Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materials Chemistry and Physics: Sciencedirect
Materials Chemistry and Physics: Sciencedirect
h i g h l i g h t s
La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 compounds were synthesized by the solegel method.
ssbauer study: presence of Fe3 tetrahedral site and a doublet for x 0 sample.
Mo
ssbauer results revealed the presence of Fe3O4 phase.
For x > 0 samples, the Mo
The substitution of Ca2 by Pb2 introduces a change on the magnetization.
Competition between tetrahedral FM and octahedral AFM interactions.
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 16 May 2014
Received in revised form
17 October 2014
Accepted 26 October 2014
Available online 4 November 2014
The La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20) compounds were prepared by the solegel
method using the citric acid route. The structural study revealed that all samples crystallized in the Pnma
orthorhombic structure with the apparition of Ca2Fe2O5 and Fe3O4 secondary phases for samples with
x 0.05, conrmed by the Raman spectroscopy study.
ssbauer spectra exposed, for x 0.00 sample, the presence of a one sextuplet, related to
The tted Mo
the Fe3 ion in the tetrahedral site, and a doublet. However, for x > 0.00 samples, the t results showed
the apparition of other sextuplets related to the Fe3O4 phase. The percentage of this latest phase was
found to increase and to reach a maximum for the x 0.10 sample and to decrease after for x 0.15 and
0.20 samples.
The variation of the magnetization (M) as a function of the temperature (T), under an applied magnetic
eld of 0.05 T, showed the presence of a ferromagneticeparamagnetic transition. The magnetic study
exposed that the magnetization decreases rst for x 0.10 samples and then increases for the two other
samples. This behavior was related to the competition between the Fe3eFe3 tetrahedral ferromagnetic
interactions and the octahedral antiferromagnetic ones between Fe3 and Fe2 ions.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Magnetic materials
Raman spectroscopy and scattering
ssbauer effect
Mo
Powder diffraction
1. Introduction
There has been much interest in perovskite-structured compounds (of general formula ABO3) because of their unique catalytic
action [1], colossal magnetoresistance effects [2,3], and gas-sensing
properties [4e13].
Many materials of technological and scientic interest have
structures which derive from, or are related to, the parent ABO3
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: bejar_moez@yahoo.fr (M. Bejar).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.10.047
0254-0584/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
468
2. Experimental details
The nanosize crystalline La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00, 0.05, 0.10,
0.15 and 0.20) compounds [22] were synthesized by the solegel
method [23,24]. This method was chosen because it is known to
give a high degree of homogeneity and the particle size can be
controlled up to the nanosize level. Stoichiometric amounts of
lanthanum nitrate, lead nitrate, calcium nitrate, ferric nitrate and
citrate acid (all analytically pure) powders were weighted.
The phase purity, the homogeneity, lattice structure and cell
parameters of our compounds were checked by X-ray diffraction
(XRD) analysis (Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer, with monochromator CueKa radiation (lCu 1.5406 )). The XRD data were
also used for rening the lattice parameters by means of Rietveld
analysis [25], by using the FULLPROOF program software.
Room temperature (RT) Raman spectroscopy was performed
under backscattering geometry, using a Jobin Yvon HR 800 system
and an excitation wavelength of 473 nm. For the RT absorption
experiments, a Shimadzu UV 2100 spectrometer was used in
transmission mode in a wavelength range from 200 to 900 nm. The
Raman spectra were recorded with a modular double grating
excitation spectrouorimeter with a TRIAX 320 emission monochromator (Fluorolog-3, Horiba Scientic) coupled to an HR 980
Hamamatsu photomultiplier, using a front face acquisition mode.
As an excitation source a 450 W X arc lamp was used [26].
ssbauer spectra were collected at
The transmission 57Fe Mo
room temperature using a constant acceleration spectrometer and
a 25 mCi 57Co source in Rh matrix in a constant acceleration mode
ssbauer spectrometer (Weissel).
using standard conguration of Mo
The velocity scale was calibrated using an a-Fe foil. Estimated isomer shifts (IS) are given relative to this standard. The tting of the
spectra was carried out with a set of Lorentzian lines, determined
by least squares tting programme NORMOS.
The magnetic measurements were made using a cryogen free
Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM) that allows measurements
as a function of temperature (between 200 and 750 K), with a
maximum value of magnetic eld of 10 T.
