. If the BLM Grant application is
submitted, but no activity has occurred toward obtaining the grant within one year of the
submittal of the BLM application, the City will make best efforts to contact the applicant and
request a project status report; however if a project status cannot be determined, the City may
withdraw the grant application. If the City withdraws the application, a brand new grant
application will be required when it is determined that efforts are being made toward obtaining
the grant.
8.
Construct half-street improvements including appropriate overpaving and pavement

transitions on Deer Springs Way adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this site.
Additionally, construct full width street improvements on Inyo Avenue including the full
cul-de-sac bulb. Obtain approval from Clark County for improvements on the south half of
Inyo Avenue. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored
at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
9.
The applicant must accept responsibility for all stipulations required by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) in the offer of the grant made to the City. The off-site improvement
agreement must include a section addressing the acceptance of the BLM grant stipulations
prior to the Citys acceptance of the BLM grant.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Conditions Page Three
10.
Public sewer mains shall be design so that they are typically 5 feet off the street centerlines.
Final design of the sewer infrastructure must meet the approval of the Sanitary Sewer Section
of the Department of Public Works.
11.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.
12.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Deer
Springs Way public right-of-way and and any other public streets prior to this issuance of
permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the
City's Encroachment Agreement.
The installation and maintenance of all private
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property
owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the
Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with
the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
13.
Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to
discuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of construction drawings for this
site.
14.
A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or
submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all
drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site
shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as
are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved
Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
15.
The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is in
concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or alignment
of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage improvements, shall
be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. No additional deviations
from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approval for such is
received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of
subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative
Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page One
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The requested Tentative Map for Bristle Heights consists of a proposed 58-lot single-family
residential subdivision on 10.42 acres located adjacent to the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. On 04/14/15, the Planning Commission approved
a Rezoning (ZON-58154) from PD (Planned Development) to R-CL (Single Family CompactLot) to conform to the previously approved ML (Medium Low Density Residential) land use
designation. The proposed 58-lot single-family residential subdivision adheres to the minimum
requirements for the R-CL zoning designation. There is a vehicular connection to the
neighboring subdivision to the east. Additionally, the subdivision includes 47-foot wide public
streets with five-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street and a three-foot private amenity zone
on each lot frontage for tree plantings. As the proposed map conforms to Nevada Revised
Statutes and Title 19 requirements, staff recommends approval, with conditions.
ISSUES
x
Staff is administratively reviewing an associated Administrative Deviation (DVN-58510)

to allow a connectivity ratio of 1.28 where 1.30 is the minimum required.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-12215) 207.83 acres
generally located north of Centennial Parkway between Shaumber Road and
02/07/07
Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The annexation became effective 02/16/07.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-20465) from R
(Rural Density Residential) to PCD (Planned Community Development) on
06/06/07
23.30 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of Hualapai Way. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-25758) from U (Undeveloped)
[PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan designation] to PD
(Planned Development) on 23.62 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of
04/16/08
Hualapai Way, which included the Providence Square Master Development
Plan and Design Standards. The Planning Commission recommended
approval; staff recommended denial.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Two

The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-25759) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located east of Hualapai Way, south
of Deer Springs Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The approval expired 04/16/11.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-25760)
for a proposed 205,000 square-foot commercial development on 23.62 acres
at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The
Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The approval expired 04/16/12.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-28087) U.S.
Government Patent Easements east of Hualapai Way, south of Deer Springs
08/06/08
Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
approval expired 08/07/11.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-49489) from
PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) on 7.97 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
09/18/13
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-49494) from PD (Planned
Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 7.97 acres on the
south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai
Way. The Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended
denial.
The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-50851) U.S.
Government Patent Easements east of Hualapai Way, south of Deer Springs
Way. An Order of Relinquishment of Interest was recorded 05/28/14.
12/10/13
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-50852) for a 60lot single-family residential subdivision on 7.97 acres on the south side of
Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai Way. Staff
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-52810) to allow a wall
height of 15 feet for a 50-foot section of perimeter wall adjacent to the 215
04/08/14
beltway where 12 feet is the maximum height allowed on a portion of 7.97
acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet east of
Hualapai Way. Staff recommended approval.
A Final Map (FMP-53264) for an 18-lot single-family residential subdivision
05/08/14
on 2.28 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet
east of Hualapai Way, was recorded.
A Final Map (FMP-53457) for a 42-lot single-family residential subdivision
10/21/14
on 5.73 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 1,175
feet east of Hualapai Way, was recorded.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Three

The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-57033) from
PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
03/18/15
Residential) on 10.42 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. Planning Commission and staff
The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear a Rezoning request from PD
(Planned Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 10.42 acres
04/14/15
on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of
Hualapai Way. Staff recommended approval.
Staff is administratively reviewing an Administrative Deviation (DVN58510) to allow a reduction in the required connectivity ratio from 1.30 to
04/13/15
1.28 on 10.42 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately
285 feet east of Hualapai Way.
The Planning Commission held the requested Tentative Map (TMP-58507) in
05/12/15
abeyance at the applicants request. The Tentative Map (TMP-58507) is
scheduled to be heard at the 06/09/15 Planning Commission meeting.
Most Recent Change of Ownership

11/19/10
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 125-19-301-002.
11/06/12
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 125-19-301-003.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

There are no related business licenses or building permits for development on the subject site.
Pre-Application Meeting
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the options available to develop a
58-lot single-family residential development at this location. The submittal
03/18/15
requirements for a Tentative Map were discussed. Also, it was determined
that either a Variance or Administrative Deviation would be required for the
connectivity ratio of 1.28 where 1.30 is required.
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
04/02/15
The site is undeveloped and contains rocky soil and desert vegetation.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Four
Details of Application Request

Site Area
Gross Acres
10.42
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
Undeveloped
East
Single-Family
Residential
West
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
ML (Medium Low
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
Existing Zoning District

R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
PD (Planned
Development)
Master Plan Areas

No Applicable Master Plan Area
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts
Other Plans or Special Requirements
Trails
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
3,000 SF
Min. Lot Width
35 Feet
Min. Distance Between Intersections
125 Feet
Provided
5,000 SF
50 Feet
125 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Five
Standard
Min. Setbacks
x Front (to dwelling)
x Front (to garage face)
x Side
x Corner
x Rear
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
14 Feet
18 Feet
10 Feet (Combined)
10 Feet
10 Feet
14 Feet
18 Feet
10 Feet (Combined)
10 Feet
10 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.04, the following streetscape standards apply:

Streetscape Standards
Required
Provided
5 sidewalk
5 sidewalk
Major Collector
3 amenity zone
3 amenity zone
(Deer Springs Way)
24 box shade trees at
24 and 36 box at 40
40 intervals
intervals
5 sidewalk
5 sidewalk
47-Foot Wide Residential
Streets
3 amenity zone
3 amenity zone
(Streets A, B, C, D
24 box shade trees at
24 box trees at 25
and Inyo Avenue)
25 intervals
intervals
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Deer Springs Way
Major Collector
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Master Plan of Streets

and Highways
30
19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element
# Links
# Nodes
Internal Street
9
Intersection Internal
7
Cul-de-sac Terminus
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted
Total
9
7
Required
Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes):
1.30
1.2857*
*Staff is reviewing an Administrative Deviation (DVN-58510) to allow a connectivity ratio of
1.28 where 1.30 is the minimum required.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Six
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Single Family,
2 Spaces
58
116
Detached
per Unit
116
116
Y
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED
116
N/A
116
N/A
Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required
ANALYSIS
The subject site is a 10.42-acre undeveloped lot located at the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. In March of 2015, the City Council approved a
General Plan Amendment (GPA-57033) to remove the subject site from the approved Providence
Square Master Plan and change the land use designation to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential). On 04/14/15, the Planning Commission approved a Rezoning (ZON-58154) from
PD (Planned Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) to conform to the previously
approved ML (Medium Low Density Residential) land use designation and continue to prepare
the site for future single-family residential development.
The applicant is currently requesting a Tentative Map for a 58-lot single-family subdivision to
cover the 10.42-acre site. The previously approved General Plan Amendment (GPA-57033)
changed the land use designation from PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML
(Medium Low Density Residential) and allows the site to accommodate up to 8.49 dwelling units
per acre. As proposed, the subject site would have a density of 5.8 dwelling units per acre, which
complies with the maximum density limitations.
The proposed lots take access from Deer Springs Way. As an 80-foot wide Major Collector, Title
19.04 requires Deer Springs Way to be constructed to Complete Streets Standards. These
standards include provisions of five-foot sidewalks and three-foot amenity zones within the
right-of-way, with shade trees to be spaced a maximum of 40 feet on center within the planter
area. The submitted landscape plan, date stamped 03/26/15, illustrates compliance with the
minimum requirements of Title 19.04.190 with a three-foot wide amenity zone and 36-inch box
Rio Grande Ash or 24-inch box Holly Oak every 40 feet on center. In addition, perimeter
landscaping is required outside of the right-of-way along Deer Springs Way, consisting of a sixfoot buffer area with deciduous, evergreen or palm trees spaced a maximum of 40 feet on center.
The submitted landscape plan illustrates compliance with a six-foot wide buffer area and 24-inch
box Texas Mountain Laurel or Holly Oak trees every 40 feet on center.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Seven
Direct access to the residential lots will be provided via 47-foot wide public streets with five-foot
wide sidewalks located on either side of the street. As proposed, the 47-foot wide public streets
are to be constructed to Complete Street Standards. The submitted tentative map and landscape
plan illustrate three-foot wide amenity zones with shade trees spaced 25 feet on center, which
adhere to the minimum requirements outlined by Title 19.04.210. Adjacent to the east of the
subject site is a single-family residential subdivision, in which the applicant is proposing a
connection. According to the submitted tentative map, Inyo Avenue, which is a 47-foot wide
public street, provides interconnectivity between the two single-family residential subdivisions.
The lot sizes of the development range from 5,000 square feet up to 9,149 square feet.
According to the submitted Tentative Map, the proposed home models adhere to the minimum
setback requirements for the R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning designation as outlined
by Title 19.06. The floor plans of the individual model types were not submitted as a part of this
review. A detailed review of the floor plans will occur during the plan check and permitting
process.
The connectivity ratio of 1.28 is below the standard of 1.30, as outlined by Title 19.04.040.
Connectivity is a measure of how efficiently a transportation network provides access between
internal and external destinations. A well-connected street system has minimal dead-ends (culde-sacs). As connectivity increases, travel distances decrease and route options increase,
allowing more direct travel between destinations. A higher connectivity ratio creates a
transportation system that is more accessible, especially for pedestrians and bicyclists. A
Variance is normally required to deviate from the 1.30 minimum requirement; however, Title
19.04.040(B)(2)(a) allows the connectivity ratio to be reduced through the submittal of an
Administrative Deviation application, with the advisement of the Director of Public Works. The
Department of Public Works supports the Administrative Deviation, as the subject site is
extremely limited on connectivity options. Located to the south of the subject site is the 215
Beltway with a substantial grade differential creating a gap between any potential connections to
the Beltway Trail. Adjacent to the east is a single-family residential subdivision, in which the
applicant is proposing a connection.
The submitted north/south and east/west cross sections depict a grade ranging from 3% to 4.7%
across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050, a development with slope more
than 2% is allowed a maximum six-foot retaining wall. The combination of perimeter walls and
retaining walls cannot exceed 12 feet. The submitted cross section, date stamped 03/24/15,
depicts a maximum retaining wall height of four feet, six inches, which is in compliance with
Title 19.06.
FINDINGS (TMP-58507)
As the designed tentative map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes for subdivision of land and
Title 19.06 requirements for R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) development, staff recommends
approval, with conditions.
GK
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401]
Staff Report Page Eight
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED
NOTICES MAILED
N/A
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
36
GK
703
703
703

703

703
703
703
bA77
A7
7A
bA7
A7b
A77
7A
TMP-58507
b7A
A777
77Ab
A77
A7A7
A7A7
7Ab7
A77
A
AbA
b7
A7A
TMP-58507
A7A
7
A7A
TMP-58507
A7A
7
AA7A
A777b7b
TMP-58507
7 7777b7b
A7
7b7b
A7A
7 77A777b
7 b777A7bb7
TMP-58507
7 7b777
7 7b777A77
7 77777b
A7A
7 77A777b
7 b777A7bb7
TMP-58507
7 7b777
7 7b777A77
7 77777b
A7A
TMP-58507 [PRJ-58401] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: MOSAIC LAND, LLC - OWNER: S I C

NEVADA ONE, LLC, ET AL
SOUTH SIDE OF DEER SPRINGS WAY, APPROXIMATELY 285 FEET EAST OF HUALAPAI WAY
04/02/15
TMP-58507
TMP-58507
Agenda Item No.: 8.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
EOT-59115 - EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CONCRETE
SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible
action on a request for an Extension of Time of an approved a Variance (VAR-48827) TO
ALLOW A 14-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 50 FEET IS REQUIRED ADJACENT
TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007),
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - EOT-59115, EOT-59116 and EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - EOT-59115, EOT-59116 and EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]
3. Supporting Documentation - EOT-59115, EOT-59116 and EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]
4. Photo(s) - EOT-59115, EOT-59116 and EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]
5. Justification Letter - EOT-59115, EOT-59116 and EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]
3. Action Letter for VAR-48827
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME
LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ
CASE
NUMBER
EOT-59115
EOT-59116
EOT-59059
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
EOT-59115 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
This Variance (VAR-48827) shall expire on June 11, 2016 unless another Extension of Time
is approved by the City Council.
2.
Conformance to the conditions of approval of the Variance (VAR-48827) and all other site
related actions as required by the Department of Planning and Department of Public Works.
Planning
1.
This Variance (VAR-48828) shall expire on June 11, 2016 unless another Extension of Time
is approved by the City Council.
2.
Conformance to the conditions of approval of the Variance (VAR-48828) and all other site
related actions as required by the Department of Planning and Department of Public Works.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
This Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) shall expire on June 11, 2016 unless
another Extension of Time is approved by the City Council.
2.
All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days of final
approval.
3.
Conformance to the conditions of approval of the Site Development Plan Review (SDR48826) and all other site related actions as required by the Department of Planning and
Department of Public Works.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject site is currently a Contractors Plant, Shop and Storage Yard with a previously
approved Variance (VAR-48827), Variance (VAR-48828) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-48826) for the conversion of an existing 2,784 square-foot single family residence to a
Contractor's Plant, Shop and Storage Yard office with Waivers of perimeter landscape buffer
standards to allow zero feet on the north property line and two feet on the south property line
where eight feet is required; and to allow zero feet on the east property line where 15 feet is
required. There are two associated Variances first to allow a 14-foot side yard setback, where
50 feet is required adjacent to residential districts and secondly to allow no wall on the north
property line where a six-foot screen wall is required adjacent to residential property, to allow
outdoor storage within setback and landscape buffer areas, and to allow an existing seven-foot
chain link fence with mesh screening where a solid structure or wall of eight feet is required on
0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street. Plans have been processed, but no building permits have been
issued for the conversion. Though there have been changes in development in the surrounding
area, with the approval of a Private School, Primary to the east; staff is recommending approval
with a one-year time limit.
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The City Council approved an Annexation (ANX-23639) for a petition to
Annex property at 4515 Balsam Street, containing approximately 0.61 acres.
The Planning Commission and the Department of Planning staff
12/19/07
recommended approval of the request. The effective date of the Annexation
was 12/28/07.
A Code Enforcement case (#62799) was processed for a business being run
out of an existing residence at 4515 Balsam Street. The case was resolved on
02/27/08
09/04/08.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-28388) from O
(Office) to LI/R (Light Industry/Research) on this site as part of a larger
request. The Planning Commission recommended approval and the
Department of Planning staff recommended denial.
08/20/08
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-28389) from R-E (Residence
Estates) to M (Industrial) on this site as part of a larger request. The Planning
Commission recommended approval and the Department of Planning staff
recommended denial.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]


As part of a larger request, the City Council approved a Variance (VAR28392) to allow a 10-foot side yard setback where 50 feet is required adjacent
to a residentially zoned district at 4505 and 4515 Balsam Street and 4491
North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and the Department of Planning staff recommended denial. The
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-28393) a 60-foot wide
portion of Balsam Street located approximately 300 feet south of Red Coach
08/20/08
Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval and the
Department of Planning staff recommended denial. The approval expired
08/20/10.
for a proposed 51,250 square-foot warehouse center with 18,100 square feet
of office that included this site, with waivers of perimeter landscaping. The
Planning Commission recommended approval and the Department of
Planning staff recommended denial. The approval expired 08/20/10.
09/08/08
out of an existing residence and vehicles being parked on a dirt lot at 4515
Balsam Street. The case was resolved on 09/10/08.
02/17/09
The Department of Planning staff administratively approved a Temporary
03/30/09
Commercial Permit (TCP-33864) for an auction located at 4515 Balsam
Avenue. The permit was valid from 03/30/09 to 04/28/09.
04/24/09
Sign Permit (TSP-34287) for a temporary sign at 4515 Balsam Avenue. The
permit was valid from 04/24/09 to 05/24/09.
An application for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-34011) for the
conversion of two residences at 4505 and 4515 Balsam Street and a Variance
06/11/09
(VAR-34013) to allow no screen wall adjacent to a residential use was
withdrawn by the Planning Commission at the applicant's request.
A Code Enforcement case (#97730) was processed for parking asphalt trucks
on the neighbors property at 4515 Balsam Avenue. The case was resolved
02/01/11
on 02/02/11.
A code enforcement case (105714) was processed for running a business from
09/13/11
residential property and parking semi-trucks at 4515 Balsam Street. The case
was resolved on 03/05/12.
A code enforcement case (121399) was processed for an unpaved parking lot
10/24/12
at 4515 Balsam Street. The case is unresolved.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]


The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-48827) to allow a 14foot side yard setback, where 50 feet is required adjacent to residential
06/11/13
districts on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street. The Department of Planning
staff recommended denial.

The Planning Commission approved a related Variance (VAR-48828) to
allow no wall on the north property line where a six-foot screen wall is
required adjacent to residential property, to allow outdoor storage within
setback and landscape buffer areas, and to allow an existing seven-foot chain
link fence with mesh screening where a solid structure or wall of eight feet is
required on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street. The Department of Planning
06/11/13
The Planning Commission approved a related Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-48826) for the conversion of an existing 2,784 square-foot single
family residence to a Contractor's Plant, Shop and Storage Yard office with
Waivers of perimeter landscape buffer standards to allow zero feet on the
north property line and two feet on the south property line where eight feet is
required; and to allow zero feet on the east property line where 15 feet is

06/28/12
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

c.1972
The building at 4515 Balsam Street was constructed.
A business license (C25-03647) was issued for a Contractor at 4515 Balsam
10/22/07
Street. The license remains active at this location.
A Building Permit (#136693) was initiated for a tenant improvement at 4515
03/31/09
Balsam Street. No reviews were ever generated.
11/05/13
A business license (G62-02313) was issued for Automotive Sales with Minor
02/28/14
Repair at 4515 Balsam Street. The license was marked out of business on
03/10/14.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]


03/24/14
03/18/15.
A building permit (257981) was issued for a for block wall at 4515 Balsam
04/09/14
Street. The permit was finalized on 01/05/15.
A building permit (262142) was processed for a Tenant Improvement to
convert a single family residence to an office at 4515 Balsam Street. No
06/09/14
permits have been issued, as civil improvement plan (53427) has not been
approved.
A pre-application meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
04/28/15
Staff conducted a field check of the subject site and found a Contractors
Plant, Shop and Storage Yard with no completed half-street improvements,
multiple vehicles and trailers in front of the building and an unpermitted sign
for auto sales.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.61
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
Single Family
Residential
OP (Office Professional
Clark County)
R-E (Rural Estates

Residential Clark
County)
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]

Surrounding
Property
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
Private School,
Primary
U.S.-95 (Right-ofWay)
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
C-PB (Planned Business

Park)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175 Feet)
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ANALYSIS
This is the first request for an Extension of Time of two previously approved Variances (VAR48827 and VAR-48828) and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) for the conversion
of an existing 2,784 square-foot single family residence to a Contractor's Plant, Shop and Storage
Yard office with Waivers of perimeter landscape buffer standards to allow zero feet on the north
property line and two feet on the south property line where eight feet is required; and to allow
zero feet on the east property line where 15 feet is required. The associated Variances are to
allow a 14-foot side yard setback, where 50 feet is required adjacent to residential districts and
secondly to allow no wall on the north property line where a six-foot screen wall is required
adjacent to residential property, to allow outdoor storage within setback and landscape buffer
areas, and to allow an existing seven-foot chain link fence with mesh screening where a solid
structure or wall of eight feet is required on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street. Plans have been
processed, but no permits have been issued for the proposed conversion.
Title 19.16.100 and Title 19.16.140 deems a Site Development Plan Review and Variance
exercised upon the issuance of a building permit for the principal structure on site.
JG
EOT-59115, EOT-59116 & EOT-59059 [PRJ-58590]

FINDINGS
The Site Development Plan Review and Variance have not been exercised in accordance with the
requirements of Title 19.16.100 and Title 19.16.140 as a building permit has not been issued for
the proposed conversion. The applicant is requesting an Extension of Time, as the approved
entitlements would expire prior to the issuance of building permits and has requested a new
Variance and Review of Condition to remove specific conditions they deem cost prohibitive to
complete the project. As this is the first request for an Extension of Time and the applicant is
making progress on the development, staff recommends approval of Extensions of Time for the
Variances (VAR-48827 and VAR-48828) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) with
conditions.
NOTICES MAILED
N/A
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
26
JG
EOT-59115
EOT-59115
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
7
AbA
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
7 A A 7 7
' ' b
7' b
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
b 7A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A b
7 7
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7 7 A 7
bA
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 b A
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7b
7 ' 7 A 7
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A b 7 b A
b7A
A A 7
b A 7

A 7
A
A
7
A 7
7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
7 A
A
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A bA7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7A A
A A 7 A b
A b A 7A A
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
7 ' 7 A 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A7
AA
b 7b
' ' b
A 7
b A
b A 7 7 7
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
b'b
b A
7 b 7
b A
' ' b
' ' b
'
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
Ab
7 A
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
A A b 7 7
7 ' 7 A 7 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
b 7 A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
7 A A 7 7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
b A 7
7 7b b 7
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A 7b A
7 A
7 b A
A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7
b A
b A
AA
b 7b
' ' b
b'b
b A
' ' b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
' ' b
'
7A 7 A
Ab
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
7
AbA
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
7 A A 7 7
' ' b
7' b
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
b 7A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A b
7 7
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7 7 A 7
bA
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 b A
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7b
7 ' 7 A 7
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A b 7 b A
b7A
A A 7
b A 7

A 7
A
A
7
A 7
7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
7 A
A
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
AbA
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7' b
7 b A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
b 7A
7 A b A 7 b
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 A b A
7A b
7 7
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7A 7 A
7 A
A
7A 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A bA7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7A A
A A 7 A b
A b A 7A A
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
7 ' 7 A 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A7
AA
b 7b
' ' b
A 7
b A 7 7 7
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
b'b
b A
7 b 7
b A
' ' b
' ' b
'
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
Ab
7 A
b A
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b

A 7
A
A
7
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
A A b 7 7
7 ' 7 A 7 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A b 7 b A
A 7 AA
b A 7
b7A
7b A b 7A
A A 7
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
b 7 A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
7 A A 7 7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
b A 7
7 7b b 7
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A 7b A
7 A
7 b A
A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7
b A
b A
AA
b 7b
' ' b
b'b
b A
' ' b
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
' ' b
'
7A 7 A
Ab
EOT-59115 [PRJ-58590] - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59116 AND EOT-59059 APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ
4515 BALSAM STREET
04/28/15
4515 BALSAM STREET
04/28/15
4515 BALSAM STREET
04/28/15
EOT-59059, EOT-59115 and EOT-59116
EOT-59115
EOT-59115
Agenda Item No.: 9.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
EOT-59116 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 - VARIANCE APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO
ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for an Extension of Time of an approved a
Variance (VAR-48828) TO ALLOW NO WALL ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
WHERE A SIX-FOOT SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY, TO ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE WITHIN SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE
BUFFER AREAS, AND TO ALLOW AN EXISTING SEVEN-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE
WITH MESH SCREENING WHERE A SOLID STRUCTURE OR WALL OF EIGHT FEET IS
REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone,
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
3. Action Letter for VAR-48828
Consistent with the Citys

sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
EOT-59116
EOT-59116
EOT-59116
EOT-59116
Agenda Item No.: 10.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
EOT-59059 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 AND EOT-59116 - SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER:
JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for an
Extension of Time of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) FOR THE
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 2,784 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TO A CONTRACTOR''S PLANT, SHOP AND STORAGE YARD OFFICE WITH WAIVERS
OF PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER STANDARDS TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ON THE
NORTH PROPERTY LINE AND TWO FEET ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED; AND TO ALLOW ZERO FEET ON THE EAST PROPERTY
LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Action Letter for SDR-48826

paper use, backup
EOT-59059
EOT-59059
EOT-59059
EOT-59059
EOT-59059

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - ZON-58533 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRECEDENT
PROPERTIES, LLC - OWNER: MARK EVERETT THROWER - For possible action on a
request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) on 2.03 acres at the northwest corner of Deer Springs Way and Thom
Boulevard (APN 125-24-602-017), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58384].
Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 7/15/2015
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
2. Staff Report
4. Photo(s)
6. Condition Confirmation Letter and Protest/Support Postcards
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - OWNER:
MARK EVERETT THROWER
CASE
NUMBER
ZON-58533
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
YK
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Rezoning application to change the zoning district from R-E
(Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) on 2.03 acres of land located on the
northwest corner of Deer Springs Way and Thom Boulevard. Staff recommends approval of the
request as the density of the proposal is compatible with the existing residential developments
surrounding the site. If denied, the parcel would remain unchanged and only residential
development that meets the current R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district standards could be
development on the site.
The City Council approved at Annexation (A-0003-64) request of
approximately 10,365 acres generally located north of Lone Mountain Road
05/14/64
and west of Decatur Boulevard with the effective date of 05/18/64. This site
was part of that request.

08/17/90

No related permits on file at this time.
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the request to rezone property
located on the northwest corner of Thom Boulevard and Deer Springs Way.
03/17/15
The General Plan land use designation is ML (Medium Low Density
Residential), which allows the requested R-1 (Single Family Residential)
designation.
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
YK
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384]
Field Check
04/02/15
Staff visited the site and found an undeveloped parcel with a large for sale
sign. There were also two No Trespassing and No Dumping signs.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.03
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
Single-Family,
Detached
Single-Family,
Detached
Single-Family,
Detached
Single-Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low

R-E (Residence Estates)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

Rural Preservation Overlay 330-Foot Buffer
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
General Plan
ML (Medium Low Density
Residential)
Existing Zoning
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
8.49 Units per Acre
17 Units
Permitted Density
2.17 Units per Acre
Units Allowed
4 Units
YK
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384]
Proposed Zoning
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Street Name
Deer Springs Way
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
6.7 Units per Acre
13 Units
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Secondary
Collector
Thom Boulevard
Local
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
60
ANALYSIS
The subject request is to change the zoning designation of a 2.03 acre parcel of land located on
the northwest corner of Deer Springs Way and Thom Boulevard from R-E (Residence Estates) to
R-1 (Single Family Residential). This request is allowed under the ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) land use designation. Similar action was allowed directly to the east and south of
this proposal.
This proposal supports Objective 2.6 of the General Plan: To improve the amount and quality
of infill development on vacant and underutilized lands within established areas of the city.
The area adjacent to the site is all developed as single-family, detached properties and this
proposal would allow a similar development pattern. The parcel is also located within the 330foot buffer area of the Rural Preservation Overlay. This allows City Council, for good cause
shown, to approve a greater density or intensity of use than that which exists within the Overlay
District. In this case, the applicant is requesting a 33% greater density than what is found in the
nearby Rural Preservation Overlay. The good cause shown is the fact that all properties directly
adjacent to the Rural Preservation Overlay have also been zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential)
has outlined in the applicants justification letter. As a result of this fact, staff supports the
request.
FINDINGS (ZON-58533)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
YK
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384]
1.
The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Rezoning to R-1 (Single Family Residential) conforms to the density range
allowed by the existing ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation
and supports Objective 2.6 of the General Plan. However, the density is 33% greater than
the density in the Rural Preservation Overlay and impacts this proposal since the parcel is
located within the 330-foot buffer area of the Overlay.
2.
The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
The detached single-family residential uses allowed on the subject property will
seamlessly blend with the existing single-family residences found on all four perimeters of
the property.
3.
Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The density and size of the lots proposed for the property to be rezoned will resemble the
development pattern of surrounding properties. The proposed Rezoning is therefore
appropriate.
4.
Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
Access to the property is provided by Deer Springs Way, identified as an 80-foot Collector
Street on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. This road is adequate to meet the
traffic demands of the proposed Rezoning. Access is also available via Thom Boulevard, a
60-foot Local Street.
NOTICES MAILED
216
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
24
YK
=21
=21
3&
77
7A
bA77A
A7A7
A77
A7
A7A
A AA7 7b
b 7
A7 b
7A
b7AA
7b 7b
b
7b
7
77A7
A777A
777
77=
77
7
7777=
b77=
b
bA
77
7A
7
AbAA77b
b7A7b7
A
77 7
77
7
777
777
77A
77
7
777
775
777
75
777
b77b
b
b

777

77

777
b
b
b77b
b
b
b777b
b
b
b777b
b
b
b777b

777
b
b
b777b

777
b

b777
5
5
b
b
b777b
777
ZON-58533
77 77
77 7 7 777b
777 7
7 7777
77
777
b77
77A77
ZON-58533 [PRJ-58384] - REZONING -APPLICANT: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES, LLC - OWNER: MARK

EVERETT THROWER
NORTHWEST CORNER OF DEER SPRINGS WAY AND THOM BOULEVARD
04/02/15
ZON-58533 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59054 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HEE SAM AND
JOHN DUDEK - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT
SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (CLASS I) [CASITA] at 8485 Lake Tahoe View Court (APN 12505-610-009), R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-59054 and SUP-59052 [PRJ-58956]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-59054 and SUP-59052 [PRJ-58956]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-59054 and SUP-59052 [PRJ-58956]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-59054 and SUP-59052 [PRJ-58956]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-59054 and SUP-59052 [PRJ-58956]
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: HEE SAM AND JOHN DUDEK
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-59054
SUP-59052
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
VAR-59054
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-59054 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for
consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
2.
All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and
Safety.
3.
These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted
for building permit.
4.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,
except as modified herein.
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

Conditions Page Two
SUP-59052 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for an Accessory
Structure (Class I) use.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Variance and Special Use Permit to allow a proposed 918 square-foot
guest house/casita to be located five feet from the side and rear property line where ten feet is
minimum required by Title 19.06.060. The subject site is located at 8485 Lake Tahoe View
Court, in an R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2 Units per Acre) zoning district. The
subject property is adjacent to a 40-foot wide public drainage easement to the west and a 15-foot
wide common element lot A, which is utilized as a landscape buffer from the Log Cabin Way
right-of-way to the south. No negative impacts to surrounding development are anticipated with
this proposal. Furthermore, the presence of the drainage easement and common element lot
represents unique evidence to warrant the requested Variance, therefore, Staff recommends
approval with conditions.
ISSUES
x
x
A Variance is required to allow an Accessory Structure (Class I) to be five feet from the side
and rear property line where ten feet is minimum required by Title 19.06.060.
A Special Use Permit is required to allow an Accessory Structure (Class I) that provides
living quarters including full kitchen facilities within the R-PD2 (Residential Planned
Development 2 Units per Acre) zoning district per Title 19.12.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0001-99) from R-E (Residence
Estates) to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2 Units per Acre) on a
04/26/99
portion of this site. The Planning Commission recommended Denial.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0009-99) from R-E (Residence
05/24/99
Estates) to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2 Units per Acre) on a
portion of this site. The Planning Commission recommended Approval.
The City Council approved a Second Extension of Time of approved
Rezoning applications [Z-0001-99(2) and Z-0009-99(2)] on this site. The
06/06/01
Planning Commission recommended Approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-1395) for a proposed 565-lot single-family residential development on
02/19/03
this site. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval on
01/23/03.
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)


The City Council approved a request for a Extension of Time (EOT-2454) on
an approved Rezoning (Z-0001-99) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-PD2
08/06/03
(Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) on 189.2 acres adjacent
to the east and west sides of the Durango Drive alignment, between the
Moccasin Road and Log Cabin Way alignments.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP3055) for Log Cabin Ranch for the overall development parcels on this site.
10/23/03
Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP3530) for a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on 15.9 acres adjacent
04/22/04
to the west side of Durango Drive between Log Cabin Way and Moccasin
Road. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning and Development Department administratively approved a Final
Map Technical Review for Log Cabin Ranch (FMP-4806) for the overall
development parcels on this site. To date, a copy of the recorded map has not
been submitted.
08/04/04
The City Council approved a Petition to annex (ANX-4428) property
generally located on the north side of Log Cabin Way between Durango Drive
and El Capitan Way, containing approximately 5.794 acres.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-6090)
for an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-1395) for a proposed
04/06/05
565-lot single-family residential development on 226.80 acres adjacent to the
east and west sides of Durango Drive, between Log Cabin Way and Moccasin
Road.

