Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

TO BE FILLED IN

DURING EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


MFOs
Qualit
y
Access
25%

MFOs

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Republic of the Philippines


1.1.
Undertook
Department of Education,
Region VII, Central Visayas

Learner
SCHOOLS
s
Outcom
e (15%)

activities OF CEBU
toCITY
DIVISION
improve
performance
indicators

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

MOVs

ACTUAL
RESULT

TARGET

RATING

SCORE

RPMS Individual Performance Commitment & Review Form

Name of
employee:
Position:

MARJORIE C.
MANLOSA
Teacher III

Rating Period:

SY 2014 - 2015

Unit/Department/Section:
Immediate
Head/Supervisor:
Date of Review:

1.1.1 Increased in
the
following
performance
indicators by 2% SY 2014MPS of Subject Areas
NAT Result
over SY 2013-2014
2015
Handled: English
for SY 20135

130%
or
89.53
&
above
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2014 & MOVs
a. MPS of Subject
4 115%
or 79.20
toTimeliness)2014-2015
(Quality,
Efficiency,
Area
Handled:
129% or 89.20
2.2 Personal
Conducted action
English
3 100% or 68.87 to 114%
Growth &
plan/research.
from 68.87 to
or 79.19
profession
79.19
2 51% or 35.12 to 99% or
al
2.2.1 Conducted 1
SY 2014Action Plan/Research
SWOT
68.86
developme action research/plan
2015
Conducted (1)
Analysis
1 50% or 34.44 & below
nt (15%)
with SWOT Analysis in
5 1 with SDS approval
Action
a year.
4 1 with PSDS approval
Research
3 1 with SH approval
b. Promotion Rate
SY 2014Promotion Rate ( 88.64 )
Grade
2 1 without SH approval
from 88.64 to
2015
5 130% or 117.53 &
Sheets
1 incomplete
90.41
above
SY 20134 115% or 103.97 to
2014 &
2.2.2. Earned 3
SY 2014MA/Doctoral Units Earned (3
129% or 117.52
2014-2015
MA/Doctoral units in a 2015
units/year)
3 100% or 90.41to 114%
year
5 - 9 units
or 103.96
earned/thesis/dissertation
2 51% or 90.41 to 99% or
writing
103.96
4 6 units earned
1 50% or 45.21 & below
3 3 units earned
2 enrolled but not
completed
1 - did not enroll
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
MOVs
(Quality,
Efficiency,
Timeliness)
(Note:
5 - Doctor
of
Education Graduate)
1.1.2 Decreased in

BANILAD ELEMENTARY - GRADE


5
LILY ANN S. GO
June 2014 - March 2015

Subject
Subject
Handled
Handled
MPS: TARGETMPS: ACTUAL
English =
English
=
RESULT
68.87
69.62

1 AR with
SH
approval
Promotion
Rate=
90.41

RATING

Incomple
te

Promotion
Rate=

100%

Did
not
enroll

TARGET

ACTUAL
RESULT

SCORE

0.45

0.15

0.75
1

0.15

RATING

SCORE

0.75

the
following
performance
indicators by 2%
over SY 2013-2014
SY 2014-

Failure Rate ( 6.82 )

Grade

Failure

Failure Rate

2.2.3 Attended 5
seminars/trainings/LA
C sessions/workshops
in a year

MFOs
Qualit
y&
Good
Gover
nance
(25%)

KRAs
3.1.
Communit
y Linkages
(15%)

OBJECTIVES
Supported
activities of
governmental and
non-governmental
organizations
3.1.1. Conducted 3
Homeroom PTA
Meetings/TeacherParent Conferences
with 75%
Participation
3.1.2. Participated in
the following
activities:
NGO/LGU/PPP
Initiated
a. Parade/Alay
Lakad
b. Clean-Up Drive
c. Tree Planting
d. BCPC
e. Barangay Fiesta
f. Others
School Initiated:
a. Bridaga Eskwela

SY 20142015

TIMELINE
SY 20142015

SY 20142015

Seminars/trainings/workshop
s/LAC sessions attended (5)
5 7 seminars & above
4 6 seminars
3 5 seminars
2 4 seminars
1 3 seminars & below

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Certificate of
participation
Travel Order
Narrative
Report
Attendance

MOVs

Homeroom Meeting/TP
Meetings (3)
5 5 Meetings
4 4 Meetings
3 3 Meetings
2 2 Meetings
1 1 Meetings

Attendance
Sheet
Minutes of
Meeting
Pictorials

NGO/LGU/PPP Initiated
Activities (3)
5 5 Activities & above
4 4 Activities
3 3 Activities
2 2 Activities
1 1 Activities

