Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q8 IM09 Final
Q8 IM09 Final
To define leadership as the ability to positively influence people and systems under ones
authority to have a meaningful impact and achieve important results. Leaders create clear
and visible quality values and integrate these into the organization's strategy and structure.
To define Sustainability as an organizations ability to address current needs and have the
agility and management skills and structure to prepare successfully for the future,
including preparedness for emergencies.
To learn that the six key leadership competencies are: navigator, communicator, mentor,
learner, builder, and motivator. The competencies depend on a collection of personal
leadership characteristics: accountability, courage, humility, integrity, creativity,
perseverance, and well-being. They are reflected in the Leadership category of the
Baldrige criteria.
To study the leadership system and how leadership is exercised, formally and informally,
throughout an organization. These elements include how key decisions are made,
communicated, and carried out at all levels. The leadership system includes structures and
mechanisms for decision making, selection and development of leaders and managers, and
reinforcement of values, directions, and performance expectations.
To suggest that the Core Values and Concepts from the Baldrige Criteria are a useful
summary of the culture that defines a TQ organization.
To stress the idea that best practices are those that are recognized by the business
community to lead to successful performance. Some best practices are universal
including cycle-time analysis, process value analysis, process simplification, strategic
planning, and formal supplier certification programs. Others depend on a companys level
of performance. For instance, low performers must stick to basics such as process
simplification, training, and teamwork, while high performers can benefit from
benchmarking world-class organizations and using more advanced approaches.
To emphasize that all employees play a role in TQ implementation from senior manager,
who lead and provide resources, to middle managers who act as change agents and assure
that goals are met, to the workforce that must take personal responsibility for making
things happen, to unions that must work for the welfare of their members, while also
working cooperatively with management.
To raise awareness of the fact that quality is a never-ending journey that must be built on
knowledge management, organization learning and adaptation to an ever-changing
environment, and continuous improvement. Organizations can take many routes to
performance excellence, but none of them represents the one best way. Organizational
learning can be built into Baldrige, ISO, or Six Sigma approaches to quality improvement.
Whatever approach an organization takes whether it is ISO 9000, Baldrige, Six Sigma,
or some other approach or combination the approach should make sense and work in the
organization.
2.
Leadership is defined as the ability to positively influence people and systems under ones
authority to have a meaningful impact and achieve important results. It implies the right to
exercise authority and the ability to achieve results. Strong leadership is necessary to
successfully implement a quality process. Leaders may seek to motivate employees and
develop enthusiasm for quality with rhetoric, but taking strong, decisive, and personal
action to implement quality changes makes a bigger impression on employees. Leadership
is the most essential ingredient for success in developing a culture of performance
excellence. But gaining commitment from top executives is not easy. Dale Crownover,
CEO of Texas Nameplate Company a Baldrige winner, was quoted as saying that the
best way to sell quality to top executives is to show them where money is being lost due to
absenteeism, downtime, not having procedures in place, lack of job descriptions, and poor
training.
3.
Six competencies for leadership based on more than 50 authors thoughts on leadership
are:
Navigator creates shared meaning and provides direction towards a vision, mission,
goal or end-result. This competency may entail risk taking and requires constant
evaluation of the operating environment to ensure progress in the appropriate direction
is achieved.
Communicator effectively listens and articulates messages to provide shared
meaning. This competency involves the creation of an environment that reduces
barriers and fosters open, honest and honorable communication.
Mentor provides others with a role to guide their actions. This competency requires
the development of personal relationships that help others develop trust, integrity and
ethical decision making.
Learner continuously develops personal knowledge, skills and abilities through
formal study, experience, reflection and recreation.
Builder shapes processes and structures to allow for the achievement of goals and
outcomes. This competency also entails assuming responsibility for ensuring necessary
resources are available and the evaluation of processes to ensure effective resource
use.
Motivator influences others to take action in a desirable manner. This competency
also includes the evaluation of peoples actions to ensure they are performing
consistently with the mission, goal or end-result.
Key practices for performance excellence leadership may be found in Table 9-1. They
include, in summary form:
a. Relating to visionary leadership, there is the need for organization leaders (especially
Senior Leaders) to set and deploy organizational vision and values, demonstrate those
values through person actions, promote an environment leading to legal and ethical
behavior, and create a sustainable organization.
b. Relating to organizational performance, there is the need for leaders to create an
environment for organizational performance improvement, with a focus on the
organizations mission and strategic objectives, innovation, competitive or role-model
performance leadership, and organizational agility; provide for organizational and
workforce learning and participate in succession planning and the development of future
organizational leaders
c. Relating to communication, organizational leaders must communicate with the entire
workforce, encourage frank, two-way communication throughout the organization, and
communicate key decisions.
d. Relating to performance and results, leaders are expected to take an active role in
reward and recognition programs to reinforce high performance, create an action focus to
accomplish the organizations objectives, review performance measures to inform them on
needed actions, balance value for customers and other stakeholders in organizational
performance expectations and evaluate their own performance and use the results to
improve their leadership effectiveness and the leadership system.
e. Regarding community focus, leaders must contribute to supporting and strengthening
key communities such as charitable organizations, education, and others.
5.
The leadership system refers to how leadership is exercised throughout the organization,
and includes both formal and informal mechanisms for leadership development. It requires
the elements of: 1) clear values that reflect stakeholder requirements and set high
expectations for performance and improvement; 2) a means of building loyalty and
teamwork based on the shared values, encouraging initiative and risk-taking, and
subordinating organization to purpose and function; and 3) a mechanism for leaders to
engage in self-examination and improvement.
6.
Corporate social responsibility and community support efforts include what is termed
Corporate Governance in the Baldrige Award criteria. It includes development of ethics,
protection of public health, safety, and concern for the environment. Senior leaders must
act to prevent problems, make forthright responses when problems occur, and make
information available in order to maintain public awareness, safety, and confidence in the
organization. Leaders should not only comply with local, regional, and national laws and
regulations, but also make an effort to continuously improve beyond mere compliance.
Good citizenship implies that an organization and its leaders support publicly important
purposes, such as improving education, public health, the environment, etc., within the
limits of its resources. Corporate social responsibility is more important than ever because
of recent corporate scandals that have occurred, especially in housing, banking, and
financial markets. It has also become a strategic imperative and a competitive or
marketplace necessity. Research points to a positive relationship between CSR and
business performance. In addition, an ethical business environment within an organization
creates trust from customers and employees, resulting in higher customer satisfaction,
stronger employee commitment, and improved quality, all of which lead to higher profits.
8.
Traditional leadership theories (see Bonus Materials on the Premium website) are based on
four common perspectives:
d)
These theories have implications for total quality in that they provide different views of
how leaders lead. They also help to understand how these theories have evolved to the
present. The older views suggest that perspectives on quality management may benefit
from looking at what other leaders do, but they also contain an implied warning that there
is no one best way that can be incorporated into every organization. Thus, if effective
leadership behavior depends on situational factors i.e. who is leading, who is led, and what
is the situation, that may change over time, the TQ leader needs to determine the leader,
led and situational variables in his/her own part of the organization, and find out what
works. Likewise, in the role approach--where leaders must perform certain roles
depending on the situation, the TQ leader establishes what roles need to be filled within
his/her own organization, not some other successful one.