469
Fig. 1. Observed (circle), calculated (continuous line) and difference patterns (at the bottom) of X-ray diffraction data for La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00 and 0.10) compounds. The
vertical tick indicates the allowed reections.
470
200
400
600
800
1000
x = 0.00
x = 0.20
x = 0.05
x = 0.15
x = 0.10
x = 0.15
x = 0.10
x = 0.20
-12
-8
-4
12
Velocity (mm/s)
Fig. 4. Room temperature spectra of La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00e0.20) samples
tted with three sextets and one doublet.
x = 0.05
x = 0.00
200
400
600
800
1000
-1
sample, the magnetization was due to the low ferromagnetic interactions between the Fe3 ions in the tetrahedral site. Based on
this, an enhancement of the magnetization was expected when
increasing the Pb-content given that the percentage of the Fe3 ions
in the tetrahedral site increases as previously mentioned in the
ssbauer part. However, the magnetization decreased for x 0.05
Mo
and 0.10 samples. This contradiction can be correlated to the
apparition of the 2 and 3 iron valence, related the octahedral site
ssbauer part. The
of Fe3O4 phase as mentioned previously in the Mo
apparition of the two valence state led to the introduction of antiferromagnetic interactions between these Fe3 and Fe2 octahedral site ions. In addition, H.D. Zhou et al. [35] proved that the Fe3/
Fe2 redox couple is removed from the Fe4/Fe3 redox couple by a
large intra-atomic interaction Ueff U De. So, it can be assumed
that there is a competition between the Fe3eFe3 tetrahedral
ferromagnetic interactions and the octahedral antiferromagnetic
ones. Going deeper, T. Maitra et al. [36] conrmed that the presence
of Fe2 makes the FM phase less stable compared to the tetrahedral
case. The antiferromagnetic phase, therefore, stabilizes and become
more predominant.
Table 1
ssbauer parameters of La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00e0.20) compounds at
Fitted Mo
300 K.
Samples
Sub-spectrum
Area (%)
Hhyp (kOe)
IS
(mm/s)
QS
(mm/s)
<Hhyp>
(kOe)
x 0.00
S1
S2
S3
d
S1
S2
S3
d
S1
S2
S3
d
S1
S2
S3
d
S1
S2
S3
d
22.2
20
54
3.8
33.7
20.5
42.1
3.7
34.8
13.5
50
1.7
62.7
5.7
26
5.5
85
2.3
6
5.4
492.8
468.8
418.0
//
503.0
484.1
437.2
//
512.3
463.0
492
//
516.5
463.0
492.0
//
523.8
463.0
492.0
//
0.36
0.35
0.32
0.38
0.36
0.31
0.30
0.43
0.37
0.67
0.29
0.36
0.35
0.67
0.29
0.36
0.35
0.67
0.29
0.36
//
//
//
2.32
//
//
//
2.42
//
//
//
2.82
//
//
//
2.82
//
//
//
2.82
428.7
x 0.05
x 0.10
x 0.15
x 0.20
452.8
486.7
478.1
485.4
Magnetization (emu/g)
x = 0.00
x = 0.05
x = 0.10
x = 0.15
x = 0.20
0H = 0.05 T
0
200
300
400
500
600
700
T(K)
Magnetization (emu/g)
x = 0.00
x = 0.05
x = 0.10
x = 0.15
x = 0.20
0H = 2 T
471
4. Conclusion
2
200
300
400
500
600
T(K)
700
0.00
0.6
x = 0.05
-0.01
0.3
dM/dT (emu/g.K)
Magnetization (emu/g)
0.9
TC = 669 K
0.0
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
T (K)
0.00
0.8
x = 0.15
-0.01
0.4
dM/dT (emu/g.K)
Magnetization (emu/g)
1.2
-0.02
TC = 670 K
0.0
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
T (K)
Fig. 6. Temperature dependence of magnetization and the Curie temperature of
La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.05 and 0.15) compounds.
Fig. 7. Magnetic eld dependence (m0H) of magnetization (M) curves at two different
temperatures of 5 and 300 K of La0.8Ca0.2xPbxFeO3 (x 0.00e0.20) compounds.
472
[4] C.M. Chiu, J.F. Hu, C.J. Ji, Y.H. Chang, Thin Solid Films 342 (1999) 15e19.