Certificate of
Appearance
Pictorials

School Initiated Activities (5)


5 7 Activities & above
4 6 Activities
3 5 Activities

Seminars /
trainings/
workshops
/
LAC
session
attended
=5

TARGET
Homeroo
m
PTA
Meetings/T
eacherParent
Conferenc
es = 3

Semina
rs
/trainin
gs/work
shops/L
AC
session
attende
d=7
semina
rs
ACTUAL
RESULT
Homero
om PTA
Meeting
s/Teach
erParent
Confere
nces =
5

NGO/LGU/
PPP
Initiated
Activities
=3

activiti
es

School
Initiated
Activities

activiti

0.75

RATING

SCORE

0.75

0.45

0.75

Certificate of
Appearance
Pictorials

b. Adopt-A-School
c. Fund Raising
d. Tree Planting/
Greening
e. Religious
Activities
f. Graduation/
Recognition
g. AIP /APP Making
h. Intramurals
i. Others

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES
Maintained
harmonious
relationship with
fellow teachers and
other school
personnel as well
as with parents and
other stakeholders
3.1.3 Resolved
conflicts within school
level.

2 3 to 4 Activities
1 1 to 2 Activities

TIMELINE
SY 2014 2015

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Conflicts Resolved (Sch. Level
by Teacher)
5 No Conflict
4 Conflict resolved by the
Teacher
3 Conflict resolved by the
School
Grievance Committee
2 Conflict resolved by the
District
Grievance Committee
1 Conflict Resolved by
the Division
Grievance Committee
(Note: Average points of
conflicts resolved)
Conflict Made (0)
50
41
32

=5

MOVs
Incident
Report
Certification
of No
Conflict
signed by SH

TARGET
Conflict
Resolve by
the School
Grievance
Committe
e

es

ACTUAL
RESULT
Conflict
Made =

RATING

SCORE

0.75

23
1 4 or more

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

3.2 Data
Manageme
nt (10%)

Maintained
updated
pupils/students
progress
and
school
records
regularly
3.2.1. Submitted the
following
accurate
records
on
the
deadline:
a. SF 1
b. SF 2
c. SF 3
d. SF 5
e. Form 137
f. Form 138
g. Form XIV with
graph presentation
& analysis
h.
Test
item
analysis
(Frequency
of
Error,
Skills

TIMELINE

SY 2014 2015

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Date of submission
5 3 days earlier than the
deadline
4 1 day earlier than the
deadline
3 on time/deadline set
2 1 day after the deadline
1 3 days after the
deadline

MOVs

TARGET

Received
report

on time
/deadline
set

75% or 10
accurate
records

ACTUAL
RESULT

RATING

SCORE

3 days
earlier
than
the
deadlin
e

0.5

100%
or 13
accurat
e
records

0.5

(Note: Average points of all


submitted reports)
Accuracy
5 100% or 13accurate
records
4 80% or 11 to 12
accurate records
3 75% or 10 accurate
records

tested,
Not
Mastered/Least
Mastered/Master
ed Skills)
i. List of 10 Least
Mastered Skills
j. Class Record
k. Grade Sheet
l. DORP Form 1
m. DORP Form 2

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES
3.2.2.
Distributed
75% of Form 138 on
time

2 51% 6 to 9 accurate
records
1 50% or 5 & below
(Note: Average points of all
submitted reports)

TIMELINE
SY 2014 2015

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Form 138 distribution (on
time)
5=100% distribution on set
date or 40 pupils
4=80% distribution on set
date or 32 pupils
3=75% distribution on set
date or 30 pupils
2=51% distribution on set
date or 21 pupils
1= 50% distribution on set
date or 20 pupils

MOVs
Attendance
on Card
Issuance
Parents
signature in
Form 138

TARGET

ACTUAL
RESULT

RATING

SCORE

75%
distributio
n on set
date

100%
distribu
t-ion
on set
date

0.5

updated

Update
d but
not
complet
e

0.2

Does related work.


3.2.3 Compiled
individual Teachers
Professional Portfolio
based on the
following:
a. pertinent
records
b. performance
target
c. performance

SY 2014 2015

Teachers Portfolio
5 updated, complete &
well-organized
4 updated, complete
3 updated
2 updated but not
complete
1 not updated, not
complete,
not organized

Teachers
Individual
Portfolio

output
d. training profile
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Ratee :
Approving Authority :

MARJORIE C. MANLOSA
S. GO
Teacher III

III

Over
all
ratin
g for
acco
mplis
hmen
ts

Rater:

SHIRLEY M. CASTAO
Master Teacher I

LILY ANN
Principal

3.48

You might also like