9.
10.
Organizations might pursue ISO 9000, Six Sigma, Baldrige, or some combination of all
three. Many routes can be taken to building a quality culture, but none of them represents
the one best way. Approaches that an organization uses should make the most sense
and work in the organization.
10
Many organizations start with ISO 9000 because of its prescriptive nature and process
orientation. They develop a quality policy, a quality manual, and prepare for, and perform
a quality audit, with the assistance of an outside auditor.
Other organizations start with an action orientation and install a Six Sigma process. A
fully implemented Six Sigma process is a strategic approach that is driven and supported
by top management, but is deployed throughout the organization at every level. Several
key principles are necessary for effective implementation of Six Sigma:
Process thinking.
A bottom-line orientation.
Training.
Iomega Corporation summarized it as: invest in people, make data based decisions, and
achieve and measure results.
Implementing Baldrige requires repetitive cycles of self-assessment, priority-setting, action
planning to address gaps and opportunities for improvement, and reflection of results, all
driven by an organizations vision, strategic challenges, and capabilities. A major benefit of
Baldrige is that it naturally provides a framework for organizational learning, and therefore
helps to enhance and sustain an organization, no matter what level of current maturity.
11.
Culture, or "corporate culture," is the way an organization does things. The way of doing
things at a company is important for effective quality management and control since the
processes of production generally have the greatest effect on quality output. Studies show
that change is easier in corporate cultures that emphasize customer satisfaction and
continuous improvement; in other words those that embrace performance excellence.
Cultural values are often seen in the mission and vision statements of organizations.
Culture is a powerful influence on behavior because it is shared widely and because it
operates without being talked about, and often without being thought of.
12.
Strategic change and process change are significantly different from each other, although
process change supports strategic change. Strategic change stems from strategic
objectives, which are generally externally focused and relate to significant customer,
11
Senior managers must ensure that their plans and strategies are successfully executed to
lead cultural change within the organization. The ten managerial roles, defined by
Mintzberg, that leaders must play include (1) figurehead, (2) leader (3) liaison, (4)
monitor, (5) disseminator, (6) spokesperson, (7) entrepreneur, (8) disturbance handler, (9)
resource allocator, (10) negotiator. The importance of each role is contingent on the
environmental and organizational factors that face managers who must lead, i.e. the
industry or environment surroundings of the organization, its age and size, etc.
Senior managers' responsibilities include the following tasks:
a. Ensure that the organization focuses on the needs of the customer.
b. Cascade the mission, vision, and values of the organization throughout the
organization.
c. Identify the critical processes that need attention and improvement.
d. Identify the resources and tradeoffs that must be made to fund the TQ activity.
e. Review progress and remove any barriers to progress.
f. Improve macro processes in which they are involved, both to improve the performance
of the process and to demonstrate their ability to use quality tools for problem solving.
Middle managers are often called on to monitor progress; disseminate information and
suggestions between local and distant line, staff, and outside experts; and act as a
spokesperson inside and outside the firm. Technology development requires that
managers constantly scan the environment to be aware of technological developments that
may threaten or enhance the operations of the company. Systems and process integration
means optimizing the system to meet strategic goals such as customer service, and using
tools of quality measurement and continuous improvement. Samuel suggests that
transforming middle managers into change agents requires a systematic process that
dissolves traditional management boundaries and replaces them with an empowered and
team-oriented state of accountability for organizational performance. Middle managers
must also show that they support total quality, by listening to employees as customers,
creating a positive work environment, implementing quality improvements enthusiastically,
challenging people to develop new ideas and reach their potential, setting challenging
goals and providing positive feedback, and following through on promises. These changes
are often difficult for middle managers to accept.
The work force implements quality policies. This requires ownership that goes beyond
empowerment and gives employees the right to a voice in deciding what needs to be done
and how to do it. It is based on a belief that what is good for the organization is also good
for the individual and vice-versa.
12
Labor's role is first to recognize the need for changing its relationship with management
and then to educate its members as to how cooperation will affect the organization. This
information includes what its members can expect, and how working conditions and job
security might change. At the same time, management must realize that the skills and
knowledge of all employees are needed to improve quality and meet competitive
challenges. Management must be willing to develop a closer working relationship with
labor and be ready to address union concerns and cultivate trust.
14.
Wainwright made a radical change in corporate culture to deal with their crisis in the
1980s. Management realized that they were part of the problem, so they put all workers
on salaries and began to call them associates. Management and workers all began to wear
the same uniform, developed common reward and bonus systems together, tore down
walls and barriers, and began to treat both internal and external customers as partners.
Their culture is now based on sincere belief and trust in people. The lessons learned
indicate that management puts up many barriers in developing corporate culture, and only
they can dismantle them if they want to develop such an open, productive, and supportive
culture.
15.
16.
The Best Practices study, by Ernst and Young, found that best practices depend on the
current level of performance of a company, and that trying to implement all the practices
of world-class organizations can actually waste time and money, not help. The study used
two performance measures: ROA (return on assets: after tax income divided by total
assets) and VAE (value added per employee: sales less the costs of materials, supplies, and
work done by outside contractors). Low performers -- those with less than two percent
ROA and $47,000 VAE -- can reap the highest benefits by concentrating on fundamentals,
i.e. identifying and improving processes to better serve customer and market demands.
Medium performers -- those with ROA's from two percent to 6.9 percent and VAE
between $47,000 and $73,999 -- achieve the most benefits from meticulously
documenting gains and further refining practices to improve value added per employee,
time to market, and customer satisfaction. High performers -- with ROA and VAE
exceeding seven percent $74,000 respectively -- gain the most from using self-managed
teams and cross-functional teams that concentrate on horizontal processes such as
logistics and process development.
13
The best practices can be related to the Deming philosophy in that Deming always
advocated profound understanding of processes and systems. This is shown in Points 3, 5,
and 9 of his 14 Points. In 3 he advocated using inspection for improvement of processes
and cost reduction (concentrating on the "fundamentals" for low-performing companies);
Point 5 requires improving constantly and forever the system of production and service
(documenting the gains for medium performers, as well as other process refinements); and
more emphasis on advanced teamwork and horizontal processes (for high performers), as
suggested in Point 9 -- optimize toward the aims and purposes of the company the efforts
of teams, groups, and staff areas.
17.
The typical life cycle of a quality initiative includes the steps of:
1. Adoption: the implementation stage of a new quality initiative.
2. Regeneration: when a new quality initiative is used in conjunction with an existing one
to generate new energy and impact.
3. Energizing: when an existing quality initiative is refocused and given new resources.
4. Maturation: when quality is strategically aligned and deployed across the organization.
5. Limitation or stagnation: when quality has not been strategically driven or aligned.
6. Decline: When a quality management system (QMS) has had a limited impact,
initiatives are failing and the QMS is awaiting termination.
It is important that senior leaders understand that the life cycle provides a strategic
mechanism to chart and sustain quality while proactively countering shortcomings of its
implementation, such as stagnation and limited application, which can ultimately result in
failure.
18.
Senge defines a learning organization as "an organization that is continually expanding its
capacity to create its future. For such an organization, it is not enough merely to survive.
