Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transcript4 15 PDF
Transcript4 15 PDF
Transcript4 15 PDF
April
(Whereupon,
proceedi
court, to
THE COURT:
6
7
8
Gillespie versus
t:
I'l I
cal
I the case of
Hoffman.
11
of
13
14
wi
10
12
15,2011
Gillespie.
Gillespie.
15
MR. GILLESPIE:
16
17
ng,
Your
Honor.
20
ff's
I
understand there's two mot-i ons on cal endar, One i s
for reconsi derati on, The other's to stri ke the
21
Cross - Compl ai nt
18
19
22
23
24
25
26
s is
p1
ai ntj
KATHY
1',|
CP
15
that
Cross-Comp1 ai
6
7
I
I
10
11
MS. GILLESPIE:
that
that
THE COURT:
13
14
answer,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
to
answer the
nt forthwi th.
We d-i dn't understand what that meant
or why you needed to have an answer before a moti on
to strike or demurrer. We did the motion to strike
and demurrer. And the motion to strike 'i s the
enti re Compl a'i nt because everythi ng has a1 ready
been addressed in Porterville Case Number 1 --
12
15
we needed
Let
me
fi I ed a demurrer to
the
KATHY
CP
reconsi derati on
4
5
6
17
18
facts.
19
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
KATHY
CP
17
5
6
7
I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
supreme
MS. GILLESPIE:
ThC
21
22
23
17
18
19
20
24
25
26
KATHY
1.,|
CP
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
unti
I the entry of
noti ce i s
one
THE COURT:
10
11
al
my own because
I'm not
i ncl i ned
to do i t
on
17
18
19
We had
20
12
13
14
15
16
21
22
MS. GILLESPIE:
Code
30 days accord'i ng
to the
according
to
the
of Civil
25
26
answer according
23
24
same day
KATHY
to
M
CP
19
1
cl ari
fi cati on on that.
So are
2
3
mot-i
on
does
that affect
our
4
5
you
moti on?
tentative ruling,
The tentative ruling is the
THE COURT:
the demurrer.
10
11
12
13
14
15
forthwi th
16
18
ch we d j d a f ew days
I ater but i t wasn't
i t was a moti on to stri ke
and a demurrer. And the tentat j ve ru1 i ng actua'l 1y
19
WAS
20
23
you're getting
si detracked a I j ttl e bi t because what we're ta1 ki ng
about i s whether you have the ri ght under the Code
of Ci vi I Procedure to even bri ng thj s moti on for
24
17
21
22
the Cross-Complaint
t'ls, GI LLESPIE:
Wh1
WAS
There'
25
26
answer
has to determi
KATHY
t"l
CP
20
t-i
2
3
4
5
me
I
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
M. CORREIA,
OFFICIAL.
N0.
CSR
RPR & CP
4490
21
2
3
4
5
6
e, thi s i s the
pl eadi ng stage we' re ta'l ki ng about now, I mean
that's al I we're ta1 ki ng about,
THE C0URT:
t',|i
ss
Gi I I espi
22
23
24
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
THE COURT:
MS. GILLESPIE:
KATHY
|\,l
So
CORREIA, CSR
NO
CP
4490
22
THE COURT:
any
Your Honor , we
would submit on the basis of our opposition,
THE COURT: Mi ss Gi I I espi e, here's
real
17
on
there's
as to the rel ati onshi p between the parti es and the
ownershi p of the property and whether some type of
1 egal ri ght exi sts by one party as opposed to the
other. And we're goi ng to strai ghten al I thi s out
as we go through " But the p1 eadi ngs, i fl the
Court' s opi ni on as refl ected i n the tentati ve
ru1 i ng, i s suffi ci ent to bri ng those i ssues before
the Court, They're not defective as a matter of
law. So we need to get the answer on f-i le and we
-i
need to get the matter set f or
s i t set for
18
tri al ?
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
comments?
19
20
THE COURT:
21
22
23
24
25
26
So,
N0.
CP
4490
23
14
15
that
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
17
18
16
19
to have al I
my
20
21
welcome the
25
26
22
23
24
KATHY
]'4
basi
CP
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
I
10
11
12
13
14
15
vi I Procedure
reconsi derati on.
of
Ci
16
(Whereupon,
17
the
proceedi ngs
-o0o-
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
KATHY
CP