[5] Z.Y. Peng, X. Li, M.Y. Zhao, H. Cai, S.Q. Zhao, G.D. Hu, Thin Solid Films 286
(1996) 270e273.
[6] C.M. Chiu, Y.H. Chang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 266 (1999) 93e98.
[7] C.M. Chiu, Y.H. Chang, Sens. Actuat. B 54 (1999) 236e242.
[8] N.N. Toan, S. Saukko, V. Lantto, Sens. Actuat. B 327 (2003) 279e282.
[9] L.B. Kong, Y.S. Shen, Sens. Actuat. B 54 (1996) 217e221.
[10] Y.D. Wang, J.B. Chen, X.H. Wu, Mater. Lett. 49 (2001) 361e364.
[11] M. Tomoda, S. Okano, Y. Itagaki, H. Aono, Y. Sadaoka, Sens. Actuat. B 97 (2004)
190e197.
[12] D. Mantzavinos, A. Hartley, I.S. Metcalfe, M. Sahibzada, Solid State Ionics 134
(2000) 103e109.
[13] M.J. Akhtar, Z.N. Akhtar, J.P. Dragun, C.R.A. Catlow, Solid State Ionics 104
(1997) 147e158.
[14] S.J. Skinner, J. Inorg. Mater. 3 (2001) 113e121.
[15] V.V. Kharton, A.V. Kovalevsky, A.A. Yaremchenko, F.M. Figueiredo,
E.M. Naumovich, A.L. Shaulo, F.M.B. Marques, J. Membr. Sci. 195 (2002)
277e287.
[16] V.V. Kharton, A.A. Yaremchenko, A.V. Kovalevsky, A. Viskup, E.M. Naumovich,
P.F. Kerko, J. Membr. Sci. 163 (1999) 307e317.
[17] L.L. Barcells, R. Enrich, A. Callega, J. Fontcuberta, X. Obradors, J. Appl. Phys. 81
(1997) 4298e4300.
[18] Y.Q. Liang, N.L. Di, Z.H. Cheng, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 134416.
[19] J. Li, Hyperne Interact. 69 (1991) 573e576.
[20] Y.Q. Liang, N.L. Di, Z.H. Cheng, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 306 (2006) 35e39.
[21] M.A. Ahmed, S.I. El-Dek, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 128 (2006) 30.
[22] A. Benali, S. Azizi, M. Bejar, E. Dhahri, M.F.P. Graa, Ceram. Int. 40 (2014)
14367e14373.
[23] M.P.F. Graa, C. Nico, M. Peres, M.A. Valente, T. Monteiro, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 12 (2012) 1e7.
[24] M.P.F. Graa, P.R. Prezas, M.M. Costa, M.A. Valente, J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 64
(2012) 78e85.
[25] R.A. Young, The Rietveld Method, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
[26] C. Nico, R. Fernandes, M.P.F. Graa, M. Elisa, B.A. Sava, R.C.C. Monteiro, L. Rino,
T. Monteiro, J. Luminescence 145 (2014) 582e587.
[27] H.M. Rietveld, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2 (1969) 65.
[28] M. Popa, J. Frantti, M. Kakihana, Solid State Ionics 154e155 (2002) 135e141.
[29] Y. Wang, J. Zhu, L. Zhang, X. Yang, L. Lude, X. Wang, Mater. Lett. 60 (2006)
1767e1770.
[30] Y.M. Choi, H. Abernathy, H.T. Chen, M.C. Lin, M. Liu, Chem. Phys. Chem. 7
(2006) 1957.
[31] C. Guo, Y. Hu, H. Qian, J. Ning, S. Xu, Mater. Charact. 62 (2011) 148e151.
[32] F.M.A. Da Costa, A.J.C. Dos Santos, Inorg. Chim. Acta 140 (1987) 105.
[33] L. Fournes, Y. Potin, J.C. Grenier, G. Demazeau, M. Pouchard, Solid State
Commun. 62 (1987) 239.
[34] K. De, R. Ray, R.N. Panda, S. Giri, H. Nakamura, T. Kohara, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
288 (2005) 339.
[35] H.D. Zhou, J.B. Goodenough, J. Solid State Chem. 178 (2005) 3679e3685.
[36] T. Maitra, R. Valent, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17 (2005) 7417e7431.