08/31/10

A building permit (#60044666) was received for a single-family dwelling at
07/14/06
8485 Lake Tahoe View Court. The permit has not been completed.
A building permit (#208423) was processed for a pool and spa at 8485 Lake
04/05/12
Tahoe View Court. The permit was finalized on 07/05/12.
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)


A Code Enforcement case (#124788) was processed for a motor home on side
yard and tuff shed installed next to property line at 8485 Lake Tahoe View
02/11/13
Court. The case was resolved on 02/13/13.
A building permit (#283229) was processed for a single-family dwelling
detached casita at 8485 Lake Tahoe View Court. The permit has not been
04/07/15
completed.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
requirements for a Special Use Permit and Variance for a proposed Accessory
04/22/15
Structure (Class I) that is located five feet from the side and rear property line
where ten feet is minimum required is minimum required by Title 19.06.
Field Check
04/30/15
A field check was conducted on the subject property and revealed a well
maintained single-family residence.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.62
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Single-Family,
Detached
North
Single-Family,
Detached
South
Single-Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
RA (Residential
Agricultural) Clark
County

R-PD2 (Residential
Planned Development 2
Units per Acre)
R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
R-A (Residential
Agricultural One Unit
per Acre) Clark County
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
East
Single-Family,
Detached
West
Single-Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)

R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
Master Plan Areas

Rural Preservation Overlay District
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
Y
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.06 and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-1395), the following
standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed Provided
Compliance
Min. Setbacks (Accessory Structure)
x Side
10 Feet
5 Feet
N
10 Feet
5 Feet
N
x Rear
Min. Distance from the principle dwelling
6 Feet
21 Feet
Y
Max. Building Height
One Story
One Story
Y*
*Per Site Development Plan Review (SDR-1395) the maximum building height within this
development is two-stories or 35 feet, whichever is less, except for the southernmost and
westernmost properties of phase six shall be limited to single story.
Street Name
Lake Tahoe View
Court
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Local Street

and Highways
40 Feet
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

ANALYSIS
This application is a request for a Variance and Special Use Permit to allow a proposed 918
square-foot Accessory Structure (Class I) to be located five feet from the side and rear property
line where ten feet is minimum required by Title 19.06.060. The subject site is located at 8485
Lake Tahoe View Court, in an R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development 2 Units per Acre)
zoning district. In addition, the subject site is 0.62 acres which equates to approximately 27,007
square feet in area; which is equivalent to the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning development
standards outlined in Title 19.06.060.
An Accessory Structure (Class I) is described in Title 19.12 as: An accessory structure which is
located on the same residential parcel as a principal dwelling and which, as an ancillary use,
provide living quarters, including full kitchen facilities, for the occupants of the principal
dwelling or their tenants, domestic employees or temporary guests.
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:
* 1. The size of the lot or parcel must exceed 6500 square feet.
The subject site is 0.62 acres which equates to approximately 27,007 square feet in area, which
exceeds the 6,500 square-foot minimum parcel size.
2. Unless the principal dwelling is owner-occupied, a Class I accessory structure may not be
offered or occupied as a rental unit.
The applicant has indicated in the submitted justification letter that the structure will be utilized
as living space for an elderly family member and will not be occupied as a rental unit.
According to the submitted justification letter and floor plan, the proposed use meets the
definition outlined above. The submitted elevations and floor plan indicate that the proposed
one-story structure will be 13 feet in height measured to the mid-point of the rooftop eave and be
utilized as a guest house and casita with full kitchen facilities, which require the approval of a
Special Use Permit per Title 19.12. The accessory structure has been designed to aesthetically
match the principle dwelling with exterior stucco a tile roof to match the existing residence.
There is also an existing Accessory Structure (Class II) [Shed] on the subject site which is 192
square feet in size and is placed on a building pad approximately three feet away from the side
yard property line on the western perimeter of the subject site. Since the structure is less than 200
square feet in size the Building and Safety Department does not require the issuance of a
building permit for the structure. Older aerial photographs of the subject site indicate the
structure was erected in 2012, prior to the establishment of Ordinance #6229 on 12/19/12; which
amended the required setback for Accessory Structures from three feet to the side and rear
property line to 10 feet in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. Staff has determined that
existing shed is a legal non-conforming building, which does not need a Variance to meet
setback requirements and is not part of this request.
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

Accessory structures in this residential development must adhere to Title 19.06 Development
Standards, as the Site Development Plan Review (SDR-1395) conditions of approval omit
minimum setback requirements for accessory structures. Title 19.06.060 requires accessory
structures in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district to maintain a minimum distance
separation of ten feet from the side and rear property lines. However, the subject property is
adjacent to a 40-foot wide public drainage easement to the west and a 15-foot wide common
element lot A which is utilizes as a landscape buffer to the south. The presence of the drainage
easement and common element lot represents unique evidence to warrant the requested Variance,
therefore, Staff recommends approval with conditions.
FINDINGS (VAR-59054)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:
1.
2.
3.
Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.
Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of
property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of
the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or
resolution.
Evidence of a unique circumstance has been presented; the subject property is adjacent to a 40foot wide public drainage easement to the west and a 15-foot wide common element lot A
which is utilizes as a landscape buffer to the south and will not negatively impact surrounding
development. Since there are unique circumstances, pursuant to NRS 278.315 of the Variance
there is grounds for the approval; therefore staff request approval of this application.
FINDINGS (SUP-59052)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:
JB
VAR-59054 & SUP-59052 (PRJ-58956)

1.
The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
The proposed Accessory Structure (Class I) use is compatible with the surrounding land
uses and can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.
The subject site is 0.62 acres which equates to approximately 27,007 square feet in area
and is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property from Lake Tahoe View
Court a 40-foot Local Street as classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
4.
Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.
Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health safety and
general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject
to licensing restrictions.
5.
The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.
The proposed use meets all applicable conditions of approval for an Accessory
Structure (Class I) use per Title 19.12.
NOTICES MAILED
90
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
16
JB
VAR-59054
VAR-59054
VAR-59054
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052
VAR-59054 and SUP-59052

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59052 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59054 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: HEE SAM AND JOHN DUDEK - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 918 SQUARE-FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
(CLASS I) [CASITA] USE at 8485 Lake Tahoe View Court (APN 125-05-610-009), R-PD2
(Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58956]. Staff
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-59052
SUP-59052
SUP-59052

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-59161 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW A
ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPING BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN
PROPERTY LINE WHERE SIX FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at 5741
Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-27-410-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service
Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58359]. Staff
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 [PRJ-58359]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 [PRJ-58359]
3. Supporting Documentation - WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 [PRJ-58359]
4. Photo(s) - WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 [PRJ-58359]
5. Justification Letter - WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 [PRJ-58359]
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
WVR-59161
SUP-58661
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
WVR-59161
** CONDITIONS **
WVR-59161 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit and Plot Plan Review
(U-0070-99) shall be required, if approved.
2.
This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
3.
Safety.
4.
A Waiver from Town Center Development standards to allow a zero-foot landscaping

buffer along a portion of the southern property line where six feet is the minimum required
is approved.
5.
6.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under the Town Center Development

Standards Manual for a Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) use.
2.
3.
The communications monopalm and its associated equipment and facility shall be properly
maintained and kept free of graffiti at all times. Failure to perform the required
maintenance may result in fines and/or removal of the communications monopalm and its
associated equipment and facility.
4.
Safety.
5.
for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.
6.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit to establish a proposed 86-foot tall Wireless
Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive. According to the
Town Center Development Standards Manual, a new Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Design (Monopalm) requires a Special Use Permit in the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town
Center) Special Land Use designation. In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver to
allow a zero-foot landscaping buffer along a portion of the southern property line where six feet
is the minimum required as a result of the siting of the tower.
The subject site is located on a 0.74 acre portion of a 4.40 acre commercial subdivision, which is
currently developed as an Animal Hospital. The applicant has proposed to install the proposed
Wireless Communication Facility along the southern perimeter of the subject site adjacent to the
existing elevated entrance to US Highway 95. As this request can be conducted in a compatible
and harmonious manner within the existing commercial development, staff recommends
approval of this application. If denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the Wireless
Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) use at this location.
ISSUES
x
x
The proposed Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) use is not
designed to be made part of another structure and is visually discernable, which requires the
approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver is required to allow a zero-foot landscaping buffer along a portion of the southern
property line where six feet is the minimum required.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a request to Annex (A-0003-64)
Circa 05/64
approximately 5,000 acres of property located north of Lone Mountain Road
and west of Decatur Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for Reclassification of Property (Z0083-89) from N-U (Non-Urban) and C-2 (General Commercial) to R-3
(Limited Multiple Residence), R-PD6 (Residential Planned Development 6
Units per Acre), R-PD18 (Residential Planned Development 18 Units per
09/20/89
Acre) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property located on the southeast
corner of Rancho Drive and Tropical Parkway. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the request on 08/22/89.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)


The City Council approved a request for Reclassification of Property (Z0064-95) from C-2 (General Commercial) and N-U (Non-Urban under
resolution of intent to R-E [Residence Estates]) to C-1 (Limited Commercial)
10/03/95
on property located on the north side of Ann Road, between Tenaya Way and
Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
request on 10/22/98.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time [U-011795(2)] on an approved Special Use Permit (U-0117-95) for a proposed tavern
in conjunction with a proposed restaurant on property located north of Ann
12/15/97
Road, east of Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the request on 11/20/97.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0107-98)
for proposed Package Liquor sales in conjunction with a proposed 15,393
10/26/98
square-foot Drug Store on property located on the north side of Ann Road
between US 95 and Tenaya Way. The Planning Commission recommended
for a proposed 2,000 square-foot Minor Auto Repair Facility on property
11/23/98
located on the north side of Ann Road between US 95 and Tenaya Way. The
Planning Commission recommended denial of the request on 08/27/98.
12/03/98
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Final Map (FM-0099-98)
The City Council approved a request for Reclassification of Property (Z0076-98) from U (Undeveloped), R-E (Residence Estates), R-PD7
(Residential Planned Development 7 Units per Acre), R-PD11 (Residential
Planned Development 11 Units per Acre), R-PD13 (Residential Planned
Development 13 Units per Acre), R-PD18 (Residential Planned
12/07/98
Development 18 Units per Acre), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot), C-1
(Limited Commercial), C-2 (General Commercial), C-V (Civic) and PD
(Planned Development) zones to T-C (Town Center) on 1,468 acres. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the request on 11/05/98.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time [U-011795(3)] on an approved Special Use Permit (U-0117-95) for a proposed tavern
12/07/98
in conjunction with a proposed restaurant on property located north of Ann
Road, east of Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
for a proposed 7,300 square-foot Veterinarian Hospital on property located on
10/06/99
the south side of Sky Pointe Drive, approximately 600 feet west of Tenaya
Way. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request on
08/26/99.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)


The City Council approved a petition of Vacation (VAC-0058-99) of a 10foot wide public drainage easement generally located south of Sky Pointe
01/19/00
Drive and west of Tenaya Way. The Planning Commission recommended
for a proposed Mini-Storage Facility on property located adjacent to the
04/05/00
southeast corner of Sky Pointe Drive and Tenaya Way. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the request on 02/24/00.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time [U-001000(1)] of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0010-00) for a proposed MiniStorage Facility on property located adjacent to the southeast corner of Sky
06/05/02
Pointe Drive and Tenaya Way. The Planning Commission recommended
The Planning and Development Department administratively approved a
request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-19902) to allow the
10/21/02
placement of panel antennas flush mounted to the face of the Veterinary
Clinic located at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive.
The Planning and Development Department administratively approved a
request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-27253) to allow the co03/07/08
location of four antennas to an existing roof-mounted wireless communication
facility located at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive.
The Planning and Development Department administratively denied a request
for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-54952) to install a new 86-foot tall
07/31/14
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) located at
5741 Sky Pointe Drive.

10/27/99

A building permit (#10268) was issued for a Certificate of Occupancy for a
Animal Hospital at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit was completed on
05/26/00
01/26/01.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over the
03/16/15
application materials and submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit for
a proposed Wireless Communication Facility use.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one conducted.
Field Check
04/30/15
A routine field check was conducted by staff and found that required
landscaping materials (trees/shrubs) located in the landscaping buffer adjacent
to the US-95 Highway have been removed.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.74 portion of a 4.40 acre commercial subdivision
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Animal Hospital
North
Motor Vehicle Sales

(New)
South
US Highway 95
East
Undeveloped
West
US Highway 95
Planned or Special
[SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Center) Special Land
Use designation]
[SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Use designation]
ROW (Right-of-Way)
[SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town
Use designation]
ROW (Right-of-Way)
T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)

ROW (Right-of-Way)
T-C (Town Center)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Master Plan Areas

Town Center Master Plan
T-C (Town Center) District
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

Street Name
Sky Pointe Drive
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Frontage Street
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section

and Highways
70 Feet
Pursuant to Special Use Permit (U-0070-99), the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Animal
7,411 SF
N/A *
17
21
Hospital
Wireless
Communicati
on Facility,
N/A
N/A
N/A
-2
Stealth Design
(Monopalm)
17
19
Y
16
1
19
2
Y
The approved site plan date stamped 05/24/00 associated with Special Use Permit (U-0070-99)
required the subject site to provide a minimum of 17 parking spaces, including one handicapped
parking space. The site plan indicated that the proposed Animal Hospital would contain four
offices, seven exam rooms and six employees.
Waivers
Requirement
A six-foot landscaping buffer is
required along the portion of the
southern property adjacent to
the parking lot area.
Request
To allow a zero-foot
landscaping buffer
along a portion of the
southern property line
adjacent to the parking
area where six feet is
the minimum required
Staff Recommendation
Approval
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to construct a new 86-foot tall Wireless Communication Facility,
Stealth Design (Monopalm) on property located at 5741 Sky Pointe Drive. The subject site is
located within the Town Center [SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center)] Special Land
Use designation, which refers to the Town Center Development Standards Manual for
permissible uses. According to the Town Center Development Standards Manual, a new
Wireless Communication Facility requires a Special Use Permit in the SC-TC (Service
Commercial Town Center land use district, if it is not made part of another structure.
According to the applicants justification letter, the new 86-foot tall Wireless Communication
Facility, Stealth Design (Monopalm) is necessary to enhance the cellular and internet coverage in
the community.
A Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design is described in Title 19.12 as A wireless
communication facility that is designed to blend into the surrounding environment. Examples
include without limitation: antenna tower alternative structures; roof mounted antennas (with
architectural screening when appropriate); building mounted antennas painted to match the
existing structure; antennas integrated into architectural elements (such as steeples or cupolas);
antennas and antenna structures designed to look like light poles, flagpoles, or any other
camouflaging techniques available on the market; and a cable microcell network which utilizes
multiple low powered transmitters/receivers or repeaters attached to existing wireline systems,
such as conventional cable or telephone wires, or similar technology that does not require the use
of towers.

A. A wireless communication facility is permitted if it utilizes stealth technology, (made part of another
structure and isnt visually discernible) and is not within 330 feet of any single-family detached
dwelling. Otherwise, a Special Use Permit is required.
The proposed Wireless Communication Facility incorporates a stealth design (Monopalm)

antenna, which is located approximately 550 Feet from a single-family detached dwelling.
However, the proposed structure is not designed to be made part of another structure and is
visually discernable from other structures located on the subject site, which requires the
approval of a Special Use Permit for the proposed use.
B. Towers and mono-poles are subject to LVMC 19.08.040(H) and shall be in conformance with
Chapter B, Section 5, subsection E (Mechanical and Electrical Equipment) of this Manual.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

According to the submitted site plan the proposed Wireless Communication Facility will
screen all associated mechanical equipment with a proposed eight-foot block wall, which
conforms to all LVMC 19.08.040(H) requirements.
The subject site is a 0.74 portion of a 4.40 acre commercial subdivision, which is currently
developed with an Animal Hospital land use. The approved site plan date stamped 05/24/00
associated with Special Use Permit (U-0070-99) required the subject site to provide a minimum
of 17 parking spaces, including one handicapped parking space. The existing site design
exceeded the minimum parking requirement and provided 21 spaces on-site with two
handicapped parking spaces.
According to the submitted site plan, the proposed Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Design (Monopalm) development will be developed in two parking spaces located on the
southeast corner of the subject site and will encroach into the existing six-foot landscaping buffer
along the southern perimeter of the property; leaving 19 parking spaces including two
handicapped spaces which meets the minimum parking requirements. The applicant has also
requested a Waiver (WVR-59161) to allow a zero-foot landscaping buffer along a portion of the
southern property line where six feet is the minimum required. It has been determined that the
proposed Wireless Communication Facility use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible
and harmonious manner with the surrounding land uses, therefore, staff is recommending
approval, as the use is considered appropriate for the surrounding area.
1.
The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a
manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses. The proposed Wireless
Communication Facility will be located along the southern perimeter of the subject site
adjacent to the existing elevated entrance to US Highway 95, and will have minimal
negative impact to surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is located within an existing commercial development that is physically
suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
JB
WVR-59161 & SUP-58661 (PRJ-58359)

3.
Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property from Sky Pointe Drive
a 70-foot Frontage Street as classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
4.
General Plan.
5.
The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Town Center Development
Standards Manual.
With the exception of the associated Waiver (WVR-59161) to allow a zero-foot
landscaping buffer along a portion of the southern property line where six feet is the
minimum required; the project meets the conditions of the Town Center Development
Standards Manual.
FINDINGS (WVR-59161)
As the proposed Waiver can be justified due to the existing landscaping buffer being located
adjacent to an existing elevated entrance to US Highway 95, which will have minimal negative
impact, staff recommends approval of the request with conditions.
NOTICES MAILED
387
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
32
JB
WVR-59161
WVR-59161
WVR-59161 and SUP-58661
WVR-59161 and SUP-58661
WVR-59161 and SUP-58661
WVR-59161 [PRJ-58359] - WAIVER RELATED TO SUP-58661 -APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC
5741 SKY POINTE DRIVE
04/30/15
WVR-59161 [PRJ-58359] - WAIVER RELATED TO SUP-58661 -APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC
5741 SKY POINTE DRIVE
04/30/15
77777
777
77
77
77
b77777777 7
A7777A7
777
777
7
777A7A7777777
7
777Ab7777b777b77777
7777777777b77777
78777777777777777
777
7
7777777777777
777777777777
7
7777777777777777
77777777777777777
77777777777
77
7777777777777C77
77777b7b
7777
7777777777777
7777777777777
77A7777777777777
77777777777777
7777777777777
7777777777
A77777777777777
777777777777777

777777777777777
8
777777777777787777

7777777777777777

77777777777877777
WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 - REVISED
7
77b7
777A7A7777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777
77777777777
7b
WVR-59161 and SUP-58661 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
FLINN FAGG
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-58661 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO WVR-59161 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS - OWNER: DOCGORM, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit TO INSTALL A NEW 86-FOOT TALL WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY, STEALTH DESIGN (MONOPALM) at 5741 Sky Pointe
Drive (APN 125-27-410-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town
Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58359]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map

paper use, backup
SUP-58661
SUP-58661

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-58904 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BRYZ GUYZ,
INC. - OWNER: DECATUR 215, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN
A PROPOSED 3,039 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH 503 SQUARE FEET OF
OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 6211 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite #120 (APN 125-25-614002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58639]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Postcards
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BRYZ GUYS, INC. - OWNER: DECATUR 215,
LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-58904
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Beer/Wine/Cooler
On-Sale use.
2.
3.
No alcohol beverage activity is authorized in the patio area without a barrier approved by
Business License staff.
4.
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and Safety.
5.
These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted for
building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.
6.
Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquors or
wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or booths are
provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
Conditions Page Two
7.
Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.
8.
This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Vegas
Municipal Code.
9.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This application is a request for a Special Use Permit to add a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment to a proposed restaurant located at 6211 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite #120.
The subject site is in an existing shopping center, which provides cross-access and shared
parking throughout the entire commercial center. The proposed use would be incorporated within
a proposed 3,039 square-foot restaurant and the adjoining 503 square-foot outdoor dining area,
bringing the total square-footage of the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use
to 3,542 square feet. The proposed use meets all Title 19.12 requirements and is compatible with
the other restaurant, retail and office uses located within the existing shopping center. Staff
recommends approval of the requested Special Use Permit, with conditions. If denied, no alcohol
may be served on the premises.
ISSUES
x
A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment is permitted in the C-1 (Limited

Commercial) zoning district with an approved Special Use Permit. Staff supports this
request.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0008-01) from
M (Medium Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial) and a Rezoning
(Z-0018-01) from a Resolution of Intent to R-PD15 (Residential Planned
06/06/01
Development - 15 Units per Acre) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on this site.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of both items.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [(Z-0018-01(1),
Z-0109-97(1), Z-0110-97(2)] which allowed a proposed 262,640 square-foot
07/05/01
retail commercial development, which included this parcel. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council granted Two-Year Extensions of Time (EOT-2504 and
EOT-2502) of an approved Rezoning (Z-0018-01) to C-1 (Limited
07/24/03
Commercial) and a Site Development Plan Review [(Z-0018-01(1), Z-010997(1), Z-0110-97(2)] for a proposed commercial development on this site.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)

The City Council granted Two-Year Extensions of Time (EOT-2504 and
EOT-2502) of an approved Rezoning (Z-0018-01) to C-1 (Limited
07/24/03
Commercial) and a Site Development Plan Review [(Z-0018-01(1), Z-010997(1), Z-0110-97(2)] for a proposed commercial development on this site.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-3624) for a twolot commercial subdivision (Decatur III) on 27.38 acres adjacent to the
08/12/04
northwest corner of Decatur Boulevard and Tropical Parkway. Staff
recommended approval. A Final Map for this site has not been submitted.
The City Council approved Extensions of Time (EOT-6798 and EOT-6799)
of an approved Rezoning (Z-0018-01) an approved Site Development Plan
07/06/05
Review [(Z-0018-01(1), Z-0109-97(1) and Z-0110-97(2)] for a proposed
commercial development on this site.
The City Council tabled a General Plan Amendment (GPA-14118), Rezoning
(ZON-14120), Variance (VAR-14122) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-14114) that would have created a PCD (Planned Community
10/18/06
Development) designation with a PD (Planned Development) zoning district
to create a residential and commercial master development.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-20771) for an
approved Rezoning (Z-0018-01), which extended the Resolution of Intent to
06/06/07
Staff
C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 3.6 acres of the project site.
The City Council approved the request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA22584) to amend a portion of the Northwest Sector of the General Plan from
the M (Medium Density Residential) to the SC (Service Commercial), a
request for a Rezoning (ZON-22583) from the R-E (Residence Estates)
zoning district under Resolution of Intent to R-PD15 (Residential Planned
Development - 15 Units per Acre) to the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
09/19/07
district on 9.05 acres on the south side of CC 215, approximately 730 feet
west of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval. The City Council approved a related Site
Development plan Review (SDR-22582) for a 458,053 square-foot retail
center on 36.43 acres at the northwest corner of Decatur Boulevard and
Tropical Parkway. The Planning Commission recommended approval and
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-25055) for a onelot Commercial Subdivision on 36.43 acres at the subject property. Staff
11/29/07
The City Council approved a Review of Condition (ROC-25100) to remove
Condition #1 of EOT-20771, which stated that the Rezoning (Z-0018-01)
12/05/07
shall expire on June 6, 2008 unless another Extension Of Time is approved.
Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)

The City Council approved a Master Site Plan (MSP-25930) for an approved
458,053 square-foot retail center on 36.43 acres at the northwest corner of
2/20/08
Decatur Boulevard and Tropical Parkway.
Staff administratively approved a Minor Amendment (SDR-53458) of an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-22582) for proposed parapet
04/07/14
screening for an 8,286 square-foot building on 16.18 acres at 6171 North
Decatur Boulevard.

12/27/07

A Building Permit (#121353) was issued for a new shell building at 6171
01/07/13
North Decatur Boulevard (Pad G).
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a
04/01/15
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use in conjunction with a restaurant at 6171 North
Decatur Boulevard, Suite #120.

Site Area
Gross Acres
16.18
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Shopping Center
Right-of-Way: CC215
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
Right-of-Way: CC-215

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Right-of-Way: CC-215
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
Surrounding
Property
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Single-Family,
Detached
ML (Medium Low
Undeveloped
Single-Family,
Detached
City of North Las

Vegas: Community
Commercial
M (Medium Density
Residential)

R-PD8 (Residential
Planned Development - 8
Units per Acre)
City of North Las Vegas:
C-2 (General
Commercial)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Decatur Boulevard
Tropical Parkway
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Primary Arterial
Secondary
Collector
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
100
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
80
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
458,053 SF
1:250 SF
1,833
Center
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1,833
2,520
Y
1,804
29
2,476
44
Y
3:50,000
SF +
Loading
11 On-Site
11 On-Site
458,053 SF
Y
1:50,000
Spaces
Loading Spaces
Loading Spaces
SF
ANALYSIS
The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is defined by Title 19.12 as an establishment
whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers only for
consumption on the premises where the same is sold. The proposed use meets the definition
above, as the provided floor plan and justification letter detail the sale of beer, wine and coolers
in conjunction with a restaurant to be consumed on the premises only.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler on-sale establishment (hereinafter
establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected uses within 400 feet
of the subject property.
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall
be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and
does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.
This does not apply to this project.
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in
size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as the parcel on which it is
proposed is less than 80 acres in size.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.
This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as no distance separation waiver is
necessary.
5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with
a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor
space.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
Neither condition applies to the proposed use.

6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC
Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as it is a condition of approval of the
Special Use Permit.
The proposed use would be located within an established shopping center with retail and
restaurant uses located on the site interior. The existing shopping center provides cross-access
and shared parking throughout the commercial center. No additional parking is required beyond
that which is required for the principal use on the site, as parking requirements were addressed
during the original development of this site.
The subject site is located within 500 feet of a city boundary with Clark County. As such, the
applicant was required to provide a Project of Regional Significance. The submitted document,
date stamped 04/15/15, indicates the proposed use would have a negligible effect on the
neighborhoods existing mass transit and emergency services needs. Also, no protected uses are
located within 400 feet of the subject property. For these reasons, the proposed use is deemed
compatible with the surrounding uses; therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.
1.
The proposed location for the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment is compatible
with the surrounding land uses. No waiver of minimum distance separation requirements
from protected uses is required.
2.
The proposed use will operate within a proposed 3,039 square-foot restaurant with
associated 503 square-foot outdoor dining area within an existing shopping center. The site
is appropriate for the proposed use.
YK
SUP-58904 (PRJ-58639)
3.
The primary access to the site is from Decatur Boulevard, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial
as designated on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways map. Secondary access is from
Tropical Parkway, an 80-foot wide Secondary Collector street. The proposed use will be in
addition to a proposed restaurant and will have negligible increase in traffic and parking to
the site.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment will be subject to regular
inspections by regulatory agencies for business licensing, and will therefore, not
compromise the public health, safety and general welfare, or the overall objectives of
the General Plan.
5.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment meets all distance separation
requirements per Title 19.12. Conditions of approval ensure conformance with all other
minimum requirements for the use.
NOTICES MAILED
1093
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
26
YK
SUP-58904
SUP-58904
SUP-58904
777

SUP-58904

A bb7 bb
7
7
7

7

SUP-58904 [PRJ-58639] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: BRYZ GUYZ, INC. - OWNER: DECATUR
215, LLC
6211 NORTH DECATUR BOULEVARD, SUITE #120
04/30/15
A
AAAA
.A
7777777b7
A
7
7777777777777
..AA
7777777777777A77
A
@
A
AA
A
A
b
77777777777777
@
7
..@
77
..
77
..
bbb
7777b777777b7b777
b77777A77
7
7
7
SUP-58904
A
b
b)Ab
77A777777b777
A

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
AAAbA
SUP-58904

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59041 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GRIND
MODE 1, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A TRUCK
RENTAL USE at 2901 North Rancho Drive (APN 138-13-601-019), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58919]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GRIND MODE 1, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59041
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Truck Rental use.
2.
All signage shall be permitted and meet minimum code requirements within 30 days of final
approval.
3.
4.
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and Safety
5.
6.
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to add a Truck Rental use to the existing
convenience store, at 2901 North Rancho Drive. The Truck Rental use will operate at a counter
within the existing convenience store, and would be accessory to the retail use. Two new
parking spaces will be located in the rear of the property that will be dedicated for the rental
vehicles. The site is parking impaired; however, the applicant will provide the additional parking
spaces required per the original entitlement. The parcel is part of a commercial development and
shares access and parking throughout the site. The primary uses for the site will remain a
convenience store, a car wash and Auto Repair Garage, Minor. Staff recommends approval of
the Special Use Permit.
ISSUES
x The Truck Rental use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with
x The site is parking impaired. An additional two parking spaces are needed to accommodate
the Truck Rental use.
The City Council approved Special Use Permit and Plot Plan Review (U0128-96) request to for an Automated Car Wash and the Off-Premise Sale of
12/18/96
Beer and Wine in conjunction with a convenience store at 2951 North Rancho
Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [U-0128-96 (2)] request for
Special Use Permit and Plot Plan Review [U-0128-96 (1)] to allow an
02/09/99
Automated Car Wash and the Off-Premise Sale of Beer and Wine in
conjunction with a convenience store at 2951 North Rancho Drive. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [U-0128-96 (1)] request for
Special Use Permit and Plot Plan Review (U-0128-96) for an Automated Car
02/23/98
Wash and the Off-Premise Sale of Beer and Wine in conjunction with a
convenience store at 2951 North Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval.
A complaint (#102279) was filed with Code Enforcement for non-permitted
05/25/11
signage. The complaint was resolved on 06/11/11.
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)

12/01/11
07/01/14
02/12/15
A building permit (#9902338) for a Car Was and Convenience Store at 2901
12/07/99
North Rancho Drive. The permit was finalized on 08/23/00.
A building permit (#99016500) for an Auto Lube building at 2901 North
08/19/99
Rancho Drive. The permit was finalized on 09/09/00.
A building permit was issued for an interior improvement at 2901 North
06/06/12
Rancho Drive. The permit was finalized on 12/10/12.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss submittal
requirements for possible parking Variance and Special Use Permit
applications related to the addition of Truck Rental within an existing
04/16/15
convenience store. The applicant was informed that the site is parking
impaired and only the additional parking spaces generated by the proposed
rental use are needed to satisfy the parking requirement.
Field Check
04/30/15
A site inspection was conducted on the property, which revealed the site had a
number of non-permitted signs and trash and debris throughout the site. A
complaint was filed with Code Enforcement on 05/05/15.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.0
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
Car Wash, Full
Service or Auto
Detailing
Auto Repair Garage,
Minor
Planned or Special
M (Medium Density
Residential)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Open Air Vending/

Transient Sales Lot
North
South
Multi-Family
Residential
Multi-Family
Residential
East
Airport, Heliport or
Landing Field
West
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
Public / Simi Public

(City of North Las
Vegas)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
R-PD20 (Residential
Planned Development
20 Units per Acre)
R-PD14 (Residential
Planned Development
14 Units per Acre)
M-2 (Industrial General)
(City of North Las Vegas)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12 and Special Use Permit (U-0128-96), the following parking
standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
General Retail
1:175
Store, Other
4,683 SF
27
GFA
Than Listed
1 Per
Rental
Vehicle
Truck Rental
N/A
2
plus
1:250
GFA
Car Wash,
Full Service
1:150
3,180 SF
22
or Auto
GFA
Detailing
5 plus
Auto Repair
1,738 SF
14
1:200
Garage, Minor
GFA
Open Air
Vending/
N/A
0
0
Transient
Sales Lot
Parking
N/A
-33*
impairment
32
32
Y
31
1
31
1
Y
* The site is parking impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D). Per Special Use Permit (U0128-96) the parking requirement for the site is 30 parking spaces. The existing site contains 30
parking spaces, including one handicapped accessible space. The applicant is required to provide
two additional parking spaces for the Truck Rental use as, no additional floor space will be
dedicated for leasing of vehicles.
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)
ANALYSIS
The Truck Rental use is defined by Title 19.18 as A facility for the rental of new or used trucks.
For purposes of the limitations of this Title on outside storage, trucks kept on a lot for rental
purposes are not considered to be outside storage.
The applicant meets this definition. Per the justification letter date stamped 05/06/15 and the site
plan date stamped 05/07/15, as the applicant intends to lease two U-Haul trucks.
There are no minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for Truck Rental use. The leasing of
vehicles will occur at the checkout counter of the existing convenience store. Two new parking
spaces will be created and located in the southwest corner of the parcel. The two parking spaces
will be dedicated for the Truck Rental use if approved. Per Plot Plan Review and Special Use
Permit U-0128-96 (1) the parking requirement for this site is 30 parking spaces. With the
additional Truck Rental use, 32 parking spaces are required and proposed to be provided.
The subject property is within 500 feet of the County of Clarks jurisdiction; therefore, this
request qualifies as a Project of Regional Significance. All the proper documents were
completed and distributed to the required departments and agencies; however, no comments
were returned.
As there are no minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for Truck Rental use and the use
complies with code requirements. The proposed parking location is screened from the public
right-of-way to the west and residential properties to the north and south, as such the Truck
Retail use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with existing
neighborhood and surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of this request.
1.
The proposed Truck Rental use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district with approval of a Special Use Permit; the adjacent land uses are an Auto Repair
Garage, Minor, Multi-Family Residential and the North Las Vegas Airport. The Truck
Rental use would be ancillary to the primary use of a convenience store. Rental sale will
occur at the existing checkout counter. A maximum of two vehicles would be available
for rental.
MR
SUP-59041 (PRJ-58919)
2.
The two-acre site is parking impaired, but the applicant has provided the required
additional parking for the Truck Rental use. The proposed truck rental use is appropriate
for this site and the surrounding area.
3.
Site access is provided from Rancho Drive, a 125-foot Expressway, as classified by the
Master Plan of Streets and Highways, with sufficient size to accommodate the needs of the
proposed Truck Rental use.
4.
General Plan.
The Truck Rental use proposed for the site will be regulated through licensing, thereby
protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.
5.
The proposed use conforms to all minimum conditions for the Truck Rental use.
NOTICES MAILED
172
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
MR
SUP-59041
SUP-59041
SUP-59041 - REVISED
SUP-59041
SUP-59041 [PRJ-58919] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT/OWNER: GRIND MODE 1, LLC

2901 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE
04/30/15
7 77 7b
77 7777 7 7 7 7
7Ab77 7 7 77777 7 7 77
7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 77 777
7 7 7 7 7 7 777 77 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 7 777 77 7
77
7 7 7 77 7 7A7 77
77 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 72 7 7 7 7
7 7777777 777
7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 77 7
7 7 7 77 7 77 7 7 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
77
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
SUP-59041

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAC-58900 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: KAREN
LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For a possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 20-foot
wide public drainage easement generally located at the northwest corner of Coke Street and
Maggie Avenue, Ward 6 (Ross). Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Postcard
VAC-58900

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: COKE AND CONOUGH
CASE
NUMBER
VAC-58900
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
VAC-58900 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be a 20-foot wide portion of the Public Drainage
Easement granted by the recorded Final Map of Coke and Conough, Book 118, Page 40
generally located west of Grizzly Street.
2.
Prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation, a revised plan showing the
retaining/property wall being relocated and the revised grading of all four of the lots to
accommodate the area of the vacation shall be approved by the Flood Control Section of the
Department of Public Works. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until after the
construction of the wall for all four properties is completed and all permits are issued a final
inspection as per the approved plan.
3.
All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application are
to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an Order of
Vacation.
4.
All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of all
City Departments.
RG
VAC-58900
Conditions Page Two
5.
The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been
met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public improvements may
be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance
thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is
empowered to modify this application if necessary because of technical concerns or because
of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still
complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a five
foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all
vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and available for
public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public easement corridors and sight
visibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-of-way or easement being
vacated must be retained.
6.
If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within three (3) years after approval by the City of
Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will
terminate and a new petition must be submitted.
RG
VAC-58900
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The property owners of Lots 1 through 4 of the Coke and Conough Residential Subdivision are
requesting a petition to vacate the existing 20-foot wide Public Drainage Easement. The
recorded Final Map Book 118 Page 40 indicates the easement along the western boundary of the
residential subdivision, where Lots 1 through 4 exists.
ISSUES
x
The Petition to Vacate is necessary as the drainage easement is no longer required as no

right-of-way is proposed.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-1177) a portion of the
southern 50 feet of Iron Mountain Road, generally located between Conough
02/05/03
Lane and Buffalo Drive, and a portion of the eastern 30 feet of Conough Lane
between Iron Mountain Road and Maggie Street. The Planning Commission
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-1179) for a 19lot Single-Family Residential Development on 10.72 acres adjacent to the
02/27/03
southeast corner of Iron Mountain Road and Conough Lane. The Department
of Planning staff recommended approval.
The Final Map Technical Review (FMP-3349) was approved for a 19-lot
06/09/04
Single-Family Residential Development located to the southeast corner of
Iron Mountain Road and Conough Lane.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-3902) to allow 25-foot front
setbacks, where 30 feet is the minimum setback required and to allow 25-foot
06/16/04
rear setbacks, where 35 feet is the minimum setback required on 9.46 acres on
the northwest corner of Maggie Avenue and Coke Street. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Review of Condition (ROC-5319) number eight
(8) of an approved Tentative Map of Coke and Conough (TMP-1179) which
required off-site improvements for a 19-Lot Single-Family Residential
12/01/04
Development on 10-72 acres adjacent to the southeast corner of Iron
Mountain Road and Conough Lane. The Department of Planning staff
RG
VAC-58900

10/20/14
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership for APN 125-09-510-001.
05/21/14
03/21/14
02/06/15

A building permit (#101907) was issued for a Residential dwelling at 9017
11/14/07
Grizzly Street. The permit expired on 05/04/08 and the dwelling was not
constructed.
Grizzly Street. The permit was finalized on 09/09/14.
09/04/13
Grizzly Street. The permit was finalized on 09/09/14.
Cinnamon Bear Avenue. The permit was finalized on 02/27/14.
An email message discussing the submittal requirements for a Petition of
03/15/15
Vacation was sent to the applicant.
Field Check
04/30/2015
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
West
Staff conducted a field check and noted that the subject Public Drainage
Easement to be vacated contains a perimeter wall on the easement line, except
for Lot 1.
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single-Family,
Detached
Public Park
Planned or Special
DR (Desert Rural
Parks/Recreation/Open
Space

C-V (Civic)
RG
VAC-58900
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
South
Single-Family,
Detached
East
Single-Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation) [Clark
County]
RE (Rural Estates

R-E (Rural Estates) [Clark
County]
U (Undeveloped)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The 20-foot wide Public Drainage Easement granted along the west property lines of APN 12509-510-001, APN 125-09-510-002, APN 125-09-510-003 and APN 125-09-510-004 on Book
118, Page 0040 of Subdivision Plats not including the north 20 feet granted on APN 125-09-510004.
ANALYSIS
A condition of approval of the Tentative Map (TMP-1179) for the subject 19-lot Residential
Subdivision requires a, Drainage Plan and Technical Study to be submitted prior to recordation
of a Final Map. Due to the subdivisions proximity to the Clark County Regional Flood Control
District (CCRFCD) master planned facility, as recommended by the approved drainage study
(DS3304) for the project a minimum 20-foot drainage easement or right-of-way must be reserved
from Iron Mountain Road to accommodate this proposed facility. The property walls must be
moved back 20 feet to allow for this proposed facility and the area must be made a common lot
of the subdivision if it is to be reserved as a Public Drainage Easement.
The Public Drainage Easement to be vacated is located along Lots 1 through 4, except the last 20
feet within Lot 4. Currently Lot 1 is undeveloped while Lots 2 through 4 contains single-family
RG
VAC-58900
dwelling on each lot. The need for the 20-foot wide Public Drainage Easement is no longer
required in this subdivision. The Floyd Lamb Park geographical is an Alluvial Plain. Since the
development of the subject subdivision, the City of Las Vegas Public Works has constructed
Detention Basins; therefore, the need for drainage is easement is no longer required for this
subdivision.
The Public Works Department has provided the following comments:
This Vacation application proposes to vacate a 20-foot wide public drainage easement
generally located at the northwest corner of Coke Street and Maggie Avenue. As no rightof-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not
necessary to send this VAC request to the utility companies and franchise holders, nor
wait for their responses. Since only City easements are involved, any utility company
interests will need to be addressed with each respective utility company and will not be
affected by the City vacating its interest. Furthermore, Public Works recommend that this
item be declared final action at Planning Commission.
NOTICES MAILED
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
24
RG
VAC-58900 - VACATION -APPLICANT/OWNER: KAREN LIVINGSTON, ET AL

NORTHWEST CORNER OF COKE STREET AND MAGGIE AVENUE
04/30/15
VAC-58900 - VACATION -APPLICANT/OWNER: KAREN LIVINGSTON, ET AL

NORTHWEST CORNER OF COKE STREET AND MAGGIE AVENUE
04/30/15

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAC-59025 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a
20-foot wide public alley right-of-way located between Silver Dollar Avenue and Pennwood
Avenue, east of Valley View Boulevard and west of Wing Street, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ58958]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAC-59025 (PRJ-58958)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS
PROPERTIES, LLC
RESIDENTIAL
CASE
NUMBER
VAC-59025
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
The limits of this Petition of Vacation are defined as the alley south of Silver Dollar
Avenue, north of Pennwood Avenue, east of Wing Street and west of Valley View
Boulevard.
2.
Prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation, provide a plan showing how the
right-of-way will be incorporated into the adjacent properties. If a mapping action is
proposed, the Order of Vacation shall record immediately prior to that mapping action.
3.
This Petition of Vacation shall be revised to retain a Public Sewer Easement in favor
of Clark County and to retain a Public Drainage Easement in favor of the City of Las
Vegas.
4.
Prior to the recordation of this vacation, construction drawings showing the proposed
gating of the alley shall be approved by the City of Las Vegas Traffic Engineer.
5.
Prior to the recordation of this Petition of Vacation, meet with the Flood Control
Section of the Department of Public Works to determine if any storm drains and
related facilities will need to be relocated.
YK
VAC-59025 (PRJ-58958)
Conditions Page Two
6.
All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation.
7.
The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval
have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient
security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of
the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary
because of technical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as
current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the
vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public
streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting
public street corridors that will remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if
applicable and where needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other
easements that would/should cross any right-of-way or easement being vacated must
be retained.
8.
Reservation of easements for the facilities of the various utility companies together
with reasonable ingress thereto and egress there from shall be provided if required.
9.
All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards
of all City Departments.
10. If the Order of Vacation (or Order of Relinquishment of Interest if a Patent

Reservation) is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las
Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval
will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.
YK
VAC-59025 (PRJ-58958)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is petitioning to vacate a 20-foot x 1,250-foot, City of Las Vegas public right-ofway (alley) located between Valley View Boulevard on the east, Wing Street on the west, Silver
Dollar Avenue on the north and Pennwood Avenue on the south. There are 34 parcels adjacent
to the alley and all are owned by the applicant. The applicant is making the request in order to
limit access, as a crime deterrent. Staff recommends approval.
ISSUES
x
A Petition to Vacate (VAC-59025) application is required and has been applied for to
close off a public right-of-way (alley). Staff supports this request.