'Survival learning,' or what is most often termed 'adaptive learning' is important -- indeed it
is necessary. But for a learning organization, 'adaptive learning' must be joined by
'generative learning,' learning that enhances our capacity to create."
Organizations cannot count on succeeding in the long run if they merely have committed
leaders who use TQ principles for strategic planning and policy deployment, practice TQ
in daily operations, and use it for continuous improvement of the current process. These
adaptive activities are called "first generation" TQ. Senge advocates developing a learning
organization with a new approach to leadership. Instead of the adaptive approach to
learning, leaders must use a generative approach -- constantly anticipating the needs of
customers to the point of anticipating products or services they would value but have
never experienced and would never think of asking for. Leaders must develop the ability to
integrate creative thinking and problem solving throughout the organization.
19.
Self-assessment is the holistic evaluation of processes and performance. The self part of
the term means that it should be conducted internally rather than simply relying on an
external consultant. An organization should make a critical self-assessment of where it
14
stands in relation to its quality commitment. That can help it to identify strengths and areas
for improvement and determine what practices will yield the most benefit. At a minimum, a
self-assessment should address the following:
a.
Management involvement and leadership. To what extent are all levels of
management involved?
b.
Product and process design. Do products meet customer needs? Are
products designed for easy manufacturability?
c.
Product control. Is a strong product control system in place that
concentrates on defect prevention, before the fact, rather than defect
removal after the product is made?
d.
Customer and supplier communications. Does everyone understand who
the customer is? To what extent do customers and suppliers communicate
with each other?
e.
Quality improvement. Is a quality improvement plan in place? What results
have been achieved?
f.
Employee participation. Are all employees actively involved in quality
improvement?
g.
Education and training. What is done to ensure that everyone understands
his or her job and has the necessary skills? Are employees trained in quality
improvement techniques?
h.
Quality information. How is feedback on quality results collected and
used?
Most self-administered surveys, however, can only provide a rudimentary assessment of an
organizations strengths and weaknesses. The most complete way to assess the level of TQ
maturity in an organization is to evaluate its practices and results against the Malcolm
Baldrige National Quality Award criteria by using trained internal or external examiners, or
by actually applying for the Baldrige or a similar state award and receiving comprehensive
examiner feedback. Understanding ones strengths and opportunities for improvement
creates a basis for evolving toward higher levels of performance.
20.
15
By saying that leadership is the "driver," we try to emphasize the critical nature of leadership
at every level for successful TQ. The answer to Review Question 3, above, elaborates on the
practices of top managers in leading TQ focused organizations. Without strong commitment
of leaders at every level, a TQ system may not survive, and it certainly will not grow and
flourish.
2.
Again see Review Question 3, above, as a basis for developing the answer to this question.
3.
Leaders can demonstrate the seven personal leadership characteristics of: accountability,
courage, humility, integrity, creativity, perseverance, and well-being, but it isnt always easy.
As quality guru A. V. Feigenbaum noted, The passion is in living and working in the spirit
of a quality ethic which means having a deep belief that what you do to make quality
better makes everything in the organization better.
4.
5.
The answer to this question will require that students "go beyond" the textbook and the
materials in the Bonus materials folder on the Premium website and research the Fiedler
model, in more detail. A principles of management or organizational behavior text will
probably have Fiedler's "Model of the Effects of Leadership Styles on Leader Performance
According to Situational Conditions" and sufficient detail for this answer. Although Fiedler's
situational model is not discussed in detail in the chapter, other sources show that the
"situational conditions" consist of the leader (called the "leader position power" variable by
Fiedler), the led (called the "leader-member relations" variable), and the situation (called "task
structure"). Because tasks become less structured in a TQ environment (in contrast to rigid,
highly structured tasks in traditional organizations), leader position power is weakened (the
first line employees are "empowered"), but leader-member relations are typically good (due
to high quality communications and shared commitment). Thus, a "relationship-oriented"
leader is better qualified than a "task-oriented leader" in this situation.
6.
A dysfunctional corporate culture is one in which shared values and behavior are at odds
with the organization's long-term health. If the quality of a company's product or service is
low, there is usually a flaw somewhere in the corporate culture. An example of a
dysfunctional culture is a high-tech company that stresses individual rewards while
innovation depends on teamwork. To change their management practices, organizations
must first address their fundamental values.
7.
16
Visionary leadership
Customer driven excellence
Organizational and personal learning
Valuing workforce members and partners
Agility
Focus on the future
Managing for innovation
Management by fact
Social responsibility
Focus on results and creating value
Systems perspective
Although there is overlap between these values and concepts, it is easy to see that the
criteria and core values and concepts may be aligned as follows, with criteria listed
alphabetically and values under them, numerically:
A. Leadership
1. Visionary leadership
11. Systems perspective
B. Strategic Planning
6. Focus on the future
7. Managing for innovation
C. Customer and Market Focus
2. Customer-driven excellence
9. Social responsibility
D. Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management
8. Management by fact
10. Focus on results and creating value
E. Workforce Focus
4. Valuing workforce members and partners
3. Organizational and personal learning
F. Process Management
5. Agility
7. Managing for innovation (repeated)
8
In a site visit to a TQ organization, you would see most of these core values and
concepts exemplified. In most cases, you would not have an opportunity to
perform a site visit at a non-TQ company. If you did, you would tend to see the
17
18
your organizations success in recovering from defects and mistakes (making things right
for the customer) is crucial to retaining customers and building customer relationships.
Customer-driven organizations address not only the product and service characteristics
that meet basic customer requirements but also those features and characteristics that
differentiate products and services from competing offerings. Such differentiation may be
based upon new or modified offerings, combinations of product and service offerings,
customization of offerings, multiple access mechanisms, rapid response, or special
relationships.
Customer driven excellence is thus a strategic concept. It is directed toward customer
retention, market share gain, and growth. It demands constant sensitivity to changing and
emerging customer and market requirements and to the factors that drive customer
satisfaction and retention. It demands anticipating changes in the marketplace. Therefore,
customer-driven excellence demands awareness of developments in technology and
competitors offerings, as well as rapid and flexible response to customer and market
changes.
Organizational and Personal Learning
Achieving the highest levels of business performance requires a well-executed approach to
organizational and personal learning. Organizational learning includes both continuous
improvement of existing approaches and adaptation to change, leading to new goals
and/or approaches. Learning needs to be embedded in the way your organization operates.
This means that learning (1) is a regular part of daily work; (2) is practiced at personal,
work unit, and organizational levels; (3) results in solving problems at their source (root
cause); (4) is focused on sharing knowledge throughout the organization; and (5) is
driven by opportunities to effect significant change and to do better. Sources for learning
include employees ideas, research and development (R&D), customers input, best
practice sharing, and benchmarking.
Organizational learning can result in (1) enhancing value to customers through new and
improved products and services; (2) developing new business opportunities; (3) reducing
errors, defects, waste, and related costs; (4) improving responsiveness and cycle time
performance; (5) increasing productivity and effectiveness in the use of all resources
throughout your organization; and (6) enhancing your organizations performance in
fulfilling its societal responsibilities and its service to your community as a good citizen.
