Brown Column. Feb. 18, 2010 (Abolish State Offices)

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Baton Rouge, Louisiana

JUST THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR’S OFFICE?

ABOLISH EM’ ALL BOBBY!

A number two guy in Louisiana? Lieutenant Governor! What Lieutenant


Governor? If Gov. Bobby Jindal has his way, the number two spot in the state
hierarchy is a gone pecan. But hey Governor, why stop there? Do we really
need more elected public officials than any state in the country?

It’s not like Jindal has a philosophical problem with too many elected officials.
When he was campaigning for the state’s top two years ago, there was nary
a word about eliminating any elected officials. But with the present
Lieutenant Governor Mitch Landrieu stepping down in May to assume the
new duty of Mayor of New Orleans, the Governor saw an opportunity. No
incumbent, no immediate election, so few feathers to ruffle.

Jindal’s problem is that with term limits for legislators, there are a number of
ambitious potential candidates looking for a place to politically land. But why
stop with only the second spot? If the ball starts rolling, why not take a look
at a number of public offices, many that exist in only a few other states, and
mark them for appointment or even full elimination. If more efficiency and
saving money is the ballet cry, then let the open flood gates begin.

Jindal says eliminating the post of Lieutenant Governor would save the
taxpayers one million dollars. This may be a stretch, since the post only
pays $125,000. The second in command does have several state troopers to
drive and protect. I’ve never heard of anyone profiling any Lieutenant
Governor for harm, and the other statewide officials seem to do fine by
driving themselves, so there is money to be saved by eliminating this spot.

A better idea, particularly for Jindal, would be to emulate 25 other states and
have the lieutenant governor run on a ticket with the governor. They
supposedly work as a team in running the executive branch along the lines
of the president and the vice president. One would think this would be
particularly appealing concept for Jindal, who spends a great deal of time out
of the state pursuing his national agenda. Only five states have no lieutenant
governor. So by having his own personal pick, Jindal and future governors
just add a high profile additional member to the governor’s team to fill in or
appear when the governor has other priorities.
What about other statewide offices? How many are really that critical to
protecting the public interest that they require a statewide election? Jindal
has suggested the Secretary of State should be the second in line to be
elected. I know something about this job, holding it for two terms and being
unopposed my re- election. The duties are important: overseeing corporate
filings, running the election process, and administering the state archives.
But most of this is ministerial. No major policy involved, and the job is
appointed in numerous states, particularly the bigger states like Florida,
Texas, and New York.

By the way, the constitution in Louisiana charges the Secretary of State with
being the keeper of the Great Seal. I spent eight years looking for this major
symbol of the state’s identity but never found it.

Agriculture commissioner? An overwhelmingly appointed job throughout the


country. And electing the insurance commissioner is a dying process. Only
12 states presently elect their insurance commissioner. California does
elect, but the present commissioner has called for the office to be appointed
in the future. I held this office, too, for 12 years, and can say from
experience that having an elected commissioner brings no special benefit to
the office. If anything, appointing the job stops all the campaign fund raising
from the insurance companies that the commissioner is supposed to be
regulating.

And why stop at statewide elected officials? With tax dollars being scarce,
this might be an excellent time to do some real streamlining on both the
state and local level. Just how many boards, commissions, water districts,
sewer districts, parish auditors, law enforcement offices, and a whole list of
other special districts are spread throughout Louisiana? No one really seems
to know. Some estimates are as high as 7,000. But can you believe no
agency, public or private, can list all the public bodies that exist in Louisiana
today? And if no one knows the number, than it goes without saying that no
one knows the overlapping cost.

Do we need 64 parishes? Would 45 work more efficiently and save millions?


Do cities that take up the bulk of the parish like New Orleans, Baton Rouge,
and Shreveport really need both an elected sheriff and a police chief? Some
of the small, rural parishes have as few as nine thousand people per district
judge. The average is more like 20,000 per judge. Should consolidation be
undertaken? Why does every parish elect a coroner? Back in the 70s in my
home parish of Concordia, the job was held by a local logger. Couldn’t this
job be run by professionals on a regional basis?

As demographer Elliot Stonecipher has pointed out in a recent study,


Louisiana’s population is exactly the same today (4,410,000) as it was in
1985. Yet far from any reduction in local and state governmental entities,
the numbers have significantly increased. Over the past century, little has
changed involving how local government operates, and the system in place
is still run by the same archaic institutions that were put in place before the
invention of the telephone, light bulb, automobile and of course, the
computer.

On the state level, the same overlap and duplicity exists. Four boards to
govern higher education? How come states like California and North
Carolina, where colleges rank at the top of all national lists, seem to get by
quite well with just one board? And how about the slew of state boards and
commissions that almost seem to make up ways to regulate where none is
needed? If I go to Whole Foods and buy a dozen valentine roses for my wife,
do I really need a licensed florist, who has to be tested and certified through
a floral board, to wrap them up for me? Or a board to oversee someone I
hire to help decorate my office or home?

In a recent interview, former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw talked about the
problem and the opportunity: “Every state and every region of the country is
stuck with some form of anachronistic and expensive local government
structure that dates to the horse-drawn wagons, family farms and small-town
convenience. It’s time to reorganize our state and local government
structures for today’s realities rather than cling to the sensibilities of
the twentieth century.”

So Governor, let the process begin. The Louisiana Commission on


Streamlining Government is now meeting. Their mission could well be
extended by executive order to put all these public positions on the table.
Then, instead of just dealing with a one shot political office, the state has the
chance to make a quantum leap for decades to come.

*****
“Once a man holds public office, he is absolutely no good for honest
work.” Will Rogers

Peace and Justice

Jim Brown

Jim Brown’s weekly column appears in numerous newspapers and websites


throughout the south. To read past columns going back to 2002, go to
www.jimbrownla.com.

You might also like