Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project
Project
htm
Procurement notice
Publication of the public procurement notice marks the start of the formal procurement process. The
Authority must comply with all requirements related to the publication of notices in the Official Journal
of the European Union (OJEU). It is good practice to also publish the procurement notice in one or
more international periodicals. The OJEU notice is followed by a questionnaire to enable interested
companies to demonstrate their qualifications (also known as the submission of an expression of
interest).
Prequalification
The wording of the brief project description contained in the OJEU notice should be broad enough for it
not to need to be subsequently changed (which might then require the procurement process to start
all over again). The purpose of prequalification is to include only those bidders that appear to be
capable of carrying out the PPP project in an adequate manner.
Typically, interested parties that respond to an initial notice are sent a short statement of information
about the project and instructions or a questionnaire. These form the basis of a qualification
submission that such parties must make to demonstrate their ability to implement the project.
The invitation to prequalify (or prequalification questionnaire, as it may be called) should contain at
least the following:
a list and summary of the major studies that will be made available to bidders concerning
the project;
the qualifications that companies can put forward (e.g. parent or subsidiary companies
qualifications);
the criteria and tests that will be used to evaluate the prequalification statement (but not
necessarily the precise details to be used in any scoring or ranking since that could lead to
some manipulation by the candidates); and
a timetable.
It is standard practice for the Authoritys legal advisers to draft both the PPP procurement notice and
the prequalification questionnaire.
Pre-qualification is a process whereby a loan officer takes information from a borrower and makes
a tentative assessment of how much the lending institution is willing to lend them.
Shortlisting
The purpose of shortlisting is to reduce the number of bidders to generally between three and five.
Bidding for a PPP project, especially a complex one, is a costly undertaking for a bidder. Evaluating
bids is also a time-consuming exercise for the Authority and its advisers. The aim of the bidding
process is to maximize competition, not the number of bidders. Just as the presence of too few
bidders results in poor competition, the presence of too many bidders on the shortlist may reduce the
interest of some in participating and cause good bidders to drop out.
In some cases the public sector has sought to encourage candidates to bid by agreeing in advance to
make a payment to each losing bidder that would partially reimburse it for the costs of bid
preparation. Such payment could be made from money that the Authority would receive from the
winning bidder (once again, specified in advance). The size of the payment has to be calibrated to
discourage frivolous bids. Practice varies widely between countries. The Authority should ask their
advisers about current market practice in the relevant sector and jurisdiction.
In evaluating the qualification submission, the Authority will focus on the technical capability, business
capability and financial position of the potential bidders. In line with EU public procurement legislation,
these capacities must be, in principle, demonstrated jointly, rather than individually, by the members
of a consortium.
The prequalification submission will usually be required to describe the following:
the business activities of the consortium (e.g. how many projects of a similar nature, the
consortium has implemented over a specified number of years);
The first step of the prequalification and shortlisting process is often to determine which consortia
have passed the thresholds in all the relevant respects (i.e. pass/fail tests). Most of the criteria (e.g.
company revenue) are expressed in terms of clear and objective thresholds. If this results in a number
of consortia that exceed the maximum number pre-specified for the shortlist, then a systematic and
predetermined process for scoring or ranking should be used to narrow down the list to arrive at a
shortlist.
Sometimes shortlisting is done partly on the basis of responses that are submitted to a set of openended questions about how the companies would address certain key issues if they were to win the
PPP contract. For example, in the competitive dialogue procedure, initial shortlisting can be based
partly on an assessment of the outline or indicative solutions given by the candidates.
At the end of the process, a well-substantiated prequalification report should be prepared to provide a
good audit trail. Unsuccessful bidders should be debriefed.
Business Development
Pre-Qualification Form
(On Success)
3 Type of Contractor
Pure Contracting
The "designbuilder" is often a general contractor, but in many cases a project is led by a
design professional (architect, engineer, architectural technologist or other professional
designers). Some designbuild firms employ professionals from both the design and
construction sector. Where the designbuilder is a general contractor, the designers are
typically retained directly by the contractor. Partnership or a joint venture between a design
firm and a construction firm may be created on a long term basis or for one project only.
Until 1979, the AIA American Institute of Architects' code of ethics and professional conduct
prohibited their members from providing construction services. However today many
architects in the United States and elsewhere aspire to provide integrated design and
construction services, and one approach towards this goal is designbuild. The AIA has
acknowledged that designbuild is becoming one of the main approaches to construction. In
2003, the AIA endorsed "The architect's guide to designbuild services", which was written to
help their members acting as designbuild contractors. This publication gives guidance
through the different phases of the process: design services, contracts, management,
insurances, and finances
During the designbuild procedure, the contractor is deciding on design issues as well as
issues related to cost, profits and time exigencies. Whilst the traditional method of
construction procurement dissociates the designers from the contractors interests, design
build does not. On these grounds it is considered that the designbuild procedure is poorly
adapted to projects that require complex designs for technical, programmatic or aesthetic
purposes. If the designer/architect is 'kept' by the construction company, he probably will
never push the envelope as to what might be possible. A notable designbuild project that
received significant criticism, not only for excessive cost but for environmental issues, was
the Belmont Learning Center. The scandal involved alleged contaminated soil that caused
significant delays and massive cost overruns. In Los Angeles, District Attorney Steve Cooley,
who investigated the Los Angeles Unified School Districts Belmont project, produced a final
investigative report, released March 2003. This report concluded that the designbuild
process caused a number of issues relating to the Belmont scandal:
Designbuild does not make use of competitive bidding where prospective builders bid on
the same design.
Criteria to select contractor is subjective and difficult to evaluate and to justify later.
The design and price selected arouses public suspicion, true or not.
It concluded the designbuild approach and mixed-use concept together caused controversy,
uncertainty, and complexity of the Belmont project which helped increase the potential for project
failure.
While the Belmont investigation cleared the Los Angeles Unified School District of any criminal
wrongdoing, the task force recommends strict oversight, including written protocols, a vigorous
Office of the Inspector General, and other recommendations if it decides to continue to use the
designbuild approach.
During the period in question, the ex-Superintendent of LAUSD, Ramon C. Cortines, working
with the LAUSD Board of Education, whose president is Monica Garcia, actively tried to cut the
Office of Inspector General by 75% (compromising on 25%) and subsequently removed the
Inspector General Jerry Thornton after he produced critical audits that showed misuse of
construction funds.
General Condition
Time Limit
Payment Terms
Completion Sequence
BOQ
Compliances Document
Mobilization of Material
Project Execution Purchase Accounts Project Team as per Project Schedule + Payment by Client
Balance Payment
Retention 5% for 1 Year on Hold
DLP (Defect Liability Period)
Escalation Chart