Employees success depends increasingly on having opportunities for personal learning
and practicing new skills. Organizations invest in employees personal learning through
education, training, and other opportunities for continuing growth. Such opportunities
might include job rotation and increased pay for demonstrated knowledge and skills. Onthe-job training offers a cost-effective way to train and to better link training to your
organizational needs and priorities. Education and training programs may benefit from
19
10.
Each of the principles used by geese has a quality parallel that should be considered. Many
of them are so obvious as to make one wonder, how did those geese become so smart?
or why are we so dumb? Organizations wishing to implement performance excellence
might benefit from studying the behavior of geese and drawing the following parallels;
a) This shows the synergistic value of teamwork. The team is
able to provide more lift to the organization than any one
individual, or the sum of their efforts when they work alone.
b) Going alone to reach a goal is possible, but generally not as
productive, or as much fun.
20
c) The most powerful leaders are the ones that are not
threatened by letting their subordinates take the lead from
time to time. Not only does this help the leader to rest, but it
also helps the employee to develop valuable leadership and
problem-solving skills that can be used immediately and later.
d) Everyone needs encourage when performing a difficult task,
especially if one is the leader. Too often the followers dont
show appreciation for the leader, which makes their job more
difficult.
e) This action by the geese shows concern for others. It also
shows that teamwork is maintained, even when trying to
assist someone that has fallen behind. The fact that two
geese stay behind to help the third one is quite impressive.
The cost may be worth the price, if the injured member is
brought back to full productivity.
11.
Student opinions may vary, but by this time in the course, they should
be convinced of the value of quality, and that quality does pay.
They should also consider what a world without a quality focus would
mean, in terms of safety, security, and satisfaction with our products
and services.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
21
Leadership styles will vary widely, depending on such factors as the type of organization,
its size, and the philosophy of the top management. Expect to see any one of the styles
listed in the chapter, including coaching, transactional, or transformational leadership, or a
combination of two or more of these.
3.
Conklins questions can provide a useful checklist for leadership styles. See his article,
referenced in the question, for more background. They also provide a starting point for
useful discussions of what is a leader. Keep in mind that there are hundreds of
psychologically validated leadership inventories. We can only provide a brief introduction
and overview in this chapter. For a more rigorous approach, consult one of the
organization behavior professors in your universitys college of business or the
management department.
4.
5.
Students will likely find a great deal of variation in terms of commitment to quality and
performance excellence principles. In addition, there will be a lot of variation as to the
keys to success of those that do have an on-going commitment. For more processoriented manufacturing or service organizations, expect to see the five universal best
practices exhibited, including:
a. Cycle-time analysis
b. Process value analysis
c. Process simplification
d. Strategic planning
e. Formal supplier certification programs
Also, such organizations would seek to avoid or tear down barriers to successful
implementation, such as:
a. lack of what Deming called constancy of purpose
b. lack of a holistic systems perspective
c. lack of alignment and integration with the organizational system.
d. failure to focus on achieving a shared vision through development of a sound strategy
and effective deployment.
6.
This project is designed to give students insights into how the Baldrige criteria are closely
inter-related to core values and concepts. See answer to Discussion Question #7, above,
as a resource for this project.
22
7.
This can be an interesting hands on project that may be beneficial to the students who
are the interviewees, as well as those who are interviewing. It is likely that few students,
even good ones, have analyzed how they go about learning, much less develop best
practices. There is a whole literature in educational psychology on learning styles that
might be explored.
8.
See the answer to Review Question #10, above, as a resource for this project. Small and
large companies differ in a number of ways in which they can implement TQ, whether they
use a Baldrige, Six Sigma, or ISO 9000 approach. Small companies have less access to
specialists, such as financial, technical (such as Six Sigma Black Belts), and human
resources experts. They often cannot support sophisticated information systems to gather
and analyze customer and process data. However, they do have some advantages over
large organizations. They are more agile, thus able to respond quickly to changing
customer needs. Because they are small, they are often closer to their customers and
interact frequently with them. Employees often have been with the company for many
years and are highly skilled and loyal. They will often respond to a problem or crisis by
sticking with it until its solved. Quality can often be built in to products or services,
because employees will see the need for it in order to remain competitive. Students should
be encouraged to study some small and large companies in order to explore these
differences.
9.
The following table is meant to be a suggestive, but not exhaustive, list of characteristic
changes in practices related to the Baldrige Criteria, as an organization moves from a
traditional to a world-class quality system.
Traditional
Growing
Quality
World-Class
Baldrige
Management
Awareness of Quality
Management
Quality
Category
Practices
System
Management
1
Senior leaders job is Senior leaders job is Senior leaders job is Senior leaders job is
to maintain the
to ensure that quality to define and
developing vision
status quo by
problems are
manage change
and encouraging
preventing change
brought to mgt.s
toward a quality
innovation and
attention
mgt. system
change.
Managers oversee
Managers oversee Managers guide
Managers facilitate
departments or
functions.
dept./functions to
depts/ functions to- depts/ functions
stop ext. failure
ward quality
efforts to reach
prevention/appraisal stretch goals
2
Senior leaders
Senior leaders
Senior leaders and Senior leaders
develop goals and
develop goals in
lower level mgrs.
develop mission and
pass down
consultation with
develop goals and
vision on which
middle
managers
resolve
through
give
stretch goals are
Goals are zero-sum
based and use a
Goals are based on & take.
game - loser for
catchball process to
Goals
are
based
on
every winner
incentives for
deploy
highest individual
mutual trust and
Growing
Awareness of Quality
Quality
Management
System
team efforts
23
World-Class
Baldrige
Quality
Category
Management
performers
Goals are cascaded
with individual and
team rewards for
accomplishment
3
Customers are
Customers needs are Customers are
Customers are
outsiders in the
the focus of
surveyed to
insiders in the
domain of marketing marketing and sales determine
domain of design,
and sales
satisfaction
production, and
Customers have
Customers have no some impact on
Customers/suppliers marketing
Customers have a
impact on product
product design
are consulted in
design
major impact on
Complaints are taken product design
decisions
product design
Complaints are only as a signal of quality
Complaints are
Complaints are only
reacted to
problems
handled systema part of a complete
Customer/supplier
atically
and
used
for
customer
dialogs on quality
product/process
management process
sometimes occur
improvement
4
Control is achieved Control is achieved Control is achieved Control is achieved
by pre-established
by somewhat flexible by cooperative team by alignment with
inflexible responsive responsive patterns efforts to improve
goals
patterns
processes
Information is
Information is
Information is
generally considered Information is
interlinked and is
generally considered to be confidential,
considered to be
considered to be
to be secret
but available
widely available to
openly available
those inside the
unless proprietary or
organization
personally sensitive
5
People are an
People often have People should be People should be
interchangeable
valuable unique
encouraged to work empowered to work
commodity
skills and should be in teams to solve
individually and in
teams to meet
Adversarial relation- rewarded for indivi- problems
dual
contributions
individual and
Cooperative
ship between union
organizational goals
Consultative
and management
relationships
Relationships
relationship
between
between
union
and
Hierarchical
management need to between union and
chimney structures union and mgt.
be developed
management based
prevent teamwork Chimney structon full partnership
Chimney strucbetween functions.
ures need to be
Cross-functional and
reduced to permit
tures virtually
Performance
team, and project
appraisal and reward teamwork between eliminated to
functions.
enhance
teamwork
structures virtually
systems place people
between functions.
eliminate hierarchy.