Records indicate that deeds were recorded for a change in ownership on all 34
11/01/11
parcels adjacent to the proposed alley vacation request.
Staff met with the applicant and discussed the requirements for a Vacation
04/21/15
application to vacate a public alley. Records indicate all adjacent properties
are owned by a single owner.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff visited the site and found a clean alley. There were power lines and
trash enclosures, as well as parking located within this right-of-way.
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (175-Feet)
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
YK
VAC-59025 (PRJ-58958)

Trails
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Valley View
Boulevard
Silver Dollar
Avenue
Pennwood Avenue
Wing Street
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Secondary
Collector
Minor Collector
Street
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Street
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
55
75
60
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ALL THAT AREA SOUTH OF LOTS 1 -17 AND NORTH OF LOTS 18 34 IN BLOCK
FIVE (5) AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL MAP OF FABULOUS FORTY AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 2 OF CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ANALYSIS
The applicant proposes to vacate the public alley that runs parallel with Pennwood Avenue and
Silver Dollar Street between Wing Street and Valley View Boulevard. It is the applicants intent
to provide enhanced security for the 34 Multi-Family Residential buildings by eliminating public
access to this alley. The existing alley will be required to retain a 20-foot public sewer easement
or the applicant can construct a sanitary sewer manhole to separate public and private
maintenance as well as modify the remaining public sewer in the alley to be a private sewer.
With regard to the request to vacate a public right-of-way (alley), the Department of Public
Works presents the following information concerning the request:
A. Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way widths?
Not Applicable as it is to completely eliminate a public alley.
YK
VAC-59025 (PRJ-58958)
B. From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced
traffic handling capability? No, as it is not a through street and only used for adjacent
residents.
C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-way? No, it is
for an alley.
D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the adjacent parcels?
No, the vacated alley will be gated to provide security for the adjacent residents.
E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting parcel? No.
F. Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City requirements?
No.
G. Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation request?
No.
FINDINGS (VAC-59025)
Staff has no objection to the vacation of this public right-of-way (alley). Staff recommends
approval with conditions.
NOTICES MAILED
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
33
YK
VAC-59025
VAC-59025
VAC-59025
VAC-59025
VAC-59025
VAC-59025 [PRJ-58958] - VACATION -APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES,

LLC
BETWEEN SILVER DOLLAR AVENUE AND PENNWOOD AVENUE, EAST OF VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
AND WEST OF WING STREET
04/30/15
VAC-59025 [PRJ-58958] - VACATION -APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES,

LLC
BETWEEN SILVER DOLLAR AVENUE AND PENNWOOD AVENUE, EAST OF VALLEY VIEW BOULEVARD
AND WEST OF WING STREET
04/30/15
VAC-59025

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
GPA-58199 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: DFA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: MXU (MIXED USE) AND C (COMMERCIAL) TO: LI/R (LIGHT
INDUSTRY /RESEARCH) on 28.55 acres at the northeast corner of Bonanza Road and
Clarkway Drive (APNs 139-28-302-001, 002, 003, 012, 014, 031, 032 and 034; and 139-28-303001 and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58196]. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
C.C.: 7/15/2015
37
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
1. Abeyance Request Submitted by APTUS - GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 [PRJ-58196]
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 [PRJ-58196]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 [PRJ-58196]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 [PRJ-58196]
6. Protest/Support Postcards and Letters - GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 [PRJ-58196]
GPA-58199
CLV Planning - Application Form

Application Number:
PRJ-58196
Application/Petition For:
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning - Multiple properties
ProjectAddress (Location):
MULTIPLE PROPERTIES
Project Name
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING - MULTIPLE PRO
Assessors Parcel #(s):
13928302001, 13928302002, 13928302003, 13928302012, 13928302014, 13928302031, 13928302032,

13928302034, 13928303001, 13928303003, 13928303005, 13928303007, 13928303008, 13928303009,
13928303011
Ward #:
WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)
Is the Application Information

Correct:
Yes
If no, ...change what

General Plan Designation: Proposed: LI/R
Zoning District: Proposed:
M - Industrial
Gross Acres:
30.56
Lots/Units:
Additional Information:
Applicant First Name:
Don
Applicant Last Name:
Ahern
Applicant Address:
1401 Mineral Ave.
Applicant City:
Las Vegas
Applicant State:
Nevada
Applicant Zip:
89016
Applicant Phone:
(702)287.5331
Applicant Fax:
n/a
Applicant Email:
dave@ahern.com
Rep First Name:
Kristen
Rep Last Name:
Neuman
Rep Address:
1200 S. 4th Street, Ste 206
Rep City:
Las Vegas
Rep State:
Nevada
Rep Zip:
89104
Rep Phone:
(702) 839-1200
Rep Fax:
(702) 893-1213
Rep Email:
kristen@aptusgroup.com
GPA-58199 and ZON-58200

3/4/2015 10:07:58 AM
Page 1 of 2

I certify that I am the applicant and
that the information submitted with
this application is true and accurate
to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City is
not responsible for inaccuracies in
information presented, and that
inaccuracies, false information or
incomplete application may cause
the application to be rejected. I
further certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) of
the property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agent
fully authorized by the owner to
make this submission.
I Accept:
Yes
Is the Owner Information Correct:
Yes
Owner(s)
ADDR1
ADDR2
DFALLC
1401 MINERAL AVE
LAS VEGAS, NV 89106-4342
CLVEPLAN Applicant
Company
Title
Email
Kristen Neuman
APTUS
Project Architect
kristen@aptusgroup.com
GPA-58199 and ZON-58200

3/4/2015 10:07:58 AM
Page 2 of 2
7
A7A
7A
77
7AA7A
7A777
7A7A
bAA7
A7A
7A
7 A7
A7
A7A
A7
bb7
A7
A7b7A
7bA7A
77A
777
777
777
77
A77777A
77
A7
A
A7A
b
A7b
A7b
b7b
7A
7AA7
b b
b777b
7777
77
7777

7
77
b b
b777b
77
b777b
7777
b777b
7b7777
bb
bb77
b b
b7b
GPA-58199
b777b
b

b
b777b
b
b
b7777b
b

77
7

77777
777

777
77 77
77 7 7 777b
777 7
7 7777
77
777
b77
7777
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
APPLICANT/OWNER: DFA, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF BONANZA ROAD AND CLARKWAY DRIVE
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199
[PRJ-58196]
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
03/05/15
ZON-58200
GPA-58199 and ZON-58200 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-58200 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-58199 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: DFA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: RE (RESIDENCE ESTATES) AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO: M (INDUSTRIAL)
on 28.55 acres at the northeast corner of Bonanza Road and Clarkway Drive (APNs 139-28-302001, 002, 003, 012, 014, 031, 032 and 034; and 139-28-303-001 and 003), Ward 5 (Barlow)
[PRJ-58196]. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
C.C.: 7/15/2015
37
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.

paper use, backup
ZON-58200
7
A7A
7A
77
7AA7A
7A777
7A7A
bAA7
A7A
7A
7 A7
A7
A7A
A7
bb7
A7
A7b7A
7bA7A
77A7
A777A
777
77
77
7
7777
b77
b
A7
A
A7A
b
A7b
A7b
b7b
7A
7AA7
77
7
777
777
77A
77
7
777
77
777
7
777
b77b
b
b

777

77
777b
7b77
ZON-58200

777
b b
b77b
b
b
b777b
b b
b777b
b777b
b b
777

b777b
b b
777

b
b777

b
b777b
77 77
77 7 7 777b
777 7
7 7777
77
777
b7
7777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SUP-57330 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HOMELESS HELPERS - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW
FOUR PARKING SPACES WHERE 18 SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED
GENERAL PERSONAL SERVICE USE at 200 Foremaster Lane (APN 139-27-504-002), C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-56939]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcards and Support Letter
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: HOMELESS HELPERS
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-57330
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
The alternative parking demand analysis date stamped 06/02/15 is hereby approved. The
alternative parking standard is valid for the duration of the General Personal Service use at
the site. The alternative parking standard shall expire, when this use ceases to operate on
the site.
2.
To allow 4 parking spaces, where 19 parking spaces are required for a General Personal
Service use is hereby approved.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
YK
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to locate a General Personal Service use for homeless veterans within
an existing 4,713 square-foot commercial building at 200 Foremaster Lane. The use is
permissible in the C-2 (General Commercial) zone; however, the proposal does not comply with
the minimum parking requirements for the proposed General Personal Service use.
The applicant is requesting relief from the parking requirement via a Special Use Permit for an
Alternative Parking Standard to allow four parking spaces where 19 are required. Staff
recommends approval of the application. If denied, the proposed General Personal Service use
could not be located on the site.
ISSUES
x
A Special Use Permit is required for an Alternative Parking Standard to allow four
parking spaces, where a minimum of 18 parking spaces is required. Staff supports this
request.
No related actions are on file for this parcel.
08/15/14
CC. 1963
A building was constructed on the site.
Staff met with the applicant and advised that the Downtown North Land Use
Plan strongly recommends against any additional homeless social service
11/20/14
providers be located in the area. Two Special Use Permits would be needed:
Social Service Provider and for an Alternative Parking Plan.
YK
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]
A voluntary community meeting was held from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Attendees: 4 Applicants 3 CLV staff (including CM Barlow) 2
METRO Officers 28 Members of the Public
02/24/15
Potential Issues
x *Applicant mentioned that someone will be living on-site as a
caretaker for the facility*
o Councilman Barlow had concerns with this due to building and
safety/zoning codes.
x *The applicant mentioned that the facility may be used by other
agencies for drug and alcohol counseling. They also indicated that the
subject property currently has a 2,000 square-foot area built-out as a
church; they indicated that they would allow neighborhood churches
to use the facility during the weekends.
o These are different land uses which are not indicated in the
Justification Letter submitted by the applicant.
Constituents Concerns
x Concerns were raised over the handling of loitering homeless in the
area by the Metro Police
x A representative for Palm Mortuary expressed concerned about the
spillover effects this proposed use will have on surrounding
businesses.
o Expressed concerns about people previously distributing food
and services in their parking lot or on the right-of-way in front
of their property blocking their ingress/egress, disrupting their
business and damaging property.
x Concerns were raised about what an alternative parking analysis is and
why it was requested with this proposal.
The applicant explained that it was similar to a parking Variance and
Code requirement for the proposed use allows for this type of
request to address the parking needs of the project.
Field Check
01/06/15
Staff visited the site and found a vacant building with a fence surrounding the
property. It appeared as if the property was being cleaned at the time.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.24
YK
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Vacant
South
East
Social Service
Provider (Homeless
Shelter)
Crematory
Crematory
West
Retail
North
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)

C-2 (General
Commercial)
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
PF (Public Facilities)
GC (General
Commercial)
C-V (Civic)
C-V (Civic)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Downtown North Land Use Plan
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 200-Feet
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Foremaster Lane
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Local
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
60
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
General
Personal
4,713 SF
1/250 SF
18
Services
18
4
N
YK
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
17
1
3
1
N
Loading
1
1
Y
Spaces
Percent Deviation
79%
N*
*A Special Use Permit for an Alternative Parking Standard has been applied for.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Downtown North Land Use
boundaries, and has a General Commercial (GC) land use designation. The C-2 (General
Commercial) designation allows a General Personal Service use, as proposed.
The General Personal Service use is defined as a facility for the sale of personal services.
Typical personal services include barber/beauty shop, tanning salon, nail salon, shoe repair,
tailor, instructional arts studio, photography studio, handcrafted art studio, safe deposit boxes,
house cleaning service, weight reduction center, day spa, florist (excluding greenhouses),
astrologer/hypnotist/psychic art or science, dry cleaners, electrical/watch/clock/jewelry or similar
repair, and permanent makeup establishment. There are no minimum requirements for the
proposed use.
The applicant has provided an Alternative Parking Demand Analysis that was prepared by a
Nevada licensed Professional Engineer. Within the analysis an alternative parking standard was
proposed based on observations of a similar use in the area. A parking ration of 0.829 stalls per
1000 square feet was established. Based on this standard, the proposed 4,713 General Personal
Services use would only require four parking stalls. This is the number that the applicant is
providing with this request. Staff recommends approval.
1.
YK
SUP-57330 [PRJ-56939]
This project is compatible with the Downtown North Land Use Plan and therefore, is
appropriate for the area.
2.
Although the proposed use is appropriate for the commercial site, the proposal cannot
adhere to minimum parking requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The submitted
parking demand analysis substantiates a reduced number of parking spaces required and
therefore, the intensity of land use is acceptable.
3.
Site access is provided by Foremaster Lane, a 60-foot wide local street. This is adequate to
meet the use proposed for the site.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of the Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health safety and
general welfare. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subject to licensing
restrictions.
5.
Aside from the parking deviation that is requested with this application, all other
requirements of Title 19.12 are being met.
NOTICES MAILED
48
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
17
YK
SUP-57330
PRJ-56939
12/24/14

Application Number:
PRJ-56939
SUP for Social Service and one for Alternative parking standards
200 FOREMASTER LANE
Project Name
CARE
13927504002
Ward #:
WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)

Correct:
Yes

General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Select
Gross Acres:
1.0
Lots/Units:
N/A
N/A
Homeless
Helpers
Applicant Address:
200 Foremaster Lane
Applicant City:
Las Vegas
Applicant State:
Nevada
Applicant Zip:
89101
Applicant Phone:
(702) 624-5792
Applicant Fax:
(702) 243-2377
Applicant Email:
arnoldstalk@gmail.com
Rep First Name:
Arnold
Rep Last Name:
Stalk PhD
Rep Address:
840 South Rancho Drive Suite #4
Rep City:
Las Vegas
Rep State:
Nevada
Rep Zip:
89106
Rep Phone:
(702) 624-5792
Rep Fax:
(702) 243-2377
Rep Email:
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331

12/29/2014 12:11:26 PM
Page 1 of 2

I Accept:
Yes
Yes
Owner(s)
ADDR1
ADDR2
HOMELESS HELPERS
1924 WENDELL AVE
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
CLVEPLAN Applicant
Company
Title
Email
Arnold Stalk
Arnold Stalk PhD
Development Consultant
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/29/2014 12:11:26 PM
Page 2 of 2
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14
PRJ-56939
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14
PRJ-56939
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14
PRJ-56939
7 4 . 38
68
057
052
044 045
024
019
55
55
5 0
022
300
446.23
008
0.34
300
003
3.03
406
001
0.31
007
2.53
300
005
1.04
450
004
1.25
501
006
0.34
SF 183-88
027
024
50
. 98
5 4
404
004
110.05
L=4 3.39
019
264.55
>
026
6
6
50
A ST
15
. 05
016
147.66
148.8
002
0.09
010
4.16
184.95
184.64
243.9
244.06
013
600
PT
13927601 006
60
043
50
1 00
24 4.74
50
5 0
10
400
100
98-001
160
98-002
163.52
1 64 .47
6 3
MAP LEGEND
011
005
50
50
006
1 31.54
115
001
0.58
012
715.42
006
10.1 7
718
14
1
11 9
354.98
5
86
76. 66
502
169.6
172.81
PT 2
1 52.1
500.15
LEASE
022
0.6
54.16
PT 1
007
0.84
2 72.16
018
3.16
4 37.39
44 0.23
99.26
044
86
50.25
027
0.04
63.1
030
013
3.06
PM 78-1
PT 1 LEASE
10
021
1.19
104.32
006
007
2 95.91
003
014
387.2
3 89.27
389.27
PT 1
020
3.05
PM 107-96
2 25.67
60
202
107.83
156.84
2 04.29
55
OWENS
>AVE
013
239.98
003
4.86
002
97.34
1 1
PT 2
042
1 24
1 77
1 76
1 60
1 79
1 61
178
1 22
1 41
1 23
1 40
50
93.37
019
1.69
Scale: 1" = 200'
1 62
1 39
1 63
1 38
1 25
T20S R61E
018
023
1 76
. 4
1 76
.
39
016
1.18
32
30
31
R=
. 99
039
R=54
12
11
14
10
15
25
26
35
27
34
4
.3
5
028
3 19
105.18
105.18
006
006
0.7
0.7
85.
99
64
035
040
R=54
008
PTU
9
0.
84
106.19
56.04
56.04
12/24/14
7
8
5
219.99
025
R=25
10
033
038
R=25
10 40
028
028
3.88
PT 1
014
56.32
010
012
R=25
L=39 31
PM 6
005
013
TAX DIST 200
10 40
041
031
R=22.5
015
003
021
020
045
>
45
139-27-5
015
45
005
029
0.25
219.87
009
0.81
119.87
119
87
004
0.34
119.76
82
82.97
PT 139-27-603-028
139-2
PRJ-56939
504
504
007
1.43
278.85
FOREMASTER LN
60
94 .6
1 94.60
003
1.2
9
4
034
009 010
503
006
6.07
N 2 NE 4
020
PM 91-69
032
6
36
24
22
23
13
019
121.91
002
0.24
0
4.40
84.4
18
012
12
12.42
2 .42
2 21
1 4
001
0.4
33
28
21
16
27
Rev: 05/31/2012
20
29
19
8
17
18
SEC.
PM 78-1
PM 114-95
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
364.02
002
5.67
364.02
017
001
177.98
015
1 67.89
10
800
668
200
50
20
2 5
25
10
668
2.26
1 62
6.1
12
2 0
25
. 62
USE THIS SCALE(FEET) WHEN MAP REDUCED FROM 11 X17 ORIGINAL
U.P.R.R.
BOOK
ROAD PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL BOUNDARY
CONDOMINIUM UNIT
001
SUB BOUNDARY
001
PARCEL NUMER
AIR SPACE PCL
PM/LD BOUNDARY
ACREAGE
1.00
RIGHT OF WAY PCL
ROAD EASEMENT
PARCEL SUB/SEQ NUMBER
SUB-SURFACE PCL
MATCH / LEADER LINE
PLAT RECORDING NUMBER
PB 24-45
HISTORIC LOT LINE

HISTORIC SUB BOUNDARY
BLOCK NUMBER
HISTORIC PM/LD BOUNDARY

5
LOT NUMBER
SECTION LINE
GL5
GOV. LOT NUMBER
6 8.
96
NOTES
INTERSTATE ROUTE 15
1 4 0
0
1 4
L=
2.
26
=1
35
38
50
0
5
2 2
448
50
6 3. 5
I N
TE
RST
ATE
RO
L
T E
=
L=9 U
1 .
41
NO
1 34
.81
7
8
91
100
56.31
ASSESSOR'S PARCELS - CLARK CO., NV.

Michele W. Shafe - Assessor
25
50
6.4
15
11
This map is compiled from official records, including surveys and deeds,
but only contains the information required for assessment. See the
recorded d ocuments for more detailed legal information.
5.
2.4
15
25
0
50
9.9
9
15
0
7
.2 7
15
9
60
MAP
.1 3
L=
71
No liability is assumed for the accuracy of the data d eliniated herein.
Information on road s and other non-assessed parcels may be obtained
from the Road Document Listing in the Assessor's Office.
6 1
1 5
7.
RT
6.
32
4 1
09
3 0
1 0
. 6
34
9
2
5
72
29
42
91
-9 3
HM
S
A
WY IN
ST
66
1
NO
1 2
29
7..9
9
3
43
8.4
12
5.
01
23
2
. 3
8
13
3.
.55
1
1 .3
125
1 11
.9
16
2.
LAS VEGAS BLVD NORTH
This map is for assessment use only and does NOT represent a survey.
172.72
7
72
17
175.33
110.67
110.67
125
88
.
57
.
49.17
295.62
05
5.
4.5
110
30
5
4
30
SUP-57330 - REVISED
SUP-57330 - REVISED
SUP-57330 - REVISED
SUP-57330 - REVISED
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SUP-57330

APPLICANT/OWNER: HOMELESS HELPERS
200 FOREMASTER LANE
[PRJ-56939]
SPECIAL
USE
01/06/15
PERMIT
PRJ-56939
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14
PRJ-56939
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14
PRJ-56939
SUP-57330 and SUP-57331
12/24/14

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-59062 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH OWNER: JUAN ANTONIO SERVIN-SAMPERIO - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: O (OFFICE) on 0.41 acres at 2500 West
Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-029), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58466]. Staff
C.C.: 7/15/2015
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
6. Protest Postcard - ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 [PRJ-58466]
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH - OWNER: JUAN
ANTONIO SERVIN-SAMPERIO
CASE
NUMBER
ZON-59062
SDR-59063
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
ZON-59062
** CONDITIONS **
SDR-59063 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
2.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan, date
stamped 05/11/15, except as amended by conditions herein.
3.
Safety.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08.060 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer
along a portion of the east property line where eight feet in the minimum required.
5.
An Exception from Title 19.08.030 is hereby approved, to allow no planting materials

within the west and east property line landscape buffers.
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

Conditions Page Two
6.
7.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
Public Works
8.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
9.
Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for
all driveways or other private improvements, if any, in the Charleston Boulevard public
right-of-way adjacent to this site prior to constructing any improvements within NDOT
jurisdiction.
10.
Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance with
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage patterns for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans or the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways as recommended.
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed Parking Facility with a
Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the east property line where eight
feet is the minimum required located on 0.41 acres at 2500 West Charleston Boulevard. In
addition to this application, the applicant has submitted a request for a Rezoning (ZON-59062)
from R-E (Residence Estates) to O (Office), which allows a Parking Facility as a conditional
land use. Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development
in the area, and will not have a negative impact to the adjacent commercial developments to the
east and west and residential development to the north. Therefore, staff is recommends approval
of this project with conditions.
ISSUES
x
x
Per Title 19.16.100(F) the proposed parking facility with waivers of landscaping materials
meets the definition of a Major Site Development Plan, [as it is new commercial construction
that does not comply with all applicable requirements of Title 19].
A Code Enforcement case (#144409) was processed on 08/13/14 for the lot being used as a
commercial parking lot; the case has not been resolved.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA0047-01) to amend portions of the Southeast Sector map of the General Plan
in the general vicinity of the Charleston Boulevard/Rancho Drive intersection
from SC (Service Commercial) to O (Office); from R (Rural Density
Residential) to DR (Desert Rural Density Residential); from O (Office) to
06/19/02
DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) and; from L (Low Density
Residential) to DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) in accordance with the
recommendations of the Rancho Charleston Land Use Study and Strategic
Plan. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request on
03/20/02.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA43991) to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and change the future land use
04/18/12
designation on various parcels within the redevelopment area to commercial
or mixed use. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
request on 03/13/12.
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)


05/11/11
A Code Enforcement case (#144409) was processed for the lot being used as
08/13/14
a commercial parking lot. The case has not been resolved.
Staff met with the applicant to review the submittal requirements for a
03/10/15 &
Rezoning and Site Development Plan Review for a proposed parking facility
03/23/15
with waivers of interior landscaping requirements.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff conducted a routine site visit and found the subject site is developed as a
single-family detached dwelling with high weeds and various trash and debris
located in the landscaping area adjacent to Charleston Boulevard.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.41
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single-Family
Detached
Single-Family
Detached
Planned or Special
O (Office)
DR (Desert Rural
General Office
O (Office)
Medical Office
O (Office)
East
General Office
O (Office)
West
Clinic
O (Office)
Subject Property
North
South
Master Plan Areas

C-D (Designed
Commercial)
P-R (Professional Office
and Parking)
C-D (Designed
Commercial)
C-D (Designed
Commercial)
Compliance
N/A
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)


Trails
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to 19.08.060, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Min. Setbacks
x Front
25 Feet
x Side
10 Feet
x Corner
15 Feet
15 Feet
x Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
30 %
Existing Zoning
Proposed Zoning
O (Office)
Permitted Density
One dwelling per lot
Permitted Density
N/A
Provided
100 Feet
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Units Allowed
One dwelling per lot
Units Allowed
N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.08, Town Center, the following standards apply:

Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
x North
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
5 Trees
x South
4 Trees
x East
8 Trees
8 Trees
x West
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES
25 Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
Parking Area Trees
4 Trees
end of each row of spaces
Provided
Compliance
5 Trees
4 Trees
0 Trees
0 Trees
9 Trees
Y
Y
N*
N*
N*
4 Trees
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)


Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
x North
8 Feet
x South
15 Feet
x East
8 Feet
8 Feet
x West
Provided
Compliance
Y
Y
N*
Y
Not
Wall Height
6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Not Indicated
Indicated
*The applicant has requested Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the
east property line where eight feet is required per Title 19.08.060; and an Exception to allow no
planting materials along the west and east property line.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Charleston
Boulevard
Primary Arterial
8 Feet
15 Feet
0 Feet
30 Feet
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Master Plan of Streets &

Highways
100 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
One Space
designated
as
employee
parking
Parking
N/A
0
for each
Facility
employee
on the
largest
shift
0
18
Y
0
0
17
1
Y
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

Waivers
Requirement
Request
Per Title 19.08.060 an eightfoot landscaping buffer is

required along all interior lot
lines.
landscaping buffer
along a portion of the
east property line.
Exceptions
Requirement
Per Title 19.08.030 1-24 box
tree per 20 linear feet is required
within the required landscape
buffers.
Request
To allow no planting
materials along the
west and east property
line.
Approval
Approval
ANALYSIS
This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed Parking Facility with
Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscaping buffer along a portion of the east property line where
eight feet is required located on 0.41 acres at 2500 West Charleston Boulevard. In addition to
this application, the applicant has submitted a request for a Rezoning (ZON-59062) from R-E
(Residence Estates) to O (Office). Per title 19.16.100(F) the proposed parking facility with a
Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the east property line where eight
feet is the minimum required meets the definition of a Major Site Development Plan; as this is
new commercial construction, which does not comply with all applicable requirements of Title
19.
A Parking Facility is described in Title 19.12 as: A lot or structure developed for public or
private parking as a primary use of the subject site on which it is located. This use does not
include any ancillary lot or structure provided in conjunction with a primary use in order to meet
minimum required parking standards.
Conditional Use Regulations:
1. The parking facility must be ground-level.
The submitted drawings indicate the proposed parking facility will be a ground level open air
parking lot, with no proposed structures.
2. The use of the parking facility shall cease between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., including the use
of any exterior lighting (except for security lighting).
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

The applicant has indicated that the proposed parking facility will have hours of operation from
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; which comply with listed hours of operation.
The submitted justification letter indicates that the proposed use complies with a conditional use
requirements outlined in Title 19.12. The submitted plans indicate the proposed Parking Facility
will provide 18 parking spaces, including one van accessible handicapped space.
Landscaping buffers will be provided along the north, south and west perimeter of the property,
which comply with Title 19.08 width requirements. However the applicant has requested a
Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the east perimeter adjacent to the proposed
parking area. In addition, the applicant has requested an Exception of required planting materials
along the west perimeter and east perimeter adjacent to the existing commercial developments
located to the west and east of the subject property. The submitted landscaping plan indicates
Proposis Glandulosa 24-box tree (Honey Mesquite) and combination of 5-gallon Leucophyllum
Frutescens (Texas Ranger) shrubs will be provided within the north landscaping buffer adjacent
to the existing residential use, south landscaping buffer adjacent to Charleston Boulevard and
parking lot islands.
Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development in the
area, and will not have a negative impact to the adjacent commercial developments to the east
and west and residential development to the north. Therefore, staff is recommends approval of
this project with conditions.
FINDINGS (ZON-59062)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Rezoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to O (Office) is in conformance
with the existing O (Office) designation under the Southwest Sector Plan of the General
Plan.
2.
The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
The applicant has proposed to develop the site with a Parking Facility, which is a
permitted land use within the proposed O (Office) zoning designation as a conditional
land use. The submitted justification letter indicates that the proposed use complies with
a conditional use requirements outlined in Title 19.12.
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

3.
Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The proposed O (Office) is an appropriate zoning designation, which will allow
conformance with the existing O (Office) designation under the Southwest Sector Plan of
the General Plan and surrounding medical and general office developments located
adjacent to the subject site to the east, west and south.
4.
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
Primary site access is from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial as
designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which provides adequate
capacity to serve the proposed use.
FINDINGS (SDR-59063)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;
The proposed development is compatible with surrounding development in the area, and
will not have a negative impact to the adjacent commercial developments to the east and
west and residential development to the north.
2.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other dulyadopted city plans, policies and standards;
The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along the east
perimeter adjacent to the proposed parking area. In addition, the applicant has requested an
Exception of required planting materials along the west perimeter and east perimeter
adjacent to the existing commercial developments located to the west and east of the
subject property. However, Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with
surrounding development in the area, and will not have a negative impact to the adjacent
commercial developments to the east and west and residential development to the north.
3.
Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;
JB
ZON-59062 & SDR-59063 (PRJ-58466)

Access to the site is provided from Charleston Boulevard, which is classified as 100-foot
Primary Arterial, according to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
4.
Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The primary tree species utilized for
landscaping is the Proposis Glandulosa 24-box tree (Honey Mesquite) and combination
of 5-gallon Leucophyllum Frutescens (Texas Ranger) shrubs which are consistent with the
Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.
5.
Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
There are no structure proposed with this development project, the design characteristics
of the proposed parking lot improvements are not unsightly and are compatible with
development in the area.
6.
Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
The proposed development will be subject to inspections in order to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare by City staff.
NOTICES MAILED
127
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
24
JB
ZON-59062
ZON-59062
A7
7b
A7
7bA7
77A7
A777A
777
77=
77
7
7777=
b77=
b
bAA7
A7A
A7
77
7
777
777
77A
77
7
777
775
777
75
777
b77b
b
b

777

77

777
b b
b77b
b
b
b777b
b b
b777b
b
b
b777b

777
b
b
b777b

777
b777
b

5
5
b
b
b777b
777
ZON-59062
77 77
77 7 7 777b
777 7
7 7777
77
777
b77
77A77
ZON-59062 and SDR-59063 - REVISED
AbA7b7A7Ab77777777777777777777777777777777Ab
7A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A7Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A
Ab7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7AA
AbA7b7A7Ab77777777777777777777777777777777Ab
7A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A7Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A
Ab7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7AA
AbA7b7A7Ab77777777777777777777777777777777Ab
7A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A7Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A
Ab7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7AA
AbA7b7A7Ab77777777777777777777777777777777Ab
7A77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A7Ab
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777A
Ab7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
A7AA
ZON-59062 [PRJ-58466] - REZONING RELATED TO SDR-59063 -APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH OWNER: JUAN ANTONIO SERVIN-SAMPERIO
2500 WEST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD
04/30/15
04/30/15
04/30/15
7
A
77777777777
7777'77
b77
777
b777777
777
777
7777
777777777777777
7777777777777797'
777777777777777
777777777777777
77777777777797777
7777777777797'777777A77777777
77777777777777797777777b7
77777777777797'
7777777777777b7
77777777777777
7777777777777
77777797'77797777
7A777A777777777
77777
777b7777777777777777777
7
7777777
77777777777777
77777777777777
777A

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-59063 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-59062 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DR. RUSSELL SHAH - OWNER: JUAN ANTONIO SERVINSAMPERIO - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED PARKING FACILITY WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.41 acres at 2500 West Charleston
Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-029), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: O (Office)],
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58466]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 7/15/2015
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-59063
SDR-59063

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59047 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK
PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO
SIDEWALKS, AMENITY ZONE OR GATE ON A PRIVATE STREET WHERE SUCH ARE
REQUIRED on 1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard (APN
125-36-302-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903].
Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049 [PRJ-58903]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049 [PRJ-58903]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049 [PRJ-58903]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049 [PRJ-58903]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049 [PRJ-58903]
6. Protest Postcard - VAR59047 and VAR-59048 [PRJ-58903]
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-59047
VAR-59048
WVR-59049
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to

conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
3.
building permit.
4.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
2.
3.
building permit.
4.
Public Works
5.
Construct full-width half street pavement and L-curb on Rosada Way meeting current City
Standards concurrent with on-site development activities.
6.
Construct sidewalk on Rosada Way meeting current City Standards concurrent with on-site
development activities.
7.
All existing public improvements damaged or removed by this development shall be restored
at its original location and to its original width concurrent with on-site development activities
8.
The installation of streetlights shall be deferred provided that exterior street lighting shall be
stubbed out for later use, including all necessary underground improvements including
conduit and pull boxes at each future streetlight location, and the developer shall provide to
the City such streetlights for future installation. Alternatively, monies in lieu of such deferred
streetlights, including foundations, may be contributed to the City if allowed by the
Department of Public Works. If curb and gutter is not required with this project, the required
monies in lieu of streetlights shall include the cost of conduit and pull boxes. The contributed
amount shall be based on the Citys current bond schedules for all streetlights and associated
infrastructure deferred by this action adjacent to this site.
9.
Enter into a Covenant Running with Land Agreement for the future installation of all halfstreet improvements per current City Standards for any improvements deferred through this
action. The Covenant agreement must be recorded with the County Recorder and a copy of
the recorded document must be provided to the prior to the issuance of permits.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

Public Works
1.
The installation of streetlights shall be deferred provided that exterior street lighting shall be
stubbed out for later use, including all necessary underground improvements including
conduit and pull boxes at each future streetlight location, and the developer shall provide to
the City such streetlights for future installation. Alternatively, monies in lieu of such deferred
streetlights, including foundations, may be contributed to the City if allowed by the
Department of Public Works. If curb and gutter is not required with this project, the required
monies in lieu of streetlights shall include the cost of conduit and pull boxes. The contributed
amount shall be based on the Citys current bond schedules for all streetlights and associated
infrastructure deferred by this action adjacent to this site.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting three applications: two Variances to address several deviations from
code requirements that will allow for no installation of off-site improvements and a Waiver to
allow for a reduced intersection offset and no streetlight installation. Although staff can support
the intersection off-set, the lack of streetlights and the remaining two Variance applications are
not supported. As a result, staff recommends denial of all three applications associated with this
request. If denied, all code requirements shall be met in order to develop or subdivide this parcel
for development.
ISSUES
x
x
x
A Variance (VAR-59048) is required to allow no offsite improvements on Rosada Way

where such are required. Staff does not support this request.
A Variance (VAR-59047) is required to allow no sidewalks or gate on a private street
where such are required. Staff does not support this request.
A Waiver (WVR-59049) is required to allow a 185-foot intersection offset where 220
feet is required and to install no streetlights. Staff supports the request for the intersection
offset, but does not support the lack of installing streetlights request.
The City Council approved an annexation (A-0063-64) that included the
southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard as part of a larger
Circa 1964
request.
The City Council approved Rezoning (ZON-13520) From: R-E (Residence
Estates) to: R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per Acre) on
2.56 acres at 5020 North Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and
Staff recommended approval. The action was not exercised.
07/19/06
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-13521) to allow a Residential
Planned Development on 2.56 acres where a minimum of 5.00 acres is
required at 5020 North Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff
recommended approval. The action was not exercised.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)


The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-13523) to allow approximately
194 feet between street intersections where 220 feet is the minimum distance
separation required on 2.56 acres at 5020 North Jones Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval. The action was not
exercised.
for a proposed four-lot Single-Family Residential Development on 2.56 acres
at 5020 North Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff
recommended approval. The action was not exercised.
The City Council approved a Tentative Map (TMP-14696) for a proposed
four-lot Single-Family Residential Development on 2.56 acres at 5020 North
08/24/06
Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval. The Final Map was not recorded.
A Final Map (FMP-19344) was processed for a proposed four-lot Single01/23/07
Family Residential Development on 2.56 acres at 5020 North Jones
Boulevard, but was not recorded.
A Parcel Map (PMP-57754) for a proposed four-lot Single-Family Residential
Development on 2.56 acres at 5020 North Jones Boulevard was applied for.
01/28/15
The application is on hold pending approval of VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and
WVR-59049.

10/20/14

A building permit (#92143) for grading at 5020 North Jones Boulevard. The
07/06/07
permit was not finalized.
Staff met with the applicant regarding a four-lot residential project on the
southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard. The applicant is
requesting to not install offsite improvements or develop a private street to
04/15/15
code standards. This project was previously approved with all offsite
requirements intact, but has since expired.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

Field Check
04/30/15
Staff visited the site and found a vacant parcel. There was evidence to
indicate that grading had taken place, but not recently.

Site Area
Net Acres
1.93
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
Single-Family,
Detached
Animal Hospital,
Clinic, or Shelter
(With no Outside
Pens)
Single-Family,
Detached
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R (Rural Density
Residential)


R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District 175 Feet
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Jones Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Rosada Way
Jones Boulevard
Rosada Way
Minor Local
Collector
Governing Document
Compliance
with Street
Section
106
60
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Required
To install curb, gutter, streetlights, a
five-foot wide sidewalk and a threefoot wide amenity area.
To install curb, gutter, streetlights, a
five-foot wide sidewalk and a fivefoot wide amenity area.
Waivers
Requirement
To provide a 220-foot distance
separation between intersections
when providing external access to an
existing or planned ROW of 60 feet
or greater per Title 19.02.140.
To install streetlights on Jones
Boulevard, Rosada Way and an
unnamed Private Street.
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Provided
To provide none of
the requirements.
To provide none of
the requirements.
Request
To allow a 185-foot offset from
the intersections of Rosada Way
and the proposed Private Street.
To install no streetlights.
Compliance
Approval
Denial
ANALYSIS
The applicant has submitted two Variances and a Waiver request needed for approval of a fourlot residential subdivision. The first Variance (VAR-59047) seeks relief from installing
sidewalks and a gate for a proposed private street. The applicant states in the justification letter
that the parcel is virtually undevelopable if a gate is required. The lack of sidewalks on a private
street is not addressed and no justification was provided. Staff does not support this request.
The second Variance (VAR-59048) seeks relief from the requirement of installing offsite (curb,
gutter, streetlights, sidewalks and amenity area) improvements along Rosada Way and no
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

amenity area along Jones Boulevard. The applicant states in the justification letter; Since this is
a 4 lot residential subdivision, street lights on Jones provide too much night light for residential
comfort. The Variance for no landscape on Jones is in accordance with other residential
developments in the area. Rosada Way is semi-rural and should remain so. Staff does not
concur with this assessment of the area.
In addition, the applicant requests Waivers (WVR-59049) to allow an intersection offset to be
less than the required 220 feet. Public Works staff supports this request, but has indicated that
future traffic increases may require mitigation measures. Staff supports this request. Another
Waiver under this same case is to allow no installation of streetlights. The applicant states that
there would be too much light on the residences if they were required to install the streetlights.
However, staff does not support this position. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of all
three applications.
The Clark County School District projects that two primary and secondary school students will
be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the three schools serving the area
(May Elementary School, Lied Middle School and Shadow Ridge High School), The District
notes that only Lied was not over capacity for the 2014-15 school year and no additional schools
are planned. It was noted that May Elementary School was 16.44% over capacity.
In conclusion, a four-lot single-family residential subdivision is an appropriate use for the parcel
when developed to City of Las Vegas development standards. The applicant is requesting
deviations from the City of Las Vegas development standards as evidenced by the two Variances
and Waiver requests. All but one of these requests is not supported by staff. As a result, staff
recommends denial of all applications as submitted for the project.
1.
2.
3.


YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

resolution.
No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to not install a gate, sidewalks or streetlights
on a private street. An alternative is to install these requirements that would allow conformance
to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to not install the required offsite improvements
adjacent to their proposed development. An alternative is to install the offsite improvements that
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.
YK
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 & WVR-59049 (PRJ-58903)

Public Works has no immediate concerns with the requested Waiver of intersection offset
distance; however it is possible that traffic patterns in the future might require the limitation of
vehicular movements at the subject intersection to ensure safe operation.
25
NOTICES MAILED
90 - VAR-59047 and VAR-59048

90 - WVR-59049
APPROVALS
0 - VAR-59047 and VAR-59048

0 - WVR-59049
PROTESTS
1 - VAR-59047 and VAR-59048

1 - WVR-59049
YK
A 7 676 A b A 7
b 7
VAR-59047
77 7
7 777 7 7777
7 77
7 7 7A 7 b 77
77A 7
77777- 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
77777 77 7b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7

77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777 777
b 7

77 7
77 77
A 7
77b 7
777
7 A
7 7 77
A @7 @77b -b
7 77 77
A - 7767
A 76
A b A 77 76
77
7A 7
7
7 777
A 7 7 7
7 77 77
A 77
A 7
77
7A 7
b 7 76
A 777
77
A 7
7 77
7 7777
7
7 77
A 777
77
A 777 777
7
7A
A 7 7 7@7 b 7677
7 77
7
7A
7 7
77777
77 7777777
7 @7 7 7777777777 77 77 77
7 77 77 -77 7 77 77 77
7 7
6 7 A 7 7
77 7777
7 7
b 7
A 7 @
VAR-59047
77 77
76
7
7
7 777
7
7 A
-7 77 77
A 7 @777b
7 7 7 -7
77 777 7 77
7 7 77@ 7 7
7 777 7
777
b A 7 -
A 776
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049
School Development Tracking Form
Real Property Management

4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89121
http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Date Filed 05/01/2015
Application Number PRJ-58903
Entity
LV
Company Name Equity Link Properties

Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City
Phone
State
Mobile
Project Name
Zip Code
Fax
Email
Rosada & Jones
Project Description Rosada & Jones
APN's
125-36-302-001
Student Yield
Elementary School
4
Single-Family Units (1)

Multi-Family Units (2)
Middle School
High School
x 0.195 =
x 0.102 =
x 0.135 =
x 0.135 =
x 0.056 =
x 0.062 =
Resort Condo Units (3)

Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Schools Serving the Area*
Name
Address
Grade
Capacity
Enrollment
Site Date
May ES
6350 W. Washburn Rd
K-5
578
667
03/20/15
Lied MS
5350 W. Tropical Pkwy
6-8
1614
1125
03/20/15
Shadow Ridge HS
5050 Brent Lane
9-12
2609
2700
03/20/15
* CCSD Comments May ES and Shadow Ridge HS are over capacity for the 2014-15 school year. May ES is 16.44% over
capacity. Shadow Ridge HS is 3.60% over capacity.
Approved
Disapproved
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049
VAR-59047 [PRJ-58903] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59048 AND WVR-59049 -APPLICANT/OWNER:

EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROSADA WAY AND JONES BOULEVARD
04/30/15

04/30/15

04/30/15

7 7
b77A 7A 7A
A 7 7
b 77 7 bA7
7
7
77Ab7A77 b77 AA77
7
A7A 7 7
7
7777777777b7
A7777
7
7777 777777777
7 7777777777777777
777 77777777 77
777777777777
b77777
7
77777777777777
77777
7
7777777777
777 77A77777777
AAb77
7
777= 77777777777
7 77777777777
=7
=
77 7777777 777
77
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049
AAb77
7
77777 77777777
7777 77 7777777
77777777777 77
77777777777
777
7
7777777 777777
77 77777777777
77
A77
7
7777777 7777777
7777777777777
777777777777
777777 777 777
77777 7777777777
777777
VAR-59047, VAR-59048 and WVR-59049

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59048 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59047 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Variance TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE ON JONES BOULEVARD AND TO
ALLOW NO OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ON ROSADA WAY WHERE SUCH ARE
REQUIRED on 1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard (APN
125-36-302-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903].
Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 676 A b A 7
b 7
VAR-59048
77 7
7 777 7 7777
7 77
7 7 7A 7 b 77
77A 7
77777- 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
77777 77 7b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7

77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777 777
b 7

77 7
77 77
A 7
77b 7
777
7 A
7 7 77
A @7 @77b -b
7 77 77
A - 7767
A 76
A b A 77 76
77
7A 7
7
7 777
A 7 7 7
7 77 77
A 77
A 7
77
7A 7
b 7 76
A 777
77
A 7
7 77
7 7777
7
7 77
A 777
77
A 777 777
7
7A
A 7 7 7@7 b 7677
7 77
7
7A
7 7
77777
77 7777777
7 @7 7 7777777777 77 77 77
7 77 77 -77 7 77 77 77
7 7
6 7 A 7 7
77 7777
7 7
b 7
A 7 @
VAR-59048
77 77
76
7
7
7 777
7
7 A
-7 77 77
A 7 @777b
7 7 7 -7
77 777 7 77
7 7 77@ 7 7
7 777 7
777
b A 7 -
A 776

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-59049 - WAIVER RELATED TO VAR-59047 AND VAR-59048 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: EQUITYLINK PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS ON JONES BOULEVARD, ROSADA WAY
AND A PROPOSED PRIVATE STREET WHERE STREETLIGHTS ARE REQUIRED AND
TO ALLOW A 166-FOOT INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS REQUIRED on
1.93 acres on the southeast corner of Rosada Way and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-36-302-001),
R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcard

paper use, backup
A 7 676 A b A 7
b 7
WVR-59049
77 7
7 777 7 7777
7 77
7 7 7A 7 b 77
77A 7
77777- 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
77777 77 7b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7

77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777 777
b 7

77 7
77 77
A 7
77b 7
777
7 A
7 7 77
A @7 @77b -b
7 77 77
A - 7767
A 76
A b A 77 76
77
7A 7
7
7 777
A 7 7 7
7 77 77
A 77
A 7
77
7A 7
b 7 76
A 777
77
A 7
7 77
7 7777
7
7 77
A 777
77
A 777 777
7
7A
A 7 7 7@7 b 7677
7 77
7
7A
7 7
77777
77 7777777
7 @7 7 7777777777 77 77 77
7 77 77 -77 7 77 77 77
7 7
6 7 A 7 7
77 7777
7 7
b 7
A 7 @
WVR-59049
77 77
76
7
7
7 777
7
7 A
-7 77 77
A 7 @777b
7 7 7 -7
77 777 7 77
7 7 77@ 7 7
7 777 7
777
b A 7 -
A 776

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59050 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR
HECKER, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN 11-FOOT
CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on 0.83 acres at the
southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-23-502-008), R-E (Residence
Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58468]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
6. Protest Postcard - VAR-59050 and SDR-59051 [PRJ-58468]
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR HECKER, ET AL
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-59050
SDR-59051
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
VAR-59050
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-59051) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the conditions of approval for Variance (VAR-59050).
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, date stamped
04/23/15, except as amended by conditions herein.
4.
Conformance to all conditions of approval of Variance (VAR-53671), Special Use Permit

(SUP-53496) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-53497), except as amended herein.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device.
8.
9.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
Public Works
10.
Dedicate an additional five feet of right-of-way, where such does not exist, on Elkhorn
Road prior to approval of construction drawings for this site.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

11.
Construct all incomplete half-street improvements including appropriate transitional

paving (if legally able) on Elkhorn Road adjacent to this site concurrent with
development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development
shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with
development of this site. Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical,
telephone, etc., located within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior
to construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete). The entrance on Elkhorn Road is
a right in, right out driveway only.
12.
Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to
discuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of construction drawings for
this site.
13.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the Las Vegas Bike Lanes project and any other public improvement
projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
14.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
15.
Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance
with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage patterns for this site prior to
submittal of construction plans or the issuance of any building or grading permits,
whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to revise a previously approved 24-bed Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home on the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard on an R-E
(Residence Estates) zoned parcel. This request is the result of a survey that revealed a wider
right-of-way along the portion of Jones Boulevard that abuts this parcel on the east. A Variance
to reduce the corner side yard setback is now required along with a Waiver for a reduced
landscape buffer width. The parcel is currently undeveloped and the proposed revisions conform
to all City of Las Vegas code requirements aside from the Variance and the landscape buffer
Waiver, that staff supports. The project will remain an appropriate buffer between the two
primary arterial streets and the adjacent residential properties to the west and south. For these
reasons, staff recommends approval. If denied, no building permits or business license could be
issued for a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home use on the site.
ISSUES
x
x
A Variance is required to allow an 11-foot corner yard setback where 15 feet is required
for an approved Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home. Staff supports this request as
the right-of-way width was larger than City of Las Vegas records indicated.
A Waiver is required to allow no perimeter landscape buffer along portions of the east
perimeter as a result of the wider right-of-way. Staff supports this request.
The City Council approved the request to Annex (ANX-27333) 0.83 acres
located at the southwest corner of Jones Boulevard and Elkhorn Road. The
06/18/08
effective date was 07/16/08.
The Planning Commission approved a motion to Table a request to amend the
land use (GPA-32557) from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to SC
(Service Commercial), a Rezoning (ZON-32556) from U (Undeveloped) to C1 (Limited Commercial), a Variance (VAR-32575) to allow a 12-foot rear
yard setback where 20 feet is required, a Variance (VAR-32570) to allow 28
02/12/09
parking spaces where 40 is required and no loading zone, and a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-32569) for a proposed 7,000 square-foot
convenience store with multiple landscape waivers. Staff recommended
denial.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)


The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-50461) from U (Undeveloped)
[Dr (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plan designation] to R-E
10/16/13
(Residential Estates) on 0.83 acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road
and Jones Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-53671) to allow a 10foot Residential Adjacency Setback where 60 feet is required for a proposed
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing home on 0.83 acres at the southwest
corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-53496) For a
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home at the southwest corner of Elkhorn
06/10/14
Road and Jones Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR53497) for a 24-bed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home on 0.83 acres
at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard. Staff

06/05/09

No related permits or business licenses are on file.
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a Variance and
03/23/15
Site Development Plan Review needed to allow for a wider right-of-way on
Jones Boulevard than records initially indicated.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff visited the site and found a make-shift tent with two men selling palm
hats. There were weeds and signs on the site.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)


Site Area
Net Acres
0.83
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
North
Single-Family,
Detached
South
Single-Family,
Detached
East
Undeveloped
West
Single-Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural
RN (Rural
Neighborhood) Clark
County
R (Rural Density
Residential)
RN (Rural
Neighborhood) Clark
County

R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District) Clark
County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District) Clark
County
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.06.060, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
20,000 SF
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Min. Setbacks
50 Feet
x Front
Provided
36,155 SF
130 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
75 Feet
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

Standard
x Side
x Corner
x Rear
Trash Enclosure
Mech. Equipment
Min. Lot Size
Min. Lot Width
Required/Allowed
10 Feet
15 Feet
35 Feet
35 Feet
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Roof or Trellis
Screened
20,000 SF
100 Feet
Residential Adjacency Standards

3:1 proximity slope
Adjacent development matching setback
Trash Enclosure
Provided
10 Feet
15 Feet
35. Feet
20 Feet
Screened, Gated,
w/ a Roof or
Trellis by
condition
Screened
36,155 SF
130 Feet
Required/Allowed
60 Feet
N/A
50 Feet
Provided
10 Feet
N/A
81 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Compliance
N
N/A
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:

Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
x North
2 Trees
2 Trees
x South
16 Trees
7 Trees
x East
17 Trees
14 Trees
17 Trees
14 Trees
x West
37 Trees
52 Trees
Parking Area Trees
7 Trees
1 Trees
Min. Zone Width
x North
6 Feet
6 Feet
x South
0 Feet
6 Feet
x East
6 Feet
11 Feet
0 Feet
6 Feet
x West
Wall Height
Not Indicated
*Approved via an Exception under SDR-53497
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N*
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

Elkhorn Road
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Primary Arterial
Jones Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Street Name
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways
Planned Streets and
Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
100
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
105
Parking Requirement
Gross
Required
Provided
Compliance
Floor
Parking
Parking
Use
Area or
Parking Ratio
HandiHandiNumber
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
of Units
One space for
each 6 beds,
plus one space
for each
Convalescent
employee on
Care
24-Beds
14
the largest shift,
Facility/Nursi
plus 3 spaces
ng Home
for use by
medical
professionals.
14
14
Y
13
1
12
2
Y
Waivers
Requirement
To install a 15-foot wide
perimeter landscape buffer
adjacent to a right-of-way.
Request
To allow a zero to an 11-foot wide
perimeter landscape buffer
adjacent to Jones Boulevard rightof-way.
Approval
ANALYSIS
The applicant has submitted these applications as a result of a mapping error on City of Las
Vegas maps. The error was discovered by a private survey firm preparing the site for a
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

previously approved Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home use. These applications will
allow the previously approve project to be developed as planned with the greater Jones
Boulevard right-of-way.
Specifically, the right-of-way width precipitates the need for a Variance to reduce the east corner
side yard setback by five feet, which will result in the need to allow a building to have an 11-foot
wide setback where 15 feet is required. Furthermore, the right-of-way width requires the Site
Development Plan Review to be amended as it results in the need for a reduced perimeter
landscape buffer Waiver. Although the bus turnout is exempted from the landscape buffer
requirement, the Waiver would allow a zero to an 11-foot wide corner perimeter landscape
buffer, where 15-foot is required along other sections of the east perimeter. Although this is an
R-E (Residence Estates) zoned residential parcel, commercial development standards apply for
commercial-like developments such as a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home.
Except for the adjustments required for the greater Jones Boulevard right-of-way, the project
remains to be developed as previously approved. As a result, all conditions of approvals for the
applications approved by City Council on 06/10/14 will remain, except as modified by these
applications. Since this project is essentially the same project as previously approved and the
adjustments being considered with these requests do not change the overall nature of the project
or its effect on the adjacent residential properties, staff recommends approval, with conditions.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

Evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant has
created a self-imposed hardship by as the project was developed in good faith according to
official City records and maps. The project would fail if required to conformance to the Title 19
requirements at this time. In view of the inaccurate records and maps, the hardship created was
not preferential in nature, and it is thereby within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.
In order to approve a Site Development Plan application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the Planning
Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.

The development is an appropriate buffer for the residential properties to the south and
west and the primary arterial roads to the north and east. The lush landscaping provided
will further protect the adjacent residential properties from the project. The project is
compatible with the residential nature of the area.
2.
Aside from the Variance and Waiver, this project meets all code requirements for a
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home use. The Variance is required due to the nonconforming corner side yard setback created as a result of the increased width of Jones
Boulevard right-of-way. The associated Waiver is also a result of this condition. Staff
supports these requests.
3.

The project is accessed from Elkhorn Road, a 100-foot Primary Arterial with sufficient
capacity for the traffic needs of the proposed use.
4.
The building and landscape materials are commonly found in this area of the City and are
appropriate for the area.
YK
VAR-59050 & SDR-59051 (PRJ-58468)

5.

The building has a low visible impact on the site as it is only a single-story structure. It
has the aesthetic of a contemporary architectural theme that is aesthetically pleasing
and harmonious with the other residential buildings in the area and will be an
appropriate buffer between two primary arterial streets and the residential properties to
the south and west.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed development is subject to regular City inspections for building and
licensing and will therefore not compromise the public health, safety, and welfare.
NOTICES MAILED
92
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
23
YK
VAR-59050
VAR-59050
VAR-59050 and SDR-59051
VAR-59050 and SDR-59051
VAR-59050 and SDR-59051
VAR-59050 and SDR-59051
VAR-59050 [PRJ-58468] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-59051 -APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR HECKER,

ET AL
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND JONES BOULEVARD
04/30/15
VAR-59050 [PRJ-58468] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-59051 -APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR HECKER,

ET AL
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND JONES BOULEVARD
04/30/15
VAR-59050 and SDR-59051

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-59051 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-59050 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: VICTOR HECKER, ET AL - For possible action on a
request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR53497) FOR A 24-BED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT TO 11-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE
EAST PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.83 acres at the southwest corner of
Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APN 125-23-502-008), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone,
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58468]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-59051
SDR-59051

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59053 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST
SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE SUCH
ARE REQUIRED on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-008), M (Industrial)
Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58589]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-59053 and ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-59053 and ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-59053 and ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-59053 and ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE
WORLDWIDE, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
VAR-59053
ROC-59056

conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval of Review of Condition

(ROC-59056) shall be required, if approved.
2.
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Chapter 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed
for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3.
compliance with LVMC Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building
and Safety.
4.
5.
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

Conditions Page Two
Public Works
6.
Sign a Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible future installation of halfstreet improvements per City Standards (including curb and gutter, sidewalks, permanent
paving and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Balsam Street adjacent to this site. The
Covenant agreement must be recorded with the County Recorder and a copy of the
recorded document must be provided to the prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for this site.
ROC-59056 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to the conditions of approval for Site Development Plan Review (SDR50483), except as amended herein.
Public Works
2.
Condition #14 of SDR-50483 shall be replaced with the following condition: Sign a
Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible future installation of half-street
improvements per City Standards (including curb and gutter, sidewalks, permanent paving
and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Balsam Street adjacent to this site. The
3.
Condition of Approval #17 shall be revised to read: Prior to the issuance of any permits for
this site, meet with the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) to determine the limits of
asphalt and parking for the area over the Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS). This
area shall be posted No Parking as long as the ISDS is still operating. If this site cannot
meet SNHD requirements for the existing commercial ISDS permit, this site shall connect
to public sewer in Red Coach Avenue and abandon the Individual Sewage Disposal System
(ISDS) according to SNHD regulations prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for this site.
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow no sidewalk, curb and gutter, where these
improvements are required and a companion Review of Condition of a previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-50483) to delete Condition #14 which states, Construct all
incomplete half-street improvements adjacent to this site, and remove all existing substandard
street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to this site and replace with new
improvements meeting current City Standards within two years from the date of this approval.
In addition Condition #17 is requested for deletion and states, This site shall connect to public
sewer in Red Coach Avenue and abandon the Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS)
according to SNHD regulations prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this site at
4505 Balsam Street. If these applications are denied the applicant must bring the subject site in
compliance with Conditions #14 and #17 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50483) to
obtain a Certificate of Occupancy.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-23635) approximately
0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street. The Planning Commission and The
Department of Planning staff recommended approval. The annexation
12/19/07
became effective 12/28/07 and the zoning district was established as R-E
(Residence Estates).
A code enforcement case (63536) was processed for running a construction
03/18/08
company out of a residence at 4505 Balsam Street. The case was resolved on
03/21/08.
08/20/08
recommended denial.
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

08/20/08
08/20/10.
02/17/09
06/11/09
09/19/11
A code enforcement case (109296) was processed for semi-trucks and
construction equipment parked on the street at 4505 Balsam Street. The case
01/11/12
10/24/12
The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-50574) to allow
existing outside storage within the north side yard setback and landscape
buffer areas on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street. The Department of
Planning staff recommended denial.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR50483) for the conversion of an existing 2,092 square-foot single family
09/10/13
residence to a Contractor's Plant, Shop and Storage Yard office with Waivers
of perimeter landscape buffer standards to allow zero-foot buffers along the
south and a portion of the north property lines where eight feet is required and
a zero-foot buffer along the east property line where 15 feet is required on
0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street. The Department of Planning staff
recommended denial.
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]


02/27/12

c.1966
04/03/08
A business license (B20-02054) was issued for a Business Support Service at
03/21/12
4505 Balsam Street. The license remains active at this location.
06/09/14
permits have been issued, as no civil improvement plans have been submitted
or approved.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants representative and
the submittal requirements for a Variance and Review of Condition to delete
03/31/15
conditions #14 and #17 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50483) were
discussed.
Field Check
04/28/15
Plant, Shop and Storage Yard with no completed half-street improvements.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.62
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

Surrounding
Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
Mini-Storage
Facility
Private School,
Primary
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Park)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ANALYSIS
4505 Balsam Street. The applicant stated in their justification letter that installing the
improvements is cost prohibitive for the small business owner, who thought that she had
purchased an operational property. The applicant has an ongoing code enforcement case related
to the noncompliance of Condition #14 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-50483), which
required the construction of half-street improvements adjacent to this site.
JG
VAR-59053 & ROC-59056 [PRJ-58589]

When a site is developed in the City of Las Vegas, it is customary to require the
installation of all incomplete or damaged improvements surrounding the site so they
match what exists in the surrounding area.
The City of Las Vegas Public Works Department has been in correspondence with the
Southern Nevada Health District regarding the Individual Sewage Disposal System
(ISDS) and found that the existing ISDS is commercial and this site can continue to use
it until it fails. However, per the guidelines for an ISDS, asphalt is prohibited over the
ISDS and therefore, the parking for this site may be impacted.
Although half street improvements are scarce in this area, the City is currently working on
building complete streets throughout the City. The mini-storage site to the south was
required to construct half street improvements adjacent to its site several years ago and
Somerset Academy is currently constructing half street improvements directly across the
street from this site. These previous projects have set the precedent for requiring complete
half street improvements adjacent to this site. Therefore, Public Works recommends denial
of this portion of the application.
FINDINGS
The subject Contractors Plant, Shop and Storage Yard was approved by the Planning Commission
on September 10, 2013. The proposed Variance and removal of Conditions #14 and #17 are not
appropriate as the applicants representatives agreed to the conditions of approval of Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-50483). Therefore, staff recommends denial of these requests.
NOTICES MAILED
138
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
26
JG
VAR-59053
VAR-59053
b 7 7 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b
A 7 ' 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 b 7 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7
A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A b 7b A 7A
b 7 7 7 A 77A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7A 7 b 7 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
A 7
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 ' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
b 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7' 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 7 A 7 7 7' 7 b 7A 7 A 7
7' 7 7 ' 7A 7A 7 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 b
7 7 A A 7 A 7 b 7 ' ' 7 7 A 7 7
7A 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7 7 '
A b 7 7 7' 7 b 7 7 7A 7 7A 7' 7 7
7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 ' 7 77 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A
' 7 b 7 7' 7A 7 b 7 ' 7 A b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7A b
b 7 A A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7
A 7 7A 7 7 b 7A 7 b A 7 7 7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7' 7b 7 7b A 7b 7'
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 '
7' 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 ' 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7
A7 b
bb
Ab
7 7 7 b
A 7A A
Ab
b A 7' b
7 7b b
A 7b A
b A
A 7b A
b7

Ab
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 b
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
b 7A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056
7A b
7 7
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
A
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
7 ' ' b
7 7b b
7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A 7
A 7b A
AA
7A 7 A
7 A 7
7 A A 7
' 7 A
A A 7
b 7 A 7 b 7 7
7 A 7 b 7 7
A 7b 7
A 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
A b 7
A 7
7 b 7 A
7b

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
7 A A 7
A 7' 7
7 7 b
'
A

7
A
7
7b A b 7A
A b A 7 A
7
A
7 b A 7 b
7 b A 7 b
b
A 7 A 7 A A 7

bb
A 7
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056

b
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
A
7 A 7
' 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
A
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
7 7 b
7 A A 7
7 7 A 7
7 7b b
7 A 7
A
7A 7 A

7 A 7 b
7 7b A 7
7A 7 A
A
7 A 7 b
7 7b A 7
7A 7 A
' ' b
b
A
' ' b
' ' b
' ' b
b 7A A
b'b
7A 7 A
Ab
7 A
A A 7
A 7A A
7 A

Ab
7 ' ' b
7 7b b
A 7b A
Ab
7
b A
A 7b A
bb
7
A 7b A
7 7 7 b
' A b
7
b A 7' b
b A
b 7 7 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b
A 7 ' 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 b 7 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7
A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A b 7b A 7A
b 7 7 7 A 77A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7A 7 b 7 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
A 7
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 ' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
b 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7' 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 7 A 7 7 7' 7 b 7A 7 A 7
7' 7 7 ' 7A 7A 7 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 b
7 7 A A 7 A 7 b 7 ' ' 7 7 A 7 7
7A 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7 7 '
A b 7 7 7' 7 b 7 7 7A 7 7A 7' 7 7
7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 ' 7 77 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A
' 7 b 7 7' 7A 7 b 7 ' 7 A b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7A b
b 7 A A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7
A 7 7A 7 7 b 7A 7 b A 7 7 7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7' 7b 7 7b A 7b 7'
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 '
7' 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 7 b
b A 7' b
A 7A A
Ab
A 7b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7b
7 b 7 A
A b A 7A A
7A A
A A 7 A b
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
A b 7
A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
b 7A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056
7A b
7 7
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
b7

Ab

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
7 7b A 7
7 ' ' b
b7A
b A 7
7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
' 7 A
7 A 7
7
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 A 7
7 7b b
A 7b A
b A
A 7b A
AA
Ab
7 A A 7
bb
7 7 ' 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7
A7 b
7 A A 7 7
7 7b b
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A A 7
A 7
7 A A 7
A 7' 7
7 7 b
'
A

7
7b A b 7A
A b A 7 A
7
A
7 b A 7 b
7 b A 7 b
b
A
7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

bb
A 7
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
b 7 7 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b
A 7 ' 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 b 7 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7
A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A b 7b A 7A
b 7 7 7 A 77A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7A 7 b 7 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
A 7
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 ' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
b 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7' 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 7 A 7 7 7' 7 b 7A 7 A 7
7' 7 7 ' 7A 7A 7 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 b
7 7 A A 7 A 7 b 7 ' ' 7 7 A 7 7
7A 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7 7 '
A b 7 7 7' 7 b 7 7 7A 7 7A 7' 7 7
7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 ' 7 77 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A
' 7 b 7 7' 7A 7 b 7 ' 7 A b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7A b
b 7 A A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7
A 7 7A 7 7 b 7A 7 b A 7 7 7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7' 7b 7 7b A 7b 7'
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 '
7' 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 ' 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7
A7 b
bb
Ab
b7

Ab
7 7 A 7
7 A
7A 7 A
7A b
7 7
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
b 7A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7 7 b
7 A A 7
7 ' ' b
A
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
7 A 7
7 7b b
7A 7 A
7 A 7
7 7b b
A 7b A
b A
A 7b A
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056
7 7 7 b
A 7A A
Ab
b A 7' b
A 7b A
AA
7A 7 A
7 A 7
7 A A 7
' 7 A
A A 7
b 7 A 7 b 7 7
7 A 7 b 7 7
A 7b 7
A 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
A b 7
A 7
7 b 7 A
7b

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
7 A A 7
A 7' 7
7 7 b
'
A

7
A
7
7b A b 7A
A b A 7 A
7
A
7 b A 7 b
7 b A 7 b
b
A 7 A 7 A A 7

bb
A 7
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
b 7 7 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b
A 7 ' 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 b 7 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7
A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A b 7b A 7A
b 7 7 7 A 77A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7A 7 b 7 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
A 7
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 ' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
b 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7' 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 7 A 7 7 7' 7 b 7A 7 A 7
7' 7 7 ' 7A 7A 7 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 b
7 7 A A 7 A 7 b 7 ' ' 7 7 A 7 7
7A 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7 7 '
A b 7 7 7' 7 b 7 7 7A 7 7A 7' 7 7
7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 ' 7 77 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A
' 7 b 7 7' 7A 7 b 7 ' 7 A b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7A b
b 7 A A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7
A 7 7A 7 7 b 7A 7 b A 7 7 7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7' 7b 7 7b A 7b 7'
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 '
7' 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 ' 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7
A7 b
bb
7 7 7 b
A 7A A
Ab
b A 7' b
b7

Ab
7 7 A 7
7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
b 7A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056
7A b
7 7
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7 ' ' b
7 7b b
7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A 7
7 7b b
A 7b A
b A
A 7b A
7A 7 A
Ab
7 A 7
7 A A 7
' 7 A
A 7b A
AA
A 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
A b 7
A 7
7 b 7 A
7b

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
7 A A 7
A 7' 7
7 7 b
'
A

7
A
7
7b A b 7A
A A 7
A b A 7 A
7
A
7 b A 7 b
7 b A 7 b
b
A 7 A 7 A A 7

bb
A 7
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
bb
b 7 7 7b A 7b 7 A A 7 b
A 7 ' 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 b 7 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7
A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A b 7b A 7A
b 7 7 7 A 77A 7 A 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7
A 7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7A 7 b 7 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
A 7
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 ' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 A 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7 7 7 7b 7 ' 7 A
b 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A
b 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
7 7A 7 A b 7 ' 7 7' 7' 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 7 A 7 7 7' 7 b 7A 7 A 7
7' 7 7 ' 7A 7A 7 7A 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 b
7 7 A A 7 A 7 b 7 ' ' 7 7 A 7 7
7A 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 ' 7 A 7 7 '
A b 7 7 7' 7 b 7 7 7A 7 7A 7' 7 7
7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 A
7 ' 7 77 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A
' 7 b 7 7' 7A 7 b 7 ' 7 A b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7A b
b 7 A A 7 7 7A 7 b 7 7
A 7 7A 7 7 b 7A 7 b A 7 7 7
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7' 7b 7 7b A 7b 7'
b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7
' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 '
7' 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7 7
7 7 ' 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7' 7 7
A7 b
A 7A A
7 7 7 b
b A 7' b
Ab
Ab
A 7b A
7b
7 b 7 A
A b A 7A A
7A A
A A 7 A b
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
A b 7
A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
VAR-59053 and ROC-59056
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 7b A 7
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7 7 A 7
7 A
Ab

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7 A 7 b
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
7 7b A 7
7 ' ' b
b7A
b A 7
7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
' 7 A
7 A 7
7
7A 7 A
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 A 7
7 7b b
A 7b A
b A
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 A A 7 7
7 7b b
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A A 7
A 7
7 A A 7
A 7' 7
7 7 b
'
A

7
7b A b 7A
A b A 7 A
7
A
7 b A 7 b
7 b A 7 b
b
A
7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

bb
A 7
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
VAR-59053 [PRJ-58589] - VARIANCE RELATED TO ROC-59056

SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC
4505 BALSAM STREET
-APPLICANT:
04/28/15
SOUTHWEST
VAR-59053 [PRJ-58589] - VARIANCE RELATED TO ROC-59056

SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE, LLC
4505 BALSAM STREET
-APPLICANT:
04/28/15
SOUTHWEST
VAR-59053

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ROC-59056 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59053 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER: PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of an approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-50483) TO DELETE CONDITION #14 WHICH STATES,
"CONSTRUCT ALL INCOMPLETE HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO
THIS SITE, AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING SUBSTANDARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS
AND UNUSED DRIVEWAY CUTS ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AND REPLACE WITH
NEW IMPROVEMENTS MEETING CURRENT CITY STANDARDS WITHIN TWO YEARS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS APPROVAL" AND TO DELETE CONDITION #17 WHICH
STATES, "THIS SITE SHALL CONNECT TO PUBLIC SEWER IN RED COACH AVENUE
AND ABANDON THE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (ISDS) ACCORDING
TO SNHD REGULATIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY FOR THIS SITE" on 0.62 acres at 4505 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-008),
M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58589]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Back up
4. Action Letter for SDR-50483 [PRJ-50428]

paper use, backup
ROC-59056
ROC-59056
ROC-59056
ROC-59056
ROC-59056
ROC-59056

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59057 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE SUCH
ARE REQUIRED on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street (APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial)
Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-59057 and ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-59057 and ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-59057 and ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-59057 and ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME
LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
VAR-59057
ROC-58058

conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval of Review of Condition

(ROC-59058) shall be required, if approved.
2.
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Chapter 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed
for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3.
compliance with LVMC Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building
and Safety.
4.
5.
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]

Conditions Page Two
Public Works
6.
paving and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Balsam Street adjacent to this site. The
ROC-59058 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to the Conditions of Approval of Site Development Plan Review (SDR48826), except as amended herein.
Public Works
2.
Condition #13 of SDR-48826 shall be replaced with the following condition: Sign a
Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible future installation of half-street
improvements per City Standards (including curb and gutter, sidewalks, permanent paving
and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Balsam Street adjacent to this site. The
3.
Condition of Approval #16 shall be revised to read: Prior to the issuance of any permits for
this site, meet with the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) to determine if an
upgrade of the existing residential Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) is allowed
and also to determine the limits of asphalt and parking for the area over the ISDS. This
area shall be posted No Parking as long as the ISDS is still operating. If this site cannot
meet SNHD requirements for a commercial ISDS permit, this site shall connect to public
according to SNHD regulations prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this
site.
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4515 Balsam Street. If these applications are denied the applicant must bring the subject site in
compliance with Conditions #13 and #16 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) to
obtain a Certificate of Occupancy.
The City Council approved an Annexation (ANX-23639) for a petition to
Annex property at 4515 Balsam Street, containing approximately 0.61 acres.
12/19/07
The Planning Commission and the Department of Planning staff
recommended approval of the request. The effective date of the Annexation
was 12/28/07.
02/27/08
out of an existing residence at 4515 Balsam Street. The case was resolved on
09/04/08.
08/20/08
recommended denial.
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]


08/20/08
08/20/10.
09/08/08
02/17/09
03/30/09
Commercial Permit (TCP-33864) for an auction located at 4515 Balsam
Avenue. The permit was valid from 03/30/09 to 04/28/09.
04/24/09
Sign Permit (TSP-34287) for a temporary sign at 4515 Balsam Avenue. The
permit was valid from 04/24/09 to 05/24/09.
06/11/09
A Code Enforcement case (#97730) was processed for parking asphalt trucks
on the neighbors property at 4515 Balsam Avenue. The case was resolved
02/01/11
on 02/02/11.
09/13/11
10/24/12
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]


The Planning Commission approved a Variance (VAR-48827) to allow a 14foot side yard setback, where 50 feet is required adjacent to residential
06/11/13
districts on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street. The Department of Planning
The Planning Commission approved a related Variance (VAR-48828) to
allow no wall on the north property line where a six-foot screen wall is
required adjacent to residential property, to allow outdoor storage within
setback and landscape buffer areas, and to allow an existing seven-foot chain
link fence with mesh screening where a solid structure or wall of eight feet is
06/11/13
The Planning Commission approved a related Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-48826) for the conversion of an existing 2,784 square-foot single
family residence to a Contractor's Plant, Shop and Storage Yard office with
Waivers of perimeter landscape buffer standards to allow zero feet on the
north property line and two feet on the south property line where eight feet is
required; and to allow zero feet on the east property line where 15 feet is
06/28/12
c.1972
10/22/07
A Building Permit (#136693) was initiated for a tenant improvement at 4515
03/31/09
Balsam Street. No reviews were ever generated.
11/05/13
02/28/14
03/10/14.
03/24/14
03/18/15.
A building permit (257981) was issued for a for block wall at 4515 Balsam
04/09/14
Street. The permit was finalized on 01/05/15.
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]


06/09/14
permits have been issued, as civil improvement plan (53427) has not been
approved.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants representative and
the submittal requirements for a Variance and Review of Condition to delete
03/31/15
conditions #13 and #16 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) were
discussed.
Field Check
04/28/15
Plant, Shop and Storage Yard with no completed half-street improvements,
multiple vehicles and trailers in front of the building and an unpermitted sign
for auto sales.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.61
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
North
Single Family
Residential
OP (Office Professional
Clark County)
R-E (Rural Estates

Residential Clark
County)
South
Contractors Plant,
Shop and Storage
Yard
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
M (Industrial)
Subject Property
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]

Surrounding
Property
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Private School,
Primary
Planned or Special
LI/R (Light
Industry/Research)
ROW (Right-of-Way)

Park)
ROW (Right-of-Way)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ANALYSIS
4505 Balsam Street. The applicant stated in their justification letter that installing the
improvements is cost prohibitive for the small business owner, who thought that he had
purchased an operational property. The applicant has an ongoing code enforcement case related
to the noncompliance of Condition #13 of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826), which
required the construction of half-street improvements adjacent to this site.
When a site is developed in the City of Las Vegas, it is customary to require the
installation of all incomplete or damaged improvements surrounding the site so they
match what exists in the surrounding area.
JG
VAR-59057 & ROC-59058 [PRJ-58590]

Although half street improvements are scarce in this area, the City is currently working
on building complete streets throughout the City. The mini-storage site to the south
was required to construct half street improvements adjacent to its site several years ago
and Somerset Academy is currently constructing half street improvements directly
across the street from this site. These previous projects have set the precedent for
requiring complete half street improvements adjacent to this site. Therefore, Public
Works recommends denial of this portion of the application.
The City of Las Vegas Public Works Department has been in correspondence with the
Southern Nevada Health District regarding the Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS)
and found that the existing ISDS is insufficient for commercial use. Therefore, Public
Works recommends denial of this portion of the application.
FINDINGS
The subject Contractors Plant, Shop and Storage Yard was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 11, 2013. The proposed Variance and removal of Conditions #13 and #16 are not
appropriate as the applicants representatives agreed to the conditions of approval of Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-48826). Therefore, staff recommends denial of these requests.
NOTICES MAILED
128
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
26
JG
VAR-59057
VAR-59057
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7 7 A 7
AbA
7 A A 7 7
' ' b
7' b
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
b 7A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A b
7 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
bA
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 b A
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7b
7 ' 7 A 7
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A b 7 b A
b7A
A A 7
b A 7

A 7
A
A
7
A 7
7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
7 A
A
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A bA7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7A A
A A 7 A b
A b A 7A A
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
7 ' 7 A 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A7
AA
b 7b
' ' b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
b'b
b A
7 b 7
b A
' ' b
' ' b
'
b A 7 7 7
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
Ab
7 A
A 7
b A
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
A A b 7 7
7 ' 7 A 7 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
b 7 A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
7 A A 7 7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
b A 7
7 7b b 7
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A 7b A
7 A
7 b A
A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7
b A
b A
AA
b 7b
' ' b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
' ' b
'
7A 7 A
Ab
b'b
b A
' ' b
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7 7 A 7
AbA
7 A A 7 7
' ' b
7' b
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
b 7A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A b
7 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
bA
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 b A
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7b
7 ' 7 A 7
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
A 7 AA