Performance
in a competitive
24
Growing
Awareness of Quality
Quality
World-Class
Baldrige
Management
Quality
Category
System
Management
appraisal and reward Performance
Performance
systems need modifi- appraisal and reward appraisal and reward
cation to reduce
systems modified by systems replaced by
competitive environ- team and/or goalteam, goal, and
ment
based reward
knowledge-based
systems
reward systems
6
Processes are seen Processes are seen Reorganization of Processes are seen
as a collection of
as a collection of
processes of some
as a system of
separate, specialized separate units, in a
separate units, out of interdependent
units, in a functional functional hierarchy, the functional
processes linking the
hierarchy.
but cross-functional hierarchy, is seen as organization to
advantageous
customers and
Suppliers are pitted activities require a
coordinative
suppliers
Suppliers are
against each other to
mechanism.
obtain the lowest
consulted for critical Suppliers are
Suppliers
are
price
design information
partners with their
selected, based on
and given support in customers. Goal is to
performance to
efforts to develop
have few sup-pliers
obtain better quality improved products
and establish longand service at an
and services
term relationships
acceptable price
7
Results are pri Results are pri Results are stated in Results are stated as
marily stated
marily stated in
financial, market,
a balanced
financially
financial and market operating, quality
scorecard
terms
metrics
Any negative
Benchmarking and
Any
negative
Any
negative
deviation is a cause
historical comparisons
for corrective action deviation is a cause deviation is a cause are used for setting
and search for a
for corrective action for correction after goals, tracking, and
scapegoat
some investigation, improvement.
and development of Any negative
a new tracking
deviation is a cause
measure, if required for investigation
using existing goals
and metrics before
any corrective action
is taken
10.
This project suggests that the quality life-cycle of development, perhaps using Figure 9.4,
the Baldrige Roadmap to Performance Excellence, would provide a visual model of the process
for pursuing performance excellence from start to (Baldrige Award-winning) world-class
performance. Also, the IQS Best Practices Report could also be used to suggest which areas to
concentrate on at each stage. For example, organizations starting out on the road to performance
25
26
interdependencies encountered old departmental barriers. Audit reports and corrective actions
languished because the president periodically overrode the quality managers authority, fearing
delivery promises might be compromised.
Indications such as the above were ignored because the steering committee members rationalized
that everyone knew what needed to be done, due to the fervent efforts exerted in solution finding.
Improvement efforts were not very effective because concluding steps were inadequately thought
through and poorly managed. Proposed solutions were not completely integrated into daily
activities.
3. Now that Novedad and the Steering Committee have received their wake-up call, a number
of steps should be taken to revise and implement an improved, workable quality management
system. These include:
a. Define the need for making improvements include communicating the scope of the problem,
types of complaints and errors being made, types of waste being experienced, and benefits of
improvements. This might be done by sending a letter from the president to all employees, and by
posting information prominently in work areas.
b. Develop and transmit the purpose for the improved quality management process it must be
brief; it should appeal to employees, customers, and stakeholders; and it must contain a
challenging, but attainable goal. This might be done by the Steering Committee by affirming the
mission and vision for the quality management process and
c. Identify work alliances and connections for implementation the Steering Committee might
meet with departmental representatives, informal leaders, and others to build trust and seek ideas
on how to structure improvement processes and projects.
d. Create a plan the Steering committee might revise the improvement plan, setting clear,
measureable goals with a timeline.
e. Empower people the Steering Committee should ensure that training is provided,
representative project teams are established, perhaps with teams electing their leaders, support is
given to overcome bureaucratic barriers, and projects are reported on regularly to provide
visibility and momentum.
f. Create opportunities for small gains if the Steering Committee can guide teams to pick the
low hanging fruit first, the small wins will lead to a sense of accomplishment and confidence to
tackle the more challenging problems. For example customer complaints might be handled, and
processes for preventing them might be developed.
g. Expand and complete projects projects bypassed in initial rounds of improvement, such as
analyzing and simplifying complex processes, might be taken on by mature project teams.
h. Reinforce the improved structures the Steering Committee should evaluate new organization
structures, monitor project team activities and results, celebrate accomplishments, and begin to
make the quality management process an integral part of the strategic and action planning
structure of the organization.
Case - Novel Connect - Leadership
27
1. The factors in the Organizational Profile that are the most important in evaluating their
Senior Leadership approaches are:
Purpose: Facilitates a world on the move. Vision: the most innovative company for mobile
communication in the world. Mission: leverages new and existing technology to advance
mobile communication. Core values: agility, valuing employees/partners, innovation, and
sustainability
Culture promotes core competencies of agility and communication: working out of the
home, flexible work schedules, and maximizing technology (cell phones, virtual meetings,
teleconferencing) to minimize travel.
4,188 employees make up a virtual, distributed workforce: 1,200 in innovation (sales,
R&D, marketing, IT, and product engineering), 2,738 in operations, and 250 in
administration and support. There is no employee union. Women compose 65% of the
workforce; 50% of employees are under age 40; for 20%, English is a second language;
and 15% are disabled.
Organizational structure: A nine-member Board of Directors (BOD) composed of eight
independent members and the CEO, four standing BOD committees, and a five-member
Senior Leader Team (SLT). The relatively flat organization has one rotating ethics officer,
and the 11 pods have team leaders.
Key suppliers/partners: two offshore manufacturing suppliers (in China and India), a cell
carrier, retailers, transportation companies, integrated component/software manufacturers,
universities, IT support, a security company, and a law firm
Strategic challenges: communication, rapidly changing customer/market needs (volatility
in niche markets), volatility of the overseas environment
2. Based on their response in Category 1 to the 2008 Baldrige criteria questions for this
category, Novel Connects strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement are as
follows:
1.1 Senior Leadership
STRENGTHS
In 1994, Novel Connects Senior Leadership Team (SLT) conducted brainstorming and
planning sessions to establish the organizations vision and core values, which were refined in
1996, 2000, and 2002 and, along with the organizations mission, have undergone an annual
review since 2003. SLT members lead at least one project each year that exemplifies a core value
and also lead weekly discussions to explore the core value with employees. The Novel Path
(Figure 1.1-1) depicts the organizations leadership system, performance management process,
and organizational reviews and includes the mission, vision, and core values. It is deployed to
employees as part of the performance appraisal process (e.g., through the personal measuring of
action and performance [PMap]) and to customers and stakeholders through marketing materials,
funding events, and surveys. Partners are required to demonstrate the core values as part of the
partner selection process. In addition, the Novel Path is integrated with the strategic planning and
communication processes.
28
29
consider English a second language, as well as for overseas suppliers in China and India. This may
inhibit Novel Connect from effectively addressing its key strategic challenge and core competency
regarding communication.
1.2 Governance and Social Responsibilities
1. For Category 1.2, the factors in the Organizational Profile that are the most important in
evaluating their Governance and Social Responsibilities approaches are:
2. Based on their response in Category 1.2 to the 2008 Baldrige criteria questions for this
category, Novel Connects strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement are as
follows:
STRENGTHS
Novel Connect evaluates the performance of all senior leaders. The Board of Directors
(BOD) reviews the CEO/President annually, and she in turn consults with the BOD Executive
Governance Committee to review SLT performance. All leaders must participate in a 360-degree
feedback process, which provides the basis for behavior reviews. The BOD conducts annual selfevaluations with feedback from the SLT and in 2007 initiated an approach to obtain shareholder
feedback at its annual meeting. Using that feedback, the BOD selects up to two improvement
areas annually. Senior leaders use these reviews to improve their leadership effectiveness through
the use of PMaps. In addition, the SLT reviews an aggregate summary of all of its performance
reviews and selects up to three initiatives annually that are aimed at improving the leadership
system.
30
Novel Connect promotes and helps ensure ethical behavior in its interactions through multiple
approaches, including reissuing the ethics policy annually, requiring employees and suppliers to
sign the Code of Ethical Compliance, maintaining an ethics hotline, discussing Ethics Examples
scenarios at monthly meetings, terminating employment for ethical violations, and rotating the
position of Chief Ethics Officer among SLT members, a practice that has been featured in both
industry and national publications. These approaches assist Novel Connect in meeting its
workforce requirement of connection with the companys values.
Novel Connect actively supports its key communities through numerous approaches,
including a foundation established in 2002. The foundation provides funds for four primary
causes (i.e., mobility, environment, education, safety) that are aligned to the core value of
sustainability. Foundation processes are evaluated annually, and recipients must prove the
efficacy of their efforts. Other approaches include matching funds for employees charitable
donations and 16 hours of paid time off annually for community service. In addition, senior
leaders are expected to serve leadership roles in at least one national and two regional or
local nonprofit organizations that focus on work aligned with Novel Connects core values.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT
While SLT members participate in process improvement and operational performance reviews,
it is unknown how they systematically review and achieve fiscal accountability. For example,
systematic approaches are not described for achieving Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) compliance, and it is not clear what financial data are reviewed
in monthly and weekly meetings beyond the two profit-specific measures in the Novel Compass
Scorecard. The lack of an effective process and tracking measures may make it difficult for Novel
Connect to ensure the protection of stakeholder and stockholder interests.
It is unclear how Novel Connect addresses the adverse impacts on society from partners and
suppliers operations associated with Novel Connects products and services. For example, it is
not apparent that the resource-sustaining approaches used in the U.S. manufacturing facility are
also used in the manufacturing plants in China and India. Additionally, there is no evidence of
systematic review and improvement of Novel Connects resource-sustaining processes, including
the key processes for addressing risks associated with its products, services, and operations (e.g.,
Go-Green/Grow-Green and Customer Advisory Groups [CAGs]).
Some of the approaches used to ensure ethical and legal behavior do not appear to be well
deployed and/or systematically improved. For example, while Novel Connect reviews
relationships and transactions in offshore facilities to ensure they comply with U.S. laws and align
with the Novel Path, it is unclear if the ethics investigation/resolution process is deployed to all
suppliers and partners. In addition, there is no evidence of reviews of or improvements in ethicsrelated approaches, including the ethics hotline, the Code of Ethical Compliance, and ethics
scenarios and follow-up discussions.
3. a. Specific advice for Category 1.1, that might help Novel Connect, would include:
31
the need to develop a systematic review and improvement of key leadership approaches, such
as processes to ensure ethical and legal behavior, to foster organizational sustainability, and to
facilitate organization-wide communication.
the need for implementing and effectively deploying communication methods to all employees
and to all suppliers and partners, including overseas partners. For example, Novel Connect should
insure that meetings, newsletters, daily e-mails, and video discussions are conducted in multiple
languages for the 20% of the workforce who consider English a second language, as well as for
overseas suppliers in China and India.
3. b. Specific advice for Category 1.2, that might help Novel Connect, would include:
need to develop a way to systematically review and achieve fiscal accountability. For example,
systematic approaches are not described for achieving Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) compliance. Also, there is a need to review financial data in
monthly and weekly meetings beyond the two profit-specific measures in the Novel Compass
Scorecard.
need to develop a way for Novel Connect to address the adverse impacts on society from
partners and suppliers operations associated with Novel Connects products and services.
Additionally, there needs to be a process for systematic review and improvement of Novel
Connects resource-sustaining processes, including the key processes for addressing risks
associated with its products, services, and operations (e.g., Go-Green/Grow-Green and Customer
Advisory Groups [CAGs]).
need to ensure that ethical and legal behavior are well deployed to all suppliers and partners
and/or systematically improved. Also the company needs to ensure that a process for reviews of
or improvements in ethics-related approaches, including the ethics hotline, the Code of Ethical
Compliance, and ethics scenarios and follow-up discussions is developed and deployed.
For all of the above, tools and approaches may be found in the Baldrige
process, which specifically recommends that: Implementing Baldrige requires
repetitive cycles of self-assessment, priority-setting, action planning to address gaps and
opportunities for improvement, and reflection of results, all driven by an organizations vision,
strategic challenges, and capabilities.
Case - The Parable of the Green Lawn1
1.
Source: James A. Alloway, Jr. "Laying the Groundwork for Total Quality," Quality Progress, 27,
1, January, 1990, p. 67.
1
32
"Pogo," the character who played the title part in a 1960's and '70's
cartoon series used to say, "We have met the enemy, and he is us!"
2.
33
B.
C.
D.
E.
Dorothys call to action was precipitated by a crisis -- the tornado that transported her to
an alien land.
Managers at many levels find that there is a quality crisis in their part of the organization
that must be systematically dealt with. Often, they feel that they are in an alien land when
they are expected to lead their organization along the road to quality. Organizations need
to make backup plans if they are to avoid Dorothy-like disasters.
In the throes of a Kansas tornado, Dorothy is transported to an unfamiliar land. She is
lost and confused and uncertain about the next steps to take. She realizes she is in a
changed state -- the Land of Oz, and must devise a plan to get home.
Here, managers, most of whom are not at home with concepts of quality, such as
customer focus, employee participation, teamwork, and empowerment, management by
fact, or continuous improvement, must devise a plan to get home (become comfortable)
with these concepts and techniques. Strategic and action planning are both essential to
quality results.
Dorothy is a hero for killing the Wicked Witch of the East. Dorothy and Toto leave for Oz
via the Yellow Brick Road. Along the way, they are joined by Scarecrow, Tin Man, and
Lion. Through their teamwork, they provide mutual support and overcome many risks
and barriers to endure the vexing journey.
This suggests that managers are not alone in their search for the illusive goals of high
quality. However, the journey contains both breakthroughs and daunting challenges. Some
quality witches will be killed easily. Great strides can often be made by developing
teamwork, teaching quality tools, and implementing statistical process control. However,
other goals and breakthroughs are often more difficult to attain.
Dorothy and her entourage finally reach Oz and meet the Wizard. Rather than instantly
granting their wishes, the Wizard gives them an assignment -- to obtain the Wicked
Witch's broom.
As Deming often said, Theres no instant pudding! with quality. Often the most soughtafter goals are the most difficult to attain. You dont become a Baldrige Award winner by
having a single quality champion, screening out defects, and having a few team meetings.