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A b 7 b A
b7A
A A 7
b A 7

A 7
A
A
7
A 7
7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
7 A
A
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7 7 A 7
AbA
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
b7
7' b
7 b A
b A 7b 7 b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
b 7A
7 A b A 7 b
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 A b A
7A b
7 7
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
bA
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A
7 A
7 7 7
7A 7 A
7 A
A
7A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A bA7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7A A
A A 7 A b
A b A 7A A
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
7 ' 7 A 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
A b A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
A A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
AA
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A7
AA
b 7b
' ' b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
b'b
b A
7 b 7
b A
' ' b
' ' b
'
b A 7 7 7
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
Ab
7 A
A 7
b A
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
b
A7
A A 7
bb
b 7 A
bA
b b 7
A 7
A 7 A 7 7
7 A A 7
A 7
7 A
7 b A
A 7 7 7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7
A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 A
b 7 7
A 7 7 7 7 b 7 b 7 7 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 A 7 7A 7b 7 7 7 A 7 ' 7 A A 7'
' 7b A 7 A 7 ' 7 A A
7 ' 7 b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 A 7 7 7 7b
7 ' 7 7 A 7 A 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A 7
b 7 ' 7 7 7 7' 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 ' 7 7
7 7 b 7 7
b 7 A A 7' 7 A 7 7 7 7 b 7 A A 7 7 7
b 7 ' 7 7 A 7 7' 7 7A 7b 7 7b A
7
7
' ' b
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
b A 7
A
7 7b b 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7 7 A ' 7 7 7 ' 7 7
A7 b
A 7b A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7 7
A
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
7 7 7
7 A
7 A
7 7 7b A b 7A
7A 7 A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
7 A
A
A A 7
A 7 A
7 7 7 7 7
7 7 b A 7 7 7A
7 7 7b 7
A b A 7
7 7' 7 7 7 7'
7A 7 7 7 A A 7
7A A 7 7 7A b
7 AA
A 7 A b A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7
A 7 7 A 7' A 7 7
A 7 A 7 7 7 7'
7b A 7 7' b
bb
7 7 ' 7 A
7 b 7 A
7 b 7 A
7b
A A b 7 7
7 ' 7 A 7 7

7 7 77777
7 7 7
A 7 AA

A 7
A
A
7
A b 7 b A
b7A
b A 7
A A 7
7b A b 7A
A 7
A

7
A
7

A 7
'
b 7 A 7 A
A 7' 7
A A 7
A
b b 7
A 7
b
7b A b 7A
7 A A 7
A 7 A 7 A A 7

A
A 7
bb
7 7 7777
b 777
A 7 7
7 7 A 7777
bA
AA
b 7 ' 7 A 7 A
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
AbA
7 A A 7 7
7 A b A 7 b
7 A b A
' ' b
7A 7 A
7 7 b
b A 7' b
7' b
7 b A
7 7 A 7
7 A
7 7 A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7' A 7 7 7 A 7
b A 7
7 7b b 7
7 A A 7 A 7
A b 7 7 7 7 b 7 A
7 7 7 b 7A
b A 7' b
7 7 7
7 7 A 7
bA
7A 7 A
7 A
7 A 7
7 7 7b A b 7A
A 7 7' A b A 7 b 7 b
A 7b A
7 A
7 b A
A A 7
7A 7 A
7 A A 7
7 7 b
A 7 A 7 b A 7 b
A 7
b A
b A
AA
b 7b
' ' b
VAR-59057 and ROC-59058
' ' b
'
7A 7 A
Ab
b'b
b A
' ' b
VAR-59057 [PRJ-58590] - VARIANCE RELATED TO ROC-59058 -APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ
4515 BALSAM STREET
04/28/15
VAR-59057 [PRJ-58590] - VARIANCE RELATED TO ROC-59058 -APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO ESPINOZA LOPEZ
4515 BALSAM STREET
04/28/15
VAR-59057

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ROC-59058 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59057 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME LOPEZ AND REFUGIO
ESPINOZA LOPEZ - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of an approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-48826) TO DELETE CONDITION #13 WHICH
STATES, "CONSTRUCT ALL INCOMPLETE HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ADJACENT TO THIS SITE, AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING SUBSTANDARD STREET
IMPROVEMENTS AND UNUSED DRIVEWAY CUTS ADJACENT TO THIS SITE AND
REPLACE WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS MEETING CURRENT CITY STANDARDS
WITHIN TWO YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THIS APPROVAL" AND TO DELETE
CONDITION #16 WHICH STATES, "THIS SITE SHALL CONNECT TO PUBLIC SEWER
IN RED COACH AVENUE AND ABANDON THE INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SYSTEM (ISDS) ACCORDING TO SNHD REGULATIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS SITE" on 0.61 acres at 4515 Balsam Street
(APN 138-03-602-007), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-58590].
Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Action Letter for SDR-48826

paper use, backup
ROC-59058
ROC-59058
ROC-59058
ROC-59058
ROC-59058
ROC-59058
ROC-59058

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-58494 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: Y & B
INVESTMENTS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE FIVE ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE
REQUIRED on 0.54 acres at 2521 South Fort Apache Road (APN 163-07-501-012), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ-58394]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: Y & B INVESTMENTS, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-58494
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review [Z-007686(15)].
2.
3.
4.
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)
May 12, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow zero additional parking spaces where five spaces
are required for the expansion of an existing restaurant use at 2521 South Fort Apache Road,
Suite #102. Currently, the 4,910 square-foot commercial building is parking impaired and
consists of one office space and three restaurant uses. The applicant is requesting to expand an
existing 840 square-foot restaurant use, located within suite #102, into the adjacent suite #103,
which was previously occupied by a General Personal Service use (Dry Cleaners). According to
Title 19, a restaurant use has a more intense parking requirement than that of the previous
General Personal Service use. The proposed Variance request would account for the increase in
parking that is required, or five additional parking spaces. The proposed Variance is selfimposed as the proposed expansion to the restaurant use is too intense for the site to
accommodate; therefore, staff recommends denial. If the application is denied, the existing
restaurant use could not expand into the adjacent suite.
ISSUES
x
A Variance is required to allow zero additional parking spaces where 5 parking spaces
are required.
The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (Z-0076-86) from N-U
(Non-Urban) to R-PD6 (Residential Planned Development 6 Units per
Acre), R-PD20 (Residential Planned Development 20 Units per Acre) and
C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property bounded by Desert Inn Road on the
11/05/86
south, Fort Apache Road on the east, Sahara Avenue on the north and
Hualapai Way on the west. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review [Z-0076-86(15)] for
a 4,915 square-foot general retail building located on the west side of Fort
05/27/93
Apache Road, approximately 360 feet south of Sahara Avenue. Staff
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Plot Plan Review (Z0076-86(16)] for a 10,000 square-foot office building located on the west side
08/26/93
of Fort Apache Road, approximately 360 feet south of Sahara Avenue. Staff
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-41292)
for a restaurant with service bar use within an existing 2,318 square-foot
restaurant with a waiver to allow a 360-foot distance separation from a house
06/15/11
of worship where 400 feet is the minimum required at 2521 South Fort
Apache Road, Suite #100. Planning Commission recommended approval.
Staff recommended denial.

01/22/04

A business license (R60-03139) was issued for an office use at 2521 South
11/16/07
Fort Apache Road, Suite #104. The license remains active.
A business license (R10-01001) was issued for a restaurant use at 2521 South
08/06/10
Fort Apache Road, Suite #102. The license was marked out of business on
05/30/14.
A business license (D50-00117) was issued for a general personal service use
(dry cleaners) at 2521 South Fort Apache Road, Suite #103. The license was
07/18/12
marked out of business on 11/28/14.
09/11/12
01/28/15.
12/09/13
11/28/14.
A business license (G63-01854) is being reviewed by staff for a restaurant use
03/11/15
at 2521 South Fort Apache Road, Suite #102.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discuss
the proposed parking Variance. The representative stated that the subject site
03/18/15
consisted of three restaurants and an office space. Staff concluded that only
the office use had an active business license and that a parking Variance
would be required to locate three additional restaurant uses on the subject site.
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff conducted a routine field check and noted three restaurant uses, an office
use, and a vacant tenant space within a commercial building at 2521 South
Fort Apache Road.

Site Area
Gross Acres
0.54
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Restaurant
Office, Other Than
Listed
North
General Retail
South
Individual Care
Center
East
General Retail
West
Office, Other Than

Listed
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Sahara West Walkable Community Plan
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Fort Apache Road
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section

and Highways
100 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
899 SF
1:50 SF
18
Dining Area
Restaurant
609 SF
Suite #100
Remaining
1:200 SF
4
GFA
220 SF
1:50 SF
5
Dining Area
Restaurant
617
Suite #101
1:200 SF
4
Remaining
GFA
365 SF
1:50 SF
-8
Dining Area
Existing
Restaurant
475 SF
Suite #102
1:200 SF
-3
Remaining
GFA
General
Personal
Service #103
1,000 SF
1:250 SF
-4
(Out of
business)
Proposed
632 SF
1:50 SF
Restaurant
Expansion
20
#102 and
1,208 SF
1:200 SF
#103
Office, Other
Than Listed
725 SF
1:300 SF
3
Suite #104
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
54
28
N*
51
3
26
2
N*
Percent Deviation
48%
*The site is parking impaired. Currently, the subject site requires 49 parking spaces while
providing 28 spaces. The proposed restaurant expansion increases the parking impairment by
five spaces, which requires the Variance.
ANALYSIS
In 1993, the City Council approved a Plot Plan Review [Z-0076-86(15)] for a 4,910 square-foot
general retail building with 28 parking spaces at 2125 South Fort Apache Road. Since the
original approval, the subject site has consisted of a mixture of restaurant and office uses within
five existing tenant spaces. As recently as 2014, the subject site had active business licenses for
three restaurant uses, an office use, and a general personal service use. According to Title 19.18,
the subject site is considered parking impaired, as the five uses required 49 parking spaces while
only 28 spaces were provided.
On 11/28/14, the general personal service use (dry cleaners), located within suite #103 was
marked out of business. The applicant is requesting to expand an existing 840 square-foot
restaurant use, located within suite #102, into the adjacent vacant suite #103, which was
previously occupied by a General Personal Service use (Dry Cleaners). The proposed restaurant
use would occupy two suites totaling 1,840 square feet.
According to Title 19.12, a restaurant use has a more intense parking requirement than that of the
previous General Personal Service use. The existing restaurant use proposes to expand and
remodel resulting in 632 square feet of dining area and 1,208 square feet of remaining gross floor
area, which requires 20 parking spaces. In total, the subject site would be required to provide 54
parking spaces, which is an additional five parking spaces. According to Title
19.18.030(D)(1)(b), any remodeling, alteration, or expansion of a parking-impaired development
that requires an increase in the number of required parking spaces, including the expansion of
existing buildings or the construction of new buildings, only the increased number of parking
spaces shall be required. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a Variance to account for the
increase in parking that is required as a result of the change in use within suite #103, or five
additional parking spaces.
GK
VAR-58494 (PRJ-58394)
The proposed Variance is self-imposed as the proposed expansion to the restaurant use is too
intense for the site to accommodate; therefore, staff recommends denial. If the application is
denied, the existing restaurant use could not expand into the adjacent suite.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a use that is too intense for the site to
accommodate. The location of another General Personal Service use within suite #103 or a less
intense use than the proposed restaurant would not increase the existing parking deficiency and
allow conformance to the Title 19.18 parking impairment requirements. In view of the absence
of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances.
NOTICES MAILED
607
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
14
GK
VAR-58494
VAR-58494
77
7A
bA77
VAR-58494 - REVISED
VAR-58494 - REVISED
VAR-58494 [PRJ-58934] - VARIANCE -APPLICANT/OWNER: Y & B INVESTMENTS, LLC

2521 SOUTH FORT APACHE ROAD
05/05/15

05/05/15

05/05/15

05/05/15

05/05/15

05/05/15
7b7777
A77777
777>7A77
77777777777G
777777A777
7777777777777
77777777777
7G7777777
777G777777G77
777777777777
7777777777G777
G
777777777777
777777777777A7
7777777777
777777777777
7777777G77777
7777777777777
777777
b7b7A
VAR-58494

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-59211 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS WHERE
SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the northeast corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte
Cristo Way (APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58883].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029 [PRJ-58883]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029 [PRJ-58883]
3. Supporting Documentation - WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029 [PRJ-58883]
4. Photo(s) - WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029 [PRJ-58883]
5. Justification Letter - WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029 [PRJ-58883]
6. Protest and Support Postcards - WVR-59211 and VAR-59031 [PRJ-58883]
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON
CASE
NUMBER
WVR-59211
VAR-59029
VAR-59031
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
2.
Safety.
3.
A Waiver from of Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lighting where such is required is
approved.
4.
5.
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

Conditions Page Two
Public Works
6.
paving, streetlights and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Tropical Parkway and Monti
Cristo Way adjacent to this site. The Covenant agreement must be recorded with the
County Recorder and a copy of the recorded document must be provided to the prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this site.
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

3.
4.
Public Works
5.
paving, streetlights and possibly fire hydrants and sewers) on Tropical Parkway and Monti
Cristo Way adjacent to this site. The Covenant agreement must be recorded with the
County Recorder and a copy of the recorded document must be provided to the prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this site.
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Variance to allow a single-family detached dwelling with a 20-foot front
yard setback where 50 feet is the minimum allowed by Title 19.06.060 development standards.
In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver of Title 19.02.240 and Variance of Title
19.04 Complete Street development standards; to allow no half-street improvements, including
amenity zone, sidewalk and streetlights to the right-of-way along Monte Cristo Way and
Tropical Parkway. The site is located at the northeast corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte
Cristo Way, within an R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. No unique or extraordinary
evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Variance. As such, the hardship is selfimposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of this request.
ISSUES
x
x
x
A Waiver is required to allow no installation of off-site street lighting required by Title

19.02.240 development standards.
A Variance is required to allow a principal dwelling within an R-E (Residence Estates) zone
to have a 20-foot front yard setback where 50 feet is required by Title 19.06.
A Variance is required to allow no off-site Complete Street improvements along Monte
Cristo Way and Tropical Parkway required by Title 19.04 development standards.
The City Council approved a petition to Annex (ANX-57239) 0.91 acres at
03/18/15
the Northeast Corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Way.
The Department of Planning accepted a Parcel Map (PMP-58508) for
processing for reversion to acreage of two lots on 0.91 acres at the northeast
03/25/15
corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Way. The map was recorded on
04/29/15.

02/28/14
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)


A building permit (#281028) was approved for a perimeter walls only. With a
six-foot rear yard and side yard wall; and a two-foot block with three-foot
04/09/15
iron fence along the front (Monte Cristo Way) at 6000 North Monte Cristo
Way. The permit has not been finalized.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
requirements for a Waiver and two Variance applications. For a proposed
04/15/15
single-family dwelling that is located 20 feet from the front property line
where 50 feet is the minimum required with no off-site improvements.
A neighborhood meeting is not required for this type of request nor was one held.
Field Check
04/30/15
A site visit was conducted and the subject site is an undeveloped lot with no
off-site street improvements along Monte Cristo Way and Tropical Parkway.
There are three vehicles including a RV trailer and construction materials
being stored on the northern portion of the site adjacent to the existing singlefamily dwelling.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.91
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Single-Family
Detached
South
Single-Family
Detached
Planned or Special
ML (Medium Low
RS (Residential
Suburban) Clark
County
ML (Medium Low

R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
East
Single-Family
Detached
West
Single-Family
Detached
Planned or Special
RS (Residential
Suburban) Clark
County
ML (Medium Low

R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark
County
R-PD7 (Residential
Units per Acre)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to Title 19.06.060, the following R-E (Residence Estates) standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Size
20,000 SF
39,640 SF
Y
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
163 Feet
Y
Min. Setbacks
x Front
50 Feet
20 Feet
N
x Side (North)
10 Feet
Y
98 Feet
x Corner
15 Feet
Y
15 Feet
35 Feet
96 Feet
Y
x Rear
Min. Distance Between Buildings
6 Feet
24 Feet
Y
Dwelling Unit per Lot
1 Dwelling
1 Dwelling
Y
24 Feet
35 Feet (Two Stories) (One Story)
Y
Mech. Equipment
Not on Roof
Not on Roof
Y
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document

Highways
Tropical Parkway
Major Collector
Highways
*See note on Streetscape Standards Table below
Monte Cristo Way
Minor Collector
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
60 Feet
N*
80 Feet
N*
Required
Provided
Compliance
Half-street improvements,
Monte Cristo Way (60 Minor
No Improvements
N*
including amenity zone,
Collector Street)
sidewalk and streetlights
Half-street improvements,
Tropical Parkway (80 Major
including amenity zone,
No Improvements
N*
Collector Street)
sidewalk and streetlights
*The applicant has a requested a Waiver (WVR-59161) and Variance (VAR-59031) to waive all
Title 19.02 improvement requirements and 19.04 complete street development standards
associated with the undeveloped half-street improvements along Monte Cristo Way and Tropical
Parkway adjacent to the subject site.
ANALYSIS
This is a request for a Variance (VAR-59029) to allow a single-family detached dwelling with a
20-foot front yard setback where 50 feet is the minimum allowed by Title 19.06.060
development standards. The site is located at the northeast corner of Tropical Parkway and
Monte Cristo Way. The subject property lot size is 39,640 square feet in size with a lot width of
163 feet, which is consistent with the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
The submitted site plan proposes development of a 4,740 square-foot one-story detached singlefamily dwelling with a 2,025 square-foot Accessory Structure (Class II) on a flat undeveloped
0.90 acre lot surrounded by existing single-family residential property. The subject property is
located on a site with a land use designation of ML (Medium Low Density Residential), and an
underlying zone designation of R-E (Residence Estates). Per Title 19.06.060, R-E zoned parcels
require a 50-foot setback from the front property line along public streets; this project proposes
to develop a single-family detached dwelling which is setback 20 feet from the front property
line.
In addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver (WVR-59161) of Title 19.02.240
improvement requirements and Variance (VAR-59031) of Title 19.04 Complete Street
development standards; to allow no off-site half-street improvements to the segment of right-of
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

way along Monte Cristo Way and Tropical Parkway adjacent to the subject site. Currently, the
half-street improvements along the segment of Monte Cristo Way and Tropical Parkway adjacent
to the subject site have not been completed. These improvements include the development of the
half-street and amenity zone improvements; which include installation of utilities, street lights,
sidewalk and trees. Furthermore, both street alignments encroach into Clark Countys
jurisdiction as they extend to the north and east of the subject site.
The City is currently working on building complete streets throughout the City. Although, the
adjacent properties to this site are currently within Clark County jurisdiction and do not have offsite improvements, there are currently half street improvements across the roadway to this site on
Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Street. No substantial evidence has been presented to
warrant the requested Waiver and two Variances. The proposed structure and half-street
improvements can be redesigned to meet current code requirements. As such, the hardship is
self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial of all three requests.
No substantial evidence has been presented to warrant the requested Waiver of Title 19.02.240 to
allow no street lighting, staff recommends denial of the request with conditions.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to construct a 4,740 square-foot single-family
dwelling 20 feet from the front property line where 50 feet is minimum required by code. The
proposed single-family dwelling could be placed within an alternative location that will allow for
conformance to Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the
sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to not construct the half-street improvements
associated with the rights-of-way adjacent to the subject site. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants
hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for
granting of Variances.
NOTICES MAILED
28
308 - WVR-59211 and VAR-59031

308 - VAR-59029
JB
WVR-59211 &VAR-59029 & VAR-59031 (PRJ-58883)

APPROVALS
2 - WVR-59211 and VAR-59031

0 - VAR-59029
PROTESTS
2 - WVR-59211 and VAR-59031

0 - VAR-59029
JB
WVR-59211
WVR-59211
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029
WVR-59211 [PRJ-58883] - WAIVER RELATED TO VAR-59029 AND VAR-59031 -APPLICANT/OWNER:

CRAIG JOHNSON
NORTHEAST CORNER OF TROPICAL PARKWAY AND MONTE CRISTO WAY
04/30/15

CRAIG JOHNSON
04/30/15

CRAIG JOHNSON
04/30/15

b777
777
777
777
77
b
777)
77)77777)777777777777b
777777
7777)777
777777)77777777777777
777777777777777777)
77777)7777777)777)777777777
)7777777777777
7777777777777777777
777777777
77
777)77)777777
777777777777)777)77
77
7
777b7
7 b7 7b77A
77
bA77
777
b7
WVR-59211, VAR-59031 and VAR-59029

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59031 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59211 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW NO HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING AMENITY ZONE AND
SIDEWALK WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the northeast corner of Tropical
Parkway and Monte Cristo Way (APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-58883]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-59031
VAR-59031

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-59029 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59211 AND VAR-59031 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG JOHNSON - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A 20-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 50 FEET IS
REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at the northeast corner of Tropical Parkway and Monte Cristo Way
(APN 125-27-203-011), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58883]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-59029
VAR-59029

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-58913 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PPS2, LLC OWNER: BOCA PARK MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GROUP, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER ON-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT USE WITHIN A PROPOSED 3,479 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL
PERSONAL SERVICE USE (INSTRUCTIONAL ARTS STUDIO) at 1000 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite #10 (APN 138-32-412-018), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Beers)
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest and Support Postcards
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT: PPS2, LLC OWNER: BOCA PARK
MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GROUP, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-58913
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Beer/Wine/Cooler
On-Sale Establishment use.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
No one under 21 years of age shall be permitted within areas designated for alcohol beverage
consumption and/or storage.
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
Conditions Page Two
7.
Municipal Code.
8.
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment within
a proposed general personal service use (instructional arts studio) located at 1000 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite #10. The proposed instructional arts studio is located within an existing 31,740
square-foot commercial building, which is a part of an existing 641,664 square-foot shopping
center. The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use and instructional arts studio would occupy
a suite with 3,479 square feet of interior space. The proposed use is consistent with Title 19 and
is compatible with the other restaurant, retail and office uses located within the surrounding
community. Staff, therefore recommends approval of the requested Special Use Permit, with
conditions. If denied, the general personal service use (instructional arts studio) would not be
allowed to serve alcohol on the premises.
ISSUES
x
x
The Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited

Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
There are no protected uses within 400 feet of the subject property.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0030-92) to C-1 (Limited
09/02/92
Commercial) and R-1 (Single Family Residential) on property located at the
northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Rampart Boulevard.
Per the District Court, Clark County, Nevada ordered the grant of a Writ of
Mandate to affirm the City Councils approval of the zoning of the subject
12/11/92
site to C-1 and R-1 for development of a regional shopping mall and single
family residential dwellings and to establish conditions of approval, including
the approval of 1,100,000 square feet of commercial buildings.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [Z-0030-92(2)] for a
02/01/95
proposed Shopping Mall and Single-Family Residential dwellings. Staff
The City Council approved an Extension of Time [Z-0030-92(3)] for a
03/06/96
proposed Shopping Mall and Single-Family Residential dwellings. Staff
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
[(Z-0030-92(5)] for a proposed 433,240 square-foot retail shopping center
including 21 retail pad sites on 48.7 acres located on the northeast corner of
04/27/98
Rampart Boulevard and Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval of this request.
The City Council granted an appeal by Charleston Associates, Limited
Liability Company for a Site Plan Development Plan Review [(Z-0030-92(7)]
for a proposed commercial development consisting of 434,967 square feet of
06/14/99
Retail and 58,418 square feet of Office uses within Phase One of the
previously approved Shopping Center on 48.7 acres located on the northeast
corner of Charleston Boulevard and Rampart Boulevard.
Staff administratively approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
[Z-0012-98(4)] for a proposed 50,750 square-foot retail shell building and
11/06/01
23,047 square-foot retail shell building on a portion of 41.87 acres on the east
side of Rampart Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet south of Alta Drive.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0142-01) for a restaurant
with service bar in conjunction with a proposed restaurant at 1000 South
01/16/02
Rampart Boulevard, Suite #16. Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0151-01) for a Supper
Club in conjunction with a proposed restaurant on property located adjacent
02/20/02
to the east side of Rampart Boulevard, approximately 750 feet south of Alta
Drive. Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-23436) for a
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment use within an existing restaurant at
10/17/07
1000 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #7. Planning Commission and staff
Staff administratively approved a minor amendment (SDR-32481) to a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review [Z-0030-92(7)] for a
01/14/09
7,885 square-foot addition to an existing 139,115 square-foot general retail
store at 8750 West Charleston Boulevard.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-44162) for a
02/14/12
3,600 square-foot Supper Club use at 1000 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite
#21. Staff recommended approval.

07/07/05
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)

A building permit (#13837) was issued for a 31,740 square-foot commercial
building at 1000 South Rampart Boulevard. The permit received a final
07/24/00
inspection on 02/26/01.
A building permit (#221150) was issued for an interior tenant improvement at
10/04/12
1000 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #10. The permit did not receive a final
inspection.
A building permit (#225063) was issued for a wall sign at 1000 South
12/05/12
Rampart Boulevard, Suite #10. The permit received a final inspection on
02/11/13.
01/08/13
1000 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #10. The permit received a final
inspection on 04/16/13.
A business license (G50-08807) was issued for a general retail use at 1000
South Rampart Boulevard, Suite #10. The business license has not been
02/07/13
renewed and is set to expire on 06/01/15.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants representative to
discuss the submittal requirements for requesting a Special Use Permit for a
04/14/15
proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale establishment within an existing
Shopping Center.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff performed a routine field check and noted a well maintained shopping
center.

Site Area
Gross Acres
A 2.38-acre portion of a 47.30-acre shopping center.
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Shopping Center
North
Shopping Center
Shopping Center
South
Shopping Center
Single Family,
Detached
Multi-Family
Residential
East
Shopping Center
West
Utility Pumping
Station
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
GC (General
Commercial)
L (Low Density
Residential)
M (Medium Density
Residential
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-V (Civic)
SC (Service
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Peccole Ranch Master Plan
Trails (Pedestrian Path)
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Charleston Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Rampart Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100 Feet
100 Feet
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
641,664 SF
1:250 SF
2,567
Center
2,567
2,639
Y
2,531
36
2,603
36
Y
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale establishment use within a proposed
3,479 square-foot general personal service use (instructional arts studio) at 1000 South Rampart
Boulevard, Suite #10. The property is zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial), which intends to
encourage low to medium intensity retail, office or other commercial uses. The proposed
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use is permissible in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone with the
approval of a Special Use Permit. The tenant space is located within an existing 31,740 squarefoot commercial building, which is a part of an existing 641,664 square-foot shopping center.
The existing shopping center provides shared access and parking throughout the subject site. The
proposal adheres to all minimum parking requirements.
A Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use is described in Tile 19.12 as: An establishment whose license
to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers only for consumption
on the premises where the same is sold.
establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected uses within 400 feet of the
subject property.
Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two property
lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest to the existing
use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use
which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term property line
refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property line of:
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)

b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site parking and
which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.
The proposed use meets this requirement; measurement is taken from the existing property line
of the commercial subdivision located at the northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and
Rampart Boulevard.
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in size,
the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the structure
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping center
or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the existing use to the
nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will
be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as the parcel on which it is proposed is less
than 80 acres in size.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also requires a
waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shall take into
consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation to the City Council,
state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support of the
decision.
This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as no distance separation waiver is
necessary.
a. An establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.
Neither condition applies to the proposed use.
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC
Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in LVMC
Chapter 6.50 if approved.
The submitted floor plan, date stamped 04/16/15 indicates two separate artist rooms within the
3,479 square-foot tenant space. No one under the age of 21 years of age shall be permitted within
the designated areas serving alcohol. A condition of approval has been added to address the
issue. The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use would be located within an established
shopping center with retail and restaurant uses located on the site. The existing shopping center
provides cross-access and shared parking throughout the entire commercial center. No additional
parking is required for the proposed use, as the parking requirements were addressed during the
original development of the site. There are no protected uses within 400 feet of the subject
property and the proposed use adheres to all Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements as
outlined in Title 19.12. As such, the use is compatible with the surrounding land uses and staff
recommends approval with conditions. If approved, the applicant would have to apply and
receive approval from the Business Licensing Divisions for a Beer/Wine Room business license
prior to serving alcohol.
1.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale use will be ancillary to the proposed general
personal service use (instructional arts studio) at the subject site. The proposed use is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious with surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is located within an existing commercial shopping center that is physically
suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
GK
SUP-58913 (PRJ-58881)
Access to the site will not change. The property is accessed by Rampart Boulevard and
Charleston Boulevard and both roads are designated as 100-foot wide Primary Arterials as
classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
4.
General Plan.
5.
The proposed use meets all applicable conditions of approval for a Beer/Wine/Cooler OnSale use per Title 19.12.
NOTICES MAILED
1250
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
33
GK
7
7 77
A AbA
b77
SUP-58913
77777070777b
77A7 7b
777 777
777770777777777b7b7
7b777777777777
777777777777
77777777
97
77777777b7b777b77
7777 7 777777 77b 77
77A777A7777777777
777777
b7
A
777
77b7=7 7 7 07
7777
7 77 7 7 7
7 7
777777b777
7AA
A7
77
7 47
77
A707
7
4 7 A b
7 7
AbA
A77 77777777
7A77777777777
7 777
777777
A777
7 7
777
b77
7A
77 7
7A7
7
A7
7 7070777b7 b
A7777A777
777
b777
7A
A b A 77b7
b7
7A
A77b777
77
b77
7A7 77
A 7 7 77
b7
777
A7
777777
777
b7
77
7 7
7A7 70
777
777777777777 777777 707777777b7777
777777777777777777777777 7777
7777777777777777777770777777777
77 7 7
A7777777777777777777
7 7 b47 7 7 7
7777
7 7
77 77
77
7 =
777777b77
7
7 A 77
b7 SUP-58913
7
7
7
7
b
7
A77A
7

7
7 7
77777777
7
7 7 7 7 7
777
777
7777
A70A7
7
77
77b777
b7b77
7
7
7
77777 7
A 7
A77
77
777
777
A 7 7
777 7
77A
7
7
A 7Ab77 7b77
7Ab77 77 777
b77A 77A77
7777b
77 7
7 777
70707 7 b
777777
0777
777777777777
A777777777070777b
77777777777777
b77
777777777777b77
7777b77b7 b77b777b7 77b
77777 77
77
77
A 7777777777777777777
7777b7A
7
77 7 7 7777
SUP-58913
7
7
7
7
7
0 4 7 7
7 7 7
7 7
7 A77
7 7
7
7 77 7 7
7 07
7
7 7
b7
777
b7 7

7
7
77
A7
77 7

A77
77
7 b7
7077

7
7
07b7
77
07 A
77
0777
A7 7
77
77
7
7747 7
7 7
7 7
77
77
7 7 77
77b7
A b
A77 77 7
7 A7
7
7
7 A 7
7
77A 7
7 7
7 7
77
7
7
7 7
7
7 7 7 b
777
7
7777
77
7 77
77A 7
7b7
77
77
77
7b7
7 7
7 7 7
77
7
7 7
7b7
7
7 7
7b7
b7
A7b7
77A7 7
77
b
7A 7
b
7A7
b
A7
b
7 777
b
77
7A 7
b
7 7A77
b
7
7
7 b 7
7 77
7A7 b7 7A
77 7
7 7
7A77
b
7
b
7A77
7
7A77 7
b
7A 7
b
7 7 7
A A
7
7A 7
7A
7
7
77
74747777
7
7 7
7 7
SUP-58913
777b777A77777
77 77A77777 7
7777b
7 7
A
77AA777
A7A777
77A7Ab7
7 7A77Ab7
7
7 77
SUP-58913
b77A777
77A777
b7
7 7
A
77AA7
AA77
7 7A Ab
7 7AAb
77
7 7
77 7
7 7 7
7 7 7
77 b 7 7
A 7
A 7
7
0b0
777 7
7
77
7 7
07
7
A7
7 A 7
A
AA
7
7
7b
77
7 7
77
A7
bA
7
b
7b7
b 7A
7b7 7
7 7
A 7
bA

7A
7
AA
A
A77
7 7
A
77
b
A
7A 7 7
77
b
A
b
7A 7
7b7
b
77
b
7 7
A
b
77
A
A
77
7A77bA77
7A
77AA777
A7A77
77A7Ab
7
7 7A77Ab
SUP-58913
b77
7
77
47
7
47
7 7 7
4747
77
77 7
47
7 7 7
0
7 7
77
SUP-58913
77
7 7
077
7 b7

7 7
7
7777

7 7
7 7
7
7 7 7 77
77

777 77 7 7
777 77

7 47
7 7 7
7
477bb7 7 4 777 b 7
7 b 7
7
A
77 AA7
A7A77
77AAb
7 7A77Ab
7 7 77
4
7 7
7 7
7
7
77 7 77 7
77 b4
SUP-58913 [PRJ-58881] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: PPS2, LLC - OWNER: BOCA PARK
MARKETPLACE SYNDICATIONS GROUP, LLC
1000 SOUTH RAMPART BOULEVARD, SUITE #10
04/30/15
A 77 A A
A7A7A
7 7 A A 777
A7A7 A A 7
A77
b777
777
777
77 7
7 777A
A7
77
77
7A7
A 7
7 b
777
7
77777777
7
7777 b 77777A777
777777777777
7A777777777777
77
77777777777
7
7777A777777777
b77777 7A7707777
777777
777777777A77777
7777777777777777
7777777777777777777
7777777777777
77777 7777 77
77777777777777
77777777777777
SUP-58913
A7 A A
b77777777
A77
7
A 7A 7 A
77777777777777
77777A7777777777
777777777777
777777777777 77
7777777707777
7777777
777777777777
077b777777777 7b77
777 77777777777
77777777 777 77
7
7777777777777777
7707
77
A7 A A
777
777
7 7A77
7777
7
SUP-58913

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59007 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LEE''S LIQUOR
- OWNER: INLAND WESTERN LAS VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 7,084 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR SALES
(PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT) USE at 6990 North Durango Drive
(APN 125-20-710-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [MT-TC (Montecito Town Center Mixed-Use
Commercial Special Land Use Designation)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58937]. NOTE: THE
CORRECT ADDRESS IS 6690 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Postcard
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LEE'S LIQUOR - OWNER: INLAND WESTERN
LAS VEGAS MONTENCITO, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59007
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review [Z-0076-98
(24)].
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
6.
Municipal Code.
7.
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed 7,084 square-foot Liquor Sales (a
Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment) use located at 6690 North Durango Drive. The subject
site is an existing Shopping Center, which provides cross-access and shared parking throughout
the entire commercial center. The proposed use will have no immediate impact in terms of
provided onsite parking or surrounding land uses. In Montecito Town Center there are no
minimum Special Use Permit requirements for the Liquor Sales use. As this request meets code
and can be conducted in a compatible and harmonious manner within the existing Shopping
Center, staff recommends approval of this application. If denied, the applicant will not be
allowed to conduct a Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment use at this location.
ISSUES
x
A Liquor Sale (Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment) use is permitted in the MT-TC
(Montecito Town Center Mixed-Use Commercial Special Land Use designation) with the
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0076-98
(24)] for a 361,560 square-foot retail commercial center at the southeast
01/16/02
corner of El Captain Way and Deer Springs Way. The Planning Commission
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-1525) request to allow
04/02/03
a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) at 6640 North Durango Drive, Suite #110.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-2777) request for a
Liquor Establishment (Tavern) at 8725 West Deer Springs Way. The
11/05/03
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-2298) request to allow
07/16/03
a Supper Club at 6760 North Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-47545)
01/08/13
request for a Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment at 6760 North
Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)

10/12/05

A building permit (#4001819) was issued for a retail shell at 6690 North
01/27/04
Durango Drive. The permit was finalized on 11/17/04.
A building permit (#283424) was applied from a Tenant Improvement at 6690
03/31/15
North Durango Drive; however, it has not been issued as of 05/21/15.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants designated
04/20/15
representative to discuss the Special Use Permit submittal requirements for a
Liquor Sale use Montecito Town Center.
A neighborhood meeting was not held, nor was one required.
Field Check
04/30/15
A site inspection was conducted on the property, which revealed the property
was clean and graffiti free. The suite was vacant.