Dorothy and company experience several encounters with near disaster while trying to
get the broom, including Dorothy's incarceration. In a struggle to extinguish the
Scarecrow's fire (incited by the Wicked Witch), Dorothy tosses a bucket of water, some of
which hits the Witch and melts her. Dorothy is rewarded with the broomstick and returns
to Oz.
This set of episodes has some interesting parallels with the quality journey. Managers who
are involved with quality efforts can sometimes get side-tracked and hung up with shortterm firefighting, such as union disputes, suppliers who dont understand the quality
issues, and/or have few resources or interest in developing a compatible quality system,
34
etc. However, managers can also get lucky, such as when lagging managers or teams
finally get it and become much more quality minded and helpful in making significant
improvements as team players. Such luck rarely happens unless goals and plans are
developed, deployed, aligned, and infrastructure that can capitalize on luck is in place
when it happens.
F. Returning to Oz, the group talks with the Wizard, expecting him to help Dorothy return to
Kansas. After defrocking the Wizard, they find out he does not know how. The Wizard
tries to use a hot air balloon to return and accidentally leaves Dorothy and Toto behind
upon takeoff. Glinda arrives and helps Dorothy realize she can return to Kansas on her
own with the help of the ruby slippers.
It is clear that the Wizard is an unscrupulous quality consultant selling the latest brand of
snake oil, while Glinda is the wise manager or helpful consultant who says, You have to
take the available tools and learn to do it yourself. Developing and deploying a quality
system, with continuing leadership, stretch goals, effective deployment, and ultimate
alignment, often requires a long and difficult journey along a winding road.
G. Dorothy awakens from her dream and experiences a new understanding and appreciation
for her home and family in Kansas. "Oh, Auntie Em, there's no place like home."
Quality can become a comfortable home only when people realize that the journey is
worth taking if a long-term perspective is adopted.
Bonus Materials
Quality in Practice: Leadership in the Virgin Group
1.
2.
Despite the fact that the organization is freewheeling and encourages creative
adaptation, it is likely that some strategic planning takes place. This is suggested by the
phrases: extremely competitive, strong executive role constellation, and Keiretsu-like
system, where companies act quasi-independently. Autonomy should not be a barrier to
oversight and long-range thinking, however. The process might be improved by
systematically having corporate managing directors meet periodically in order to discuss
plans, financial needs and business results with the top corporate executives at the Groups
headquarters in London.
3.
Strong leadership is suggested by the Strong executive role constellation under the
Leadership Style sub-category. Entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial organizational design
also suggests that creative local leaders in small autonomous units can, and are expected
35
The theory that the senior leadership, about which little was specifically said, would
probably fit best into the emerging charismatic leadership theory. Bransons leadership
style is somewhere between creative and impulsive. Thus, he could also be said to be an
example of the charismatic leader.
Cases
Case - Equipto, Inc.
1.
2.
Details were not given on the content of the training, but it is likely
that it was more team based than SPC oriented because of Bob
Green's influence. Up-front training was very popular in the 1980's
(and still is in some organizations). However, the advantage of JIT
training is that team members can immediately put their skills into
practice and see results. The large scale training effort may have
caused the company to lose some momentum.
3.
36
5.
LANB was established as a community bank in order to fill a gap that was obvious in a
non-typical small town in the USA. Los Alamos was built by the government to aid in the
development of atomic weapons during and after World War II. The government
infrastructure was unable to meet local needs after a peacetime environment and economy
was established, so a more normal banking facility was called for.
Senior leadership has modeled its commitment to the community through being involved,
personally and professionally in the community, and through their long-term commitment
to bank. Many of the senior leaders have been in place for more than 25 years with the
bank, indicating their personal commitment and stability.
The sense of community commitment is focused on quality and performance excellence in
numerous ways. Customer contributions to the community and loyalty to the bank are
recognized publicly in the bank lobby. In addition, the banks actions during the Cero
Gordo fire demonstrated their commitment to quality service, even under extreme
conditions.
2.
37
breaks down the hierarchical barriers by not claiming traditional top management perks,
such as reserved parking places close to the building.
It is especially important for a service organization, such as LANB, to focus on employees
for the long-term quality and success of the business. It is known that employee
satisfaction is closely correlated with customer satisfaction, and that customer satisfaction
is related to customer loyalty. In addition, if a business, such as LANB, in a small town
develops a reputation as a good place to work, recruiting new employees to handle
expansion and attrition becomes much easier than would otherwise be the case.
3.
Technology supports the banks mission, as it strives to be more customer driven than its
competitors. It is organized to identify customer needs more readily and more accurately
and, then, to respond more quickly and more satisfactorily. Technology is essential to
handle the thousands of bank transactions that take place on a daily and weekly basis.
Therefore, ti must be considered a core competency. Without performance excellence in
the back office and on their website, customers will quickly lose confidence in the ability
of the bank to handle their financial transactions.
LANB feels that a sustainability commitment is a good business practice for a number of
reasons. Customers in the region are a unique mix of highly educated scientists and
technicians and farmers, ranchers, Hispanics, and Native Americans. They all have a bias
toward sustainability and care of the environment. In addition, natural resources such as
water, energy, clean air, and good soil are increasingly difficult to develop and maintain in
the desert southwestern region. In addition, it makes smart business sense to save material
and other costs by reducing paper use, and recycling water, among other measures.
2.
LANB is moving beyond its core computational technology needed for everyday banking
transactions to green technology. It is making the effort to recycle water, reduce paper
waste through electronic communication, and reduce its carbon footprint through the
use of hybrid vehicles.
LANBs stated mission is to: Exceed the Expectations of our Customers, Employees and
Investors. Supporting the mission are and the values of Service Excellence, Valuing
People, Operating Efficiently, Remaining Flexible and Innovative and Supporting Our
Communities. Its sustainability commitment and the EcoSmart program are definitely in
line with the mission and values.
38
39
The reasons why the examiners identified the 4 strengths as listed were because they clearly
corresponded to, and exceeded the basic requirements in the criteria. For example, in the set of
questions in Section 1.1 of the criteria, the questions that are raised have been strongly answered
by the applicant in their Baldrige application:
Strength 1 supplies the answer to this question.
a. (1) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS set organizational VISION and VALUES? HOW do
SENIOR LEADERS DEPLOY your organizations VISION and VALUES through your
LEADERSHIP SYSTEM, to the WORKFORCE, to KEY suppliers and PARTNERS, and
to CUSTOMERS and other STAKEHOLDERS, as appropriate? HOW do SENIOR
LEADERS personal actions reflect a commitment to the organizations VALUES?
In a similar fashion, strengths 2 and 3 supply the answer to:
a. (3) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS create a SUSTAINABLE organization? HOW do
SENIOR LEADERS create an environment for organizational PERFORMANCE
improvement, the accomplishment of your MISSION and STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES,
INNOVATION, competitive or role-model PERFORMANCE leadership, and
organizational agility? HOW do they create an environment for organizational and
WORKFORCE LEARNING? HOW do they personally participate in succession planning
and the development of future organizational leaders?
Strength 4 supplies the answer to this question.
b. (1) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS communicate with and engage the entire
WORKFORCE? HOW do SENIOR LEADERS encourage frank, two-way
communication throughout the organization? HOW do SENIOR LEADERS communicate
KEY decisions? HOW do SENIOR LEADERS take an active role in reward and
recognition programs to reinforce HIGH PERFORMANCE and a CUSTOMER and
business focus?
Analysis of OFIs
The reasons why the examiners identified the 3 opportunities for improvement (OFIs) as listed
were because the applicants responses did not correspond to, and/or meet the requirements in the
criteria. For example, in the set of questions in Section 1.1 of the criteria, the following questions
are raised, but the answers are not apparent in the Baldrige application:
For example the Criteria raise the question:
a. (2) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS personally promote an organizational environment that
fosters, requires, and results in legal and ETHICAL BEHAVIOR?
40
The applicants response brought this OFI from the examiner, in part: It is unclear how
senior leaders personally promote an organizational environment that fosters, requires,
and results in legal and ethical behavior. For example, the Executive Director is widely
acknowledged as a community leader in ethics; however, it is not clear that she or other
senior leaders follow a systematic approach to personally promote an environment within
the organization that requires and results in ethical behavior
OFI 2 relates to the question of:
a. (3) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS create a SUSTAINABLE organization? HOW do SENIOR
LEADERS create an environment for organizational PERFORMANCE improvement, the
accomplishment of your MISSION and STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES, INNOVATION,
competitive or role-model PERFORMANCE leadership, and organizational agility? HOW do they
create an environment for organizational and WORKFORCE LEARNING? HOW do they
personally participate in succession planning and the development of future organizational
leaders?
The examiner responded with this OFI, in part: While succession planning for the five key
leadership positions is addressed during biennial strategic planning, it is not clear how
senior leaders personally participate in the development of future organizational leaders.
Also, information is not provided concerning other aspects of sustainability, such as issues
related to the changing future business and market environment (including volunteer
availability) or a safe and secure environment
OFI 3 relates to the question of:
b. (2) HOW do SENIOR LEADERS create a focus on action to accomplish the organizations
objectives, improve PERFORMANCE, and attain its VISION? What PERFORMANCE
MEASURES do SENIOR LEADERS regularly review to inform them on needed actions? HOW
do SENIOR LEADERS include a focus on creating and balancing VALUE for CUSTOMERS and
other STAKEHOLDERS in their organizational PERFORMANCE expectations?
The examiner responded with this OFI, in part: While senior leaders make quarterly
reports on strategic action plans to board committees (Figures 2.1-1 and 2.2-2), review
Balanced Plate Scorecard metrics monthly (Figure 4.1-1), and review numerous other
indicators frequently (Figure 4.1-2), it is not clear how senior leaders include a focus on
creating and balancing value in their organizational performance expectations for
customers and stakeholders beyond the member agencies.
These strengths and OFIs do relate well to the Key Factors, listed above for Assignment 1. This
shows that the organizations mission, vision, and values must be aligned with their leadership
system in order to be effective.
Other strengths and OFIs may always be considered, so there is room for judgment. In the Stage
2 evaluation process for Baldrige consensus feedback to applicant, 6 or 8 examiners compare their
41
scorebook results on the strengths and OFIs for the same applicant. There is always a very high
level of agreement between examiners on the strengths and OFIs when independently prepared
scorebooks for the same applicant are compared.
Case - Baldrige Assessment of Leadership Part 2
1.2 Governance and Social Responsibilities
1. The most relevant business and organization factors from the Organizational Profile pertaining
to Item 1.2
In 2002, organization exited food pantry and soup kitchen services to focus on food
banking as core competency. Aims to provide best foods, at the right time, to the right
place.
Mission, Vision, Values (MVV). Mission: A community-based food bank dedicated to
feeding the hungry residents of its communities. Vision: Iowas heartland is hungerfree. Values: We work together, we do what we say, everyone deserves respect, and
we follow through.
10.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees (8 full-time and 5 part-time); 8 of 13
employees with bachelor level or above degrees, 5 employees with high school
diplomas or associate degrees
More than 500 volunteers, including a core team of 20 volunteers, contributed 28,600
hours in 2006. Volunteers include university nutrition and management students,
government and foundation fellows, and court-ordered community-service placements.
Nearly half of volunteers are over age 55.
Multiple regulating agencies and standards to protect food, workers, member
agencies; food safety and safety of employees and volunteers require tight controls
Governance by a 12-member Board of Directors, including a county commission
representative and a rotating member agency position, with 5 subcommittees linked to
management functions
2. Strengths that the organization has relative to the criteria questions include:
STRENGTHS
SFs governance system addresses key aspects of oversight through a variety of formal
reviews and reports (Figure 1.2-1) that include involvement by the board, senior leaders,
and board committees. Board committees include employees, volunteers, and,
occasionally, suppliers and member agencies, as appropriate. In addition to these various
methods, SF addresses the protection of stakeholder interests through the broad
involvement of internal and external stakeholders in the SPP (Figure 2.1-1).
Evaluation of senior leaders performance occurs at various levels. The board conducts an
annual self-evaluation to identify improvement opportunities, such as the creation of the
interlocking Leadership System Model (Figure 1.1-1) in 2004. The board is responsible for
42
the performance evaluation of the Executive Director, using a 360-degree approach that
includes the board, senior leaders, two employees and volunteers, and executives of two
member agencies. The other senior leaders are evaluated by the Executive Director in the
areas of accomplishing strategic objectives and professional achievement goals. The senior
leaders evaluate all employees and core volunteers.
SF identifies its key communities as those within its geographic service areas, choosing
activities linked to food or hunger. It supports these communities through education about
nutrition, hunger, and the food-insecure (Figure 3.1-2) and through the LDP, which is
open to volunteers, employees, and representatives of other community nonprofits. SF
also collaborates with other organizations in the Food as an Economic Engine for
Development (FEED) Partnership to provide safety-net services. Employees and all senior
leaders are provided with time off to volunteer for community outreach programs (Figure
1.2-2). SF also provides placement for people with court-ordered community service
sentences.
While SF has developed an approach for evaluating senior leaders performance, there is
no indication of how senior leaders use the results of these reviews to further develop and
improve personal leadership effectiveness and the effectiveness of the leadership system as
a whole. Without a fact-based, systematic approach, SF may find it difficult to provide the
leadership necessary to achieve its vision: Iowas heartland is hunger-free.
It is not evident how SF anticipates public concerns with future products, services,
and operations. Additionally, while Figure P.1-3 outlines regulatory entities,
measures, and performance goals, there is no indication of the key processes used to
attain these performance levels. For instance, no processes are described to meet the
requirements and goals of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or The Emergency
Food Assistance Program (TEFAP). Proactive anticipation of concerns and processes
to address ongoing regulatory requirements may provide the opportunity to manage
regulatory requirements and stakeholder risks as part of a systematic approach
rather than attending to issues as they emerge.
43
promote, ensure, and measure ethical behavior does not appear to be aligned with
the importance that the Executive Director places on this subject.
Adapted from: 2007 Annual Report of from Bill Enloe, TCC President and CEO. Source:
http://www.lanb.com/tcc/annual.asp