Site Area
Net Acres
20.78
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Shopping Center
Planned or Special
MT-TC (Montecito
Town Center MixedUse Commercial) and
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
North
Hospital
South
Freeway
East
Single-Family,
Detached
West
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
MT-TC (Montecito
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center)
Right-Of-Way
MT-TC (Montecito
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center)
UT-TC (Urban Center
Mixed-Use - Town
Center)
T-C (Town Center)
Right-Of-Way
T-C (Town Center)
U [Undeveloped (TC Town Center)]
Master Plan Areas

Town Center Master Plan
Montecito Town Center
T-C (Town Center) District
Trails
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N
Y
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
361,560 SF
1:250 SF
1,447
Center
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1,447
1,663
Y
1,422
25
1,608
55
Y
ANALYSIS
The proposed Liquor Sale (Packaged Liquor Off-Sale Establishment) use is located in the MTTC (Montecito Town Center Mixed-Use Commercial) Special Land Use designation and the
Town Center Master Plan. Per Section 2.3 of the Montecito Town Center Development Liquor
Sales has no specific spacing requirement between the establishment that has on or off-premise
alcohol sales and/or restricted gaming within the Montecito Town Center area, and no Special
Use Permits for separation between these establishments are necessary. There are no other
Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishments within the Shopping Center, but two exist north and
west of the Shopping Center. There are no minimum Special Use Permit requirements; however,
staff notes that there is not a house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children or City park within 400 feet of the subject site. The Montecito Development
Agreement does not define Liquor Sale; however, the corresponding land use in Town Center
and Title 19.12 is Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment.
A Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment use is described in Title 19.12 as: An establishment,
other than a retail establishment with package liquor off-sale, whose license to sell alcoholic
beverages authorizes their sale to consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked
containers, for consumption off the premises where the same are sold. This use includes an
establishment that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting if the licensee also
holds a wine, cordial and liqueur tasting license for that location.
The applicant meets this definition; per the justification letter the Lees Liquor sells wines, liquor
and spirits.
completed and distributed to the required departments and agencies; however, no comments
were returned.
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)
There are no minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for Liquor Sales (Package Liquor OffSale Establishments) with Montecito Town Center. The Shopping Center is designed to
accommodate a wide variety of retail, office and commercial uses and is appropriate for Liquor
Sales. The commercial center has cross access and parking throughout the site. This location has
ample parking. Staff recommends approval of this request, as the use complies with code
requirements and can be conducted harmoniously with existing neighborhood and surrounding
land uses.
1.
The proposed Liquor Sales (a Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment use) will be located
within a 7,084 square-foot commercial space, located in a Shopping Center in a MT-TC
(Montecito Town Center Mixed-Use Commercial) land use area. The proposed use can be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the uses on the existing site
and with the commercial uses on the adjacent properties.
2.
The subject site is a 361,560 square-foot shopping center and is suitable for the type and
intensity of land use proposed. The proposed Liquor Sale establishment will occupy an
existing commercial space and will not require any additional parking beyond what has
been provided for the existing shopping center.
3.
Site access is provided from Durango Drive, a 130-foot Town Center Parkway street with
sufficient size to accommodate the needs of the proposed Liquor Sale use.
4.
General Plan.
MR
SUP-59007 (PRJ-58937)
Approval of a Special Use Permit for this use at this location will not compromise the
public health, safety, or welfare, as the use is subject to licensing and inspections by the
City of Las Vegas. The use is consistent with the existing uses in the shopping center and
the area. .
5.
The proposed Liquor Sales (a Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment) use meets the
applicable conditions per Montecito Town Center Development Agreement, Town Center
Development Standards and Title 19.12.
NOTICES MAILED
696
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
38
MR
SUP-59007
SUP-59007
SUP-59007
b7
7777bb
A
SUP-59007
77
77
7777 7777
77
A7AA7
77
G7
77
7
G77
A77
b7A
b
bA
7G
A
A7
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
7
7
77
7A
A
77
7bA77
A7b77A
bA7A
>>b
Ab777
A77AA
7AA7
A77AA7bAbA
7777777777
77A7
b7 7777777
G77 77
7 77b
7G7b
>A
7
7
777A
77A7
7A7A777
7
7
7
7
G77
7
77
7
7G
G7
77
7b7777
b7
7A7
AA7
A7
AbA
b
b
b
7
77
7A77bbA7AA7
7
7
7
7
A7
b777b7
bA
b77b7b7
7A7
77
7>A
7
G77
777777
7
7
77A7
G
7
G
7
777777
7777777
777777
b7
7777bb
b77b7b7
7b
7
77
77
7b77
7b
7
77
77
7b77
SUP-59007
77
77
7b7777
777
777
A77
b7
7777bb
b77b7b7
777
>>b
77
b7A
A7AA
bA
7AA
77A7
A7AA7
7bA77
A7b77A
bA7A
>>b
Ab777
A77AA
7AA7
SUP-59007
77
77
>7A
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
77>
A77AA7bAbA
7b7777
7A7b
7b
A77
SUP-59007 [PRJ-58937] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT:

WESTERN LAS VEGAS MONTECITO, LLC
6990 NORTH DURANGO DRIVE
04/30/15
LEE'S LIQUOR - OWNER: INLAND
A77
b777
77
777
777
7
7
>bA77777A7
b7b777777777
7777b
777777777777777
777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777777777777777
7b77b77777b7b7b7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777b77b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7
>7777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777777
7777777777777777
77G77777
77b77777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777777
7
777777777777777
77777777777
77
b7b7
777777
SUP-59007
77777A
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59012 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NO DRAMA
BAIL BONDS - OWNER: PLAZA LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,363 SQUARE-FOOT BAILBOND
SERVICE at 546 Eastern Avenue, Suite #130 (APN 139-36-110-040), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58746]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS - OWNER: PLAZA
LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59012
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
Planning
1.
2.
Prior to occupancy, all necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall
be completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of
Building and Safety.
3.
building permit.
4.
YK
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed Bailbond Service located at 546 North
Eastern Avenue, Suite #130, in an existing in line shopping center. The applicant is proposing to
operate a 1,380 square-foot Bailbond Service at the subject location. Currently, the suite is
vacant. The proposed Bailbond Service is compatible and harmonious with the existing and
surrounding land uses, as this location is a commercial area on a major thoroughfare. Staff
recommends approval of the request.
ISSUES
x
A Bailbond Service is allowed in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) district, with an approved

Special Use Permit. Staff supports the request.
The City Council approved a Rezoning request (Z-0062-02) from R-E
09/18/02
(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
for a 30,904 square-foot retail center. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-13881) to allow 103 parking
spaces where 167 spaces were required in conjunction with a 30,904 square09/06/06
foot retail center. The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-13881) to allow a 20-foot
residential adjacently setback where 70.75 feet was required in conjunction
with a 30,904 square-foot retail center The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial.

03/31/10
YK
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)

A building permit (#7001538) was issued for a building shell at 546 North
Eastern Avenue. The permit was finalized on 01/03/08.
05/08/07
A building permit (#7001536) was issued for on-site improvements at 546
North Eastern Avenue. The permit expired on 11/10/07.
A building permit (#105060) was issued for a Non-Work Certificate of
Occupancy at 546 North Eastern Avenue, Suite #130. The permit was
01/03/08
finalized on 02/13/08.
A business license (T07-95942) was issued for a Ticket Sales business at 546
08/12/13
North Eastern, Suite #130. The business was marked as inactive on 09/12/14.
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a Special Use
04/08/15
Permit for a Bailbond Service use at 546 North Eastern Avenue, Suite #130.
No issues were noted.
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one approved.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff visited the site and found a well maintained in line shopping center. No
issues were noted.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.05
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
General Retail
North
General Retail
General Retail
South
Multi-family
Residential
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
M (Medium Density
Residential)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
YK
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)
Surrounding
Property
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single-Family,
Detached
General Retail
Planned or Special
M (Medium Density
Residential)
SC (Service
Commercial)

R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Eastern Avenue
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
100
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
30,904 SF
1/250 SF
124
Center
124
107
Y*
119
5
103
4
Y*
Loading
2
Y*
Spaces
*VAR-13881 approved 103 parking spaces and 2 loading zone spaces for a shopping center.
YK
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)
ANALYSIS
The proposed Bailbond Service will be located in Suite #130 at 546 North Eastern Avenue that
most recently housed the offices of a ticket sales business. The property is parking impaired and
has an approved variance (VAR-13881) to allow 103 parking spaces, but the shopping center is
providing 107. The proposed Bailbond Service is a less intense use than the previous retail use
and therefore the parking is acceptable as it exists.
The proposed use as a Bailbond Service requires a Special Use Permit within the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zone. There are no special conditions or minimum requirements related to the
proposed use as a Bailbond Office.
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.18.060 the Planning Commission
and City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The shopping center is intended for commercial and retail uses. A Bailbond Service is a
commercial use appropriate for being located within a shopping center. There is no direct
pedestrian access to the nearby residential properties.
2.
The site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.
3.
The proposed Bailbond Service is located within an in line shopping center that has access
to Eastern Avenue, which is identified on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways as 100foot Primary Arterial. This road has adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
YK
SUP-59012 (PRJ-58746)
The proposed Bailbond Service is a state licensed business, and the site would be subject
to inspections. Therefore, it would not compromise public health and safety.
5.
There are no minimum requirements associated with the proposed Bailbond Service use.
NOTICES MAILED
185
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
48
YK
SUP-59012

Application Number:
PRJ-58746
SUP Bailbond agency
546 NORTH EASTERN AVENUE, SUITE 130
Project Name
NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS
13936110040
Ward #:
WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN)

Correct:
Yes

General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Select
Gross Acres:
Lots/Units:
NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS
NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS
Applicant Address:
4164 GRACE ST
Applicant City:
LAS VEGAS
Applicant State:
NV
Applicant Zip:
89121
Applicant Phone:
7025266037
Applicant Fax:
Applicant Email:
MARIARCARRANZA@AOL.COM
Rep First Name:
MARIA
Rep Last Name:
ROMERO
Rep Address:
4164 GRACE ST
Rep City:
LAS VEGAS
Rep State:
NV
Rep Zip:
89121
Rep Phone:
7025266037
Rep Fax:
Rep Email:
MARIARCARRANZA@AOL.COM
SUP-59012
6/2/2015 11:18:39 AM
Page 1 of 2

I Accept:
Yes
Yes
Owner(s)
ADDR1
ADDR2
PLAZA LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS

LLC
23945 CALABASAS RD #101
CALABASAS, CA 91302-1500
CLVEPLAN Applicant
Company
Title
Email
Rene Carlsen
City of Las Vegas
Sr Technical Systems Analyst
rcarlsen@lasvegasnevada.gov
Maria R Romero Sosa
No Drama Bail Bonds
Owner
mariarcarranza@aol.com
SUP-59012
6/2/2015 11:18:39 AM
Page 2 of 2
SUP-59012
SUP-59012
SUP-59012 [PRJ-58746] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS - OWNER:
PLAZA LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC
546 EASTERN AVENUE, SUITE #130
06/02/15
SUP-59012 [PRJ-58746] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: NO DRAMA BAIL BONDS - OWNER:
PLAZA LAS AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC
546 EASTERN AVENUE, SUITE #130
06/02/15
bA7
A7 7
b7
7777
777 77 7A7777777 77777777
777777777777 77777777b
7 777777 77 7977777977777
7
777
777
77A7 7
7 77

SUP-59012

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59027 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 1,711 SQUARE-FOOT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 112-FOOT DISTANCE
SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at
568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A (APN 139-36-111-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58965]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59027
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Financial
Institution, Specified use.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a
residential protected property where 200 feet is required and a 112-foot distance separation
from a similar use where 1,000 feet is required.
4.
5.
6.
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a 1,711 square-foot Financial
Institution, Specified use at 568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A. This application is accompanied
by two distance separation Waiver requests. The first Waiver is to allow a zero-foot distance
separation from a residential property, where 200 feet is the minimum required and the second is
to allow a 112-foot separation distance from a similar use, where 1,000 feet is the minimum
required by code. There are five similar uses within 1,000 feet of proposed location. In short, the
proposed Financial Institution, Specified use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious
and compatible with the existing surrounding land uses, as illustrated by the requested distance
separation Waivers and the five existing Financial Institution, Specified uses within 1,000-foot
radius of the subject location. Staff recommends denial of the requested Special Use Permit.
ISSUES
x
x
x
The Financial Institution Specified Use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver is required to allow a distance separation of zero feet from a residential property
where 200 feet is the minimum required. Staff does not support this distance separation
Waiver.
A Waiver is required to allow a distance separation of 112 feet from a similar use where
1,000 feet is the minimum required. Staff does not support this distance separation Waiver.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for the Reclassification
of property and Plot Plan Review (Z-0061-75) from R-E (Residence Estates)
to C-1 (Limited Commercial) with the proposed use of a Neighborhood
06/16/76
Shopping Center on a property located southeast of Bonanza Road and
Eastern Avenue extending south along Eastern Avenue and east along
Bonanza Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
The Board of City Commissioners approved an Extension of Time request (Z0061-75) for the Rezoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited
06/01/77
Commercial) and Plot Plan Review for a Neighborhood Shopping Center for
the property located southeast of Bonanza Road and Eastern Avenue. The
Planning Commission recommended approval.
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

The Board of City Commissioners approved an Extension of Time request, a
Revised Plot Plan Review, Tentative Map and Final Map (Z-0061-75) for a
11/30/77
Neighborhood Shopping Center that is a commercial condominium
development located on the southeast corner of Eastern Avenue and Bonanza
Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
A Final Map (Book 21 Page 26 of Plats) for the Bonanza East Condominium
01/06/78
Commercial Subdivision was recorded. This created Lot 5, for which the
distance separation for this application is measured.
06/26/03
1970s
The shopping center was constructed.
A building permit (#2016321) was issued for a tenant improvement at 568
09/10/02
North Eastern Avenue, Suite A. The permit expired on 03/15/03.
A business license (N02-00045) was issued for a Non-Depository Lender at
03/01/01
556 North Eastern Avenue, Suite D. The license is active as of 05/12/15.
A business license (N02-00064) was issued for a Non-Depository Lender at
10/24/03
550 North Eastern Avenue. The license is active as of 05/12/15.
A business license (G63-01551) for a Finance Company has been applied for;
02/27/07
however, the license has not been issued as of 05/18/15.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants representative. The
attendees discussed the Special Use Permit submittal requirements for a
04/20/15
Financial, Institution, Specified use at 568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A.
Field Check
4/30/15
A field check was conducted on the subject site, which revealed that the suite
was vacant, the Shopping Center is under construction and free of trash;
however, a number of business have unpermitted temporary signage. A
complaint was forwarded to Code Enforcement on 05/05/15 for non-permitted
signage in the Shopping Center.

Site Area
Net Acres
8.75
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Shopping Center
Other Than Listed
Utility Installation,
Other Than Listed
Shopping Center
East
Garden Supply/Plant
Nursery
Multi-Family
Residential
West
Shopping Center
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-V (Civic)
SC (Service
Commercial)
SC (Service
Commercial)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-3 (Medium-Low
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
79,500 SF
1:250
318
Center
318
355
Y
310
8
335
20
Y
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
ANALYSIS
The Financial Institution, Specified use is defined as:
Any business whose primary function is to:
1. Lend money;
2. Cash checks or other negotiable instruments for a fee, service charge or other
consideration; or
3. Provide funds in exchange for the acceptance of a check on a post-dated or deferred
deposit basis.
This use includes without limitation a business that provides check cashing, services as a
principal service offered, a paycheck advance service, and any business primarily
providing cash loans, installment loans or cash advances. The term does not include a
pawn shop or a limited check cashing service, as described in this Section.
The proposed use meets the definition as the applicants primary business will be installment
loans and/or cash advances.
1. * The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title6.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as this use will be subject to regular
inspections through the licensing review process.
2. * The building design and color scheme shall be subject to review by the Department to
ensure that it will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.
The proposed use meets this standard, as the use will be located in an existing retail
building and any alterations require a building permit.
3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.08.120 (G)) such as balloons, inflated
devices, searchlights, pennants, portable billboards, portable signs, streamers, trucks
parked for signage purposes, or other similar devices are permitted, except that banners
announcing a grand opening or that a business is coming soon may be approved
administratively for a period not to exceed 30 days.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as the existing location is vacant and any
sign or temporary signs require a permit.
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
4. Window signs shall not: (a) Cover more than 20 percent of the area of all exterior
windows; (b) Include flashing lights or neon lighting; or (c) Include any text other than
text that indicates the hours of operation and whether the business is open or closed.
The proposed use meets this condition, as the proposed location is vacant and will have a
number of inspections throughout the building permit and business licensing process.
Additionally, the site will undergo ongoing annual inspections through licensing.
5. The hours of operation shall not extend beyond the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Per justification letter dated stamped 05/11/15, this requirement will be met, as this
location will operate between the hours of 8 a.m. and 11 p.m.
6. The building or portion thereof that is dedicated to the use shall have a minimum size of
1500 square feet, and shall be designed to have sufficient interior space to provide for
adequate customer waiting areas, customer queuing, and transaction space (such as
teller windows or desks).
The requirement will be met, for the proposed location will be 1,711 square feet per floor
plan date stamped 04/23/15.
7. No specified financial institution use may be located closer than 200 feet from any parcel
used or zoned for residential use. In addition, no specified financial institution use may be
located closer than 1,000 feet from any other specified financial institution use, auto title
loan use, or auto pawn use. For purposes of this Requirement 7, distances shall be
measured in a straight line from property line to property line, without regard to
intervening obstacles. The term property line refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and not leasehold parcels.
This requirement is not met, as there are two requested distance separation Waivers. The
first Waiver is to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a residential use where 200
feet is required, and the second request is to allow a 112-foot distance separation from a
similar use where 1,000 feet is required.
The proposed location of this use fails to comply with the minimum distance separation
requirements for the requested Special Use Permit. From the condominium parcel, the proposed
zero-foot residential distance separation Waiver represents a 100% reduction from the required
200-foot separation mandated by Title 19. The 112-foot distance separation Waiver from a
similar use represents approximately an 88% distance reduction from the 1,000 feet mandated by
Title 19. There are five, Financial Institution, Specified uses within 1,000 feet of the location
and the addition of one more may be the saturation point.
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
This application has been properly noticed and the Las Vegas Valley Water District returned the
comment below. This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but the existing fire line does not
have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Installation of backflow
prevention is required at this time.
In summation, the required Waivers and the existing five cash businesses within 1,000 feet of the
site reinforce the unsuitability of this site for the Financial Institution, Specified use with the
surrounding neighborhood. This use cannot be conducted in a harmonious and compatible
manner with the existing neighborhood and surrounding land use. For these reasons, staff
recommends denial of this Special Use Permit.
1.
The proposed Financial Institution, Specified use is compatible with the SC (Service
Commercial) General Plan land use designation and is located within an existing shopping
center. However, the proposed use requires a Waiver of the residential distance separation
requirement and a distance separation Waiver from five similar uses, which reinforces the
unsuitability of this site for the proposed Financial Institution, Specified use. The use
cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious or compatible with the surrounding
uses.
2.
The proposed development will be located within an established shopping center that has
ample parking and adequate vehicular circulation for the proposed use. The site can
physically support the Financial Institution, Specified use and a variety of other uses such
as administrative offices and general retail uses; however, the requested distance
separation Waivers highlight the unsuitability of the proposed Financial Institution,
Specified use for this location.
3.
Primary site access is from Bonanza Road and Eastern Avenue. Both roadways are a 100foot wide Primary Arterials with adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
MR
SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)
4.
General Plan.
The proposed Financial Institution, Specified will be subject to regular inspections by
regulatory agencies for business licensing and therefore will not compromise the public
health, safety and welfare, or the overall objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The use does not comply with the minimum distance separation requirement required per
Title 19.12, as two Waivers are required for the approval of this application (residential
distance separation Waiver and a similar use Waiver). Staff does not support the requested
Waivers.
NOTICES MAILED
82
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
46
MR
SUP-59027
b777A7
A77
A77
777AbA77b
A77
77A7A77A
77
777A7A77A
A777
77
A777b
77A77
b
7777
777777
7777
777
7A
7
A7
A777
A777
A7A7
7777
A7b7
7b
A77
bA
A77
A77
A77
A77
777
777
7A7
77777
7b7
77
77
77
77
77
SUP-59027
77 7
777
b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777C7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
C77
7A
7777b7
777
A7
77777b7
7777
A7A77
bA7A7
b7
7b7
b7777
777A7
A77
7b7
7A7 C
SUP-59027
77 7
777
SUP-59027
SUP-59027
SUP-59027
SUP-59027 [PRJ-58965] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC
568 NORTH EASTERN AVENUE, SUITE A
04/30/15
SUP-59027 - REVISED
SUP-59027 - REVISED
SUP-59027 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59032 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN OWNER: CHARLESTON PLAZA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,192 SQUARE-FOOT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED
USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 975-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 1814 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02-510-012), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58964]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: CHARLESTON PLAZA,
LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59032
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Financial
Institution, Specified use.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a
residential protected property where 200 feet is required and a 975-foot distance separation
from a similar use where 1,000 feet is required.
4.
5.
6.
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a Financial Institution, Specified use within a vacant 2,192 squarefoot tenant space at 1814 East Charleston Boulevard. The building is located on a 0.80-acre
portion of a 22.67 acre site. The site is a Shopping Center within a C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. Two distance separation Waivers accompany this application. The first Waiver is
to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a residential property, where 200 feet is the
minimum required and the second is to allow a 975-foot distance separation from a similar use
where 1,000 feet is required. The proposed use cannot be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with the existing surrounding land uses, as the required distance
separation Waivers reinforces the unsuitability of the proposed Financial Institution, Specified
use at this location. Staff recommends denial of the requested Special Use Permit.
ISSUES
x
x
x
A Financial Institution, Specified use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver is needed to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a residential use where 200
feet is required.
A Waiver is needed to allow a 975-foot distance separation from another Financial
Institution, Specified where 1,000 is required.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for the Reclassification
of the Property and Plot Plan Review (Z-0002-56) from R-1 (Single-Family
Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) with the proposed use of a
04/04/56
Commercial Center on the southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and
Burnham Avenue.
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0002-56) for the
remodel and expansion of the existing Charleston Plaza Shopping Center
07/14/88
located on the southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Burnham
Avenue. Staff recommended approval.
A Final Map (Book 43 Page 85 of Plats) for the Charleston Plaza Mall (A
09/15/89
Commercial Subdivision) was recorded. This map created Lot 4, from which
the distance separation for this application is measured.
The City Council denied a Special Use Permit (SUP-10209) for a Financial
Institution, Specified use at 1720 East Charleston Boulevard, Suite G01 and
02/15/06
G02.
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)

04/22/04

1988
The shopping center was constructed.
A building permit (#94327641) for a tenant improvement was issued at 1814
04/19/94
East Charleston Boulevard. The permit was not finalized.
A business license (G63-00867) application for a Finance Company at 1814
East Charleston was applied for; however, the license has not been issued as
02/05/15
of 05/27/15.
04/20/15
Financial Institution, Specified use at 1814 East Charleston Avenue.
Field Check
04/30/15
A field check was conducted on the subject site and revealed that the suite
was vacant; however, there are a number of non-permitted banners in the
Shopping Center. A complaint was forwarded to Code Enforcement on May
5, 2015.

Site Area
Net Acres
22.67
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Shopping Center
C (Commercial)
Genera Retail Store,

Other Than Listed
C (Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
Surrounding
Property
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Multi-Family
C (Commercial)
Single-Family,
Detached
Genera Retail Store,
Other Than Listed
L (Low Density
Residential)
Shopping Center
C (Commercial)
C (Commercial)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-1(Single Family
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Shopping
Center
307,518
1:250
1,230
Parking
N/A
-114
impairment
1,116*
1,152
Y
1,093
23
1,129
23
Y
* The site is parking impaired as detailed in Title 19.18.030 (D). Parking required for this site
was determined to be 1,116 parking spaces per Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-0002-56).
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
Waivers
Requirement
A 200-foot minimum separation
distance is required from any
residentially zoned property.
A 1,000-foot minimum
separation distance is required
from any similar use
Request
separation distance
from a residentially
zoned property.
To allow a 975-foot
separation from an
existing Financial
Institution, Specified.
Denial
Denial
ANALYSIS
The Financial Institution, Specified use is defined as:
Any business whose primary function is to:
1. Lend money;
2. Cash checks or other negotiable instruments for a fee, service charge or other
consideration; or
3. Provide funds in exchange for the acceptance of a check on a post-dated or deferred
deposit basis.
This use includes without limitation a business that provides check cashing, services as a
principal service offered, a paycheck advance service, and any business primarily
providing cash loans, installment loans or cash advances. The term does not include a
pawn shop or a limited check cashing service, as described in this Section.
The proposed use meets the definition as the applicants primary business will be installment
loans and/or cash advances.
1. * The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as this use will be subject to regular
inspections through the licensing review process.
2. * The building design and color scheme shall be subject to review by the Department to
ensure that it will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
The proposed use meets this standard, as the use will be located in an existing retail
building and any alterations require a building permit.
3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.08.120 (G)) such as balloons, inflated
devices, searchlights, pennants, portable billboards, portable signs, streamers, trucks
parked for signage purposes, or other similar devices are permitted, except that banners
announcing a grand opening or that a business is coming soon may be approved
administratively for a period not to exceed 30 days.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as the existing location is vacant and any
sign or temporary signs require a permit.
4. Window signs shall not: (a) Cover more than 20 percent of the area of all exterior
windows; (b) Include flashing lights or neon lighting; or (c) Include any text other than
text that indicates the hours of operation and whether the business is open or closed.
The proposed use meets this condition, as the proposed location is vacant and will have a
number of inspections throughout the building permit and business licensing process.
Additionally, the site will undergo ongoing annual inspections through licensing.
5. The hours of operation shall not extend beyond the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Per justification letter dated stamped, 05/11/15 this requirement will be met, as this
location will operate between the hours of 8 a.m. and 11p.m.
6. The building or portion thereof that is dedicated to the use shall have a minimum size of
1500 square feet, and shall be designed to have sufficient interior space to provide for
adequate customer waiting areas, customer queuing, and transaction space (such as
teller windows or desks).
This requirement will be met, as the proposed location is 2,192 square feet per the floor
plan date stamped 04/23/15.
7. No specified financial institution use may be located closer than 200 feet from any parcel
used or zoned for residential use. In addition, no specified financial institution use may be
located closer than 1,000 feet from any other specified financial institution use, auto title
loan use, or auto pawn use. For purposes of this Requirement 7, distances shall be
measured in a straight line from property line to property line, without regard to
intervening obstacles. The term property line refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and not leasehold parcels.
This requirement is not met, as there are two requested distance separation Waivers. The
first request is to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a residential use where 200
feet is required and the second request is to allow a 975-foot distance separation from a
similar use where 1,000 feet is required.
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
The proposed location fails to comply with the minimum distance separation requirements for
the requested Special Use Permit. The zero-foot residential distance separation Waiver represents
a 100% reduction from the required 200-foot separation mandated by Title 19. Also, the 975-foot
distance separation Waiver from a similar use represents approximately a 3% distance reduction
from the 1,000 feet mandated by Title 19. The distance separation requirements from a similar
use and residential property were established to protect the general public and the requested
Waivers are too intense and inconsistent with the existing and surrounding land uses.
Per Title 19.16.110, The Special Use Permit process was established to ensure that a proposed
use is conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with uses located on the same or
surrounding properties. The process recognizes that, within a given zoning district, certain uses
may be appropriate and compatible in some locations but not in others. The Special Use Permit
process allows a site-specific inquiry into the compatibility of a proposed use at a particular
location, taking into account: the characteristics of the site and the surroundings; the relevant
zoning and planning principles; and the input of the Planning Commission, City Council and
other interested parties.
This project was properly noticed and the Las Vegas Valley Water District returned the
following comments: This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but the existing fire line does
not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Installation of backflow
prevention is required at this time.
In summation, the required Waivers reinforce the unsuitability of this site for the Financial
Institution, Specified use with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed use cannot be
conducted in a harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses or neighborhood;
therefore, staff recommends denial of this Special Use Permit.
1.
The proposed Financial Institution, Specified use is compatible with the SC (Service
Commercial) General Plan land use designation and is located within an existing shopping
center. However, the proposed use requires a Waiver of the residential distance separation
requirement and a distance separation Waiver from a similar use. The required Waivers
reinforce the unsuitability of this site for the proposed Financial Institution, Specified use.
The use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious or compatible with the
surrounding uses.
MR
SUP-59032 (PRJ-58964)
2.
The proposed development will be located within an established Shopping Center that has
ample parking and adequate vehicular circulation for the proposed use. The site can
physically support the Financial Institution, Specified use and a variety of other uses such
as administrative offices and general retail uses; however, the two requested distance
separation Waivers highlight the unsuitability of the proposed Financial Institution,
Specified use for this location.
3.
Primary site access is from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial.
Secondary site access is provided from Burnham Avenue, a 60-foot wide Minor Collector.
Both roads have adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed Financial Institution, Specified will be subject to regular inspections by
regulatory agencies for business licensing and therefore will not compromise the public
health, safety and welfare, or the overall objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The use does not comply with the minimum distance separation requirement required per
Title 19.12, as two Waivers are required for the approval of this application (residential
distance separation Waiver and a similar use Waiver). Staff does not support the requested
Waivers.
NOTICES MAILED
228
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
36
MR
SUP-59032
SUP-59032
b777A7
A77
A77
777AbA77b
A77
7A7bA7A
77
77A7bA
A777
77
A777b
77A77
b
7777
777777
7777
777
b777b
7A
7
A7
A777
A777
A7A7
7777
A7b7
7b
A77
bA
A77
A77
A77
A77
777
777
7A7
77777
7b7
77
77
77
77
77
SUP-59032
77A 7
777
b777A7
77777777
7777
77777
77777C7
77777b7
7777
777
777
777
77777
777777
77777
7777
77777
77777
C77
7A
7777b7
777
A7
bA7AA777b7
77A777
7A7bA7
bA7A7
b7
7b7
b7777
777A7
A77
7b7
7A7 C
SUP-59032
77A 7
777
SUP-59032
SUP-59032
SUP-59032
SUP-59032 [PRJ-58964] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: CHARLESTON

PLAZA, LLC
1814 EAST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD
05/05/15
SUP-59032 - REVISED
SUP-59032 - REVISED
SUP-59032 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59044 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TLVCR, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED
13,810 SQUARE-FOOT PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 18
Fremont Street (APN 139-34-111-033), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow)
[PRJ-59011]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: T-LVCR, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59044
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Package Liquor
Off-Sale Establishment use.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Municipal Code.
6.
No more than 10 percent of the gross internal floor area shall be regularly devoted to the
display or merchandising of alcoholic beverages.
7.
All beer and wine coolers shall remain in the original manufacturer's configuration intended
for off-sale resale.
8.
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Package Liquor Off-Sale use within a
proposed 13,810 square-foot general retail use (drugstore). The proposed drugstore and package
liquor Off-Sale use would locate within an existing Non-Restricted Gaming Establishment
(Casino) at 18 Fremont Street. The subject site is located adjacent to the pedestrian mall, known
as the Fremont Street Experience. On 05/07/14, the City Council adopted Ordinance #6320
which intended to add minimum Special Use Permit requirements to the Package Liquor OffSale Establishment and Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor uses. Specifically,
minimum Special Use Permit requirements would be added to prohibit Package Liquor Off-Sale
Establishment uses from locating adjacent to the pedestrian mall and limit Retail Establishments
with Accessory Package Liquor uses to locating within grocery stores and drugstores only.
However, upon adoption, the minimum Special Use Permit requirements were switched in error,
thereby prohibiting the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor from locating
adjacent to the pedestrian mall and limiting the Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment use to
grocery stores and drugstores. A Text Amendment (TXT-58497) is scheduled to be heard by
City Council on 06/17/15, which would remedy the error, if approved. The applicant decided to
proceed with the knowledge that the request did not comply with the intent of Ordinance #6320.
For these reasons, staff recommends denial with conditions.
ISSUES
x
A Special Use Permit is required in order to allow a Package Liquor Off-Sale

Establishment Use in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0100-64) from R-1 (Single Family
Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial) for
11/30/64
approximately 230 acres generally located on property bounded by Main
Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the
east, and Charleston Boulevard on the south.
The City Council approved Ordinance #6320 clarifying Title 6 rules regarding
the sale, packaging and advertising of alcoholic beverages by package and
05/07/14
off-sale liquor licenses on or adjacent to the pedestrian mall. In addition, the
ordinance clarified Title 19 land use entitlements for package liquor and other
off-sale liquor licenses on or adjacent to the pedestrian mall.
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)

The City Council struck a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-49539) for a
Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment use at 18 Fremont Street. The
07/16/14
Planning Commission could not reach a majority recommendation. Staff
08/04/14
c. 1931
The existing Non-Restricted Gaming building was constructed.
A business license (H06-00012) was issued for a Hotel use at 18 Fremont
c. 1931
Street. The business license was marked out of business 09/12/14.
03/13/13
18 Fremont Street. The permit received a final inspection on 05/20/13.
A business license (G50-94305) was issued for general retail at 18 Fremont
05/06/13
Street. The license remains active.
A building permit (#253217) was issued for two exterior wall signs at 18
05/21/14
Fremont Street. A final inspection has not been conducted.
A business license (P62-00199) was issued for a Non-Restricted Gaming use
at 18 Fremont Street. The license remains active.
08/02/14
A business license (P62-00198) was issued for a Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use at 18 Fremont Street. The license remains active.
A business license (G62-07505) was issued for a general retail use at 18
08/19/14
Fremont Street. The license remains active.
Staff conducted a pre-application conference with the representative to
discuss a proposal to locate a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package
Liquor Off-Sale use within an existing Non-Restricted Gaming Establishment
(Casino) at 18 Fremont Street. A discussion was held regarding Ordinance
#6320 in which staff required additional information to make concluding
remarks. Staff contacted the applicant on 04/23/15 and explained a Retail
Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale was not allowed next
04/22/15
to the pedestrian mall as approved by Ordinance #6320, but that the intent of
Ordinance #6320 was to allow Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishments and
not allow Retail Establishments with Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale uses
from locating next to the pedestrian mall. Staff advised the applicant to wait
until Text Amendment (TXT-58497) was heard prior to submittal of a Special
Use Permit. The representative decided to pursue the Package Liquor OffSale use instead.
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff performed a routine field check and noted a well maintained gaming
establishment.

Site Area
Gross Acres
2.1
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Gaming
Establishment, NonRestricted
Gaming
Gaming
Gaming
Sexually Oriented
Business
Gaming
Planned or Special
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan Central Casino Core
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District
G-O (Gaming Enterprise Overlay) District
Downtown Casino Overlay District
Live/Work Overlay District
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Main Street
Primary Arterial
Fremont Street
Pedestrian Mall
Governing Document
and Highways
Title 11.68
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
80
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Package Liquor Off-Sale use within a
proposed 13,810 square-foot general retail use (drugstore). The proposed drugstore and package
(Casino) at 18 Fremont Street. The subject site is located adjacent to the pedestrian mall.
The Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment Use is defined as An establishment, other than a
retail establishment with package liquor off-sale, whose license to sell alcoholic beverages and
authorizes their sale to consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked containers,
for consumption off the premises where the same are sold. This use includes an establishment
that provides on-premises wine, cordial and liqueur tasting if the licensee also holds a wine,
cordial and liqueur tasting license for that location.
1.
Except as otherwise provided, no package liquor off-sale establishment (hereinafter

establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church, synagogue, school, child
care facility licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
The proposed use meets this requirement as there are no protected uses within 400 feet
of the location.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in

GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line
of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be
measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and
does not include the property line of: a. Any leasehold parcel; or b. Any parcel which lacks
access to a public street or has no area for onsite parking and which has been created so as
to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement.
This requirement does not apply.
3.
In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in

size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line: a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
obstacles; or b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the
establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
4.
The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to: a. An

establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having
200 or more guest rooms having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or b. A
proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.
5.
All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC
Chapter 6.50.
A condition of approval has been added requiring compliance with Title 6.50.
6.
Except for a grocery store or drugstore as defined by LVMC 6.50.020 that contains not
less than 12,000 square feet of gross internal floor area, no establishment shall be
permitted on or adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.
The submitted floor plans, date stamped 04/23/15, illustrate a total gross internal floor
area of 13,810 square feet. In addition, the floor plans and justification letter detail that
the area will include a pharmacy and qualifies as a drugstore. Therefore, the proposal
complies with this requirement.
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
As proposed, the Package Liquor Off-Sale use adheres to all minimum conditions as outlined by
Title 19.12. However, on 05/07/14, the City Council adopted Ordinance #6320, which added
minimum Special Use Permit requirements to the Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment and
Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor uses. Specifically, minimum Special Use
Permit requirements would be added to prohibit Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment uses
from locating adjacent to the pedestrian mall and limit Retail Establishments with Accessory
Package Liquor uses to locating within grocery stores and drugstores only. In addition, Retail
Establishments with Accessory Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment uses would not be able
to locate adjacent to the pedestrian mall unless the associated grocery store or drugstore
contained at least 12,000 square feet of gross internal floor area. However, upon adoption, the
minimum Special Use Permit requirements were switched in error, thereby completely
prohibiting the Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor use from locating adjacent
to the pedestrian mall, regardless of size, and limiting the Package Liquor Off-Sale
Establishment use to grocery stores and drugstores. Furthermore, the Package Liquor Off-Sale
Establishment uses were prohibited from locating adjacent to the pedestrian mall unless the use
was located within a grocery store or drugstore with at least 12,000 square feet of gross internal
floor area.
The applicant approached staff at a pre-application conference on 04/22/15 with the intentions of
submitting a Special Use Permit for a Retail Establishment with Accessory Package Liquor OffSale use. However, due to the error, an application for a Retail Establishment with Accessory
Package Liquor Off-Sale use could not be accepted. Instead, the applicant is pursuing a Package
Liquor Off-Sale use, which must locate within a drugstore or grocery store with at least 12,000
square feet of internal gross floor area. According to the submitted site plan, floor plan and
justification letter, date stamped 04/23/15, the Package Liquor Off-Sale use would locate within
a 13,810 square-foot drugstore. However, the submitted floor plans indicate a 1,832 square-foot
lower level dedicated for storage, bringing the total internal gross floor area dedicated to the
drugstore use below the minimum 12,000 square feet.
A Text Amendment (TXT-58497) is scheduled to be heard by City Council on 06/17/15, which
will remedy the error, if approved. Staff advised the applicant to wait for the Text Amendment
(TXT-58497) to be heard prior to submittal. The applicant decided to proceed with the
knowledge that the request did not comply with the intent of Ordinance #6320, staff and City
Council. For these reasons, staff recommends denial with conditions.
1.
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
The proposed Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment will be located within a proposed
13,810 square-foot general retail use (drugstore). The proposed drugstore and package
(Casino) at 18 Fremont Street, adjacent to the pedestrian mall. The proposal does not meet
the intent of Ordinance #6320, in which Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishments would
not be permitted adjacent to the pedestrian mall. Therefore, the proposed use cannot be
2.
The proposed Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment will occupy an existing commercial
space and will not require any additional parking beyond what has been provided for the
existing gaming establishment and the proposed general retail use.
3.
The property is located on the northeast corner of Main Street and Fremont Street, a central
tourist area that are adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. In addition, the site is
located adjacent to the pedestrian mall.
4.
General Plan.
The use is subject to licensing and inspections by the City of Las Vegas in an effort to
protect the publics health, safety and welfare. However, the proposal does not meet the
intent of Ordinance #6320, in which Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishments would not
be permitted adjacent to the pedestrian mall. Therefore, the proposed use cannot be
5.
The proposed Package Liquor Off-Sale Establishment meets the applicable conditions per
Title 19.12.
33
GK
SUP-59044 (PRJ-59011)
NOTICES MAILED
144
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
GK
SUP-59044
SUP-59044
SUP-59044
SUP-59044
SUP-59044
SUP-59044 [PRJ-59011] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT/OWNER: T-LVCR, LLC

18 FREMONT STREET
04/30/15
SUP-59044
SUP-59044

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-59055 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RINCON DE
LOS REMEDIOS - OWNER: WETHERBEE PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED NIGHT CLUB USE WITHIN AN
EXISTING 4,680 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) at 923 North
Pecos Road (APN 139-25-601-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ58640]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RINCON DE LOS REMEDIOS - OWNER:
WETHERBEE PROPERTIES, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-59055
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** CONDITIONS **
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning (Z-0066-84) and Site Development
Plan Review (Z-0047-85).
2.
Prior to issuance of a full business license for the use, noise impacts to surrounding
properties shall be mitigated in conformance with the requirements of Title 9.16.
3.
There shall be an administrative review six months after the issuance of a business license
for the Nightclub use.
4.
Municipal Code.
5.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.
Municipal Code.
9.
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to add a Night Club (Nightclub) use to an existing 4,680 square-foot
Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use at 923 North Pecos Road. There are no minimum Special Use
Permit requirements associated with this application. The City of Las Vegas Ordinance 6143,
adopted on 05/06/15, introduced new regulations and requirements for a Nightclub use that
would prohibit this application from being processed, as the new distance separation
requirements from a school, house of worship, City park, child care facility licensed for 12 or
more children and single-family dwelling are not met. This application was processed prior to
the adoption of Ordinance 6143, so the new requirements do not apply and are presented for
reference only. The subject location has received three licensing complaints in 2015. Based on
the number of complaints received and the adjacent land uses the Nightclub use cannot be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with surrounding properties. For these
reasons, staff recommends denial of this application. If denied, the existing Tavern may remain
without live entertainment or dancing; however, if approved, subject to conditions.
ISSUES
x
The City Council adopted Ordinance 6143, on May 6, 2015 changing the land use regulations
governing the Nightclub use. The Ordinance redefines the Nightclub use, the zoning district
the use is permitted, the types of activities that occur, hours or operations, minimum distance
separations from protected uses and other regulations. The new regulations prohibits a
Nightclub use within 1,500 feet of a school, church/house of worship, child care facility
licensed for 12 or more and 500 feet from a single-family dwelling. Prior to the effective date
of Ordinance 6143, the Night Club use was permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district with approval of a Special Use Permit. There were no minimum requirements
associated with this use.
The proximity of residential uses to the east, north and west of this site must be given special
attention, given the impacts of the proposed use to surrounding properties. A condition of
approval will requires noise attenuation to meet the requirements of Title 9.16 of the Las
Vegas Municipal Code.
The subject site has received three licensing complaints from 02/04/15 through 04/29/15.
03/10/84
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0066-84) request from R-3
(Limited Multiple Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) with the proposed
use of a Convenience Store with gasoline and retail shops on the property
generally located on the north west corner of Washington Avenue and Pecos
Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
10/16/85
The City Council approved a Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-0047-85)
request from R-3 (Limited Multiple Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial)
with the proposed use of a Shopping Center generally located on the
northwest corner of Washington Avenue and Pecos Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (Z-0066-84) request the
12/18/85
property generally located on the north west corner of Washington Avenue
and Pecos Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment accepted a Withdraw Without Prejudice
request for a Special Use Permit (U-0102-96) for the On-Premise Sale of Beer
02/28/97
and Wine in conjunction with a proposed restaurant at 901 North Pecos Road.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0145-96) request to
11/26/96
allow 118 parking spaces where 130 parking spaces are required at 901 North
Pecos Road. Staff recommends approval.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (U-0150-96) request for the
On-Premise Sale of Beer and Wine in conjunction with a proposed restaurant
03/24/97
with a Waiver of the minimum 400-foot distance separation from a church
and park at 901 North Pecos Road. The Board of Zoning Adjustment
12/02/99
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-35857) to allow 105 parking
spaces where 113 spaces are required at 941 North Pecos Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
05/06/15
The City Council adopted Ordinance 6143 thereby modifying the land use
and licensing regulation for the Nightclub use.
12/26/08
1985
The shopping Center was constructed.
A business license (R09-01765) was issued for a Restaurant at 923 North
1985
Pecos Road. The license is active at of 05/19/15.
A business license (L16-00189) was issued for a Tavern at 923 North Pecos
03/21/90
Road. The license was marked out of business on 04/01/14.
A building permit for a restaurant bar and night club was issued. The permit
06/17/13
was finalized on 03/20/14.
A business license (L16-95947) was issued for a Tavern at 923 North Pecos
03/06/14
Road. The license is active at of 05/19/15.
A business license (P62-00276) was issued for Restricted Gaming at 923
03/06/14
North Pecos Road. The license is active at of 05/19/15.
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)

A business license (G62-03804) was issued for a Coin Operated Machines at
05/07/14
923 North Pecos Road. The license is active at of 05/19/15.
A business license complaint (#BLE1700) was received from the Las Vegas
02/04/15
Metropolitan Police Department that there are concerns with a key employee.
The complaint was resolved on 03/11/15.
A business license complaint (#BLE1980) was received for an unlicensed
02/10/15
business providing DJ and Karaoke services. The complaint was resolved on
02/10/15.
A business license (G63-01136) was applied for a Night Club at 923 North
02/11/15
Pecos Road; however, it has not been issued as of 05/21/15.
A business license complaint (#BLE8700) was received as the Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department issued a notice of Non-Compliance. The
04/29/15
complaint is open, as of 05/21/15.
12/26/08
Night Club use within an existing Liquor Establishment (Tavern).
Field Check
04/30/15
A field check was conducted on the subject shopping center, which revealed
that there are restaurants, general retail shops, an existing Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) and a house of worship uses. The shopping center is
clean and maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.15
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
House of Worship
Other Than Listed
Financial Institution,
Specified
Restaurant
North
Multi-Family
South
City Park
East
Single-Family,
Detached
West
Multi-Family
Planned or Special
M (Medium Density
Residential)
PR-OS
(Parks/Recreation/Open
Space)
L (Low Density
Residential)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)
C-V (Civic)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.08, 19.12 and parking Variance (VAR-35857) the following parking
standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1:50 SF of
Seating
Liquor
Area
Establishment
4,680 GFA
*52
1:200
(Tavern)
Remaining
GFA
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor
Area or
Use
Number of
Units
Required
Provided
Compliance
Parking
Parking
Parking
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
1 SP Per 3
153 People Per Persons
Night Club
51*
Max
at Max
Capacity
51
52
Y
7
3
47
5
Y
*VAR-35857 sets the parking requirement at 105 parking spaces for this site. The number of
required spaces for 923 Pecos North Road is 52 parking spaces. The Night Club use is one less
than required by the Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use. Thus adequate parking is provided.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Washington Avenue and Pecos Road
within an existing in-line commercial building. The site has an approved parking Variance
(VAR-35857) that sets the parking requirement at 105 parking spaces for the site. The parking
requirement for the Night Club use is one less than the existing Tavern use. The rules and
regulation governing the Nightclub use have changed from the time this application was process
to the time this application will be publicly heard. Approval of city of Las Vegas Ordinance
6143 changed the definition and Special Use Permit requirements for the Nightclub use. If this
application were reviewed by the new Special Use Permit requirement it would not be allowed to
be processed. Listed below is old definition and regulations for the Night Club use. This
application will be reviewed under the definition and Special Use Permit requirements in place
prior to the adoption of Ordinance 6143.
The definition and Special Use Permit requirements for a Night Club use prior to the adopted
City Ordinance 6143 are listed below:
The Night Club use is defined as An establishment, other than a teen dance center, that is
operated as a place of entertainment, characterized by any or all of the following as a principal
use:
1. Live, recorded, or televised entertainment, including but not limited to performance by
magicians, musicians or comedians.
2. Dancing.
The proposed use meets the definition, as the southwest portion of the tenant space is proposed
to be reserved with a stage and dance floor. There are no minimum Special Use Permit
requirements for this use.
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
There are two houses of worship within 1,500 feet of the proposed use, with one in the same
retail center. There are two schools within 1,500 feet of the site with the closest 43 feet to the
northwest, a multi-family residential property is adjacent to the north and west property lines,
single-family dwellings 100 feet east of the site, a City Park is 100 feet to the south of the
property and a child care facility licensed for 12 or more children 1,424 feet to the south. City of
Las Vegas Ordinance 6143 prohibits a Nightclub use within 1,500 feet of a church/house of
worship, school, City park and child care facility licensed for 12 or more children and 500 feet of
a single-family dwelling.
The new regulations do not apply to this application; however, per Title 19.16.110 The Special
Use Permit process was established to ensure that a proposed use is conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with uses located on the same or surrounding properties. The process
recognizes that, within a given zoning district, certain uses may be appropriate and compatible in
some locations but not in others. The Special Use Permit process allows a site-specific inquiry
into the compatibility of a proposed use at a particular location, taking into account: the
characteristics of the site and the surroundings; the relevant zoning and planning principles; and
the input of the Planning Commission, City Council and other interested parties.
The current use of the tenant space is a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use. The site is within a
C-1 (Limited Commercial) District. The applicant has a business license that limits the night
club activities to less than 50 square feet of karaoke. The applicant would like that licensing
condition removed and conduct Nightclub activities (such as live and disc jockey music and
dancing). Per justification letter date stamped, 05/18/18, the Night Club hours of operation will
be from 9:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. Thursday through Sunday. Per floor plan date stamped, 04/23/15,
there is approximately 415 square feet of space dedicated for a dance floor and a stage. If
approved, the license will be issued under the new licensing regulations. A condition of approval
was added to ensure this occurs. Alcohol service and sales are not a part of this use as they exist
on site.
There is concern that there will be secondary impacts resulting from individual and crowds, loud
noises and alcohol in close proximity to residential dwellings and a City park. The applicants
justification states that three security guards (two armed) will be on premise. Also, that noise
reducers have been installed inside the suite and the doors remain closed. There is still concern
that unwanted sound could pose a nuisance to the adjacent properties and potential conflicts
could occur in the parking lot between Nightclub patrons and the apartment residents to the north
and west or the single-family residence to the east. A Condition of Approval was added to ensure
loud noises would be compliant with code. Also, a six-month required review has been added to
ensure the secondary impacts of the use do not adversely affect the adjacent land uses.
completed and distributed to the required departments and agencies. The Las Vegas Valley
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
Water District returned the following comments: This parcel is currently served by LVVWD
but does not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing
plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for meter sizing, available fire flow, and installation
of required backflow prevention.
The Nightclub use and associated secondary impacts is not compatible with surrounding land
uses. Staff recommends denial of this application; however, if approved it would be subject to
conditions. If this is application is denied the Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use can remain
operational, but no Nightclub activities can occur at this location.
1.
The proposed Nightclub is not compatible with the existing retail and residential
developments, as the secondary impacts (such as excessive noise and possible personal
confrontations) associated with a Nightclub use are too intense for the existing
development and the adjacent residential uses.
2.
The proposed development will be located within an established retail center that has
parking and adequate vehicular circulation for the proposed use. The site is physically
suitable for this use; however, the building is adjacent to residential dwellings on three
sides and a City Park on the fourth. The proximity of the Nightclub use with regards to the
surrounding residential and civic uses is too intense for this location.
3.
Primary site access is from Washington Avenue and Pecos Road. Both roads are 100-foot
wide Primary Arterials with adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
MR
SUP-59055 (PRJ-58640)
The Nightclub will be subject to licensing and regular inspection; however, the secondary
impacts associated with a Nightclub use could compromise public health, safety and
general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. Additional security guards or staff may
be required as a deterrent or to halt secondary activities that may occur outside the
building. Also, additional measure may be necessary in order to comply with the minimum
requirements of the Title 9 noise ordinance.
5.
At the time this application was made, there were no minimum Special Use Permit
requirements for the Night Club use in Title 19.12.
NOTICES MAILED
381
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
35
MR
SUP-59055
SUP-59055
SUP-59055
SUP-59055
bA7 77
7A
A7A7A
7b7A
SUP-59055
7A7A
A
7
b
b
b7A
A
AbA7A
A7
A7*
77777777777A7Ab
7*
77777777A7Ab
7A77
7A7Ab7
A7
A7
77
A7AA
7A
7AA
7AA
7AA
7Ab
A
A7*
bAb
A7
77b7A7A7A77
7AA
7b7
7
77
77
7
bA7 77
7A
A7A7A
7b7A
SUP-59055
7A7A
A
7
b
b
b7A
A
AbA7A
A7
A7*
77777777777A7Ab
7*
77777777A7Ab
7A77
7A7Ab7
A7
A7
77
A7AA
7A
7AA
7AA
7AA
7Ab
A
A7*
bAb
A7
77b7A7A7A77
7AA
7b7
7
77
77
7
SUP-59055
SUP-59055 [PRJ-58640] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT -APPLICANT: RINCON DE LOS REMEDIOS - OWNER:
WETHERBEE PROPERTIES, LLC
923 NORTH PECOS ROAD
04/30/15
7
777
777
7
7
A 7 7
b 77 7 7 7
7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7 ) 7
7 77
7 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 777
7 7 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 78 87 7 7 77 7 7 7
777 7 877 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
b 77 7 7 77 7 77 7 7 7
7 7
7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 77 7 7 7
77 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7

SUP-59055
777 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 77
77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 7
7 7 7 77 77 8 7 7 77
7 77 77 7 7 8 7 7 7 77

7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 787 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7
7 7 877 77 7 7 78 87
77 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7
87 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7
7
7
SUP-59055
SUP-59055

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAC-59208 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE
HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate
two five-foot wide public drainage easements located at 1961-1973 Simmons Street, (APNs 13920-301-007 and 008), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Supporting Documentation - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]
4. Photo(s) - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]
5. Justification Letter - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR
EVERYONE, INC.
CASE
NUMBER
VAC-59208
SDR-58932
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
VAC-59208
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be a 5-foot wide public drainage easement
located on Assessor Parcel #139-20-301-007 and a 5-foot wide public drainage easement
located on Assessor Parcel #139-20-301-008.
2.
Prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation, meet with the Flood Control Section of
the Department of Public Works for assistance with establishing finished floor elevations
and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any
building or grading permits, or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended. Required Public Drainage
Easements must be granted prior to the recordation of this Order of Vacation.
3.
All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application
are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an
Order of Vacation.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Conditions Page Two
4.
The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have
been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security
for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of
Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because of
technical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City rightof-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not
changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant
purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will
remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public
easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any
right-of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.
5.
All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of
all City Departments.
6.
If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of
Las Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval
will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.
Planning
1.
2.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan and building
elevations, date stamped 05/20/15, except as amended by conditions herein.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow a nine-foot wide landscape
buffer along the east perimeter where 10 feet is the minimum required.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow zero-foot wide landscape
buffers along a portion of the north and south perimeters where six feet is the minimum
required.
5.
An Exception from Title 19.06.040 is hereby approved, to allow 32 perimeter landscape

trees within the north, south, east and west landscape buffers where 42 trees are required.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

6.
Safety.
7.
8.
A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device.
9.
10. Prior to or at the time of submittal for any building permit, the applicant shall provide
written verification by the FAA and/or the Clark County Department of Aviation of the
following:
a. Record a stand-alone noise disclosure form against the land, and provide a copy
of the recorded document to the Clark County Department of Aviation;
b. Provide a copy of the recorded noise disclosure form to future buyers/renters,
separate from other escrow documents, and provide a copy of the document to
the Clark County Department of Aviation;
c. Provide a map to future buyers/renters, as part of the noise disclosure notice,
that highlights the project location and associated flight tracks, provided by the
Department of Aviation when property sales/leases commence;
d. Incorporate an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 30 decibels into the
building construction for the habitable space that exceeds 35 feet in height or 25
decibels into the building construction for the habitable space that is less than 35
feet in height.
11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
Public Works
12. A Petition of Vacation, such as VAC-59208, shall record prior to the issuance of any
building permits to eliminate any drainage easements conflicts with this site.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Conditions Page Four
13. In accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56, remove all substandard offsite
improvements, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting Current City Standards
concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent
with development of this site.
14. Driveways must be constructed to meet the intent of Standard Drawing #225 or #226.S1
with a maximum opening of 32 feet. Amend for ADA Compliance with the traffic engineer
approval. Egressing vehicles shall not back out into the roadway per Las Vegas Municipal
Code Title13.16.190.
15. Any landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
16.
Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance with
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of a
map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The two undeveloped lots total 0.48 acres and are located at the southwest corner of Coran Lane
and Simmons Street, approximately 250 feet south of Coran Lane. The applicant is requesting to
construct two 3,648 square-foot multi-family residential buildings, each consisting of four two
bedroom units. As proposed, the new 7,296 square-foot multi-family development does not
adhere to all minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19. The required landscape buffers
adjacent to right-of-ways are being partially provided. The applicant is requesting Waivers and
Exceptions to address the landscaping issues. In addition, the proposed multi-family structures
do not adhere to the minimum residential adjacency setback requirements. As proposed, each
multi-family residential building would locate on top of a five-foot wide public drainage
easement. The existing easements are in conflict with the proposed multi-family residential
development and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage patterns will be
created with the redesign of the site. The applicant has requested an associated Petition to Vacate
(VAC-59208) the two existing public drainage easements, which staff supports.
Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan encourages neighborhood
revitalization through infill development of two, three and four plex housing opportunities
through a variety of incentives including relaxation of setback requirements when offset with
enhanced landscaping. As illustrated by the requested landscape Waiver, the proposed
development is requesting a relaxation of residential adjacency setback requirements but is not
providing enhanced landscaping to help offset the issue. As a result, the development does not
meet the intent of Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. As such, staff
recommends denial of the Site Development Plan Review application. If denied, the requested
development could not be constructed as proposed and the subject site would remain
undeveloped. If the Petition to Vacate is denied, the easements will remain as currently mapped.
ISSUES
x
x
x
According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements may be waived

for any multi-family residential project that is intended to meet the affordable housing
objectives of the General Plan. According to the submitted justification letter, the
proposed multi-family residential buildings are designed for affordable housing.
The applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a residential adjacency setback of six feet
where a minimum of 67.5 feet is required.
A Waiver of Title 19.06.110 perimeter landscape requirement is required to allow a ninefoot wide buffer along the east property line where 10 feet is required.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

x
x
x
Waivers of Title 19.06.110 perimeter landscape requirements are required to allow zerofoot wide buffers along a portion of the north and south property lines where 6 feet is
required.
An Exception of Title 19.06.040 is required to allow 32 trees within the north, south, east
and west landscape buffers where 42 trees are required.
The existing five-foot wide public drainage easements, one on each lot, are in conflict
with the proposed multi-family residential development. As a result, a Petition to Vacate
is required.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a Petition to Annex (A-0012-80)
0.95 acres of property generally located on the west side of Simmons Street,
09/30/80
approximately 249 feet south of Lake Mead Boulevard. The annexation
became effective on 11/14/80.

03/18/15

A Civil Improvement Plan (#7946) was issued for eight houses at 1973
11/01/05
Simmons Street. The permit was finalized on 12/13/05 and expired on
09/18/11.
A building permit (#6004006) was issued for a single-family residential
structure at 1961 Simmons Street. The permit expired on 05/31/08.
06/08/06
A building permit (#79928) was issued for a block wall at 1961 Simmons
Street. The permit did not receive a final inspection.
01/17/07
02/01/08
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Staff held a pre-application meeting with the owner to discuss a proposal to
develop two vacant lots at 1961-1973 Simmons Street. The applicant
proposed two four-unit multi-family residential development buildings. Staff
concluded that a Site Development Plan would be required, as well as
03/31/15
Waivers for inadequate landscape buffers and residential adjacency standards.
According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements
may be waived for any multi-family residential project that is intended to
meet the affordable housing objectives of the General Plan.
Field Check
04/30/15
Staff conducted a routine field check and noted a vacant lot with a small
amount of trash. In addition, a half completed and abandoned CMU block
wall was noted along the north and west property lines. Chain link fencing
was noted along portions of the east property line.

Site Area
Gross Acres
0.48
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
House of Worship
Single-Family,
Detached
Multi-Family
Residential
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
M (Medium Density
Residential)
RN (Rural
Neighborhood) Clark
County
M (Medium Density
Residential)
H (High Density
Residential)
RN (Rural
Neighborhood) Clark
County

R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark County
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential) Clark County
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Master Plan Areas

West Las Vegas Plan
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
Min. Setbacks
x Front
10 Feet
x Side
5 Feet
20 Feet
x Rear
55 Feet
Trash Enclosure
Mech. Equipment
Provided
10,326 SF
15 Feet
6 Feet
20 Feet
22.5 Feet
Screened,
Screened, Gated, w/ Gated w/ a
a Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Screened
Screened
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Residential Adjacency Standards

Required/Allowed Provided
Compliance
3:1 proximity slope
67.5 Feet
6 Feet
N*
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
52 Feet
Y
*According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements may be waived for
any multi-family residential project that is intended to meet the affordable housing objectives of
the General Plan. According to the submitted justification letter, the proposed multi-family
residential buildings are designed for affordable housing and the applicant has requested a
Waiver to address the residential adjacency issue.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:

Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
x North
12 Trees
8 Trees
x South
12 Trees
8 Trees
x West
10 Trees
12 Trees
8 Trees
4 Trees
x East
42 Trees
32 Trees
Parking Area Trees
4 Trees
2 Trees
Min. Zone Width
x North
6 Feet
0 Feet
x South
6 Feet
0 Feet
x East
10 Feet
9 Feet
6 Feet
6 Feet
x West
Wall Height
Not Indicated
Street Name
Simmons Street
Compliance
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N/A
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Local Street

and Highways
59 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1.75
spaces per
14
8 Two
unit
Multi-Family
Bedroom
Residential
1 guest
Units
space per
2
6 units
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
16
16
Y
14
2
14
2
Y
Waivers
Requirement
10-foot perimeter landscape
buffer along the east property
line
buffer along the north property
line
buffer along the south property
line
Residential Adjacency setback
of 67.5 Feet
Exceptions
Requirement
24-inch box shade trees per 20
linear feet within the north
landscape buffer (12 required)
linear feet within the south
linear feet within the east
Request
Nine Feet
Denial
Zero Feet
Denial
Zero Feet
Denial
Six Feet
Denial
Request
Eight Trees
Denial
Eight Trees
Denial
4 Trees
Denial
ANALYSIS
The subject site consists of two undeveloped lots totaling 0.48 acres located at the southwest
corner of Coran Lane and Simmons Street, approximately 250 feet south of Coran Lane. The
applicant is requesting to construct a two-story, four-unit multi-family residential building on
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

each undeveloped lot. The sites development is proposed within the context of an R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) zoned property along a well-established multi-family residential corridor.
The R-3 (Medium Density Residential) District is intended to provide for the development of a
variety of multi-family units such as duplexes, townhouses and medium density apartments.
The submitted site plan, date stamped 05/20/15, illustrates two identical 3,648 square-foot multifamily residential buildings, each consisting of four two bedroom units. The primary building
materials utilized to construct the two proposed four unit multi-family buildings are stucco,
smooth concrete block and wood soffit. The various materials and carefully designed variations,
patterns, jogs, and offsets assist in dividing the 22.5-foot tall building masses and create
architectural character.
Each multi-family residential building would locate on top of a five-foot wide public drainage
easement. The existing easements are in conflict with the proposed multi-family residential
development and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage patterns will be
created with the redesign of the site. The applicant has requested an associated Petition to Vacate
(VAC-59208) the two existing public drainage easements, which staff supports. As no right-ofway is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to
send this VAC request to the utility companies and franchise holders, nor wait for their
responses. Since only City easements are involved, any utility company interests will need to be
addressed with each respective utility company and will not be affected by the City vacating its
interest.
As proposed, the new 7,296 square-foot multi-family development does not adhere to all
minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19. The proposed structures do not adhere to the
minimum residential adjacency setback requirement. Although the proposed heights of 22.5 feet
are within the maximum height requirements typically allowed in the R-3 (Medium Density
Residential) zone, the subject site is adjacent to residentially zoned properties to the north and
west. As a result, the subject site is subject to Residential Adjacency Standards. As proposed, the
22.5-foot tall buildings would require a 67.5-foot setback to the nearest protected property, as
outlined by Title 19.08.040(H). According to the submitted site plan, each building would only
provide a 20-foot setback to the R-E (Rural Estates Residential Clark County) property to the
west where 67.5 feet is the minimum required. Furthermore, the northern most proposed multifamily building would provide a six-foot setback to the R-E (Rural Estates Residential Clark
County) property to the north where 67.5 feet is the minimum required. Typically, a Variance is
required to address a residential adjacency issue. However, according to Title 19.06.040(I)(e),
the residential adjacency requirements may be waived for any multi-family residential project
that is intended to meet the affordable housing objectives of the General Plan. According to the
submitted justification letter, the proposed multi-family residential buildings are designed for
affordable housing. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a Waiver to address the issue.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

In addition, the required landscape buffers adjacent to the right-of-way and interior lot lines are
being partially provided. Specifically, the applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a nine-foot
wide landscape buffer along the east property line where a ten-foot wide landscape buffer is
required. The applicant is also requesting Waivers to allow zero-foot wide landscape buffers
along portions of the north and south property lines where six-foot wide landscape buffers are
required. According to the submitted justification letter, the applicant is not providing the
required landscape buffer adjacent to Simmons Street in an effort to accommodate the necessary
on-site parking and vehicle circulation demands. There was no justification provided for the lack
of landscape buffers along the side property lines. As a result of the inadequate landscape
buffers, Exceptions are required to allow 32 landscape buffer trees along the north, south, east
and west buffers where 42 are required.
Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan encourages neighborhood
revitalization through infill development of two, three and four plex housing opportunities
through a variety of incentives including relaxation of setback requirements when offset with
enhanced landscaping. As illustrated by the requested landscape Waiver and Exceptions, the
proposed development is requesting a relaxation of residential adjacency setback requirements
but is not providing enhanced landscaping to help offset the issue. As a result, the development
does not meet the intent of Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan and staff
recommends denial of this Site Development Plan Review.
The Department of Planning routed this request for a Vacation and Site Development Plan
Review to outside agencies for review. The Clark County Department of Aviation responded
with the following comments. The property lies within the AE-60 (60-65 DNL) noise contour
for the North Las Vegas Airport (VGT). The subject property is exposed to significant singleevent aircraft overflight noise, and many aircraft are at very low altitudes above it. Future
demand for air travel and airport operations is expected to increase significantly. Clark County
intends to continue to upgrade VGT to meet future air traffic demand. Residential properties
located in the AE-60 in the City of North Las Vegas, City of Henderson, and Clark County
would require the applicant to:
x
x
Record a stand-alone noise disclosure form against the land, and provide a copy of the
recorded document to the Clark County Department of Aviation;
Provide a copy of the recorded noise disclosure form to future buyers/renters, separate
from other escrow documents, and provide a copy of the document to the Clark County
Department of Aviation;
Provide a map to future buyers/renters, as part of the noise disclosure notice, that
highlights the project location and associated flight tracks, provided by the Department of
Aviation when property sales/leases commence;
Incorporate an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 30 decibels into the building
construction for the habitable space that exceeds 35 feet in height or 25 decibels into the
building construction for the habitable space that is less than 35 feet in height.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Staff Report Page Nine
It is also advised that the Federal Aviation Administration will no longer approve remedial noise
mitigation measures for incompatible development impacted by aircraft operations which was
constructed after October 1, 1998, and funds will not be available in the future should the residents
wish to have their buildings purchased or soundproofed.
In addition to the Clark County Department of Aviation, the Las Vegas Valley Water District
responded with the following comment. These two parcels are currently served by LVVWD but
do not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. If the proposed
development will span over the two parcels, proof of parcel lot consolidation will be required
prior to obtaining service from LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to
LVVWD.
Finally, the Clark County School District submitted a School Development Tracking Form
detailing the closest elementary school, middle school and high school to the proposed multifamily residential development. The form also details the capacity levels for each school.
According to the submitted tracking form, Detwiler Elementary School is currently 51.81 percent
over capacity for the 2014-15 school year.
FINDINGS (VAC-59208)
The existing five-foot wide public drainage easements are in conflict with the proposed multifamily residential development and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage
patterns will be created with the redesign of the site. For these reasons, staff recommends
approval of the requested Petition to Vacate.
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.

The two proposed four-unit, multi-family buildings are compatible with the predominantly
multi-family residential uses in the surrounding area. However, there are two protected
residential properties to the north and west and the proposed height does not adhere to
Residential Adjacency Standards. Therefore, the proposed buildings are not compatible
with adjacent residential development.
2.
GK
VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

Staff Report Page Ten
The proposed development is not consistent with policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas
2020 Master Plan and does not meet minimum landscaping or residential adjacency
standards outlined by Title 19, as evidenced by the Waivers and Exceptions associated
with this project.
3.
4.

The primary access to the subject site is from Simmons Street, a 59-foot wide Local Street
as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The access points are adequate
to meet the traffic needs for this project.
The proposed building materials are appropriate for the area and for the City. However,
there is a lack of provided landscape materials, as evidenced by the requests for Waivers
and Exceptions.
5.

The building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are compatible with development in the area. The elevations provide a variety of
patterns of visual interest.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed project will not impact public health, safety or general welfare as the site is
subject to City inspections during construction, as well as routine business license
inspections for any commercial activity.

NOTICES MAILED
10 - VAC-59208
214 - SDR-58932
APPROVALS
0 - VAC-59208
0 - SDR-58932
PROTESTS
0 - VAC-59208
1 - SDR-58932
10
GK
VAC-59208
VAC-59208
9$& 6'55(96,('
5(&(,9('
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
77
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
77
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
9$& 6'55(9,6('
5(&(,9('
School Development Tracking Form
Real Property Management

4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89121
http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Date Filed 05/01/2015
Application Number PRE-58587
Entity
LV
Company Name Affordable Housing for Everyone

Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City
Phone
State
Mobile
Project Name
Zip Code
Fax
Email
Affordable Housing for Everyone
Project Description 1961 and 1973 Simmons St
APN's
139-20-301-007, 008
Student Yield
Elementary School
Single-Family Units (1)

Multi-Family Units (2)
Middle School
High School
x 0.195 =
x 0.102 =
x 0.135 =
x 0.135 =
x 0.056 =
x 0.062 =
Resort Condo Units (3)

Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Schools Serving the Area*
Name
Address
Grade
Capacity
Enrollment
Site Date
Detwiler ES
1960 Ferrell St
K-5
525
730
03/20/15
West Prep. Inst. for Acad. Excell.
2050 Saphire Stone Ave
6-8
1352
1326
03/20/15
Western HS
4601 W. Bonanza Rd
9-12
2776
2393
03/20/15
* CCSD Comments Detwiler ES is over capacity for the 2014-15 school year. Detwiler ES is 51.81% over capacity.
Approved
Disapproved
VAC-59208 and SDR-58932
VAC-59208 [PRJ-58587] - VACATION RELATED TO SDR-58932 -APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE

HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC.
1961-1973 SIMMONS STREET
04/30/15

04/30/15

04/30/15
9$&$1'6'5
5(9,6('

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-58932 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59208 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR TWO PROPOSED
FOUR-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF SIX FEET WHERE A MINIMUM
OF 67.5 FEET IS REQUIRED AND WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOT WIDE
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY
LINES WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 9-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.48 acres at
1961-1973 Simmons Street (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Protest Postcard

paper use, backup
SDR-58932
SDR-58932

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TXT-58648 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Chapter
19.16.180 related to Home Occupation Permits and to provide for other related matters. Staff
THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report
TXT-58648

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE
NUMBER
TXT-58648
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) **
1.
Subsection (G) of LVMC 19.16.180, Applications & Procedures: Home Occupation

Permit: Operational Standards is hereby amended as follows:
G. Operational Standards
1. In order to approve a Home Occupation Permit, the Director (or if appealed, the
Planning Commission) must be satisfied that the proposed Home Occupation can and
will comply with the following operational standards:
a. Only the occupants of the dwelling unit shall be engaged in the business activity
approved for the Home Occupation Permit at the property;
b. No employees shall report to work or be physically dispatched from the property;
c. There shall be no transacting of business or offers to transact business with
customers or clients who have come to the property except in connection with
a cottage food operation that complies with the following limitations:
i. Except as permitted as part of a garage or yard sale under
Subsubparagraph (ii) below, no more than two customers may be present
on the property at any one time;
ii. The outdoor sale of food items may occur with no restriction on the
number of customers present, but only in accordance with the garage or
yard sale provisions of LVMC 19.12.020(B)(1);
d. There shall be no signage or other advertising of any kind, whether on the property
or elsewhere, which advertises the address or physical location of the property or
identifies the existence of a Home Occupation on the property. A home telephone
number or a post office box may be advertised by any medium other than onsite
signage;
SS
TXT-58648
Proposed Amendment Page Two
June 9, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting
e. The following activities are prohibited as a Home Occupation:

i. No On-site motor repair, painting or body work pertaining to motor vehicles
or trailers. Mobile repair services are subject to the restrictions of LVMC
19.12;
ii. The sale or storage of vehicles by a vehicle dealer as defined in NRS Chapter
482;
iii. On-site commercial preparation of food for service on or off the premises,
except as permitted for a cottage food operation;
iv. business related to or involving The sale or storage of explosives,
ammunitions, or weapons firearms;
v. The sale or storage of tobacco products and paraphernalia or alcoholic
beverages;
vi. A beauty parlor or barber shop; or
vii. An ambulance or related emergency service services shall be permitted as a
Home Occupation;
f. A Home Occupation shall not create pedestrian, automobile or truck traffic in
excess of the normal amount associated with residential uses in the district;
g. A Home Occupation shall be conducted exclusively within the main dwelling or
within an enclosed accessory structure which has been approved for the Home
Occupation Permit, except for horticultural activities. No more than 25 percent of
the total floor area of all enclosed structures may be devoted to the home
occupation, and no more than five percent of the total floor area of all enclosed
structures may be devoted to the storage of stock in trade. No outside storage is
permitted;
h. No more than one passenger vehicle, with a maximum capacity of one-ton, and
one trailer shall be used in connection with a Home Occupation Permit. Vehicles
and trailers must be parked or stored to comply with the provisions of LVMC
19.12 Vehicle Parking, Storage or Repair in Residential Zoning Districts.
Vehicles or trailers designed and/or intended solely for a commercial use shall not
be parked or stored at the residence. Such vehicles include, but are not limited to,
tow trucks, dump trucks, buses, taxis, limousines, food trucks/trailers, ice cream
trucks/trailers, fork lifts, backhoes, concrete mixers and mobile sign trucks/trailers;
i. The number of on-site parking spaces shall not be reduced to less than two;
j. There shall be no outdoor storage or use of any toxic chemicals or hazardous
materials of any type or in any amount not normally found in a residential
structure;
SS
TXT-58648
Proposed Amendment Page Three
k. There shall be no electrical or mechanical equipment which is not normally found

in a residential structure, and no equipment found on the premises shall cause a
change in the fire safety or occupancy classification of the dwelling unit; and
l. No Home Occupation shall create or cause noise, dust, light, vibration, gas, fumes,
toxic/hazardous materials, smoke, glare, electrical interference or other hazards or
nuisances.
2. The following uses are uses that normally may be permitted by means of a Home
Occupation Permit if they can be conducted in compliance with the Operational
Standards in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection. This is not a comprehensive list but
should be used to establish appropriate types of uses for Home Occupations.
a. 800 and 900 number telephone services;
b. Accounting, bookkeeping, tax preparation or related services;
c. Appraisal, real estate or related services;
d. Architectural, engineering, general contractor or related professional services;
e. Artist, artisans, hobbyists, jeweler or related services;
f. Computer based businesses, desktop publishing, drafting or related services;
g. Consulting or related services;
h. Employment services;
i. Financial investment, brokerage or related services;
j. Handicrafts, gift basket assembly, floral, ceramics or related services;
k. Health fitness training services;
l. Home improvement and repair services;
m. Incidental office and telephone uses;
n. Information services;
o. Insurance services;
p. Interior design and decorating services;
SS
TXT-58648
Proposed Amendment Page Four
q. Legal, court reporting or related services;
r. Internet, mail Mail order and catalog services;
s. Mobile serve service businesses;
t. Network marketing services;
u. Janitorial, maintenance and repair services;
v. Party planning services;
w. Photography, video or related services;
x. Secretarial, typing, answering or related services;
y. Tailoring and sewing services;
z. Teaching or related services with a maximum of two students at any one time;
aa. Travel services;
bb. Vending machine businesses;
cc. Writers, authors or related professionals; and
dd. Cottage food operations.
3. Any Home Occupation Permit which is found to be similar to those enumerated in this
Subsection and which, in the opinion of the Director, is compatible with the intent of
this Section, may be approved or approved with conditions. If the Director determines
that a proposed Home Occupation would be detrimental to the public health, safety
and welfare or injurious to the existing land uses on the property or to the surrounding
properties, or does not substantially conform to the Operational Standards contained in
this Section, the Director shall deny the Home Occupation Permit.
SS
TXT-58648
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This item is for discussion and possible action to amend LVMC Chapter 19.16.180 related to the
operational standards for Home Occupation Permits and to provide for other related matters.
The City Council adopted Ordinance 4073 as the second amendment of Bill
1997-19, to add Title 19A to the Las Vegas Municipal Code for purposes of
establishing regulations and procedures governing zoning and land use
03/24/97
matters for the City. The standards and procedures for Home Occupation
Permits contained in Title 19 were revised as part of this document.
The City Council adopted Ordinance 6301 as the first amendment of Bill
2014-8, which updated the standards applicable to Home Occupation Permits
03/05/14
and established parameters for cottage food operations to be conducted as a
home occupation.
ANALYSIS
The intent of these regulations is to allow for operation of businesses from a dwelling unit where
the business owner resides without business activities being recognizable to the general public
under normal circumstances, including the adjacent properties. Only those persons living at the
residential dwelling unit may conduct business from that location. The primary use of the
property is residential, while the business use is accessory to the residential use. Occupations
that pose serious safety risks to neighbors are not allowed. Changes to the regulations are
proposed that clarify these assumptions about home occupations.
Motor repair, painting or body work on motor vehicles or trailers is currently prohibited as a
Home Occupation operational standard by Title 19.16.180.G(1)(e); however, Subparagraph
(G)(2) allows mobile service businesses to operate as Home Occupations. Furthermore, Title
19.12 allows (as a conditional use) the repair of vehicles in residentially zoned districts under
certain restrictions. This amendment would resolve this conflict by allowing mobile repair
services to operate as Home Occupations and clarifying that mobile services are exclusively to
be provided offsite and are not permitted to be conducted from the residential business address.
Mobile repair services must also meet the requirements of the Vehicle Parking, Storage or Repair
in Residential Zoning Districts use in Title 19.12.
SS
TXT-58648
The following clarifications are also made with regard to Home Occupation Permits:
x No outside storage is permitted in connection with a Home Occupation;
x Internet sales are permitted as a Home Occupation;
x Food preparation is prohibited except as allowed in conjunction with a Cottage Food
Operation as defined in Title 19.18;
x Storage of vehicles for sale by auto dealers is not allowed as part of a Home Occupation.
Currently, Auto Dealer Inventory Storage as a separate use in Title 19 is not permitted in
any residential zoning district;
x A Home Occupation may be operated from an enclosed accessory structure, but must
meet area restrictions; and
x While vehicles may be used in conducting a home-based business, those vehicles
intended solely for commercial use may not be parked at the place of residence;
No changes are proposed related to the processing or review of Home Occupation Permits.
FINDINGS (TXT-58648)
The proposed text amendment will achieve the following:
x
x
x
x
Clarify the list of business operations that are prohibited as a Home Occupation;
Resolve an apparent conflict whereby repair of motor vehicles was not allowed as part of a
Home Occupation Permit, yet vehicle repair in residential zoning district is allowed under
certain restrictions elsewhere in Title 19;
Clarify locational and vehicle restrictions for operation of Home Occupations; and
Correct minor syntactical errors.
The following table summarizes the proposed changes:

Code Requirement
Existing Regulation
LVMC 19.16.180 (G) x No repair, painting or body
Home Occupation
work pertaining to motor
Permit Operational
vehicles or trailers shall be
Standards
permitted as a Home
Occupation
x The sale of vehicles by a

vehicle dealer is prohibited as a
Home Occupation
Proposed Regulation
x Clarifies that onsite repair,
painting or body work
pertaining to motor vehicles or
trailers is prohibited as a Home
Occupation. Mobile repair
services are allowed subject to
the restrictions of LVMC
19.12
x Adds that Vehicle storage by a
vehicle dealer is also
prohibited as a Home
Occupation
SS
TXT-58648
Code Requirement
Existing Regulation
x No commercial preparation of
LVMC 19.16.180 (G)
food for service on the premises
Home Occupation
shall be permitted as a Home
Permit Operational
Occupation
Standards
x No business related to or
involving ammunitions or
weapons shall be permitted as a
Home Occupation
x A Home Occupation shall be
conducted exclusively within
the main dwelling or within an
accessory structure approved
for the Home Occupation
Permit, except for horticultural
activities
x No more than one vehicle with

a capacity of one ton shall be
used in connection with a
Home Occupation Permit.
x Mail order and catalog services

are normally permitted by
means of a Home Occupation
Permit
NOTICES MAILED
Proposed Regulation
x Onsite commercial preparation
of food for service on or off
the premises is prohibited as a
Home Occupation, except as
permitted for a cottage food
operation
x Clarifies that the sale or
storage of explosives,
ammunition or firearms is
prohibited as a Home
Occupation
x Clarifies that a Home
Occupation may be conducted
within an enclosed accessory
structure; however, no more
than 25% of the total floor area
of all structures may be
devoted to the home
occupation, and no more than
5% of the total floor area of all
enclosed structures may be
devoted to the storage of stock
in trade, with no outside
storage permitted
x Clarifies that only one
passenger vehicle and one
trailer may be used, and
parking and storage of vehicles
are subject to LVMC Title
19.12 regulations. Types of
vehicles prohibited from being
stored at a residence are listed
x Adds an internet ordering
service as a business permitted
as a Home Occupation
N/A
RJ only
SS
TXT-58648
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
SS

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.12
related to Permitted Uses to streamline zoning requirements and development standards for
various land uses, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
TXT-59132

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE
NUMBER
TXT-59132
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
RECOMMENDATION
**PROPOSED AMENDMENTS**
1.
Title 19.12.010 Table 2 (Permitted Uses) is hereby amended by amending the following
entries:
P P
C-M
C-PB
C-2
C-1
Automobile Rental
P-O
S P P
P
R-MH
R-4
R-3
R-2
R-TH
R-CL
R-SL
R-1
R-E
Assisted Living Apartments
Additional
Information
page 324
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment
S C C
C page 327
C
S S S S S page 331
C C C C C
Building Maintenance Service and

Sales
S P
C
Convalescent Care Facility /

Nursing Home
S S S S S
S S S
C C
Restaurant with Service Bar

Senior Citizen Apartments
Social Service Provider
Thrift Shop
C C
P P
P P P
P P Page 332
page 337
S S S S S S page 362
C C C C C C
S
page 365
C
S S S S S S page 370
C C
C C
S S
C C page 373
C C
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Two
2.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by amending the conditional use regulations and
minimum special use permit requirements for the Automobile Rental use as follows:
Automobile Rental
Description: A facility for the rental of new or used automobiles or other passenger
vehicles. For purposes of the limitations of this Title on outside storage, vehicles kept
on a lot for rental purposes are not considered to be outside storage.
1. The minimum site area designated for rental services shall be 25,000 square feet.
2 1. The installation and use of an outside public address or bell system is prohibited.
3. No used or discarded automotive parts or equipment shall be located or stored in any
open area outside of an enclosed building.
4. All exterior lighting shall be screened or otherwise designed so as not to shine
directly onto any adjacent parcel of land.
5. Service bays for repairs, installations, cleaning or gas dispensing services facing a
public street or a residential zoning district shall be screened to a height of at least 8
feet.
1. No more than 5 rental vehicles shall be stored on the site at any one time.
2. No vehicles shall be offered for sale on the premises.
3. No more than 5 rental vehicles shall be stored on the site at any one time. (C-1 only).
3. The installation and use of an outside public address or bell system is prohibited.
4. No used or discarded automotive parts or equipment shall be located or stored in any
open area outside of an enclosed building.
5. All exterior lighting shall be screened or otherwise designed so as not to shine
directly onto any adjacent parcel of land.
6. Service bays for repairs, installations, cleaning or gas dispensing services facing a
public street or a residential zoning district shall be screened to a height of at least 8
feet.
On-site Parking Requirement: One space for each 200 300 square feet of gross floor
area., plus one space per rental vehicle.
3.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by converting the minimum special use permit
requirements into conditional use regulations for the Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale
Establishment use as follows:
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment
Description: An establishment whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to
the sale of beer, wine and coolers only for consumption on the premises where the same
is sold.
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Three
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Conditional Use Regulations:

establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship,
school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is
closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the
property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The
distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For
purposes of measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee
interest parcels and does not include the property line of:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on site
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres
in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a
straight line:
obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.
a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with
a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor
space.
* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.
On-site Parking Requirement: No additional parking required beyond that which is
required for the principal use(s) on the site.
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Four
4.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by adding conditional use regulations for the Building
Maintenance Service and Sales use as follows:
Building Maintenance Service and Sales
Description: A facility or area for contracting services such as building repair and
maintenance, the installation of plumbing, electrical, air conditioning and heating
equipment, janitorial services, and exterminating services. The retail sale of supplies is
permitted as an accessory use.
1. No outdoor storage is allowed.
* 1. Accessory outdoor storage must meet all requirements of
19.08.040(E)(4)(e), irrespective of whether or not for purposes of
19.08.040(E)(4)(e) a Variance from its requirements is granted pursuant
provision and LVMC 19.16.140.
* 2. Accessory outdoor storage shall be limited to no more than 10% of the
area.
LVMC
LVMC
to that
total lot
On-site Parking Requirement: One space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area.
5.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by deleting the conditional use regulations for the
Catering Service use as follows:
Catering Service
Description: A service that provides for the preparation, storage, and delivery of food
and food utensils for off-premise consumption.
1. No more than 2 delivery vehicles shall be dispatched from the site.
2. The maximum floor area shall not exceed 2,500 square feet.
6.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by adding conditional use regulations and deleting
minimum special use requirements for the Convalescent Care Facility / Nursing
Home use as follows:
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Five
Convalescent Care Facility / Nursing Home

Description: A building or structure designed, used, or intended to be used to house
and provide care for persons who have a chronic physical or mental illness or infirmity,
but who do not need medical, surgical or other specialized treatment normally provided
by a hospital. This use includes a rest home and nursing home, as well as a use that
would qualify as a Community Residence except for the limitation on the number of
residents, but does not include an assisted living apartment, hospital or other
medical facility that is specifically defined in LVMC Chapter 19.18.
U through R-CL R-2 Districts
1. The minimum parcel size shall be 20,000 square feet.
2. The maximum number of beds per acre shall be 25.
3. Setbacks for buildings shall be the same as required for a single family dwelling in
the zoning district where located.
4. The maximum building height shall be 2 stories.
5. The facility must be located on a collector street or larger.
R-2 R-3 and R-4 Districts
1. The minimum parcel size shall be 10,000 square feet.
2. The maximum number of beds per acre of land shall be 50.
3. Minimum building setbacks and building height are as follows:
a. A one-story structure shall be set back a minimum of 25 feet from all property lines.
b. A two-story structure shall be set back a minimum of 35 feet from all property lines.
4. The facility must be located on a collector street or larger.
On-site Parking Requirement: One space for each 6 beds, plus one space for each
employee on the largest shift, plus 3 spaces for use by medical professionals.
7.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by deleting the conditional use regulations for the
Manufactured Home (Not Qualifying for Zoning Treatment as Single Family Detached
Dwelling) use as follows:
Manufactured Home (Not Qualifying for Zoning Treatment as Single Family
Detached Dwelling)
Description: A structure (as defined in NRS 489.113) that does not qualify for Statelaw zoning treatment as a Single Family Detached Dwelling. The fact that a structure
does not qualify for State-law zoning treatment as a Single Family Detached Dwelling
does not preclude it from being so treated for other purposes, or from being
permanently affixed to a residential lot.
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Six

1. No sales or display of manufactured homes is permitted, except for:
a. The sale in-place, by the owner or his agent, of a manufactured home that has
previously been located and continuously occupied in that mobile home park by the
owner.
b. The sale in-place, by a manufactured home dealer, of a manufactured home that
has previously been located and continuously occupied in that mobile home park by
the owner of the home and that has been taken as a trade-in or purchased from the
owner.
c. The placement of a manufactured home within a mobile home park for the
purpose of sale or display, or both, as a sales model only.
For purposes of this Conditional Use Regulation 1, a financial institution that has
succeeded to the interest in a manufactured home of its owner, through foreclosure,
shall be deemed to be the agent of the owner.
On-site Parking Requirement: Two spaces per site.
8.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by converting the minimum special use permit
requirements into conditional use regulations for the Restaurant with Service Bar use as
follows:
Restaurant with Service Bar
Description: A bar wherein alcoholic beverage drinks are prepared for service only at
tables in a restaurant and for consumption only in connection with a meal served on the
premises, and where customers are not permitted to purchase alcoholic beverage drinks
directly from the bar or for off-premise consumption.
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements Conditional Use Regulations:
1. No restaurant service bar shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of
worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is
closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the
property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The
distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For
purposes of measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee
interest parcels and does not include the property line of:
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on site
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Seven
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres

in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a
straight line:
obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed restaurant service bar which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line
of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel
in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for a restaurant service bar which
also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its
recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be
waived and the reasons in support of the decision.
5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 does not apply to an
establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection with a
resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992
* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.
On-site Parking Requirement: One space for each 50 square feet of public seating
and waiting area (including outdoor areas for seating and waiting), plus one space for
each 200 square feet of the total remaining gross floor area, with a minimum of ten
spaces required.
8.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by amending the conditional use regulations and
deleting the minimum special use permit requirements for the Senior Citizen Apartments
use as follows:
Senior Citizen Apartments
Description: An apartment house or other multi-family dwelling in which each unit is
occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older, or in which the units are
intended and operated for occupancy by persons 55 years of age or older. This use
includes an apartment house or other multi-family dwelling that qualifies as housing
for older persons under the provisions of Federal law, including without limitation
housing developments that:
1. Provide significant facilities and services specifically designed to meet the
physical or social needs of older persons; and
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Eight
2. Publish and adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate an intent to

provide housing for persons 55 years of age or older to the extent allowed by
applicable State or Federal law.
1. For any development that is over three stories in height:
a. The structures shall be compatible with the scale and massing of the types of
development allowed in the applicable zoning district and shall provide a transition
to less intensive development.
b. Rooflines and facade elements shall be articulated in order to break down the
apparent massing of the structures.
1. For any development that is over three stories in height:
a. The structures shall be compatible with the scale and massing of the types of
development allowed in the applicable zoning district and shall provide a transition
to less intensive development.
b. Rooflines and faade elements shall be articulated in order to break down the
apparent massing of the structures.
2. The use shall be developed and operated only in connection with ground-level
nonresidential development. In the case of a multi-floor structure, the apartments
themselves must be located above the ground floor, but access ways, entryways and
community rooms may be located on the ground floor.
3. The primary resident or guest entryway to the apartments must be independent of
ground floor commercial uses, and must be directly accessible from and oriented to a
street.
4. The overall architecture of the front elevation shall highlight the difference in uses
through variations in volume and proportion and shall be treated as a cohesive whole
through finishes and colors.
5. For any development that, in accordance with LVMC 19.08.050, is allowed to
exceed the maximum lot coverage provisions set forth in that Section, all landscape
buffer requirements, and all minimum setback requirements for the C-1 District, shall
be met.
On-site Parking Requirement: .75 spaces per unit (.5 spaces per unit within the
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District).
9.
Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended to add conditional use regulations for the Social
Service Provider use as follows:
SG
TXT-59132
Proposed Amendment Page Nine
Social Service Provider

Description: A facility that provides assistance to persons with limited ability for selfcare, but for whom medical care is not a major element. This use includes a facility that
provides assistance concerning psychological problems, employment, learning
disabilities or physical disabilities, but does not include a rescue mission, homeless
shelter or an adult day care center.
1. An interior lobby or waiting area shall be provided and shall remain open at all times
during normal business hours.
SG
TXT-59132
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT SUMMARY
This is a request to amend LVMC Title 19 for permitted uses and use regulations. The intent of
the request is to provide a more user-friendly zoning code for the general public and to
significantly reduce the time needed for approval of some uses by allowing them to be permitted
without first requiring approval of a Special Use Permit.
ANALYSIS
This amendment is to reduce the number of uses that require a Special Use Permit, and cleans up
uses that were previously reduced from requiring conditional use approval. The proposed
amendment affects the permitted uses section of LVMC Title 19.
Periodically, the Department reviews the Permitted Uses table to determine if there are any uses
requiring approval of a Special Use Permit that are routinely approved at the public hearing
level. This proposal would reduce the number of uses that require Special Use Permits based on
the following:
1. The evaluation of each use to determine if a Special Use Permit is still warranted. Some uses
which may have warranted a Special Use Permit in the past may no longer have the negative
secondary impacts that were previously present. This may be a result of the development and
application of more comprehensive planning techniques, better technology, increased
regulation of the activity (i.e. through the business licensing process) or the natural
maturation of the activity over time.
2. Allowing uses to be administratively approved within certain zoning districts, either as a
conditional use or as a use permitted by right, instead of requiring a Special Use Permit. For
several of the targeted uses, the minimum special use permit requirements have been
included as, or converted into, conditional use regulations to maintain certain standards and
protections that currently exist, such as distance separation requirements. These conditions
can then be verified by staff at the time of application for a business license. If the
conditions can be satisfied, the application is approved, thereby saving the applicant
approximately three to four months of time that a Special Use Permit would have required
for approval. If the conditions cannot be met, the applicant would then be required to apply
for a Special Use Permit and go through the public hearing process.
SG
TXT-59132
The following table indicates which uses are proposed to be amended:

Land Use Item
Current
approval
Level
Change approval
level to:
Current
Days for
Approval
New
Days
%
Approved
when No
Waivers
Total
number of
applications
2013-2014
100%
Automobile Rental
(C-1) 5 rental cars or
less
Special
Use
Permit
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
Assisted Living
Apartments
(R-2, C-1 and C-2)
Special
Use
Permit
Permitted (R-2)
and Conditional
Use (C-1 and C-2)
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
100%
Beer/Wine/Cooler
On-Sale Establishment
(C-1, C-2, C-PB, C-M
and M)
Special
Use
Permit
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
100%
26
Building Maintenance
Service and Sales
(C-1)
Special
Use
Permit
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
N/A
Convalescent Care
(R-3 and R-4)
Special
Use
Permit
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
N/A
Restaurant with
Service Bar
(C-1, C-2, C-PB, C-M
and M)
Special
Use
Permit
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
100%
Senior Citizen
Apartments (R-3, R-4
and C-1)
Cond
Use (R-3
and R-4)
Special
Use
Permit
(C-1)
Permitted Use
(R-3 and R-4)
Conditional Use
(C-1)
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
N/A
PC = Planning Commission
CC = City Council
SG
TXT-59132
Land Use Item
Current
approval
Level
Social Service
Provider
(C-1, C-2, C-M and
M)
Special
Use
Permit
Thrift Shops
(C-1 and C-2)
Special
Use
Permit
Change approval
level to:
Current
Days for
Approval
New
Days
%
Approved
when No
Waivers
Total
number of
applications
2013-2014
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
100%
Conditional Use
79 if PC
Final
Action,
98 if CC
100%
PC = Planning Commission
CC = City Council
In the case of the Building Maintenance Service and Sales use, the use requires a Special Use
Permit in the C-1 zoning district, but is permitted by right in all other districts in which it is
allowed. The minimum special use permit requirements only address outside storage as part of
the use where such is not normally allowed. This proposal is to change the use to allow it
conditionally in the C-1 district, with the added conditional use regulation that no outside storage
is allowed. If outside storage is desired or needed, a special use permit would be required and
the same minimum special use permit requirements that are currently applicable would apply.
As this use can be conducted in a limited capacity as a home occupation mobile service business,
the impact of allowing it conditionally in the C-1 district with no outside storage is minimal.
There are two uses that were previously amended from conditional use status to being permitted
by right: Catering Service and Manufactured Home (Not Qualifying for Zoning Treatment as
Single Family Detached Dwelling). This amendment would clean up and remove the conditional
use regulations from the use description section as they no longer apply.
FINDINGS
x
x
x
Reduce the number of uses that require approval of a Special Use Permit. This will
provide greater flexibility for applicants wishing to conduct business within the City of
Las Vegas, and will result in a more business friendly environment to promote
development within the City.
Reduce the time allotted for review of land use compatibility, allowing applicants to
obtain licensing and conduct business in a much quicker time frame.
Clean up the use descriptions by removing conditional use regulations for uses that no
longer require them.
SG
TXT-59132
NOTICES MAILED
RJ only
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
N/A
SG

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Title 19 to
revise the applicability and procedures related to review of Site Development Plans, and to
provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
TXT-59133

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: OWNER/APPLICANT: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION **
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
TXT-59133
** PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) **
1.
LVMC 19.16.100 is hereby amended as follows:

19.16.100 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
A.
Purpose
The purpose of the Site Development Plan Review process is to ensure that each
development:
1.
Is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design Standards Manual, the
Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards and other regulations, plans and policies
of the City;
2.
Contributes to the long term attractiveness of the City;
3.
Contributes to the economic vitality of the community by ensuring compatibility

of development throughout the community; and
4.
Contributes to the public safety, health and general welfare.
B.
Applicability
1.
Site Development Plans Plan Review Required. Except as otherwise

provided in this Subsection (B), a Site Development Plan Review is
required for all development in the City.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Two
2.
Exemptions. Except where the City Council or Planning Commission has

specifically reserved the right of review through a prior action, the
following activities and improvements do not require a Site Development
Plan Review:
a. Single family or duplex dwelling units, except as provided in Paragraph
(3) below;
b. Residential accessory buildings;
c. On-site signs, walls and fences;
a. d. Demolition of a structure;
e. Sculptures, fountains and other similar improvements;
b. f. Normal repairs and maintenance of an existing building or structure;
and
c. g. Activities and improvements undertaken in conjunction with a
Temporary Commercial Permit or Special Event Permit.
h. Alterations which do not affect the external dimensions of an existing
building or structure, unless the alterations are made to change the use or
type of occupancy within part or all of the altered building or structure.
3.
C.
Certain Conversions. The conversion of any development from multifamily or apartment development to condominium or co-op status shall
require a Site Development Plan Review.
Authority
1.
The Director shall have the authority to:

a. Determine whether an activity or improvement is exempt under
Paragraph (2) of Subsection (B) of this Section;
b. Determine whether a Site Development Plan will be subject to a major
review or a minor review under this Section; and
c. Approve or deny any Site Development Plan which requires a minor
review; provided, however, that final approval authority shall rest with:
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Three
2.
D.
i.
The Planning Commission, if the Commission specifically

has reserved the right, through prior action, to review and
maintain approval authority of any Site Development Plan;
or
ii.
The City Council, if the Council specifically has reserved

the right, through prior action, to review and maintain
approval authority of any Site Development Plan, or if a
member of the City Council requests a review pursuant to
this Section.
In approving a Site Development Plan, the Director, or if applicable, the

Planning Commission or City Council, may impose conditions deemed
necessary to ensure the orderly development of the site.
Design Standards
All required Site Development Plans shall meet or exceed the minimum standards
established in this Title. In addition, the City may adopt policy documents as a resource
for acceptable standards and design solutions. To the extent that such documents
establish minimum requirements and standards and are formally adopted by the City
Council, Site Development Plans must comply with those documents.
E.
Criteria for Review of Site Development Plans
The review of Site Development Plans is intended to ensure that:

1.

2.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the
Design Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other
duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;
3.

4.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Four
5.

features are not unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and
compatible with development in the area;
6.
general welfare.
F.
Minor Review of Site Development

1. Minor Review Decisions.
Site Development Plans requiring Minor Reviews may be approved
administratively by the Director. Minor Reviews include without limitation:
a.
Alterations which affect the external dimensions of an existing building

or structure that complies with all applicable requirements of this Title
and with any previous conditions or discretionary approval.
b.
New commercial or industrial construction of five thousand square feet

or less that complies with all applicable requirements of this Title.
c.
New residential construction consisting of no more than four dwelling

units that complies with all applicable requirements of this Title and is
not part of a sequential application for additional units.
d.
Live/Work units which comply with the provisions of LVMC

19.10.170, all other applicable requirements of this Title, and any
previous conditions or discretionary approvals.
e.
Residential to Commercial, Commercial to Residential, or Multi-family

or Apartment development to Condominium or Co-op status conversion
that complies with all applicable requirements of this Title.
2. Minor Review Process.

A Minor Development Review is initiated by the submission submittal of a Site
Development Plan Review application or an application for a Building Permit. If
submitted as part of a Building Permit application, issuance of the Building
Permit shall constitute approval of the Minor Review and no further action is
required.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Five
a. Building Permit Review. Minor Site Development Plans for the following
shall be submitted as part of a Building Permit application. Issuance of the
Building Permit shall constitute approval of the Minor Review and no further
action is required.
1. Single family dwelling units, duplex dwelling units or a MultiFamily Residential development not exceeding four units;
2. Residential accessory buildings;
3. On-site signs, walls and fences;
4. Sculptures, fountains and other similar improvements;
5. Patio Covers, Carports, and commercial Shade Structures;
6. Wireless Communication Facilities, Antennas, Satellite Dishes, Solar
Panels and Small Wind Energy Systems;
7. Alterations which do not affect the external dimensions of an
existing building or structure;
8. Alterations which result in a change of use or type of occupancy
within part of all of an existing building or structure;
9. Alterations which affect the external dimensions of an existing
building or structure, but do not increase the net floor area as defined
by Title 19.18.
b. Planning Application Review. Minor Site Development Plans for
development that is not listed in Subparagraph (a) of this Paragraph (2) shall be
submitted as part of a Minor Site Development Plan Review application.
3. Review by City Council.
Except for applications for Building Permit, The the administrative approval of a
Site Development Plan pursuant to this Subsection (F) shall be final action unless,
within 10 days following the approval, a member of the City Council files with
the Director a written request for the Council to review the approval. In the event
such a request is filed, the Site Development Plan shall be forwarded to the City
Council subject to the Major Development Review Process set forth in Subsection
(G) of this Section. Such a review may require a notification fee to be paid prior
to the hearing.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Six
G.
Major Review of Site Development Plans

1. Major Review. A Major Review of a Site Development Plan is required if: A
Site Development Plan shall require a Major Review and a public hearing when the
provisions of Subsection (F) cannot be met, or a determination is made concerning
any of the following:
a. The Planning Commission or City Council, through prior action, has
determined that the proposed project or improvement shall be processed as
a Major Review; or
b. The proposed development contains a building which is four stories or
greater in height; or
c. b. The Director determines that the proposed development could
significantly impact the land uses on the site or on surrounding properties.
2. Major Review Process

a. Application. A pre-application conference pursuant to LVMC 19.16.010(B)(3)
is required prior to submitting an application for a Major Development Review.
A Site Development Plan requiring a Major Development Review shall be filed
with the Department. The application shall be signed and notarized:
i. By the owner of the property, where the development is to be
undertaken by the owner or the owners authorized agent; or
ii. By a prospective purchaser or the property, where the property is owned
by the State of Nevada or the United States of America and the
prospective purchaser has:
A) Entered into a contract with the governmental entity to obtain
ownership of the property;
B) Provided to the Department a letter from the governmental
entity indicating that it consents to the filing of the application and
agrees to be bound by the application; or
C) Provided to the Department a letter from the governmental
entity indicating that it has no objection to the filing of the
application.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Seven
In the case of an application that is supported by a letter of no objection

under Subparagraph (a)(ii)(C) of this Paragraph (2), the applicant shall
acknowledge in writing by means of a form provided by the Department
or in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, that the processing of the
application is done as an accommodation only; that the application, the
results thereof, and any entitlements related thereto are dependent upon
the applicants obtaining an enforceable contractual interest in the
property; and that the applicant assumes the risk of proceeding without
any assurance that approval of the application will lead to an ability to
implement the approval.
b. Drawings and Plans Required. Plans describing the proposed development
of the property shall be submitted as required by the Director. Complete working
drawings are not necessary; however, proposed structures (including building
elevations), streets, driveways and access points, sight visibility restriction zones
(as described in LVMC 19.02.190), on-site circulation and parking, walls,
landscaping, building materials, dumpster locations and other improvements must
be shown. Preliminary drawings must contain sufficient information to permit the
determination of compliance with good planning practices, applicable standards
and ordinances. Floor plans are not normally required. For any development site
where twenty percent or more of the aggregate site has a slope of natural grade
above four percent, a cross section must be submitted. Each cross section must
extend a minimum project at each property line, showing the location and finish
floor elevations of adjacent structures; the maximum grade differentials; and the
elevations of existing and proposed conditions.
c. Circulation to Departments. After an application has been determined
complete, it shall be forwarded to interested City Departments for their respective
comments, recommendations and requirements.
d. Planning Commission Notice and Hearing.
After interested City Departments have had the opportunity for comment and the
Department has conducted its review, each application for Major Review shall be
presented to the Planning Commission. Notice of the time, place and purpose of
the hearing must be given at least ten days before the hearing by:
i. Publishing the notice in a newspaper of general circulation within the
City;
ii. Mailing a copy of the notice to:
A) The applicant;
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Eight
B) Each owner of real property located within a minimum of one

thousand feet of the property described in the application;
C) Each tenant of any mobile home park that is located within one
thousand feet of the property described in the application;
D) The owner of each of the thirty separately-owner parcels
nearest to the property described in the application to the extent
this notice does not duplicate the notice otherwise required by this
Subparagraph (d);
E) Any advisory board which has been established for the affected
area by the City Council; and
F) The president or head of any registered local neighborhood
organization whose organization boundaries are located within a
minimum of one mile of the property described in the application.
e. Planning Commission Decision.
In making its final decision, the Planning Commission shall consider the
recommendation of the City Departments, the evidence presented at the hearing
and the criteria set forth in Subsection (E) of this Section subchapter. The
Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an
application for a Major Review. All actions by the Planning Commission are
final unless:
i. An appeal is filed by the applicant in accordance with Subparagraph (f)
below;
ii. Otherwise required by prior action of the City Council; or
iii. In the case of Planning Commission approval, a member of the City
Council files with the City Clerk, within 10 days following the approval, a
written request for the Council to review the approval.
f. Appeal of Planning Commission Action.
If the applicant is aggrieved by the Planning Commissions denial of an
application, or by any condition imposed upon an approval, the applicant may
appeal the decision to the City Council by written request. In the case of an
approval, an appeal may be filed by any property owner within the area of
notification for the Planning Commission hearing, as well as by anyone who
appeared, either in person, through an authorized representative or in writing,
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Nine
before the Planning Commission regarding the application. Any appeal must be
filed in the Office of the City Clerk within ten days after the Planning
Commissions action. Pursuant to LVMC 19.16.010(C), the City Council may
establish one or more fees to be paid in connection with the filing of an appeal
under this Subparagraph (f), and the amount of any fee so established shall be as
set forth in the Fee Schedule.
g. City Council Notice and Hearing.
All Major Reviews requiring review by the City Council shall be forwarded to the
Office of the City Clerk and shall be placed on the next available City Council
agenda for hearing. The City Clerk shall mail written notice of the Council
hearing, at least ten days before the hearing, to the property owners who were
notified by mail of the Planning Commission hearing, or to the current owners of
record in case of properties whose ownership has changed in the interim.
h. City Council Decision.
In making its final decision, the City Council shall consider the recommendation
of the City Departments and the Planning Commission, the evidence presented at
the hearing and the criteria set forth in Section Subsection (E) of this subchapter.
The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application
for a Major Review. All actions by the City Council are final. Written notice of
the decision shall be provided to the applicant, agent or both. A copy of the
notice shall also be filed with the City Clerk, and the date of the notice shall be
deemed to be the date notice of the decision is filed with the City Clerk.
H.
Amendment to an Approved Site Development Plan

After a Site Development Plan has been approved, any request to amend the
approved Plan shall be submitted to the Department. Upon receipt of an
amendment request, the Director shall determine if the amendment shall be
processed is a minor or major change. as a Minor or Major Amendment pursuant
to Subsection (F) or (G) of this subchapter as appropriate.
1.
Minor Amendment
Minor relocation or reorientation of buildings, lot lines and/or easements,
relocation of internal access and circulation; relocation or rearrangement of
parking areas, reduction of established square footage and/or density
limitations, and increase of landscape or building setbacks are considered
minor amendments and may be approved administratively. However, the
Director has no authority to approve any:
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Ten
a. Alteration in the basic relationship of the proposed development

to adjacent property;
b. Change necessitating a waiver or variance of development
standards set forth in this Title;
c. Increase in the maximum density, floor area, or height by more
than ten percent;
d. Material decrease in the amount of off-street parking, unless the
amount of parking remains sufficient and conforms to the
requirements of this Title;
e. Reduction in the minimum yards or setbacks by more than 10
percent;
f. Material change in the characteristics of the elevation drawings so
as to alter the basic design quality and character of the proposed
development; or
g. Other material change that is not necessitated by the minimum
requirements adopted under the authority of LVMC Title 6, LVMC
Chapter 20.10 or the Uniform Standard Drawings, as adopted by the
City.
2.
Major Amendment
Any amendment which does not quality qualify as a Minor Amendment shall be
deemed to be considered a Major Amendment and shall be processed in the same
manner as a new Site Development Plan application.
I.
Revocation or Modification
1.
Notice. The authority responsible for the final approval of a Site

Development Plan may hold a hearing to revoke or modify an approved Site
Development Plan. In cases where the Director was the approval authority,
the Director may issue a written notice of hearing concerning a possible
revocation or modification of the Plan, or may refer the item to the Planning
Commission. At least ten days prior to any hearing, written notice of the
hearing shall be delivered to the owner, developer, or both. Notice may be
delivered in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
address shown in the records of the Clark County Assessor.
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Eleven
2.
3.
Grounds. A Site Development Plan approval may be revoked or modified

by the reviewing authority for cause, including a finding of one or more of
the following:
a.
That the Site Development Plan approval was obtained by

misrepresentation or fraud;
b.
That the development is not in compliance with one or more of the

conditions of approval;
c.
That the development is in violation of any State or local law,

ordinance or regulation; or
d.
That the time limits specified in Paragraph (1) of Subsection (K) have
expired.
Notice of Decision. Written notice of the decision shall be provided to the

owner, developer or agent. A copy of the notice shall also be filed with the
City Clerk, and the date of the notice shall be deemed to be the date notice
of the decision is filed with the City Clerk.
J. Expiration
A Site Development Plan which is not exercised within the approval period shall be
void, unless an extension of time is granted upon a showing of good cause. An
extension of time may be granted only if application therefor is made prior to the
expiration of the approval period. For purposes of this Subsection (J):
1.
The approval period for a Site Development Plan is the time period specified in
the approval, if one is specified, and is two years otherwise.
2.
A Site Development Plan is exercised upon the issuance of a building permit for
the principal structure on the site or, in the case of a residential subdivision, upon
the recordation of a final subdivision map.
K. Concurrent Approvals - Temporary Development

At the discretion of the City Council, a Site Development Plan may be approved,
concurrent with other development approval, to allow a temporary development to be
constructed without expunging or invalidating an active, unexpired Site Development
Plan, Special Use Permit or associated approval(s). For purposes of this Subsection,
SS
TXT-59133
Proposed Amendments Page Twelve
temporary development means development that is distinct from the long-term

development otherwise approved for the site and is intended as an interim use of the site
for a limited period of time. Any such concurrent approval for temporary development
is subject to the following requirements and limitations:
1.
Approval for a temporary development may be for a period not to exceed three
years, except as may be extended by means of one Extension of Time for a period
not to exceed three years. A request for Extension of Time shall be by means of
an application for Extension of Time pursuant to Section 19.16.260, and shall be
subject to review and approval by the City Council.
2.
No more than one temporary development may be approved for a particular site at
any one time.
3.
At the conclusion of the time period specified in Paragraph (1) above, including
any approved Extension of Time, the developer must agree to abandon the
temporary development in favor of the initial, unexpired Site Development Plan
approval. Otherwise, the original entitlements are subject to revocation as
provided for under Subsection (I) of this Section, and the temporary development
shall become the entitled development for the site. Notwithstanding the preceding
sentence, if an approval for temporary development under this Subsection (K)
included any deviations from standards, including exceptions, waivers, or
variances, the developer will be required to resubmit to the entitlement process for
approval of the temporary development as the long-term development for the site.
This requirement is in recognition of the possibility that 1) the rationale for
seeking and granting such deviations may have been that the development was
intended to be temporary only and 2) as a result, such deviations might not have
been granted otherwise.
SS
TXT-59133
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This item is for discussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Title 19 to revise
the applicability and procedures related to review of Site Development Plans, and to provide for
other related matters.
The City Council accepted and approved a report provided by Kirchoff &
Associates of the enterprise-wide development review process and procedures
used in the Departments of Building & Safety, Fire & Rescue, Neighborhood
01/20/10
Services, Planning and Public Works in order to identify area in which the
process can be streamlined and efficiency and customer service enhanced.
The City Council adopted Ordinance #6095, which amended Title 19 to revise
and update zoning-related application and hearing procedures generally, to
provide that Planning Commission action on most Special Use Permits is
06/02/10
final, and to provide a procedure for Required Reviews of approved zoning
applications. This amendment included clarification of qualifications for
minor reviews of site development plans.
ANALYSIS
A primary goal of the ongoing internal review of the Department of Plannings development
review process is to shorten the amount of time between acceptance of land use applications and
mailing of the final action letter. With regard to Site Development Plan Reviews, one way this
can be accomplished is to increase administrative reviews. Without the need for preparation and
scheduling for a public hearing, these items can be reviewed more quickly by staff and tend to
have few, if any, code compliance issues. This in turn increases the efficiency of staff review
and saves time for the customer. Statistical analysis of Site Development Plan Review
applications sent to a public hearing over a two year period from 2013-2014 showed that 98.6
percent were approved when no waivers or variances were needed, with no denials and one
application withdrawn without prejudice.
The proposed amendment attempts to clarify the process by which site development plans are
reviewed so that developments that meet all codes and previous applicable conditions can be
reviewed more quickly. The current structure is modified into a series of dichotomies that lead
to the most appropriate action. At the highest level of the workflow structure is the requirement
SS
TXT-59133
for a Site Development Plan Review for all development in the City, except for certain plans
deemed to be exempt from the process.
A site development plan may be reviewed by means of issuance of a building permit or by a
formal application for a Site Development Plan Review. The exceptions to this rule are
considered exemptions for which other processes (such as the tentative map/final map process)
are used to determine conformance. Both new projects and amended projects may be considered
minor or major, depending on the type and intensity of development. If determined to be a
minor review, the next decision to be made is whether a full application must be submitted or if
the plan check review for building permit can serve as the Site Development Plan Review.
Major reviews require a public hearing, which follows a separate process.
Beyond clarification of the process, the proposed amendment reduces restrictions under which
Site Development Plan Reviews may be administrative. Administrative reviews are usually
completed within 10 business days, as opposed to public hearings, which can take as many as 98
calendar days or longer, depending on delays. This text amendment would allow new
construction of any size development to be reviewed administratively if all applicable Title 19
requirements are satisfied and no waivers or variances are needed. Likewise, alterations to
existing buildings could be made to any building, regardless of size, as a minor review under
certain circumstances provided no waivers or variances are needed.
FINDINGS
x
x
x
x
Clarify the process by which site development plans are reviewed for conformance to Title
19 and other applicable codes;
Clarify when a project qualifies as a major or minor reivew;
Relax the restrictions by which site development plans may be reviewed administratively,
leading to greater staff efficiency as a result of both an increase in administrative reviews
and a decrease in preparation for public hearing items.
Increase the availability of administrative reviews under Title 19 so that the customer can
complete a project in less time. Furthermore, the customer would have an incentive to
comply with applicable codes, rather than request multiple variances and waivers.
NOTICES MAILED
N/A
RJ only
SS
TXT-59133
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
SS

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
DIR-59318 - DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY
OF LAS VEGAS - For discussion and possible action on a request for the appointment of new
members to the Downtown Design Review Committee. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
P.C.: FINAL ACTION
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION
None

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO, ACTING
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

06.09.15 Final PC Packet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

06.09.15 Final PC Packet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET PHONE 229-6011

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Todd L. Moody, Chair

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 2

EOT-59115 - EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER:

EOT-59116 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CONCRETE

EOT-59059 - EXTENSION OF TIME RELATED TO EOT-59115 AND EOT-59116 - SITE DEVELOPMENT

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

ABEYANCE - ZON-58533 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES,

SUP-59052 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59054 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 3

WVR-59161 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS - OWNER: DOCGORM,

SUP-58661 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO WVR-59161 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

VAC-58900 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: KAREN LIVINGSTON, ET AL - For a

VAC-59025 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS RESIDENTIAL

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

ABEYANCE - GPA-58199 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 4

VAR-59048 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59047 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:

VAR-59050 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: VICTOR HECKER, ET AL - For

VAR-59053 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHWEST SPECIALTIES, INC. - OWNER:

ROC-59056 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59053 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 5

VAR-59057 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CONCRETE SOLUTIONS - OWNER: JAIME

ROC-59058 - REVIEW OF CONDITION RELATED TO VAR-59057 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

VAR-58494 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: Y & B INVESTMENTS, LLC - For

VAR-59031 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59211 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CRAIG

SUP-59032 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER:

VAC-59208 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 7

Planning Commission June 9, 2015 - Page 8

Agenda Item No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 2.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 3.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 4.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 5.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 6.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

Agenda Item No.: 7.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 9, 2015

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.

City Council Meeting

City Council Meeting

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest